Supreme Court Drops Bombshell Ruling On Electric Vehicles
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
- The Supreme Court’s recent ruling on “Chevron deference” could affect federal regulations of everything from power plant emissions to electric vehicles to transmission lines.
This changes the mandate for the green new deal and electric vehicle mandates. This is a win for consumers to choose their own “independence machines” or vehicles. Now, courts will have more say in interpreting rules on everything from the EPA’s latest effort to curb power plant emissions to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's orders.
The Supreme Court last week overruled Chevron, what that means now, is that it is Congress, it’s the elected members of Congress that have to make policy decisions that impact the American people, not the armies of bureaucrats who have no democratic accountability. Elected officials don’t always make the best decisions, but it’s better than someone saying the new rules are there and too bad for you!
Some of the initial rollbacks include the EPA’s rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants as well as regulations to encourage electric vehicles. There are wide-reaching implications for the oil and gas industry because it will make it more difficult for federal agencies to regulate the industry based on their interpretation of ambiguous laws.
EV regulations are facing massive changes or removal, following this ruling. These regulations could face challenges that might reach the Supreme Court as soon as this Fall. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)’s power plant regulations and broader climate regulations also stand on shaky ground. This shift could significantly impact the push for greener energy solutions in the United States.
The Biden Administration’s strict tailpipe emissions standard has become vulnerable. They have had success watering down EPA tailpipe emissions rules in the past and some of their challenges are still pending and could be subject to the Supreme Court's Chevron decision.
A 26 state coalition filed a legal challenge in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals against the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to block the agency’s new fuel economy requirements for passenger cars and light trucks, which the agency had finalized on June 7th.
Could this be the end of the electric vehicle mandate? The Supreme Court ruling certainly opens the doors for the mandate to be dropped. We are not there yet, we will keep you posted as this unfolds. Subscribe and follow so you don’t miss the updates.
Thanks for watching!
➡️ Looking for more automotive news? Go to our second channel: / @car-smarts
➡️ Buy me a cup of coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/laurenfix
➡️ Listen to the Total Car Score Podcast with Lauren Fix, Karl Brauer, and Javier Mota on all platforms: www.revolverpodcasts.com/show...
➡️ Social media:
Twitter or X: / laurenfix
FB: / lauren.fix.the.car.coach
Instagram: / laurenfix
Gettr: gettr.com/user/laurenfix
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-625957
Gab: gab.com/LaurenFix
Truth Social: truthsocial.com/@laurenfix
Substack: carcoachreports.substack.com/
➡️ Check out our website for more content in English and Spanish: www.CarCoachReports.com
➡️ Free Monthly Newsletter - Auto News, Car Reviews & Saving Secrets: carcoachreports.com
➡️ Get My Book: Lauren Fix's Guide to Loving Your Car: amzn.to/3ifDi3j
Music License: Epidemic Sound
©Automotive Aspects, Inc., 2024. All Rights Reserved.
#supremecourt #car #carreview #chevron #evmandate - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Defund the EPA.
Add the IRS, ATF, FBI, and CIA!!!
Good luck. Even Trump won't do it.
@@jimtincher7357 amen
@@KutWrite Especially the EPA. Under proper leadership, the EPA performs a vital function.
@@samr.england613 Maybe on paper. Right now, it's doing its best to bankrupt us all. Plus, there's no constitutional power for the federal government to do any of that. At best, it's a State function.
Don't you believe in constitutional limits to government power?
Delete the EPA
Nah, then we'll look like china, we don't want that, we just want fair regulations.
So you want to go back to acid rain on a regular basis and smog so thick it can literally kill people? The EPA does not need 'deleted'... they need reigned in.
Bravo to the Supreme Court for making Congress actually do their job and not simply delegating everything to government agencies.
Congress wants to delegate to corporations and other agencies because then it takes the liability off of them when they implement crazy mandates
So you think lawyers are the best people to decide what things will or won't kill you?
Darwinism in action.
@@scytaleghola5969 Stupid take. No, we don't trust lawyers to make these decisions. We expect them to have experts on staff that can relay the information to them (and us) so they can make informed decisions. Stop trying to gaslight people when you know what they mean.
@@scytaleghola5969 Anybody but bureaucrats. Amen.
Child car seats, seat belts, They always force stuff for the Chiiiiildrennnnn...
American citizens cannot be forced to buy things they don't want by anyone, even by other citizens.
Sure they can. The supremes already sang on that one, it's colloquially called Obama Care.
@@xerxes8632 Actually Trump made that not effective. It was a bad decision from the SC and fortunately the forced part was removed or it would be over 2k my family would’ve had to pay to NOT have Obamacare. It’s the first thing that made me appreciate Trump as President.
@@xerxes8632 You are right... they sure can force, it is better said that no one has a right to force this.
Obama forced us to buy healthcare insurance or face a $800 tax. This despite the fact that the federal government has no authority to do so per the US Constitution.
What about digital TVs we were forced to buy (from China). And what ever happened to incandescent bulbs (LED bulbs from China). And now EVs and electric appliances from, guess where?
It's not a free market when we have a government telling consumers & business what they can and can not buy & sell. Praise the Lord! We need less regulation!
@@mrjim1973 fascism. Govn't control companies.
The government still can and does force us to do what it wants, but at least it will be by elected officials who can be held accountable and not some untouchable agency.
When did we have a free market? I watched Bush live, telling us that we were going to have a consumer economy, and to just get used to it! This was while America was hemorrhaging it's industry and those that decided our economy are the ones profiting. Free market is and has been a fantasy.
I don’t fully agree. I don’t think we necessarily need *less* regulation, because good/appropriate regulations protect people from getting screwed/hurt in some way by companies and corporations (for example). However, we do need *appropriate* regulations, because by the same token, bad/inappropriate regulations can be used by unfair or corrupt bureaucracies to harm people or treat certain groups unfairly compared to other groups.
@@michaeletzel4877 The main regulation I would like to see is one where any company that gets so big that it holds more than 30 - 40% of any given market share gets broken up.
No decision like an EV Mandate should ever be done without a vote of the people.
Commiefornia Democrat rulers passed the EV mandate. That mandate then became law in every state who passed laws tying their rules to CA. MD did this DUI the rulers don't have to take responsibility for the mandate. The MGA will never repeal thre tie to CA.
No in a communist country like the USA. The communists apparently can even get away with murder; it is called abortion.
Oh but, in California if the people are called upon to vote out an EV mandate, and such a vote actually happened, the proponents of the EV mandate would quickly rush to a superior state court, with a favorable judge, and block the election results on some technical grounds. That's how the party that worries about "democracy" actually shows you how much they care what the people do with their vote. That's Newsom's and Pelosi's party!
If you want one buy one. I don’t & I won’t!
The government cannot force a product to be purchased, or at least it used to be that way before a certain president passed a “health care bill”.
Hooray! Mandates are dictatorial, not American.
Depends. Seat Belts are mandates, but there are impact results show proof. Show me the money/proof!
SCOTUS IS VERY WELL AWARE OF THE CRITICAL CONCERN OF THE FUTURE AGENDA CREATED NAFARIOSLY!!!
@@kentakayanagi2084yeah maybe but how many people still don't buckle up unless they get caught speeding. The manufactures had the best seatbelt when you got in the car the seatbelt came around and in place. It was the competition that hated them the most I thought it was a good idea. Way to go Toyota and Honda both had them. It's funny that air bags still need seat belts to be worn. 73
American is dictatorship regime. Always was.
Mandates are taxes ultimately passed on to the poor.
Imagine that, Congress will have to spell things out in bills and be held more accountable for the misery that comes out of DC
They'll just put their most unpopular bills attached to stuff they know will pass.
No dual citizenship. Pick a country.
@@fench1234567 They do that now. That's where most of this forced social engineering crap comes from now.
Congress or the Senate taking accountability for anything will never happen. They will pick a few people and shift all the blame on them like they always do.
Censored again.
All that "green energy" stuff was only about power and control.
A SCAM!
@@doublem6027I agree, it's worse than the Bernie Madoff scam,that scam didn't affect the entire country this Green Energy Scam does,it has caused the cost of gas,electricity, food and everything else to go up in price, with prices rising faster than wages and salaries, everyone,except for illegal aliens are worse off than they were four years ago,all in an effort to take away the American peoples right to choose what they want to drive and force them to buy and drive electric cars they didn't ask for or want,if you want an electric car you should have the right to buy one,but there should be no subsidies involved, to force people to buy an ev when they really don't want one, imo is tyrannical.
All about the corrupt money.
Boondoggle
All governments are about power and control and NEVER about the ordinary people. Except China and Singapore.
The lack of EV sales dictated that one. Great news.
I guess that's why the Tesla Model Y has been the best selling auto globally for some time now.
@@GregTeston I'm just looking at usa. Edmunds says - "The Ford F-150's offers the best attributes of a modern pickup: power, efficiency, comfort and capability. Add to that a huge range of configurations and options, and you've got the best-selling vehicle in America for 2023"
@aleb5195 did you see that video where a Ford f150 was towing a disabled tesla cybetruck? I was DED
@@aleb5195 In that case, the Tesla Model Y is #5 over all in the US. Still completely goes against what the above person said regarding "lack of EV sales". That's the point I was trying to make.
@@NegativeNanase I will have to look for it! Thanks! I just bought a honda ridgeline. No ev for me!
Finally, Congress will have to do what they were elected to do and take responsibility.
