Top 4 Prioritization techniques in Product Management explained simply

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ส.ค. 2024
  • Subscribe for more content: www.youtube.co...
    Prioritization can suck your soul out of you but no worries I can help you with that. Simplicity is your best weapon to defeat complexity.
    During this video, I share four prioritization techniques that can help you:
    - RICE
    - ICE
    - Value Matrix
    - MoSCoW
    If you enjoyed this video, you will probably enjoy this article as well:
    / beating-the-prioritiza...
    Take one of my crash courses to overcome your challenges as a Product Professional
    - Becoming an Outstanding Product Owner: 10 years of experience summarized in 4 hours of insights. www.udemy.com/...
    - How to Become a Strong Product Owner: Learn how to avoid the traps ahead of you as a Product Owner. www.udemy.com/...
    - How to Master User Stories: Learn how to use User Stories to engage teams and uncover meaningful solutions. www.udemy.com/...
    Follow me on: 
    - d-pereira.com
    - LinkedIn: / davidavpereira
    - Twitter: / davidavpereira​
     - Medium: / davidavpereira
    Product Management. Product Manager, Product Owner, Agile, Scrum, How to improve as Product Manager
    #productmanager​ #productmanagement #startup #careerdevelopment
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @lamanmahammadli2963
    @lamanmahammadli2963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm glad you mentioned the gut feeling. It is always debatable how much you should rely on your gut feeling, especially when you are new to the product or industry. I personally like scoring methods like ICE/RICE because confidence has equal weight as the other criteria. Hippos also have a gut feeling, like every other stakeholder. The determining factor on what to tackle next could be a high confidence rate gained through previous learnings, user or market research.

    • @DavidPereira88
      @DavidPereira88  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Laman,
      I perceive prioritization as a reflection exercise. What matters most now is what I want to focus on, and then identify opportunities to benefit from.
      Scoring methods are helpful but demanding and the numbers can distract us. Just be careful with that.
      The value matrix helps us have a conversation around the relevant metrics. Different than HiPPO approach, we can evaluate with more people and reason on it. The danger of HiPPO is the mindset, I want that done because I believe to be the right thing. That is insufficient as it doesn’t compare with other options.
      A bias towards action is what has helped me in this world.

  • @irajt5667
    @irajt5667 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a great channel. I wish i had found it before. Thank you David...so very insightful and helpful.

  • @dollaya8893
    @dollaya8893 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is helpful. Thank you so much

  • @petertoth6973
    @petertoth6973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the overview which was a important reminder :) helped me in my current situation!

    • @DavidPereira88
      @DavidPereira88  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice to hear from you Peter. Which part helped you?

    • @petertoth6973
      @petertoth6973 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidPereira88 for me the most important part was the reminder to keep thinks simple as prioritization is still a looot of gut feeling. You know it yourself: you are the sole PO, trying hard to keep the Product Vision running while everybody is coming up with requests... so while saying "no" almost all the time, you somehow try to find a way to organize the chaos, which can be time consuming... here a friendly reminder like "make it simple" helps to re-focus and invest time better :)

  • @baozarzakariyyah8351
    @baozarzakariyyah8351 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you 😊

  • @ermanmanyasli
    @ermanmanyasli ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess your quadrant in min 6 is a bit incorrect. If stg is not easy to build & also doesn't promise that much impact, it is waste of time. hence, you need to replace reds and grey circles' positions in your quadrant imho.

    • @DavidPereira88
      @DavidPereira88  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not really.
      Easiness of implementation means how quickly you can implement. The more to the right, the quicker. Meaning that the beginning is hard.

    • @mitchelroe7829
      @mitchelroe7829 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DavidPereira88 I just watched this and came to comment the same thing as @erman… but then noticed you’re using “Easiness” instead of the more common “Difficulty” that we normally see on these graphs.
      If the X axis were difficulty, then you would need to swap red and grey… but should also have a swap between green and orange.
      With difficulty on the bottom you would get a reverse result of:
      High return, low effort=green
      High return, high effort=orange
      Low return, low effort=grey
      Low return, high effort=red

  • @sahils007in
    @sahils007in 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!!

    • @DavidPereira88
      @DavidPereira88  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Sahil. Which part did you enjoy the most?

    • @sahils007in
      @sahils007in 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DavidPereira88 I like the matrix technique very much!!

    • @DavidPereira88
      @DavidPereira88  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sahils007in Cool! I am happy to know it.