SO much sense. Only when the boy was asked about his reasons for truanting was the reason understood rather than a 'system led' approached that decided for him what the problem was rather than listen to what he said the problem was. Listen to young people and their reasons rather than have 'experts' decide the reasons on their behalf.
Really clear and thought provoking presentation. It would have been nice had we had slightly more time to read the slides, but I learned a lot here, thank you.
context would also look at professional negligence and hold professionals by the same standards that parents are held too therefore - thinking about when professionals don't dignose autism or other childhood oprganic disorders and chose instead to parent blame in a very misguided way
when does a strategy discussion take place after child protection services have been contacted? And if the 15 days have passed. Is it safe to say there is no need for a child protection conference? Would they work with me to resolve and problems?
A very good presentation. However, all systems aimed at safeguarding have a high level of self denial. By that I mean the idea that we can manage the environment outside of the home in a way as to safeguard or raise the safety of children to a satisfactory level is an enormous task that will require a high level of surveillance, financial intervention and political will to change some of the risk factors presented to young people. And example of this is drugs. To prevent the drugs or guns from entering into certain communities is something that lays at the feet of politicians and security forces. This realisation is not new and has been known for many years, therefore the term Contextual safeguarding may be just another trend another soundbite without the energy and will to change how our communities function. Children that need safeguarding general don't come from affluent areas, why is that.
abuse knows no boundaries, children from affluent areas can also be in need of of safeguarding and it is a stereotype that people think that more children from less affluent areas are in need of more safeguarding. It may be that the later is more publicised because no one would like to think a doctor or solicitor could abuse their children but of course, non one bats an eyelid if they learn some kids on a council estate are the subject of child protection. It disturbs the society to think that educated people can be abusers. This is a sad fact of our society, we do not see beyond what the eyes want to see.
SO much sense. Only when the boy was asked about his reasons for truanting was the reason understood rather than a 'system led' approached that decided for him what the problem was rather than listen to what he said the problem was. Listen to young people and their reasons rather than have 'experts' decide the reasons on their behalf.
Thank yo social media and youtube for this new wave of learning and amazing talk during the pandemic. Thank you!
Excellent and so true.
Really clear and thought provoking presentation. It would have been nice had we had slightly more time to read the slides, but I learned a lot here, thank you.
Great presentation. The audio was recorded low and struggled to hear it clearly. However, exceptionally insightful information.
Fantastic and focused presentation
Thank you!!!
context would also look at professional negligence and hold professionals by the same standards that parents are held too therefore - thinking about when professionals don't dignose autism or other childhood oprganic disorders and chose instead to parent blame in a very misguided way
great talk
Fantastic video. Really enjoyed this, would love to get in touch with the speaker if anyone can signpost? .... a DSL.
What is DSL?
@@arandomgamer5722 designated safe guarding lead
Great video🎉
when does a strategy discussion take place after child protection services have been contacted? And if the 15 days have passed. Is it safe to say there is no need for a child protection conference?
Would they work with me to resolve and problems?
The audio level is too low on this video
A very good presentation. However, all systems aimed at safeguarding have a high level of self denial. By that I mean the idea that we can manage the environment outside of the home in a way as to safeguard or raise the safety of children to a satisfactory level is an enormous task that will require a high level of surveillance, financial intervention and political will to change some of the risk factors presented to young people. And example of this is drugs. To prevent the drugs or guns from entering into certain communities is something that lays at the feet of politicians and security forces. This realisation is not new and has been known for many years, therefore the term Contextual safeguarding may be just another trend another soundbite without the energy and will to change how our communities function. Children that need safeguarding general don't come from affluent areas, why is that.
abuse knows no boundaries, children from affluent areas can also be in need of of safeguarding and it is a stereotype that people think that more children from less affluent areas are in need of more safeguarding. It may be that the later is more publicised because no one would like to think a doctor or solicitor could abuse their children but of course, non one bats an eyelid if they learn some kids on a council estate are the subject of child protection. It disturbs the society to think that educated people can be abusers. This is a sad fact of our society, we do not see beyond what the eyes want to see.
Very informative