I admire that controller who was Juggling inbound and out bound aircraft while dealing with this inflight emergency and never indicated a problem with the scenario.
I liked the fact that the controller cleaned the other aircraft off the frequency; which helped minimize the distractions and any chance of being blocked by another aircraft.
That's a great controller prioritising the emergency I remember one time I got a brake fire and aborted a take off I declared an emergency and the controller tells me to standby and starts to give surface conditions to an aircraft entering the airspace...we were shocked and just looked at each other with the Captain.... the other aircraft had to tell the controller to deal with us first and forget about the weather
@@lm1584 no it was in West Africa ...the controllers are usually really really good but this day was just out of the ordinary. Maybe he never heard but I did say "We have a right hand main gear fire requesting emergency services" I suppose the fire station had heard the radio transmission because we saw a rescue vehicle outside , even before we had properly communicated the situation with the tower. We managed to evacuate the 13pax and the rescue vehicle extinguished the fire before the firetrucks arrived. The fire had been as a result of new brakes which the engineer had told us to pump during the long back track before take off we unfortunately over did it and they went white hot and heated the hydraulic line which then caught fire
I’m a brickyard pilot. Both engines did not fail. One engine lost power. The other engine had a previously deferred bleed failure so they had to start a descent or the plane would slow leak it’s pressure. You should change the title. It’s completely incorrect. The first officer who was flying posted about it in our internal pilot Facebook page.
There is so much that we on the ground can learn from aviation and marine communications. Most Comms are sloppy and dragged on, however when you hear professionals, it makes a massive difference.
This is the exact same aircraft that David Dao Duy Anh got dragged off after refusing to leave the aircraft to accomodate deadheading crew causing all that fuss about United Airlines back in 2017.
So, you 'clickbait' much in the heading? It says "BOTH ENGINES FAIL", when only one engine failed. There is a BIG difference from a single engine failure landing and a full dead-stick landing. Had I known that your title LIED, I doubt I would've wasted the 10 minutes, waiting for the second engine failure that NEVER HAPPENED.
I love your channel. Thanks for posting these. As a major airline Captain for 30 years, I’ve learned a lot from these videos. I really appreciate your passion.
Adam Dobkin I go into a simulator every six months and train for various types of emergencies. To watch scenarios in real life, with ATC, other aircraft on frequency, Fire Rescue, and numerous other encounters that you can’t simulate is beyond valuable. To think about how I would have reacted in a similar situation. In the Simulator, it is me, the First Officer and an Instructor/examiner. There are none of the other factors I listed above. This videos can be an important learning tool for all categories of pilots, Air Traffic Controllers, etc. I hope that answers your question.
@@darkjudge8786 She was clear and concise. She refused? When? Point to the parts where she was asked to repeat and didn't. The ATC controller was heavily accented and sloppy.
@@johnnukecop - I couldn't agree more. Clear down to the point and comms switching between CPT and F/O can easily be explained by them doing their tasks/checklists/setting up FMS for the runway etc. Good example of straightforward comms and a crew knowing what it is doing. I liked how the CPT asked for vectors away so he could lose altitutde rather than doing a get-there-itis descent for the runway only to figure he's too high and then having to fly a single engine g/a.
At my last ATC facility we had a designated single frequency for inbound emergencies. No need to “clean up” frequency, emergency aircraft doesn’t have to change frequency and all concerned sectors plus CFR command can hear updated information.
@@pinkycatcher that will be a bigger challenge. To tell everyone to move on to a standby frequency . Everyone will keep on tuning into that frequency unaware of the emergency at some point. Plus maybe they didn't have a standby frequency
@@derrick_blak_ No what I mean is move the emergency aircraft off the common frequency to a new one. I'm surprised there's not a standard always on emergency only frequency
To all of our air traffic controllers, y'all are the tip of the sword. Every emergency I've experienced as a pilot, without y'all could result in so many tragedies. Thank you to ATC for all the good work yall do. ATC is so good in this country.
Nice to see that! I’m sure ATC appreciates you. They never get applause after a great landing or people saying hi like many Pilots do. From maintenance and ground crew and em opps to ATC and Pilots we all appreciate the work you do to get us where we are going smoothly as possible and safely, so thanks to all!
