Aleksei Aksimentiev, "Nanopore Sequencing of DNA"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @sibelozturk8919
    @sibelozturk8919 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for sharing! It's fascinating!

  • @asgharalisabri2845
    @asgharalisabri2845 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    very nice presentation about the sequencing of DNA through nanopore.

  • @khurshedakabirov8671
    @khurshedakabirov8671 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does heating solution has any affect on RPS measurement? It may extend the DNA molecule, but doesn't it de-shape the pore at the same time?

  • @MuntasirRahman
    @MuntasirRahman 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting lecture on nanopore sequencing technology!

  • @AlexOotzaAkaSharpy
    @AlexOotzaAkaSharpy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you make those animations of the nanopore please tell me what software!

  • @tophat2115
    @tophat2115 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    If an atom of a different element than what is customary appears in the DNA strand, how would the nanapore sequencer react? Would it classify it as the correct element?

    • @fastluuk
      @fastluuk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think each nucleotide has a distinct electrical signature, and the sequencer compares the signature of the nucleotide passing through the pore to a reference database to identify it. If the electrical signature is not found in the databse, the nanopore sequencer will give an error. So to answer your question, I think the nanopore sequencer would classify an atom of a different element than what is customary appears in the DNA strand as an incorrect element.

  • @TheFallibleFiend
    @TheFallibleFiend 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How are the motion graphics of the DNA through the nanopore produced? Are those simulations? Or are they result of some kind of representation of actual data? Something else?

    • @BRYANT9024KOBE
      @BRYANT9024KOBE 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Fallible Fiend sitimulaion

    • @kropotkln
      @kropotkln 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the current decade, molecular simulations are *themselves* the "representation of actual data." Molecular biologists are getting really, REALLY good at molecular biology and computers are speeding up this progress exponentially.

  • @infernaldancer
    @infernaldancer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing!