ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Biggest gun in the world*

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ส.ค. 2024
  • *This gun was far and away the biggest gun when it was made. The exact barrel weight is 103.64 tons, and the carriage it sits on is another 46.82. It is definitely the biggest ever muzzle-loader. There were other big guns, beach-loaders such as those on the Yamamoto battleship, or the German Schwerer Gustav railway gun, but these don't count because they have either been destroyed or sent to the bottom of the sea. Other later railway guns, some of which survive at least in part, were built that sat on massive railway carriages, and these weighed more.
    Subscribe to my channel: www.youtube.co...
    Support me on Patreon: / lindybeige
    More weapons and armour videos here: • Weapons and armour
    In Fort Rinella. Kalkara, Malta, there is one of the world's two surviving Armtrong Whitworth 100-ton guns. The barrel weighed 100 tons, and fired a one-ton shell to the horizon, where it could penetrate the armour of any ship. At five miles it had a hit rate of 98%. The crew was never exposed to enemy fire when it was in operation, as it swivelled this way and that for loading on hydraulics. Today, its fire rate of one round every six minutes makes it obsolete, but in its day, this was terrifyingly fast for so vast a weapon.
    The gun is not complete. Its loading mechanism was broken up for scrap, and the smaller bits that could be removed from the gun have gone, but the enormous bulk of its main sections are still there. It has been fired once in recent years by re-enactors, but just to create smoke, flame, and publicity.
    As I myself pointed out while I was there, before making the same lazy mistake on camera, the shell did not carry one ton of explosives inside it. The shell in its entirety including the explosives weighed one ton. It was a one-ton bomb, however, and the hardness of the shell contributed to the force of the concussion.
    The shell was propelled from the barrel by 450lbs of gunpowder. Local huntsmen would wait nearby during test-fires and recover unburned bits of powder scattered in front of the gun.
    See also: www.fortrinella...
    Lindybeige: a channel of archaeology, ancient and medieval warfare, rants, swing dance, travelogues, evolution, and whatever else occurs to me to make.
    Picture credits:
    "Rockbuster-front" by Julo - Own work. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons - commons.wikimed...
    "Duilio 1880 002". Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons - commons.wikimed...
    ▼ Follow me...
    Twitter: / lindybeige I may have some drivel to contribute to the Twittersphere, plus you get notice of uploads.
    Facebook: / lindybeige (it's a 'page' and now seems to be working).
    Google+: "google.com/+lindybeige"
    website: www.LloydianAspects.co.uk
    Biggest gun in the world*
    / user "Lindybeige"

ความคิดเห็น • 2.7K

  • @kuiper921
    @kuiper921 7 ปีที่แล้ว +811

    For the people talking about guns such as the Schwere Gustav being bigger, that is true. He did however have a disclamer that says that it is the biggest surviving.

    • @b8m8wuts46
      @b8m8wuts46 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kuiper he didnt say that

    • @droopsnoot1
      @droopsnoot1 7 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      +B8m8 Wuts
      ...Yes he did. Read the description

    • @capitalistsmashingswjguy2936
      @capitalistsmashingswjguy2936 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Michael Yu one of those gun has survived if my sources arent b shit

    • @AdstarAPAD
      @AdstarAPAD 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The you should be able to give evidence of it today..

    • @capitalistsmashingswjguy2936
      @capitalistsmashingswjguy2936 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      My source was post on youtube dont ask wich because i forgot

  • @danielweis1572
    @danielweis1572 7 ปีที่แล้ว +537

    Ah Malta home to beautiful gardens, clearwater bays and a 100 ton gun.

    • @cantevengetdental2422
      @cantevengetdental2422 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      The gun is what keeps the bays clear.

    • @baddog5936
      @baddog5936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And some of the finest looking girls. Mmmm mmmm

    • @sethl.lazarus6642
      @sethl.lazarus6642 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I come from Malta and I heavily disagree, beautiful gardens are constantly covered in concrete or dog shit. Clearwater bays are a joke because there is only one (if it still exists) that is truly natural, the rest are filthy. The worst part? The country is corrupt to high hell. I've lived in Malta for a good 12 years until 3 years ago, and it was always a trash heap. Don't know about you but all I can say is your critically wrong. Except for the 100 ton gun...shooting bullshit to shower the Maltese media.

    • @sethl.lazarus6642
      @sethl.lazarus6642 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@baddog5936 HAHAHAHA...nope fam. Some may look good, but they tend to be gold diggers and they ain't loyal. The rest aren't pretty whatsoever and the sad part is they have no redeeming qualities.

    • @I_like_big_bombs
      @I_like_big_bombs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Malta has declared war upon your nation, may god save you now.

  • @andewhousley2993
    @andewhousley2993 7 ปีที่แล้ว +404

    I love how the gun has camo on it like they are going to hide that thing

    • @sumvs5992
      @sumvs5992 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Well you can't see it's black carriage, so at 8 miles away, you could probably not distinguish its shape from the surrounding sandy coloured houses.

    • @justaguywhoplaysfalloutsom1104
      @justaguywhoplaysfalloutsom1104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The paint also probably helps prevent erosion from the sea.

