Derivation of Relativistic Velocity Transformations: Simplified | Problem Solving

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ค. 2024
  • Relativistic velocity transformations relate velocities of objects with respect to two different observers in relative motion, that is consistent with special theory of relativity.
    In classical (newtonian) mechanics, velocity additions / transformations are very simple. However, special theory of relativity poses a problem, as it introduces speed of light as the universal speed barrier, i.e. no object can travel at velocities greater than the speed of light. Hence we need to derive new velocity transformations that are consistent with Relativity. In fact, what we derive will be the general velocity transformation equations, and our Galilean velocity addition theorem are a special case of those general equations.
    00:00 Introduction
    05:12 Derivation
    16:13 Problem Solving
    #SpecialTheoryofRelativity #STR
    𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬
    Your financial support provides me an additional incentive to create high quality lecture videos. I am very much thankful for your generosity and kindness
    Support in Patreon ❤️❤️❤️ / dibyajyotidas
    Donate in Paypal 🔥🔥🔥 paypal.me/FortheLoveofPhysics
    JOIN as a member in TH-cam 😇😇😇
    / @fortheloveofphysics
    𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬𓏬
    PLAYLIST ON Special Theory of Relativity
    • Special Theory of Rela...
    -----------------------------------------------------
    1. History of Special Relativity ► • History of Special Rel...
    2. Michelson Morley Experiment ► • Michelson Morley Exper...
    3. Special Theory of Relativity ► • Special Theory of Rela...
    4. Time Dilation (Thought Exp) ► • What is Time Dilation?...
    5. Length Contraction (Thought Exp) ► • What is Length Contrac...
    6. Lorentz Transormations ► • Derive Lorentz Transfo...
    7. Relativity of Simultaneity ► • Relativity of Simultan...
    8. Can you prove E=MC² ► • Can you PROVE the most...
    -----------------------------------------------------
    9. Special Theory of Relativity ► • Special Theory of Rela...
    10. Length Contraction ► • Length Contraction (Sp...
    11. Length Contraction of Inclined Rod ► • Length Contraction (& ...
    12. Time Dilation ► • The Mind Bending Predi...
    13. Muon Decay Experiment ► • The Mind-Blowing Proof...
    14. Relativistic Velocity Transformations ► • Derivation of Relativi...
    15. Speed of light in moving medium ► • Speed of Light in a mo...
    16. Relativistic Doppler Effect ► • What is Relativistic D...
    17. Relativistic Mass? ► • What is Relativistic m...
    18. Relativistic Kinetic Energy ► • Relativistic Kinetic E...
    19. Relativistic Force ► • Relativistic Force
    20. Relativistic Energy & Momentum ► • Relativistic Energy an...
    21. Magnetism arises from Relativity ► • The Hidden Connection ...
    22. GATE Physics question ► • GATE Physics: Problem ...
    23. TIFR Physics question ► • TIFR Physics: Problem ...
    24. Question on Volume contraction ► • Volume Contraction in ...
    25. JEST Physics question ► • JEST Physics: Solving ...
    26. NET Physics question ► • CSIR-NET Physics Probl...
    27. Spacetime Invariant Interval ► • SPACETIME Interval & i...
    28. Minkowski Spacetime ► • Minkowski SPACETIME, H...
    29. Eucledian Space & Minkowski Spacetime ► • 5 Main Differences b/w...
    30. Spacetime Diagrams ► • Time Dilation, Length ...
    31. Four Vectors in Relativity ► • What are FOUR VECTORS ...
    32. Doppler Effect using 4-vectors ► • How to use 4 VECTORS t...
    33. Compton Effect using 4-vectors ► • How to prove Compton e...
    34. Particle Decay using 4-vectors ► • Particle Decay in Rela...
    35. (SHORTS) Does Light experience time ► • Does light photon expe...
    36. (SHORTS) Light for moving observer ► • What is the speed of L...
    37. (SHORTS) Nothing can travel faster than light ► • Why nothing can travel...
    38. (SHORTS) What is farther away ► • What is farther away, ...

ความคิดเห็น • 59

  • @FortheLoveofPhysics
    @FortheLoveofPhysics  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    15. Speed of light in moving medium ► th-cam.com/video/WQfqHDsHAZM/w-d-xo.html

  • @sudh_nshu
    @sudh_nshu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Real talented Physics teacher... Hats off sir

    • @vivekasarkar5379
      @vivekasarkar5379 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bengalis are The Talented People...!!! 🌝❤️✨

  • @bhavana.1299
    @bhavana.1299 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    At 15:42, the numerators for inverse Transforms of uy, uz are slightly off!
    Numerator for uy should have been uy(dash)*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2).
    Similar correction for uz.
    For the rest, the video is perfect! :)

  • @doutormanhattan5680
    @doutormanhattan5680 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I will never forget about the first video that I saw on your channel. I was looking for something about radioactive decayment. I was struck by the illuminating way you explained things. Thank you.

