COH2 FPV De-rusting the brenmando strat

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
  • Company of Heroes 2 First Person View Game British Forces Mobile Assault vs Ostheer Jaeger Infantry on Amily Fields
    Enjoy the content? Support me on Patreon / tightrope or Donate:
    streamlabs.com...
    Send your replays for casting to tightropegaming@gmail.com or pm on coh2.org: www.coh2.org/us... Top 200 only (Patreon exempt), 3v3 & 4v4 are ok, though 1v1 & 2v2 are preferred
    Follow me on twitter @tightropegaming or on twitch / tightropexilo

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @中华民国万岁-c4g
    @中华民国万岁-c4g 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Nice cromwell play though that cromwell bounce probably saved your game.

    • @blackhole5173
      @blackhole5173 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      你的名字用簡體也太犯規
      剛剛入手英國,有啥建議的嗎?

    • @shawnheng8646
      @shawnheng8646 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blackhole5173 英军在盟军里坦克最强 但是步兵本身数值很低 经历了太多削弱 现在必须蹲坑或者站绿盾才能打

  • @EstellammaSS
    @EstellammaSS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Whenever I tried using recovery sappers instead of sections I always find them to be a bit too squishy to be effective on open maps like this. More often then not I found myself building one section before the 2 engineers to hold the line better and of course more sandbags. Then transitioning into either commandos or a sniper to relieve some front line duty off the engineers since they really start suffering when Axis infantry hit vet and weapon upgrade

    • @smartassdroid5149
      @smartassdroid5149 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Better off making Vickers mg than a section. Getman troops close in, either you dir or run anyway, at least with the MG you get suppression, then kill with Engineers.

  • @aziouss2863
    @aziouss2863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Vet 3 cromwell is just a spectacle.
    It is so fast that even with an engine crit you don't feel to bad using it on the frontline still XD
    Such an underrated tank.
    There were some opportunities to use the hunt ability too!

    • @jackobrien47
      @jackobrien47 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does hunt do exactly?

    • @fullfrontal3462
      @fullfrontal3462 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jackobrien47 more penetration

    • @livenreloaded
      @livenreloaded 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jackobrien47 Better accuracy on the move and 1 more buff that I forgot though I could be wrong

    • @angels2online
      @angels2online 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Increases penetration and moving accuracy by 20% and detects vehicles within 60 range in the FoW for 25 seconds.
      But I can't verify if that's accurate.

  • @angels2online
    @angels2online 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A rather splendid Cromwell ace, taking out 3 panzers! But really, I think Comet needs more abilities.

    • @hkazxc7309
      @hkazxc7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      no lol crew grenade and WP are good enough

    • @piotrk3829
      @piotrk3829 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you want MORE abilities on it? it's got war speed, grenade, smoke and a WP shell plus increased sight already lol

  • @albertosara416
    @albertosara416 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    32:00
    they were the bravest of mandos, they were the cheekiest of mandos

  • @eeros2654
    @eeros2654 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks again to providing fun COH2 coverage!

  • @etzete7455
    @etzete7455 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 31:10 you looked at your infantry section for a few seconds to dodge a grenade. That was insane micro.
    Why did you looked at the unit in trouble at exactly the right moment? Is there a trick/strategy? Gut feeling? Or was it just lucky?
    If theres some secret to it other than experience Id really like to know.
    Great game btw

  • @ultramanorb701
    @ultramanorb701 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    17:49 I'm surprised he didn't try to drive back and snipe your tank 😮

    • @noxrige
      @noxrige 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Was probably worried about the AT gun getting recrewed and getting a shot off.

    • @ultramanorb701
      @ultramanorb701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@noxrige I see

  • @sgtsmith501
    @sgtsmith501 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Reminder to use the *hunt* ability on Cromwell's hunting down tanks. Between that and focused gunnery on the M4A3E8 neither get used much at all despite the potency

  • @massivegangster
    @massivegangster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great game, felt there were some moments when you could have utilized the crew repairs, sitting on 160+ munis and then would spend 1-3 minutes waiting and repairing. Any reason you didnt use the ability at all?

  • @WaKaSaWaKaSa
    @WaKaSaWaKaSa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Impressive comeback. You have grit. I'd probably had been malding too much about that engineer wipe to come back like you did. Nice job

  • @JMTTM
    @JMTTM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't figure out the best way to use tactical map, as in incorporating it into my game, since I need to press the button 0, and the button 0 is all the way to the right, while the keys i use is on the left side of the keyboard. How do you do it?