    • @earthy8684
      @earthy8684 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      what gun thought

    • @JohnMiller-zr8pl
      @JohnMiller-zr8pl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Better that shinny reflective metal under the sun

    • @raphaelventura2997
      @raphaelventura2997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What Sumvs said, and a way so that aircrafts probably can not see it clearly when looking down below, or looking at their scopes, I think

  • @BastuGubbar
    @BastuGubbar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +647

    2:38 top 5 rappers eminem was too scared to face.

  • @stefanfrunza1697
    @stefanfrunza1697 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2219

    What type of permit do you need to open carry that gun.

    • @quorthonsinferno5119
      @quorthonsinferno5119 7 ปีที่แล้ว +223

      Stefan Frunza You don't need one, you just need to be the hulk, that's your permit

    • @itsabuscus1619
      @itsabuscus1619 7 ปีที่แล้ว +187

      Kvarnholmen if you can lift it do you even need a gun??

    • @SirConto
      @SirConto 7 ปีที่แล้ว +149

      If you walk around with it, I don't think anyone will complain to you about it.

    • @geckoo9190
      @geckoo9190 7 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      A permit from a doctor I guess... and a psichologist.

    • @drops2cents260
      @drops2cents260 7 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      +Stefan Frunza
      > What type of permit do you need to open carry that gun.
      A Class C drivers license with CDL endorsements H or X (probably L as well), I suppose? :-)

  • @RocketLR
    @RocketLR 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1509

    My new favorite quote - "if you were an enemy ship, and this saw you and got angry. You'd have to get to terms with NOT being an enemy ship, for very much longer."

    • @justinanderson267
      @justinanderson267 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Very Douglas Addams-y. I liked it too lol

    • @DieFlabbergast
      @DieFlabbergast 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Not necessarily true. As you may have noticed, ships move - quite fast when you're trying to retrain the barrel of a monster like this. They're not just going to sit there and let themselves be hit. A couple of fast destroyers could easily appear over the horizon and zigzag toward this gun emplacement, firing as they came: they'd have a good chance of putting it out of action before the bigger, slower ships moved past within range. I think there's a good reason why more such monsters were _not_ deployed by the coastal batteries of the world. Smaller, more quickly re-aimable guns would be much more effective.

    • @dparsons343
      @dparsons343 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That line was absolute gold

    • @anonymousdolan4862
      @anonymousdolan4862 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      BULLSHIT it can't even penetrate the fucking Arizona since it launches spherical projectiles and if you're looking for the strongest gun then go for the Yamato 460mm cannons or even the fucking Gustav super railway gun or if you're going for barrel size then the KARL GERRAT IS YOUR BEST CHOICE!!!!!! NOT BIAS FYI BUT FUCKING FACTS

    • @anonymousdolan4862
      @anonymousdolan4862 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Communist space bears Bloody correct

  • @quator7346
    @quator7346 5 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    2:38 Love him or hate him, he's spittin' straight facts.

  • @dirkdiggler8769
    @dirkdiggler8769 5 ปีที่แล้ว +339

    7 times the salary of a soldier? Bargain.
    A Tomahawk cruise missile costs $1.5m.

    • @cantevengetdental2422
      @cantevengetdental2422 5 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      So one of these bullets is only around 175k? That sounds reasonable considering what it's sinking...

    • @matiasnatale2808
      @matiasnatale2808 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The british were stingy

    • @carmenfarrugiabonello4605
      @carmenfarrugiabonello4605 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      average politicians salary !

    • @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet
      @theyonlycomeoutwhenitsquiet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      As it was said in Leo Murray’s Brains and Bullets, when every missile costs the same as a new Porsche, it seems a waste to think they might not be killing anybody.

    • @anonym3
      @anonym3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      B2 bomber:"hey buddy you see this little thing there?"
      SR-71:"sweet."

  • @061342
    @061342 9 ปีที่แล้ว +579

    I wonder if this gun is banned in California?

    • @MrMakabar
      @MrMakabar 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Invisible Camel wasn't Gerald Bull playing around with his big gun in California? That little baby could should into space, literally.

    • @killercour
      @killercour 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ***** wut?

    • @nthedecent7717
      @nthedecent7717 9 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Invisible Camel
      It's commiefornia, I wouldn't be surprised if big kitchen knives were banned.

    • @farmerboy916
      @farmerboy916 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Actually, I don't think it would be. After all, it's just a muzzleloading cannon; it's even pre-1898. Well, the explosive shell might be; good luck getting the shells past the feds anyway, they have to approve explosive shells with more than I think an ounce of explosives, and you have to pay for a tax stamp for each shell.

    • @billybobjoe4006
      @billybobjoe4006 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I dunno if they are regulated in California. But they sure as hell aren't in Nevada.

  • @lbochtler
    @lbochtler 9 ปีที่แล้ว +625

    Thats one impressive gun, but its not the largest. The largest i know of is the Schwerer Gustav. It fired 7 Tone shells an impresive 39km from a 32.5 meter barrel. It was however a gun from WW2, and it was a railway gun.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +498

      ***** It doesn't exist any more.

    • @lbochtler
      @lbochtler 9 ปีที่แล้ว +100

      Lindybeige True, but it was still a bigger gun.

