When you compare call of duty to battlefield it's stupid to add in dynamic environment since cod hasn't done it, and if they have it's so minor it didn't even matter. So this video kinda feels like what one game has and let's see if the other has it totally disregarding the other games unique features.
Fun Fact: The US snipers in BF1 do actually keep both eyes open when aiming, since it was part of the US Army sniper training to be able to aim while having a full FOV around you. Edit: Another benefit is that it limits the strain on the snipers aiming eye, which is quite important if your job is *to see bad guys*
Imagine comparing a latest game with details to a game thats been out for more than 4 yrs but still has better details than COD itselfs lol...battlefield 1 was way ahead amd was made with passion with bf 3 and 4
Imagine comparing and arcade shooter to a sandbox shooter, funny right, but people play COD more than BF and makes more money every year, BF1 is a pretty game, but Doesn't compare to any cod when it comes to gameplay 😹
@@jonathanalvarez3368 disculpa el español, bueno eso es lo que hace battlefield por ejemplo el 5 tiene mejor jugabilidad que este peeo sin perder identidad, y en mi opinion es mejor que el 2042 que no lo hayas jugado es tu problema xd
This is the moment in gaming history that the crew that created BF1 need to come together again and make a new game. It would be right on time and is much needed
My final assesment is that while Vanguard does have a few details that are actually kinda nice (peeking, shells bouncing off the walls, a few others here and there), BF1 easily knocks Vanguard out of the room, and it's not even close. And I'm being very generous by giving Vanguard those few points
A lot of the missing details are just gameplay choices though. No one wants to be heard from footsteps on random objects lol mw got criticized for the loud footsteps.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 Then lower the footsteps sounds? It's really not that hard, there's no excuse to not include differing footstep noises for different objects when all you have to do is lower the footstep audio to a reasonable amount.
The attention to detail in bf1 is absolutely insane sometimes. Such a phenomenal game. I also heard that they had the voices for the soldiers in game lift heavy objects before doing their voices to simulate fatigue.
I grew up with CoD but damn, they couldn't even come close to a game that is already 5 years old. Also I remember doing the stealth missions in MW2 on split screen. We were crawling through the snow to evade the Russian soldiers and be really tactical. After killing a lonely enemy you could hear metallic noises of the empty shells getting ejected from our guns. While doing a tactical reload our characters yelled **I'M EMPTY; RELOADING!** or some shit like that, it was so stupid hahahha
but who fucking care about if a game is 6 years old or no? details never get old, only pixels and raw power is what get old, details, animations and research? never got old even when the first xbox came out.
@Atoms and shocked animation when you get close suddenly in mw3, holding throat is already there in call of duty 4 or world at war if i remember correctly
10:22 fun fact! that detail actually makes vanguard less accurate. In both world wars, soldiers weren't trained to save ammo like that such a thing, if I'm not mistaken, was only developed in the 80s
@@filipealarza9079 don't forget that optical sights in WWII were still fairly new and was mainly used in aircraft. Furthermore, if I remember correctly, optical sights were required to run a big battery, almost like a car battery
3:15 Sound of the shell dropping changes depends on the environment. For example when you're standing at concrete floor, it will make the sound of shell bouncing off the concrete floor, and in water it'll make a plop sound so it's kinda false.
He’s talking about the shells hitting the wall, the shell doesn’t even hit the wall in the Battlefield demonstration but whatever it’s such a small detail nobody would even notice it
@@Yeahimman32 why are you talking about bf5? You didn’t say you were and in this video bf5 is not even mentioned. We were left to assume you were talking about what was in the time stamps you put.
Bf1 has British Empire, French Republic, German Empire, Tsarist Russia, USSR, Ottoman Empire, Austro Hungary, Italian Kingdom and USA as playable factions and they all have complete sets of uniforms, voice lines and intros. Cod Vanguard had my team and enemy team and don't even let you play as Axis side. I think it is more than clear who wins
Also don’t forget the British had different uniforms in the turning tides dlc. On achi baba and cape helles they were wearing the gallipoli campaign uniforms with the shorts. Then on the naval maps they gave them the blue Royal Marines uniform. Probably something a majority of people wouldn’t notice or care about but it was nice none the less.
