The Mind-Blowing Proof of Time Dilation: Muon Decay Experiment

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2024
  • One of the earliest experimental verification to Time Dilation, and Length Contraction, and hence the predictions of Special Theory of Relativity, came from studying the Muon Decay experiment through atmosphere.
    When Cosmic rays strike the Earth's upper atmosphere, it creates muons, also known as mu-mesons, that travel at 98% the speed of light towards the Earth's surface. These subatomic particles have a very short average lifespan of around 2 microseconds. According to calculations, most of these muons should decay before reaching the Earth's surface. However, the number of such muon particles that reach the surface is much higher than expected. This is because, when muons are travelling at such high velovities, their clocks tick slowly, thus increasing the average lifespan with respect to an observer on earth.
    00:00 Muon Decay Experiment
    01:59 Non Relativistic calculations
    08:15 Time Dilation (wrt Earth)
    15:36 Length Contraction (wrt Muon)
    #SpecialTheoryofRelativity #STR
    𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬
    Your financial support provides me an additional incentive to create high quality lecture videos. I am very much thankful for your generosity and kindness
    Support in Patreon ❤️❤️❤️ / dibyajyotidas
    Donate in Paypal 🔥🔥🔥 paypal.me/FortheLoveofPhysics
    JOIN as a member in TH-cam 😇😇😇
    / @fortheloveofphysics
    𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬
    PLAYLIST ON Special Theory of Relativity
    • Special Theory of Rela...
    -----------------------------------------------------
    1. History of Special Relativity ► • History of Special Rel...
    2. Michelson Morley Experiment ► • Michelson Morley Exper...
    3. Special Theory of Relativity ► • Special Theory of Rela...
    4. Time Dilation (Thought Exp) ► • What is Time Dilation?...
    5. Length Contraction (Thought Exp) ► • What is Length Contrac...
    6. Lorentz Transormations ► • Derive Lorentz Transfo...
    7. Relativity of Simultaneity ► • Relativity of Simultan...
    8. Can you prove E=MC² ► • Can you PROVE the most...
    -----------------------------------------------------
    9. Special Theory of Relativity ► • Special Theory of Rela...
    10. Length Contraction ► • Length Contraction (Sp...
    11. Length Contraction of Inclined Rod ► • Length Contraction (& ...
    12. Time Dilation ► • The Mind Bending Predi...
    13. Muon Decay Experiment ► • The Mind-Blowing Proof...
    14. Relativistic Velocity Transformations ► • Derivation of Relativi...
    15. Speed of light in moving medium ► • Speed of Light in a mo...
    16. Relativistic Doppler Effect ► • What is Relativistic D...
    17. Relativistic Mass? ► • What is Relativistic m...
    18. Relativistic Kinetic Energy ► • Relativistic Kinetic E...
    19. Relativistic Force ► • Relativistic Force
    20. Relativistic Energy & Momentum ► • Relativistic Energy an...
    21. Magnetism arises from Relativity ► • The Hidden Connection ...
    22. GATE Physics question ► • GATE Physics: Problem ...
    23. TIFR Physics question ► • TIFR Physics: Problem ...
    24. Question on Volume contraction ► • Volume Contraction in ...
    25. JEST Physics question ► • JEST Physics: Solving ...
    26. NET Physics question ► • CSIR-NET Physics Probl...
    27. Spacetime Invariant Interval ► • SPACETIME Interval & i...
    28. Minkowski Spacetime ► • Minkowski SPACETIME, H...
    29. Eucledian Space & Minkowski Spacetime ► • 5 Main Differences b/w...
    30. Spacetime Diagrams ► • Time Dilation, Length ...
    31. Four Vectors in Relativity ► • What are FOUR VECTORS ...
    32. Doppler Effect using 4-vectors ► • How to use 4 VECTORS t...
    33. Compton Effect using 4-vectors ► • How to prove Compton e...
    34. Particle Decay using 4-vectors ► • Particle Decay in Rela...
    35. (SHORTS) Does Light experience time ► • Does light photon expe...
    36. (SHORTS) Light for moving observer ► • What is the speed of L...
    37. (SHORTS) Nothing can travel faster than light ► • Why nothing can travel...
    38. (SHORTS) What is farther away ► • What is farther away, ...