    • @petrolak
      @petrolak 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Lindybeige what about HARP project gun on Barbados? it's still there

    • @Akm72
      @Akm72 9 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Lindybeige Some of the Iowa class battleships are still in existence as museum ships. Their 16"/50 guns weigh almost 120 tons (that's proper imperial tons not weak willed, effeminate metric tonnes or crappy little American short tons) and they could fire a 2700 lb Mk. 8 AP projectile (that's over 1.2 tons) or later a Nuclear Mk. 23 shell with a yield of about 15 to 20 kt. I think that beats these, admittedly impressive, Armstrong 100 ton guns in most regards except caliber.

    • @lbochtler
      @lbochtler 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      unipetrolak good point its also a very massive gun, especially with the 410mm barrel diameter. and 40meter barrel length.

  • @GoofballPaul
    @GoofballPaul 6 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    2:40 I only understood *"THE LITTEL HOLS"*

    • @jasonisbored6679
      @jasonisbored6679 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think that’s “the little hose”

    • @bearynice4340
      @bearynice4340 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I thought it said lederhosen

  • @laps_san8505
    @laps_san8505 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    2:06 Laughed myself to bits😂😂😂

  • @prinselijkcoder
    @prinselijkcoder 9 ปีที่แล้ว +306

    I first read this as "Beigest gun in the world".

    • @Mantis47
      @Mantis47 9 ปีที่แล้ว +123

      Prinselijk Coder To be fair, as guns go, this one is pretty beige.

    • @Brian-bp5pe
      @Brian-bp5pe 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mantis47, it is beige, isn't it? Looks beige to me.
      BJP

    • @unclejoeoakland
      @unclejoeoakland 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Prinselijk Coder he should reload it in that name...

  • @lindybeige
    @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2198

    First!

    • @Daestos
      @Daestos 9 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Darn! The man himself beat me to it!

    • @damanorelse
      @damanorelse 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lindybeige It reminds me of the short film "Cannon Fodder", especially with the description that Belgian guy gives.

    • @TheBadbro12
      @TheBadbro12 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Lindybeige What about the German "Schwerer Gustav"

    • @peridoodle2644
      @peridoodle2644 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      TheBadbro12 Did you not see the "surviving, by weight" note in the video? You may want to pay better attention.

    • @paulwalsh7134
      @paulwalsh7134 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** I didn't see that note either. So thankyou.

  • @sirghostington6305
    @sirghostington6305 5 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    "am I ordering an artillery strike or a meteor to go?"

  • @xavierh.5102
    @xavierh.5102 7 ปีที่แล้ว +321

    hey look at me, I'm so smart, I said it wasn't the biggest gun in the world. too bad I'm not smart enough to read the description or the disclaimer at the bottom of the screen literally right in the beginning of the video.

  • @jaymanrider3491
    @jaymanrider3491 7 ปีที่แล้ว +506

    Someone please remix that guy spitting them fat instructions at 2:40

    • @Ridi_MB
      @Ridi_MB 7 ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Rap god.

    • @Thy_Guardian
      @Thy_Guardian 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Need to be a meme

    • @heyfellow1715
      @heyfellow1715 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      saw him irl so funny

  • @FartMaster69
    @FartMaster69 9 ปีที่แล้ว +309

    Got the biggest guns in the world right here, ladies

    • @VebbGames
      @VebbGames 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** Never thought id see a joke about that.

    • @stephanjacob17
      @stephanjacob17 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      FartMaster69 your butt cheeks?

    • @FartMaster69
      @FartMaster69 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *****
      pow pow

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      FartMaster69
      boom
      boom
      _firepower_

    • @gigimilano6757
      @gigimilano6757 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thats not a gustav :/ only 1 was built and destroyed and thats in the vid is not the biggest gun.....

  • @gazelle1467
    @gazelle1467 5 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    "You'd have to get to terms with not being an enemy ship for very much longer" I just love your humour so much

  • @ShokkuKyushu
    @ShokkuKyushu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The world's largest surviving gun is the 18 inch 47 caliber gun Mark A at Dahlgren Naval Weapons Facility in Virginia, it weighs 180 metric tons. There were also larger black powder guns(17 inch breech loading cannons for the italian battleships Italia and Lepanto) but this is the largest muzzle loading cannon ever built.

  • @elektro3000
    @elektro3000 8 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    If some poor bastard had to fire that gun manually and hide in that alcove in the wall, was he provided with the world's fluffiest earmuffs that Victorian science could produce? Or was it just expected that he would be instantly and permanently deaf as a post?

    • @joshuahadams
      @joshuahadams 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      He had a pair of chickens sewn into a hat, I guess.

    • @TeaAndBullets
      @TeaAndBullets 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Josh Adams Thank you for that fantastic image! XD

    • @martinborgen
      @martinborgen 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +elektro3000 Probably he would open his jaw, as if you are equalizing pressure, while firing, hence the blast hopefully won't shatter your eardrums. It's not guaranteed to save your hearing, but it's a neat trick used by artillerymen at the time.

