Comparing Meshtastic, Beartooth MkII, and goTenna Pro Radios for ATAK

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 390

  • @Howard_Roark
    @Howard_Roark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +99

    I am literally in the middle of testing Beartooth MK2, SpecFive Meshtastic ATAK, Gotenna x2

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Nice! Let me know what you find.

    • @Howard_Roark
      @Howard_Roark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Honestly.
      Beartooth is expensive the most important part that did not talk enough about is that Gateway is over $2000 which you have to have to use an ATAK server. Even if you build your own.
      Bear tooth does voice and it’s pretty darn good. And none of the others in civilian price ranges do voice. It’s not bad at all. The pictures taken anywhere between 2 to 3 minutes to send but they’re not bad.
      If Beartooth didn’t charge so much money for a gateway, it would be more interesting even if they allowed you to use a radio to connect to your own server.
      But the fact that the gateway is so much money, it’s really hard to justify.
      I will say the updates and messages are near real time which is very impressive. But I always come back to the Gateway price.
      The CEO of Beartooth will respond to you himself and is actively engaged with the customers.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      Yeah, the Gateway is pretty steep for what you get. I think you could replicate the functionality with your own TAK server and a wifi router to bridge to a phone with a regular Beartooth node, but we haven't tried that yet.
      But yeah, actually real-time traffic is important. And having an accessible team to talk to is huge.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@T.REXLabs the value in the Gateway is in the software. there is some pretty heavy duty networking code to handle all the security aspects plus bridging an IP network to a non IP network. Its arguably pretty low priced versus the networking capability the end user is getting.

    • @binkybinkster9425
      @binkybinkster9425 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@BeartoothRadioInc caca

  • @chadl.981
    @chadl.981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    I am an integrator for Silvus mesh radios. Good products. Primary clients are LE. I am glad to see a review of more "civilian friendly" mesh radios. Thanks TREX LABS.

    • @Pocket_Qs
      @Pocket_Qs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What’s considered not civilian friendly other than the military’s own use ?

    • @Sethiol73
      @Sethiol73 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure what the difference is between the Silvus for civs and Silvus for military is but the Silvus used by the military has a decent range. Typically about 2-5km depending antenna placements, interference, etc.

    • @chadl.981
      @chadl.981 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sethiol73 Yeah that is what we typically see as well concerning ranges. We "soft" mounted one to a Hughes MD 550 helicopter once for testing and reached significantly further than typical ground deployment. I believe the only difference between civ and mil versions, is the bands allowed to transmit on.

    • @Sethiol73
      @Sethiol73 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@chadl.981 We recently did a test with a UAS and got further than we would expect with VHF/SINCGARS. If you can believe that.

    • @DrMetropolis
      @DrMetropolis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Law enforcement are civilians too. We need to stop putting them outside of us. They are NOT military, despite how badly they'd like to LARP as one.

  • @peshno13
    @peshno13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

    Trex labs is my favorite Trex channel.

    • @danielkemp4860
      @danielkemp4860 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Isaac is my favourite Botkin 🙌

    • @alexz5336
      @alexz5336 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No drama and all business

    • @washingtoncommandcenter5541
      @washingtoncommandcenter5541 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@danielkemp4860 Facts, Isaac = Best Botkin

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@alexz5336 ... What? You must not have seen my twitter feed.

    • @micahmal
      @micahmal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      100% agree, sharing info we want to know, no showing off, just nerding out with us, and no drama

  • @SheFlungDung
    @SheFlungDung 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Awesome vid. Easily digestible for a complex subject. Thanks for putting free content out for us not so wealthy folks who want to prep. Remember Proverbs 27:17.

  • @DonovanGoodwin
    @DonovanGoodwin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The Meshtastic mesh where i live is phenomenal. Consistently getting almost 80 miles using only 2 or 3 hops. Its all about infrastructure. For example we have a few nodes on peaks that look down on the valley that allow for crazy range. I get for tactical use infrastructure usually needs to be man portable but i bet you could find a way to make a meshtastic range extender man portable.

  • @TrashcanMan8
    @TrashcanMan8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    I've had a set of BTR MK2s for a few months now and love them. They're literally plug and play and just work compared to my team metastatic boards. Learning more about Pi devices to make my own ATAK server currently (Zero Tier works great, but I wanna keep learning). Beartooth also just recently started their own TAK server which works great as well...

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      thank you for the feecback!

  • @austinmesh
    @austinmesh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    Nice comparison video. We just did a great interview over on our channel about getting the infrastructure set up for Meshtastic which would help support ATAK, or whatever use case, across a town or city.
    The range claims here definitely don't seem right though. Current record for meshtastic is 300km. We're regularly getting 20+

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Yeah, we think this is what Meshtastic is great at; big static meshes for wider community use. Messages would not be instantaneous, but they don't need to be for most applications.

    • @austinmesh
      @austinmesh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@T.REXLabs Prepare for the most likely scenarios first, right?

    • @BrewMeister27
      @BrewMeister27 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Meshtastic range is mostly dependent on typography. The Lora radios pretty much need line of sight, so if you live in Kansas, your range can be very impressive. Big cities or mountainous regions require a lot more nodes to ensure coverage.

