ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มี.ค. 2019
- After Jos Buttler's recent mankad dismissal in the ipl I've decided to make a first crocket compilation by looking at other times a mankad has been attempted in a cricket match in Mankading in Cricket Compilation
जोस बटलर की हाल ही में आईपीएल में बर्खास्तगी के बाद मैंने पहली बार एक क्रॉक का संकलन बनाने का फैसला किया है, जिसे देखते हुए मांकड़ में एक क्रिकेट मैच में क्रिकेट संकलन में मांकड की कोशिश हुई
ਆਈਪੀਐਲ ਵਿਚ ਜੋਸ ਬਟਲਰ ਦੀ ਹਾਲ ਹੀ ਵਿਚ ਮਾਨਕਦ ਬਰਖਾਸਤਗੀ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਮੈਂ ਕਈ ਵਾਰ ਦੇਖ ਰਿਹਾ ਹਾਂ ਕਿ ਮਨਕਦ ਨੇ ਕ੍ਰਿਕਟ ਮੈਚ ਵਿਚ ਮਨਕੱਦੀ 'ਚ ਕ੍ਰਿਕਟ ਮੈਚ ਕਰਵਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਕੋਸ਼ਿਸ਼ ਕੀਤੀ ਹੈ.
All rights go to ICC, Sky Sports and Star Sports
Credits Simbly Chumma, Live Cricket, SK, Nadeem Hussain, anandraju shiva, Good News and Osanda91
Disclaimer If you see your content in this video and you wish for it not to be there then contact me and I'll remove it from the video. Please don't tell TH-cam as they'll give me a copyright strike that'll ruin this channel.
The first one, the sri lankan bowler warned him once, but he did he again so he hit the bails.
Vinith Madola Do you not consider him to have entered his delivery stride? I do.
Josh Hanson nah.
He was barely out of his crease. Was hardly like he was halfway down the pitch
Fellianinho7 Run-outs are mostly close, what if that barely costs them a run-out. He even warned him not once but three times in different occasions. These batsmen think it's their privilege to leave the crease before the balls bowled.
We can understand english bro. You dont have to tell the same thing again.
I did this when I was 8 in PE and people thought I was an idiot.
Josh Wabnitz that’s kinda sad, but also hilarious
I did it when I was 6 months old so what
@@James-it8gx my dude 😂😂😂😂
Cricket Legend I did it before I was I. The womb
You were an idiot.
In IPL 2019 - Both Ashwin and Buttler have mankading experience from different position 😂🤣
@K yeah lol
Butler be like.. Aisa mere he saath kyu hota hai😂😂😂
ashwin and makkhan
Who the fuck is "Butter"?
"Buttler " Why always me😭😭😭😭
I was looking for this comment only
Why always you stepping out of the crease before delivery
Very underrated comment
@@shantanuchaturvedi3037 lol🤣🤣
@@vikrantgarg4677 though it is very rare. Buttler involved it in 2 times😑😑😑
I love how people confuse 'the spirit' of the game with 'the rules' of the game. Don't try to leave the crease before you're due to leave the crease and you won't get Mankadded. Pretty simple. Pretty clear cut, too.
I don't get the difference pls explain
@@humzdon4life basically don't leave the crease u til your sure the bowler has bowled or else you get out
@@humzdon4life Following rules is following spirit. Simple. Playing against the rule like nonstrikers is breaking spirit
Most of these would have still been in the crease had the bowler bowled the balls. Its because they have broken the rythm of their action to stop turn around and and break the bails. That has allowed the batsmen to move out of the creaes.
@@humble7447 Only fools leave before ball release0
everyone is boss untill Ravichandran Ashwin walks in.
😂😂
Legend says batsmen stand at long off when he’s bowling...
@@Bigbrodonateddollarsthroughsup correct bhai
The force of Vinoo Mankad is strong with him.
@@ajitmadane7377 thankyou ajit bhai
Who is here after Angelo Mathews Time out dismissal in CWC 2023😇
Me
Me
Yo
Not the same thing btw buddy.
If you are, make sure to watch jarod kimber's mankad video for better context on that, it really is quite helpful to understand.
1:01 I love how casually he says”Howzat”
Bruh it was a proper how was that not even howzat
Maybe its because i'm so used to LBW appeals being so over the top, but that was the most mellow appeal i've ever heard. Defidently caught me off guard.
