There's nothing in the front of a Nano to absorb the impact energy. That's one of the reasons it's so inexpensive. Yes, it's meant to be the replacement for a 2-wheeler, in that respect it is better. But at the same time, this car is comparable to a 1950s or '60s European car in its safety performance, and many decades later, we've learned a great deal on how to not have cars get squished into small lumps of metal in collisions.
It could use a little better front end design, maybe not so vertical and creases in the hood to help some. But it is sorta to be expected from a $3k car lol
I will be honest i hate this car. But am happy to say it's safer then a bike with a fmily of 4 in like they do in inida. I do hope tata makes at at least 2 star.
You can roll away on I motorcycle or lay the bike down to save your hide in this your knees are the crumple zone so road rash or dead? Think I'll take the road rash
+Matthew Caughey In a bike the driver might well roll away in a shunt but the passengerS (usually wife & kids in India) will NOT. Over there this mousetrap of a car is better than any bike, at least the passengers have a chance to survive. Alas it was too expensive to buy anyway for the poor people at whom it was aimed, and the richer rejected it completely.
Yes. The quality is shoddy. But they delivered a working product. It's much better than 4 people hitching on motorcycle. And unlike China, there wasn't any copyright infringement. Only frugal engineering and manufacturing innovation. If I'm not mistaken, Nano was to Tata what Beetle was to VW.
it's so funny that people are criticizing something which they have no idea about the idea behind of it. tata nano is not car promising what you expect from the result of this test. nobody including the producer acclaims that. their only concern was to create something small for the traffic. cheap and at least more secure than motorcycle for the families. it's just a car created for the low class families as a more secure alternative than driving a motorcycle with 4-5 people including small kids. it is an alternative for those families which have limited budget to buy a car. its design concerns the very crowded and slow traffic of the big cities of India. nobody can drive the car in this speed level already (in busy cities of India). the basic concern is how can make the traffic safer for these people who are using bikes with many people and they come up with this very affordable car that almost has the same price with motorcycle.
+Theodor Butters Maintance cost will scratch their assets anyway, so better to have a new low cost maintenance car than second hand garbage, which will always end up in a garage every week.
+Vaibhav Vashisht (Vabby) You can pick up a 3-5 year old car for significanttly less money then a new one and still have a better car then a new one at the same price. The Nano was meant to be something cheap that Indians can afford, as the second-hand market isn't that big in poor countries with low car ownership rates. Same here in Romania. People can't afford expensive new cars (over 15k euros), so alot of people either buy second-hand cars from other countries or get cheap new cars made here. Problem is the those cheap romanian cars break up really often and you'll usually see services full of cheap domestic-made cars with every problem you can possibly imagine...
Theodor Butters Well, the point behind it was for the lower middle class people to afford a car in the rate of bike, it costs only 2000us dollars maximum. Even a normal quality second hand hatchback costs 7000us dollars. So you can understand. Anyway, we Indians doesn't buy it. Lol.
Marie Cue dude it is designed for low class not meddle class here in india middle class people can buy cars that cost more than 10k$ to 30k$ and it is designed to replace bikes that is overloaded with 6people !!
Tata Nano is Always better than a motorcycle or a scooter that are pervasive in India. This is the most economical car in the world made for India - how can it be tested by Global NCAP? That's unfair. NCAP should test a motorcycle and scooter and compare the results with Tata Nano.
Mathias T.W.P Yes it does hurt, the price at least. If you cared to watch the video, you would see that the airbag would not save you as the car practically crushes in to your lap.
BC Jefferson the problem I feel with nano is that it sits in a price range with so low performance, features and safety that it's simply wiser to go for second hand vehicles like Toyota Starlet which is larger, safer, better performing and more reliable and will still maintain a relatively good resale value even if sold third hand.
@WORLD INFO BOX •1K SUBSCRIBE And what happens when you do crash? India isn't a country filled with Godly drivers. When that slack Jawed idiot crashes into you,you won't be alive to regret it.
