Class was great again. Thanks for helping me understand the differences between the two. As I posted in a previous video, I have the USB 4 and NA 28. You said there may be differences in the recent editions. Here are my observations as I followed you in my editions. The UBS 4 doesn't cite Valentinius and has notes for verse 19. In the NA 28 "the unique/only begotten son" reference is not abbreviated. Thanks for the content.
@@alexandersmith9385 Interesting, honestly I love talking about this stuff so much! Great minds think alike. It would be an interesting study to thoroughly go thru both apparatuses and compare their differences. I wonder if someone has already done this? 🤔 I'm sure there's something out there.
Class was great again. Thanks for helping me understand the differences between the two. As I posted in a previous video, I have the USB 4 and NA 28. You said there may be differences in the recent editions. Here are my observations as I followed you in my editions. The UBS 4 doesn't cite Valentinius and has notes for verse 19. In the NA 28 "the unique/only begotten son" reference is not abbreviated. Thanks for the content.
@@alexandersmith9385 Interesting, honestly I love talking about this stuff so much! Great minds think alike. It would be an interesting study to thoroughly go thru both apparatuses and compare their differences. I wonder if someone has already done this? 🤔 I'm sure there's something out there.
Nope. Good video. Thanks!
I have two copies of UNS. One of the Nestle Aland. I preferred the UBS as the print is MUCH bigger. 🥸
@@20Hikecdt23 I agree! It's much easier to read.