See a couple 120h there? I’m currently trying to decide between the 80 and 100fs. Have the 40b and 70lcr right now, getting a tower next and putting the 40s in the back. How’s that 80 sounding? Would prefer it over the 100 for its size. But the 100 is so tempting, even if it is a little large for my living room. If I had a dedicated theater. 100f all the way.
first of all I’m New in HT, Music . 80 is smaller sound stage, BECAUSE of smaller woofers .otherwise it would be the same sound . and it less powerful.even subs can’t make it sounding bigger, size the problem . the 120H is will cheaper to go , because you don’t have to buy two REL subs , to have the same clean, deep base , of course with 100fs will be better and two RELs, but it will cost you 12k, this one all in one $8,300 on sale (120H).
@@alegotron Makes sense about the 80fs. Sounds like you would recommend the 100 over the 80? Really hard to tell from a TH-cam video, those 80s appeared to be working hard at -15. I already have a couple SVS subs. Did you return the 80s?
@@desmondc3000 No, I will keep it for surrounds, and 120H for front, 90C for Center , and I have Two REL HT series 15"-800RMS each. but for music better turn it off. if you have 12k go with 100, the svs subs ,not that good , compared to to the REL HT , I had svs 16 , it was enough to listen one song to hear different in sound quality. so I returned the svs 16. the bass from 120H is really like from REL- S series subs , you can’t get even close the same quality of bass from svs , that is why I’m preferred go with 120h , to avoid buying two RELs for 6k total plus 100s 6k, to get ‘almost the same’ sound quality like from 120H for $8,300 total.. 🤯
Paradigm以低音為主
See a couple 120h there? I’m currently trying to decide between the 80 and 100fs. Have the 40b and 70lcr right now, getting a tower next and putting the 40s in the back. How’s that 80 sounding? Would prefer it over the 100 for its size. But the 100 is so tempting, even if it is a little large for my living room. If I had a dedicated theater. 100f all the way.
first of all I’m New in HT, Music .
80 is smaller sound stage, BECAUSE of smaller woofers .otherwise it would be the same sound . and it less powerful.even subs can’t make it sounding bigger, size the problem .
the 120H is will cheaper to go , because you don’t have to buy two REL subs , to have the same clean, deep base , of course with 100fs will be better and two RELs, but it will cost you 12k, this one all in one $8,300 on sale (120H).
@@alegotron Makes sense about the 80fs. Sounds like you would recommend the 100 over the 80? Really hard to tell from a TH-cam video, those 80s appeared to be working hard at -15. I already have a couple SVS subs. Did you return the 80s?
@@desmondc3000
No, I will keep it for surrounds, and 120H for front, 90C for Center ,
and I have Two REL HT series 15"-800RMS each. but for music better turn it off.
if you have 12k go with 100, the svs subs ,not that good , compared to to the REL HT , I had svs 16 , it was enough to listen one song to hear different in sound quality.
so I returned the svs 16. the bass from 120H is really like from REL- S series subs , you can’t get even close the same quality of bass from svs , that is why I’m preferred go with 120h , to avoid buying two RELs for 6k total plus 100s 6k, to get ‘almost the same’ sound quality like from 120H for $8,300 total.. 🤯
@@desmondc3000 th-cam.com/video/aApUuKPTp8s/w-d-xo.htmlsi=nD9a_DLDegTGuunF
@@desmondc3000 th-cam.com/video/k0r4c0TGRk0/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EMMIROSWA519UclU
no subs.
Sounds better than 120h your video I think it’s for sub?