But they won't. And this will lead to more than the usual chaos. The US is becoming more and more ungovernable. And while that might feel good in the short run, it will inevitably cause more misery. Thanks court..
@@Tom-dt4ic the biggest mistake a citizen of USA can make is to believe that you don't have to fight incompetence and evil, "now and then". Life has always been a struggle, historically and any good times we experience is only temporary unless good men are willing to fight for what is right and moral. Evil only respects force/fight, Thomas Jefferson's qoute is as true today as it was back then, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure." Freedom isn't preserved by "they", this is a coward's way of thinking it is preserved by "us/me".
@@Tom-dt4ic WRONG
Finally they WILL BE ABLE to do what they are elected to do. When the bureaucracies ( AKA the deep state or the swamp) were given power to make law congress became impotent.
@@soakupthesunman Commies hate freedom. They don't believe the peasants are capable of making their own decisions on vehicles or guns.
I have nothing against EV's but to pretend they are some green unicorn is laughable.
Nope, but you are obviously completely clueless what you are talking about. They are not only much more environmentally friendly and sustainable, they save 70 percent energy compared to an ICE car, this alone would end the discussion, despite there are lots of more reasons why EVs are great and definitely the future, while ICE cars will go the steam engine way... into the museum.
EVs have their place, and if a person want to buy them that's great, but it's definitely not the right choice for every person, every task, or every area. I think that's the big issue people have with an EV mandate is they want a choice.
@@chriswilliams8607 I'm wrong and you are correct. Thank you for calling me out.
@chriswilliams8607 Lol you have no clue. The environmental impact the mining for materials has proves you're wrong. The materials mostly come from China and other countries that use child slave labor to obtain the materials. To say they are friendly in any context is laughable. You're not a very well informed person on this topic.
@@Drewsterman777 Winner winner. They think drilling for oil is a sin but massive strip mines are green .
Now, end all green subsidies.
And oil and coal subsidies too.
@jjackson3240 The oil and coal subsidies only exist to power EV'S. End EV subsidies and the rest follows.
@@jonwoodworker So sad that you believe that. Buh bye.
@@jjackson3240 Yes, I believe the truth. Just like EV sales, buh by!
@@jjackson3240 Ironically the only subsidies they get are for green energy investments. So they're still green subsidies. Oil companies are as willing to take those handouts as anyone.
"0" mandates
Call them what they are...Dictates.
Finally something reasonable!.
Shouldn't be any mandate at all. If EV's were so great new car buyers would choose an EV instead of the ICE.
Yeah, but since ev's are such a piece-of-sh, no one wants them, unless wannabe socialist dictator Biden regime, tries to "mandate" that we buy that cr&p!
WE THE PEOPLE do not want ev's
@@BamaNewYorker Seeing as how you focus on one vehicle instead of the classes of vehicles (ICEs vs EVs) because you'd lose that argument.
If EV doesn't have solar panels, it's a golf cart.
@@michaelmorrow3679 Mostly coal fired until then.
@@michaelmorrow3679well I own a really great golf cart that does 0 to 60 in under 2 seconds. Most comfortable cart I've ever drove
@@BamaNewYorkeryeah, and 90% of them wished they hadn't, buyer's remorse!
This had to be done. These unelected Bureaucrats have no right to put regulations on Anyone. Our institutions need to be purged of these huge wastes of money. Go back to our system of a government by the people . These issues should be a matter for our Elected representitives.
the System of Government OF the People is called a Constitutional Republic, a Democratic society is what we have now and the Government runs the people we have allowed the Elected officials far to much power because we became lazy and allowed them to have that power over us. America is a Constitutional Republic and we need to remove all of the power from the Elected and give it back to the PEOPLE. STOP watching TV all day long and pay attention to what is going on in this country, Stand up and tell them NO when they go against what is right and against the constitution, in fact EVERYONE needs to Read our constitution so we all know what is allowed and what is NOT allowed. you can pick up the little pocket size constitution and take it with you, read it while on break at work, on the bus, train ? on your way to work, instead of listening to the Garbage on that TV read the Constitution for your self don't let the Elected ones that have NEVER Read it tell you what they think it says, you will know for yourself what it says. carry it with you and when you hear the lies come out the politician mouth look it up see if it's legal.
Millions of fire fighters and their families applauded the Supreme Court for their common sense
You have a higher risk of a gas car catching fire than an ev.
@@kevinshaw7755 EV fires despite being more rare, are substantially more serious, metal fires being nearly impossible to put out, and much more toxic, with higher temperatures flame retardant materials like PTFE become HF and refrigerant becomes all manner of poisonous gases.
@@kevinshaw7755has fires are relatively easier to handle and fight.
Electric fires are significantly more difficult to handle.