The comms during this event was just incredible. Hearing the tower work to clear the airspace and radio channels so effectively was just damn impressive!!!
Man you videos are awesome, the first time I flew(10-15 times per year) at first I was a little un easy thinking about all the emergencies but then it actual gave me comfort to think how professional the pilots and arc always are and how little these incidents turn into larger accidents
Talk about professional! I am continually amazed at how air traffic controllers devote themselves to helping in any way they can. It’s inspiring to listen to the cockpit and tower interact with such calm efficiency
That was effective in so far as it worked, but it's not what the rest of the world would call "professional". Listen to the Thompson Airways bird strike video if you want to hear genuine professionals at work.
@@atubebuff 175 can’t dump fuel. Max takeoff is 38k and max landing is 34k. So it’s pretty unlikely you’d ever be in an overweight landing scenario. Assuming you departed as max takeoff weight, the fuel burned on taxi and takeoff would’ve brought you down below 34k by the time you got turned around and back on the ground. The only aircraft with dump valves are ones that carry significantly more fuel than they can land with; that would take hours to burn off.
@@vanlifeonthego6684 Whenever I heard the county mentioned on the news it was always pronounced like "Mow-rie" or "Maw-rie" so that's what I grew up thinking how it was said.
Caryl, here. We have done a lot of flying for vacations, usually Orange County, Calif., Or LAX...both to NYC. When my mother passed away in 1999, being an only child, I had to fly from O.C./ or LAX to Atlanta or DFW to Meridian, Miss. to care for my father. In 4 years, I got enough Delta FF miles for a trip to Europe. This being said, I have always wanted to tell air traffic controllers how much I appreciate what they do and how safe I feel knowing that they are down there looking out for us. You have to have nerves of steel, an inner peace, and a load of confidence to do that job. Thank you all so very much. Peace.
I love watching your videos. I saw one not too long ago with an E-190 and HAD to call my husband. His company had done some work on that very plane fairly recent to the incident. It turned out that it was nothing to do with the work done on it, but it always gets me a little nervous. He always knows that he does his job well, but there is always going to be that nagging little voice if something happens. He works with a guy who was an inspector on the Space Shuttle Challenger. The guy just about had a heart attack when it exploded.
Thank you for what you are doing. These videos are very interesting and educational. Also huge respect to the professionals whose voices we've heard here!
It may not have played a factor, but it's interesting they chose BNA over a couple other early choices. Embraer has a large maintenance facility with 2 huge hangars, so it certainly was convenient for them. It's known at EAMS and they do C Checks for RP, AC and others.
I thought I heard at the beginning the pilot said one engine at minimum power. ...Probably during the course of running through the checklist for an engine at minimum power, maybe the pilots were able to get it back up running on full power again...
Good controller and very good pilots doing their altitude for airspeed management. Would like to hear why there's dual engine issues... that's usually fuel or birds.
Aye. A dual engine failure is extremely rare. I’m not sure what threshold the NTSB has for opening an investigation. I’m sure they have some discretion, and this certainly seems as close to a major crash without crashing as one could come. Either way, their insight would be interesting.
And the scariest part: Both of these pilots were probably in their mid 20s and make probably half, if not less, of what most of you here do. I could only imagine the stress they felt , but they did a great job and ultimately a card in their career hat.
@@liberty2144 It's the most morbid part of dealing with an emergency aircraft. The reason they need to know souls on board and fuel remaining is in case they crash; it's not a question asked that'll help keep them in the air.
Number 2 was on minimal power, and could have been lost also. Combined with the fact their first approach to land was high and they had to set up again, that could have been bad. However, they regained full power to the engine and landed immediately as a normal emergency precaution.
The transcribing of the audio is off a bit. 0:53 sounds like “For now, we’re going to continue to Nashville, we’ve still got a checklist to run” 1:27 “Roger, altitude your discretion ABOVE 6000 ft” 5:10 “an hour, 45 min(1:45) of fuel and 69 souls onboard” 6:44 “brickyard 3507, are you still WITHOUT engine(s)?”
If they had one engine while landing, they could have taxied to the gate and not inconvenienced the passengers and the landing planes behind them. No need to make emergency services go out to the runway.
