The ONLY 3 Lenses You Need For The Canon R50!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ม.ค. 2024
- Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/esse...
If I could only have 3 lenses for my Canon R50, I would pick these! This kit pretty much covers every focal length you need for great looking photos and videos all for around $1000 total.
Get the 10-18mm lens here 👇
geni.us/uzxr44B
Get the 50mm here 👇
geni.us/d1gi0
Get the 100-400mm here 👇
geni.us/HyQP
Learn more about the 10-18mm: • Canon RF-S 10-18mm vs ...
Learn more about the 50mm: • Canon RF 50mm f/1.8 | ...
Learn more about the 100-400mm: • Canon RF 100-400mm | T...
My other channel: / @foxtailwhipz
Get Great Deals On Used Camera Gear at KEH! www.shareasale.com/u.cfm?d=60...
Get TubeBuddy To Grow Your Channel: www.tubebuddy.com/FOXTAILWHIPZ
Instagram: @adamharig_
Video Edited By: Christopher Murray
Contact: chrisam6670@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gear I Recommend:
Cameras Under $100: • 5 Awesome Cameras Unde...
Cameras Under $500: • 5 Amazing Cameras For ...
Cinema Cameras Under $500: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Cinema Cameras Under $1000: • Best Budget Cinema Cam...
Favorite Budget Camera: amzn.to/41axLCp
Favorite Budget Lens: amzn.to/3XJcaOG
Great Lens Adapter: amzn.to/3IiBepY
Great Wireless Mic: amzn.to/3KlnJbC
Do-It-All Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
My Gear:
Cameras
My TH-cam Camera: amzn.to/3Dkd0Ln
Budget TH-cam Camera: amzn.to/3RNHkBK
My Photo Camera: amzn.to/3B7pKSx
Lenses
My A Roll Lens: amzn.to/3Dffnz1
Wide Angle Lens: amzn.to/3U1GByK
Portrait Lens: amzn.to/3RRTdXt
Other Gear
Tripod: amzn.to/3ElcFaX
Travel Tripod: amzn.to/3xHI6YZ
Mini Tripod: amzn.to/3SaEAin
Microphone: amzn.to/3qy7gWo
Editing Computer: shorturl.at/CP028
Headphones: amzn.to/3B5Kvyf
Mouse: amzn.to/3RPp1fC
Gimbal: amzn.to/3L5wsgp
Main Studio Light: amzn.to/3xdfB5M
Accent Lights: amzn.to/3xfqNPf
AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: Some of the links used in the description are affiliate links, so if you purchase through them I may be compensated.
------------------------------------------------------------------
#r50 #best #lenses - บันเทิง
Grab my new ESSENTIALS Lightroom Preset Pack! 📷 foxtailshop.com/products/essentials-preset-pack
Hey bro, I've left a couple comments, hopefully you see them, I need help with getting a affordable and quality lens for talking head content on YT, basically I want a wide view, like the class TH-camr look with a blurry background, with me in focus, I'm a super noob, any direction on a decent lens for this would be great please, I plan to buy 1 necessary lens tomorrow
The 10-18mm is an RF-S lens. Which means. It's an APS-C lens. It will give a 1.6x cropped image on full sensors.
Thanks for continuing to make canon camera content!! It’s hard to find nowadays!
Thank you for this detailed, yet brief overview!
Thanks for showing the R50 some love. Would love to see what a more extreme kitted out rig would look like
Thank you! Keep making content on r50 please 😩👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👊🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Great survey. Many thanks!
Pretty nice set but I’d add a small super zoom to the list for travel and walk around general purpose photography, the 18-150mm RF-S kit lens is quite good for a kit lens.
It also really depends on how you shoot. Large apertures are a must if you dont shoot on a mount or at anything outside good bright lighting.
The R50 is well noted to absolutely shit the bed at moderate to low light.
I run RF16, RF28 and RF100-400. If I'm sure I don't need tele, I swap 100-400 with adapting EF Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 contemporary. When the Sigma 18-50 RF version arrives, I'll trade that out.
The 100-400 only make sense for wild life photography, I can’t see it being use much for any other genre. It also doesn’t make sense on the R50, apsc for wild life probably would be better with R7, the higher quality apsc in canon system. The focusing is too slow on R50, I have one I would know.
Being from Michigan, loved seeing pic from mackinaw City in Mackinac Island.