    • @UrDaddy4Real
      @UrDaddy4Real 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Auto hotkeys. You can rebind keys to keyboard. Spacebar is most commonly used for that.
      Or simply bind it to your mouse button

    • @JMTTM
      @JMTTM 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UrDaddy4Real Sorry for asking more, how do I rebind keys to keyboard? I only see classic hotkeys off.

    • @Spiderbloke
      @Spiderbloke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JMTTM CoH2, for whatever reason, doesn't let you rebind keys. You have to use an outside program, the popular one being AutoHotkeys. That will let you bind functions to any key or mouse button you want. Then you can put the tac map somewhere more helpful.
      You may want to use Grid Keys too. It puts all the unit abilities on the same 4x3 grid set of keys. It's generally easier for most people to use than classic, where abilities are all over the keyboard.

  • @CtrlAltRetreat
    @CtrlAltRetreat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That bounce at 23mins had to have been amazingly frustrating to your opponent.

  • @RahmatTalua
    @RahmatTalua 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My god cromwell
    That thing moving so fast with burning engines

  • @losgillis
    @losgillis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the WASP sometimes valid in 1v1s or should you just forget about it ?

    • @tightropegaming
      @tightropegaming  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I generally wouldn't bother against ostheer unless they are doing a strategy with no snares.

    • @losgillis
      @losgillis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tightropegaming gotcha. Thx mate.!

    • @hkazxc7309
      @hkazxc7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hard to get values out of a WASP in 1v1 unless you are playing against a level 3 opponent

  • @rmartin987
    @rmartin987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think you got hit with bad RNG? The commandos seem to be underwhelming despite your well played camo attacks and muni invested. Despite low health I think I only saw you start getting wipes once they hit VET3 while also being upgraded. The Soviet Elite close range squads seem to be better despite having worse or no camo and Falls just seem to be better and come earlier. Commandos just seem to be really inconsistent on dealing damage while spawning with 3 units at CP3.

  • @Evilstealer404
    @Evilstealer404 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are Brens terrible on infantry sections or is there some other reason for them to chill without the new weapons?

    • @Jeff_C45
      @Jeff_C45 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My guess is he wants the munitions for comet, gammon bombs, and artillery. In this strat the infantry section is not a strong combat unit because it skips bolster. So it is really just used for capping and calling in artillery. So munitions better spent on other things.

    • @aziouss2863
      @aziouss2863 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah 5 man section brens are good it is just not his playstyle.
      They have the best anti infantry damage of all the typical frontline units they just lack snares so they have a huge flaw.

  • @gensdupays
    @gensdupays 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome game ! When you are able to conserve your tank its a hole another game. Good job !

  • @noxrige
    @noxrige 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    7:04 What the? How did he not even drop a model through all of that fire?

    • @aziouss2863
      @aziouss2863 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Channeling the power of infantry sections.

  • @mingyuhuang8944
    @mingyuhuang8944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You gotta have the sapper 10% experience boost Intel bulletin if you wanna play this strat. They are the backbone of the strat for capping and surprise wipes... They are honestly great once they get to vet 3 which is much easier with the Intel on

  • @lGuzikl
    @lGuzikl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why in your opinion is WASP carrier not used more often?

    • @oosyrag
      @oosyrag 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you can flame them, they can faust you. So you only get a big advantage with flame if there are a lot of buildings you want to keep the enemy out of.

    • @lGuzikl
      @lGuzikl 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oosyrag Oh, I thought that wasp outranges faust, even it it's just a bit. And wasp has better damage on the move I believe so I was wondering if the highers risk and more micro demand might be worth the payoff.

    • @oosyrag
      @oosyrag 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lGuzikl Maybe it does (I thought they were the same), but you just gotta get that much closer anyway. Just saying the big advantage from wasp comes from bonus damage to garrisons, so if you're not going to be taking advantage of that why go wasp? Either way the difference is marginal and they're both viable so whatever floats your boat. The bigger consideration for me is that both the vickers and bren have focus fire. Killing one model at a time efficiently is big against expensive units like grens. It irks me to no end when a full squad of grens retreats at 25% health and gets to heal back to full for free basically.

  • @NathanielKrige
    @NathanielKrige 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good game!
    Too bad, we didn't saw officer's charge + brenmandos.

  • @solaufein1374
    @solaufein1374 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, opponent is pretty good it seems

  • @Ashmole3
    @Ashmole3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dang you had some good RNG this game.

