Collecting data is way easier than delivering quality education. Also that the areas that'd most benefit from funding are the ones with the least funding.
Could it be because educational standards are on a state by state basis? Massachusetts educational requirement compared to FLs is a day and night difference. If anything, there should be a fed standard for each grade level instead of moms for liberty karens dictating what’s acceptable literature (when they haven’t read any of it themselves).
Everyone keeps saying this but literally DoE has no control over local test scores. But sure gut it. Im sure that's why my small rural city is closing up schools cause there isn't enough funding.
Student test scores have gone down since the department of education was created. 50 different departments means that states will have freedom to create policies to suit their needs. States will see what is working in other states and adopt those policies.
@@Nemerson74 Just basic literacy. If you look at dollars spent per student compared against literacy and math, there's no correlation. I believe it's Baltimore SD that spends nearly the most money per student of any county in America, and most of their kids can't read at age-appropriate levels. Scary stuff. More money doesn't mean better education. To put a finer point on it... more money can't make a kid have a good culture at home or his community. It can't make him care about education. And that's the real root of the issue.
@@Nemerson74 The real trend that is alarming is that only about 4% of colleges require the SAT or ACT. About 60% of students graduating high school do not bother with either. They have changed the SAT scoring many times since I graduated, I doubt I know what a "good" score is these days.
@@Nemerson74 If the US is anything like the UK then they've just made exams easier over time and/or just give out higher grades for the same performance.
I really appreciate this. My kids attend private schools, and I believe they have an edge over those educated in public schools. This is a great opportunity for those who can maintain their advantages.
@PicturesofTravel Public schools are funded by the state you live in, not the DoE. Unless you get free or reduced lunch, or the children have special needs or disabilities. And the state you live in also sets the curriculum, not the DoE
@@Merriwether-w8kno need to prove the connection. It can be proven by the DoE's mission in the first place, which was not to improve anyone's education at all, but to make sure that predominantly black schools were getting the same funding as predominantly white schools in the same area. When that was accomplished they moved on to other "equality" metrics and never "improvement" metrics. If "white" scores were going down, they saw it as positive if black scores weren't going down as fast.
USA public education has been corrupted probably way before department of education was implemented. So with that being said what does gutted the funds of that possibly remove that away from youths education with no real answers replace it with something that actually empowered intellectual minds in the youth in public schools help them? Because if not I'm just seeing what he do towards that in particular as a bad than good thing. 🤦🏾♂️
Why does the government have all this personal information on us in the first place? I find that to be more offensive than shutting down the Department of Education
Spoiler alert - when you get a govt security clearance you fork over all you personal data and sign mountains of privacy waivers then the govt. data (formerly your data) gets hacked and sold. Been there done that.
When the president doesn't do his job, it's up to congress to step up and hold him accountable, when congress doesn't do their job, the people will form a populist movement to send in a bully figure like Trump, and after everything's been shaken up, hopefully the government will reset and have a fresh start and work properly again
The bully will rob everyone blind and take away everyone civil rights then he will get on a plane - you destroyed AMerica - now factor in AI - so f-ing dum - smh
What does the Department of Education actually do? States/local pay teachers. States/local buy books and build buildings. States build and staff campuses at every level of education. Education programs at almost every university have techniques. I can understand its existence if we knew what it did? What does it do? I know what a bunch of the other agencies do, but what about education?
I very much want to see a President sign an executive order that goes something like this. No executive agency may impose (or seek to impose through judicial due process) a financial or criminal penalty on any entity unless both the penalty and the offense are expressly defined in an Act of Congress (with specific and narrow exceptions for federal employees). The intent being to unilaterally end the regulatory deep state and push legislative responsibilities back on Congress. After hearing his point in this video I now want Congress to pass such a law.
@@criticalwokeracisttheory4645Yeah because none of those things existed before the DOE right? If you think that you are completely wrong. Eliminating the department will not eliminate the services it will eliminate the massive bureaucracy making that stuff far more expensive than it needs to be. Although getting rid of 90% of student loans would be a great start too since the people taking them out apparently aren’t getting any value out of them. There, now you know so you can stop embarrassing yourself.