Unless you know better than the people who actually fight fires.
Our house was destroyed in 2021 by a fire. We got out in time but watched as a bedroom window exploded and melted down the side of the house because of the small battery in a laptop. Never parked my hybrid in the garage again after that. Can’t even imagine what it would look like if a battery as big as an ev was burning. Not even a comparison to a regular car fire. Regular cars do not usually spontaneously catch fire parked and shut off in a garage at night either.
I agree , but sadly the FFU supports this admin right alone with the UAW .
So wise , Thank You . As far as I am concerned There should be NO ev Mandates , NO mpg Mandates and NO Joe Biden. Trump 2024
Totally agree!!!!!!!!!!
Now if we could get the kill switch mandate repealed.
Agreed! I know this is one of the reasons why I will not be rushing out to buy a new car.
Unchecked power of Government can only end badly. Checks and Balances exist to prevent absolute power from corrupting absolutely, like we have now.
@martinmdl6879 And outlaw lobbying !!!!!!
That’s great , EVs are clearly the biggest con in the last hundred years.
If an EV suits someones use case , by all means they have the choice , EVs currently are in many cases not a good replacement for internal combustion engined vehicle , and this is fact.
EVs by their very design as soon as you take them out of their ideal operating environment, their many handicaps come to the surface .
You have no clue what you are talking about.
What about the massive subsidies given to fossil fuel companies. Fossil fuel companies last year received 20 billion dollars explicit subsidy and an implicit subsidy of 660 billion dollars. In US 50,000 sq miles of agricultural land is used to grow corn to make ethanol to be blended with gasoline only, not diesel. Huge subsidies are given to grow this corn, and subsidies to refineries to extract ethanol out of corn. What a total waste of tax payers money. This useless subsidy is given yearly for multiple decades. If you remove these subsides given to fossil fuels, I am ok to remove subsidies given to EVs. Because of these subsidies gasoline price is kept artificially low, otherwise gasoline would cost 6 dollars a gallon.
@@ramb5193 absolutely correct, people always come up with story about subsidies, despite the fact that nuclear, coal, oil all gets tons and tons and tons of taxpayer money.
@@ramb5193A bit confused because you compared power source subsidies with EV subsidies. EVs are mostly powered from fossil fuels, because that's where most of our electricity comes from. Agree about ethanol, though, that is a waste.
@@johng4093 in US, nuclear and renewables provide 40% of electricity, coal 16% and rest natural gas. Not much coming from petrol or diesel. Stop the subsidy on fossil fuel, then you will know the real cost of gasoline and diesel. This will help people to move to renewables. If cost of electricity from natural gas goes up, people will move to renewables. Almost 80-90% of new power plants are coming from renewables as they are much cheaper. Fossil fuel subsidies are enormous and they are being give out every year for the last 60 years, and they must be stopped. Few years from now EVs will be cheaper than equivalent ICE cars,maven without rebates.
The best way to get rid of EV mandates is to repeal the CAFE act. (Corporate Average Fuel Economy).
The Supreme Court finally bowed to Common Sense
evs are dead--- no one wants them
Wrong California loves garbage EVs
Not what sales numbers are showing.
@@qrzone8167ok, I did that and all sites say the same, SLUMPING sales…
Potato boy!
I have no idea what happened to common sense?
Commie-crats destroyed it !
Common Sense does have a problem.
Sometimes what you thought was common sense, isn’t as common as you thought it was.
It went out the door with common courtesy.
The USSC is helping revive it
@@y2k4ed it went out the door with this current Administration!
I'm not against electric vehicles, but there's no way they should be mandated. Currently, the battery limitations and power grid capacity are problems that will need to be solved before EVs are viable.
@@phoschnizzle826 did you see the new bill for deploying more nuclear reactors to help with the energy demands? Evs were included in that demand. Guess windmills and solar panels weren't cutting it.
@@tomc8157 True, but those are years down the road, and the inherent problems with current battery technology (slow to charge, poor cold weather performance, toxic / fire hazards on failure) aren't yet solved. A decent hybrid solution would be a better choice currently than a straight EV.
@@tomc8157 Solar isn't the issue, it's the batteries. Battery technology is so far behind everything else. For perspective, I can buy 7.5KW of solar panels, for $1250, for the racking wire, and inverter we can round it up to $2500. It's hilariously cheap, and 7.5kw hours is hilariously overkill for most homes. However, you need batteries to make solar actually useful, and when we add decent battery capacity into the equation, suddenly the price jumps to $7500-$10k in just materials alone
And the power grid will NEVER handle generating such enormous amounts of energy, without burning HUGE amounts of fossil fuels, and spending hundreds of trillions, on network upgrades--which ain't NEVER happening, btw!!!!