    • @KalashniKEV762
      @KalashniKEV762 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BrewMeister27 Big cities have lots of nodes though. Good luck building a mesh in nothingville, unless you are going to fund it yourself and build it yourself.

    • @austinmesh
      @austinmesh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@BrewMeister27 That's true of all of these mesh radios. None of the radios mentioned in this video support BLOS

  • @Sinzuke8472
    @Sinzuke8472 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I have a little EDC heltac v3. Mostly for hiking and communication with the wify. 20 bucks plus 5 euro battery and a free thingeverse case printed by a friend. As a network and security engineer this technology is very intriguing.

  • @CluelessRanchHand
    @CluelessRanchHand 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Thank you for going over all this. I'm currently working on together putting a a local mesh Network for our brush trucks for wildland ops.

  • @nonsquid
    @nonsquid 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    My power company has been installing Meshtastic transceivers all over the countryside for their power meter network.
    Aliexpress sells the LoRa32 V2.1_1.6 Version 915Mhz ESP32 LoRa OLED 0.96 Inch SD Card Bluetooth WIFI Wireless Module ESP-32 SMA for about 23 bucks. Tiny display but it does work and it has an antenna.

  • @FragEightyfive
    @FragEightyfive 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great comparison in one video. What a wide range of use cases. I like that this space is very well segmented and use cases / customer is fairly well defined.

  • @BeartoothRadioInc
    @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Thank you TREX for the shout out and informative video!

    • @Vinn_K
      @Vinn_K 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Everything is perfect with Beartooth other than improvements need to be made with ruggedization, built-in ptt button or in house ptt accessories, and PRICE. User friendliness is what I like to see and absolutely deserve praise for, just most people can not swallow the price tag, if you guys lower the price, and more people are going to use them and buy them, it would be a better advertisement than anything.
      But at the end, it's just my opinion.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vinn_K thank you for your feedback, we are working as hard as we can to drive price down, use the TREX code to save! lots of third party PTT devices on the market.

    • @bthemedia
      @bthemedia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vinn_Kprice is a matter of market forces and business sustainability… if/once these get more popularly adopted - only then can the price possibly come down.

    • @Vinn_K
      @Vinn_K 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bthemedia Then we are at a loop, because the price is high for what it is, not many will buy it, and because of no one buy it the price stays high. At the very least I can see it being utilized at hard core airsoft events, and most people there can't just throw 750 at it, me personally would have no problems paying 500 which is already high for a lot of people. Let's put the cost of the parts at 200, 300 for the software and future support of said software and future development is in my opinion, quite fair.

    • @Mr.Anderson-y2j
      @Mr.Anderson-y2j 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please make more units and bring costs down.

  • @WeBreatheOxy
    @WeBreatheOxy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Why does no one tie one to a balloon with a 200ft string?

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      That is a completely workable, practical, usable strategy.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      this actually a very good idea. we tie Beartooth to a kite to achieve this

    • @bobbyileta6185
      @bobbyileta6185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Done.
      Szenario Desaster:
      - cheap
      - easy
      - Portable
      - good performance
      - with led flashlight it’s a beacon
      But
      - danger to aircrafts
      Szenario Tactical
      - only for knowen places like camps

    • @AlwaysPreparedSolutions
      @AlwaysPreparedSolutions 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That just happened in Cedar Rapids at a HAM meet. I was getting signal from really far. I think FAA starts to get involved with that, though

    • @freedomfalcon
      @freedomfalcon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Some guys in Canada did this with meshtastic using a weather balloon. Got 128 miles ground to air.

  • @salgarnica9328
    @salgarnica9328 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    so nice to have a serious channel that doesn't tear others down

  • @kevinmartin8679
    @kevinmartin8679 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Well done, I did my masters thesis on Lora, and utilizing them in the UAS space like ADSB.

  • @WuzzzintME
    @WuzzzintME 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I would still like to see a T-Rex meshtastic device. Honestly, even if it was just a waterproof shell. Pick which meshtastic device you like the best, and develop an actually professionally built shell that isn't 3D printed.
    I agree with your conclusion that BearTooth is probably best for the consumer, but meshtastic still has the public channel that makes it the digital text equivalent of CB radio which gives meshtastic an advantage towards what I think is your audience: the armed citizen. BearTooth still is much better for the pre-organized group, but when things happen, will we be with our pre-organized group? or will we be figuring it all out on the fly
    And if I still have your attention, please make the shell for the T-Beam Supreme

  • @jeffdavis2029
    @jeffdavis2029 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    My hat goes off to you. Thank you so much for taking the time out to put these types of videos together. You’re a great American brother.

  • @TheWesman45
    @TheWesman45 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is the video I've been waiting on. I'd also like to see what these can't do compared to Silvus or MPU.
    Edit: Nvm, you covered it.

  • @KOprops
    @KOprops 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Love this! I use Beartooth, and while I am a complete and total novice with coms… it works quite well for me.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thank you for the feedback!

