Being Doggone Insistent
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
- The plaintiff claims the defendant stole her three loving dogs and won’t give them back. She’s heartbroken and is suing the defendant for the value of her kidnapped dogs. The defendant insists she took in the dogs out of the goodness of her heart because the plaintiff lost her home, so they’re her dogs now.
Case #25317
#PeoplesCourt #RealityTV #Court
I can NOT stand the defendant. Let me speak in a soft, victimized voice and you’ll believe me 🙄
The Amber Heard effect! Poor me, i’m the victim here!
I thought she was going to start crying
totally. she is the one who is bi-polar.
She was so annoying.. literally whined every word 🙄
She's high.
The plaintiff was so happy she got her dogs back!!! The defendant was talking in a circle! Nothing made sense! Glad the plaintiff got her dogs back!
The defendant was pissing me off,
trying to whine her way through that case,
she knew she had no evidence. I love JM, knew right from the beginning the defendant was lying
Yeah, when she had to try to prove she's a good person from the get go, calling the other person crazy... and have no evidence, you figure she's lying. I fostered a dog for a day and was attached but he wasn't going to work in my home with my other dog, so I had to take him back. I understand getting attached. But, dogs are property and nothing outdoes the law.
She should've sued her az for defamation, calling her crazy n what not. I've been binge watching these court cases and in aw of how crazy ppl really are in this world 😩
pissed me offf real bad
@@shannontrent3702 attached after a day? Get a grip
Baffled . The defendant seems like one of those people who lives in their own world and believes her own lies😅
And a number of them do, has a relation that did that to her sisters and brothers for many years. It came back on her.
don't do drugs, ladies
Unbelievable how many people are just running around in their own alternate reality
Wow this woman seems very reasonable. She was willing to pay PLUS food cost. And she quickly got a place, the defendant is horrible.
The plaintiff never did prove that she paid the $200 for the first month or did I miss it?
@@Gromble_Sir The defendant didn’t counter sue.
Did she pay though?
@@cypherknot yea because regardless of there was a counter suit, if the plaintiff didn't pay for the services wouldn't that be a breach?
Abandoned pet. What’s her TH-cam channel?
Omg the voice the defendant was putting on was driving me crazy!! Does she not realise that victim voice made it more obvious that she was lying?!?!! It was clear that hubby had a slightly harder time lying than she did and he should be concerned about how easily she can lie about something so serious and immoral! Although, given the fact that he was there, by her side, with the intention to lie, makes him just as pathetic and deceiving as his wife!
👏🏼 I agree..Smh.
“and, by the way, that’s not my ex-boyfriend; that’s a stalker” TOOK ME OUT
Couldn't let it slide lol
harvey: oh you have a stalker? cool. So anyway--
Why in the world do ppl feel like they can come to court and make claims without any evidence?! 🤦🏾♀️
Uh, @Miss Oliver, are you talking about the Plaintiff or defendant, for the defendant lost.
@@trekgirl65 The plaintiff had all the evidence she needed to get her dogs back (the text messages describing the agreement). The defendant didn't have any proof (of what she was saying) that:
- The plaintiff is scamming people
- Didn't want the dogs back
- Was changing the story
- Didn't pay 200 bucks.
It was on the defendant to provide the proof to counter the plaintiffs claims as well as proof that would prove her own claims. Instead she apparently thought that saying "trust me, I don't lie" is proof.
The defendant seems to be making it up as she goes along.
I am very glad for the plaintiff. She clearly loved those dogs.
At least the husband told the truth. Really helped the plaintiff.
He probably didn't want they to begin with. Lol
@@Eyeofthemourning exactly! Lol
Lol yup
🤦🏾♀️🤣
@opalex worst TV judge, yawn
I'm loving the no nonsense way JM dealt with the defendant! The defendant was clearly not being honest.
The husband looks mortified... LOL
Judge went in on the defendant 😂
Defendant is a nasty LIAR‼️🤮
I think the person who was attempting to steal this woman’s dogs has mental health issues!
I agree
That's the thing too, she was trying to say the plaintiff was bipolar and put her through so much and all the while she's really the one trying to steal the dogs. She saw someone going through a hard time in their life and wanted to just take the dog Thinking well they won't do anything
Man for real. The way she was talking and trying to make herself out to be the victim was just weird altogether
I agree!!!!
Yep it’s called projection
I’m glad she’ll get her dogs back. The defendant thinks she’s slick.
I’m sooooo glad she got her dogs back ❤🎉
What a horrible person that defendant is. Clearly, she ask you to temporarily house them. Your character, is the one that is poor!
The fact that the defendant sent in “risqué” videos as evidence is insane. I’m glad the judge responded how she did about that.
Me too! I’m really impressed with how the judge handled this case. She told the woman off, but did so respectfully. She had 0 evidence. I really liked when judge said people who are homeless can have dogs and the risqué photo comment. This woman clearly felt like she was better and got attached. Don’t foster dogs if you’ll get attached, I especially wouldn’t foster if I had young kids in the house bc that’s hard for them. I found a stray a few years back, looked online and saw a post for someone trying to get rid of the same dog. My neighbor/friend ended up messaging them saying I found it. It was late at night, local pound wasn’t open but I had called to report I found the dog. These people started blowing up mine and my sisters Facebook, threatening to come fight us over this dog that just the day before they wanted to get rid of. It clearly looked like they had dropped this dog off in my neighborhood, he was found in the back of a parking lot right out of the woods. Very suspicious. I never told these people I was keeping their dog, all I told them was I’d spoken to animal control and was told to bring the dog in the next morning and they could pick their dog up there. I told animal control about the suspicious behavior, the aggressive fb messages and please let us know if the dog was still available after the stray hold bc we would be interested. The “owners” had started to say they couldn’t prove ownership bc they’re trans and got the dog with their old name and now it doesn’t match their ID and all this stuff. It was drama after drama. I do miss that dog, she was adorable and so well behaved, but I would never feel right just keeping a dog I found on the street. Morally I had to do it the right way and let animal control deal with it and follow up if they thought the owners weren’t capable.
Hahah me three, I take “risqué” videos too and if a judge turned around and was like, “that’s why you don’t deserve your cat!!” I would be so beyond disturbed.
@@LeeoGoneWild Exactly! I hate when people are wrong and try to shame or embarrass someone else. Take your pics, boo! Lol
@@Sara-xk1ns Wow! What a dilemma! I’m just like you, I wouldn’t have felt right keeping the dog but why dump the dog and still try to sell it?? Omg. Sorry, you even got mixed up in that. And good idea going to the pound. Let them prove it however they need to.
@@MC-ex2gs hahah the attempt at shaming others is hilarious. Some people like hiking, fishing, nature and take a billion pictures of it because they like it. I like to dance to sexy music and what i like to do, I put it on MY social media accounts, which are about ME. I’m glad you get it though!
That dog-stealer is embarrassingly bad at lying. 😖
Talk about a Craig’s list creeper. She literally strategized on getting free dogs
Yikes. You're right 😮😢😢
Ugh, that people deliberately thrive on creepy behavior and when called out, it's never them..."I'm the victim, your honor".
The fact that you could hear the plaintiffs voice started shaking as soon as she heard she's getting her dogs back proves that she loves them.
The fact that the defendant saw this as an experience where she only lost a lot of money proves that she didn't care about the dogs at all.
I really hope the plaintiff got her dogs back in one piece.
And the way she and her husband hugged and kissed after the verdict showed that the dogs are family to them. They love them and they deserve to get them back.
Lets hope no one deals with the defendant AGAIN!
If she never was paid then why didn't she counter sue?
Because she probably figured the plaintiff had evidence lol because she’s lying
Didn't ya love how she couldn't prove a single claim she made? 😂
Habitual liar but not at all convincing 😂😂😂
Happy the dogs were returned safely❤️
The defendant is a liar
Even the defendant's husband started to admit that he overheard that the plaintiff didn't know 'when' she would be coming back. The plaintiff dragged her husband into her lie, poor man...
@arianefr78, your comment did not make since, since it was the defendant's husband who stopped lying for the defendant. Not the plaintiff.
the defendant, purple hair gal, blatantly lied throughout. Nothing she said was solid. Just very entitled and manipulative.
If the plaintiff actually was 'bipolar' and saying two completely different things, there should be evidence of that from the defendant in text!
That’s not what bipolar means at all, though
@@nerdalieisasleepyhead104 my point exactly
if people are so emotionally fragile and get attached to animal so quick, they should state that before taking the dogs, or refuse taking care of other ppl's dogs.. it's a lame excuse to keep dogs... this shouldn't have gone that far, its wasting resources that arent in place for emotionally damaged people.
I think the defendant saw dollar signs and wasn't thinking about her children getting attached. She knew she was going to keep those dogs, just didn't think she'd be in court over them. She's awful.
I think the Defendant was Barking up the Wrong Tree !! 🤣
Punny
She definitely wasn’t the cat’s meow
Now she knew better then to try to keep that ladies dogs,smh
The defendant is the crazy one. Just listen to how she talks; it’s so emotionless. She sounds like a serious psychopath.
Lets say everything the defendant said was true. That the plaintiff called her and said that she was in a awful place and gave the dogs to them.