@WORLD INFO BOX normally no one buys a vehicle for crashing, but many accidents are happening, why?? Because if we drive safely as possible, there is still a chance someone else crashing to us. After all we are all humans
The same story let it be on alto then they will start trolling alto calling it tin can and stuff like that.. Why us nano getting all the praise whereas alto is trolled?
Mathias Tang Wa Pedersen I doubt that very seriously. The brain must already be the least functional organ for a person actually buying a car like this.
Mathias Tang Wa Pedersen If they don't want to die, yeah, even though a 15 year old Atos would be perfectly fine in comparison to that piece of crap. Cars like this shouldn't even be supposed to be sold in Europe if it's safer to travel in a wheelbarrow.
This car is not poor man's car.. it costs 3.6 lakhs inr. It can climb mountains and can travel long distances with comfort which is better than a bike.. My friend drove 800kms without a single stop in this little beast with 4 people on board.. hats off to Ratan Tata
it cant climb mountains with a whole family in it..it wont climb...it only has 37 bhp...and its fucking not comfortable...it felt like riding..a shopping cart even motorcycles r way faster...and comfortable and stable
you do realize that the tata nano was one of the cheapest cars in the world? the extreme cost cutting for this car is because it received a 0star rating. tata's other cars did not have so much cost cutting so they were much safer
@@freefiregame302 Do not forget the 1992-2017 Mexican Nissan Tsuru or the Indian Renault Lodgy. Both are coffins on wheels. What they both have in common is they are from international brands the regularly achieve 4 or 5 star cars in Europe but have churned out zero-star cars in so-called emerging markets such as India with more lax crash safety standards by skimping on safety features just to save a few bucks.
But Tata is still better option as whether nano scored 0 stars but Suzuki's 75% car Scores 0 to 1 stars yet now as compared to Tata cars they are safest cars in Indian market💪🏻❤️love for TATA!!
@@rohancaffel4040 vaisa dekha jaye toh unki marketing strategy bhadiya bhale voh konse bhi and faltu si gadi bhi kyo na nikale e.g: new Celerio, new alto, spresso jaise kuch bhi nahihai hai unme except mileage and cng friendly engines suzuki ERA aur kya but Tata is also moving in cng and electric as well as mahindra.baat karne layak toh bohot hai par just don't debate now enjoy 😂
I would expect them to reinforce the structure. For this price you can’t expect much but they could reinforce parts of the structure not the whole thing in terms of cost cutting. This thing is discontinued so there’s no point
Atleast you can have funeral of bodies in Indian way with face uncovered when dying in a two wheeler crash. With this car I don't think there would be any body left for funeral.
Mariah Curry no, the price is not the point. The car is so unstable and easy to damage that it would'nt be worth to put airbags on it :D and youre right the Airbag would almost cost more than the car itself :D
I love नैनो I have नैनो 2012 Salute Ratan Tata 🙏❤️ से कुछ लोगो की वजह से बहुत से लोगों का सपना टूट गया बाइक से टैंपो से e रिक्शा से साइकिल से तो safe हैं पर जनता के पास अलग ही दिमाग है
Secomdo gli indiani I nostri marò sono degli assassini !?!?! Invece gli indianini che fanno circolare queste scatolette no!?!? Questi sono dei figli de na mi.........llecento sgarata in curva!
+Alessio Valente condivido appieno quanto detto da Vittorio: girano sulle ns. strade auto peggiori di queste vendute 6 - 7 anni fa... inutile nasconderlo.... auto che 5 anni fa costavano - forse - poco meno di 8-9000 euro....
@@tertommy I agree but Sir, But Ratan Tata said that this car is a family car . Infact this was for those poor (and big families) who can only afford a bike. And also this car also has a high boot space. But if a truck get on on the bike then??. Infact most of the accidents are more on bikes then compared to cars.
Well its definitely better than 4 people on one motorcycle. That's what this car is made for. Its for poor people to travel safely not for cheap people.
@@raijxin I live in the Philippines and I own a 2019 Santa Cruz Bronson Mountain Bike, it costs around $25,000 to $26,000 depending on the size. This car sucks, and I'm glad it's not in the Philippines.
