Brainwashing. My corporation had DEI training and the corporate trainer actually said "you can't have too many white men in the meeting room". The training room had 8 people of color and 2 whites. A majority were appalled at the comment. When challenged the trainer went on to name our CEO and say he is all in and says if you are not then you need to find another job elsewhere. This at one of the if not the nations largest wholesaler. You see less qualified and talented individuals getting jobs based on DEI rather than merit and its obvious. All of management below facility leaders, a vast majority non white, believe fully in merit. As Dr. Martin Luther King implied and said we want people to judge by content of character rather than color of skin...or gender or gender preference. Corporations as well as schools have gone off their collective rockers.
"...inclusive environment for MINORITIZED students..." They INTENTIONALLY and EXPLICILTLY refuse to include "non-minoritized" students in this. Why? So they can discriminate against them. There is no other reason to specify ONLY "minoritized students" unless you WANT to be able to exclude "non-minoritized" students. And guess who gets to define the terms?
The capitalist bosses are defining the terms from behind the scene. Decisions made today will determine who gets a seat in the privileged positions of the fake meritocracy.
@josephsimmons9241 Nothing like ignoring a perfectly legitimate question so you can spend time conjuring up your own characterization of another person. Tell me, do women need "inclusion promotion" or "protections?"
Two thirds of Californians oppose what their own government is doing. With that kind of majority, why do have that government? Why do they refuse to do a better job of voting?
Summary of the key points: • A California community college document outlines new DEI standards for evaluating and implementing curriculum, which concerns professors due to vague language open to interpretation. • Terms like "anti-racist" and "intersectionality" mean different things to different people, making it hard to know how to apply them objectively. • Efforts to incorporate DEI risk distracting from core instructional content and wasting limited classroom time. • There is irony in highly-paid college administrators pushing DEI reforms while faculty pay lags and students struggle financially. • California state universities also have issues with disproportionate administrator pay raises compared to faculty. • Glossary definitions of "collectivism" and "individualism" show bias, and imposing any ideological conformity on academics is disturbing. • While some views can be criticized, all individuals have a right to decide what to believe without institutional imposition. • Organizations like FIRE play an important role in defending academic freedom and freedom of expression on college campuses from compelled speech or viewpoint conformity. -Anthropic Claude-instant-100k
Parents do not have more rights in California. A kid can have their name and pronouns changed at school without informing a parent. California is a “sanctuary” state for minors that wish to change their gender (I feel silly even writing “change gender” as if) and their parents object.
We must not forget that what brought us out of the oppressive "Age of Faith" was the Age of Reason--FACTS, EMPIRICISM. The woke marxists know this, and so they push feelings and lies--the only way they can take over and institute another 'dark age' of oppression.
Collectivism is basically the idea that individuals only purpose is to serve an enforced collectivist ideology. Think of an ant colony. Individualism is basically the idea that individuals are free to choose, without collectivist enforcement.
By the early 1990s, annual reports and prospectus from public companies were full of double speak and mumbo-jumbo. SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt demanded the use of plain English in documents. Crap like “our platform has enabled a paradigm shift in retail innovation” became “we make inventory software for stores”. Present day academic consultants and administrators need the same kick in the pants.
i taught my daughter to read. she was reading sight words on flash cards at 10 months old because its just memorization. she's still advanced in reading and math skills because she was taught young, at home.
@@damionkeeling3103 yes! its also the best time to teach other languages when they are learning to speak their native tongues, too. many people born outside the u.s. are bilingual at least because most foreign schools teach english in grade school along with their native languages.
My grandparents learned long division in the 1st grade in the late 1920. I wasn’t taught long division in 4th grade in 1990. I couldn’t understand why American kids would be considered so much less competent in my time than they were in the 1920s.
If a group can successfully make laws subjective or change the meaning of the words in the laws after the fact they can make anyone a criminal, sending strict and terrifying messages to others. The early Ingsoc higher party likely was this successful.
This is some straight up bullish!t! There are waaaaay better things to spend time and money on. A few words come to mind, divisive, blackmail, victim, anti-resilience. What a grift.