Avherald title: Republic E170 near Nashville on Oct 24th 2019, both engines temporarily lost power, single engine landing. Other sources agree with this and actually you can hear it on this video.
@@VASAviation I communicated directly with the FO on this flight via social media. Her commentary is that they never lost power on engine #2. They dispatched with bleed #2 deferred and therefore couldn't maintain cabin altitude after the loss of engine #1. They conducted a thrust-idle emergency descent to an altitude safe for an depressurized cabin and that might be what created the confusion about temporarily losing power on engine #2.
Would have been a better move to overfly the airport and enter left traffic instead of widening out… if you are sweating being all engine out… keep max height and circle around the field to lose height, just in case…
I don’t think they actually lost both engines. I heard they lost one engine and the remaining operative one happened to have an inoperative bleed system - which lead them to do an emergency descent. I’m guessing ATC misunderstood it initially for a dual engine failure.
Depends on the altitude, if an engine fails during takeoff the other still does have power to climb to a safe altitude and bring them back down... you can't maintain cruise altitude though
I moved away 3 years ago after my whole life in TN. Listen to these anyway, but sure as heck smied through this one. Plus, it was almost Southern Hospiltlity.
Always amazes me how the crew and the ATC maintain such a tremendous level of calmness and professionalism in such a difficult situation. Kudos to all!
Great controller. Stupid fake aircraft at the end. Don't show anything if you don't have the aircraft. Makes it look like a kids game and unprofessional.
Like a commentator below I am always surprised in these situations that there isnt a dedicated frequency - often time seems to be taken up clearing others off the airways and in other videos there has been lots of garbled interrruptions etc until finally the clearing happens - is there a reason a dedicated channel isnt made available which would seem to make sense, but Im always aware there might be considerations that are not obvious?
@@andytaylor1588 controllers don't really care how much fuel in weight you have, they want to know how much time you have to work a problem before you need to land
I used to fly for that airline, they drill in engine failures into you so much that, when you have problems with one, its typically a non-event. Of course, I've never had one actually fail on me, but I've had a few issues. And there are far worse cities to be stuck in than Nashville.
I always see lots of errors in the captions. For instance, @ 0:53, you say "We're set up for that" but she says "We still have a checklist to run" clearly.
![[REAL ATC] American B757 has COMPLETE RADIO FAILURE out of Kennedy!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Wcq6KipBOro/mqdefault.jpg)
![[REAL ATC] American B757 has COMPLETE RADIO FAILURE out of Kennedy!](/img/tr.png)
That controller, voice and professionalism, is exactly what I would want in an emergency. Amazing job
Approach is an absolute machine
yes
even with an accent that was one of the clearest sounding controllers I've heard
I admire that controller who was Juggling inbound and out bound aircraft while dealing with this inflight emergency and never indicated a problem with the scenario.
One of the best controllers I talk to him all the times when I fly into BNA he's great. one of the best they have there.
The is amazing, but he DID try to touch me one day…smh🙄
@@Chihuahuauno1 What???
Every so often, there's an ATC that just has me cheering out loud, Great Job! He's one of them.
I liked the fact that the controller cleaned the other aircraft off the frequency; which helped minimize the distractions and any chance of being blocked by another aircraft.
love the concise coms by all the other pilots
i winced when one of the other pilots said "In the box"
Comm Brevity
@@samuelwhaley6658 SAME! And don’t forget the Ident that the controller didn’t ask for.
That's a great controller prioritising the emergency I remember one time I got a brake fire and aborted a take off I declared an emergency and the controller tells me to standby and starts to give surface conditions to an aircraft entering the airspace...we were shocked and just looked at each other with the Captain.... the other aircraft had to tell the controller to deal with us first and forget about the weather
holy cow - where was this? major airport?
YIKES!!!
@@lm1584 no it was in West Africa ...the controllers are usually really really good but this day was just out of the ordinary. Maybe he never heard but I did say "We have a right hand main gear fire requesting emergency services" I suppose the fire station had heard the radio transmission because we saw a rescue vehicle outside , even before we had properly communicated the situation with the tower. We managed to evacuate the 13pax and the rescue vehicle extinguished the fire before the firetrucks arrived. The fire had been as a result of new brakes which the engineer had told us to pump during the long back track before take off we unfortunately over did it and they went white hot and heated the hydraulic line which then caught fire
That is absolutely against our training! I am so sorry that happened!