Lots of complaining about the DOE but at NO POINT did any of you explain how getting rid of the department of education improves things. Sure you cut spending, but how is that a benefit to the average American?
@natmurray3391 I actually want to add on to what you said. The DoE is normally 2% of the budget (4% last year partially due to the loan forgiveness), so it wouldn't actually do much in taxes for most people. But their largest funding expenditures are on Pell Grants for college and federal student loans, whose interest rates are set by Congress.
@chrisrobertson9264 you sound like somebody from the Department of Education that was embezzling from the children they were basically supposed to be teaching
IT MUST BE SO HARD TO BE A WOMAN, THIS OLD, THIS INCOMPETENT, AND HAVE YOUR BOSS CUT YOU LOOSE. “THANK YOU SO MUCH PRESIDENT TRUMP”, FOR HELPING AMERICANS DRAIN THIS TERRIBLE SWAMP. DKS, just an American.
no united states department should be unionized! taxpayer funds pay for everything, so unions go against citizens. states should be responsible and accountable for educating its children, with parents.
So much Federal money goes to local schools (with ideological strings attached) that local budgets depend upon. That should never have happened in the first place.
@@gsbarlow4 He knows awfully well what the threat of one can get done. You aren’t going to get any traction with this awesome put down you think you’ve got. I’d recommend you stop embarrassing yourself.
Mass teacher layoffs across the country, no more student loans, buses, lunches. I am all for cutting costs but this will affect millions across the country. There is no way Republicans win again in Congress if this gets cut.
@ You again, not a thing you said here is true, stop it. No one has lunches or buses before DOE, it’s hard to believe that you could believe that. Student loans are absolute garbage anyway but still not dependent on the DOE. I know DOE provides some funding for teachers but not nearly enough to cause mass layoffs< that is a flat out lie. Get rid of the bureaucracy.
They are supposed to have three branches as a means of stopping them from tyranny but the way they are doing it a unitary government would be less tyrannical.
All I see is more trump W's. While he is still not a libertarian himself, Trump has done for libertarian causes than at least all the presidents I've seen in my life.
I don't get your comment right here.. so he is not a libertarian himself but his politic moves as elected government representative mostly are? doesn't that contradict itself? maybe you have bad understanding of definition ("libertarian") or his politics are not that much liberterian at all.. I forget to mention I'm big supporter of president Trump
Agreed that Congress should act. And when they act, they should try to find something in Article 1 Section 8, authorizing Congress to control education at all…
the year is 2035, and thanks to the gutting of a department that made up less than 2% of the national budget, the United Sates of America is still running a deficit. Luckily test scores have fallen and critical thinking skills have plummeted to a new low, every child in Alabama knows the 10 commandments but not a single thing about science, math or history.
Robby Soave is a perfect example of one of the libertarian-conservative wings of the party type who was a fence sitting / non Trump supporting guys who's totally eating crow now about Trump. We told you so Robby.
Here's what would most likely happen if the DoE went away. Education would fall on each individual state (as it should). I remember seeing the testing scores of all the states when i was in school. Each one had their strengths and weaknesses, but the answer was another one size fits all curriculum (common core). Whole lotta good that did. They've even gotten rid of teaching phonics and replaced it with sight words. They've taken away life skills (Home economics, wood working, auto shops, etc!) The DoE has done nothing but increase how much the taxpayer spends on each individual student, which has not yielded any positive outcomes (like, an increase in literacy or math competency).
@@Merriwether-w8k We didn't elect any of trumps cabinet either. Or the Supreme Court. Or the DoE or any other federal mess of an organization. There's nothing precluding the president from using anyone in an advisory role. Elon isn't doing anything to the government, he's auditing on behalf of the executive branch.
This may be a bit out of place, but we should also consider what sort of "tests" are these that we give children nowadays. It is mind boggling to me that average kindergartener has 2 hours of homework daily and a child must read and write before they can go into 1st grade. People, the computers have gotten smarter, but please don't forget that humans have not biologically started developing faster. We are slowly abolishing childhood by forcing children to learn more and at much younger age than ever before. This is so harmful to children!