"how's dat?" 🤣
Empire: coool
@@uk4490 That Ump as probably thinking: "Thank God they didn't scream in my face again"
Aussies talking about the spirit of the game is a shame😅
If it is in the rules, why is it against the spirit?
If I am standing halfway of the pitch, that's undue advantage for the batsman. And that's sloppy. I really dont understand the fuss.
Dude. You are supposed to be standing inside the crease before the ball is bowled. Why aren't you?
Soumyadip Mukhopadhyay exactly my thoughts. Don’t want to get mankadded? Stay in your crease!!!
Hn hn thik h thik h chl chl apne baap ko mat sikha😂😂😂😂
@@ashutoshverma7240 Kaun hain aap ke pitaji? 🙄
I agree with you if they are way through the pitch
If you're half way down the pitch then yep fair enough but 2 to 3 steps then smash the bowler
2:34 When your 5000 lines of code gives multiple errors
Gives more than the number of lines
F
Clearly you haven't ever written a piece of code, have you. No one write 5000 lines of code and then checks for errors.
Manoj PVR codes of applications can go far more than 5k lines
He means no one writes 5000 line of codes straight eithout running the program and checking of error
2:34 He is be like “So you guys not let me hit the ball, well I’ll hit the ground”🤣
Remembering Vinoo Mankad...
The person who's sense of humour started this beautiful way of sending batsmen home... ❤❤❤
It's s shame
Just like your name says noob ..lol shut up no one cares
@@Noob_Khan but a rule 🙂
It's not a shame , you moron it's a rule.
@@Noob_Khan Indeed, it's a shame for batsmen to leave their crease when they're at risk of getting bowled. I agree with you
When leg is inches outside the crease.. Its not against the spirit of the game. Its a no ball n rewarded free hit.. But mankading is against d spirit of d game.. Lmao.. Hypocrisy 😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂 Bro You Nailed It 😂😂😂😂😂
Its a voice of bowler pls listen it😂
It's a free hit only and 1 run ..But for Batsman it is his wicket . There is a difference .. it's not equal .. If it penalizes the batsman by deducting some of his runs then it would have been comparable ..
@@Dare-Knight Lol, if batsmen are stealing runs then there must be risk attached to it, and risk for batsmen is his wicket. Reducing runs opens a whole new chapter. Should not we also bring a rule then that a catch out can be revoked if batmen agree to get 50 runs reduced? And think of a bowler, taking wicket is his achievement, he takes a wicket but umpire gives no ball for over stepping or field constraints not matched, and everything lost for bowler.
@@chesswithsagar hypocrisy ki bhi ek seema hoti hai....
It's not against the spirit of the game, it's a part of it, deal with it
Technically it is perfectly allowed, but morally it really isn't cricket
@@xp3r670 bro morally non striker coming down the crease even before the ball is delivered isn't morally right too...he is just skipping the 2-3 steps for no reason...why all the perks should be in favour of batsmen...i mean this wont even count as a perk still....
@@tejasghadigaokar5107 i understand where you are coming from, but everyone walks early, not everyone hits them out
@@xp3r670 bro then y dont u use the same logic and argument when wicketkeeper stumping the striker when generally batsmen tend to stand on crease not inside the crease....
3:34 that was a disgrace doh. It was a U-19 WC semifinal at the final moments of a game under a climactic situation with one wicket left and he did this
This shows that buttler never learn from his mistakes 😂
3:13 First ever underarm action!
The art:
The artist: R Ashwin
Not Ashwin
It's Kapil Dev
@@yasinshaikh6712
Fuck off
The chut
The chutya Ashwin 🤣
The canvas butler
Ab se Mai pitch ke beech mein khada hoke khelunga Cricket.............mankading is a law and it is not a crime to follow it
2:34
RIP Bat. You lived a good life.
underrated
@@fracturedskull7489 FRACTURED BAT
Bat punished. Offence: fail to stay in crease
Mankading in recent years has been good for cricket. The game over time has continually turned into a batsman's game. With the mankad, batsmen have become mroe aware of staying inside their crease till the delivery has actually left the bowlers hands and that's fair. A few years ago commentators and fans may have called it against the spirit of the game and a douchebag move. But in time it has serviced bowlers more fairly.