@@taffyhomwe463 Maybe he was a newbie.
I’m a brickyard pilot. Both engines did not fail. One engine lost power. The other engine had a previously deferred bleed failure so they had to start a descent or the plane would slow leak it’s pressure. You should change the title. It’s completely incorrect. The first officer who was flying posted about it in our internal pilot Facebook page.
You have an internal Facebook page?
thefactorypilot145 yes, most companies do. In fact, we have several.
Fire Capra
Well they said "running on minimal power" to ATC
They reported to ATC that one engine was minimal, and later reported full power to one engine.
There is so much that we on the ground can learn from aviation and marine communications. Most Comms are sloppy and dragged on, however when you hear professionals, it makes a massive difference.
Delta wasn’t happy about that 190 speed lol
Saved them some fuel though ;-)
This is the exact same aircraft that David Dao Duy Anh got dragged off after refusing to leave the aircraft to accomodate deadheading crew causing all that fuss about United Airlines back in 2017.
Good catch.
And. So what
engalvan He put a curse on it.
@@brianwilkins5673 Or he used some of that pile of settlement money to hire someone to put a curse on it. ;)
So, you 'clickbait' much in the heading? It says "BOTH ENGINES FAIL", when only one engine failed. There is a BIG difference from a single engine failure landing and a full dead-stick landing. Had I known that your title LIED, I doubt I would've wasted the 10 minutes, waiting for the second engine failure that NEVER HAPPENED.
I didn't hear that both engines "FAILED". One had full power prior to landing.
Engine 2 was at minimum power when they initially declared, engine 1 was dead and couldn't be relit.
How lucky that plane was to land there, where EMB has a maintenance facility there.
1:26 is "altitude at your discretion above 6000 feet". Which makes more sense in the situation.
Correct
Maury County* Nashville resident here.
Wish to know why both engines had problems at the same time
Did this turn out to be contaminated fuel? Bird strikes?
but they had one good engine so not so bad as the plane in the Hudson
"I've got teterboro for you"
Sully says no .......
"We're taking the Hudson"
Unable
Teterboro: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?
@@RedJive-jx8hh Yes.
I don't know how flight controllers do this all day. If I tried somebody would end up with a purple bear in their pool.
Pink bear... one eye
At the busy airports the only do 20 minutes and then have a break.
Plus they get a 6mth holiday twice a year and heaps of overtime.
Love the reference hahaha
@@CarlHislop Fine. My TV isn't the ultimate.
Awesome Controller
I love your channel. Thanks for posting these. As a major airline Captain for 30 years, I’ve learned a lot from these videos. I really appreciate your passion.
Joseph Dale wow. Amazing that you’d learn from this I thought it would be just us keyboard pilots that like this stuff 👍
Wow, your comment makes me so happy! :)
What have you learned that you didnt learn as a major airline capt? Genuinely curious!! Best.
Adam Dobkin I go into a simulator every six months and train for various types of emergencies. To watch scenarios in real life, with ATC, other aircraft on frequency, Fire Rescue, and numerous other encounters that you can’t simulate is beyond valuable. To think about how I would have reacted in a similar situation. In the Simulator, it is me, the First Officer and an Instructor/examiner. There are none of the other factors I listed above. This videos can be an important learning tool for all categories of pilots, Air Traffic Controllers, etc.
I hope that answers your question.
@@josephdale69 Nothing beats real! 👍
Perfect attitude from the tower and the pilots. Calm and professional is the way to go.
Bullshit. The female pilot mumbled and was barely coherent. She was a danger to life because she refused to communicate properly.
Dark Judge - Can I rent you for my next party?
@@darkjudge8786 She was clear and concise. She refused? When? Point to the parts where she was asked to repeat and didn't. The ATC controller was heavily accented and sloppy.
Did you guys listen to the same audio? All the controllers and both pilots on the emergency aircraft were audible and clear.