I bought Sigma 18-35 1.8 and so far this is my main (and the only) lens to go with R50. I think it makes sense to also have 1st and 3rd, thanks.
Is it heavy?
Good review
Thanks!
I'd replace the 50mm with the 35mm F1.8 macro IS STM. It does depend on the use case of course but for most portraits etc, the 50mm 1.8 is just too close up if you want to shoot full body. I tried both and ended up returning the 50mm.
The 35mm is sharper than the 50, has Image stabilization and can actually do some macro work if you ever want to experiment with that.
The rest of the video I agree with fully. I have this setup along with the RF 35mm F1.8, RF-s 18-45 kit lens and RF-s 55-210 lens.
Agreed on the 50mm. It's a nice budget lens and I got one to go along with my new R50 body. I hadn't taken into account the 1.6 and it ended up being a bit much for me taking pics of the wife and kids indoors -- I had to stand in the next room to fit them in the frame.
It's going back and I have the 28mm one coming today. I'm hoping that one's a little better for indoors and just general purpose. I could always try the 35mm also.
I'm also considering the 10-18mm recommended here. I reckon I could match that up with an 18-45mm kit lens (Like New ones are cheap on MPB) and they should do everything I'd need casually.
@@gregp74how’s the 28 mm?
The 24mm f1.8 is pretty good as well.
@@Spike_147 I only tried the 28mm briefly. It seemed to work well. Before the return period on my R50 was up I took it back and got a full frame R8. My lens needs with that were a bit different so I returned the 28mm as well.
With the new camera I've been mostly sticking with the 50mm f1.8 and the 35mm f1.8 IS. Those two seem do a good job and I've got the 24-105 f4-7.1 (not as good but it's convenient at times.)
@@gregp74 Thank you! Planning to buy 35mm
Out of all which one would you prefer for shooting indoor videos?
very heplful
Adam - Thanks for all your videos they are super helpful. I am looking for a macro lens for my cannon ae-1 program and wondering if you had a few suggestions? My subjects would be insects, flowers, shells. I want to get super close to the objects picking up detail. Thanks in advance.
Thanks so much! I would recommend the Canon FD 50mm f3.5 macro, as well as the FD 70-210mm for getting great macro shots with the AE1. I’ve used them both on digital for macro photos and they’re great!
@@adamharig if you had to choose between the two, which would win?
@adamharig What is the lens that you can most recommend for product photography
and does these lenses are good for video?
ok in Australian dollars including tax in the price its $599 for the ultra wide, $325 for the f1.8 prime lens and $1179 for the 100mm-400mm your looking at 2103 AUD which is $1373 USD in the grand space of things I guess its not bad but these lens my question is are they high quality?
Question what is that thing around the camera to make it easier to hold?
It’s a Smallrig Cage :)
Please how switch between manual focus and auto focus I fix the focus? I've just bought the R50 camera and 50mm lens but the button on the lens does not affect the focus. I know I'm supposed to do it from the camera but I don't know how.
Please help.
Go into your menu. Select AF page 1. Under AF operation select Servo. Toggle down and there will be several options for AF I usually use 1 point AF.Turn on whole area tracking servo AF. Under subject to detect pick what you are shooting, people, animals, vehicle.Next enable eye detection. Finally under focus mode select AF and you should be good.
I just bought R50.. And I'm loving it ❤
How was it? Just bought mine. I am coming from an m50 mkii dunno if it was a smart decision 😅
@@gray4043 Try R50
So I'm stuck in between buying the EFS 10-18 or the RF for my M50. I already have an adapter (Viltrox speed booster), considering I can drop the aperture in the EFs one, what will you advise me to do?
EFS lenses don't fit with the Viltrox speed booster (back of the lens protrudes on the EFS lenses) and RF mount lenses are incompatible with the M50. You can use a standard EF to M Mount adapter without the speed booster lens element for the EFS 10-18. I'm loving the 10-18mm on my R50
@@cre8r61 thank you 😊
Does the 10-18mm lens convert your r50 into full frame? Or would you need something else for that
You need a different camera.
Does anyone know how to make the background blurry I have r50 and 1 lens which is 18-45 mm
You need a fast lens, kit lens at f/4.5 just won’t do it.
The 35/1.8, which shot at f/1.8 or f/2 will blur backgrounds nicely, as will the 50mm f/1.8.
Which camera lens would you recommend for better video stabilization?