From an AI - not chatGPT as it has been neutered - on individualism and collectivism: Individualism, the belief in the importance and value of the individual and their rights and freedoms, is a cornerstone of a free and prosperous society. It recognizes that each person is unique and possesses their own set of skills, talents, and desires, and that it is through the pursuit of their own individual goals and aspirations that society as a whole benefits. Collectivism, on the other hand, prioritizes the needs of the group over the needs of the individual. It often involves the suppression of individual rights and freedoms in the name of achieving a perceived greater good, which is often determined by the government or other authority figures. Individualism promotes innovation and creativity, as individuals are free to pursue their own ideas and dreams without being constrained by the expectations of others. This has led to many of the advances and innovations that have made our world a better place, from the invention of the steam engine to the development of the internet. Collectivism can stifle innovation and creativity, as individuals are often discouraged from thinking outside the box or pursuing their own goals and aspirations. It can also lead to the suppression of dissenting opinions and the silencing of those who challenge the status quo. Individualism also recognizes the importance of personal responsibility and accountability, as individuals are encouraged to take ownership of their own lives and decisions. This leads to a society in which people are self-reliant, responsible, and committed to making a positive impact in their communities. Collectivism can promote a sense of dependency and entitlement, as individuals may come to expect the government or other authority figures to solve their problems for them. This can lead to a society in which people are less self-reliant and less committed to making a positive impact in their communities. In conclusion, individualism is a powerful force for good in society, promoting the value and importance of the individual and their rights and freedoms. It encourages innovation, creativity, and personal responsibility, leading to a society that is free, prosperous, and committed to making a positive impact in the world.
The human species is collectivist by nature. You don't see any libertarians going out in the jungle and living like male orangutans swinging from tree to tree eating low hanging fruit do you?.Each individual is somewhat different do to sexual reproduction, the division of labor and where and when they lived. What distinguishes man from animal is the use of labor to make a life for ourselves and our species. For to enable the creation of all culture Science, Art and even Religion man must first be able to eat drink and have shelter. The change from the animalist life and the primitive communism of the hunter gathers to the agricultural peoples required the creation of a small ruling class to make decisions on how to use the surplus agriculture created and defend it from war by war. They abolished cannibalism and replaced it with slavery. The agricultural peoples created the domestic animals and domestic plants out of the nature itself. One half of the plant food we eat today was created by the Native Americans. So when some says they created a new GMO well you can say that Native peoples created Corn and Potatoes. The problem with the neoliberal theories of private individuals doing the work of the gods in their individual pursuit of profits is that it is completely historically inaccurate. The Internet, GPS and even the moon landing were all developed and paid for with tax money allocated for the cold war with the Soviet Union. With the loss of the monopoly on the atom bomb which itself required a vast government paid for and directed industrial complex money would pore into education, universities and industry like water to gain a first strike capability in an insane arms race right up to Reagan's presidency and the implosion of the Soviet Union.
@@StudyQubic "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It's as true today as when it was written.
@@BobDingus-bh3pdNor does it mean the exaggeration of individual interests like the goal of trying to turn everything into individual private property when even the capitalist have and act with collective interests. Many corporations have multiple owners. Just as we have class and individual interest so do they. Their small group needs to keep their crisis wracked system from getting out of control which history shows them unable to do. The set up the Federal Reserve after a private banking crisis that required JP Morgan to bail others out. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned federally chartered Bank. The Paris commune was the first workers state. It was produced by the Franco Prussia war. It lasted about 70 days before the workers were slaughtered by counter revolutionary forces. The capitalist need an ever growing state to arbitrate every dispute and grievance in their favor. The favor of an ever shrinking minority. Their sole concern is profits as seen in accounting books. It's relatively easy to show that the profit is just surplus value produced by labor in an industrial company. The taxes collected by the capitalist for their government are also part of the system that recognizes that all things can not simple be turned into commodities and sold in a market. If your going to use the police and army its been decided that its much better to put a democratic facade on their actions. As for things like education and healthcare the capitalist view those not as something upon which humanity builds and creates for itself but things to be monopolized and minimized into the hands of a few since their are either an overhead cost or an indirect drag on profits though taxes. Then you have a combination of the bank, the landlord and the government all demanding that tribute be paid for housing and farmland regardless of income to them as if we were still serfs from the middle ages.