On what basis u give stars, u should give max ratings based on condition of passengers after crash and minimum half if person survived with minor fracture and scratches.
This car for this price is an amazing car. I had a Maruti 800 from India. I never will have again a similar headacheless car. I just put a few petrol in and it worked year by year without any problem. In Europe for 1500 Euro only a scooter available, or a medium sized chinese quad. The Nano has windshield, roof, heating, doors. And even I think this car is nice. Many people living in villages with poor traffic. Not need the airbag, and the 5 star at all time. Many people going on 60 km/h (40 miles) on empty muddy bumpy roads in the mniddle of 2 villages. I love this car for this price.
This is actually like testing a fish in a tree climbing competition. People should understand that this car is meant for city drive at medium speeds - 50 Kmph or less where it excels in comfort and safety. Nano is not the car for driving in highways at higher speeds.
Right, because people don't drive cars above 60kmph. Do you honestly believe any actual family using the Tata Nano fervently abstains from crossing the 60kmph mark on the road? This is just an excuse, and a very poor one at that.
Me again... many of you have mentioned better than a motorcycle.... Absolutely wrong. In a motorcycle you are having the option to to divert the direction in a fraction of seconds... But in a car it is not possible. More over, the number of passengers will always be double to the number of riders on a bike.
but it is stronger than honda city,baleno, swift in real life. is this crash test rating is true. then explain please, the right A pillar only have a small bend. otherwise the steering column collapsed. this car is partially halmfull to driver only at heavy impact
nano is not a car!! guyz its an alternative to motor bikes and scooty so that middle class ppl can travel in a safe speed limit yet get the luxury of car... oh come on its a car during rain, winter, summer unlike two wheeler where you hv to halt or face the heat loo or chil wind
Hey, at least it's safer than a family of 4 riding on the back of a motorcycle.
It used coast 1k £ in today's money
Yeah bro agreed
With a motorcycle people would be thrown clear rather than being crushed to death. There's at least a slight chance of survival in the first instance.
No, it’s not.
Exactly this car was targeting people who buy motorcycle
Total cost of crash tests: 200 $
@Crantox yeah the dummies cost like 300k while the car costs like 4K lol
@@A_couple_of_cakepies base model is 3k
@@dietznutz1oh ok
22 yen
There's nothing in the front of a Nano to absorb the impact energy. That's one of the reasons it's so inexpensive. Yes, it's meant to be the replacement for a 2-wheeler, in that respect it is better. But at the same time, this car is comparable to a 1950s or '60s European car in its safety performance, and many decades later, we've learned a great deal on how to not have cars get squished into small lumps of metal in collisions.
Budget oriented car
It could use a little better front end design, maybe not so vertical and creases in the hood to help some.
But it is sorta to be expected from a $3k car lol
This car is so safe the crumple zone spans the entire length of the vehicle
I will be honest i hate this car. But am happy to say it's safer then a bike with a fmily of 4 in like they do in inida. I do hope tata makes at at least 2 star.
You are welcome
***** I agree. I don't like this car but I think I fancy my chances in this rather than on a motorbike.
You can roll away on I motorcycle or lay the bike down to save your hide in this your knees are the crumple zone so road rash or dead? Think I'll take the road rash
+Matthew Caughey In a bike the driver might well roll away in a shunt but the passengerS (usually wife & kids in India) will NOT. Over there this mousetrap of a car is better than any bike, at least the passengers have a chance to survive. Alas it was too expensive to buy anyway for the poor people at whom it was aimed, and the richer rejected it completely.
+Tim Ford Mustang .. tata is really bad company.. they only make bad car... thats all
What did you expect from India? The car costs just as mutch as 4 good tires in Europe...
+[̲̅G̲̅][̲̅A̲̅][̲̅M̲̅][̲̅E̲̅][̲̅S̲̅] [̲̅&̲̅] [̲̅M̲̅][̲̅O̲̅][̲̅R̲̅][̲̅E̲̅] If 4 good tires cost $3000 that says a lot about life in the eurozone.