    • @phreakazoith2237
      @phreakazoith2237 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Hey Mr. artilleryman, how comes you don't get deaf operating this beast?""...? huh?""I said: How comes you don't get deaf operating these? ""Huh?""HOW! COMES! YOU! DON'T!... - oh, just forget about my question. Good bye."

  • @E40kGeek_Tactical
    @E40kGeek_Tactical 8 ปีที่แล้ว +152

    too bad they can't fire it :( would be a sight to behold

    • @c4rma776
      @c4rma776 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      They do fire it. Once a year but only using black powder as it's obviously illegal to fire 1 ton shells into the sea, and since its so old it will open up like a flower if real ammunition is used.

    • @largol33t1
      @largol33t1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I would PAY to see a Schwerer Gustav railgun fired...

    • @puddingu120
      @puddingu120 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      sure. if you pay them for everything that's required to fire the gun

    • @owenmercieca1482
      @owenmercieca1482 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They do fire it but only once a year

    • @MrPingudm
      @MrPingudm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hydraulic pump is ready.. 100K to rebuild it.. now they are going to test it again and the mfucker is gonna shot again after 100 years

  • @jimwolford7294
    @jimwolford7294 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Gustav didn't survive the war, but two smaller German railway guns did survive. These were Krupp K5 guns. One in on display at the United States Army Ordnance Museum in Fort Lee (Petersburg, Virginia). The Ordnance museum is not open to the public. The Iowa class battleships had nine 16 inch guns that weighed 133 tons each. Four of these ships survive today as museums, and one is in Virginia. There was also the M1919 coastal defense gun the weighed 484 tons. There was one at Aberdeen proving grounds.

  • @HolbrookStark
    @HolbrookStark 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Lindybeige uses pop culture references so sparingly that "in the wohld" at the beginning is like a rare sighting of a Yeti and feels really special to witness

  • @tomt.8387
    @tomt.8387 7 ปีที่แล้ว +204

    Does a video exist of this thing being fired?

    • @geckoo9190
      @geckoo9190 7 ปีที่แล้ว +120

      I don't think that cameras were invented by the time that it was operable, there are paintings though, but the artist died when he tried to pull that 60fps thing.

    • @c4rma776
      @c4rma776 6 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      They fire it once a year but only using black powder because the beast will blow up if real ammunition is used, since its over 100 years old. Just look up "Fort Rinella gun firing."

    • @DarxusC
      @DarxusC 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      th-cam.com/video/BwC5RMlTM-w/w-d-xo.html

    • @ironskyheart7749
      @ironskyheart7749 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Too bad them videos aren’t a good comparison. It’s only a 10kg charge with no projectile. If it was filled with 200kg of BP and a 1t projectile. You’d know about it

  • @FirstLast-fr4hb
    @FirstLast-fr4hb 8 ปีที่แล้ว +214

    I'd hate to drop one of those shells on my foot

  • @Nafinafnaf
    @Nafinafnaf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    3:52 *he's rappin'*

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    "beach-loaders such as those on the Yamamoto battleship" *breech *Yamato

  • @therealgsicht
    @therealgsicht 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    1:34 1 ton of shell does not equal 1 ton of explosive, according to wikipedia the shells had between 32 and 5 pounds, depending on shelltype. The major part of an artillery shell is made of iron so the explosive can withstand the shock when fired.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      therealgsicht Yes, you are right. Annoyingly, I made the same point myself when I was there but then on camera made the same lazy slip. The hardness of the shell made the concussion greater, however. 5 lbs? I wouldn't have thought that such a charge would be enough to burst the shell. The cross-sections of the shells I saw suggested a much larger charge.

    • @therealgsicht
      @therealgsicht 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Lindybeige Hmm, iam not an expert, but i would think that 19th century cast iron is simply not as tough as we would think of modern steel today. I'm told cast iron is generally more prone to fragmenting when under certain kinds of stress, which is why HESH ammo was more effective against cast iron tanks. As for the 5 lbs, i bet the frag round was grooved from the inside to break into many fragments easier, or partly made of weaker materials to achieve the desired effect.

  • @juanitocalavera5895
    @juanitocalavera5895 9 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    "Don't climb the gun" Where is the fun in that?

    • @phreakazoith2237
      @phreakazoith2237 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe trying to stop people from snapping Dr.Strangelove-selfies :P

  • @C2H5OHist
    @C2H5OHist 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I remember being dumbfounded by this gun as a 11-year old. Later served my mandatory year as an artillery battery ammunitions and maintenance sergeant. We never fired anything bigger than 155mm, though.

  • @blowingfree6928
    @blowingfree6928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember climbing all over this gun as a lad in the 60s. It was derelict then, for want of a better expression. I still have photos. All our dens etc were in abandoned gun emplacements (usually for 5.5s). Dad was in the army and we were in Malta for 3 years; there was loads of history like this then.

  • @ZBritt92
    @ZBritt92 9 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    What made this gun obsolete?

    • @WhiteWeaseI
      @WhiteWeaseI 9 ปีที่แล้ว +70

      Bedsheetrubber92 It was insanely expensive to fire and impractical.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +290

      Bedsheetrubber92 Breach-loaders with far higher rates of fire. Also, improvements in explosives. This thing used black powder.

