Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey | The God Complex | Film Analysis
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- "I will say that the God concept is at the heart of 2001 but not any traditional, anthropomorphic image of God," so said master filmmaker Stanley Kubrick about his breakthrough movie 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The imagery throughout the film strongly suggests the monolith is the working of God, providing a guiding hand in human evolution. At the same time, the film itself is the work of human hands, where Kubrick is essentially God. He constructs the world the viewer sees, decides what to show and what not, and how it ends, both wonderful and strange. Much like the monolith itself, Kubrick through his choices leaves it up to the viewer to make out precisely what has happened.
*SPOILERS*
This video contains spoilers from Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey
This episode was narrated and produced by Geoffrey Ciani (aka - Rummy).
This episode was written by Christian Twiste and Geoffrey Ciani.
To read more by Christian Twiste please visit his blog:
confessionsofa...
Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey | The God Complex Explained | Film Analysis Breakdown | Movie Review
#2001 #2001ASpaceOdyssey #stanleykubrick
This video is a gift. A commentary about one of my all time favorite movies from one of my all time favorite reviewers (based on your amazing Twin Peaks videos). And I could listen to your voice for hours. In fact, I HAVE listened to your voice for hours. Thank you sir! ❤
Thank you very much for your kind and generous long time support. Most appreciated!
2001 has been what I've considered my favorite film for more than 30 years now dating back to when I was in high school. But even before that, I remember first watching it as a 10 year old with my father, and even back then, despite the fact I couldn't understand exactly what I was watching, I knew it was something special and different.
2001 (and The Elephant Man) were two films from my childhood that I always considered among my very favorites. I watched both when I was 10 years old or so, and these two favorites of mine were unlike any other movie I loved from my childhood.
Thank you again! Cheers!
@@WowLynchWowsame. This movie is timeless.its still interesting to hear different perspectives on the meanings behind different scenes. I enjoyed listening to your video
2001 a breakthrough? No no, it is a peak, a culmination of a filmmakers career.
Fair enough. I do not disagree with that, and I am a fan of all of Stanley's earlier work. At the sane time, I do feel 2001 is the tangible point in time where Stanley elevated his filmmaking prowess to new heights. Cheers!
I think you’ve reached the next stage of *your* evolution, my man.
Thank you very much, appreciate that!
@@WowLynchWowHow do we support you? Can’t find you on Patreon, Kofi, etc.
i'm an avid fan from your lynch videos and i can't get enough film explication and analysis. thanks for the great video
What a surprising and great presentation from one of the premier film analysts I've ever had the pleasure to discover. Thank you so much for sharing your interpretation of this magnificent film.
Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you very much for watching and sharing.
I first and just recently learned of your analysis of 2001: A Space Odyssey from a WordPress article. Thank you for sharing many more reasons why this film continues to stimulate our imaginations over time.
18:55 Your discussion of the lack of emotion shown by the humans about Discovery reminds me that the only time we see Bowman show any kind of emotional stress is when he is “killing” HAL and asks him to sing the song “Daisy.”
Thought provoking Rummy. A few wrinkles I’d never considered. The silence of the humans vs the apes screams. Rebirth and consciousness. Thanks for taking the time.
what a great analysis of a movie that always seemed not to be analysed by any means - thanks a lot!
The Dawn of Man scene still gets me with the cheetah attack.
Wow WLW Wow! I needed this today. Things have seemed unusually dreary lately , and I needed a reminder to mindfully live and participate in all my experiences--as we all do. This is also really lovely reading of 2001. *And* we got a quote from Spinoza! Thank you!!
Well done, sir! I have just turned 65. As a Sci-Fi geek(dare I use that word?) I never experienced the full scope of 2001 on the big screen, though had I done so, my young mind may have thought it as garbage, only much later in life did I see for myself the grand scope of Kubrick and his masterpeice! It is, in my opinion, in my top 5 of sci-fi, but typing that is too easy, and trying to explain 2001 to friends and family have fallen on deaf ears, who won't, or, can't understand why this movie is much more than that. I enjoyed the video very much, and I have seen a few of these videos from other sources, and yours, is the best, thought-out and mind blowing as is the "jump-cut" in the film. Thanks again!!!
Thank you very much for the kind words. Most appreciated. Cheers!
Great work Rummy. Love your range and choice of this film. Another angle on this, looking at it as a product of its time in the late '60s, is the Cold War/nuclear tension. Humanity created a tool, HAL, that they thought was entirely in their control. But of course, they didn't fully understand, or we were able to contain it. The video at the end of the HAL shutdown is Dr. Floyd explaining how they instructed HAL to conceal the true nature of their mission until reaching Jupiter. Much like the paperclip maximizer problem, an AI given a narrow set of goals is theorized to throw everything else out to achieve that goal, even humanity itself. AI can be seen as the stand-in for the nuclear standoff rapidly escalating and humanity's potential to hoist itself on its own petard, even accidentally.