+tmmurphy With rims, it's pretty close yes.
+[̲̅G̲̅][̲̅A̲̅][̲̅M̲̅][̲̅E̲̅][̲̅S̲̅] [̲̅&̲̅] [̲̅M̲̅][̲̅O̲̅][̲̅R̲̅][̲̅E̲̅] munch than 4 tires cost only $2000
+tmmurphy go to check
Yes. The quality is shoddy. But they delivered a working product. It's much better than 4 people hitching on motorcycle. And unlike China, there wasn't any copyright infringement. Only frugal engineering and manufacturing innovation. If I'm not mistaken, Nano was to Tata what Beetle was to VW.
I wrap my chicken in more metal when I roast it!
Search Nano accident and see it's real life accident
you and gcap need some knowledge
it's so funny that people are criticizing something which they have no idea about the idea behind of it. tata nano is not car promising what you expect from the result of this test. nobody including the producer acclaims that. their only concern was to create something small for the traffic. cheap and at least more secure than motorcycle for the families. it's just a car created for the low class families as a more secure alternative than driving a motorcycle with 4-5 people including small kids. it is an alternative for those families which have limited budget to buy a car. its design concerns the very crowded and slow traffic of the big cities of India. nobody can drive the car in this speed level already (in busy cities of India). the basic concern is how can make the traffic safer for these people who are using bikes with many people and they come up with this very affordable car that almost has the same price with motorcycle.
+Marie Cue That's why we have cheap second-hand cars on the market...for people who can't afford a new one, instead of riding in death trap.
+Theodor Butters Maintance cost will scratch their assets anyway, so better to have a new low cost maintenance car than second hand garbage, which will always end up in a garage every week.
+Vaibhav Vashisht (Vabby) You can pick up a 3-5 year old car for significanttly less money then a new one and still have a better car then a new one at the same price. The Nano was meant to be something cheap that Indians can afford, as the second-hand market isn't that big in poor countries with low car ownership rates. Same here in Romania. People can't afford expensive new cars (over 15k euros), so alot of people either buy second-hand cars from other countries or get cheap new cars made here. Problem is the those cheap romanian cars break up really often and you'll usually see services full of cheap domestic-made cars with every problem you can possibly imagine...
Theodor Butters Well, the point behind it was for the lower middle class people to afford a car in the rate of bike, it costs only 2000us dollars maximum.
Even a normal quality second hand hatchback costs 7000us dollars.
So you can understand.
Anyway, we Indians doesn't buy it. Lol.
Marie Cue dude it is designed for low class not meddle class here in india middle class people can buy cars that cost more than 10k$ to 30k$ and it is designed to replace bikes that is overloaded with 6people !!
They should have called it the Tata Life! Or 'Goodbye to Life', in other words!
Bike ko replace krne k purpose se banai thi bhai...
Bike se toh safe hi h....
@@piyushkanaujia4798 isko 1 lakh me tank chahiye
@@nitinthakur5952 😂😂😂
Ye indian car thi jo kwid aur alto 800 se acchi hi hai
What about this time 4star is compulsory for every Tata car
Tata Nano is Always better than a motorcycle or a scooter that are pervasive in India. This is the most economical car in the world made for India - how can it be tested by Global NCAP? That's unfair.
NCAP should test a motorcycle and scooter and compare the results with Tata Nano.
Yes it is safer than a motorcycle. But does it hurt to put at least a single airbag in that death-trap?
Mathias T.W.P Yes it does.. The thing does not have a boot lid to save cost...
Mathias T.W.P
Yes it does hurt, the price at least. If you cared to watch the video, you would see that the airbag would not save you as the car practically crushes in to your lap.
Mathias T.W.P why, an air bag would do nothing to help.
BC Jefferson the problem I feel with nano is that it sits in a price range with so low performance, features and safety that it's simply wiser to go for second hand vehicles like Toyota Starlet which is larger, safer, better performing and more reliable and will still maintain a relatively good resale value even if sold third hand.
well india has no shortage of people to be honest
That's why they took away your jobs :D
@@VishwasRavindran92 no thats why they have no jobs in their own country
@@VishwasRavindran92 Yep . . And look what they came up with , the Tata Nano . . . ;O) .