The sad part is that it took this long for anyone to Audit them and notice the corruption, Government needs to be held accountable for spending and abuse of power.
Is it just me, or are the things that Randi Weingarten said at the beginning just do not make any sense at all? They are all English words, but they do not make any sense in the order she used them.
If it can lawfully be done, gut the DoEd by fiat now and three years from now, we can go to the Hill and say, “Hey, have you noticed how little we miss the DoEd? Let’s make that permanent.”
I do question why they're blaming test scores on the DoE when states set their own curriculums. The DoE funds a lot of the services for special needs, low income, and students with disabilities. I can't imagine states wanting to pick up that slack, when the funding mechanisms they use for the schools are at least partially responsible for the lack of equity in education access those groups experience.
The error is in thinking that money will solve those problems to begin with. Or even if it would solve the problem, the error is thinking that a federal bureaucracy is the most efficient distribution method.
@SeraphsWitness But if the federal bureaucracy doesn't work, what makes anybody think 50 individual state bureaucracies would do any better? That's assuming that the states would pick up that slack at all. The majority of its spending goes to federal aid programs for colleges. And there's not particularly convincing evidence that privatizing education is an effective solution
@@josephplatt7622 State control is always better than Federal control on this (and most) issues. It's smaller and more localized. Power should almost always be delegated to the smallest possible relational unit. My kids go to a charter school, which operates on taxpayer money but has control of curricular decisions. The leftists in our county hate it because they can't precisely control it... but the reality is in the outcome: Our students are miles ahead of the state average in every metric. Because it's *locally controlled*. And we spend LESS per student. There's no "slack" to pick up. The DoE was doing nothing. Less than nothing. No convincing evidence? Besides all the evidence? Private education consistently outperforms public education. Homeschooling even more so. How can you say there's no evidence? A voucher system is not a bad idea, that way parents can choose where to spend their vouchers, and schools will have to compete in convincing parents that their school is best.
@@josephplatt7622 That funding was there before the DoE, it was run through the SSA. Getting rid of the DoE bureaucracy will not get rid of that funding, it should free up more of it. This is a huge lie by the drones trying to preserve their jobs and democrats that needs to be called out.
@@SeraphsWitnessI still don't agree on state control being better in most cases, they're just as capable of screwing it up for everybody, and tend to be less representative where voter turnout is low. Like local school board elections, or any election that falls out of presidential elections. It took me a while to find studies. The NHERI did warn their results on homeschooling weren't conclusive. The old one from the NAEP suggested private schools rarely performed better once you factored in student characteristics. The new ones with data from 2022 do support your argument better, but you mentioned a public charter school, which didnt look much better in reading/math than public schools. Private catholic schools seem to do better, but interestingly when filtered for economically disadvantaged students, there wasn't enough data for private schools, catholic or otherwise. And all groups take less disabled students than public schools. I'm genuinely glad your kids are doing well where they are. I like the idea of having more flexible curriculums and having public charters boarded by locals. I just don't think demolishing DoE would help any of that.
Also, I hope that Trump is “flooding the zone” and the people who would sue over *each* EO are too spread thin, exhausted, and impoverished to sue of *all* the EOs. Maybe they will be able to rescue some pointless programs here and there but most of the Waste State will be swept into the dustbin of history.
Going to be harder to get rid of DEI in education if you get rid of the department that has leverage on schools and colleges. I'd rather keep the department and use strings attached to FAFSA to pressure colleges to end DEI.
Trump needs to cut the federal budget bullshtt, and then write down a list of names of the people who get all the CNN MSNBC interviews, and then cut their favorite programs as well
Here's what would most likely happen if the DoE went away. Education would fall on each individual state (as it should). I remember seeing the testing scores of all the states when i was in school. Each one had their strengths and weaknesses, but the answer was another one size fits all curriculum (common core). Whole lotta good that did. They've even gotten rid of teaching phonics and replaced it with sight words. They've taken away life skills (Home economics, wood working, auto shops, etc!) The DoE has done nothing but increase how much the taxpayer spends on each individual student, which has not yielded any positive outcomes (like, an increase in literacy or math competency).