    • @Draftsman17
      @Draftsman17 9 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      Bedsheetrubber92 aircraft, and missiles. same things that put battleships out of service.

    • @FartMaster69
      @FartMaster69 9 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Mobile artillery

    • @deepbludreams
      @deepbludreams 9 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Bedsheetrubber92 Battleships and the ballistic computer, for example, the 16 inch/ L50 guns of a US navy battleship are NOT limited to as far as they can physically see, they can fire OVER the horizon, many times farther then this old style of gun could, so in theory, the battleship could destroy the coastal battery without even having seen it, and when these battleship mounted guns could fire a round of equal weight to these antique giants but at a much farther distance [20 or so miles], they became obsolete without firing a shot, not to say these sorts of guns where not powerful enough to deal with these new age battleships, they just physically could not be elevated high enough to engage the battleships, nor did they have the velocity to reach them.

  • @nektulosnewbie
    @nektulosnewbie 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Japanese battleship class you mentioned in the description was the Yamato class. Yamamoto an admiral in WWII.

  • @emperorryanii
    @emperorryanii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Imagine having to cut a soldier’s wages for seven years just to fire this gun, 😂

  • @W_Anchor
    @W_Anchor 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    2:05 Oh My Lord "comin out of your wages" "Oh sarge :(" xD

    • @roberthudson1959
      @roberthudson1959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The kernel of truth in that line is that British Army soldiers were charged for lost equipment, unless they could prove that the equipment was lost in battle. Since the net pay of a Napoleonic-era soldier was seven pounds, seven shillings, and seven pence, loss of a musket would turn a soldier into a volunteer for the rest of his career.

  • @volusian95
    @volusian95 9 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    You forgot to mention that this video also features the World's Silliest Helmets

    • @donluchitti
      @donluchitti 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Calgach V. Haha, reminded me of SpaceBalls

    • @caracaes
      @caracaes 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Calgach V. Also, The World's Best Rehearsed Discourse.

    • @bastardsofnazareth
      @bastardsofnazareth 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Calgach V. I'm not sure about that... There'll always be this i.imgur.com/doSrFTd.jpg

    • @ThanksIhateyoutoo
      @ThanksIhateyoutoo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ohhhhhhhh shots fired!

    • @OzoneoceanMJM
      @OzoneoceanMJM 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Calgach V. British military pith helmets are silly? I think they're pretty stylish.

  • @ARSP333
    @ARSP333 9 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Now that's just amazing. Those must have been terrifying to have to battle during war. In 1884 they could potentially fire a one ton shell into space. Now that's what I call more dakka

    • @Scaridian
      @Scaridian 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ***** Needs more dakka

    • @petrolak
      @petrolak 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ***** no, they couldn't, Lindy was exaggerating
      why would they bother with rockets if you could reach space that easily

    • @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin
      @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      unipetrolak Because it hurt me bum bum.

    • @ShivaX51
      @ShivaX51 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      unipetrolak Well even *if* it could, you'd use rockets because you might want to be alive at the "in space" part.

    • @Schulzffw
      @Schulzffw 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ***** And if they painted it red it would have fired faster

  • @scottrich976
    @scottrich976 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Classic Clarkson quote, and today on TOP GUN !!!!

  • @MindBodySoulOk
    @MindBodySoulOk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    gel test please

  • @Yunners
    @Yunners 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It sounds like you were channeling your inner Clarkson for a moment.
    "The biggest gun..... in the world."

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Rob Watson I couldn't go the whole hog. I am my own producer and I'm not happy with punching myself in the face.

    • @Yunners
      @Yunners 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Having to sack yourself would be a bit of a blow to your channel too.

    • @ragimundvonwallat8961
      @ragimundvonwallat8961 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rob Watson you gave me an honest laugh good sir !

    • @censorduck
      @censorduck 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lindybeige To be fair, I don't see your mucking up your own catering.

  • @Nix6p
    @Nix6p 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It looks like it's rifled, so I wonder what the expected barrel life of it was.
    The Paris Gun, a massive artillery piece from WW2, had a barrel life of only 65 rounds. The rounds had to be numbered sequentially in the order they were fired to account for the increase in barrel diameter.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Nix6p Yes, it was rifled. Bronze studs on the outside of the shells gripped the rifling.

    • @petrolak
      @petrolak 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nix6p Paris gun was WWI, Schwerer Gustav and Dora were WWII

    • @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin
      @Usammityduzntafraidofanythin 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lindybeige Must have been hard to ram it down.

  • @archaicartisan2670
    @archaicartisan2670 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The job of charging the cannon and "proudly" standing beside it whilst it was fired... was probably as glorious of a job, as "Chow Runner" in military boot camp. Hahaha. I digress. Thanks for the awesome video :-)

  • @3Hatts
    @3Hatts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I went there this week and can confirm the shells are farcically large. Really good tour too.

  • @MajesticDemonLord
    @MajesticDemonLord 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Lindy - the Battleship is the Yamato, Yamamato was the Admiral

  • @Woodthorn
    @Woodthorn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Antoine Blanchez might've just become one of my new favourite persons.