ความคิดเห็น • 115

  • @FortheLoveofPhysics
    @FortheLoveofPhysics  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Relativistic Velocity Transformations ► th-cam.com/video/e21RCw8GRjM/w-d-xo.html

    • @RolanRoyce
      @RolanRoyce ปีที่แล้ว

      You, like the physicists who expound this theory, didn't actually think it through entirely. If, from our point of view, the muons are traveling close to c and it results in their time being 1/10th of ours then why didn't you state what our time would be from the muon's perspective when it views our frame as being the one moving at close to c? Let's take care of it right now, the Muon views its time during the trip as being less than 2.2 ms, let's say 2 ms, so what does it see our time as being, if it's the reverse of what we saw its being from our frame? The math is very simple, 1/10th of 2.2 is 0.2. So we must have seen the muons traversing the atmosphere in 0.2 seconds, which is a lot less than the video said.
      That of course is why nobody has ever actually stated what the muons would see our time as, they just skipped that part and went to length contraction, saying that it explained how the muons got through the atmosphere before decaying, because it was shallower in its view than we see it being in ours. Well why didn't they mention length contraction of the muon's frame from our view? Could it be for the obvious reason that if the muon frame was contracted, like it saw ours being, then it should actually take longer for it to traverse the atmosphere from our view, because it would be deeper relative to the muons?
      Now do the video again, stating all the factors from both frames' viewpoints. Obviously you won't, and neither will anyone else who supports the clearly invalid theory. How can it really be explained why the muons make it to earth? Maybe accelerated muons live longer than non-accelerated ones, could be that simple. Acceleration to near c takes a lot of energy input, so maybe that makes them resistant to decay.

  • @cesarjom
    @cesarjom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This is a wonderfully concise and thorough explanation and demonstration of special relativity's spacetime transformations. You have a real talent for communicating this subject!

  • @himangshudeka8809
    @himangshudeka8809 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Good to see you on greenboard again. You set an example for those who thinks without digital board online teaching can't be possible 🙏

    • @HimmatBording
      @HimmatBording 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I just love that Green Board.

  • @jonathancollins3785
    @jonathancollins3785 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Far and away the clearest explanation I have ever seen of Time Dilation and Length Contraction. Great Job.

  • @meganjoyce5351
    @meganjoyce5351 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This helped me understand a time difference situation in a movie I haven't finished yet. Maybe it will be the first time I figure out what the heck is going on in a sci-fi movie before it ends. Your explanations as you worked through the formulas was easy to follow even though I am completely lost with the written calculations. Thank you for posting this. I am now subscribed.

  • @timbuktu8886
    @timbuktu8886 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What I don't get: The situation for the muon is, that earth is moving close to the speed of light, so earth's clock should be moving slower according to the muon. So when it reaches earth
    and it says: "2 microseconds have passed for me", it should assume that even less time has elapsed for the waiting earthling. But that is not the case as, the opposite seems to be true, i.e. more time has passed for the earthling. I am confused.

  • @saksham5882
    @saksham5882 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Keep it up
    I can see the passion you have
    Dont stop! Keep spreading knowledge!

  • @proffeintein
    @proffeintein 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We've waited for you for a long time....welcome back

  • @tiara3ink
    @tiara3ink 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can't express how much I love all your videos! Have helped me immensely!

  • @get2aa
    @get2aa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you! This clears so many doubts I had. Thanks again or else my mind would have exploded thinking about it. Keep up the good work brother.

  • @blakekatuin9679
    @blakekatuin9679 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wanted to say thanks for a great video best one I’ve found about muons on TH-cam

  • @brianlee2278
    @brianlee2278 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is quite literally the best explanation of not just the muon decay experiment but anything special relativity. This guy is a master at work!