@@johnnukecop - I couldn't agree more. Clear down to the point and comms switching between CPT and F/O can easily be explained by them doing their tasks/checklists/setting up FMS for the runway etc. Good example of straightforward comms and a crew knowing what it is doing. I liked how the CPT asked for vectors away so he could lose altitutde rather than doing a get-there-itis descent for the runway only to figure he's too high and then having to fly a single engine g/a.
That’s my buddy I used to work with at Memphis Center on BNA approach. Great controller!
What happened to rufus down in kmem?
@@kellyhanlon5222 Not sure who that is. I worked at Memphis Center.
@@bart99gt he was a mem ground guy
really good controller
He’s CLEARLY experienced and GREAT at what he does❣️
Crew scheduling tried to make them fly 3 more legs after this. I'm not kidding.
For real? Wow... sure union wasn't happy about that.
Oh my! We’re you on the flight?
@@alex321neo I was not, but my coworker knows the first officer well
@@ryanryessir LOL They weren't
@Ministry of Vengeance I would be looking for the nearest bar after that
I love how cities have their own interesting nav points, "direct to REABA." Perfect for this airspace.
I remember hearing a nav point called "BRBQ" and "RIBS". I couldn't stop laughing
The waypoints on some arrivals line up to say something.
Awesome Controller
We've got the PIGLT SIX, GOOFY SEVEN, BUGGZ FOUR, CWRLD FOUR, and other themed STARs in Orlando.
Detroit's fixes are named after Barry Sanders and several Red Wings last I looked. Fun stuff!
Clear concise communications all around. "Nice job" to all involved. ( From a Canadian ATP pilot's ears, and over 40 years and still in the business )
I was there in BNA when that EMB 175 was inbound, heard the whole thing live. Scary day for those pilots. Great job ✈️👍🏻
That moment they ask for fuel and souls on board. Puts a shiver down your spine.
At my last ATC facility we had a designated single frequency for inbound emergencies. No need to “clean up” frequency, emergency aircraft doesn’t have to change frequency and all concerned sectors plus CFR command can hear updated information.
"Brickyard 3507 , we're working on cleaning up the frequency for you "
Why don't they just move the emergency aircraft to another frequency rather than use the one that everyone knows to turn to?
@@pinkycatcher that will be a bigger challenge. To tell everyone to move on to a standby frequency . Everyone will keep on tuning into that frequency unaware of the emergency at some point. Plus maybe they didn't have a standby frequency
@@derrick_blak_ No what I mean is move the emergency aircraft off the common frequency to a new one.
I'm surprised there's not a standard always on emergency only frequency
@@pinkycatcher there's a standard emergency frequency 121.5 Mhz.
To all of our air traffic controllers, y'all are the tip of the sword. Every emergency I've experienced as a pilot, without y'all could result in so many tragedies. Thank you to ATC for all the good work yall do. ATC is so good in this country.
Nice to see that! I’m sure ATC appreciates you. They never get applause after a great landing or people saying hi like many Pilots do. From maintenance and ground crew and em opps to ATC and Pilots we all appreciate the work you do to get us where we are going smoothly as possible and safely, so thanks to all!
3 "y'alls". Puke.
@@lbowsk Listen, if English had a good second person plural, regional versions like y'all and youse guys wouldn't be necessary.
Controller is top shelf. Excellent work.
The comms during this event was just incredible. Hearing the tower work to clear the airspace and radio channels so effectively was just damn impressive!!!
I like this controller, he moves with a sense of urgency.
Man you videos are awesome, the first time I flew(10-15 times per year) at first I was a little un easy thinking about all the emergencies but then it actual gave me comfort to think how professional the pilots and arc always are and how little these incidents turn into larger accidents
Awesome!
Talk about professional! I am continually amazed at how air traffic controllers devote themselves to helping in any way they can. It’s inspiring to listen to the cockpit and tower interact with such calm efficiency
That was effective in so far as it worked, but it's not what the rest of the world would call "professional". Listen to the Thompson Airways bird strike video if you want to hear genuine professionals at work.
@@iatsd "piss off, ya wanker"
@@iatsd How exactly was he unprofessional?
@@vernonsmithee792 can't reply to the content, eh? poor wee thing. one day you'll learn.