Except many, many people still do call it against the spirit of the game and a douchebag move. Personally, I would like to see every bowler run out every batter this way at every opportunity, but the reality is that that doesn't happen. The reality is that there is an unspoken agreement that bowlers will not do so and every time a bowler doesn't run out a batter this way when they could, they implicitly endorse that agreement. It is this inconsistency that I have a problem with. If anything is to change with regards to the attitude towards this type of run out, someone needs to start doing something different. If it just happens every now and again, the same argument will happen every time. I'd like to see a bowler or even a team state publicly that they will run out every batter who backs up too far without warning at every available opportunity. Some people may grumble but, when it happens, they won't be able to say that they weren't warned. If some players start doing this, others will follow and, in time, peoples attitudes will actually change. If no one does anything differently, why would they expect different results?
@@wunnell it’s fair enough. People never complain that the batsman is cheating by trying to gain space down the wicket, but the simple fact is that he is every time he steps out of his crease before the ball is delivered.
That being said and in addition to what you said, I would warn the opposition before every single match of the intention to use the tactic; then any batsman who is dismissed will only have their selves to blame and won’t be able to hide behind the rote response of ‘it’s not within the spirit of the game’.
@@wunnell mankading is good for the sport, the "spiwit" is not part of the equation. Since the rule applies even after countless protests then it must be useful. If anything, not following the rules would be unsportsmanlike.
@@someonejustsomeone1469
*"the "spiwit" is not part of the equation"*
Of course it is. Maybe it shouldn't be but I think you'll find that the vast majority of players - even those who have run out batters this way - consider the spirit of cricket to be important. The issue is that it's not something that's well-defined. Just like in life in general, most people consider morality to be important but different people have different ideas about what is and is not moral, so the spirit of cricket is important to most players but different players have different ideas about what is within the spirit of the game and what isn't.
@@oleggorky906
*"People never complain that the batsman is cheating by trying to gain space down the wicket"*
Of course they do. Plenty of people do. It's just not the same people who complain about bowlers running out batters backing up.
The thing is, most batters aren't specifically trying to gain an advantage, which is part of the reason that it's not viewed as harshly as it could be. Many (most?) batters do exactly what Charlie Dean did. If you watch the side-on replay in particular, you can see that she watches the bowler until she's just about into her delivery stride and then she looks up at other batter. She starts moving forward and drags her bat with the apparent intention of leaving her ground at about the same moment as the bowler releases the ball. Obviously some batters are more conservative than others and/or better judges but I would suggest that very few are deliberately trying to gain an advantage. This is why many believe that a warning should be given at least before actually running the batter out, because most batters don't even know they're leaving their ground early. It's like a bowler missing out on a wicket due to a no-ball when they have been over-stepping consistently without it being called.
Love the reaction in the 3rd clip.
More players should do this when dismissed in test matches 👍
😂
2:34 forget about cricket, that guy should join anger management course ASAP.
🤣🤣😂
hahaha
Lol
Can anyone confirm whether that's real or for a sketch, everything looks legit but its so over the top and immediate reaction.
@@OtterSC2 it was real
2:34 this could've made headlines if it would have happened in international cricket.😂
krishna pal wouldn’t have happened in international cricket . There are manners
@@incognitos4342 really? Didn't you see what happened after u-19 men's finals?
@@siriusblack3285 that's not international cricket per se, that's a bunch of young punks acting like morons after they won an irrelevant junior cup
Spac18 somebodys mad that it takes skill to win a world cup
@@_.habibitingz._ dats world Cup for u, rest in peace
2:34 Y this dood is so calm😂😂😂
"Spirit of the game" in cricket allows the non striker to get an unfair advantage. Needless to say, only the bowler is bound by the "spirit of the game"
Do umpires give warning to bowlers before giving a no ball? How many times we have seen wickets to No balls does the umpire say I will give this one out but next ball i will give a No ball? No! So why should batsmen be first warned for playing unfairly. Its out coz its out. Simple as that.
Umpire warns in test cricket
@@abinashgogoi9575 You mad?
@@abinashgogoi9575 only sometimes and NOT when a wicket is taken.
@@abinashgogoi9575 no they dont. They warn when they are really close to bowling outside the line. They dont warn you when your foot is outside the line
After giving no ball... Bowler is allowed to ball.... But batsman is not allowed after mankading
I truly hate this notion of "it s against the spirit of the game". Nonsense. It's THE most avoidable wicket: Just don't leave your crease until the ball is gone. It's one of the first things you're taught in Juniors is how to back up properly.