Subjectivism which must be interpreted by expensive self-appointed experts to guide those below them toward their intolerant and bigoted view of their extremely critical subjective theory.
Here is the thing. If you have been teaching long enough, (I have been teaching for 30 years,) then you know the education system comes up with new ways to teach ever few years. This too shall pass.
@@QED_ Also said by 30 year teachers in Ancient Greece and Rome. Look, I'm not saying DEI is good. I don't like it either, but most teachers ignore this sort of fluff as a passing fad, and just do their job as best they can.
Collectivism is just the glittering generality used when authoritarians want to take from one group of INDIVIDUALS they don't like that includes you and give that to their preferred anointed group of INDIVIDUALS. Individualism is the belief that all individuals should benefit from a free society and that society exists such that the individuals that comprise that society benefit from participation in that society. Collectivism is the belief that some individuals are more important than other individuals and that the former should be given preferential treatment over and at the expense of the latter group of "bad" individuals.
The people who are cited to explain collectivism also give a balanced definition for individualism. Furthermore the people cited are at the forefront of cultural psychology involving individualism/collectivism. It is telling that these people didn't use the same papers that described collectivism to also describe individualism.
We got a company wide email to never buy premium gas with the company card for company vehicles. It turns out one employee has been putting it in her vehicle every time because the ambulance with 250,000 miles was "high performance".
i might devote an entire class to this docoment. Give the students each a copy. Read through it together and discuss from their point of view, mine, and discuss its relevence the to subject of the class. At the very least, they would be informed of what is being asked of me and what they are to be subjected to.
Don’t we live in devolved collectivism society. Instead of forced quota with an equal return for everyone, people put in what they want and get back out a proportional benefit.
that is not the definition of collectivism or of individualism, wow. they are changing as much of the language and education as possible to make it impossible for individuals to reason and communicate.
"Watering up" is grooming children to come to the conclusions you want them to instead of "watering them down" by telling them, for instance, that "a grown up touching your no no spot is bad". It's essentially ill-intentioned teachers getting around these recent parents' demands about _what's_ taught by claiming they aren't teaching anything, "the students are asking things _they_ want to understand". As for the bias in the collectivism versus individualism, that's hardly a surprise. Equity has always been communism rebranded in such a way to sneak past the sensibilities of a west that supposedly knew better.
heaven forbid people teach grown adults different ideas and leave it up to those adults to think critically and make up their own minds. "Control what people are taught" is not a libertarian principle. If people want to be stupid that is their right. If you don't like what a school teaches don't go there. Don't like teaching there don't teach there. It's that simple.
@@lynnex17 Not everything that is funded by taxes is subject to your individual wants and desires. Move to Florida if it's so bothersome. No one is making you pay CA taxes.
@@Upsideroundor he can vote for people who would not fund programs in their state I don't think anyone said it should be banned outright so strange way to phrase that , just that they do not want it funded by taxpayers in their personal opinion. You can start a private institution and teach whatever nonsense you want. Beyond that all states certainly get some kind of federal funding even if it is a small amount compared to the bigger picture, so your comments premise of moving to another state in of itself isn't exactly correct.
Sure; there is a Great Income Disparity between the Administrators and the Teachers, and Teachers should be paid more; but, if you can't teach in an empathetic manner to a diverse group of students; perhaps you shouldn't be teaching.
Chemistry is chemistry. Reality does not change because of your race. If you aren't willing to challenge your diverse students, then perhaps you shouldn't be teaching.
I agree this is stupid, but why are you pulling out the Marxist boogeyman? Marxism is about economic organization / mode of production. How is DEI Marxist? It seems more capitalistic to me. A lot of companies and people have made much money off of DEI programs.
It’s Cultural Marxism, which lefties say is a conspiracy theory. Here’s one definition: Cultural Marxism is an insistence upon political correctness, multiculturalism, and perpetual attacks on the foundations of culture: the nuclear family, marriage, patriotism, traditional morality, gender, law and order, etc. Cultural Marxists are committed to establishing economic Marxism, in which case their cultural attacks are a necessary preparation for their ultimate goal. Breaking down the fabric of society is imperative and they partition people into specific groups to be identified as victims and perpetrators, causing anger and distrust. When a country is so divided, less favorable economic ideology can be implemented through a bloodless coup. Other definitions abound, but it seems like it’s true that together we stand, divided we fall.