@John Boudreaux no 1.6 billion is the peak of india's population
@Ishant Keche yes
I think this was A lesson for Tata And they have learnt well from it.
Now being the safest car manufacturer of India😊
Yeah a lesson with unsuspecting test subjects called people
@WORLD INFO BOX •1K SUBSCRIBE And what happens when you do crash? India isn't a country filled with Godly drivers.
When that slack Jawed idiot crashes into you,you won't be alive to regret it.
@WORLD INFO BOX •1K SUBSCRIBE what if someone crashes at u at 70 kp/h
@@rblxplays8541 At least you'll know the occupants in the other car is safe.
@WORLD INFO BOX normally no one buys a vehicle for crashing, but many accidents are happening, why??
Because if we drive safely as possible, there is still a chance someone else crashing to us. After all we are all humans
Its safer than a motorbike with a whole family on it. It isn’t safe, but safer than that.
Keep dreaming bike more safer than this
Much safer to fly off a bike than get crushed by metal
@@dv9239 no point explaining it, Tata fanatics will never understand
The same story let it be on alto then they will start trolling alto calling it tin can and stuff like that.. Why us nano getting all the praise whereas alto is trolled?
@@char_yttit was budget oriented. And don't forget, middle class or poor people are result of " *trading* " of Britain.
It’s essentially an enclosed 4 seat quadrunner anyway, treat it as a motorcycle with a fully enclosed fairing.
Well said
Don't drive in highway and you are safe
@@venkateshr6031 WDYM?
Don't you just love it when you get impaled by the steering wheel column.
Except this car.. tata have very strong build cars.. like nexon, altroz, tigor
Yess🔥🔥
Yes hail Tatta ♥️🥰
0 airbags = 0 stars
Does it really matter when 80% of the deformation zone is the driver's knees?
Ahrle Bengtsdotter Yes. Less force on the brain. - More chance of survival.
Mathias Tang Wa Pedersen I doubt that very seriously. The brain must already be the least functional organ for a person actually buying a car like this.
Ahrle Bengtsdotter Let us all just bring them the Volvos, shall we not?
Mathias Tang Wa Pedersen If they don't want to die, yeah, even though a 15 year old Atos would be perfectly fine in comparison to that piece of crap. Cars like this shouldn't even be supposed to be sold in Europe if it's safer to travel in a wheelbarrow.
I'm a happy customer of Tata Nano.
This car is not poor man's car.. it costs 3.6 lakhs inr. It can climb mountains and can travel long distances with comfort which is better than a bike.. My friend drove 800kms without a single stop in this little beast with 4 people on board.. hats off to Ratan Tata
and my laptop is more expensive than this car. :v
And my underwear is expensive than ur laptop
R u?? Lol
it cant climb mountains with a whole family in it..it wont climb...it only has 37 bhp...and its fucking not comfortable...it felt like riding..a shopping cart even motorcycles r way faster...and comfortable and stable
It climbed one of the highest mountain In South India with 5 people...
From 0 stars ( Nano) to 5 stars ( Nexon altroz)......This is called hard work💯
you do realize that the tata nano was one of the cheapest cars in the world? the extreme cost cutting for this car is because it received a 0star rating. tata's other cars did not have so much cost cutting so they were much safer
No, that's called lagging 20 years behind first world countries and being poor.
@@ThatsMrMaxHeadroomToYou?
So basically, you should driving this car from backseat?
Plot twist: this wasn't slo-mo
I’m not all that worried by this. I’ve had a fiat panda from 1986! 🤣
guys tata nano is a good car in india because nobody can go over 40kmph in cities on an average so even if you crash you wont hurt yourself
Gautam Raj wow a new story
And when a bus or a lorry or another car hits you at high speed? Don't tell me that is a rare case. Just don't.