  • @vulcandarthvader6617
    @vulcandarthvader6617 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Sir, you have a really amazing time way of explaining things! I admire your teaching a lot and your videos very interesting as always!
    Hope your channel reaches out to many more people!
    May mass×acceleration always be with you! 🙏

  • @asishpanda3547
    @asishpanda3547 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the way u teach man. Making every bit very clear

  • @_boss_baby_
    @_boss_baby_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    sir your way of explanation is really amazing, your videos are clearing my all doubts related to relativity
    Thanks a lot

  • @sutopamodak6247
    @sutopamodak6247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your whole relativity playlist is awesome..... ❤️❤️❤️❤️
    I've just completed it.

  • @sreekumargopakumar10
    @sreekumargopakumar10 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am so glad I listened to this video. Goes to explain the momentum equations in a later video.

  • @muskansharma433
    @muskansharma433 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained sir.... 👏👏have understood it clearly.. Thank you so much!

  • @stfjemam3507
    @stfjemam3507 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video sir, Good detailing and Break down of Equations as well as presenting their significance, Really loved it. God bless you ❤

  • @dhruv0x0x0
    @dhruv0x0x0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    finally concept smjh agya, adbhut anand ki anubhuti horhi hai 🤩

  • @worldfromhome4033
    @worldfromhome4033 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Clear and to the point explanation .Thank you sir

  • @Ravi_477
    @Ravi_477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The way you explain is great sir 👍

  • @rajuranjankumar1695
    @rajuranjankumar1695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir for this crystal clear explanation 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @user-ny1zd3js4p
    @user-ny1zd3js4p 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir i understood lessons as well .thank you sir to help to us to improve our knowledge . I was amazing when you teaching .good luck.❤❤❤

  • @zyadkhater1772
    @zyadkhater1772 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great explanation. thank you

  • @ktstech3763
    @ktstech3763 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hey sir your teaching is really awsm!!

  • @manaoharsam4211
    @manaoharsam4211 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation.

  • @DarthLala106
    @DarthLala106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Discovered your channel yesterday, and am currently studying the same topic. Waiting eagerly for Relativistic Doppler Effect as well as effect of medium speed, as these are the only things a bit confusing. Thanks for this clear and amazing lecture.

  • @nehaseth2793
    @nehaseth2793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Interesting...Have not completed the video yet😅 but i know it is going to be interesting 😃

  • @Johan-yy9pk
    @Johan-yy9pk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing explanations sir, thanks

  • @RohitKumar-jv1is
    @RohitKumar-jv1is 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are great 🙏🙏

  • @gauravhasija83
    @gauravhasija83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nicely done video.🙏

  • @reidmortensen2629
    @reidmortensen2629 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If observer S1 was instead going in the same direction in velocity as the spaceship in question, and we agree that time dilates as we approach the speed of light, and we also agree that the speed of light is a universal constant; could we postulate that one could in fact proceed beyond the speed of light by maintaining that same velocity constant in a time dilation that also approaches the speed of light?
    I’m not sure how to properly word the question that I’m asking.
    Essentially this: if we exist at a speed approaching the speed of light, would we be able to tell since light behaves consistently in the dilation we exist in? And if not, could we use a relativistic speed in a specific frame of reference and then accelerate another object to a relativistic speed within that initial frame of reference? And if we could, would that object “slow down” or carry its time dilation with it? Somewhat of a supercavetation for space time, in theory?
    Forgive me if you’ve dealt with questions like this or if they come across underinformed.

  • @physicszoneshubham3478
    @physicszoneshubham3478 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect explanation sir

  • @PUBGgamer-kf5vz
    @PUBGgamer-kf5vz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video...
    Sir why sicronisation happen?

  • @aremijfaye5160
    @aremijfaye5160 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why is that in velocity composition law if ux'=-v ux is 0, and undefined (0/0) if ux=c and v=-c?