Stop hiding behind the antiquated notion of "spirit of the game" and actually run between the wickets properly without the advantage of sneaking ahead of the crease in the bowlers action. Genuine wicket, play on!
Only against the spirit of the game if no warning has been given. If it continues after the warning fair play.
@@patorr69 Most bowlers will stop and warn the first time, to show that hey! I could have gotten you out but i'm warning you first because it's not a respectful out. After that warning is given. if the batsman continues to do it, then it's on him.
@@belongda6032 you are not a 5 yr old kid that i need to warn you. Stay inside the crease ffs
If its in the rules it's fair
Leaving your crease before the ball is bowled is against the spirit of the game. If 1cm out of crease is fine, then why not 22 yards?
Where is Mathews "sportsmanship" and dignity?
This is cheating you idiot. Batter have to be within the crease until the ball is released. Learn the difference.
He warned him first
Rules are rules, just like in Shakib's appeal. Nothing wrong in any of these cases.
@@quixoticfiend9274 this is what I'm talking about. If its ruled out than why everyone picking a side to mock sakib? He did what our team needed the most.
@@quixoticfiend9274do you still think shakib and the umpires were right!? Really? We all know what kind of a player shakib is.
2:34 *guy is legend*
2:34 imagine Kohli doing that! 😂
Imagine somebody doing it to kholi 😂
Anurag kumar Kohli never leaves the crease.. there are many videos when bowler is about to bowl and Kohli at the non-striker, he always leaves the crease after the bowler release the ball, he even aware of the batsman at the strike if he plays the straight drive close to stump, that’s why he’s champ!!
@@aakashbhatiya953 he is talking about the guy losing his temper and destroying his bat..
Deii punda
@@anuragkumar1015 😁😁😂😂
The first one was fair enough, he gave him a warning because he was three steps out of the crease before he was bowling, proceeded to continue so the bowler ran him out.
Kapil Dev warned three times
In fact he warned him twice before doing this
Well, then every first-time bowler bowls no balls, we start giving a warning first.
@@Subhash14999 yeah my mistake . Thats what i meant actually.
Pretty much all of them were fair.
When stumping is a thing, why can't this be.
It is a thing, its just considered a dog act if there’s no warning
The main reason it becomes a problem (against the spirit of the game) is those instances when the bowler tries to fool the batsman into thinking they are just about to bowl the ball before ending their bowling action prematurely to take the bails off.
@@AttilaThebung "Please give a warning before stumping, give Him some time to return back to the crease."
@@SingularityHRT Stumping is all batsman's fault. The batsman can't wait for bowler to finish the ball and then run.. What if the bowler just stops? They are different. I'm not saying bowler shouldn't run the batsman out that way.. I'm just saying Stumping and mankading are different.
@@AttilaThebung Its considered dog act stealing ground. Law41 unfairplay : Nonstrikers are the dogs , breaking spirit
Surprisly Sakib took the Revenge From Mathews tommorow😂😂
2:34 The guy's reacting as if he's trying to kill a snake on the ground! 😂
😂
Rumor has it that the few snakes around the ground were never seen again since this video dropped.
2:34
Lol the batsman is triggered
You don’t say
Bruder Gamer no he isn't
Ahahaha
He is very calm 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Look carefully, its Hulk smashing Thor.
Who Came After "Shakib vs Mathews" incident😂?
Ah! Mankading the one move in cricket that always kills the spirit of the cricket, the spirit which usually sleeps through sledging, crowd abuse, cheating, ball tampering and bodyline tactics.
2 minutes silence for who think mankading is against spirit of the game but stumping out is not.
Again 1 minute silence for them as ICC has removed is "against game of spirit" bshit.
Leaving crease early is also not in the spirit of the game. Don't leave the crease before bowler releases the ball. That's it.
Butter was warned by the bowler for going too far too early so he only has himself to blame.
2:34 dont ask me why i dont lend my bat🤬
😂😂
😂😂
😂😂
😂😂
😂😂
Why should the spirit of the game only apply to bowlers? I don't see anything wrong with Mankadding when the batsman is a repeat offender and exploiting your courtesy. Now that's against the SPIRIT of the game!