  • @JustJK14
    @JustJK14 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maza aagya! Aur ye Jo maza hai na! Mai saare desh ko dena chahuga 😁👍 best on TH-cam

  • @dibyenduchatterjee9262
    @dibyenduchatterjee9262 ปีที่แล้ว

    A problem based on muon paradox was asked in JAM 2015 which I could not understand until I saw your explanation.
    For me this is the clearest explanation.

  • @CAL-1442
    @CAL-1442 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Clear, Concise, and Beautiful.

  • @drmk816
    @drmk816 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    after watching a lot of videos of yours i have got your name because the content and the way of teaching just make me pick the copy and pen and forget about the short intro..
    love for physics ❤️

  • @prafullapradhan3533
    @prafullapradhan3533 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video, I was struggling to grasp time dilation, this video has very good insights into time dilation

  • @aravindgitamuralee5708
    @aravindgitamuralee5708 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, excellent handwriting!

  • @Consa_Lu
    @Consa_Lu ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped me so much! Thank you!
    Awesome explanation

  • @sadanandbhardwaj5110
    @sadanandbhardwaj5110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent explanation dear teacher It will help your students in a big way 👍👍

  • @gaytrimenon
    @gaytrimenon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    absolutely briliant explanation, thank you for your help!

  • @mooseriderwpg9586
    @mooseriderwpg9586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you soooo much. i could never quite wrap my head about this without some minkovski paper. this video really made my brain 'click'

  • @brainpain5260
    @brainpain5260 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outstanding. Thank you I wish the actual data was shown though. That's all I was looking for but the lecture was so good I watched the whole thing. How well does the experimental data fit the theory and where can I find it?

  • @anasahmad3859
    @anasahmad3859 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am feeling good to see you on green board .. Because your lectures on green board are more understandable than software

  • @sanemp9605
    @sanemp9605 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello sir. Your work is much appreciated. Iam glad i could find you.
    I have a request. Please make a Quantum Mechanics playlist. I couldn't find a better indian lecture on that. Please consider

  • @txemaglez8251
    @txemaglez8251 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Este video es una obra de arte. Quiero agradecerle su labor divulgativa y su talento para hacerse entender. saludos.

  • @harry-ho9ti
    @harry-ho9ti 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We Will never forgot ur hard work sir.

  • @sarujan02thangavel93
    @sarujan02thangavel93 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much sir. Perfect explanation

  • @vanshtibrewal4791
    @vanshtibrewal4791 ปีที่แล้ว

    Loved your explanation very much sir❤️❤️

  • @nagadurgarajuadaka
    @nagadurgarajuadaka 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Dibyajyothi Das, we are delighted to see u.we request you to make a series of vedios on solar system components and the physics decay on those celestial bodies....

  • @deepanjan1234
    @deepanjan1234 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just great. Hats off to you sir

  • @HypotheticalZ
    @HypotheticalZ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent explanation…

  • @subratadhara7411
    @subratadhara7411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very much helping..
    Make some videos on quantum mechanics

  • @lbu5543
    @lbu5543 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing!! Thanks sir

  • @KhalidMehmood-if7ii
    @KhalidMehmood-if7ii 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained

  • @rupeshraja394
    @rupeshraja394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation sir.

  • @CleydsonGomes
    @CleydsonGomes 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job.

  • @misswashington6525
    @misswashington6525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear explanation :)

  • @monikarajasekar966
    @monikarajasekar966 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation , thanks a lot sir.please provide problem solving questions to crack pg entrance at central university level.thank you

  • @kushagra1556
    @kushagra1556 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir jab tk ap samne the itna seriously nhi sune 😢ab jab ni h vha to yourube se seekh rhe aapse😅😅😅ab lg rha ksh us samay pdhe hote itna acha content samne mil rha tha 😅😅😅

  • @bishalbasak9081
    @bishalbasak9081 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello...i was introduced with the planck constant in the blackbody radiation problem...then it appeared in photo electric effect then it appeared in compton effect then suddenly planck constant appeared in quantum theory and all its application. Now i was reading about phonon where we again find that the energy of each phonon is planck constant times frequency of phonon...but why it is planck constant?shouldn't it be other constant...and suddenly why planck constant was regarded as fundamental? Can you please explain why it a fundamental constant?why quantisation of every type of field must have particles whose properties such as energy and momentum are associated with planck constant?why this creepy planck constant?