@@morganghetti compare and contrast to the Thompson Air video.
0:52 “we still got a checklist to run” in stead of “we’re set up for that”
Thank you!
Yeah there are lots of incorrect captions unfortunately, but its hard to hear so I cant be too hard on them
_We've still got a checklist to run._
I work at BNA and I remember when this happened. Incredible to hear this side of it.
Can I get ILS 32 into Smyrna please?
Plane never lost power in both engines. They did lose 1 engine. The working engine had a pack deferred so they where losing pressurization
He didn't need to dump fuel or did he just come in "hot"?
Mac Delaney 175 can’t dump fuel.
@@atubebuff 175 can’t dump fuel. Max takeoff is 38k and max landing is 34k. So it’s pretty unlikely you’d ever be in an overweight landing scenario. Assuming you departed as max takeoff weight, the fuel burned on taxi and takeoff would’ve brought you down below 34k by the time you got turned around and back on the ground. The only aircraft with dump valves are ones that carry significantly more fuel than they can land with; that would take hours to burn off.
Nice to see that some ATCons can be both fast and clear instead of gabbling like auctioneers.
P.S. it's Maury County. Signed: A former Middle Tennesseean. ;)
Yes but people around TN pronounce it as if it was spelled "Murray". Has seemed weird to me for 37 years here.
@@vanlifeonthego6684 Whenever I heard the county mentioned on the news it was always pronounced like "Mow-rie" or "Maw-rie" so that's what I grew up thinking how it was said.
Caryl, here. We have done a lot of flying for vacations, usually Orange County, Calif., Or LAX...both to NYC. When my mother passed away in 1999, being an only child, I had to fly from O.C./ or LAX to Atlanta or DFW to Meridian, Miss. to care for my father. In 4 years, I got enough Delta FF miles for a trip to Europe. This being said, I have always wanted to tell air traffic controllers how much I appreciate what they do and how safe I feel knowing that they are down there looking out for us. You have to have nerves of steel, an inner peace, and a load of confidence to do that job. Thank you all so very much. Peace.
Fantastic controller. Totally on top of the job.
Nobody:
Southwest: "Any chance we can get a shortcut?"
Lol, where?
Well trained pilots and controllers! Great job.
These experts are so calm and professional!!
This one had a little bit of everything, didn't it?
I'll be going on an Embraer in the USA soon
Nice
@@VASAviation I was a classroom instructor at Republic for 5 years. The ERJ fleet is awesome. They are great aircraft.
Yeah Embraer 170/190 is solid aircraft.
You and a few million other people
And you try to say in person what you say behind your back ...
Pilot’s vocal fry is annoying. Sadly this is how most young women talk nowadays. Barf.
Amazingly fluent communications. So quick and calm.
I have trouble getting everyone and things into the car to proceed.
Apparently "no pressure"......
I love watching your videos. I saw one not too long ago with an E-190 and HAD to call my husband. His company had done some work on that very plane fairly recent to the incident. It turned out that it was nothing to do with the work done on it, but it always gets me a little nervous. He always knows that he does his job well, but there is always going to be that nagging little voice if something happens. He works with a guy who was an inspector on the Space Shuttle Challenger. The guy just about had a heart attack when it exploded.
Thank you for what you are doing. These videos are very interesting and educational. Also huge respect to the professionals whose voices we've heard here!
I appreciate that!
It may not have played a factor, but it's interesting they chose BNA over a couple other early choices. Embraer has a large maintenance facility with 2 huge hangars, so it certainly was convenient for them. It's known at EAMS and they do C Checks for RP, AC and others.
Sounds like he had power to the engine the whole time. Or at least atc sounded like they didn't know it was working
I thought I heard at the beginning the pilot said one engine at minimum power.
...Probably during the course of running through the checklist for an engine at minimum power, maybe the pilots were able to get it back up running on full power again...
Good controller and very good pilots doing their altitude for airspeed management.
Would like to hear why there's dual engine issues... that's usually fuel or birds.
Aye. A dual engine failure is extremely rare. I’m not sure what threshold the NTSB has for opening an investigation. I’m sure they have some discretion, and this certainly seems as close to a major crash without crashing as one could come. Either way, their insight would be interesting.
