PHYSICS of your PROCESSOR. Problem of the nanometer limit

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มิ.ย. 2024
  • We all know that modern processors are works of art with billions of transistors inside, but why is it so difficult to create them? Why have the technical processes of the last 10 years been pure marketing? Let's dive into the physics of our processor, what photolithography is and what difficulties its application has.
    00:00 - Entry
    00:47 - Photolithography and process node - how are they related?
    07:23 - Extreme ultraviolet
    10:33 - X-ray
    #mycomputer #processor #silicon
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 113

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere ปีที่แล้ว +34

    In the early 1980's I was using near UV light for making discrete bipolar transistors with 1 micron wide surface features. A 1 micron line is a fuzzy blur at those wavelengths. We were using alignment marks on opposite sides of a 50 to 75 mm wide Silicon wafer which made use of that blurriness. When you have two concentric rectangles, an interference pattern becomes visible between their respective edges. So the wafers could be aligned manually in 4 degrees of freedom (left-right, up-down, rotationally, focal depth) to an accuracy of about 0.1 micron at an alignment mark spacing of more than 70 mm. Mask alignment across that distance is therefore incredibly precise. Modern wafers are maybe bigger than 300 mm in diameter, and similar mask alignment techniques are still used at far UV wavelengths. So what this means is that chip surface features somewhat smaller than the wavelength of the light used can be produced.
    Chip quality always varies across the wafer, no matter how precisely all parameters are controlled, even ignoring Silicon lattice faults and the inevitable residual contamination which occurs at all stages of production Even with simple transistors, one small wafer can yield a range of devices from very close to the theoretical limits to totally useless. And as you say, the higher the device complexity and the smaller the elements of that device, the more faults accumulate, and the lower good yields result.
    Even with ion deposition, there will always be anomalies.
    Wafer fabrication engineers have been known to refer to their skills as being very much like cooking; no two sessions result in precisely the same outcome. There is as much art as there is science, mathematics, and a wide range of other skills, along with years of experience in the production of high quality semiconductor devices. Their retail prices really are justified.

  • @ShawnRitch
    @ShawnRitch ปีที่แล้ว +44

    This is the most comprehensive explanation I have heard yet about modern processors. Great work -- Thank you :)

  • @dilipdas5777
    @dilipdas5777 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Most underrated channel. Should have millions views

  • @krozareq
    @krozareq ปีที่แล้ว +27

    We're reaching a limit with current technologies in hardware. New technologies that meet the thermal, cost and conductivity requirements, and can be mass produced to take over from the current generation is going to bring with it some growing pains. Really demonstrates the importance of software to take up the slack in the meantime. New algorithms, better use of parallelization, etc. are going to be vital. Low level programming is far from dead and a lot of the open source, low level C dependencies, that has been the backbone of modern software for decades will need some rethinking or be entirely re-written. Poorly optimized software has been too reliant on increasingly faster hardware. The lessons learned by the old guard of software engineering are dying off, with preference of merely learning and using high level frameworks. In the meantime, our digital infrastructure is built on a 40-50-year-old foundation.

    • @Phasma6969
      @Phasma6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah software nowadays is incredibly bloated

    • @creeper6530
      @creeper6530 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I just wait for the day that people figure out Windows NT isn't efficient enough because of its age and will switch to Linux

  • @Adrninistrator
    @Adrninistrator ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Many channels explain this matter only about quantum channeling
    Glad you explain other things
    you're the best sir

  • @MakeshiftMartyr
    @MakeshiftMartyr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is information I didn’t know I wanted to know but I’m glad I found this channel. Great video

  • @AllemandInstable
    @AllemandInstable ปีที่แล้ว +5

    simply explained and with enough details for someone that has had few physics courses but continued on another path
    impressive work mate

  • @abracadabra1359
    @abracadabra1359 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice info, excellent, hope videos rare like these and detailed come in future for us to understand simply

  • @Roland_Deschain_of_Gilead19
    @Roland_Deschain_of_Gilead19 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so fascinating! Thanks for all the work you dis putting this all together and explaining it so well!