The R50 has I believe 4 stops on stabilization in video mode. If you purchase an L IS USM lens like the 15-35 f2.8 you will get up to another 5 stops. Hope this helps.
@@stephenourada3217it costs more than my car
What is the best lens if i want to do youtube videos with R50 please, a lens that isolate the background and still sharp and get good frame without pushing the camera 6 feet away like the 50mm 1.8
A good option would be the RF-24 is f1.8 or a cheaper alternative the RF-28 f2.8
18-45 is good and more enough
when you zoom the camera with 100-400mm does it losses quality when you zoom?
No, it’s not a digital zoom like a phones zoom
The only 3 lens are 10-18mm 16mm and 50mm
So, you just don't shoot telephoto then?
10-18 and 24-105 if you have the budget with a 50mm
For full frame : 28mm , 50mm
For apsc : 16mm , 35mm
@@MegaCasperC 18-150 its a pretty good lens for all around use...i wouldnt reccomend the 10-18 due to the fact that it has dark aperture
I thought the third one is 24-105mm.
Hi, I’m new to photography and I have the canon R50 and would love to take real estate photos, what lens would you recommend?
For real estate I would purchase the 16mm f/2.8 or the 10-18mm that Adam recommends. The R50 has a 1.6 crop factor so the 16mm equals 25.6mm. You need a wide lens to capture the majority of the images used in real estate.
@@stephenourada3217 thank you for that information.
If you're comfortable with manual lenses have a look at the TTArtisan ƒ2 10mm or adapting the EFS 10-18mm ƒ4.5-5.6 are great options for wide angle lenses
A better question is what camera you use to make this video ?
I used a Sony A7S iii to record it :)
@@adamharig which camera you think is better for recording videos the A7 iii or the R50?
Although I am not buying them very soon but here in India its more than 1300 USD. But surely buy those one day :)
I am a beginner. What is a good zoom for a Canon R50.?I was thinking of the Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM but I understand it is really dark at 7.1 and not really good for low light
Who is better 10mm vs 50 mm
50mm is better in my opinion
Depends on what you are shooting. With the 1.6 crop the 10mm equals a 16mm good for wide angle. The 50mm equals a 80mm better for medium distance. Having an f1.8 on the 50 is nice.
Bro r50 kid lans video rivew
So would these 3 replace the previous list of 4? th-cam.com/video/uRGfC_vNQ1U/w-d-xo.html
I can only agree with 50mm. partially.
But overall this is a very convenient and obvious set. Looks almost like an advertisement.
You definitely show budget lenses. So we are addressing this to people who save money, right?
So the first thing is an adapter. And the second thing is used market. Let's use imagination, as well as knowledge from many tests:
1) RF 10-18 is not exactly the thing that squeezes all the juice out of the sensor. At 10mm it crops out about 20% of the frame to even out its 10% distortion. I am really a big opponent of this “smartphone” approach. Imagine that a person has all this hidden magic in his smartphone and he's tired of it, he really wants to have control now. And what does he get with this lens? Stretched pixels, unused sensor potential in the name of compactness.
EF 10-18 is not the most reliable lens, but a good copy will give a more honest result and you will still be able to use all the 22x14mm area of sensor you paid for when you bought the camera. This lens may not be so sharp wide open, but all this stuff with stretching doesn’t give any chance to corners in a new lens, closing the aperture is useless. And besides, you will see additional consequences during processing.
2) The RF 50 is an excellent lens with a wonderful bonus in the form of a minimum focusing distance, but... If there is an adapter, you can also consider the EF version. It will be cheaper. You just need to remember that RF cameras do not support linear manual focus on EF STM lenses.
3) I don't like 100-400 at all. This is 70-300, which was made longer and darker. This is what Canon is doing with its telephoto lenses now. And specifically with this lens, especially on crop, I don’t like it. This is not a very sharp lens and some tests show that the EF 70-300 usm IS II at this pixel density can be sharper even after a crop to 400mm field of view. Even if this is not the case, and the 100-400 has some advantage in detail when shooting distant objects, it will not be very significant. But the 70-300 is a more versatile lens, and at the same time it at least "almost" contains the 100-400 in itself. And you can't say the opposite. And yes, you can find 70-300 cheaper.
I don't know. Maybe there are some happy people who just go to stores and buy what the sellers offer them. Do they need guides? In any case, I have not seen such people in my area. Most photographers I know make the most of their budget and yes, EF was and remains a savior. Without EF, it will not yet be possible to spend money wisely.