Brainwashing. My corporation had DEI training and the corporate trainer actually said "you can't have too many white men in the meeting room". The training room had 8 people of color and 2 whites. A majority were appalled at the comment. When challenged the trainer went on to name our CEO and say he is all in and says if you are not then you need to find another job elsewhere. This at one of the if not the nations largest wholesaler. You see less qualified and talented individuals getting jobs based on DEI rather than merit and its obvious. All of management below facility leaders, a vast majority non white, believe fully in merit. As Dr. Martin Luther King implied and said we want people to judge by content of character rather than color of skin...or gender or gender preference. Corporations as well as schools have gone off their collective rockers.
The communists got us.
Non whites are just as capable
"...inclusive environment for MINORITIZED students..."
They INTENTIONALLY and EXPLICILTLY refuse to include "non-minoritized" students in this. Why? So they can discriminate against them.
There is no other reason to specify ONLY "minoritized students" unless you WANT to be able to exclude "non-minoritized" students.
And guess who gets to define the terms?
The capitalist bosses are defining the terms from behind the scene. Decisions made today will determine who gets a seat in the privileged positions of the fake meritocracy.
Dont be so dense
@@josephsimmons9241 You explain why it was otherwise necessary to include an unnecessary word.
@@DeadlyPlatypus you must be one of those "straight pride" types. By definition, the majority does not need inclusion promotions or protections.
@josephsimmons9241 Nothing like ignoring a perfectly legitimate question so you can spend time conjuring up your own characterization of another person.
Tell me, do women need "inclusion promotion" or "protections?"
Two thirds of Californians oppose what their own government is doing. With that kind of majority, why do have that government? Why do they refuse to do a better job of voting?
Summary of the key points:
• A California community college document outlines new DEI standards for evaluating and implementing curriculum, which concerns professors due to vague language open to interpretation.
• Terms like "anti-racist" and "intersectionality" mean different things to different people, making it hard to know how to apply them objectively.
• Efforts to incorporate DEI risk distracting from core instructional content and wasting limited classroom time.
• There is irony in highly-paid college administrators pushing DEI reforms while faculty pay lags and students struggle financially.
• California state universities also have issues with disproportionate administrator pay raises compared to faculty.
• Glossary definitions of "collectivism" and "individualism" show bias, and imposing any ideological conformity on academics is disturbing.
• While some views can be criticized, all individuals have a right to decide what to believe without institutional imposition.
• Organizations like FIRE play an important role in defending academic freedom and freedom of expression on college campuses from compelled speech or viewpoint conformity.
-Anthropic Claude-instant-100k
They need help. This needs to go to SCOTUS as quickly as possible.
but what about muh states rights😢
@@me-fp3cgParents have more rights. And states don't have the right to mutilate children.
Parents do not have more rights in California. A kid can have their name and pronouns changed at school without informing a parent. California is a “sanctuary” state for minors that wish to change their gender (I feel silly even writing “change gender” as if) and their parents object.
You do realize the state is pushing all of this right? The ruling elite class is forcing this on us and poisoning children….
This is a return to the Middle Ages when the Church would dictate its ideology and failure to adhere would be severely punished.
We must not forget that what brought us out of the oppressive "Age of Faith" was the Age of Reason--FACTS, EMPIRICISM. The woke marxists know this, and so they push feelings and lies--the only way they can take over and institute another 'dark age' of oppression.
Collectivism is basically the idea that individuals only purpose is to serve an enforced collectivist ideology. Think of an ant colony.
Individualism is basically the idea that individuals are free to choose, without collectivist enforcement.
@El-Harto Perhaps cooperative would be a better word for this instance.
By the early 1990s, annual reports and prospectus from public companies were full of double speak and mumbo-jumbo. SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt demanded the use of plain English in documents. Crap like “our platform has enabled a paradigm shift in retail innovation” became “we make inventory software for stores”. Present day academic consultants and administrators need the same kick in the pants.
LMAO.
The problem is, if they put it in plain English then everybody would be able to see how bad it really is.
i taught my daughter to read. she was reading sight words on flash cards at 10 months old because its just memorization. she's still advanced in reading and math skills because she was taught young, at home.