  • @LilyVale-gi3si
    @LilyVale-gi3si ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It is crazy to think that in our world something unpredictable in it's true nature yields predictable patterns just further outside its scope

  • @David-Zita
    @David-Zita ปีที่แล้ว +2

    please make podcasts this was cool and educational , your voice will will make you a lot of money.

  • @haroldseaman4243
    @haroldseaman4243 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very cool just being your average high school graduate made it extremely easy to follow!! I'm coming up on 50 and wished I had access to videos like this in my youth probably would of went farther in my education. Damn MTV been a drummer since I was 6 🤣!

  • @wintelohno1463
    @wintelohno1463 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    very informative... love this channel

  • @ruperterskin2117
    @ruperterskin2117 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool. Thanks for sharing.

  • @GeoffryGifari
    @GeoffryGifari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its wild that chip manufacturing got so far that quantum uncertainty needs to be taken seriously

  • @andrej_sefcik
    @andrej_sefcik ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another amazing video, keep em coming!

  • @aternias
    @aternias ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video MK!

  • @gkdresden
    @gkdresden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think from the viewpoint of electronics we have to live with the structural limits of solid state physics. If we like it or not, the lateral limit is several atomic distances. If you go below it the structures become thermally unstable and you get a lot of throuble with electro-migration. The current densities in the metal layer structures are allready now in the order of macroscopic superconducting structures (wires and tapes). I think the limit will be around 1 nm. This is also the order of magnitude where we come to atomic clusters and the materials loose their bulk properties. The material behavior becomes more and more domiated by surface physics.
    I am also impressed that the phototoresist itself is capable to depict such small structures.

  • @Johan-rm6ec
    @Johan-rm6ec ปีที่แล้ว

    No fluff straight to the core, excellent video as only eastern europeans can make.

  • @BluesJammer69
    @BluesJammer69 ปีที่แล้ว

    i worked in a wafer fab for 20 years...I learned more about it in 13 mins...nice stuff there!

  • @vlad_tlt
    @vlad_tlt ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Спасибо, было интересно! )

  • @ericwaweru4043
    @ericwaweru4043 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video
    You may have also mentioned technologies such as multi patterning
    And the shift to more of task specific silicon instead of general compute,

  • @sneakycactus8815
    @sneakycactus8815 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:33 SPACE RANGERS SOUNDTRACK!!! totally makes sense since this is a russian channel, but holy shit this was a wonderful surprise.

  • @Beavernator
    @Beavernator ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Time for a modern renaissance of efficiency, and programming that actually uses the tech we currently have... Stagnation should breed some creativity...

  • @Avve22
    @Avve22 ปีที่แล้ว

    From a new viewer of your channel:
    Good info, I was expecting you to cover the Gate-leakage current too, which would become a headache when we reach near 1nm process node..

  • @GeoffryGifari
    @GeoffryGifari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can the engineers even _control_ x-rays to the precision required for photolithography?

  • @FreeXPie
    @FreeXPie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well done

  • @paulkschan7640
    @paulkschan7640 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @GeoffryGifari
    @GeoffryGifari 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What are the difficulties of stacking the silicon chips to make a 3D structure?

  • @bicualexandru246
    @bicualexandru246 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i can't believe you used parts of the soundtrack from Space Rangers. going to sub just for that. excellent taste

  • @ankitkhandelwal426
    @ankitkhandelwal426 ปีที่แล้ว

    wonderful

  • @ArifGhostwriter
    @ArifGhostwriter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍🏽 🇬🇧 January 2024
    A subject as interesting as it is complex - treated brilliantly & edifyingly.

  • @Maltebyte2
    @Maltebyte2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Crazy that we dont get a simillar effect to the double slit experiment when making these 10nm nodes!

  • @bassplayer3974
    @bassplayer3974 ปีที่แล้ว

    There quite creative be plenty of work arounds and fudges for performance till a replacement found

  • @sheeftz
    @sheeftz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Это канал "Мой Компьютер" решил покорять иностранный сегмент? Музыка то я знаю откуда.

  • @kayakMike1000
    @kayakMike1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about a substrate that stands up to heat better? Diamond semiconductors might be able to clock much faster.

  • @MauricioKanada
    @MauricioKanada ปีที่แล้ว

    In my enormous (obvious not) knowledge, I think that the faster solution is chip stacking. It could aliviate the problem of the distance that the signals need to travel.

  • @johndoh5182
    @johndoh5182 ปีที่แล้ว

    Right, the distance a signal can travel inside the die is not relevant because the die is tiny and the layout of transistors on a die ensure that signals that are generated don't need to travel the length of the die. So, what matters is how fast you can switch a transistor on and off. What also matters is how much resistance this creates and how much resistance there is in the circuit in general at very high frequencies, which is what increases power consumption and heat. In general the higher the frequency the more perfect the construction needs to be. Imperfections create resistance.
    But that's the hard part, etching a circuit ever smaller, but having to make it more perfect.

  • @uwuclxdy
    @uwuclxdy ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bro do you know how to sync audio with video? At least check before upload next time

  • @nicks4597
    @nicks4597 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    audio not synced

  • @MrGsxrme
    @MrGsxrme ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm thinking stopping at 3-4nm for awhile and bringing us HMB ram on the CPU die and removing the normal DDR sockets. Extremely high cache on the CPU with 512mb shared cache and HMB ram would be fantastic.

    • @elcebollon7750
      @elcebollon7750 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know if in misunderstood something about a video he made before, but he said that it cannot go lower than 5nm.

    • @MickenCZProfi
      @MickenCZProfi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@elcebollon7750 In that case he got clowned, RTX 4000 series uses 4nm and 3nm is currently being produced by TSMC and bought mostly by Apple for the future M3.

    • @elcebollon7750
      @elcebollon7750 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MickenCZProfi it was my bad, i look it up and the silicone atom is 0.2 nanometer and china made a 0.3 nanometer transistor, also there is a chip with 0.5 nanometers transistors that can switch from insulator to conductor, so probably I heard wrong.

  • @reizinhodojogo3956
    @reizinhodojogo3956 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:15 give credits to the background video, i remember seeing a video about diy lithography thing with micrometer(i forgot video title) and it had this part

  • @gez_4515
    @gez_4515 ปีที่แล้ว

    Music from The Space Rangers II?? WOAH

  • @CanHazDeezHandzBOX
    @CanHazDeezHandzBOX 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍👍

  • @DarkAngel-dc3te
    @DarkAngel-dc3te ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't wait for quantum computer

  • @aldrighi
    @aldrighi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nasa has the power of a 286 processor to sent a man to the moon. We need 3GHz to play candy crush.

  • @cabanford
    @cabanford ปีที่แล้ว +81

    Sound sync issues. Otherwise nice work 👍

    • @vadulme8640
      @vadulme8640 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Ah shit, here we go again... It's not poor sync, it's a dub. Can't be perfect, but we did it as best we could.

    • @cabanford
      @cabanford ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@vadulme8640 that explains it! Sorry for the noise 😬🙂

    • @yakovyuzhakov5688
      @yakovyuzhakov5688 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Would be awesome to see your most recent content as well

    • @baardi2
      @baardi2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's dubbed from russian

    • @VihangaIndusara
      @VihangaIndusara ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He's speaking in a different language btw

  • @hercavotica
    @hercavotica ปีที่แล้ว

    what about 4nm mobile chips?
    are they really 4nm?

  • @jozsiolah1435
    @jozsiolah1435 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I counted the leads of the Intel Core 2 Duo, and the Intel Pentium Dual core. The Core 2 Duo was rated at 2 Ghz, 2 mb cache. The Pentium was rated at 2.2 Ghz, 1 mb cache. The Core 2 Duo laptop cpu had about 5-10 more strings than the other one, but I couldn’t count them exactly.

