A big errata or alteration for me would be retroactively adding updated Typing to Digimon that got new/extra typing in later release (BT09 Magnamon X is not a Free type but BT16 is) or alternative Digivolution requirements over tribal archetypes to bypass colour restrictions, etc. Like all Agumons should be able to digivolve over any Koomon for example.
I would honestly be so down for a set that retroactively fixed all of those cards. Problem is that it would tank the value of existing cards. Would be an awesome errata tho
I would love for the old hexablaumon to gain evade IF your opponent has a digimon with no sources. little protection and goes on theme. we can get jamming inheritables anyways. thoughts?
Protection is a good choice but i think hexe is probably sitting on board suspended most of the time since its likely stacking jamming, which means evade probably cant trigger. Some other wording or type of protect would be cool though!
I would add to the card pool my favourite of them all Dandevimon bt-4 (opponent turn)(once per turn) when your security stack is reduced trash the top card of you opponent security cards On deletion your opponent trash 2 cards from there hand I would errata the opponent turn effect to make it all turn effect and on deletion into when this digimon would leave the battle area and 3 evolution cost
A few things I would personaly change: Bt5 ChaosGallant Deletion should extend to Level 6's since the card costs 4 and you need to delete your own digimon-I do agree removing the On play restriction but it should be added as Red or Purple Lvl3 Dynasmon should let you trash 1 of your security to summon Lordknightmon since is his in lore partner in crime or a level 5 or lower digimon *Cof cof Lucemon or Lucemon Chaos mode* Megidramon should be treated as ChaosGallant while on the field that way you avoid looping on him time and time again. Guilmon was meant to combo with ChaosGallant so as an inheritable it could give Rush when you play a digimon with Guilmon in it's name EX4 ChaosGallant His first effect should be both Hand or Trash cause you require a harder time for the set up of getting it to the trash-and agreed his effect should be both When Digivolving and On play
Looking at most of these cards most of them are not that bad in their own right, they just lack a good deck to use them that they synergize with that also dont have better options. None of your erratas help the fact that the decks they go in are just bad overall and need more support, which is why most just get new versions when they see new support printed. Doragoramon is the only real exception and i agree that his deletion effect is a bit underwhelming. I would rather hit 1 big body than 2 smaller ones.
Fair point, but making a video where i suggest buffs that make the cards more playable is shorter than fixing the decks that they come in. Im working on a similar concept for a video where i make a line of support for a card and then showcase what cards i would put around it in a deck, but the format is a bit difficult to condense down and hold viewer retention with
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 84 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องศึก vs เมืองไทย"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3kuzsAIDf1c/mqdefault.jpg)
A big errata or alteration for me would be retroactively adding updated Typing to Digimon that got new/extra typing in later release (BT09 Magnamon X is not a Free type but BT16 is) or alternative Digivolution requirements over tribal archetypes to bypass colour restrictions, etc. Like all Agumons should be able to digivolve over any Koomon for example.
I would honestly be so down for a set that retroactively fixed all of those cards. Problem is that it would tank the value of existing cards. Would be an awesome errata tho
I would love for the old hexablaumon to gain evade IF your opponent has a digimon with no sources. little protection and goes on theme. we can get jamming inheritables anyways. thoughts?
Protection is a good choice but i think hexe is probably sitting on board suspended most of the time since its likely stacking jamming, which means evade probably cant trigger. Some other wording or type of protect would be cool though!
I would add to the card pool my favourite of them all Dandevimon bt-4 (opponent turn)(once per turn) when your security stack is reduced trash the top card of you opponent security cards On deletion your opponent trash 2 cards from there hand I would errata the opponent turn effect to make it all turn effect and on deletion into when this digimon would leave the battle area and 3 evolution cost
Or to add on deletion and on play
A few things I would personaly change:
Bt5 ChaosGallant Deletion should extend to Level 6's since the card costs 4 and you need to delete your own digimon-I do agree removing the On play restriction but it should be added as Red or Purple Lvl3
Dynasmon should let you trash 1 of your security to summon Lordknightmon since is his in lore partner in crime or a level 5 or lower digimon *Cof cof Lucemon or Lucemon Chaos mode*
Megidramon should be treated as ChaosGallant while on the field that way you avoid looping on him time and time again.
Guilmon was meant to combo with ChaosGallant so as an inheritable it could give Rush when you play a digimon with Guilmon in it's name
EX4 ChaosGallant His first effect should be both Hand or Trash cause you require a harder time for the set up of getting it to the trash-and agreed his effect should be both When Digivolving and On play
Are you making a bt17 chaosgallant deck?
Yup, goes up next wednesday
Looking at most of these cards most of them are not that bad in their own right, they just lack a good deck to use them that they synergize with that also dont have better options. None of your erratas help the fact that the decks they go in are just bad overall and need more support, which is why most just get new versions when they see new support printed. Doragoramon is the only real exception and i agree that his deletion effect is a bit underwhelming. I would rather hit 1 big body than 2 smaller ones.
Fair point, but making a video where i suggest buffs that make the cards more playable is shorter than fixing the decks that they come in. Im working on a similar concept for a video where i make a line of support for a card and then showcase what cards i would put around it in a deck, but the format is a bit difficult to condense down and hold viewer retention with