  • @rajuranjankumar1695
    @rajuranjankumar1695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My optional paper ( physics) for UPSC CSE. It's very very good explanation of physics for UPSC CSE topics covered all clear sir 👍👍👍👍👍 optional paper physics ✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️

  • @ravikantpatil3398
    @ravikantpatil3398 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The mind blowing. The video makes must offer padmabhushan for popularized of science

  • @rajuranjankumar1695
    @rajuranjankumar1695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation 👍👍👍👍👍🙏🙏 🙏🙏🙏

  • @krishnendukundu6446
    @krishnendukundu6446 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am biochemistry students,,but still I listen your lecture and starts to loving physics. Plz make a NMR lecture series

    • @HimanshuSharma-xn6uc
      @HimanshuSharma-xn6uc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please go watch chemistry untold channel he explained spectroscopy very briefly

  • @physipa9859
    @physipa9859 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb screen play ❤

  • @anshulgupta6320
    @anshulgupta6320 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir can you make the videos based on jee physics and it's all of the course

  • @jeetsingh-bg7fz
    @jeetsingh-bg7fz ปีที่แล้ว

    CLEAREST EXPLANATION TO THE DILATION AND CONTRACTION CONCEPT ……..STRANGE HOW SAME TIME AND SAME DISTANCE INVERSLY CHANGE IN ACTUAL S FOR TWO OBSERVERS JUST BECAUSE THE TIME SPACE FABRIC CHANGES IN RESPECTIVE WAYS FOR EACH …..MIND BLOWING

  • @souravmallick7699
    @souravmallick7699 ปีที่แล้ว

    The realisation of that you understand a topic which not understand before gives more satisfaction then anything else.,😌

  • @alexanderpotoky2565
    @alexanderpotoky2565 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sir for the video. Can you please clarify this: why, when the Earth is addressed you consider 10 km between the Earth and the Muon, while when Muon is addressed you consider 2 km between the Earth and the Muon? Shouldn't the frames of reference of each of them be equal? Thank you.

  • @aftabsahar5528
    @aftabsahar5528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a great lecture 😍
    Love from Pakistan💞

  • @sbkarajan
    @sbkarajan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shouldn't length contraction applied to the Muon, the traveling object, not on the surrounding universe?
    If length contraction is applied like that, then the mass increase should be applied to the earth and the universe as well?

  • @ranjankamila743
    @ranjankamila743 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great❤️❤️❤️

  • @lovephysics
    @lovephysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please explain relativistic kinematics of particles in four vectors?

  • @missionphysics7519
    @missionphysics7519 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir I read in class eight.I have completed general theory of relativity in class 7 and I can understand your lecture and thanks you for this kind of higher lecture

    • @PioneersOppenheimer
      @PioneersOppenheimer ปีที่แล้ว

      Chal
      Bata
      In Minkowsi space time the distance between the points lying on the hyperbola and origin are same
      True or False

  • @SaharMohseni
    @SaharMohseni 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the equation for radioactive decay correct? I think you forgot to include ln(2) in the exponent e: : -t * ln(2) / (muon lifespan)?

  • @tmtarun6728
    @tmtarun6728 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like your explanation 😘😘

  • @1.halloweltdeutschmitarthu655
    @1.halloweltdeutschmitarthu655 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you!

  • @jeffreydaclan1035
    @jeffreydaclan1035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very comprehensive video, I did not physics after all.

  • @sheshankutty8552
    @sheshankutty8552 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is not the Muon "accelerated" from the source to near speed of light and that might have been the cause of time dilation?

  • @ekottro9817
    @ekottro9817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing

  • @anarakberov7173
    @anarakberov7173 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if the oberserver moves with the muons ?