This crash test was done at 64 kilometers per hour.
Yes you would. If you crash into a pole at 40kmph you're dead.
Then what happens if you crash in an expressway?
that car make me stunning, indian engineering are better then indonesia, we cant even make engine
Dreamliner_MotoVid ^:£ ưh o87
We (indonesian) can make a car,but under the foreign brand
@@Fauzanarief-n7i Reminds me, those Esemka Cars are actually rebranded cars fr another company... Judging by it's shape
Even a sacred cow can flip this Nano,,,
Holy cow
Just keep your mom away from it.
@@charredskeleton haha
No
@@charredskeleton superb
The world's cheapest car may quite possibly be the world's deadliest car also!
Deadliest car? You haven't heard of Maruti?
@@freefiregame302 Do not forget the 1992-2017 Mexican Nissan Tsuru or the Indian Renault Lodgy. Both are coffins on wheels. What they both have in common is they are from international brands the regularly achieve 4 or 5 star cars in Europe but have churned out zero-star cars in so-called emerging markets such as India with more lax crash safety standards by skimping on safety features just to save a few bucks.
Tata Nano-
Where you are the crumple zone
And the whole world rejoiced when a 3,000$ car was slammed into a wall.
1500$ to be precise
Nobody would crash such cute car anyway :)
Poor Dummies Had to get on this car
+Unicorn Lol 😁
But Tata is still better option as whether nano scored 0 stars but Suzuki's 75% car Scores 0 to 1 stars yet now as compared to Tata cars they are safest cars in Indian market💪🏻❤️love for TATA!!
Forever tata🥰🔥💥
Suzuki is still the highest selling car brand in India
@@rohancaffel4040 vaisa dekha jaye toh unki marketing strategy bhadiya bhale voh konse bhi and faltu si gadi bhi kyo na nikale e.g: new Celerio, new alto, spresso jaise kuch bhi nahihai hai unme except mileage and cng friendly engines suzuki ERA aur kya but Tata is also moving in cng and electric as well as mahindra.baat karne layak toh bohot hai par just don't debate now enjoy 😂
@@OriginalGamingzOfficials I can't understand your language
Am I the only one who looks at the car like it's made entirely out of plastic 😂
I would expect them to reinforce the structure.
For this price you can’t expect much but they could reinforce parts of the structure not the whole thing in terms of cost cutting.
This thing is discontinued so there’s no point
The car’s shape and body is only a failure. No Airbags, zero seatbelts at the back of the car. The car was set for failure
For the price point and no airbags i think that car did amazing. 0 stars on this vs the same crash with 3 people on a moped???? EXACTLY...
Atleast you can have funeral of bodies in Indian way with face uncovered when dying in a two wheeler crash.
With this car I don't think there would be any body left for funeral.
This is an example, where the air bags... are your lungs!!
No airbags? Are you fucking kidding me?
This car is 2,000usd
+TruckSimz It shouldn't matter. Every car should be required to have even the most basic safety systems.
+WinXPwhiz yes but this car is selled in india
+WinXPwhiz Except that in that case, the structural deformations of the cabin are so immense, an airbag wouldn't change anything.
+WinXPwhiz Its still safer than a motorbike carrying a family of 7
i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/04/06/article-0-127D8409000005DC-830_634x356.jpg
The question that everyone ask : WHY THERE IS NO FUCKING AIRBAGS !!?!!????
it would be more expensive. This car is made for the poor people in India not for wealthy europeans.
Mariah Curry no, the price is not the point. The car is so unstable and easy to damage that it would'nt be worth to put airbags on it :D and youre right the Airbag would almost cost more than the car itself :D
Berry Blue the car is so vulnareble and easy to damage because only low quality and low cost material is used so the price is as low as possible.
COST is why.
trevor philips ߧfffffffffn
m
Fantastic!. Best car with best suicide features! :P
The Daewoo Tico is even worse :F
Infinite Tribe shut up
Wait. There are no airbags???
It is the poor mans car..... I can't think of buying any other 4 wheeler @ 1.5 lakh inr.... Obviously it is much safer than riding a 2 wheeler.