Excellent points and observations! Thanks for watching, and thanks for sharing!
I found your view similar to mine. Also, your analysis is highly enlightening. Cannot wait to hear more from you. Keep up with your magnificent job. Cheers from Argentina 🇦🇷
One of my favorite movies as well. You're on a roll lately dude. Just like Quasimodo predicted.
“Open the pod bay doors, HAL.”
Absolute PERFECTION!!! Some of the greatest minimalist acting EVER. You can see the rise of Bowen’s anger and frustration immediately pacified by his realization that it is illogical and futile to be mad at this “Tool”, no matter how advanced it may be. Great video!! I love the little Twin Peaks and Lynch references throughout. 🏔🦉🏔
I'm waiting like patience on a monument for quality analyses of the greatest movies and series of all time to be handed out!
Old man Profaci knew how to keep the podbay doors closed for his enemies.
Thank you for these clear and detailed studies, you deserve a lot more subscribers!
Wow Ciani/Twiste Wow! An analysis of 2001 worthy of the movie! I first saw 2001 the week it was released when I was 17. I am 70 years old now and your video added yet another lens through which I have deeply enjoyed the story and production of 2001.
Thank you very much for sharing that, Tom. Appreciate it!
Very good synopsis, Sir.
Honestly, I've watched this film and it was one of those times I heard but didn't LISTEN to the full context. It's rare but this was one of those and I thank you.
Wow you are on a roll lately! Thanks for more of your perspective.
Great analysis. One of the best I’ve seen on the subject of 2001. I’d love to see more movie analyses from you.
Great video. FYI, the bone shot actually cuts to a nuclear missile launcher in orbit. It goes from the most primitive weapon to the most advanced. This also shows humanity's legacy of violence.
Thanks for helping this knucklehead appreciate the themes and ideas behind this movie. I always knew there was something I wasn't really grasping, but let it just be a movie that wasn't one of my favourites. Excited to give it a rewatch with a different lens now!
An even better way to understand it's themes is reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, speaking about the man going in evolution towards the "superman" (also, John Williams' Superman Theme, has the same chords as the Zarathustra's introduction by Richard Strauss).
This upload reminds me that I need to watch the movie. Have you seen 1981's Possession? Dunno if you care for requests, but if you have seen it or 'd like to, I think you should cover it.
I'm not sure I have. I'll look into it and give it a look down the line.
Excellent summary and review of ome of my top three films.
One of the greatest analysis of the greatest cinematic masterpiece in history!
Thank you very much. Cheers!
I've tried to watch this film every ten years or so since I was in my teens. I'm nearly 60 now and still think of it as incredibly boring and slow, despite loving some of the greatest films in the world (including a couple of Kubrick's) and adoring the work many of the greatest filmmakers, especially David Lynch and Orson Welles. Your video makes me want to give it another try, so thanks for your insights.
An even better way to understand it's themes is reading Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche, speaking about the man going in evolution towards the "superman". I also think the movie is even more relevant now, many technological inventions from the film exists today, video calls, memory cards, even microwaves YES, they date back since the 40s but they did not become widespread after the 70s, the same with Artificial Intelligence since the late 90s, now it's important
Though, if we're going to compare a Kubrick film with today's world, I think it would be a bit more like A Clockwork Orange (which might feel more fast paced compared with 2001), even Jan Harlan (Kubrick's brother in law and producer) said that the film that is more likely with today is Dr. Strangelove, sadly and funny.
Awesome analysis of my favourite movie. Thank you
Thank you very much. Glad you enjoyed it!
Thought I recognised that voice. Just subscribed 😀
Thank you for this video! I really liked your theories (?) for this movie.
In the second movie it explains exactly what went wrong with HAL ,he was given 2 conflicting orders and couldnt processes it
I enjoyed 2010, and I especially enjoyed Roy Scheider's performance and Bowman/HAL actors revisiting the roles. But I view that as separate from Kubrick's 2001, something more closely aligned with the books (same thing with The Shining sequel, which to me is more about the books and does not really have much of anything to do with Kubrick's interpretation - at least not in my view).
@@WowLynchWow yeah dude I see what you mean ,keep the first movie as an isolated entity. 🤘😆🤘
11:29 - Your comments about humanity and the moon monolith remind me of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Is that why it directs humanity to the Jupiter monolith? To break some men away from the “cave” that Earth has become?
This movie is the most complex layered, and puzzling of Kubrick movies. Kubrick movies always have a puzzle layer to them. Figuring out the puzzle is part of the fun of Kubrick movies. Beware, spoilers ahead.