When day by day cricket Is getting batsman favourite..this is good for the bowler...👍👍👍
In April 2019 the MCC announced, "There is a slight change to Law 41.16, which should further confirm the principle, established in the 2017 Code, that it is the non-striker’s duty to remain in his/her ground until the bowler has released the ball". Please read that last phrase carefully, "it is the non-striker’s duty to remain in his/her ground until the bowler has released the ball". These are called "The Rules". If you don't want to play by them, find another sport.
So very true! The spirit of the game makes sense when a normal run is being taken and the batsman has a bad fall before getting to the crease or if someone edges the ball and walks off. When it's clearly stated in the rules that it is a legitimate way of being dismissed I wonder why they are so many still touting the spirit of the game as an excuse. And for all intents and purposes a batsman is well within his rights to be a few feet out of the crease as long as he has his bat behind the crease, what more leeway is needed than that!
Actually, they use the term "Laws".
@Fred Fernackerpan The spirit of the game is to not take unfair advantage of another player. Batters creep over the crease because they know the bowler is wholly focused at that moment upon their delivery action with their eyes on the striker. They are taking unfair advantage of another player whose concentration is necessarily elsewhere. That does not appear to be in the 'spirit' of the game to me.
It is the non-striker's right to do this action if they want to, it is not considered unlawful in cricket, even thought it is not in the spirit if the game. It is not unlawful for a batter to take a risk. Given that , it is petulant and tiresome for them to complain when they are run out when taking that risk, ie when the bowler does notices it and runs them out.
On other occasions when a batter takes a risky run and is subsequently run out we don't expect the fielding captain to give them another chance - they took a risk and it didn't pay off. Same goes for this. However, I do think the batter behaviour in these cases is worse because they are taking advantage of the bowler who is almost 'defenceless' in stopping them because the bowler is necessarily consumed at that instant with concentrating on bowling the ball.
@Fred Fernackerpan You say, "The intention is not to get the non-striking batsman out by underhand means". Equally, the intention of a batter is to score runs in a fair manner, not for the batter to score runs by underhand means. No?
@Fred Fernackerpan Would it be the same for regular run-outs and stumpings? On your logic I gather it should be. Also, on your logic of sanction fitting the dismissal, being stumped because you are out by centimetre because you accidentally fractionally dragged your foot out of the crease should have a different outcome to if you were stumped by a metre because you charged the bowler and missed.
I still believe in the end, batters take risks all the time, and if the batter is dismissed, so be it, end of story really. If the batter doesn't want to take a risk then they need to ensure they don't leave their crease until it is safe to do so. Pretty straightforward really; I am not even really sure why it is up for discussion.
2:34 When u realise that even Mr. Bean had a girlfriend and u are still single💀
Mr bean had a girlfriend 😂😂😂
@@nishantkumarsingh8964 wo bhi thoda usi type ki thi
The most brutal one of course took place in 1893 Champaner, against Tipu who was doing the running for Ismail. The match ended well though, a dramatic winning six on the last ball, just in time before the rain started. I think there was a tax issue surrounding the match as well but I was not paying attention to that.
Hahahaha. I saw what you did there. Good one. 😀
Read through the whole thing twice before realising the reference
We should rewrite the rules so the umpire says 1 short every time the non-striker doesn't run the full distance after the bowler lands. We could eliminate the early starts and the controversy in a month.
Really good idea, wow
2:33 when she friendzones you, after eating up all your pocket money
Hahaha you remind me my collage days 😂😂I was stupic nice guy
Salary ?
3:32
Bowler : I'mma end this man's whole carrier
Batsman: Who are u messing with kid???
I saw the last one live on TV. Zim vs WI. Zimbabwe really managed to bring the match very close. 3 required off 6 and with one wicket remaining. Really a sad moment for them.
They lost because of 1 idiot called Ngarva.. He shouldhave been in crease..He shouldhave watching foot or ball..He has 2eyes.. U steal ground .. Then cry hard when u lose wicket.. They got what they deserve.. Feel sad for bowlers who get cheated by nonstrikers
Sachin had no business imposing his unwanted opinion here. If the bowler sticks to the rules, the captain should back him/her.
Anyone noticed that
Ashwin does the most mankading and jos buttler gets out in such a way
How many times ashwin has done it to now
How dare you comment on JB
@@aryanpatil49 why is he your father
@@arijitdas8028 No
I am his big fan. Though he is victim of such mankading, look at his records.