  • @polarexpeditionmedic
    @polarexpeditionmedic 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want to take a moment and thank you for the great content as well as the quality of your videos.

  • @TheKurtlocker
    @TheKurtlocker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’ve used all three of these pretty extensively and agree with your assessment. The Beartooth are typically my recommendation but the performance of the GoTenna is difficult to argue with. One thing that absolutely drives me up a wall about the GoTenna units is the connector though. It’s 2024 and why it isn’t USB-C is in my opinion, unacceptable.

    • @Tragic387
      @Tragic387 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Their new pro device will come with usb-c, but they were working on that over a year ago so who knows when it’ll come out.

  • @kgchrome
    @kgchrome 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    if you want the best battery performance (and do not want WIFI), go with RAK 19007/19003 meshtastic kit. for solar repeaters you want a RAK.
    if you do not want to participate in the general mesh, you can exclude Long Fast as your primary channel, and use your own channel name with a private key. i believe this means you cannot utilize other peoples nodes for mesh traffic. a private channel above channel 1, with a private key set to Long Fast will still utilize the public mesh.
    also, a RAK on a wing drone instead of a quad drone can give you much longer loiter time that a 30m quad flight. pushing hours.

  • @tylerhall6455
    @tylerhall6455 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Excellent video on this stuff. I'm a radio guy myself (ham radio operator), and I admit I know very little about the mesh radios out there besides the basics. Thinking about buying some of the meshtastic stuff up to tinker with and develop some skills off them. Thanks!

    • @BrandonJ131
      @BrandonJ131 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do it. It's a lot of fun. I do prefer the Rak 19007's when it comes to boards. But an inexpensive 2 pack of Heltec V3s with 3dbi antennas on Amazon are like ~$53 and a great start to get your feet when. But battery life sucks. So I prefer a Rak 19007 without screen and 1100mah gets you 4+ days of battery life.

  • @terryevans1976
    @terryevans1976 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As an RF specialist you did a very good job with this.

  • @kinvert
    @kinvert 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Did a little digging. Sorry if I missed it, but one thing important to point out (IMO) is that Meshtastic has a Python API.
    Thanks for all your content.

    • @AlwaysPreparedSolutions
      @AlwaysPreparedSolutions หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kinvert that is important!

    • @warspirit9488
      @warspirit9488 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AlwaysPreparedSolutions Why is that important?

    • @AlwaysPreparedSolutions
      @AlwaysPreparedSolutions 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@warspirit9488 understanding which OS is used for the programming could sway which device a person wishes to choose.

  • @user-tv4lz5ie5u
    @user-tv4lz5ie5u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Meshing around

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      meshing!

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simply meshing about in boats...

    • @dafunkmonster
      @dafunkmonster 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not if NextNav gets their way.

  • @bedngrs
    @bedngrs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I’ve been looking for exactly this!!!❤

  • @someamateur2853
    @someamateur2853 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I feel that meshtastic is the way to go for my budget. I'm sure Beartooth nodes are great but for one of those I can get 5 nice meshtastic nodes.
    I've been playing around with a pair of TBeam Supremes. From my testing they can get signal through 1/4 mile of flat woods consistently. On a lake with line of sight it has gone over 6 miles.

  • @bthemedia
    @bthemedia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great technical comms and market survey comparison as always Isaac, much appreciated! Understanding the pros/cons of each platform on the price/performance spectrum is really helpful for making informed buying decisions… and C2 or Move/Shoot/Communicate - the secure comms is perhaps the most important of mission effectiveness - especially when it’s communicating valuable and timeline information/intel.

  • @Lynxdefense
    @Lynxdefense 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That affiliate shout out at the end for other creators was hella cool. Great video!

  • @MyWoodenshoe
    @MyWoodenshoe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There's a guy in Eastern TN who is building weather-proof solar charging Meshtastic nodes with a multiwatt antenna for $250. They're a bit heavy, though, so it's much more of a base camp system.

  • @jicire
    @jicire 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This has been my question for months. Thank you!

  • @Segphalt
    @Segphalt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Meshtastic 2.0 and beyond are not flood (hell even the prior version doesnt flood in the way this video describes, with everything repeating, it selects at random who repeats.)
    On current version devices on the edge of the transmiters range transmit first to try and get the longest hops in there is also additional priority given to systems that mark themselves as routers being their core function.

    • @crasian420
      @crasian420 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you know this guy knows what hes talking about from just the name

  • @jordanpohl6856
    @jordanpohl6856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    @TREX LABS you should look into the RFinder M6 and M1s paired with a beartooth. The Rfinders are radios with an midrange android chip set and full screen that have options for larger power source in the size range of the MPU5. I think there is a sweet spot with them as they run FOSA's olympus, ATAK, radio, and cellular out of the box, if we could merge meshtac radios into that packaged easily then we are cooking with gas.