While legally they'd have a case, but just morally, if the plaintiff's life is back in order, why not give the dogs back to her? Not only out of karma, but out of a sense of not taking advantage of someone who was in a bad place at one point in their life
This is my exact thought.💯💯
because scum like the defendant don't care that someone has been through a dark place in their life, She sees it as a good time to take advantage of someone that is just getting back on their feet and pulling out of that dark place..
I’d only agree with the defendant if it had been a year or more. At that point she’s been with the dogs far longer (excluding the senior since that started in that family anyway). But that’s not this case.
Agreed !
Just gross....that defendant is awful and only cares about herself and manipulates her way through life. She hunts down people on FB to try and hurt others. I felt so terrible for the plaintiff, it seemed she went through hell for awhile and finally got her footing back, shame on that woman.
I didn't consider that about FB but great point 👍💯 zero proof, "ex bf said"
JJ would have yelled at her "that's hearsay!"
You out here adopting dogs but can’t pay rent . Wtf
People have screwed up priorities
She should've brought her evidence no excuses 💯
I love the young man in the crowd outside. He's happy to be there. Wherever he is, happy to be alive.
Awesome dude!
I just wish you to know I noticed you.
Defendant can’t give oneeee specific example of the alleged scams? She’s a terrible liar.
Horrible to keep someone else’s dog
theft.
She tried to steal her dogs!!!!! 😆 the lady came back in the timeframe she agreed to and wanted her dogs back.
Even if at some point she said she didn’t know how she would do it she did it. GIVE HER THE DOGS they are her dogs.
Even if you thought the conversation meant you could keep them when you realized you miss understood her GIVE them back.
She didn’t even want the one dog till it was returned with bonus puppies.
They had me at doggone
I feel for the husband.. u know it was a long drive home..lmao.
The defendant is such a horrible person! Glad the judge ruled in the plaintiff's favor and she got her dogs back. It's clear from the evidence it was a temporary arrangement.
The defendant looked sooo guilty. 😂
And a bum too
Judge Milian made the right call again
You think so David Ellis 🤔🤔😳😳😳😳
As soon as defendant started talking, I knew she was going to lie. The soft "believe me, I'm a victim" voice made it crystal clear.
Me too.
the defendant at the end was the one talking about money. Disgusting human being. I am so happy the plaintiff got her dogs back.
Y’all would’ve been seeing me on a different court show had I been the plaintiff.
Law & Order SDU, Special Dog Unit?
Girl yes!!
Liars club ?
Liar liar ! The defendant
The defendant might be on some drugs. She is talking and slurring. So odd. Glad dogs Back with the owner.
The husband is so CLEARLY coached!!!
What’s sad is this awful woman got her kids MORE attached to the dogs by dragging out this process. Just return the dogs you lying thief.
The defendant is a flat out liar and a horrible person... she absolutely stole those dogs and is bad at that too
Pets are legally seen as property, but if we were talking about the plaintiff’s clothes we wouldn’t be here. (The defendant got attached) At the very best the defendant would be owed money (for her troubles) but wouldn’t be able to keep the dogs, no less someone’s clothes 😂
Is the defendant on something? She’s slurring her speech.
I LOVE LOVE LOVE when the judge doesn't just call obvious liars out, but acts like she believes them and tells them to show her the "fake" evidence they pretend to have LOL.
I’m glad I’m not the only one that hates the defendant.
When I tell you I would be in jail because I would have done anything to get my dogs back. We wouldn’t have made it to court.
Same
But I would never leave my dogs with a stranger anyway
life is a BITCH sometimes@@mamathemeat
Another dog episode..give that lady her dogs back just trying to strong-arm her for her dogs..lol the plaintiff got risqué videos up
Gross. Lol
Defendant 👎
She should be locked up for stealing those animals. Wow, sick people in this world.
Defendant is the scammer, she actually speaks to an ex-boyfriend for mud to use in court😂😂😂
Somebody seems very high, but if that's really how she presents then oh my...
The defendant is a horrible person. Just humoring her defense... if she ONLY kept the dogs because the plaintiff said to, and she already had dogs, the kids weren't attached, she couldn't afford them, then why the hell wouldn't she give them back when the plaintiff was begging for them, then taking her to court?! Oh, that's right, because she's a lying thief!
I have cared for dogs professionally (sometimes for up to 3 months), fostered dogs, rehabilitated dogs, and YES, you bond, you love the, like your own, and it's hard as hell to say good bye, but that is what you do, send them HOME to their owners! Damn, every call I get about one of "my bonus hounds" passing away, I bawl and grieve like my own, I'm dedicated to them, but that doesn't give me the right to STEAL them. The ignorance, audacity and pure shitiness of the defendant is pathetic.