The movie is illustrative of Friedrich Nietzsche's 1883 book, "Also sprach Zarathustra". Zoroaster has nothing to do with Nietzsche's character Zarathustra. Nietzsche just thought it was cool to name his character after a founder at the root of religion, particularly Christian religion, to give him authority while the character Zarathustra decries religion, particularly Christian religion. "Also sprach Zarathustra" is the name of that grand title music, the music during the scene where the monolith teaches the ape to use a tool, and the end where it turns the man into a super being.
Nietzsche's character Zarathustra posits the Übermensch (superior man) as a goal for humanity to set for itself. The Übermensch represents a shift from otherworldly death oriented religious, particularly Christian, values and manifests the grounded life affirming human ideal. The Übermensch is someone who has "crossed over" the bridge, from the comfortable, easy, mindless acceptance of what a person has been taught, and what everyone else believes to the mountains of unrest and solitude.
Zarathustra is the narrator of a series of short stories to illustrate, and teach the points to support the position ending each story with "Also sprach Zarathustra", "Thus spoke Zarathustra". In this movie the monolith has the role of Zarathustra. Now you know the monolith character has a name. Zarathustra.
Zarathustra tries to show that the comfortable easy, mindless acceptance of what a person has been taught, and what everyone else believes, is mediocre, and repulsive to the superior man. As inferior, and repulsive as the ape is to man, man is more so to the ubermench. The transition from ape to man takes place from one frame of the movie to another. That's how close man is to ape. The entire 4 million year history of the transition of ape to man is but a blink of the eye in comparison to the transition of mench to ubermench. Zarathustra is disappointed as man instead of being repulsed by the mediocre embraces the mediocre comfortable easy, mindless acceptance of what a person has been taught, and what everyone else believes. This is illustrated in the movie by all the food is repulsive, and has something wrong with it, grubs, raw meat, food sucked through a straw, sandwiches that should be chicken, and ham but are not. But "They're getting better at it" but the coffee's too hot, the paste food trays are also too hot. Despite how we see the effects as fantastic the people in the movie practically sleepwalk through that life. The people are so mediocre (practically dead) Frank, and Dave aren't tippy top fighter jock alphas with "The Right Stuff" of the 1960s space program. They are so alike, bland, and mediocre their breathing doesn't even quicken when they go EVA. They don't even talk to each other until they have to leave their comfort zone, and plot against HAL. Their first words to each other are a lie. Out with Christian morality to affirm, and fight for life. They know they are killing a conscious entity. That's what they're discussing when the sound cuts out in the pod. "No 9000 computer has ever been shut down before.", "Well no 9000 has ever fouled up before.", "That's not what I mean", "?", "I'm not so sure when you think about it...".
"The Trip", as the psychedelic sequence is called, represents the "crossing over the bridge to the mountains of unrest and solitude".
All the food is repulsive except the last meal, it's perfect, comfortable. Except for the broken glass. The most startling moment in movie history. Puzzling too. "What does it mean?" Our hero has reached comfortable middle age. But he's not yet perfect. He's on his death bed before he reaches for perfection. He reaches for the black monolith, the dark side. Then he becomes the superior being. Zarathustra says we must embrace what religious morality says is the dark side to be a superior man. Religious morality says the darkest side is to reject their other worldly god. Zarathustra says "God is dead". Face it, own it. Don't turn to the comfort of false belief in other worldly reward by throwing away the treasure of life banking your treasure in heaven. God is dead, and heaven is bankrupt. Everyone who says otherwise is a lying, thieving beast feasting on your death.
Zarathustra ends the narration saying his story is over, and it's the transformed mench to ubermench hero's story now, and it's just beginning. The movie ends with the image of the hero as a not yet born super being. His story has not yet begun.
The monolith is the same shape as the movie screen. During the intermission it's the only presence on screen for a long time. Black, and exactly that shape. The movie screen has been the narrator of this movie. Its story is over, and we are the hero of our own story, and our story has not yet begun.
Now don't come back at me with "Wow dude, That's so deep." It's not my story. I'm just the narrator. I'm the hero of my own story, I've been gifted beyond reason in my life, and my story is just beginning.
Very interestig stuff. Thanks for sharing.
tight, tight tight
Excellent explanation!! ❤ thank you well done 👍 what a brilliant film - just imagine if somehow it hadn’t been made we’d all be so much the less for it
beautiful movie, excellent analysis!
This film is the perfect example of how movies used to make you think and rethink how you feel about everything.
Movies today are literally ret@rded by comparison.
It wasn't like this all the time, but a recent example of a film that made me think about world's situation and government manipulation, Oppenheimer might be close to that, a bio-pic like the ones Hollywood dosen't make anymore, took me back to films like JFK (I know, very conspiranoic).