  • @PugilistCactus
    @PugilistCactus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "It is definitely the biggest ever muzzle-loader. There were other big guns, beach-loaders such as those on the Yamamoto battleship, or the German Schwerer Gustav railway gun, but these don't count because they have either been destroyed or sent to the bottom of the sea."
    US 406mm's would like a word. Also BL 18 still exists in storage today. So technically the biggest gun in the world is in the UK.

  • @Fnaffan_-tc2so
    @Fnaffan_-tc2so 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Coastal Artillerie with 45cm Kaliber, gets called the biggest Gun in the World Gerät40/Karl Mortar with 60cm Concrete Shells: Interesting Dora Railway Gun/Schwerer Gustav, with 80cm Kaliber: Am i a Joke to you?

  • @MGlBlaze
    @MGlBlaze 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    That is a hell of a lot of steel.

    • @CashKingD
      @CashKingD 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Huh, didn't expect to see you here.

    • @kurade1096
      @kurade1096 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      why are you of all people here?

  • @zacktoor1591
    @zacktoor1591 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "Do you like big guns" As an American, I am insulted that you would ask this...
    Of course I like big guns lol.

  • @SweetSoulGaming
    @SweetSoulGaming 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Do you live in Malta? I visited there last year when I was 16 and loved it! I'm thinking of living there when I am older would it be wise for me to learn Maltese?

  • @jamestedjo3736
    @jamestedjo3736 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    One ton shell, the first time I heard I thought he said Wonton shell, hue

  • @JayeFoster
    @JayeFoster 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So 471 m/s is 1.38 mach. Meaning the shell would reach you before you heard the absurd amount of noise it would make as it ripped through the air.

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jaye Foster Yes, it was supersonic. You'd see the flash about 15 seconds before your ship's destruction.

  • @benjaminfulcher4729
    @benjaminfulcher4729 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    18" deviation at 4 miles? that .01 MOA accuracy ...

  • @Spitsz01
    @Spitsz01 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your humor Lindy!

  • @xTheRealKestrelx
    @xTheRealKestrelx 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ahh my artillery mates and I always reminisce about beach loaders ... ramming all that sand down the mouths of cannons under the watchful eye of lifeguards.....

  • @pandaphil
    @pandaphil 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I suppose the battleship Yamato's 18-inch guns technically still exist. Somewhere on the bottom of the ocean.

  • @Calum_S
    @Calum_S 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I went to Fort Rinella earlier this year. I highly recommend it, the guides do a great job.

  • @karl-erlendmikalsen5159
    @karl-erlendmikalsen5159 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was under the impression that the Adolfkanone in Harstad, Norway was the biggest land based cannon in the world. It weighs in at 1,475 tonnes, has a barrel weight of 158,664 kg, barrel length of 21.5m and fires shells weighing 1,030 kg every two minutes on targets up to 56 km away.

  • @amiralozse1781
    @amiralozse1781 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:40 the accent of this soldier is hilarious!!

  • @VengeanceIV
    @VengeanceIV 9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Civilization DLC please.

  • @CarlGGHamilton
    @CarlGGHamilton 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The Dora and Schwerer Gustav fired shells more than 4 times as heavy. And the size of the gun it self was tremendously larger than this one.

    • @KlaustheViking
      @KlaustheViking 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      7 tonne shells, the Schwerer Gustave fire. 80cm gun.

  • @Demonicwolf3000
    @Demonicwolf3000 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not what I had in mind, I have to admit. But damn that was cool as hell, this is why Lindybeige is one of the best on youtube.

  • @MonkPetite
    @MonkPetite 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The man telling about the guns is quite a character.. I have spoken with him about the fort etc etc and I believe he must be form that time. Thanks for sharing!

  • @Flight_of_Icarus
    @Flight_of_Icarus 9 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I couldn't understand a word of what Antoine said.

    • @robbert-janmerk6783
      @robbert-janmerk6783 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Iconoclasm_ It was something about "a hundred tons".

    • @krashd
      @krashd 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Belgians really are unintelligible then, I always thought 'Allo 'Allo was making it up!

    • @d4rkhound388
      @d4rkhound388 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Iconoclasm_ something about 180 degrees, cleaning barrel, 180 degrees more bullshit cleaning then BAM LOADED AND FIRED.

    • @MrSvenovitch
      @MrSvenovitch 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Allo allo was set in France. It all depends doesn't it, starting with the fact he has French as a mother tongue. There are also Flemish and German speaking Belgians. Unintelligible people exist everywhere, even where English is the official language, would you believe?

    • @majorgear1021
      @majorgear1021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He was easier to understand than Biden.

  • @andrewmillburg3167
    @andrewmillburg3167 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    So what kind of bridge was that in the beginning? Intrigued at fortifications.

  • @AftermathRV
    @AftermathRV 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "ready for action 1884 to 19095"
    Thats wrong , its still ready to fire. The belgian captain is still aware of how to fire it, we WILL defeat them at the seas before they get much closer i tell you

  • @michalsimanek6988
    @michalsimanek6988 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    0:40 I heard a song on www.newgrounds.com that was using some of your lines...
    I am glad i found that songs origin :-)
    (btw the song is named "Don't mess"
    i think :P)

  • @sonofangron2969
    @sonofangron2969 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    5:04 - No, no Lindybeige: if you want to copy Clarkson, you have to say it like this...
    "The biggest gun.....
    ....in the *world*!!"