To be fair it is realistic for soldiers to dump ammo in ww1, and sometimes in ww2. In cod you play as modern day airsoft players roleplaying Wolfenstine
@@ikstarven It sounds sarcastic so I'll say this If enemies are in your trench and you don't want to risk running out of ammo before killing them, you want the fastest reload possible (not saving the mags). That's my opinion though, and I'm only a teen so my only experience is nothing.
@@person12321Plus in WW1 most weapons either had internal magazines that you could top off with single rounds or clips, or had small magazines where losing a few rounds would be negligible, not including single shot and belt fed/all kinds of weird and wonderful WW1-era weapons
5:27 I understand the sin but another sin that should’ve been for vanguard is the fact that you tactically reload every single weapon in the game as if you’re some special forces member in 2020
Three details: 1: You can even hear raindrops falling on the shells if you listen closely 2: You can throw grenades back in bf1 3: And for reloading, look at the m1912 repetierpistole, he saves the bullets left Also take a look at the peacekeeper, there are different animations for every reload, Also when you have only one bullet left in a bolt action, it will in some rifles take out the one bullet so he can reload with a stripper clip, whereas he would reload with single bullets if there is more than one bullet
The last Battlefield game that was made with passion & how DICE core members tried their best to win EA's trust on BF1 since using WW1 as the main setting was never implemented much in many shooter games before judging on how limited potential & fun factor it can be.. but long story short, they successfully created this masterpiece.
The battlefield series is like a constant fight between EA and dice over control of its development, if EA wins you get a shitty game that no one likes filled with micro transactions(early BF5 and BF2042) but if DICE wins they get pour their heart and souls into making the best game they can
You can also "trip" on those shells in BF1. If you go prone, and try getting up shortly after. You'll hear a *clang* *clang*, and you'll be forced back into prone. If you mash buttons like I do, hitting the jump button you'll recover almost seemlessly. But this is true, with the action I described anywhere, it's more noticable when you are being supressed or actively taking damage.
It's impressive how many details I never consciously noticed; but also that every one goes into making the whole experience as high quality as it is in bf1. Even when you don't notice something is there, you know when it's missing.
Just because you see people keep their rifle “shouldered” while reloading doesn’t mean they’re aiming. Aiming and reloading instead of getting cover/concealment is an insanely ludicrous thing to do. As an earlier comment pointed out, BF1 is an older game no doubt, it still somehow pummels vanguard in the ground
DICE stated it actually was. Apparently before BF1 they were very interested in doing a WW1 game but EA didn't think it would sell well. So DICE had to fight EA to allow it
3:20 COD shells were hitting two different types of material. BF1 they were hitting the wall and floor made from the same ceramic tile. Point remans though there are some differences, good and bad from both sides.
5:33 the reload cycle of the battlefield series of games is more accurate to real life because you want to be able to see how you're loading your gun, if you reload the gun like how it is shown in Vanguard you may accidentally put the magazine in wrong, either upside down or backwards
As a completely biased Battlefield fan, especially that BF1 is my favorite one, i still have to admit that we should not compare CoD and Battlefield too much. Models, sounds, effects of explosion are fine but we have to remember that CoD is more arcade game And for much smaller maps the destruction seen in Battlefield could be too much. CoD always was a smaller scale game. explosion crater in middle of a map could change a lot in CoD but in BF it's almost no difference in such huge maps
The destruction has much more of an impact than you say it does in BF1. It can COMPLETELY change how the game is played. Like on Sinai Desert, the very beginning is absolute hell to cross. As the match goes on, more craters are made, and you can use those as cover. St Quentin scar can change quickly too. The town is nearly leveled pretty quick, and it brings more open sightlines. Though, on some maps like Ballroom Blitz, minus destroying the roofing and camping up there have little change. Mainly the ones with one massive structure. Minus Empire's Edge and Fao Fortress, because those forts can be destroyed by the Dreadnought's cannons
@@wildwyatxbox "...the destruction seen in Battlefield could be too much." i know :3 sometimes i do a hole with my assault to later go there as a recon or support destruction in BF1 and V gives the player a lot of freedom and strategic opportunities i just wanted to say that for battlefield it works but in Co on small maps it would mes up the map, CoD is more arcade and maps should be well crafted and always without change
Most of them already left the studio so that's not possible and also EA wants battlefield to be like fortnite so it can attract little kids and make tons in microtransactions so a war focused battlefield will never happen again instead you'll get soldier flossing and dancing emotes
2:06 in bf1, shells come immediately with a powder charge, which is why they explode, and in the vanguard are simple blanks without a powder charge. Even if these are land mines, the bullet will not penetrate a thick layer of metal and will not detonate the projectile. So I didn't notice any mistakes here. Or maybe the developer is lazy just)
I was playing BFV the other day when a FlakPanzer was shooting at a friendly tank at an angle. I had never realized this, but half of the rounds would bounce off the tank, but the impressive part is that they would then explode mid air after bouncing off of the tank, that's some crazy cool ballistics and certainly looked sick. I'll never not be impressed by Battlefield games (2042 exempt)
@@sanjithd3343 in my personal opinion I think gameplay matters the most because even if the game does not look that good it can still be very fun (minecraft is a good example of this) But I still feel like details are important but not more important than gameplay. But can still be amazing. Including shooters
Ive always found CoD games to be very static and lifeless when it comes to the maps. Weak physics/no physics at all, no destruction, poor effects and details etc... This video proves my point once again.