Well said dude
Tata Nano:
Dummies 0.000001 second after crash: Our time has come.
When the test is more expensive than the car.
Big props to TATA tho, they are now known for their safest cars.
I love नैनो
I have नैनो 2012
Salute Ratan Tata 🙏❤️ से
कुछ लोगो की वजह से बहुत से लोगों का सपना टूट गया
बाइक से टैंपो से e रिक्शा से साइकिल से तो safe हैं
पर जनता के पास अलग ही दिमाग है
Pessimo risultato per la Tata Nano nei Crash Test Global Ncap ... un video DA CONDIVIDERE per la sensibilizzazione alla Sicurezza Stradale
Secomdo gli indiani I nostri marò sono degli assassini !?!?! Invece gli indianini che fanno circolare queste scatolette no!?!? Questi sono dei figli de na mi.........llecento sgarata in curva!
Cos e quel coso?una macchina 50
***** e si vede che costa 1000€ basta guardare il suo crash test e il suo design un aborto dell automobilismo alla jeremy clarkson
+Alessio Valente
condivido appieno quanto detto da Vittorio: girano sulle ns. strade auto peggiori di queste vendute 6 - 7 anni fa... inutile nasconderlo.... auto che 5 anni fa costavano - forse - poco meno di 8-9000 euro....
Alessio Valente bank
It is safer then a bike according to it's cost isn't it
Nano 0 Star > Motorcycle -99 stars rating lol
Tata then 😭😭😭😭 Tata now😍😍
People then: that truck is a grave.. nah is ok
People now: it's gonna pass even if it has 0 stars.
When I watch this I keep imagining Apu saying, "Thank yoooo, crash again!"
You are dead if you crash in this car.
Steering wheel will puncture your chest.
Yup that's true with Omni also
To be honest This car designed for big families that are poor and can only afford a bike. This is a safer option from bikes and other two wheelrs.
At least on a motorcycle you would be thrown from a crash and not crushed to death in this thing.
@@tertommy I agree but Sir, But Ratan Tata said that this car is a family car . Infact this was for those poor (and big families) who can only afford a bike. And also this car also has a high boot space. But if a truck get on on the bike then??. Infact most of the accidents are more on bikes then compared to cars.
@@tertommy and second thing the company was using very cheap materials and other things in this car so fire incidents in this car were happening.
Is this car safer than a motor bike ..if yes pls get the idea why Tata introduce nano .
a bike is safer than this if all are wearing helmets
3 years iam using its city car heavy traffic it's smooth like a butter
But initial 2 cylinder pick is better??
India, the next superpower
can you believe this is the same company that makes jaguar and range rover/land rover
Well its definitely better than 4 people on one motorcycle. That's what this car is made for. Its for poor people to travel safely not for cheap people.
my laptop cost more than this car and my phone is close. I think i would be safer riding my laptop than this car
yes you can drive laptop or handphone
+steever tebest Lol nice reply
That car costs $3.5k right?
So your laptop costs more than $3.5k+?
@@raijxin I live in the Philippines and I own a 2019 Santa Cruz Bronson Mountain Bike, it costs around $25,000 to $26,000 depending on the size. This car sucks, and I'm glad it's not in the Philippines.
@@americanttm9889 you feels so because you are a cat eater
Id' rather use this than driving a motorcycle from the 70's
I wouldn't, if I was on a motorcycle I could have a cutting edge helmet and airbag jacket. HUR DUH bikes bad
@@joshuaheffernan4374 You could wear a helmet and an airbag jacket in a nano.
@@WizardMower you wouldn't be able to, not enough space. Or you'd be driving with your head sideways.
On what basis u give stars, u should give max ratings based on condition of passengers after crash and minimum half if person survived with minor fracture and scratches.
So, did they died?
This car for this price is an amazing car. I had a Maruti 800 from India. I never will have again a similar headacheless car. I just put a few petrol in and it worked year by year without any problem.