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Demonflesh spawn And I'd need a grad filter wide angle lens shot, with white flash crossfade editing...

  • @SandroSegadora
    @SandroSegadora 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like big guns and I cannot lie.

  • @BRAgamer
    @BRAgamer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The 1870 Caio Duilio and its sister ship, the Enrico Dandolo, carried FOUR of these guns on board, each...

  • @rushthezeppelin
    @rushthezeppelin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow that thing has less than 1/4 MOA accuracy! Pretty freaking impressive,

  • @sheadjohn
    @sheadjohn 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    you do know that the Iowa battle ships still exist. This gun is no were near that. 1 US short ton is 2,200 pounds. 2700 pounds is 1.2 metric tons.
    "They fired projectiles weighing from 1,900 to 2,700 pounds (850 to 1,200 kg) at a maximum speed of 2,690 feet per second (820 m/s) with a range of up to 24 miles (39 km). "

    • @rosslynstone
      @rosslynstone 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A short ton is 2000lb

    • @artificersworkshop
      @artificersworkshop 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      john shead But was it a rifled muzzle loader? Sure, we have bigger guns, but the Armstrong 100 ton gun was built in the late Victorian Era, not closer to modern day, and was a muzzle loader, not a breech loader.

    • @rafamichalak2314
      @rafamichalak2314 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@artificersworkshop exactly that making yours dick bigger because "you" have bigger gun is so stupid.
      In those time and till now it's biggest muzzleloader gun and that all he said...

    • @PeteCourtier
      @PeteCourtier 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My dad can beat your dad in fight.

  • @adamtaylor7534
    @adamtaylor7534 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cool gun but one or two horse archers could easily deal with it.

    • @ragimundvonwallat8961
      @ragimundvonwallat8961 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Adam Taylor you mean dolphin archers

    • @censorduck
      @censorduck 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Adam Taylor A katana could slice it in two.

  • @philosophymythsandlegends3153
    @philosophymythsandlegends3153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Few of these along the Kent coast would do us proud now.

  • @A_Random_Person324
    @A_Random_Person324 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *[Laughs In Carl Gustav Railway Gun]*

  • @deepsouthredneck1
    @deepsouthredneck1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Two world wars did a number on Britain, but no doubt they were someone you didn't want to fuck with in the 19th century.

    • @oz_jones
      @oz_jones 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      dreyrugr She was an epmire for a reason.

    • @theguy9208
      @theguy9208 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      dreyrugr the ol' girl still has quite the military, its not like they faded into complete obscurity, messing with them would still be quite a bad idea...

    • @deepsouthredneck1
      @deepsouthredneck1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      theguy9208 Yeah, but if they had no support from NATO they wouldn't be able to fight off powers like China or Russia, they just don't have the numbers anymore.

    • @ragimundvonwallat8961
      @ragimundvonwallat8961 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      dreyrugr on its own alone???? luxembourg would have its chance

    • @ShivaX51
      @ShivaX51 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      dreyrugr You didn't really want to fuck with them through most of the 20th century either.

  • @eddiegruver946
    @eddiegruver946 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    How do you think a modern vessel would fare against a gun this big?

    • @filomenaa
      @filomenaa 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      A gun like this would be very vulnerable to aircraft attack or missiles.

    • @eddiegruver946
      @eddiegruver946 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theopontus I meant a sea vessel, not aircraft. But yes I do agree that this wouldn't do horribly much for aircraft.

    • @Sentinalh
      @Sentinalh 9 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Theopontus That isn't what he asked.

    • @Earthenfist
      @Earthenfist 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Eddie Gruver But I imagine, barring those (say, if it got a surprise round off)... Yeah, it'd probably sink a carrier with a direct hit. And it'd probably also make for a hell of a sub-sinker.

    • @filomenaa
      @filomenaa 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sentinalh He didn't ask what kind of damage it would do a modern vessel. Aircraft carriers carry, well, aircraft and other modern military vessels are equipped with missiles.

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chech out the 20 inch Rodman guns in New York harbor in the war between the states 1860s. Made possible by his ability to cool the huge castings from within the tubes and his development of better propellant. Too clever.

  • @lfricmunuc4534
    @lfricmunuc4534 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    May I suggest, that you visit Fort Scratchley at Newcastle (on Sea, Australia). It has two naval guns (6 inches I believe), which they fire; it did have other guns, and 'disappearing' guns.

  • @xXHomerSimpsonXx
    @xXHomerSimpsonXx 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Dr. Zelenka? is that you?

  • @dandere6122
    @dandere6122 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    From hes acsent i can say he is from walonia (french part of belgium) im belgian

  • @shitposter1000
    @shitposter1000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lindybeige trying to take a nice selfie for the thumbnail just warms my heart

  • @adambane1719
    @adambane1719 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 100-ton gun arrived in Malta from Woolwich on 10 September 1882. It remained at the dockyards for some months before being ferried to Rinella Bay. Over the next three months one hundred men from the Royal Artillery manhandled it to the battery. The gun entered service in January 1884. Practice firing was limited to one short every three months due to cost; each shell cost as much as the daily wage of 2600 soldiers. The gun fired for the last time on 5 May 1905 before being withdrawn from active service in 1906. It never saw action in 20 years of service.