Ignore spelling error
@@aryanpatil49 actually ashwin is my favorite...
He is always underestimated...
That's why I was furious
Batsman cheats or takes unfair advantage or takes a risk to get an extra metre, and the bowler gets him out. What is the problem? We don't warn a batsman of a slower ball, why warn the batsman? There should be no disrespect for a bowler doing this. The disrespect is the batter trying to cheat/take unfair advantage.
backing up isn't an unfair advantage, it is completely normal. you've just got a batsman out without even bowling the ball, how can that be?
@@matthewclayton2284 Backing up is normal once the bowler has released the ball, but backing up and moving outside the crease before a bowler has bowled is not 'completely normal'. Everyone knows the rules of cricket, which state that if a batter leaves their crease before the ball is bowled then they can be run out; end of story really don't you think? If batsmen try to take advantage of the bowler not noticing then they take are taking risk - if they get run out then that was the risk they took. A bowler has every right to dismiss a batter within the rules - that's what rules are for!
Whether someone bowled a ball or not is irrelevant. A batsman can be given out if they obstruct a fielder or obstruct the ball, and those dismissals usually occur well after a ball is bowled. A batsman can be 'timed out' if they take too long to get onto the field of play after a wicket falls. These are just a few ways a batter can be given out which are not directly linked to bowling a ball.
Peter Vadiveloo it’s against the spirit of the game
@@boydoz8264 Batters trying to gain an unfair advantage is against the spirit of the game.
A metre is fine, an inch is not.
this is the only time when umpire asks other players whether to give him out or not...
umpire be like, *"aye du kya out isko?? bol na bol na"* 😅
এই সেই পাপ টা
যেটা পাপের ফল ৯ বছর পর এসে পেয়েছে 😂
Butler has got 2 times
Ashwin has done 3 times
Ashwin has done it much more
@@richjhart so that shows how lowly he is and will do anything to win
^Bitch pls..how is he lowly?the batsman gets an advantage to take extra runs by starting to run before the ball is even bowled...if that's not against the spirit of the game then running the batsman out isn't either.
@@shadowronin2943 Both are
I mean all of them are
I really have no respect for mankading people
@@nisinduperera7130
No one needs your respect because "vioice of cricket" supported it and even don Bradman
Rule is to stay in crease untill ball has been bowled
Ashwin be like :-
Mai karu to saale character dheela h😂😂
That last to 3rd one was amazing
2:54 I thought the umpire was giving the middle finger...... 🤣🤣🤣
Jos butler got out 2 times in the same way my god 😂😂
When batsman goes ahead before the ball is bowled it's spirit of the game 😂
The last one LMAO .. its brilliant. Didn’t even go into his stride ran straight to run him out lolll
This is so easy and I don't know why it causes such controversy. Stay in your crease until the ball is bowled or you run the risk of being run out.
Certainly polite to give a warning though.
The art:
The artist: Vinod mankad
Good to see this after Charlotte Dean mankad
Who is come here to see matthews malkad after his timeout weaket today bangladesh vs sri lahkan match
Technically, that's OUT. No problem.
What exactly does the rules say about this?
@@manujohn99 No harsh feelings....
@@manujohn99 this is where I'm confused. As far as I knew you could only perform this sort of run out before the bowling action has begun. Not midway through it. The last one is the only fair one within the rules, although ridiculously close and against the spirit of the game
@@VallianceRS yaa bowlers are breaking their process of bowling midway............not fair
@@VallianceRS not before bowling action before ball release.
2:50
Just look at Kapil Dev he gave 3 warnings and was just fed up with the runner.
History repeats again Angela Mathous. Timed Out
The art : Mankading
Pioneer: Vinod Mankad
Picasso: Ravi Chandran Ashwin
Lol nice try lundians, Anyone can mankade, it ain't no art
Why is it always my boy buttler
Your boy🤔😂🤣
Jos Buttler deserved to be mankinded 2 nd time as he is very notified of the fact he should not leave his crease
Because your boy crosses the line more often 😂😂
@@ajithms8757 Exactly !
Your boy??!! For how much did you buy him?
Its a tactical move quite good but some dudes/dudines found it against some sort of spirit so people are discouraged.Mankading is kind of a feint and is a move that you're opponent forgets about in the heat of the game .Hope its used more effectively and also in crunch situations
& this angelo fu*ckin mathews asked about the spirit of the game for sakib's decision! 😂😂😂😂😂
Great game awareness skills by these bowlers. 👍. Shame on the batters who call themselves professional players and don’t known the rules of the game that every 12 year old who played the game knows.