The only way to change the federal government is (1) limit their budgets (2) limit borrowing to zero (3) follow the constitution where the federal government can only do what's listed as responsibilities in the constitution (4) cumulative term limits for congress/senate and federal bureaucrat's (5) life-time ban on elected officials and federal bureaucrat's working for companies that do business with the federal government.
Yes.
Maybe actually enforce insider trading?
I think DJT just promised to end the revolving door between Government alphabet agencies & the regulated industries
That's a very good short list of actions which should be taken.. I believe of all the dreaded, unforeseen "unintended consequences" that have befell mankind not just the US citizenry has been the "commerce clause" of the US Constitution, and it's misinterpretation. It's intent I believe is clear to anyone with good sense, yet that one clause has been used/misused to to allow the Federal government, and the Hellish bureaucracy to assert their will, diminish the standard of living, and destroy lives..
@@hauntedmoodylady Possibly but they still need the other limits as I outlined. Unfortunately, my list and the commerce clause change require amending the constitution which isn't easy.
The Supreme Court rocks.
Gave Us Back Our Right To Choose,
If someone wants to buy an EV, fine, but I don't want one. I shouldn't be forced to.
Return of Small trucks
I drove a 1979 Toyota Hi-Lux for 20 years and have now driven a 2003 Tacoma for the last (almost) 21 years. They are fabulous small trucks, reliable, low maintenance, and almost no repairs needed. Before the 1979 Toyota, I bought a new 1980 Mustang and had NOTHING but trouble with it - so glad I traded it in on that Toyota!
Yes, please!
@@user-dt3sq7rw3b I have a 2005 Toyota Tacoma, and that's the best vehicle I've ever owned.
they don't get any better mileage than Big trucks do, they are just easier to park at the grocery store
No electric car will ever sully my driveway. They're not only bad for the environment, they're downright dangerous; a faulty battery can go up in unquenchable flames very quickly. They're also unsuited to the average driver, since the only thing that lives up to their ads is their insanely high acceleration, but they don't go far and they always need charging. Which isn't at all easy or convenient, as the unlucky buyers of EVs have found to their sorrow. Besides, the electric grid struggles just to provide power to businesses & homes, there's nothing left over to charge EVs!
We don't want ELECTRIC CARS!
you mean u dont want electric cars some of us do. but we all should have the choice
Idiotic response, love e cars. Saved tons of $ and time, garage is my free power station.
They have their place. They’re REALLY fast, silent and offer the convenience of skipping the gas station. I just drove the Ford f150 ev. 0-60 in 3. Not good for the full country set, or oil field rough work. But for contractors in town it’s not the worst choice.more cargo space that a comparable truck.
@@GORT70 i have a lightning and a contractor. its the best truck i have owned
@@zman4444 LOLOLOL fill your boots, sweety. Don't expect help from normal people when you find yourself stranded.
OMG, the Supreme Court is "killing it" lately. I feel like we're getting our country back!!!
Isn't it GREAT!! It's about time for some pushback on the out of control insane Federal Government!!
Trump appointed justices that interpret the constitution based on the constitution, and not on the justices feelings.
At last, some common sense from America. Unfortunately, Europeans don't have ANY legal authority on the side of fairness for the people. The only law in the EU mandates only for decisions made by unelected bureaucrats - the UK law has also been co-opted to enforce decisions made by unelected bodies, such as the EU, ECHR, UN, WHO, IPCC & WEF. It's a travesty for the SOVEREIGN people that successive governments have, illegally, mandated away the rights of the people...
@johngalt5411 At long, long, long last !!!!!!
All except one crazy woman.
That noise in the background is 1 million firefighters cheering.
@@DCGreenZone i agree with you, but i did see a cybertruck parked in the employee parking lot of my local firehouse. Status symbols are still easy to market apparently.
Great news! I’ll NEVER buy an electric car!
And you should not buy one if they do not fit your lifestyle. Please tell us you did not vote for the idiot in the WH that mandated this.
Maybe you will when it makes sense. Right now it doesn't.
I won’t say that I never will, I just know I will not until it makes far more sense. When I can get 5-700 miles on a charge and charge in less than a few hours I will gladly buy. Right now for my lifestyle an EV makes NO sense, I would get stranded far too often.
Can you remember gas lines! I remember them twice. When they had gas wars and it got as low as 12 cents, and during the oil embargo under jimmy carter. When I think electric cars I think long lines and fights.
@@jerrysedars8097 LOL. I bought a Chevrolet Volt, a PHEV, in 2014, and updated to a second one in 2017. I retired at 59.5 years old because I saved tens of thousands of dollars from buying gasoline. Worked for me.
as an auto mechanic i can say that the EPA has made cars so unreliable, complex, and expensive to buy and repair. they have authority and no accountability. cars back in the 60's were more reliable.