  • @JAT_4321
    @JAT_4321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The majority of people into preparedness probably won’t buy a single beartooth, much less enough of them to have a serious network. (Most won’t even buy a $300 anytone to have an encrypted handheld) You could have a great little Meshtastic network for the price of a single beartooth. You can have an awesome meshtastic network for the price of a pair of beartooth devices. A $650 price difference per node just isn’t justifiable to the majority of people IMO. The performance boost to price increase can’t be worth it.
    However, I am excited to see how this space improves and evolves over the next few years.

    • @Segphalt
      @Segphalt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      If you know your way around electronics it's also quite easy to get a meshtastic radio connected to a relatively small solar panel and keep it charged for basically ever at least until the battery age keeps it from making it through the night and the occasional seasonal string of bad weather.
      A particularly industrious person could even dawn a high vis vest and some climbing equipment and mount the whole thing on a telephone pole at the top of a hill and install it without anyone so much as batting an eye going unnoticed for a year or more.

    • @JAT_4321
      @JAT_4321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Segphalt yeah the modularity and portability of Meshtastic is great. It doesn’t take much to learn it all.

    • @tylerhall6455
      @tylerhall6455 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your completely right. These mesh radios are useless unless you have a few of them for the other people you want to communicate with. Id say 90 percent of us preppers are basically lone wolf types that don't have that coin to spend on mesh radios to just sit somewhere waiting to hand out. And if we did, the people we would hand them to wouldn't have any clue how to use them even with some instruction. If you don't have "a group, 'with money' ", just buy and stock a dozen baofeng HT's...

    • @JAT_4321
      @JAT_4321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tylerhall6455 Yeah the Baofeng stash is a good baseline for preparedness.The next step would probably be encrypted Handhelds radios over any mesh devices.
      However,l Meshtastic is super easy for people who have no desire to learn radio stuff to use. If they can text, they can use Meshtastic. It's a good neighborhood type thing that gives the ability for encryption and has a lower signature than radios. Pros and cons.

    • @KalashniKEV762
      @KalashniKEV762 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly. Beartooth is a ripoff. Also, you can build 2 x very nice nodes for $100, not 1.

  • @JamesHuston-e9g
    @JamesHuston-e9g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    LoRa isn't just for comms. There's a whole host of environmental monitoring applications and modules available. Want to know if a gate has been opened or something is chasing your livestock, Heltec has a node for that. RAK also has a heap of add on modules. Movement, gas detection, IR detection, vibration and more.

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, it's arguably more valuable for other types of network traffic that can the shorter messaged, scheduled checks, and triggered by other actions. I would love to rig up an entire farm with lora sensors. The cloud-based smart home is over; smart off-grid farms are the new notness!

  • @kmemz
    @kmemz 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    With Meshtastic, you can get a Heltec board, antenna, and battery kit for about $37, then you can inhale a $1.50 pack of tic tacs, and once you cut an antenna port into the tic tac box the battery and board fit in quite nicely for a final cost under $40. I got two of those on the way, and I have a T-Deck Plus also on the way, I'm hoping the performance is good enough to keep in contact with my grandparents and friends in low contact situations, though I suspect I'll have to buy some to use as pure repeaters if I want to ensure signal through my whole town, mount them high as I can with a beefy antenna.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      TicTac-tastics sound even better than Altoid Tin QRP radios.

  • @YouTubeDoxedMyRealName
    @YouTubeDoxedMyRealName 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I mean you can just get a mini or "travel" router for $50-150 and just put them in a mesh network and connect ur phone or tablet or PC and just used the standard TAK coms since ur all on the same LAN. A travel router is small and light enough to strap to a drone as well if say you want to increase your range and they could be ran of a small solar panel and battery if you want to simply place a node. You can power it from any 12v capable PD battery pack via a 12v adapter that request the appropriate voltage. Being on standard modern wifi gives you high bandwidth and blends in, in an urban environment plus you get encryption. Also ur router will automatically switch between 2.5, 5 and 6ghz depending on ur distance to other routers. With the correct firmware you can switch TX power on the fly by simply logging into the router and changing the power setting. Basically what im saying is these devices aside from the commercial devices are trying to reinvent the wheel and the commercial devices are basically customized wifi...

    • @fortusvictus8297
      @fortusvictus8297 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The way I understand the issue is not just footprint but power requirements and range. You could do all that with wifi, but need far more power and range is even more of an issue.