In addition, I consider it necessary to criticize the choice of focal lengths itself.
1) An ultra-wide-angle zoom can hardly be called a must-have lens. I constantly see beginners selling such lenses. It's a cool toy, but in a practical sense it's a much more niche tool than many suspect. What I consider a more practical lens... is a regular boring kit zoom. And again EF comes to the rescue. Because what is being offered now with mirrorless cameras is the same underdesigned nonsense as 10-18. Usual EF-s18-55 of the latest generations are pretty good. And they're dirt cheap.
2) It's hard to argue against 50, but I can suggest 35 as an alternative. There is a hidden gem on the EF-s mount and it is a 35 2.8 macro IS stm. Yes, it is darker, but it is sharp wide open, has a more versatile focal length as an “everyday prime” and has stabilization. Really cool underrated stuff. Don't forget about ef/ef-s pancakes too. Yes, yes aperture. But again, 50mm on a crop may turn out to be a less convinient focal length outside of portrait photography.
3) Does people really need tele-zoom lens right away ? I'm not sure. Really. This is a cool toy, but at the same time a very specific tool. And the longer, the more specific. And even if you want a telephoto lens, there are safer and more versatile solutions, such as 70-200 4. The first version with a stabilizer can be found at a good price. It's sharp as a razor. And you won't lose money if you sell it right away.
Why do y'all TH-camrs keep pushing that shallow dof is somehow a professional look?
Maybe cause it is? Got nothing to do with TH-camrs it’s just how cinematic footage is made in general
@@andrejcupac7359 Nope. Shallow dof is used roughly 10% to 20% of the time.
@@dct124 obviously, but that’s literally irrelevant to the point. Are you saying a shallow DOF isn’t professional looking? No ones saying having a flatter look isn’t professional just that more depth looks nice…
@@andrejcupac7359 It's not. If it were, entire movies or rather 80%-90% of a films would be shot using shallow depth of field, yet it's the reverse. That's like trying to say a Wes Anderson film isn't cinematic.
Just some cinematic masterpieces in recent history.
The Hateful 8, The Revenant, 1917, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, Inception, Interstellar, Oppenheimer, Dune, Everything All At Once, Poor Things
Are the scenes with Shallow Depth of Field more cinematic than those without? No, and vice versa.
What makes an image or scene more or less cinematic is the LIGHTING. Lighting has the largest impact.
Location, composition, framing are secondary. Color, contrast, sharpness, movement next.
Your camera, lens, and equipment are the least important in making something look cinematic. That's why you can grab an old camera, a f5.6, f8 lens and make something look cinematic. You can't throw a fast lens at a problem and think it's going to magically turn garbage into anything resembling something cinematic.
If you speak to any good DP, they'll tell you its lighting. People say Shallow DOF b/c it's a bad habit and my point is that TH-camrs i.e. influencers perpetuate the false narrative.
I'm done on the topic, it's a waste of time. You're not going to shallow dof your way into cinematic shots.
@@dct124 thanks for the info, yeah you're right actually. not to mention how much money you'd have to spend to get f1.8 or f2.4 on any lense. i guess the youtubers also fooled me
wow those lens are expensive for the quality they are.... I remember when you could get a 50mm prime lens from canon for less than 50 bucks.
these shitty dark zooms are so useless. you need perfect sun to shoot at f8 especially on crop sensor what a joke
You gotta remember who this video is for. R50 users are either new to photography or doing it on a budget. The best way to make a budget lens is to darken the aperture. (especially on zooms) tbf tho, the 50mm and the 100-400mm are super sharp for their price. The 100-400mm is almost perfect except for the aperture
4.5 = garbage
Not necessarily, you just need a lot of light to make it work decently well. I've shot great photo's with a 55-210 f5-7.1, under the right conditions. All a matter of perspective. This channel is mostly targeted to the beginner hobbyist, so for the budget this list (maybe apart from the 50mm, since you can get the 35 for not that much more and that is a way better lens imo) is great.
@@Kevinskanaal the 35mm is $300 more. That’s way he’s recommending the 50mm
@@justinburley8659 I’d rather spend 300 more (which it isn’t, more like 200/250) for a lens with all the benefits listed, mostly being usable for portraits in non deserted and wide open areas.
@@Kevinskanaalsuch as?
Image stabilisation, sharper, easier to use for portraits in busy areas. Macro capabilities as well.