I remember when the ww2 veterans would come to the school and tell us about when they stormed the beaches of Normandy with m1 garands with a drum mag, yellow ring sight, and M1928 compensator
It’s honestly sad to see a game from 2022 be wrecked by a game from 2016. I still play BF1 to this day and it’s still fun. Vanguard is already dead while BF1 is still goin strong.
5:37 is not true for all guns in BF1, for example use the Ross Mk III infantry and you can ADS and reload at the same time. So this fact is not true at all
I have to say that this video is good but in 3:14 you took a c96 version which ejects the spent cardriges upwards. This is therefore not ideal for your point.
3:16 In Battlefield 1, the sound of bullet casings falling to the ground varies depending on the terrain. But There is no sound hitting the wall. 8:59 I can't remember what the Vanguard campaign was like. But in World War 2 campaign If you hit the head There were details in which the character's hat or helmet was blown off. Details and systems such as the reloading motion of Vanguard's guns are not suitable for World War II. It's from Warzone's system. For example, the act of loading two magazines in one hand or holding a pistol with both hands (it is correct to hold a pistol with one hand in WWI or WWII) is close to modern warfare rather than WWII. Details and systems such as the reloading motion of Vanguard's guns are not suitable for World War II. It's from Warzone's system.
If a grenade lands at my feet and I have nowhere to hide I'm sure as hell gonna try throwing it back. If the fuze is so short I can't, it means it's too short for me to take cover too.
10:21 You could've said BF1 mostly has guns that don't save ammo but some guns do like the LMG's that Cycle Ammo back onto the open drum and even the MLE pistol has them save the Ammo.
@@stitchd1698 Its not really that broken. I had allot of fun with it. Although its subjective. Spawning can be annoying but thankfully you choose where to spawn.
There are many FPS games that I played, but BF1 is the game that I played the most, EVER. I still play it almost everyday. COD, on the other hand, for me, the last one that I really liked was Modern Warfare. The other CODs that I like are COD2 and WaW. But none are like BF1.
For me it's the battle crys. They give me goosebumps sometimes. (Most likely because I'm new player only 5 days since it was on sale $8. Best $8 I've ever spent in years!!!
I like that battlefield 1 manages to keep this level of detail while still being fun to play, it manages to stay somewhat accurate even though it's not sandstorm or post scriptum.
Debo decir que gracias a que la vegetación con movimiento dinámico en el mapa con el cuerpo de los jugadores muchas veces me a dado ideas de donde se encuentra escondido el campero, realmente muchos de los detalles son increíbles y siempre es de agradecer que los programadores consideran agregarlos al juego final por que le da calidad de vida al juego
one big thing that bf1 has (not entirely sure on vanguard or maybe it is not even applicable as a comparison if the equivalent docent exist in vanguard: in bf1 clip size matters, if you reload a bolt action rifle that has say 5 bullets shot, the soldier will use a speed loader to load 5 bullets immediately if only like 3 bullets are used, the soldier will open the bolt, and load three individual shells in instead.
There’s a problem with the sight you have on the weapon in vanguard. Those sights did exist but only for aircraft because there’s a light in there reflecting off of some glass, and the guns in Ww2 were assigned to you and you needed to give them back after your use of it.