    • @YouTubeDoxedMyRealName
      @YouTubeDoxedMyRealName 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fortusvictus8297 A travel router does not consume much power and a standard consumer router does not consume much more. Power can be provided by a not garbage battery pack like you would use for mobile devices or laptops. Range can be extended by the router auto switching to 2.4Ghz which is built into the wifi protocol as long as you leave 2.4Ghz enabled as meshed devices move apart they will automatically do what they need to do to stay connected. They also automatically channel hop as long as you leave channel set to auto. I use enterprise AP's and I get wifi from my house a few streets over on my phone and it works fine granted environmental variables are always a factor.
      You can also put a router or AP on a drone and tether it to a battery pack or vehicle for power for both the AP and drone to extend your range. Another thing you can do is place an AP on a high roof somewhere and hang it over the edge. If you use a device with detachable antennas or solder on a TNC connector you can use a light weight compact directional antenna for extended directional communications which would extend the range of every meshed device connected to your router or AP by quite a bit while reducing your signature for long range coms.
      So basically with a single instruction session you can get everyone in your group setup on coms which pretty much do most everything automatically as long as you preset-up the devices all anyone might have to do is place an AP or connect a different antenna occasionally or plug in a cell phone or sat phone (I recommend plugin in those devices for 1 charging and 2 keeping more wireless channels open and 3 signature reduction) but wireless in also an option for those.
      You can connect a cellular or satcom device to the mesh via wifi or USB / Eathernet to truncate your coms threw additional networks. As long as your devices are set up for a VPN and the VPN is set to auto connect you can relatively safely (tho I would try to limit this method to as necessary as anything going threw another network is still a risk) communicate with anyone anywhere with minimal fuss and all these devices are already designed to do all of this automatically as long as the devices are set up that way. So for example you can have dedicated de-googled cell phones which only use is to connect a mesh network directly to other such devices / networks threw the internet via VPN and of course you can use ur satcom device of choice as well tho satcom may draw more attention than a cellular device and offer significantly lower data rates unless its Starlink or something but Starlink would no longer be a hand held device until Elon decides he wants to release something like that.

  • @SteelWolf13
    @SteelWolf13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I like the topo map used to break up segments. Wonder if it's available to download? I kinda just want to stare are it for a while while it rotates.

  • @andrewdaw6050
    @andrewdaw6050 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Can you do some content on secure android devices? I like the idea of mesh radios and ATAK, but not really keen on running my android phone in the field for all sorts of reasons. I know Beartooth sell and android device in one of their kits, but its also expensive and spending another pile of money on a companion phone just makes it even more cost prohibitive.

  • @p38sheep
    @p38sheep 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    No one mentioned Doodle Labs mesh. Basically a beartooth priced mpu5. Very interesting piece of kit

  • @TimLewallen
    @TimLewallen 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video. Turn key Meshtastic devices are getting cheaper. The T-Echo Lillygo is only $55 and the SensCAP Card Tracker is $40.

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'll be testing the Card Tracker whenever it ships. It's only 100ma, but it can talk to a bigger node somewhere else, I guess ...

  • @jordanhayes519
    @jordanhayes519 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'd like to see the range tests you ran-- current official record for meshtastic is about 158miles with basic antennas. The range is not a function of power so much, but a function of hearing--LoRa devices can 'hear' at over -20db under the noise floor, which is insane and accounts for their very low power yet impressive distance. We get over 40 miles easily with well placed nodes in our southern Wyoming network. And surprisingly good propagation even in mountainous terrain.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, if you get enough elevation and run slow mode and set up two fixed nodes specifically to set range records, 100 miles is pretty simple. When you are crawling around in the weeds with omnis, it's a slightly different story.

    • @jordanhayes519
      @jordanhayes519 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@T.REXLabs True different story. But I believe those records were set with omni's. We're still continually surprised how well the LoRa protocol works though. In any case, would love to see the range tests of the Gotennas! I thought I saw on their website ranges in the 1-2km range with good LOS, which is what one would expect from radios yes, using 2m-ish band at 5w, but no super efficient below-noise-floor capable digital protocol.

    • @KboxLabs
      @KboxLabs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@T.REXLabs We did the Meshtastic record by taking multiple trace routes from 2 different (stock) handheld devices with junky 2dbi OMNIs with ok SWR. We also did a 173km range test with junky omni snapped in half. 254km was done on the LongFast setting (not slow) to simulate the default settings. It would have easily done that distance even on the fastest setting. We have unofficial airborn records well over 400km. Yes this was line of sight, but was also point to point with the Fresnel zone showing almost 100% blocked in the mapping calculations. While urban point to point can be limited by sheer terrain, just 1 extra well placed node (on a water tower or roof) will give a blanket signal for the entire area. After all, these are all mesh devices we are talking about. If there’s a mountain in between you, doesn’t matter what device you use, you’ll still need a repeater of some sort. Meshtastic should really be at the top of the chart for both range and price.

  • @brian_AG
    @brian_AG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    @10:49, I believe you meant to say "PLI" data, (Position Location Infornation), versus LPI (Low-Probability of Intercept). You spoke about both in this video, so I wanted to make sure no one gets confused if they're watching this, lol.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I also meant to say Low Probability of Detect, which is an additional mistake.

  • @warriorgospel8168
    @warriorgospel8168 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    More interesting than drones is a rugged balloon that is small enough to carry and not attract too much attention in some areas while also being tethered. Theoretically the balloon could stay up in the air longer and possibly go higher. I haven't done enough research but I'm willing to bet this could be a lower cost, rapidly deployable/ retractable method for putting a mesh device high enough to get impressive range. Should also be less expensive.

  • @kerbalairforce8802
    @kerbalairforce8802 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

    Beartooth is over priced, Gotenna stopped selling to civilians or supporting people who already bought them. The only solution for this is Meshtastic.

    • @BeastHunterSam
      @BeastHunterSam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I just wish it didn't suck....