Cars back in the 1960 spit out Pb. Should we go back to putting heavy metal in the air we breath?
@@waywardgeologist2520 that sure is a stupid remark.
@waywardgeologist2520 yes!!!!
And not only were 60's cars more reliable,but much easier to repair, and much less costly, too! What a shame thst we have to listen to sh*tty-f^cking environmentalists, and their garbage agenda!!! I'm all for "smokestack heaven", again--with lots of jobs & industry & prosperity, again!!!!!!
Yes, back to the 60's, with reliable car, and have you breathe all the Pb, that I can generate, yes!!! The h*ll with environmentalists and let's have lots of smokestacks, spewing out prosperity and good jobs, again!!! And, have simple, affordable, easy-to-fix cars, too! Pollution control systems SUCK!!!! Get rid of them, and the EPA, too--and make Sierra Club ILLEGAL!!! Yes!!!!
Power to the People.
Right on!
This is fantastic! It's great to FINALLY see some pushback against the out-of-control federal government!!
Great Video on this! Thanks for this!
The real push back will come this fall, vote right or loose it all, TRUMP 2024
Yay! We need way less regulations and government spending and agencies.
All over the world the word 'mandate' is becoming very scary.
Mandate is a Communist word for you will do as I say. you do not have FREEDOM to choose.
CA will ignore this. The rulers in CA are sick of being stuck in traffic behind the help. EV mandates are meant to eliminate over 80% of all cars on the road.
The car makers should just boycott CA. Let's see how much fun they'll have walking everywhere.
@@fishgutz4272 Democrats ignore every law they don’t like and instigate lawfare on those that don’t agree with ideas they have that they can’t impose legally.
I hope this will reverse CA’s mandate. I want choice, not dictatorial mandates.
I live here, tell me about it. Anybody has to be better than Newsome!
California needs to be given back to Mexico.
Hallelujah. Thank you Jesus.
So it means Congress actually has to work? To actually DO the JOB they were elected to DO? Perish the thought!!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬
We want V8s! No one wants EVs!
For certain applications, I agree on the V8s. But really we just want simplicity and longevity, rather than tons of complexity to meet arbitrary regulatory requirements.
@@jayce_147 I’d buy a cardboard box on wheels if Chevy would put a v8 in it 💪🏼
@Jayce-147 there are still some V8 powered cars left Cadillac Blackwing super sedans Mercedes Benz S Class & SL roadster/cabriolet Lexus LC and LS etc. though the base engine in a Lexus LS is 3.5 L or 215 Cubic in V6 sure when I was younger you could get a V6 in a Chevrolet Impala or Mercury Grand Marquis though most people opted for the V8 engine options that were available from a 5 L 305 to 6.9 L 425 the most common V8 was a 5.7 L or 350 cubic in depending on which trim level you got and what options you chose such as Sun Roof bench seat/bucket seats in the front tinted windows etc.
@@courtneypuzzo2502 I agree but not a lot of people can afford a BLACKWING.
@@asajayunknown6290 Yes! Simplicity and reliability. Most automakers are being forced into turbo charging engines to meet the emissions mandates. Turbos are notably less reliable with a shorter engine life. I've owned turbos and I like them... but don't force them on people. Same for EV's.
FINALLY! Someone that gets to the point right off the bat. Thank you.
I get more than 34.5 miles per gallon with all my vehicles. 36+ mpg in my car and both my motorcycles get well over 45 mpg. I will NOT buy an electric vehicle built with today's technology. The range, charging times and battery longevity all need major improvement.
With the absurd expense of it ill be waiting too. We could have a model with newer technology come right around the corner and everyone will be cursing themselves for getting one today.. It is still a pretty new technology.. The DVD to this VHS may be next year.
the evil EPA even made dirt bikes illegal. I hate them.
FJB!
Trump will get rid of it any way.
All regulations not based directly on clear law are automatically null and void.
Under the law of the land
We are America please don't fall in European countries as theses countries don't have gasoline and natural gas. Understanding is we don't need ev in America. 🎉🎉
We don't need (or want) them gere in Europe either. 🇬🇧
They do have or use them, they just also use a lot more nuclear power.
How stupid can one be to still do not understand that fossile ressources are finite and will be gone in 50 to 100 years, and even today effort for oil production ist constantly rising and requiring more and more energy. It requires a certain level of stupidity to act against EVs, as they save 70 percent energy, and can be charged by sun or wind.
Electric cars SUCK 100%
Except they really don't
@Cttechexpress The sure as hell do. They have limited range. I love watching electric car owners waiting in line at Target to get enough juice to make it home. Gas cars don't combust in your garage and burn your house down. Driving across the country is no problem in a gas-powered car. When the batteries go bad on an electric car it becomes virtually worthless because the battery packs are unaffordable. The batteries are known for failing to start a car when it's freezing. They put a strain on the power grid because the grid can't handle it. California is now asking owners to stagger their charging schedule, lol. How can you be so ignorant?