@@MrWATCHthisWAY I think you're confusing two different flights, ValuJet 592 and Eastern Air Lines 855.
They didn’t actually have a dual engine failure, the right engine had an inop bleed, that was already differed.
Look up incidents with DEF
Engine ice can also cause dual failure or dual power loss too if the crew forgets to turn it on (for aircraft without auto). Not the case here.
And the scariest part: Both of these pilots were probably in their mid 20s and make probably half, if not less, of what most of you here do. I could only imagine the stress they felt , but they did a great job and ultimately a card in their career hat.
luckily now, a few years later, they make more than almost anyone
Does anyone else get sick to their stomach when they say how many SOULS ON BOARD ...IS IT THAT JUST ME?
Faith T why would that be an issue?
@@liberty2144 It's the most morbid part of dealing with an emergency aircraft. The reason they need to know souls on board and fuel remaining is in case they crash; it's not a question asked that'll help keep them in the air.
lies damnlies True, but it can also be helpful to know that all people are off the plane in case of an evacuation
Why do they souls instead of people?
@@gerrikoehler It goes back to naval tradition.
69 souls onboard
Me: Nice
TheRedGamerFPV giggity
I like the way she uses her super cool airline voice.🤣🤣
I don't mean to be rude, but am I missing something here? What is the big deal? They lost Number 1; Number 2 was okay.
When the emergency started they also had problems with Engine #2 as well
Number 2 was on minimal power, and could have been lost also. Combined with the fact their first approach to land was high and they had to set up again, that could have been bad. However, they regained full power to the engine and landed immediately as a normal emergency precaution.
The other engine pac was inop, so it was a cabin pressurization issue. But still a combined mechanical emergency that was very serious in nature.
Excelente canal! saludos desde el segundo país con menos tráfico aéreo, Venezuela.
Un abrazo hermanos!
Did I miss something (both engines FAILED?) The pilot stated that one engined failed.
the right engine was running at minimal power
The transcribing of the audio is off a bit. 0:53 sounds like “For now, we’re going to continue to Nashville, we’ve still got a checklist to run”
1:27 “Roger, altitude your discretion ABOVE 6000 ft”
5:10 “an hour, 45 min(1:45) of fuel and 69 souls onboard”
6:44 “brickyard 3507, are you still WITHOUT engine(s)?”
69 souls, nice
That’s my daughter talking ❤️
how on earth do the controllers keep everything clear and safe, there are planes everywhere. these folks are amazing.
If they had one engine while landing, they could have taxied to the gate and not inconvenienced the passengers and the landing planes behind them. No need to make emergency services go out to the runway.
Thank you for showing you know absolutely nothing about aviation.
You just lost a viewer.
Oh, a viewer. I won't sleep today. I'm sad.
Don’t understand why ppl have to talk so fast, barely make out what there saying
Also APT CMD: _"awww man, I was on my lunch break"_
Nice thing about landing an Embraer at Nashville is that Embraer has a regional airline support facility there.
Based on avherald they never had a dual engine failure. They dispatched single bleed.
Avherald title: Republic E170 near Nashville on Oct 24th 2019, both engines temporarily lost power, single engine landing.
Other sources agree with this and actually you can hear it on this video.
@@VASAviation I plumb missed it. What is the time stamp for it? Thanks.
@@VASAviation I communicated directly with the FO on this flight via social media. Her commentary is that they never lost power on engine #2. They dispatched with bleed #2 deferred and therefore couldn't maintain cabin altitude after the loss of engine #1. They conducted a thrust-idle emergency descent to an altitude safe for an depressurized cabin and that might be what created the confusion about temporarily losing power on engine #2.
This is cool bc I live in Nashville I know no one cares but whatever
I care.😊 I grew up in a small town south of Nashville.
Would have been a better move to overfly the airport and enter left traffic instead of widening out… if you are sweating being all engine out… keep max height and circle around the field to lose height, just in case…
You can't maintain altitude with only one engine at minimal power, so they must've gotten #2 working again before they were down to 8000'.
Exactly
I don’t think they actually lost both engines. I heard they lost one engine and the remaining operative one happened to have an inoperative bleed system - which lead them to do an emergency descent. I’m guessing ATC misunderstood it initially for a dual engine failure.