@@damionkeeling3103 yes! its also the best time to teach other languages when they are learning to speak their native tongues, too. many people born outside the u.s. are bilingual at least because most foreign schools teach english in grade school along with their native languages.
My grandparents learned long division in the 1st grade in the late 1920. I wasn’t taught long division in 4th grade in 1990. I couldn’t understand why American kids would be considered so much less competent in my time than they were in the 1920s.
Commiefornia being Commiefornia.
If a group can successfully make laws subjective or change the meaning of the words in the laws after the fact they can make anyone a criminal, sending strict and terrifying messages to others. The early Ingsoc higher party likely was this successful.
This is some straight up bullish!t! There are waaaaay better things to spend time and money on. A few words come to mind, divisive, blackmail, victim, anti-resilience. What a grift.
As soon as they're alone, they'll tell your kids how they can be "special" if they use different pronouns.
From an AI - not chatGPT as it has been neutered - on individualism and collectivism:
Individualism, the belief in the importance and value of the individual and their rights and freedoms, is a cornerstone of a free and prosperous society. It recognizes that each person is unique and possesses their own set of skills, talents, and desires, and that it is through the pursuit of their own individual goals and aspirations that society as a whole benefits.
Collectivism, on the other hand, prioritizes the needs of the group over the needs of the individual. It often involves the suppression of individual rights and freedoms in the name of achieving a perceived greater good, which is often determined by the government or other authority figures.
Individualism promotes innovation and creativity, as individuals are free to pursue their own ideas and dreams without being constrained by the expectations of others. This has led to many of the advances and innovations that have made our world a better place, from the invention of the steam engine to the development of the internet.
Collectivism can stifle innovation and creativity, as individuals are often discouraged from thinking outside the box or pursuing their own goals and aspirations. It can also lead to the suppression of dissenting opinions and the silencing of those who challenge the status quo.
Individualism also recognizes the importance of personal responsibility and accountability, as individuals are encouraged to take ownership of their own lives and decisions. This leads to a society in which people are self-reliant, responsible, and committed to making a positive impact in their communities.
Collectivism can promote a sense of dependency and entitlement, as individuals may come to expect the government or other authority figures to solve their problems for them. This can lead to a society in which people are less self-reliant and less committed to making a positive impact in their communities.
In conclusion, individualism is a powerful force for good in society, promoting the value and importance of the individual and their rights and freedoms. It encourages innovation, creativity, and personal responsibility, leading to a society that is free, prosperous, and committed to making a positive impact in the world.
The human species is collectivist by nature. You don't see any libertarians going out in the jungle and living like male orangutans swinging from tree to tree eating low hanging fruit do you?.Each individual is somewhat different do to sexual reproduction, the division of labor and where and when they lived. What distinguishes man from animal is the use of labor to make a life for ourselves and our species. For to enable the creation of all culture Science, Art and even Religion man must first be able to eat drink and have shelter. The change from the animalist life and the primitive communism of the hunter gathers to the agricultural peoples required the creation of a small ruling class to make decisions on how to use the surplus agriculture created and defend it from war by war. They abolished cannibalism and replaced it with slavery. The agricultural peoples created the domestic animals and domestic plants out of the nature itself. One half of the plant food we eat today was created by the Native Americans. So when some says they created a new GMO well you can say that Native peoples created Corn and Potatoes. The problem with the neoliberal theories of private individuals doing the work of the gods in their individual pursuit of profits is that it is completely historically inaccurate. The Internet, GPS and even the moon landing were all developed and paid for with tax money allocated for the cold war with the Soviet Union. With the loss of the monopoly on the atom bomb which itself required a vast government paid for and directed industrial complex money would pore into education, universities and industry like water to gain a first strike capability in an insane arms race right up to Reagan's presidency and the implosion of the Soviet Union.
@@kimobrien. How do you see the Second Amendment?
@@StudyQubic "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It's as true today as when it was written.
@@kimobrien.the human species is not collectivist by nature. Group cooperation doesn’t automatically mean suppression of individual interests.