  • @DC-zi6se
    @DC-zi6se 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is nuts 🤯

  • @laurieknapp5264
    @laurieknapp5264 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve always wondered, why did we conclude that time is moving more slowly, and not just conclude that something about motion affects whatever forces are leading to the radioactive decay? Time itself should be independent of things like radioactive decay, and mechanistic processes of clocks which are either driven by EM forces or gravitational forces. So again, isn’t it easier to say that motion affects those forces, thus making it seem as if the clocks are ticking slower, or a particle is less affected by whatever forces are causing it to decay? Maybe there is no such abstract thing as time, and instead there are just other forces which lead to processes happening in certain directions at certain speeds.

  • @HJS74
    @HJS74 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But how do you solve in this contest the twin paradox? For the muon the clock of the observer on heart is ticking slowly but which of the clock sign a lesser time spent in the travel?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both the inertial observers think the other's clock is ticking slower. That's what str tells us

  • @rupeshraja394
    @rupeshraja394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @user-rg5qr6zn9m
    @user-rg5qr6zn9m 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much

  • @tamalpal660
    @tamalpal660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful. I always had doubts on this during my student life. One question. There is no difference between an observer at motion or static. Both r in motion according to the other one and static according to him. Now if I define the observer on the muon as static, which I can, then how the result can be explained?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Acc to muon, distance gets contracted. Lifetime remains same

  • @harinachiappansubramanian9206
    @harinachiappansubramanian9206 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice one... :)

  • @aadityachaudhari2510
    @aadityachaudhari2510 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please make a video on the g2 force experiment by fermilab

  • @musimusi8129
    @musimusi8129 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir kindly upload the videos of electronics ( MSc physics)

  • @jeetsingh-bg7fz
    @jeetsingh-bg7fz ปีที่แล้ว

    Bloody makes perfect sense to a phenomenon sounding northing less than a witchcraft all these days ….congratulations 🎉

  • @anjali-tp5wh
    @anjali-tp5wh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir plz make video in cp violations.🙏

  • @abdurrauf7525
    @abdurrauf7525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks sir for this Crystal clear explanation.

  • @mohammadmansoor9807
    @mohammadmansoor9807 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, As per muon we are travelling at a speed of light then why don't our clock slow down and the length contract in his perspective.

  • @ibrahimsaifee8395
    @ibrahimsaifee8395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well explained
    But I have one question why we have considered length contraction for the observer on muon, w.r.t. this observer the whole earth is moving and the time of earth should be dilated (w.r.t. him).

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We can obtain the results by either approach..
      1) acc to earth observer, muon's time is dilated
      2) according to muon, distance is contracted
      For both, results are consistent

    • @ibrahimsaifee8395
      @ibrahimsaifee8395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics ok, thank you 😊

  • @rajeshvaghela12
    @rajeshvaghela12 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beutiful example

  • @Tzadokite
    @Tzadokite ปีที่แล้ว

    the Time Dilation equation, of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations, is a purely kinematical equation. if we apply it to the cosmic muon as shown, then we must assume that the Earth is moving at -0.998c relative to the muon. however, this would be a violation of the conservation of linear momentum for the Earth-Muon system. for the earth-muon system we have M(earth)*v(earth) = -m(muon)*v(muon). hence, v(earth)= -(m/M) * 0.998c. this is not equal to v(earth) = -0.998c. in fact the v(earth) is essentially 0. we cannot use v(earth) = -v(muon) = 0.998c in order to apply the time dilation equation. we have to use gravitational time dilation which is insignificant given the GF of the earth to increase the decay time of the cosmic muon to reach the earth surface.

  • @evalsoftserver
    @evalsoftserver 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    MUON break Spacetime symmetry equal Dark Matter/GRAVITATIONAL Field , Equal Time Dilation,As Gauge symmetry equal LEPTON/BOSON field and when this symmetry is Scaled equal BARYON FERMION matter field.

  • @jayashreedas7629
    @jayashreedas7629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please make a video on four vectors and their application..

    • @brainpain5260
      @brainpain5260 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      there are relativity courses online that explain this well. Leonard Suskind does a class at Stanford on this subject and Ramamurti Shankar covers this is his class at Yale. Shankar covers Relativity starting at lecture 12 while suskinds whole course is on Special Relativity. They are both great lecturers

  • @ajilbabu13
    @ajilbabu13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please add the topic twin paradox

  • @coderhex1675
    @coderhex1675 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are not telling science history or science fictction. They are all $hit for making some $. Thank you and keep up. Good to see you again 😊 BTW: sorry for my bad english, i am not native speaker.