You sir, are underrated
Daisy Bell, the song of choice for the first ever singing computer, 1961. A landmark in technological progress, a moment of triumph in computer history. In 2001, we see how far technology has come, and we experience the horror of a murderous computer singing that same song as it is about to be shut down.
At the end Dave Bowman was at the precipice... of an enormous crossroad
Sure makes 2010: The year we make contact, feel very messy on comparison.
I was rewatching this video and a thought occurred to me. Frank Herbert’s Dune was published in 1965 (three years prior to the premiere of 2001) and a major aspect of that fictional universe is a revolt against AI and the subsequent need to train the human mind to replace computers. Could this have partly inspired Kubrick’s thematic approach that our host discusses here?
This was fabulous.
15:36 - I’ve heard on other videos on 2001 that HAL declaring victory in the chess match is an example of HAL “making a mistake,” that the chess match would not have led to HAL’s victory like he claimed. I’m not a real chess expert myself, so I have no idea if this theory holds any water, but what do you think?
I do recall reading something about that. I think had something to do with HAL using incorrect notation, which is a mistake an avid chess player like Kubrick would never have made unless it were deliberate. I think that fits with the theme of HAL mimicking the human art of deception.
@@WowLynchWow And the human simply accepts it, because the computer is never wrong. Until it is…
Brilliant commentary!
Wow, Lynch, wow.
I agree. A masterpiece and the no. 1 movie in my opinion. Thank you for this analysis!
"Till imagination-the dawn of the East-suddenly begining"
-William Blake
Great anslysis, I learned some new things.
Gorgeous analysis, fascinating, deep, thought-provoking, and very moving. Bravo!
Thank you very much!
The ape with the bone defends/murders the opposing ape over a pool of water. Hal later defends himself through murdering the astronaut who suspects the computer’s infallibility. Frank Poole. A film about artificial intelligence in a pursuit of survival.
It's not God who puts the monolith there. It's the Devil.
Wow, wow, wow...I'm a writer, and I've listened to countless TH-cam essays about 2001, your analysis is spot on! Your views made me see this movie on another level. Great insight! Your quote "sperm-shaped spacecraft" is priceless!
Liked and SUBBED!
I think the apes already knew about violence. The big cat attacked one of them. The other tribe scared them away from water with the threat of violence.
The Hal conflicting order is not until the sequel right ?
You sir, are a genius!
Have you thought about reviewing koyaanisqatsi?
really good
Thank you very much. Cheers!
Why is the first three minutes of the film a dark screen?
Can’t be the goat film when Star Wars exists.
Okay thats tight
The official Catholic church endorsed the film based on the same themes your video outlines. (They did not feel the same about "Lolita", quite the opposite in fact)
Oh man, I've seen you on the recent Rob Ager video about Han Solo, and now you're here? the algorythm brought us here. Didn't know that about the Catholic Church, although I do know that Ben-Hur is part of the Vatican film list, in the religion category, 2001 is in the art category I think along with Nosferatu (YES), Napoleon (1927), Metropolis, The Wizard of Oz, Citizen Kane, Stagecoach, Fantasia, was a big surprise on that list, the values category includes Schindler's List, It's a Wonderful Life and One the Waterfront. I wonder about the Catholic Church views on Kubrick's next films, like A Clockwork Orange.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
"To hide the most evident God in a hidden covert, even
In the shadows of a Woman & a secluded Holy Place
That we may pry after him as after a stolen treasure
Hidden among the Dead & mured up from the paths of life
Hand! art thou not Reuben enrooting thyself into Bashan
Till thou remainest a vaporous Shadow in a Void! O Merlin!
Unknown among the Dead where never before Existence came."
-William Blake
Hell yeah rummy
RUMMY🗣️
Q-ubric chose Thus spoke Zarathustra. Could Mozart' the magic flute have some connections? It's about a man meeting God.
Even when I'm in fraction form I'm still the whole.
Why describe the very movie EVERYONE has seen?
You ask similar questions as anyone!
Kind of filthy, in a way, to over-analyze 2001.
Wait a minute- Rummy?
It's the ending that loses me. I thought it was a great film until the end. Biggest anticlimax in history.
I don’t mean to insult you but is that your own voice or an AI generated voice? It sounds like AI. Which would be ironic
Read the book by Arthur C. Clarke. Someone once noted, "Kubrick touched the monolith. But Clarke went inside."
I don't know. 18 mins into it and you're merely recapping everything in excruciating detail what we already know. You touch on sone crucial points yet leap off to return to tge recap. It's like when someone covers a Beatles song and try to sound exactly how the Beatles did it. What's the point?
A fantastic film that is somewhat spoiled by the ending itself
mid
This AI voice is very very difficult to listen to. As if everything what Kubrick intended is defeated by what is encrypted in the ugliness of this voice.
😅reincarnation.