@joevarga5982 you have no idea what you're talking about. They work great in the cold. Over 90% of vehicles sold in Norway are now electric. What you've heard otherwise is misinformation spread by anti-EV propagandists grossly exaggerating winter challenges. Likewise with charging times, 95% of EV owners just charge in their garage and spend zero time at a public charging station most of the time. Anyone who actually owns one could tell you these things, along with how they're vastly cheaper to operate, practically maintenance free, tons of storage space and features impossible with an ICE car, recording all around the car at all times, fully autonomous driving capability, the safest vehicles in the world... the list of reasons they're better go on and on.
@@Aegisx5 See the videos
"Electric vehicle drivers stranded because of cold-weather charging problems",
"Extreme cold putting a chill on electric vehicles winter battery life", and
"Freezing weather leaves DOZENS of DEAD EVs stranded"
and get educated.
@joevarga5982 multiple propaganda media outlets covering the same stupid story. Yeah you have to warm it up before DC fast charging when it's -20F. That's not normal. It's a complete non-issue for anyone who plugs their vehicle in at night to even a 120v standard outlet in those kinds of extreme colds. Ever heard of diesel and engine warmers? I mean normally you probably know the media is full of crap, but now you buy everything they tell you for some reason.
Hurray!!!
YEAH!!!!!
Oh Thank GOD! Now let’s hope this will let car manufacturing for ICE vehicles be put back in place so we can save our industry.
Finally, the EV joke comes to an end! 👍
Election time
WIN RED NOW!!!!
The Chevron, extends to arms, as well (2nd. Amendment). I didn't realize that it was so broad in its power. Interesting. Thanks for the report👍🏻
Congress passed a law to give guns back to many veterans and the VA said WE WILL NOT FOLLOW IT!
Get rid of the EPA…
Has the Country gotten any better since the inception of all these "agencies"; if not, do away with them and save taxpayers some money!
Our representatives have been using this doctrine to avoid accountability for bad outcomes the public doesn’t like. “That was that agency - not me. Re-elect me & I’ll fix it!” Both parties play this game. Also, our Reps know big government know-it-alls run these agencies.
Bingo!
Simple solution: get rid of these agencies!
Here come the V8 motors!
Awesome! Thank you for the clear, concise summary of the SCOTUS's decision, Lauren!
Don't you just love the Democraps?
Thank you Lauren.
This is great news!
The EPA should have never been involved w how many mpg that cars get. That should be left to the manufacturers!
When I was looking at the Chevron decision my first thought was the members of Congress (both House and Senate) must be terrified that they might have to do some real work exercising due diligence in looking deeper into these items to fill in details they previously let the President's staff take care of. Where will they find time to campaign and raise money for the next election cycle?
Looking at what bills Congress has passed lately I'm not looking forward to seeing how they address this.
Great news. Thank you
What, they’re not going to force us to buy a product that we don’t want?
They are already putting bugs in your food.
Hertz did an outstanding job of making sure I'm never convinced to buy an EV... At least, not without massive improvements to battery technology, energy production, and fast charging capacity. They gave us a non Tesla EV as a rental, which wasn't charged when we got it, was incompatible with fast charging stations, and spent 30 hours on other charging stations during the 5 days we had the car. Also, a 220 mile range is a joke as a rental! I'll stick with my wholly owned Prius V!
It's about f'n time
Well, that's one way for rulemakers and legislators to get out of the corner they have painted themselves into. Yes, I think EV mandates are government overreach AND also morally questionable (strip mining in third-world countries etc) plus not fit for the stated purpose of "saving the planet".
Fantastic
Free markets set the rules.
Congress doesn't make policy - they make LAW.
If EV's are going to be the lion share of the market - it should be because they out-perform petrol vehicles and people want them.
There is no free market when conglomerates control industries. In Europe, you can have 40 companies in mobile or internet to choose from. What do we have here? Five or six.
We’ve been here before and each time there are conglomerates, our economy goes down the sewer. Reference the Great Depression started when Hoover, a free marketer was president and took away controls on banks and corporations.
Europe learned its lesson a hundred years ago when fascism destroyed the world. They now heavily regulate banks, corporations, have strong unions, universal health care, free education to stay competitive, and a strong sense of the common welfare of their people. Why do you think the right wingers got voted out in England and France. Brexit is one good example, a history of right wing fascism is another.
This will definitely snowball into everything else. Any of these alphabet letters organizations like the FDA and FMCSA will be affected.
Our government has run amuck on regulations. You have to have a law degree to understand the fishing regs.
Can we now get back to making hot hatches again🤷♂️
I love EVs. I own a Tesla myself, but I don’t think they should be forced onto people. We should have the freedom to buy what we want.