  • @jnhrtmn
    @jnhrtmn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The lab does not have a transition from naked space to Earth atmosphere, not to mention entering a gravitational potential, so all of the foundational data may be completely pointless. At best, ALL of this is just a test for Relativity. If you look at it another way (without postulates), it proves that particles can travel faster than light. That is a matter of perspective and what data you hang your hat on. Relativity says that if you move your head, the entire Universe INSTANTLY changes shape along that axis JUST FOR YOU! Luckily, this goofy story is only true ON PAPER, and the NON-transformed reality IS STILL THERE IGNORED, so we can pick it up in the future sometime.

  • @singkreality3041
    @singkreality3041 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir, why not an observer on earth considers length contraction?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Observer on earth is at rest. So distance acc to him is not contracted

    • @singkreality3041
      @singkreality3041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics it is the same case for the observer on the muon, he is at rest

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Acc to muon, earth is in motion, so atmospheric distance is contracted

  • @arjundhumale5918
    @arjundhumale5918 ปีที่แล้ว

    👌👌👍

  • @sunmoniborah6589
    @sunmoniborah6589 ปีที่แล้ว

    dada apuni je nagaon aji he gom paisu....

  • @hamsafar..
    @hamsafar.. ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍👍

  • @scimathist
    @scimathist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are the next RICHARD FEYMAN........

  • @ritupal4052
    @ritupal4052 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    but bro muons are not called mu-mesons.

  • @reidmortensen2629
    @reidmortensen2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This poses an interesting question:
    How do we as people on a rock moving through the cosmos calculate our relativistic static speed? Do we know if we are already moving near the speed of light? And if we were, because we are on the item traveling close to the speed of light (like the observer on the muon); would we know it or would our ability to measure the speed of light be hampered by the dilation we experience by nature of us taking measurements in our natural state?
    I’ve often thought of this as we discuss interstellar travel; as we move away from the time dilation that our sun and our planet cause, does the distances between the stars remain as time consuming as we assume them to be from here?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is no absolute reference frame. Only relative speeds wrt observers.
      If u understand this, your problem will be resolved.

    • @reidmortensen2629
      @reidmortensen2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FortheLoveofPhysics
      This makes sense. And in fact right after posing this question I stumbled upon your video from several days ago relating to the answer I was looking for.
      Thank you for both your response and your very accessible educational demonstrations.
      I feel quite special to merit both. You are a blessing to me.

  • @abcdef2069
    @abcdef2069 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    at 16:25 length contraction x time dilation = blowing up the universe
    so.. if i deal with the deep space travelers, i only need to deal with what kind of clock they have, since i cant detect their lengths, and i also need to show them a lousy falsified earth measure stick to guide them , so that i can fool them to capture these travelers. they cant control my clock as i cant control their lengths.

  • @sheshankutty8552
    @sheshankutty8552 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He is assuming the values of Muon observer. So that is NOT exactly the verification of Muon observer proof.

  • @akhtar0335
    @akhtar0335 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thn y nt mass also increases ??
    🤣

  • @nikhilsomvanshi9960
    @nikhilsomvanshi9960 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brooo, this is creepy as hell honestly. I've heard nature can be weird but for it to be this weird :|

  • @ramesh_rm
    @ramesh_rm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    :)

  • @LeoTaxilFrance
    @LeoTaxilFrance 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are wonderful!

  • @LeoTaxilFrance
    @LeoTaxilFrance 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only thing, that remains unclear, why "time dilation" SHOULD be applied to a standing observer and NOT "length contaction"?

    • @FortheLoveofPhysics
      @FortheLoveofPhysics  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because for the standing observer, the mountain/atmosphere height doesn't change, but the muon's lifetime is dilated

  • @AngadSinghKushwaha9452288059
    @AngadSinghKushwaha9452288059 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic explanation so far