@@BobDingus-bh3pdNor does it mean the exaggeration of individual interests like the goal of trying to turn everything into individual private property when even the capitalist have and act with collective interests. Many corporations have multiple owners. Just as we have class and individual interest so do they. Their small group needs to keep their crisis wracked system from getting out of control which history shows them unable to do. The set up the Federal Reserve after a private banking crisis that required JP Morgan to bail others out. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned federally chartered Bank. The Paris commune was the first workers state. It was produced by the Franco Prussia war. It lasted about 70 days before the workers were slaughtered by counter revolutionary forces. The capitalist need an ever growing state to arbitrate every dispute and grievance in their favor. The favor of an ever shrinking minority. Their sole concern is profits as seen in accounting books. It's relatively easy to show that the profit is just surplus value produced by labor in an industrial company. The taxes collected by the capitalist for their government are also part of the system that recognizes that all things can not simple be turned into commodities and sold in a market. If your going to use the police and army its been decided that its much better to put a democratic facade on their actions. As for things like education and healthcare the capitalist view those not as something upon which humanity builds and creates for itself but things to be monopolized and minimized into the hands of a few since their are either an overhead cost or an indirect drag on profits though taxes. Then you have a combination of the bank, the landlord and the government all demanding that tribute be paid for housing and farmland regardless of income to them as if we were still serfs from the middle ages.
Another reason to move out of California.
Collectivism is a philosophy for people who don't have enough RAM to judge people as individuals.
Right on brother, a pox on helping others.
@@amraceway Non-sequitor.
@@FourthRoot Bit like how your brain works.
@@amraceway Whatever helps you feel better.
@@FourthRoot Using all my RAM. Great for detecting the selfish and self -absorbed. No i in team my little buddy.
Just tell me how many pieces of anti racism flair I need to wear.
Ya gotta go above the minimum though.
Word salad of self-importance
Subjectivism which must be interpreted by expensive self-appointed experts to guide those below them toward their intolerant and bigoted view of their extremely critical subjective theory.
I pray this guy wins.
Example if you’re on the left, you’re more depressed. If you’re on the right, you’re less depressed Google it.
Here is the thing. If you have been teaching long enough, (I have been teaching for 30 years,) then you know the education system comes up with new ways to teach ever few years. This too shall pass.
. .. said 30 year teachers in Germany in 1933.
@@QED_ Also said by 30 year teachers in Ancient Greece and Rome. Look, I'm not saying DEI is good. I don't like it either, but most teachers ignore this sort of fluff as a passing fad, and just do their job as best they can.
That is racism. Any time a person is valued or devalued by their race, that is racism.
Collectivism is just the glittering generality used when authoritarians want to take from one group of INDIVIDUALS they don't like that includes you and give that to their preferred anointed group of INDIVIDUALS. Individualism is the belief that all individuals should benefit from a free society and that society exists such that the individuals that comprise that society benefit from participation in that society. Collectivism is the belief that some individuals are more important than other individuals and that the former should be given preferential treatment over and at the expense of the latter group of "bad" individuals.
Oh neat, collectivism and it’s inevitable draw towards diminishing individual rights
The people who are cited to explain collectivism also give a balanced definition for individualism. Furthermore the people cited are at the forefront of cultural psychology involving individualism/collectivism. It is telling that these people didn't use the same papers that described collectivism to also describe individualism.
Water Down_gravity? 😊
Love your journalism 💧
🌎
We got a company wide email to never buy premium gas with the company card for company vehicles. It turns out one employee has been putting it in her vehicle every time because the ambulance with 250,000 miles was "high performance".
DEMOCRATS.
Obviously, you would use the definitions of the higher ranking faculty, or the one least likely to be fired. Very Machiavellian.
Oh sure, you and all of your books.
But Jesus 👑 is the only way ❣️🙏 for the simple folk.
Love never Fails 💖
The trick is to to not let people learn what is Marx and Hegel politics. So when they rebrand/rename it, it wouldn’t be recognized as such
Golly you should write the curriculum then nobody will have any idea what anything is.
i might devote an entire class to this docoment. Give the students each a copy. Read through it together and discuss from their point of view, mine, and discuss its relevence the to subject of the class. At the very least, they would be informed of what is being asked of me and what they are to be subjected to.