Subscribe to www.youtube.com/@reasonFreeMedia to watch this show in the future!
1:10 Does she not know that everyone in the Department of Education is unelected??
no, she is just a propaganda agent. was wondering why people used her phrase on reddit yesterday.
Word..
No, I think the question is, why does the department of education have so much data on people and yet delivery such poor results?
Collecting data is way easier than delivering quality education.
Also that the areas that'd most benefit from funding are the ones with the least funding.
Poor results? Brother wait til its gone. But then again Republicans "love the poorly educated" (Trumps words, not mine).
Could it be because educational standards are on a state by state basis? Massachusetts educational requirement compared to FLs is a day and night difference. If anything, there should be a fed standard for each grade level instead of moms for liberty karens dictating what’s acceptable literature (when they haven’t read any of it themselves).
Because the DOE doesn't set education standards
Everyone keeps saying this but literally DoE has no control over local test scores. But sure gut it. Im sure that's why my small rural city is closing up schools cause there isn't enough funding.
Quality of teachers have gone to the crapper.
Quality of buildings too! Many toilets are overflowing.
Student test scores have gone down since the department of education was created. 50 different departments means that states will have freedom to create policies to suit their needs. States will see what is working in other states and adopt those policies.
I don't see that trend based on SAT averages. Which tests are you speaking of?
@@Nemerson74 SAT has been made simpler over time
@@Nemerson74 Just basic literacy. If you look at dollars spent per student compared against literacy and math, there's no correlation. I believe it's Baltimore SD that spends nearly the most money per student of any county in America, and most of their kids can't read at age-appropriate levels. Scary stuff.
More money doesn't mean better education. To put a finer point on it... more money can't make a kid have a good culture at home or his community. It can't make him care about education. And that's the real root of the issue.
@@Nemerson74 The real trend that is alarming is that only about 4% of colleges require the SAT or ACT. About 60% of students graduating high school do not bother with either. They have changed the SAT scoring many times since I graduated, I doubt I know what a "good" score is these days.
@@Nemerson74 If the US is anything like the UK then they've just made exams easier over time and/or just give out higher grades for the same performance.
Please please please please let this happen. The department of education has been the biggest obstacle in the way of our children succeeding.
I really appreciate this. My kids attend private schools, and I believe they have an edge over those educated in public schools. This is a great opportunity for those who can maintain their advantages.
@@PicturesofTravel lol. Republicans are nuts.
@PicturesofTravel Public schools are funded by the state you live in, not the DoE. Unless you get free or reduced lunch, or the children have special needs or disabilities. And the state you live in also sets the curriculum, not the DoE
@@PicturesofTravel Ewww - that's un American - everyone should have a chance - you are a destroyer
@josephplatt7622 All of those schools teach based on department of education guidelines. Get out of here with your nonsense.
Our kids have gotten less educated the longer the DOE has been around.
SO? Prove the connection - maybe social media? Maybe apathy? Maybe corporations?
@ it was long before social media. It was with the standardized testing. By the mid 90’s the dumbing down was well on its way.
@@Merriwether-w8kno need to prove the connection. It can be proven by the DoE's mission in the first place, which was not to improve anyone's education at all, but to make sure that predominantly black schools were getting the same funding as predominantly white schools in the same area. When that was accomplished they moved on to other "equality" metrics and never "improvement" metrics. If "white" scores were going down, they saw it as positive if black scores weren't going down as fast.
USA public education has been corrupted probably way before department of education was implemented.
So with that being said what does gutted the funds of that possibly remove that away from youths education with no real answers replace it with something that actually empowered intellectual minds in the youth in public schools help them?
Because if not I'm just seeing what he do towards that in particular as a bad than good thing. 🤦🏾♂️
Why does the government have all this personal information on us in the first place? I find that to be more offensive than shutting down the Department of Education
Spoiler alert - when you get a govt security clearance you fork over all you personal data and sign mountains of privacy waivers then the govt. data (formerly your data) gets hacked and sold. Been there done that.