  • @aamid_riyaz
    @aamid_riyaz ปีที่แล้ว

    Instead of reinventing the wheel, we can exploit the fact that
    u’=γ (x-vt) and t’=γ (t-ξx) are parametric equations dependent on t s.t x’:t↦ x’(t) and t’:t↦ t’(t)
    Now, consider
    dx’/dt = (dx’/dt’)(dt’/dt) by chain rule
    If dt’/dt :≠ 0 on some interval, then dx’/dt’ = (dx’/dt)/(dt’/dt)
    Therefore dx’/dt’= u’= γ (u-v)/ γ (1-ξu) = (u-v)/ (1-ξu) where ξ = v/c^2 and u= u_sub(x)

  • @vanshtibrewal4791
    @vanshtibrewal4791 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️ best teacher

  • @RAJSINGH-hn8yq
    @RAJSINGH-hn8yq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u ❤️

  • @MsParticle
    @MsParticle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is a small error in the expressions of inverse velocity transformation for uy and uz shown at 15:18.
    Thanks for such very knowledgeable videos. Got to learn many things from your videos that are difficult and time consuming if one goes to books. Thanks and keep going :-)

  • @Ravi_477
    @Ravi_477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice sir

  • @markkennedy9767
    @markkennedy9767 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this.
    Around 9:00-9:30, I don't understand how the following has to be the case mathematically:
    If ∆t approaches zero when ∆t' approaches zero, then lim ∆x'/∆t' as ∆t approaches zero is equivalent to lim ∆x'/∆t' as ∆t' approaches zero.
    Why is this.
    I mean just because ∆t and ∆t' both approach zero, it doesn't mean that the limits above have to be the same, does it. If so, why would this be the case mathematically?
    Thanks.

  • @The_Spy__
    @The_Spy__ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are just awesome ❤️

  • @sbkarajan
    @sbkarajan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is good explanation of relative velocities, but how about the actual distances traveled?
    How does length contraction and time dilation for UFO A and B play here?

  • @student9226
    @student9226 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Sir,
    What will happen S' frame is moving in Y direction with velocity V

  • @TheViscweaver
    @TheViscweaver ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I am also from IIT Kanpur physics PG 1972 batch. I wish to share a GeoGebra file showing Graphic Relativistic addition of velocities. Sliders are included for your students to have hands on feel for changes in frame & object velocities. Nice work by you

  • @Ravi_477
    @Ravi_477 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks sir 🙏🙏

  • @sauravveedu5667
    @sauravveedu5667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @Imran52Feb
    @Imran52Feb ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the Space ships' velocities don't add 🤔, though it is true for light
    as per my understanding I.e, 2c is not possible . What happens in the Hadron Collider where v is close to c ? I'm confused. Please enlighten me.

  • @dharmvirsingh4277
    @dharmvirsingh4277 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir I have a question. Rocket A started from a point 10 crores km away from a goal at velocity of 2 lakh km/second another rocket B started at the same time from middle point at the velocity of 1 lakh km/second in linear direction.what will be their relatve speed as per special theory of relativity ? Will they reach at the goal simultaniously or not ?

  • @ugursoydan8187
    @ugursoydan8187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would be if we have done this proof with length contraction and time dilation? If we do this proof with that way we will find another result. In that case we would find an equation which says the relative velocity of the object from the referance frame of the other moving object is smaller than the velocity of the object from the referance frame of the standing (which has no velocity) object. this is a contradiction.

  • @Vikas-hs9cl
    @Vikas-hs9cl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Keep uploading

  • @doutormanhattan5680
    @doutormanhattan5680 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For instante, if we had this two objects going in opposite directions each with 100% of the speed of light, if we substitude in the transformation eqn, we will get u' = c.

  • @adityasingh4123
    @adityasingh4123 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir agr ap hindi mai pdate to pdne mai or bhi mja ata thanku so much sir

  • @shivamdellwork468
    @shivamdellwork468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doubt in problem solving section (16:14):Will it even yield the same result if I will attach s(prime/dash) frame with earth and s frame with a spaceship. I tried it but got wrong result. Ans in this scenario came out to be 0.72c

    • @shivamdellwork468
      @shivamdellwork468 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would be really grateful if anybody could explain this. Thanks in advance

  • @nader6632
    @nader6632 ปีที่แล้ว

    15:30
    the inverse transformation for y and z are written wrong😅

  • @jaanwarborris5848
    @jaanwarborris5848 ปีที่แล้ว

    When we derived Lorentz transformation, we assumed that the relative motion was happening only along x-dimension. Here however the object has a velocity component in all the three dimensions. Why are we using the same equations should we need not to derive a different set of equations for this case.

    • @arnavkumar5380
      @arnavkumar5380 ปีที่แล้ว

      But S' frame is moving with v in only x direction.

  • @doutormanhattan5680
    @doutormanhattan5680 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15:25 the right equations are not correct. They are not simetric.
    Anyway, you're great!

  • @shreeshdas4507
    @shreeshdas4507 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    op

  • @meyakabeli5300
    @meyakabeli5300 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😭😭😭Ha u ka sekama re ka oela.

  • @adityasingh4123
    @adityasingh4123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plz try to speak in hindi