    • @TheRealBigEE
      @TheRealBigEE 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Furthermore beartooth doesn’t even support a hardware PTT. You going to ask that much and are missing critical features? No thanks.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@TheRealBigEE great news. We support all kinds of PTT hardware. Ranging from Samsung X Cover PTT key to Klein PTT to Aina and more to come!

    • @TheRealBigEE
      @TheRealBigEE 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@BeartoothRadioIncinteresting. A lot of people are running things like Peltor or Sordin. Currently I’m unaware of any solution to integrate these common headsets. Would love to see direct PTT into beartooth much like the mpu5 or Harris radios

    • @scootle74
      @scootle74 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      The fact Beartooth keeps getting influencers to shill for them with "discount codes" to drop the price per node to $750 or whatever is kind of laughable.
      Sell it for what it costs to make it viable in the market, period. Don't play these "discount" games with everyone for social media clout, imho.

  • @michaelnyden8056
    @michaelnyden8056 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We just need more competition here to drive down beartooth pricing. Or someone make a very good, seamless meshtastic plugin for atak than is currently available.

    • @isaacbotkintrex
      @isaacbotkintrex 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The biggest bottleneck for mashtastic is not so much the plug-in, but the actual network speed and traffic routing of LoRa.

  • @jimmystikx
    @jimmystikx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn't there a way to integrate ATAK into a wifi stack? Using a wifi mesh with a vhf/uhf backbone for longer distance/ out of 2.4ghz range stuff seems doable.

  • @EndoftheBlock7224
    @EndoftheBlock7224 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    FreqHop is old tech but it makes your signal almost impossible to block AND if you create a personalized security key and timing, well good luck breaking into those comms wether digital or voice.

  • @JoeDoorVal
    @JoeDoorVal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    lets go🔥, been waiting for this!!

  • @erichexter6631
    @erichexter6631 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we have come along way in the last 3 years.

  • @bobbyileta6185
    @bobbyileta6185 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank u for the video and cannel.
    Greetings from Germany

  • @toniwilson6210
    @toniwilson6210 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mesh might not necessarily own the future of communications yet, but I would bet that mesh is transformative of future communications in some way.

  • @DarpaProperty
    @DarpaProperty หลายเดือนก่อน

    Underrated channel.

  • @forrestmousseau8146
    @forrestmousseau8146 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    does Beartooth MKII integrate with peltors and similar earpro?

  • @theronslee214006
    @theronslee214006 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice beartooth ad

  • @michaelstora70
    @michaelstora70 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Don't overlook the Lilygo T-Echo for Meshtastic. It is an all in one for about $63. Has the SX1262 radio chip and is the only Lilygo unit with the power-sipping nRF52 processor.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yep, that's a good combo.

  • @bedngrs
    @bedngrs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So when do we get RDF on 60ghz?

  • @stupidityonly478
    @stupidityonly478 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Isaac!

  • @RenThraysk
    @RenThraysk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Have you played with WiFi HaLow?
    Like AsiaRF's ARFHL-UM, which is 900Mhz HaLow & regular 2.4Ghz wifi portable mesh device for $180.

    • @markeveren5072
      @markeveren5072 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i have a question about wifi halow devices......even if internet and whole power grid goes down....could you still use these to communicate with each other?

    • @Porty1119
      @Porty1119 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, so long as you can provide the devices with power via solar, batteries, or a generator. WiFi works just fine as an intranet for local-area connectivity with no link back to the broader internet.

    • @markeveren5072
      @markeveren5072 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Porty1119 thank you. what is the max range in miles?

    • @markeveren5072
      @markeveren5072 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Porty1119 what is max range in miles, and the asiaRF device is what you would recommend?

  • @touge242
    @touge242 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This comms stuff is cool, how does one find a battle buddy?

  • @pewdeals
    @pewdeals 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    YeeHaw. Looking forward to this one.

  • @prestonm4s
    @prestonm4s 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You should check out the T-deck with the extended battery ham radio crash course showed one recently

  • @SixtyAteWhiskey
    @SixtyAteWhiskey 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just made a video on the MPU5 , never heard of the goTenna, would love to get hands on with that system.

  • @chuck110001
    @chuck110001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd never even heard of beartooth before this.

  • @Rambozo79
    @Rambozo79 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder if/when we will start seeing plugins and software to integrate the Vero radios with ATAK. The GMRS Pro or Vr-N76 type radios would probably work great for this.

  • @EmCommSolutions
    @EmCommSolutions 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One more comment, you should also look at the Doodle Labs Mesh Rider Radios.

  • @JJ999X
    @JJ999X 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It left me little bit unclear. Can you use voice in ATAK with Meshtactics ?

    • @sniporbob
      @sniporbob 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No. With Meshtastic there's a voice-to-text feature for creating messages, and a text-to-speech feature for reading them out to you, but for actually sending your own voice you need Beartooth.

  • @robertdole5391
    @robertdole5391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cheap long range antennae is a few helium balloons 🎈 and a mesh radio attached to the ground. Can stay up for days. No need to even be co-located.