  • @knownothing3364
    @knownothing3364 7 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    uss NJ and Wisconsin are still afloat-
    16inch Iowa class BBS 2500 lb shell ?

    • @leeboy26
      @leeboy26 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *'when it was made' and 'biggest muzzle-loader'

    • @knownothing3364
      @knownothing3364 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Lee i mean in the discription he also mentions yamoto class bbs and says- none are still afloat

    • @glandhound
      @glandhound 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      17.72" > 16"

    • @knownothing3364
      @knownothing3364 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Pekka Rastas 2500lbs>

    • @glandhound
      @glandhound 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's the shell, not the gun.

  • @thatnewguy1579
    @thatnewguy1579 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    As others have said the German WW2 railway gun called the Gustav was way bigger

    • @leeboy26
      @leeboy26 7 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Read the description.

    • @1Brick2Brick3
      @1Brick2Brick3 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thatnewguy 15 Read the description

    • @tankman66
      @tankman66 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      make me

    • @flatlo
      @flatlo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      'As others have said...'
      So, why'd you say it?

    • @ColtonTroy
      @ColtonTroy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That is what I said

  • @88luda88
    @88luda88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The amount of jokes based on long cylindrical sizes increased drastically the closer your proximity to Fort Rinella.
    We will never know why.

  • @jurekszczurek2896
    @jurekszczurek2896 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Admit it, you only put Antoine here for a comic relief.

  • @thesaint8400
    @thesaint8400 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Am I allowed to conceal carry this?

    • @bcubed72
      @bcubed72 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is that a 100 ton cannon in your pocket, or are you happy to see me?

  • @shaggnar2014
    @shaggnar2014 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *surviving by weight
    Yeah, there's a lot of definitions of 'big'

    • @caracaes
      @caracaes 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tiberius Hrafn-Úlfur If you consider a Saturn V rocket a "gun", then the Saturn V rocket at Johnson Space Center is the biggest gun surviving.
      It should be a valid classification, as if it was used to bomb, it'd completely level several blocks of a city. A Saturn V rocket could put the gun shown in the video into orbit.

    • @koffieslikkersenior
      @koffieslikkersenior 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jonatas Silveira Baldo It could carry it in theory, but I don't think it would fit :)

    • @FredCheckers
      @FredCheckers 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jonatas Silveira Baldo It was designed to carry a nuclear bomb. Many american space rockets were originally ICBMs. Though a gun usually denotes propellant eternal to the projectile, rather than connected like on a missile.

  • @Vostadues
    @Vostadues 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    8 miles/12.8 km??? 100-ton gun only have a 6600 yards/6 km maximum range, and that is far shorter then the 12.8 km by the clam!

    • @BillFromTheHill100
      @BillFromTheHill100 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      What the fuck did you just say?
      Is that english?

  • @davejacob5208
    @davejacob5208 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    why weren´t those things installed more often or for a longer time? seems like they served their purpose pretty well.

  • @BastuGubbar
    @BastuGubbar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    imagine if this gun was operating in WW1 defending the city. would be badass.

  • @leonardokim
    @leonardokim 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    That's one amazing gun!
    Too bad we are not going to see that in action.

    • @alcapone9550
      @alcapone9550 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/Hf3fgfHoTOc/w-d-xo.html

  • @NachoDaMan
    @NachoDaMan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now THAT is a big iron.

  • @OkachaWasTaken
    @OkachaWasTaken 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:06 my favorite part in the video

  • @JessHull
    @JessHull 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "this polygonal shape!"

  • @beanhead159
    @beanhead159 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about the krupp k5
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krupp_K5
    i cant seem to find the weight of the barrel but the whole thing weighs 200+ tons

    • @lindybeige
      @lindybeige  9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      beanhead159 Yes, much later railway guns were in their entirety heavier.

    • @kirovskiecrab1365
      @kirovskiecrab1365 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the gustav gun weighs 1350 tonnes and has 800mm shells

    • @joelwilson4338
      @joelwilson4338 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah but the Gustav gun does exist anymore but if it did it would dwarf this gun by about 7 times

    • @taskinberkay
      @taskinberkay 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      and shells weight 4.8 tons.

    • @artemslikens8107
      @artemslikens8107 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      krupp k5 is only 11+in sir,but has a longer range I've read it

  • @Gearparadummies
    @Gearparadummies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Biggest gun in the world"
    *Laughs in Dora Cannon"

    • @finlaymcdiarmid5832
      @finlaymcdiarmid5832 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Biggest surviving gun, he put a disclaimer at a the start

    • @Gearparadummies
      @Gearparadummies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@finlaymcdiarmid5832 I stand corrected, then. Didn't get that.

    • @finlaymcdiarmid5832
      @finlaymcdiarmid5832 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Gearparadummies i thought that too until i looked

  • @AstOnokGaming
    @AstOnokGaming 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Forgotten Weapons just did a video on this exact gun and its really interesting to watch them both to compare
    I have a softer spot for Lindy TBH