Ditto
When the president doesn't do his job, it's up to congress to step up and hold him accountable, when congress doesn't do their job, the people will form a populist movement to send in a bully figure like Trump, and after everything's been shaken up, hopefully the government will reset and have a fresh start and work properly again
Bingo. ✊🏾👍🏾🇺🇲
The bully will rob everyone blind and take away everyone civil rights then he will get on a plane - you destroyed AMerica - now factor in AI - so f-ing dum - smh
It’s not education it’s indoctrination
@@fun782house Indoctrination from the state you live in. They are responsible for setting curriculum standards.
said the fox news watcher
Reading, writing. That’s it in school!
Is that why Tulsa never teaches about the race massacre? Or the forced bible readings.
Do not slow down President Trump.
What does the Department of Education actually do?
States/local pay teachers. States/local buy books and build buildings. States build and staff campuses at every level of education. Education programs at almost every university have techniques.
I can understand its existence if we knew what it did? What does it do? I know what a bunch of the other agencies do, but what about education?
Exactly everyone is being stupid about this without any clue. The majority of DoE is in grants and loans for colleges.
They only care about "unelected people doing things" when it it isn't "their" people.
no - its called the Constitution - not team sports - you are not educated
“Reason free” doesn’t inspire confidence, you know.
"Anti-Thought" might be a more accurate name
“Reason-Free Media?” You should rethink that.
Reason-free media sounds so bad. Do you guys have a marketing department ?
Reagan said he would do this. Betsy DeVos wanted to.
Incredible if Trump/McMahon could shut down the DoEd.
Afuera!!
The department of education marks the grave of education.... - Quote from 'Yes Prime Minister'
I very much want to see a President sign an executive order that goes something like this. No executive agency may impose (or seek to impose through judicial due process) a financial or criminal penalty on any entity unless both the penalty and the offense are expressly defined in an Act of Congress (with specific and narrow exceptions for federal employees). The intent being to unilaterally end the regulatory deep state and push legislative responsibilities back on Congress. After hearing his point in this video I now want Congress to pass such a law.
Thank God
Excellent ! 👍🇺🇸
No more student loans, buses, lunches - gone. If you have kids in college good luck.
@@criticalwokeracisttheory4645Yeah because none of those things existed before the DOE right? If you think that you are completely wrong. Eliminating the department will not eliminate the services it will eliminate the massive bureaucracy making that stuff far more expensive than it needs to be. Although getting rid of 90% of student loans would be a great start too since the people taking them out apparently aren’t getting any value out of them. There, now you know so you can stop embarrassing yourself.
Bye bye “No Child Left Behind”!
Famously endorsed by republicans
Yes!
Lots of complaining about the DOE but at NO POINT did any of you explain how getting rid of the department of education improves things. Sure you cut spending, but how is that a benefit to the average American?
@natmurray3391 I actually want to add on to what you said. The DoE is normally 2% of the budget (4% last year partially due to the loan forgiveness), so it wouldn't actually do much in taxes for most people. But their largest funding expenditures are on Pell Grants for college and federal student loans, whose interest rates are set by Congress.
It's pretty rich for a proponent of the DoE to complain about unelected bureaucrats.
Good shit! Also END THE FED!!!
A country that sacks the Department of Education is a country in fucking decline
@chrisrobertson9264 you sound like somebody from the Department of Education that was embezzling from the children they were basically supposed to be teaching
@chrisrobertson9264 also show me a little teeny bit of proof that the Department of Education was actually doing their f****** jobs
@ yea like Betsy DeVos did huh
IT MUST BE SO HARD TO BE A WOMAN, THIS OLD, THIS INCOMPETENT, AND HAVE YOUR BOSS CUT YOU LOOSE. “THANK YOU SO MUCH PRESIDENT TRUMP”, FOR HELPING AMERICANS DRAIN THIS TERRIBLE SWAMP. DKS, just an American.
no united states department should be unionized! taxpayer funds pay for everything, so unions go against citizens. states should be responsible and accountable for educating its children, with parents.
So much Federal money goes to local schools (with ideological strings attached) that local budgets depend upon. That should never have happened in the first place.