  • @BeastHunterSam
    @BeastHunterSam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Beartooth would move so much inventory at 300 a piece.

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      and lose a ton of money..... that wouldn't cover the bill of materials.....(-:

    • @BeastHunterSam
      @BeastHunterSam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      @BeartoothRadioInc yeah dawg, I simply do not believe that.
      If you said you had to offset R&D costs that'd be fair, but PCB boards and Microprocessors aren't THAT expensive. Even the case is just additive manufacturing.
      Stop grifting. You're just giving people a reason to stay with meshtastic and that's the last thing you want to do when your main competitor is open source. The more people you drive away with your cash grab the faster they're gonna grow.
      I wish you a happy bankruptcy

    • @BeartoothRadioInc
      @BeartoothRadioInc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BeastHunterSam thank you for the feedback. the main radio srack is $100 alone. add in other components and mechanical housing, antenna, battery.... and you are correct there is years of R&D plus ongoing software development to support ATAK, iTAK, Android, and iOS,.

    • @BeastHunterSam
      @BeastHunterSam 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@BeartoothRadioInc ok so say that instead of lying about material costs

    • @bthemedia
      @bthemedia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@BeastHunterSamgo ahead and bring your own “Beartooth” to the market at a better price performance value… I’ll wait. Otherwise, complaining about cost is one of the most baseless points to argue… especially after Isaac pointed out the current market options and price/value curve. Folks invest $750 on a rifle or optic, each of these comms tools should be considered as well. A vortex $750 optic with lifetime warranty is reassuring, not sure of Beartooth warranty support but presume it’s better than Meshtastic.

  • @noodledajuice1114
    @noodledajuice1114 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Soas long as I have these out and about I have range? Does this work just like a walkie talkie FM? I. Just not fully understanding how this is applied.

  • @bubbleman441
    @bubbleman441 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just got a few lora radios on meshtastic and integrated them into ATAK-Civ. I've been working on getting my DJI drone working in ATAK with the UAS plugin. I'd love to see you do a video on this. I've been having issues with ATAK crashing while using the plugin.

  • @ifell3
    @ifell3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The Beartooth might be a better option. I've seen a few videos where meshtastic has been over saturated with everyone jumping onto them, this has been an issue at a few conventions. There have been a few different modes, but rather than hacking, they could be useless by over-saturating the frequency.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And forcing meshtastic nodes to "out" themselves by sending out traffic and listening to it repeat.

  • @tylerfrogley1227
    @tylerfrogley1227 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How long will that coupon for Beartooth last? I just don’t have buddies running it quite yet

  • @Setrias
    @Setrias 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When it comes to ATAK I'm planning to find and buy some 802.11ah WiFi HaLow APs/routers which operate at the ~900MHz band... It could probably work like a LAN but I'll see...

  • @hotrodmcspoonjr
    @hotrodmcspoonjr 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Question for guys who know more about these devices… if someone near you had a similar device, would they be able to receive your information? Like say I’m using a pair of beartooth mk II and someone within range had the same device, would they be able to see my location, see messages sent, voice, etc?

  • @ericdincauze3984
    @ericdincauze3984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How about you send the Meshtastic node up on a tethered weather ballon? No limited battery flight times.

    • @daa3417
      @daa3417 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Balloons are only good for temp setups like incident response.

    • @ChrisBurnes
      @ChrisBurnes 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@daa3417 Fair observation, A lot of use cases people are planning on using this for would fall into an "incident response" category.
      Comms down, balloon up.

    • @redavni1
      @redavni1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Find tallest tree, strap a long thin antenna to the top, or use another drone with a repeater to fly to top of tree and land. Seems simpler if the terrain allows.

  • @gadsdenfree
    @gadsdenfree หลายเดือนก่อน

    WNC could use this BIG TIME right now.

  • @freedomfalcon
    @freedomfalcon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Beartooth is too expensive for what most people can afford even with the discount code. Would like to see more meshtastic content. Also the background music during the range part starting at 5:08 goes HARD. What song is it?

  • @user-xr2nu9jf4l
    @user-xr2nu9jf4l หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anybody know what is the name of the video he talks about @ 16:33-35?

  • @djr113
    @djr113 หลายเดือนก่อน

    West happens when star link is available?

  • @quatre1559
    @quatre1559 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ​@T.REXLabs so is beartooth just an xb pro2 module configured for digital only networking? what makes beartooth different then just using a set of modules from someplace like digikey? they even sell an 'industrial node' for way less than beartooth. I'm not trying to shit on your affiliate, but.. that's a lot of money for 'factory device setup'

  • @ihn
    @ihn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great video.

