Parliamentary Questions - MP Sylvia Lim on deportation of convicted subjects

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @LonganLee
    @LonganLee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Weakest Link🤭🫣👀🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🙏

  • @LonganLee
    @LonganLee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    真金不怕红如火。光着屁股摊在阳光下。一清二楚。一目了然🫣🤭👀🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️🏳️language spoken in pure metaphorism

  • @LonganLee
    @LonganLee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now that the weakest link is identified....

  • @jer2911.L
    @jer2911.L 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Committee called Singh as a witness, and said later he had not been truthful during the hearings while under Oath. It recommended referring him and WP Vice-Chairman Faisal Manap to the Public Prosecutor for further investigations with a view to consider criminal preceedings which Parliament later endorsed.

  • @franciscody9622
    @franciscody9622 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a lawyer Sylvia Lim should know the deportee can go to any country that their passport allows them to enter. It is an deportation, not an extradition.

    • @johnnyquest6894
      @johnnyquest6894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think what Sylvia Lim was asking if they were given some kind of privilege to choose which country they want to deport to since they are holding multiple passports.

    • @franciscody9622
      @franciscody9622 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@johnnyquest6894 Poor choice of words by Sylvia Kim. If they were entitled to go to any country that their passport allows this is not a "privilege". It is a "right". Sylvia Kim should know better.

    • @johnnyquest6894
      @johnnyquest6894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@franciscody9622 no, it is not matter of choice of words. The deportation procedures are generally opaque even to seasoned lawyers.

    • @LonganLee
      @LonganLee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@johnnyquest6894ya lor. So clear and obvious but some maybe distracted by the small eyes

  • @anziar3038
    @anziar3038 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sylvia lim of WP has been found guilty of misusing $33M ahtc fund. She is still in WP. WP probably can't survive without her. She is so talented.😂😂

    • @johnnyquest6894
      @johnnyquest6894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@anziar3038 nonsensical nonsense! The court said she is liable for negligence which is a civil, not criminal matter. Guilty of what??? You are talking rubbish.

    • @jer2911.L
      @jer2911.L 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnnyquest6894 Ya, negligent with other people's money. It is as though Sylvia Lim tells the robber her house in unlocked and they can come in and steal all the money (which does not belong to her).