It doesnt mean anything until congress actually shuts it down. If not, the next president can simply start it right back up.
Whatever education system we land on...someone please use it to educate Trump on the definition of a tariff.
@@gsbarlow4 He knows awfully well what the threat of one can get done. You aren’t going to get any traction with this awesome put down you think you’ve got. I’d recommend you stop embarrassing yourself.
@@davidgill3356 Trumps comments say otherwise. He's a buffoon and the dumbest president in the history of our Country.
I agree with Robbie totally! Have Congress codify into law these cuts
Hurray
Great efforts to curb wasteful spending.
Mass teacher layoffs across the country, no more student loans, buses, lunches. I am all for cutting costs but this will affect millions across the country. There is no way Republicans win again in Congress if this gets cut.
@ You again, not a thing you said here is true, stop it. No one has lunches or buses before DOE, it’s hard to believe that you could believe that. Student loans are absolute garbage anyway but still not dependent on the DOE. I know DOE provides some funding for teachers but not nearly enough to cause mass layoffs< that is a flat out lie. Get rid of the bureaucracy.
They are supposed to have three branches as a means of stopping them from tyranny but the way they are doing it a unitary government would be less tyrannical.
All I see is more trump W's.
While he is still not a libertarian himself, Trump has done for libertarian causes than at least all the presidents I've seen in my life.
I don't get your comment right here.. so he is not a libertarian himself but his politic moves as elected government representative mostly are? doesn't that contradict itself? maybe you have bad understanding of definition ("libertarian") or his politics are not that much liberterian at all..
I forget to mention I'm big supporter of president Trump
Sounds good to me.
Agreed that Congress should act. And when they act, they should try to find something in Article 1 Section 8, authorizing Congress to control education at all…
the year is 2035, and thanks to the gutting of a department that made up less than 2% of the national budget, the United Sates of America is still running a deficit. Luckily test scores have fallen and critical thinking skills have plummeted to a new low, every child in Alabama knows the 10 commandments but not a single thing about science, math or history.
FINALLY, little Timmy will learn all about how Jesus and the dinosaurs lived together.
Why not? They are already learning there is no such thing as biological sex. You see? Every religion believes in BS.
Robby Soave is a perfect example of one of the libertarian-conservative wings of the party type who was a fence sitting / non Trump supporting guys who's totally eating crow now about Trump. We told you so Robby.
No one elected Donald Trump? Hmmm. I somehow was differently informed.
I say bue bue Superintendent Metzger you need to go 😂😂😂😂
Great idea to have education going back to local government, and lets teach back to basic subjects.
@corinne7126 They already do that. States set their own curriculum standards, not the DoE.
It is going to AI - not local communities - lol - get a clue
Here's what would most likely happen if the DoE went away. Education would fall on each individual state (as it should). I remember seeing the testing scores of all the states when i was in school. Each one had their strengths and weaknesses, but the answer was another one size fits all curriculum (common core). Whole lotta good that did. They've even gotten rid of teaching phonics and replaced it with sight words. They've taken away life skills (Home economics, wood working, auto shops, etc!) The DoE has done nothing but increase how much the taxpayer spends on each individual student, which has not yielded any positive outcomes (like, an increase in literacy or math competency).
Use the Bully Pulpit to enact permanent change to be more efficient and effective.
Amazing.
Did I sleep through the bureaucrat elections...
My communist channel I follow calls this a coup, even though we elected Trump elon, and Elon said he was going to do doge
"coup" now means "elected a guy I don't like".
we didn't elect Elon - read the Constitution - dum dum
@@Merriwether-w8k We didn't elect any of trumps cabinet either. Or the Supreme Court. Or the DoE or any other federal mess of an organization.
There's nothing precluding the president from using anyone in an advisory role. Elon isn't doing anything to the government, he's auditing on behalf of the executive branch.
