I think the honest advertising sounds a little out of place. It would seem to me (though I'm not an evolutionary biologist) that losing something that signals fitness could be a bad thing for the individual. Without a baculum, proto human males would be more likely to not get it up, and maybe less likely to reproduce. A second idea is that maybe safety in groups made the baculum unnecessary. From what I know, humans would not be a common prey item, unless the carnivore was desperate. Going into a human camp would be a very bad idea. Basically the idea is that, when humans did the deed they were a ton safer than your average field mouse and so the baculum became much less necessary. Thanks for the video on this weird topic.
Baculums* S is normally Z! One or more? You are telling one human lost their baculum? 5:30. S is important! Personally is stressed the first syllable, and English typically is on first syllables not second or thirds 6:31 typically english A is æ. S is more in the back rather the front in English!
So i know creatures can lost their bones... But can they grow bones?? I'm making snails and invertebrates reign as the top predators and evolve into similar body structure to our top predators... But then i just theorized that they grow soft bones into bones and lose their shells... And since snails only have a single foot, i just use their side to "grow" feets that is similar to other animals which, idk if that could ever happen or not, but the ones that i drew looks cooler at least
Growing bone(s) can indeed happen That being said, if we're talking about invertebrates, that is quite a leap of evolutionary process (if you are talking about true bones). The thing is, by the time they evolved true bones, they wouldn't even count as invertebrates anymore If you're going by the route of spiky keratin / chitinous structures then that would feel more natural.
@@OutofPlaceZoologist thank you! And i KNEW IT! I'm reaching for the stars with my logic! Trying to give invertebrates "bones" would be such a reach given they're called invertebrates... now i know i can't give them natural evolution So my stupid comic books idea of giving them "artificial" evolution by way of mutation makes better sense huh... I'm gonna give them a crazy scientist "DNA" and makes them mutate bit by bit into a humanoid creatures while some were given random animal's for earlier experiments... now no matter how stupidly unrealistic it is, you could just brush them off as "oh it's comic books! Why am i overthinking it?!" But later i would still try to make a speculative evolution someday! Again thank you for replying!
I wonder why did youtube recomend me this.But keep it up
All the points for you for arhem, havent the balls to talk about such a subject lol. But srly its genuinely interesting. Thanks for the video
I think the honest advertising sounds a little out of place. It would seem to me (though I'm not an evolutionary biologist) that losing something that signals fitness could be a bad thing for the individual. Without a baculum, proto human males would be more likely to not get it up, and maybe less likely to reproduce. A second idea is that maybe safety in groups made the baculum unnecessary. From what I know, humans would not be a common prey item, unless the carnivore was desperate. Going into a human camp would be a very bad idea. Basically the idea is that, when humans did the deed they were a ton safer than your average field mouse and so the baculum became much less necessary. Thanks for the video on this weird topic.
😂😂😂
Baculums* S is normally Z! One or more? You are telling one human lost their baculum? 5:30. S is important! Personally is stressed the first syllable, and English typically is on first syllables not second or thirds 6:31 typically english A is æ. S is more in the back rather the front in English!
I'm loving your channel. Great work, from SE USA
omd its a talking deer on the internet! i must subscribe!
So i know creatures can lost their bones... But can they grow bones??
I'm making snails and invertebrates reign as the top predators and evolve into similar body structure to our top predators... But then i just theorized that they grow soft bones into bones and lose their shells...
And since snails only have a single foot, i just use their side to "grow" feets that is similar to other animals which, idk if that could ever happen or not, but the ones that i drew looks cooler at least
Growing bone(s) can indeed happen
That being said, if we're talking about invertebrates, that is quite a leap of evolutionary process (if you are talking about true bones). The thing is, by the time they evolved true bones, they wouldn't even count as invertebrates anymore
If you're going by the route of spiky keratin / chitinous structures then that would feel more natural.
@@OutofPlaceZoologist thank you!
And i KNEW IT! I'm reaching for the stars with my logic! Trying to give invertebrates "bones" would be such a reach given they're called invertebrates... now i know i can't give them natural evolution
So my stupid comic books idea of giving them "artificial" evolution by way of mutation makes better sense huh...
I'm gonna give them a crazy scientist "DNA" and makes them mutate bit by bit into a humanoid creatures while some were given random animal's for earlier experiments... now no matter how stupidly unrealistic it is, you could just brush them off as "oh it's comic books! Why am i overthinking it?!"
But later i would still try to make a speculative evolution someday!
Again thank you for replying!