Why do so many people speak of EVs being _mandated?_ The agencies were only phasing in limits on pollution levels that control the kind of vehicles that can NOT be sold. If automakers can make practical compressed-air powered vehicles, or wind-up-rubberband vehicles that stay below the prescribed limits, great!
If you want to say, "but since everyone _knows_ that electric vehicles are the only practical way to meet the required emission limits, the regulations are indeed mandates", my answer would be, "about time you acknowledged that." Stop belaboring the indignation over government interference, and address the question of whether or not failing to curb the pollution will incur massive costs.
@@levenkay4468 The bar is so high that ICE cars will be effectively outlawed. While the EVs are also causing CO2 emissions - just not where they drive. As you should well know...
@@Michael-jx9bh What I _know_ is that while petroleum-fueled ICE is far, far into the "diminishing returns" end of its development as far as emissions go, electrical generation is rapidly becoming cleaner. And even if EVs _didn't_ pollute less overall, why wouldn't a mere relocation of the pollution away from the bulk population still be a good thing?
Nobody should finance EVs, abortions, or any other liberal belief.
@@levenkay4468 -- What are you talking about? 12 states have now MANDATED that ICE vehicles cannot be sold in their state after 2035.
TPMS next. Such a time and money suck for fleet companies. We survived a century by, I don't know, checking tires with analog tools and vision.
Come into the present ,TPMS are cheap and work great.
They save lives.
@@bobbybishop5662 times 4000 wheels on a fleet of 1000
@@thereissomecoolstuff And so do seatbelts.... the majority of the time. From personal experience I have dealt with the fallout from the one off. Normies expect some tech to tell of a problem but never walk around their car to look for potential problems.
@@bobbybishop5662 in a scale of a car or two, yes. Thousands of cars & trucks the cost gets passed on to consumers if a corporation and tax payers if a government fleet. Service providers like myself spend time chasing tpms and emissions fault codes and that is resources not spent on maintaining meaningful repairs not dead watch batteries.
Trying to force rubbish vehicles down our throats didn't work out for the most part , those falling for it dwindled away , showing that the majority of people weren't stupid and don't want the trashy , dangerous, aggravating things.
This is amazing news indeed!!! Next we need to make sure only one law at a time passes by Congress, no more omnibus law packages
EV's are to darn expensive in every category. Non affordable to the general public/worker.
Now watch how fast the free market buries the EV industry. High efficiency hybrids are what should be the focus. Small steps.
No mandates of any kind, we do not need to be told what to do. That works also for the media, we want the news not their opinions.
Europe should do the same. Good luck with that..!
The vote of the people manifests through having better choices. If an EV is a better product for someone's needs then I'm sure they'll buy it. Right now the majority of EVs are lifestyle vehicles costing far more in their production carbon footprint, and actual cost to buy.
Does this mean that we’ll be able to buy dishwashers that don’t take almost 4 hours to do a load of dishes or washing machines that actually use enough water to clean our clothes?
The public are speaking, that's all i can say
There is …NOTHING GREEN ABOUT GOING GREEN……only the money it makes for the elites…..
@@blackpine6693 🎯
Great job presenting the facts. Thank you.
Still not far enough. Accountability will require Congress to officially take its job back from the Office of the President and its agencies who have set all manner of absurd precedents that are destroying the US economy, likely by design.
California has EVs and they could not keep up charging the EVs . That is 🤣🤣🤣. Newsom is the worst Governor ever.
You know it sounds like everyone the EPA hit with these ridiculous fines for modifying private property should sue for their money back
Yup. This upends their scam. Took long enough.
The various agencies have been filled with ideologs who are unable to think through what their regulations would actually do. We've had mandates to close power plants across the nation, stop energy production and build unreliable and unsustainable 'alternative' energy systems. The alternative systems have a large list of detrimental impacts that come with them but those are ignored. They block hydro and nuclear power facilities so meeting existing power demands becomes tenuous never mind meeting future demands. Then they demand switching to electric vehicles without the infrastructure to support their use. Then they want houses to switch to all electric systems too....and which bag of magic fairy dust will they use to accommodate that increased demand in electricity!?
What a decision for freedom and Support for adherence to the Constitution. This would have never happened without Conservative Judges being in the Majority. It is really nice to hear some Good News for a change and the Curb of Governments power.
Good to see there are still women who have the balls to push back on the bs in this world.
“Honey, I’m going to take the EV to the feed store… be back in 8 hours, if It isn’t too cold to charge the car.”
It is normal for a government to mandate things regarding many things… but the cost, the practicality and the impact on people needed to be considered carefully. They shouldn’t shove it down our throats. They aren’t even considering the folks that live in rural areas, in the interior of the country.