Ayodhya Judgment's Conclusions Not Matched By Its Reasons: Justice AK Ganguly
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- LiveLaw will redefine standards of legal journalism in the country and will strive to bring in more transparency in the legal eco system.
We bring you the latest legal news and updates from across India and beyond.
Stay updated. Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/2pskgB3
Support Us: bit.ly/35qFj6A
Visit Our Website: www.livelaw.in
Facebook: livelawindia
Twitter: livelawindia
Instagram: livelaw.in
Live Law app is India's fastest legal news app that will keep you updated on the latest law/legal news from India and across the world. Download now.
Android: bit.ly/2toaimp
iOS: apple.co/39dQ0vh
Most Honourable justice Ganguly deserves to extreme respect and admiration for exposing and analysing the true details upon the findings of the ridiculous and hypocritous judgement of the babri masjid demolition delivered by the supreme court of India by touching the various loopholes of our baised and capricious judicial set up..... Sir I salute to you for this deed..🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴🌹🌹🌹
Superb observation Bhai stay blessed ✊🏻
Thank you honourable supreme court judge a k ganguly for your valuable assessment
Really an eye opener about the subject ram temple issue... It get myself boasted that nature will do its course of action. Construction of temple by manipulating the facts is not an end.
This judgement is not judicial but an managed/influenced ORDER in favour of one section of society presently ruling the country ! It also violates the Constitution of India and the OATH OF OFFICE !!!
क्या न्यायालय के पास शक्ति है कि वह बाबर ने जो किया उसको दोष दे, यदि नहीं दे सकते तो उसके नाम पर जीने वाले लोगों को दे। शर्म आती है जस्टिस गांगुली जैसे लोगों पर
20 सालों तक यह मुकदमा चला आखिर क्यों नहीं आप मुसलमान के पक्ष में सबूत लेकर आ पाए, हिंदुओं ने मेहनत की सबूत जुटाए और अपनी जमीन को वापस पाया जो कि मुसलमानों ने छीन रखी थी अब आप मेहनत करो सबूत लेकर आओ दरअसल आपके पास नाटक थे ना कोई विषय सिर्फ और सिर्फ झूठ बोलना जानते हैं आप जैसे लोग।
Outstanding sir. I wish to know 1% of your knowledge of Law and il be held greatest.
Great sir
This is call a secular judge.....great sir
Well people have legitimate right to differ on judgements but please dont ascribe motives. Lets take the 2 G judgement....the one co authored by Ganguly J and delivered on the day of his retirement...many have said the judgement was not correct .... further all the licenses were cancelled by the perpetrators of the so called scam were absolved by CBI court.... further after the said judgement.... Telecom industry jus sort of collapsed resulting in closure of so many companies, job losses in Thousands, mounting bad debts for banks....and no substantial money recovery .... in the hindsight it might seem the 2 G judgement indirectlly benefitted some entity....or for tat matter a particular political party to a great extent.... so
its very important to be objective and rational... when we r discussing any issue and more so a judgement....
We are seeing how courts have become.....Sensational Judgements are being delivered. What all had been made by Indians is being destroyed by leftovers. But Indians are awakung bcos Right always Remains a RIGHT..JaiHind
FOR THOSE WHO SUPPORT THE JUDGEMENT IT IS A MATTER OF BOOSTING THEIR EGO AGAINST DEEP GUILT THAT WILL SURFACE IN THE NEAR FUTURE HAUNTING THEM. THEY WILL SURELY PRAISE THE COMMENDABLE WORK DONE BY THOSE IN GOVERNMENT. IT IS MORE LIKE REGRETTING THE KIDNAPPING OF SITA MATA AND YET COMMENDING THE GUTS OF RAVANA. IS THIS THE WAY TO LIVE ?
The order portion was written by Amit Shah under the dictation of Narendra Modi, which was edited by LK Advani and finally read by the old man Gogoi.
Debates on PIL N0 224 0f 2017 refused on 10.07.2017 by chief Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar now retired and Justice Dy.Chandra chur now chief Justice by misuse of judiciary Independency overreach unbridled power unaccompanied by liability
Who appoint him as a judge ?
Tumhara baap
He is A.N. Ray but sasta wala (version 2.0 😂)
Are you even listening to the words
Your preffering to the report of waqf bord , tell me how the members are waqf bord appointed by whom and for whose favour are they , indian society or muslims in particularly ? , Isn't it bias ,
2) you said that our colonial fathers secured the worship and rights of minorities ! What a joke , so why wouldn't they did it in other colonies , India is the only country which even after independence , keep on boot licking to their colonial fathers !!!
3) As supreme court stated the offering of namaz in the maszid isn't one of necessary practice is true as no such supportive argument was provided by studying the practice of islamic religious in islamic countries itself