  • @Venom2U
    @Venom2U 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Trex, I have to take issue with a few statements on meshtastic. So, who am I to question/correct the great and all mighty "Trex"?...... I'm no one....... And I like it that way. However, I do have 90+ active mesh nodes in my state. For nearly 100% coverage of my state. And I/We have learned quite a lot about meshtastic over the past few years.
    First issue- Bat life, you mentioned the Beartooth lasting a "day or more" as though that was/is a "pro"...... You do realize the Old "T-beam" (which are horribly inefficient compared to current designs) will last a week+ with a single 18650? (+- 2500mah nmc bat) With the current energy efficient designs we see 2+ weeks on a single 18650 charge........ Add in a 3 dollar solar panel and you can ignore energy usage completely.... This is of course somewhat dependent in network usage. And strongly dependent on temperature. (Pro tip - Skip both NMC and LFP battery chemistries all together, and go straight to LTO. LTO performance in freezing temps is Orders of magnitude better than NMC or LFP)
    Second issue - Range. I don't understand how you're only getting 1-2k out of your system/s. As far as I know the current record is just under 200 miles for a point-to-point connection (LOS @ 1watt). I/We routinely see 100+ mile connections (point-to-point) (early days before we filled in the network). Though to be fair the vast majority of my nodes are 200-300+ feet in the air. That being said; I find it hard to believe 1-2k range with a proper setup and a good antenna. Max +2dbi for a "ground unit", NO MORE than +2dbi. And No more than +6dbi for a fixed node. (intracity, Assuming its up high) However intercity can use +9-12dbi nodes to cover the miles. (Pro tip - Use a +9-12dbi node co-located with a 0-+2dbi node to cover mountain top to mountain top AND cover the valleys between)
    Third issue - Network response and data throughput. Sure, you're NOT going to VIOP or facetime over a lora network. However, I vehemently disagree that a lora network is unsuitable for ATAK usage. Sure, it is "sluggish" for 1080p+ rez pics. You simply write your TTP's to minimize large file usage. Aside from large files, we have actually tested send-receive-respond (in ATAK) to +-750ms over 200 miles separation............. How much faster does a network need to be to qualify for ATAK in your eyes? IMO +- 750ms (over 200 miles) is MORE than "fast enough" for tactical operations........
    Last issue - The statement of "90% of your network is spent transmitting other peoples stuff" is simply untrue. The only thing on your network are authorized nodes and users. Nothing else.....

  • @trayces8006
    @trayces8006 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Soooo.... weres the beartooth link?

  • @G0TT3RFUNK3N
    @G0TT3RFUNK3N 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Using wifi halow would be best with range of about 3km and mesh networking 802.11ahs is great

  • @cyanidedelirium
    @cyanidedelirium 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The lilygo t-echo meshtastic is the closest thing to plug and play in meshtastic world at $55ish yall can see if it works for you for 100 and then see if you want to upgrade or build your own nodes

  • @jacobperry3528
    @jacobperry3528 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was about to pull the trigger on beartooth but man, that gateway cost 😬. Pairing it with starlink seemed like a dream for my wildland fire crews but it’s gonna have to wait a season.

  • @terryevans1976
    @terryevans1976 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In a SHTF scenario put one up with a tethered balloon. Bring it up and down to change the batteries in the radio etc.

  • @ostrov11
    @ostrov11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Спасибо.

  • @MichaelNyden-r6d
    @MichaelNyden-r6d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We need a 5w beartooth, or cheaper prices so we can buy a third unit and put it upon a balloon or drone for repeating.

  • @ExpeditionOverlanding
    @ExpeditionOverlanding 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    900mhz band is also where cordless phones (remember those?) typically operate. Also, with encrypted radios, my understanding is the FCC requires a business license to operate? Is that not the case with digital radios?

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you are in the ISM bands, like your wifi is, it can be encrypted and used to communicate encrypted content.

  • @brianbejan575
    @brianbejan575 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can someone even buy the silvus radios, and what would the price range be?

  • @nickclayton1935
    @nickclayton1935 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does a getgotak DMR compare?

  • @EliasPergande
    @EliasPergande หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Real world testing of these please 🙏

  • @river1711
    @river1711 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you discussed connecting to LoRa satellites yet?

  • @uh60ce1
    @uh60ce1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So Beartooth and Glock are the standard? That's what I got out of this. Opinions? I'm Brand new to this.

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And IBM Thinkpads.

    • @GWOTalchem
      @GWOTalchem 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glocks yes beartooth no
      Just get a good ham radio and learn the basics if you’re new.
      This if like level 90 shit, if your at level 5 focus on level 5.

    • @uh60ce1
      @uh60ce1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @GWOTalchem firearms definitely not new. Coms yes. Was mainly just saying is Beartooth the Glock of Coms?

    • @GWOTalchem
      @GWOTalchem 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@uh60ce1 no, their isn’t a Glock of Comms honestly. Everything available to consumers is compromising on some level.

    • @ACiDGRiM
      @ACiDGRiM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@T.REXLabsthink pads are chinesium now

  • @budprepper3811
    @budprepper3811 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Beartooth is a no-go at that price

  • @Insectoidoverlords
    @Insectoidoverlords 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is silvus available for private citizens?

    • @T.REXLabs
      @T.REXLabs  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes... private citizens with a decent budget. Also, if you buy radios that run in non ISM-frequencies you will need to show that you have the appropriate FCC license, but they will work with you.

  • @d0hanzibi
    @d0hanzibi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please still do your TRex meshtastic node. That will help grow the project and improve it!