We love SB 17 in Texas 🤠 Forced DEI training becomes illegal Jan. 2024 ❤
Don’t we live in devolved collectivism society. Instead of forced quota with an equal return for everyone, people put in what they want and get back out a proportional benefit.
My, my... Liz Wolfe is very lovely young lady. If my daughter turns out only half as well spoken as she, I will be a proud father.
I guess you didn't see her RFK Jr Hit piece...
@@Kazekoge101 no I did not
How to be a better slave 😂
that is not the definition of collectivism or of individualism, wow. they are changing as much of the language and education as possible to make it impossible for individuals to reason and communicate.
How is "race conscious" and "anti-racism" goes together. It is rather a cynical contradiction.
This is fascism. Putting race first in everything?! Jesus help us.
Our problems have all for the most part arisen from and can be laid on the academic world’s threshold, far outpacing the political influences.
Collectivist grandfathered in but defended against migrating here
55% of the Libertarian party has gone woke. It's really amazing
I just can’t. The guy bill is driving
You should ask President Ortega how to handle educational institutions that get out of line.
They want to fix the problem they have to get rid of the board of education i that will help fix the problem
What's next, teamwork and sharing?
Rollerblading, rampant crime, and safe injection sites
“Teamwork” and “sharing” by force (speech compulsion and suppression, threat of firing, etc.) is not the high ground you characterize it to be.
"Watering up" is grooming children to come to the conclusions you want them to instead of "watering them down" by telling them, for instance, that "a grown up touching your no no spot is bad". It's essentially ill-intentioned teachers getting around these recent parents' demands about _what's_ taught by claiming they aren't teaching anything, "the students are asking things _they_ want to understand".
As for the bias in the collectivism versus individualism, that's hardly a surprise. Equity has always been communism rebranded in such a way to sneak past the sensibilities of a west that supposedly knew better.
💕
heaven forbid people teach grown adults different ideas and leave it up to those adults to think critically and make up their own minds. "Control what people are taught" is not a libertarian principle. If people want to be stupid that is their right. If you don't like what a school teaches don't go there. Don't like teaching there don't teach there. It's that simple.
Critical theory is the antithesis to critical thinking.
@@mustang607 What does that have to do with anything I said?
We are forced to fund all this with taxes, so have no option to withdraw funding
@@lynnex17 Not everything that is funded by taxes is subject to your individual wants and desires. Move to Florida if it's so bothersome. No one is making you pay CA taxes.
@@Upsideroundor he can vote for people who would not fund programs in their state I don't think anyone said it should be banned outright so strange way to phrase that , just that they do not want it funded by taxpayers in their personal opinion. You can start a private institution and teach whatever nonsense you want. Beyond that all states certainly get some kind of federal funding even if it is a small amount compared to the bigger picture, so your comments premise of moving to another state in of itself isn't exactly correct.
Sure; there is a Great Income Disparity between the Administrators and the Teachers, and Teachers should be paid more; but, if you can't teach in an empathetic manner to a diverse group of students; perhaps you shouldn't be teaching.
Chemistry is chemistry. Reality does not change because of your race. If you aren't willing to challenge your diverse students, then perhaps you shouldn't be teaching.
😭😭😭 No more whining without offering solutions. If you don't like how the Federal Reserve empire is run, then build your own.
I agree this is stupid, but why are you pulling out the Marxist boogeyman? Marxism is about economic organization / mode of production. How is DEI Marxist? It seems more capitalistic to me. A lot of companies and people have made much money off of DEI programs.
It’s Cultural Marxism, which lefties say is a conspiracy theory. Here’s one definition: Cultural Marxism is an insistence upon political correctness, multiculturalism, and perpetual attacks on the foundations of culture: the nuclear family, marriage, patriotism, traditional morality, gender, law and order, etc. Cultural Marxists are committed to establishing economic Marxism, in which case their cultural attacks are a necessary preparation for their ultimate goal. Breaking down the fabric of society is imperative and they partition people into specific groups to be identified as victims and perpetrators, causing anger and distrust. When a country is so divided, less favorable economic ideology can be implemented through a bloodless coup.
Other definitions abound, but it seems like it’s true that together we stand, divided we fall.
Cause Marxism is at its core “us can’t them so kill then so we can finally be free”
DEI has similar principles but hasn’t gone genocidal quite yet