2:56 love Kapil dev’s aggression . We miss leaders like you who would win another WC for India . Respect to dhoni.
i remember that match.. kapil had given 3 official warnings to peter kirsten in that series before doing in this match..
It's not aggression it's unnecessary aggression making his own image down
Kapil Dev is a match fixer and a cheater
@@rakeshbulnani6782 3 warning Dene k baad bhi
@@hashenchamath6690 lmao, no u aussie
Ashwin and butler -the two legend of mankading 😀😀😀
2:34 When PS5 get Out of stock in 10 seconds
The first one was so genuine SL vs ENG
2:30 is the best
If you've warned the batsman before and he didn't listen.........then can he really complain the 2nd time round?
but ashwin idioit did'nt even do that.shame!
Is non striker is a kid to warn ? He should stay inside the crease. No need to cry afterwards if you are not doing it.
There is no need of warning
Is a bowler warned for bowling a noball by the umpire or will he just declare it as noball. Similarly when a nonstriker steps out he should not be warned but he had to be made out.
Also bowlers oversteping the crease will be beneficial to the batting team. Similarly nonstriker stepping out of crease should be beneficial to the bowling team.simple!
@@shahjadaosama7701 acc to your logic , bumrah would warn every batsman before bowling a Yorker..
Hey a Yorker coming ahead 😂😂
@@sohamjuneja3440 😂😂😂😂
Act like you are going to ball, in last millisecond you do this, Appreciate it
2:31 this is amazing.
Seeing buttler :
Nobody:
Spinners: it's time to mankad him...
Victim of mankad-butter
Well behaviour of 2 legends sachin n sewag respect frm srilanka
I think it is the best way to show spirit of the game....if bowler is not allowed for an inch then to cross then spirit of game says batsman should also not be allowed
Alternative title: a couple of people who aren't fun at parties
I always thought that the bowler had to swap the ball from his bowling hand to his other hand to do this.
The amount of frustration inside the non-striker 🌋
so this is where the "spirit of the game" argument comes from
Karma back 😂😂😂Sri vs ban
Huh?
When I was a kid. We had this weird rule to touch the ground with the ball first then hit the wickets for mankadding😂
Why do I think that this rule makes sense
Yeah, exactly. When we played as kids we had this rule too. Of touching the ball to the ground before hitting the stumps, while Mankadding 😛
@@neelkanthbk or else the wicket wouldn't count😂. Man we were strict with the rules.😂
Haha, yes😀
@@hbinitials7 Man as weird as it may sound but honestly that's an excellent rule and makes sense.
When we played cricket in childhood some bowlers will simply go with the bowling stride and fake a bowling action and throw it back at stumps.
As this thing became popular 50% of time bowlers started faking action just to get the non-striker out.
It started getting very dull & annoying.
So we too started this ground touching rule like others and soon this nuisance stopped.
I love how all the bowlers look at the umpires after they do it 😂
Last one was just fucking cheeky, he didn’t even go that far out
2:34 WAIT...WHAT 🤣
I can't understand why mankading is against the spirit of game, when bowler bowls a inch ahead of the line, he ill be punished without mercy
So you're saying that a bowler running at over 20kmph should be held guilty for putting his foot an inch beyond the crease but a batsman who's supposed to be standing still until the ball is released should be given ROOM FOR ERROR?
@Zanaki Senkai Does your asshole get jealous of all the shit that comes out of your mouth? The batsman's job is to stay inside the fucking crease until the ball has been released. During the last overs a no ball can completely change the outcome of the game. Room for error my foot, play by the fucking rules if you care so much about sPirIt oF tHe game cause nothing's more sportsman like than abiding by the rules.
Ravi Ashwin The Legend of Mankind
I support mankading....bowlers should have something cricket is not only for batsmen
Ashwin: that guy that abuses mankad
Buttler: that guy that always gets mankad
what if the there is a run out chance and the batsmen just survives by inches due to the start he took before the ball was bowled ? Will the batsman walk just because he took a start in advance ? What kind of spirit of game is it ?
Oh Buttler and mankading never gets old
I think even in his bedroom he will draw a crease and stays in there
2:34 south indian batsman is triggered