2 trillion dollars went to the American oligarchs. Americans make $15 an hour.lol
This may be a bit out of place, but we should also consider what sort of "tests" are these that we give children nowadays. It is mind boggling to me that average kindergartener has 2 hours of homework daily and a child must read and write before they can go into 1st grade. People, the computers have gotten smarter, but please don't forget that humans have not biologically started developing faster. We are slowly abolishing childhood by forcing children to learn more and at much younger age than ever before. This is so harmful to children!
Would be nice to have the gov oit of our future generations minds. Its affected them in ways that ruined actual education.
Good!!!
It’s about time
I'm sorry but Reason-Free Media isn't a good name
well to be fair, you added the hyphen. lol
The sad part is that it took this long for anyone to Audit them and notice the corruption, Government needs to be held accountable for spending and abuse of power.
The government has your information. So sorry but true.
Is it just me, or are the things that Randi Weingarten said at the beginning just do not make any sense at all? They are all English words, but they do not make any sense in the order she used them.
yay yay
I guess that project 2025 might be legitimate after all........
The real question. Does Robbie lift? Slim and average or sleeper jacked? 😂
I'm subscribed on the new channel but I seem to mostly get videos from you guys on the regular Reason channel
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: AFUERA!
Diversidad y inclusión en educación? AFUERA!!!! VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO
Soyons honnêtes, "Netflix and Chill" devrait être suivi de "HBO Max and Massage My Feet"👄
LFG!
Robby’s party is nuts under Trump.
It should have never been made!!!!😅😅😅😅
Go homeschools truth
God hair
The gig is up
قالَ الربُّ يَسوعُ: «أَنَا هُوَ الكَرْمَةُ الحَقِيقِيَّةُ وأَبِي الكَرَّام.كُلُّ غُصْنٍ فِيَّ لا يَحْمِلُ ثَمَرًا يَقْطَعُهُ، وكُلُّ غُصْنٍ يَحْمِلُ ثَمَرًا يُنَقِّيهِ لِيَحْمِلَ ثَمَرًا أَكْثَر.أَنْتُمُ الآنَ أَنْقِيَاءُ بِفَضْلِ الكَلِمَةِ الَّتِي كَلَّمْتُكُم بِهَا.أُثْبُتُوا فِيَّ، وأَنَا فِيكُم. كَمَا أَنَّ الغُصْنَ لا يَقْدِرُ أَنْ يَحْمِلَ ثَمَرًا مِنْ تِلْقَاءِ ذَاتِهِ، إِنْ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ في الكَرْمَة، كَذلِكَ أَنْتُم أَيْضًا إِنْ لَمْ تَثْبُتُوا فِيَّ.أَنَا هُوَ الكَرْمَةُ وأَنْتُمُ الأَغْصَان. مَنْ يَثْبُتُ فِيَّ وأَنَا فِيه، يَحْمِلُ ثَمَرًا كَثيرًا، لأَنَّكُم بِدُونِي لا تَقْدِرُونَ أَنْ تَفْعَلُوا شَيْئًا.مَنْ لا يَثْبُتُ فِيَّ يُطْرَحُ كَالغُصْنِ خَارِجًا ويَيْبَس. وتُجْمَعُ الأَغْصَانُ اليَابِسَة، وتُطْرَحُ في النَّارِ فَتَحْتَرِق.إِنْ تَثْبُتُوا فِيَّ، وتَثْبُتْ أَقْوَالِي فِيكُم، تَطْلُبُوا مَا تَشَاؤُونَ فَيَكُونَ لَكُم.بِهذَا يُمَجَّدُ أَبِي أَنْ تَحْمِلُوا ثَمَرًا كَثيرًا، وتَصِيرُوا لي تَلاميذ.>>>>>.>.>.>.>.
If it can lawfully be done, gut the DoEd by fiat now and three years from now, we can go to the Hill and say, “Hey, have you noticed how little we miss the DoEd? Let’s make that permanent.”
Yes please do this. The government is too big and we need to shrink it in order to decrease spending.
😂 Randi go ask your pal Zelensky for some more $$
Corruption exposure incoming 👀😂
I do question why they're blaming test scores on the DoE when states set their own curriculums. The DoE funds a lot of the services for special needs, low income, and students with disabilities. I can't imagine states wanting to pick up that slack, when the funding mechanisms they use for the schools are at least partially responsible for the lack of equity in education access those groups experience.