In Europe for 1500 Euro only a scooter available, or a medium sized chinese quad. The Nano has windshield, roof, heating, doors. And even I think this car is nice. Many people living in villages with poor traffic. Not need the airbag, and the 5 star at all time. Many people going on 60 km/h (40 miles) on empty muddy bumpy roads in the mniddle of 2 villages.
I love this car for this price.
I'm an Indian but I almost never saw muddy road.
Wheres the interior camera :/
This is actually like testing a fish in a tree climbing competition. People should understand that this car is meant for city drive at medium speeds - 50 Kmph or less where it excels in comfort and safety. Nano is not the car for driving in highways at higher speeds.
That's a great way to excuse 👏👏👏,
people say this when they can't digest truth. Keep it up.
Right, because people don't drive cars above 60kmph.
Do you honestly believe any actual family using the Tata Nano fervently abstains from crossing the 60kmph mark on the road?
This is just an excuse, and a very poor one at that.
It can’t even go that fast irl lol
Such a shame it wasnt made stronger.Still quite an innovative car,a missed chance for Tata.The world needs an affordable car.
The crumple zone is your body...
This car was not designed/produced for promotion of ''GLOBAL NCAP" !
Its 1000 Star Car compare to Bike salute You Ratan Tata Sir thia cars was only who not bay Bigs cars
Safer than maruti omni
Well there's your problem, you have a dummy driving it!
Me again... many of you have mentioned better than a motorcycle.... Absolutely wrong. In a motorcycle you are having the option to to divert the direction in a fraction of seconds... But in a car it is not possible. More over, the number of passengers will always be double to the number of riders on a bike.
but it is stronger than honda city,baleno, swift in real life.
is this crash test rating is true.
then explain please, the right A pillar only have a small bend. otherwise the steering column collapsed.
this car is partially halmfull to driver only at heavy impact
Wow. Narrow hood. No airbags. Definitely should be pulled from the market.
The engine survived!
In nano engine is on the back side
Even airbag can't save you on nano.
Everyone complaining about the bad results hasn't understood the point of this car
And what did you expect ? 5 stars ?
4 stars
In the back it must be quite safe then if you consider the front cabin is part of the crumble zone lol
Except that your legs would still be crushed by the engine in an accident.
You can't drive at 64KM per hour in most of the Indian roads, so the test criteria is invalid.
how come?
It's simple don't go 80km/hours just go it slowly...and if you have a crash it's not go that bad...
***** my friend use this car, even his car was hitted by cycle....and the car have a big dent....what a crap"-"
+ray mcknight or dont drive one
The car is tested at 64kph, not 80
still safer than the most expensive motorcycle
The fact that you are comparing a car to a motorcycle is worrisome.
Now Tata Motors Compact SUV Nexon became first Indian Car to get full 5star Safety a Ratings @ GNCAP
No airbags, we die like men
wo bleiben deie airbags?
Tata probably asked for that car back, rebuilt it, and sold it in India
Bike is so safety when compare to nano car😂
I didn't see any airbags?!
Uh, i want a long motorcycle instead pls, and helmets for my family.
Commonsense dictates that this car is only meant to go 30-40 Km/hr.
Pole Star it only has 36 hp. I don’t think it can even reach 60 km/h 😂
Take a Tata life insurance policy 😂😂🤣
There is absolutely no crumble zone to absorb the crash and anyway it was made smaller so can't blame that for failing in the test...
Tata was hoping for a 4 star. A company should know what they will get before the test. You need to design in strength.
nano is not a car!! guyz its an alternative to motor bikes and scooty so that middle class ppl can travel in a safe speed limit yet get the luxury of car... oh come on its a car during rain, winter, summer unlike two wheeler where you hv to halt or face the heat loo or chil wind
When it comes to motorcycle regulators be like : "its real fine in term of safety, let ban mini cars like tata nano instead"
As it turns out, a pair of second hand flip flops do not make a suitable crumple zone...
Really? Not even an airbag ?. Indian roads are notoriously dangerous, a lot of people die in auto accidents everyday
Nah! I've seen worse!