Bless your heart. I had to rehome a puppy recently due to legal reasons (only allowed 3 dogs, he was the 4th) it was hard. However, I found him a great home and he is doing well. Doing it all the time like you, I'm not sure I could do it. I get attached to the feral cats outside. Lol
@@ButtonsCasey I’m SO sorry. What you did is so hard, but it’s selfless and the right thing to do at times.
It’s not easy, I’ve had to take breaks from foster for that very reason. I’ve had 3 “foster flops”, ones I fell in love with and no home was “good enough”, ie. the other homes weren’t with me. Lol I just remind myself I’m their recuperation, their healing place before finding their forever home. Dang furry little cuties own my heart.
Seems to me that the defendant felt she made a mistake by selling her dog the first time and when the plaintiff allowed her to babysit the dog she decided she wasn't going to give the dog to the plaintiff again like she did the first time.
Maybe have your home life stable before taking on responsibility of dogs
Having gone through this personally myself I am so glad the plaintiff got the dogs back, but I wish we had follow up videos showing that they did follow through with the order. Especially since both parties are paid to appear on the show.
She took those dogs in good faith that it would be TEMPORARY.
Ugghhhh. That defendant just irked me with her voice. U can clearly see that she lied
Defendant lies like a 10 year old. The lady had texts and she had nothing. She gave he fathers dog away but for a price $ 100 but now her kids are attached to all three? She sold a sick older dog , the dog and two others come back and her kids got attached and now she’s making stories up. Either that or she sold them all on Craig’s list. Tell me plaintiff isn’t from New York, love her accent
you dont have a place to stay but you got 3 dogs. get your life in order
The Defendant is Messy! Who is the real Scammer?
She's never gonna be dealing with the plaintiff again??? Oh dear!!! How will the plaintiff EVER live with herself?!?!?!😱😱😱
I LOVED the ending to this one
the defendant has NO LEGAL RIGHT to keep the dogs she offered to FOSTER.
This defendant...whew😒
Whew the defendant was projecting...wow.
The defendants husband looks like he's old enough to be her grandfather 🤣
The Hamburglar lost the case. Wah wah!
The Defendant is all talk and no evidence!
Breeders?? Heaven forbid they adopt and bring evicted too
If dependent was so attached to her dad's dog she shouldn't have got rid of it in first place.
There is no way the defendant talks like that all day everyday . What was going on with her neck? She came across as if she was hiding the real her,she was trying to present herself like a saint and I don't believe one bit.
A very similar thing happened to me several years ago I was a personal driver for a very wealthy family I would take the dogs in the limousine to the caretaker which is about 5 miles away.
Upon arrival back into town I dropped off my employers and took the limousine to go pick up the dogs and the caretaker decided she did not wanna give them back. She blamed it on me and stated didn’t want to take them which was completely absurd she tried everything she could to keep those dogs until we had a “family friend” go take care of the situation.
Wtf does bipolar have to do with anything?
I know.
I see the real story, the defendant seen the plaintiff moving in with three well-cared for dogs, got jealous and found a way to get the dogs. Waited for the great opportunity and stole the dogs. Refused to return what was not hers to keep. And husband was no longer going to lie for his lying wife no more.
The defendant is ridiculous! Give me back my dogs trick!
She stole dogs and says the plaintiff has mental problems???? Talk about glass houses.
I hate when others try to label someone as having mental issues. Lady worry about your own mental state and give the lady her dogs back.
I’m 5:33 into the episode and I’m overly irritated by the way the defendant. Her voice, the way she’s talking, the way she’s moving her mouth when she speaks 🙅🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🙅🏾♀️😂
😣😖😣😖😣😖
I fall in love with every rescue dog I foster too but it doesn’t give me the right to keep them when they have been committed to a rescue who is paying for all their care 🤦🏼♀️
The defendant was annoying the F out of me with that voice
"I'm not interested in money."
Later: "I lost a lot of money!!!"😭😭😭
If your getting evicted, why in the world would you have dogs you can’t afford.
That part
maybe she had the dogs before she got evicted. it's not like she went out to buy dogs as eviction presents to herself.
👍
I love the plaintiffs accent lol she sound like around away girl from Brooklyn. Like Rosie Perez
No money and can't afford to keep a roof over her kids head but gets 3 dogs.. Humans can be such idiots .
Did they just refer to plaintiff's children as dogs as in, " how many do you have?"
It was horrible I tell you, horrible!!
-Give me one example of horrible.
Errrmm, ... She's horrible?!?
The defendant is so sickening. She can’t take care of herself, I highly doubt she’s great at taking care of three dogs. The voice is absolutely nauseating.