  • @ricerob
    @ricerob ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You left out the fact that each layer requires a separate mask and there may be up to 25 layers on each chip so that each wafer will have to go through the photo lithography machine 25 times

  • @suburbia2050
    @suburbia2050 ปีที่แล้ว

    A pause in chip fabrication advances aimed only at processor speed may actually have some positives, it will incentivise more efficient code and delay mass-unemployment due to AI

  • @treyquattro
    @treyquattro ปีที่แล้ว

    are these videos shot in Russian and later dubbed into English? The first video I watched I thought the audio was out of sync with the video, but it seems like it wasn't just a one-off. Nothing wrong with it, just wondering.

  • @guli7224
    @guli7224 ปีที่แล้ว

    After reach the minimun size, scientists may find a way to double different status for one transistor

  • @seckinseckin3919
    @seckinseckin3919 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "if it ionize, it ionize" - Captan Ivan Drago

  • @limpanskok
    @limpanskok ปีที่แล้ว +1

    110% 👍👍👊👊

  • @totallymady42069
    @totallymady42069 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Shame about the audio syncing, otherwise a perfect explanation of modern processors

  • @eone199
    @eone199 ปีที่แล้ว

    i agree if intel fakes its process node
    but for TSMC? do you really have a proof if TSMC process node is not smaller than 10nm???

  • @law-abiding-criminal
    @law-abiding-criminal ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:25 did you really mean "increased by three times"?

    • @1p2k-223
      @1p2k-223 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he meant 3 thousand

  • @TacticalTrucker
    @TacticalTrucker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    _Actually, it’s the closer the transistors are the faster it operates, this is a knowledge by AMD’ˢ R&D department, The problem is overheating and performance, this was AMD’s biggest Challenge to defeat Intel_
    _Nevertheless, AMD was able to overcome the heating issue, the performance was still down, so what they did was incorporated, the north bridge processor into the CPU, giving birth to AMD’s APU, this allowed the CPU/APU to have its own direct communication to other processes on the motherboard; although they were not able to increase performance, they were able to increase efficiency_
    _This reduce bottlenecking, and decreased motherboard resources, allowing for a smaller motherboard, using less power; with this kind of processor, there would be no need to increase speed of the CPU if you can reduce the bottlenecking through the motherboard; CPU speed is contingent upon other processors on the motherboard_

  • @javierandreiotaku
    @javierandreiotaku ปีที่แล้ว

    The sound sync stressed me out, but good explanation

  • @BubblegumCrash332
    @BubblegumCrash332 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was a great video Thank You 🇺🇦

  • @Nationfirst.
    @Nationfirst. ปีที่แล้ว

    Well then shrink time n space.

  • @vladislavzavada3910
    @vladislavzavada3910 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Space rangers soundtrack?

  • @shawnbecher2661
    @shawnbecher2661 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do they connect 1 billion transistors with a few hundred pins. Seems like and explanation of how they landed on the moon.

  • @SR-CHARITY
    @SR-CHARITY ปีที่แล้ว +1

    content is gud.....but lipsync is not present

  • @JohannesDavidsen-bw7ki
    @JohannesDavidsen-bw7ki ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe they should create led cpu next time 😆🤣

  • @FreeXPie
    @FreeXPie ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You should post your video on Reddit

    • @mka2
      @mka2  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/yrr503/physics_of_your_processor_problem_of_the/

    • @baardi2
      @baardi2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      R/technology maybe?

  • @AlfaPro1337
    @AlfaPro1337 ปีที่แล้ว

    Intel began gluing (according to AMD) since P4D and early version of C2D and C2Q, and knows that there's a huge bottlenecking.

  • @latifkirl9930
    @latifkirl9930 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did IBM make the world's fastest chip

  • @mi-rek
    @mi-rek ปีที่แล้ว

    I wouldn't call technical processes of the last 10 years "pure marketing". It's still engineering. Not a huge breakthrough, but improving the tech in various smart ways, to overcome the limits.