  • @ECFRG752685
    @ECFRG752685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    UKF has everything usf should have. MG and AT gun are natural part of the building, you don't need to give up one to have the other like all other factions except USF. Your initial infantry is useful at the end of the game like all other factions except the USF. Your main tank is useful and you feel it's worth having yourself against a tiger. The weapon upgrade for the infantry is fair, 45 ammo.

    • @xslz2820
      @xslz2820 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      have you used the mg and at gun of brits before? they're a fucking joke. But yeah their tanks are really good and have alot of utility

    • @ECFRG752685
      @ECFRG752685 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xslz2820 MG and AT gun of british is better in stats and in game use than USF counterpart. i Ever use MG and At of british.

    • @xslz2820
      @xslz2820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ECFRG752685 the 6 pounder has better pen than the M1 but it has horseshit accuracy. And the vickers rarely suppresses with the first burst. Keep in mind the vickers burst is long as fuck and STILL doesn't suppress. It's the worst MG in the game. Granted, the faction would probably be way too broken if it had decent support weapons ontop of great infantry and tanks. How could you possibly argue that Vickers is better than 50. cal? 50 cal is arguably the best machine gun after Dshk. And the vet 1 ability of the M1 makes it the second best AT gun in my opinion (#1 being zis)

    • @ECFRG752685
      @ECFRG752685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@xslz2820 50cal have less arch of rang, the main function is MG is denie one terrain, than MG is less efective for this. i use Vickers and ever pin enemy infantry. AT have better range, better PEN, Better vet. U not need wast Amun to him do some damage on one axis tank. best MG of game is MG 42.

    • @felixyuen8225
      @felixyuen8225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@xslz2820 That's 3 billion percent wrong.
      Brit AT gun had the highest accuracy of all AT guns of the 5 factions for the first four or five years Brits were released because the reasoning was that they didn't have snares, and needed the bonus accuracy. The balance team nerfed 6 pounder to have the same accuracy stats as other AT guns after giving sappers anti-tank grenades 2+ years ago.
      Right now all 5 factions' AT guns have the same accuracy on paper, but raketen has the lowest real accuracy because it starts suffering long range and medium range penalties at shorter distances, and has the lowest gun profile + slowest projectile, resulting in a much higher chance of terrain collision and a lower chance of misses becoming scattered-hits.
      Vickers does suck because it has the worst suppression amongst all hmgs, that much I agree, but the nonsense about 6-pounder is insanely wrong.

  • @louisnel894
    @louisnel894 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Grenade landed on your MG it seems, The mortar killed your Squad. not the nade. 13m 50

  • @Jeff_C45
    @Jeff_C45 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    TR 2 questions.
    1. How do you decide Centaur vs Cromwell?
    2. Many top players avoid brens on commandos to keep them close range specialists and use them in more of a scout and ambush role. Are commandos better with brens always, or is this other strategy worth something?

    • @tightropegaming
      @tightropegaming  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is simple really. If you need anti tank get the cromwell, if you need anti infantry & air get the centaur. Just about realising the conditions for that.
      Most players make infantry sections so already have the long range fighting covered. This build has no long range after the UC dies without the brenmandos.

    • @felixyuen8225
      @felixyuen8225 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      2) Brens on commandos are the most cost-efficient upgrade in the game.
      For 45 munitions, a bren-mando does 12 dps while an Obersoldaten with lmg34 does 13.4dps. For 90 munitions you basically get 24 max range dps, which puts them almost even with the entire Obers squad with lmg upgraded, while still having super camo and 3 smgs. Their long range dps is also significantly higher than the double lmgs that paratroopers get for 120 munitions.

  • @AimBotGuy
    @AimBotGuy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    mines win games almost for him, losing UC so early almost cost your match

  • @sylwesterjankowski8845
    @sylwesterjankowski8845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    GG

  • @mayhemsnowgames7265
    @mayhemsnowgames7265 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    no chilli

  • @jayros4269
    @jayros4269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why don't more people play Brits are they under powered?

    • @insomniagaming9588
      @insomniagaming9588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hmm...from my experience brits are the strongest faction on paper...and the best faction on paper...and the most fun on paper...and then you play them and want to cry all game xD something is really fucky about them

    • @soyzabean555
      @soyzabean555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@insomniagaming9588 The really good Brit players are high on tea, that's the only explanation ahaha

    • @insomniagaming9588
      @insomniagaming9588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soyzabean555 yeah probably :D

    • @hkazxc7309
      @hkazxc7309 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      they are not underpowered, they just have a very "odd" way to play it.
      I would say soviet is more powerful because they have literally everything by game design