The error is in thinking that money will solve those problems to begin with. Or even if it would solve the problem, the error is thinking that a federal bureaucracy is the most efficient distribution method.
@SeraphsWitness But if the federal bureaucracy doesn't work, what makes anybody think 50 individual state bureaucracies would do any better? That's assuming that the states would pick up that slack at all. The majority of its spending goes to federal aid programs for colleges. And there's not particularly convincing evidence that privatizing education is an effective solution
@@josephplatt7622 State control is always better than Federal control on this (and most) issues. It's smaller and more localized. Power should almost always be delegated to the smallest possible relational unit. My kids go to a charter school, which operates on taxpayer money but has control of curricular decisions. The leftists in our county hate it because they can't precisely control it... but the reality is in the outcome: Our students are miles ahead of the state average in every metric. Because it's *locally controlled*. And we spend LESS per student.
There's no "slack" to pick up. The DoE was doing nothing. Less than nothing.
No convincing evidence? Besides all the evidence? Private education consistently outperforms public education. Homeschooling even more so. How can you say there's no evidence?
A voucher system is not a bad idea, that way parents can choose where to spend their vouchers, and schools will have to compete in convincing parents that their school is best.
@@josephplatt7622 That funding was there before the DoE, it was run through the SSA. Getting rid of the DoE bureaucracy will not get rid of that funding, it should free up more of it. This is a huge lie by the drones trying to preserve their jobs and democrats that needs to be called out.
@@SeraphsWitnessI still don't agree on state control being better in most cases, they're just as capable of screwing it up for everybody, and tend to be less representative where voter turnout is low. Like local school board elections, or any election that falls out of presidential elections. It took me a while to find studies. The NHERI did warn their results on homeschooling weren't conclusive. The old one from the NAEP suggested private schools rarely performed better once you factored in student characteristics. The new ones with data from 2022 do support your argument better, but you mentioned a public charter school, which didnt look much better in reading/math than public schools. Private catholic schools seem to do better, but interestingly when filtered for economically disadvantaged students, there wasn't enough data for private schools, catholic or otherwise. And all groups take less disabled students than public schools.
I'm genuinely glad your kids are doing well where they are. I like the idea of having more flexible curriculums and having public charters boarded by locals. I just don't think demolishing DoE would help any of that.
He's actually draining the swamp!!! 🇺🇲
Also, I hope that Trump is “flooding the zone” and the people who would sue over *each* EO are too spread thin, exhausted, and impoverished to sue of *all* the EOs. Maybe they will be able to rescue some pointless programs here and there but most of the Waste State will be swept into the dustbin of history.
Yes, amen ❤
When did I sub to you?
Unsubbed.
@@suroguner I’m sure you will be missed.
Since the department was founded we went from number 1 to 26th!!!!
SOcial media - dumb parents - apathy - people like you
th-cam.com/video/ip4t8ukG74Q/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Fgue1IwpXNoi-yWw
💯
Going to be harder to get rid of DEI in education if you get rid of the department that has leverage on schools and colleges. I'd rather keep the department and use strings attached to FAFSA to pressure colleges to end DEI.
Complete lunacy. You MAGAts would kill Jesus if he came back.
Trump needs to cut the federal budget bullshtt, and then write down a list of names of the people who get all the CNN MSNBC interviews, and then cut their favorite programs as well
its like they are trying to show trump where the waste is by interviewing the people who profit the most from the waste.
but not Fox? hypocrite - ur bullshit
Here's what would most likely happen if the DoE went away. Education would fall on each individual state (as it should). I remember seeing the testing scores of all the states when i was in school. Each one had their strengths and weaknesses, but the answer was another one size fits all curriculum (common core). Whole lotta good that did. They've even gotten rid of teaching phonics and replaced it with sight words. They've taken away life skills (Home economics, wood working, auto shops, etc!) The DoE has done nothing but increase how much the taxpayer spends on each individual student, which has not yielded any positive outcomes (like, an increase in literacy or math competency).