@@cris8459 this is correct
Depends on the altitude, if an engine fails during takeoff the other still does have power to climb to a safe altitude and bring them back down... you can't maintain cruise altitude though
Excellent controller. Love that Tennessee accent.
I moved away 3 years ago after my whole life in TN. Listen to these anyway, but sure as heck smied through this one. Plus, it was almost Southern Hospiltlity.
Grew up south of Nashville, and recognized that Middle TN accent right away.
It was lovely....
Did I miss something? I only heard 1 engine out.
"1 lost engine and the other with minimum power."
Always amazes me how the crew and the ATC maintain such a tremendous level of calmness and professionalism in such a difficult situation. Kudos to all!
It does no good to FREAK OUT, FEAR IS contagious, but guess what, SO IS calm !! ! !!
Great controller. Stupid fake aircraft at the end. Don't show anything if you don't have the aircraft. Makes it look like a kids game and unprofessional.
0:54 "We've still got a checklist to run."
5:13 "45 minutes of fuel..."
4,500 lbs of fuel....way more than 45 min. I flew this same tail # numerous times at Republic. Good work by crew and ATC!
Ross Kanzinger he was correcting an incorrect caption. Pilot said 45 mins of fuel, not 4500lb.
TheSwanny ahh ok
Sounds like “hour forty five minutes of fuel”
Like a commentator below I am always surprised in these situations that there isnt a dedicated frequency - often time seems to be taken up clearing others off the airways and in other videos there has been lots of garbled interrruptions etc until finally the clearing happens - is there a reason a dedicated channel isnt made available which would seem to make sense, but Im always aware there might be considerations that are not obvious?
Why does the description to the video call this a double engine failure when the pilot clearly states it was a single engine failure?
Great controller, pilot though is like meh dropped an engine, whatever sounds like he's been hitting a bong
John 14:6
Jesus saith I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man cometh unto the Father except by me.
As soon as i see *DUAL ENGINE FAILURE*
In the back of my head: "Cactus 1549..."
"We're gonna be in the Hudson"
I fly GA out of BNA/JWN, and BNA ATC is awesome.
Consistently missing quotes on your transcript. Over and over and over, ever single video
Please change the title as it is incorrect. Otherwise, pretty good job!
At 5:10 I heard "45 minutes of fuel", not the 4,500 of fuel on the transcript.
And if both engines failed...the amount of fuel left really doesn't matter....... Gravity is the problem.
I heard "45 hundred of fuel", like in the transcript.
"hour and 45 minutes of fuel"
@@Tker1970 the weight of the fuel plays a part.
@@andytaylor1588 controllers don't really care how much fuel in weight you have, they want to know how much time you have to work a problem before you need to land
Sounded to me like they had 1 engine.
They did
@@VASAviation Title says both :)
@@MoogieSRO The transmissions said they had throttle control problems earlier with the remaining engine (sticking?).
Other engine had "minimal power"...
The lady pilot was so calm she seemed bored. Probably just pissed that she's gonna be stuck overnight in Nashville LOL
I used to fly for that airline, they drill in engine failures into you so much that, when you have problems with one, its typically a non-event. Of course, I've never had one actually fail on me, but I've had a few issues. And there are far worse cities to be stuck in than Nashville.
"Both engines failed"????! BS. CLICKBAIT.
6:55 Engine 1 failed, Engine 2 was minimal power but able to maintain altitude.
What an incredibly professional job by all involved.
Brickyard3507 we are falling like a brick.
What was the cause of the problem? I can't find any reports
Why does the title say both engines failed when the audio shows that did not happen???
Yeah I won't be flying on an airline called " brickyard. "
Note to self: If you ever own a plane, call it something other than *Brickyard.*
Maybe Virgin then?
Callsign for Republic, but livery for Continental/United on the plane? Sloppy! But great video otherwise!
It was a United codeshare flight, hence the livery, but it was operated by RP and they use Brickyard so all that was accurate
I always see lots of errors in the captions. For instance, @ 0:53, you say "We're set up for that" but she says "We still have a checklist to run" clearly.
Good for them that they got power back to engine no. 2