  • @darchojandreoski9634
    @darchojandreoski9634 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hier Darcho Jandreoski Pegasus Galaktica 7 - Now intel Pentium 4 Chip for Home PC Computer dann habe ich ein Intel Pentium 76 Chip Prozessor 76 X Sterkere Chip als Intel Pentium 4 Chip

  • @MysticalGesture
    @MysticalGesture ปีที่แล้ว

    I heard of these fans for laptops that are ultra silent and use mini turbo jets to cool your cpu right from the die itself. I forgot the name of the company but I'm sure in the next five years laptops will use this Turbojet tech as standard.

  • @testplmnb
    @testplmnb ปีที่แล้ว

    XD
    3 milions x 3 = 10 bilions.
    USA magic calc.

  • @rahulj9
    @rahulj9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well. What is up with the upbeat music? I thought we were fucking conquering Mother Russia ;))

  • @petergriffin383
    @petergriffin383 ปีที่แล้ว

    The next big leap will be quantum computers

    • @Harvey_Pekar
      @Harvey_Pekar ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately, practical quantum computers for mainstream use, ie. desktop quantum computers, are decades away - assuming that'll be possible at all. In the interim, I foresee a major change in how we implement chiplet and core design. AI will help design better and better masks, thus making processing in the current nodes much more efficient. Moore's law died with him. We have to concede to that, and attack the problem from other angles.

    • @petergriffin383
      @petergriffin383 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Harvey_Pekar I agree, we're decades away.. Controlling thermals would be good leap forward. Maybe one day we'll have nanotubes that act like vapor chamber pipes built right into the die. We're going to need something more substantial than what we have now for dissipating heat in order to maximize the potential computing power.

  • @hyperbartgdonmobile2605
    @hyperbartgdonmobile2605 ปีที่แล้ว

    Привет инглишмэны

  • @SlimedogNumbaSixty9
    @SlimedogNumbaSixty9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do your hands perfectly match what you're saying but your mouth is speaking another language lol

  • @tombouie
    @tombouie ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hmmmm .... ;
    *I have been asking fancy-pants geeks these simple-damn questions for decades, the least-worst answers I got was endless damn circular tech jargon. Thks for anticipating my simple questions (aka crux system design factors) & clearly/succinctly/etc answering them w/o all the endless damn circular tech jargon. Pls don’t fall prey to the religion of Geekism & start talking in its religious geek tongues just like the rest of'm. I’m not anti-science, just a scientism heretic tortured for decades. Oh ?Any succinct-books explaining this stuff clearly like you do?
    *Oh ?Hows-abouts doing FPGAs? Supposedly a FPGA turns a theoretical hardware processor into a software development project. Perfect for low-volume projects where an ASIC processor is far too expensive, takes too long, etc. Since you can update the FPGA just like you updated its software, an FPGA unit potentially has a longer life than an ASIC implementation. If unit volumes ever gets high-enough, an FPGA is a perfect tool to implement/develop the specs for an ASIC. I'm working myself to death trying to learn the secret/black art of FPGAs (ain’t much help out-there).
    *Thks again

  • @dareczek2974
    @dareczek2974 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are your lips not in sync with the video?

  • @amourdillo
    @amourdillo ปีที่แล้ว

    Zelensky? That you bro?

  • @marcounchained
    @marcounchained ปีที่แล้ว

    I think your video is out of sync.

  • @Charlie-zj3hw
    @Charlie-zj3hw ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is your video quality so crappy

  • @Richmode1000
    @Richmode1000 ปีที่แล้ว

    Disliked... disturbing music and audio error

    • @clickbaitpro
      @clickbaitpro ปีที่แล้ว

      My thoughts exactly, then I looked closely. It's dubbed from russian

  • @vazgen6672
    @vazgen6672 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is it 10 billions divided by 3 million equals 3 times??

  • @Brass_Tax
    @Brass_Tax ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know what the fuck he’s talking about 😂 Alien tech to me

  • @vazgen6672
    @vazgen6672 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stupid musical background, errors and uncertainties