That detail on the wall boucing shells on Vanguard is pretty cool but insufficient to beat those BF1 and BFV (yes BFV is insane in terms of details, wee bit less for immersion unfortunately...)
3:11 Hold on a second. In BF1, if you shot over a wood floor, the dropping sound it's tottaly different from the regular one. You're not seeing all the ditails mate
In BF1 you take less damage from explosives the closer you are to the ground. Also there’s a form of stop, drop, and roll in BF1 if you just lay down while on fire to stop the burning effect.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 at least 2042 is something new and interesting and fun and seeing your comments on other vids your clearly just blind hating the game, 2042 may suck for sure but it isn’t a bland dlc for a previous game
I see no one talking about Easter eggs so I will. Battlefield 1 had some cool ass Easter eggs!! There were unique weapons and skins to unlock, as well as dog tags! God the amount of detail given to them was incredible. I can’t even remember a single mw2019 or Cold War Easter egg. Or vanguard
The ammo thing is realistic for the time. COD Vanguard has soldiers reloading like they're super tactical special forces when, in reality, they were just kids with very little training.
Ok idk why people think aiming with one eye closed is a good small detail… it’s a wrong detail. Marksman always shoot with both eyes open because closing one eye really limits your field of vision and eliminates half of your peripheral vision. And when you’re in an active Warzone you don’t want to be shooting half blind.
@@Dimi.._._ easier to aim… but otherwise ineffective by comparison. Limiting your vision in a Warzone is the least pragmatic decision to make my guy. And soldier don’t do that anyway.
@@Omega14343 but in a game where the characters you play as are supposedly in the military… both eyes being open make much more sense. Starting to pick up what I’m putting down lad?
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 vs Battlefield 5 - Attention to Detail Comparison
th-cam.com/video/3dEUImpzkR4/w-d-xo.html
Either way bf1 is better
I need to get BF1 as soon as I can! Vanguard doesn't have sh*t on BF1.
Its like comparing cyberpunk2077 with gta5
When you compare call of duty to battlefield it's stupid to add in dynamic environment since cod hasn't done it, and if they have it's so minor it didn't even matter. So this video kinda feels like what one game has and let's see if the other has it totally disregarding the other games unique features.
@@christophersmith5947 except fucking awesome gun play.
Fun Fact: The US snipers in BF1 do actually keep both eyes open when aiming, since it was part of the US Army sniper training to be able to aim while having a full FOV around you.
Edit: Another benefit is that it limits the strain on the snipers aiming eye, which is quite important if your job is *to see bad guys*
really, wouldn't that limit their effectiveness. it would make more sense to have a 2 man sniper squad like we have today
@@pivotboy2062 How would that limit effectiveness? It literally allows them to see more around them
@@pivotboy2062 he spoke about fov not squading.
And you keep both eyes open til this day
Details
I challenge that you will never see this much detailed game ever
Imagine comparing a latest game with details to a game thats been out for more than 4 yrs but still has better details than COD itselfs lol...battlefield 1 was way ahead amd was made with passion with bf 3 and 4
That old dice devs knows whats makes a true battlefield. But this new devs are confusing battlefield with cod and apex legends.
COD is a fat money grab now reminds me of all the cheap Droid games that assault you with ads these days
Battlefield was launched in 2016 ;)
Imagine comparing and arcade shooter to a sandbox shooter, funny right, but people play COD more than BF and makes more money every year, BF1 is a pretty game, but Doesn't compare to any cod when it comes to gameplay 😹
@@jonathanalvarez3368 disculpa el español, bueno eso es lo que hace battlefield por ejemplo el 5 tiene mejor jugabilidad que este peeo sin perder identidad, y en mi opinion es mejor que el 2042 que no lo hayas jugado es tu problema xd
This is the moment in gaming history that the crew that created BF1 need to come together again and make a new game. It would be right on time and is much needed
Let's look forward to embark studio's ARC raiders
Ah buddy listen now: many great developers from DICE have already left the studio after BFV launch and then, the 2042 debacle.
A battlefield game in the cold war would be nice I think
As much I do not want to say this bf1 had so many bullshits going on in the game which was pissed off a lot of ppl
@R 2042 is sorta reviving itself...sorta
My final assesment is that while Vanguard does have a few details that are actually kinda nice (peeking, shells bouncing off the walls, a few others here and there), BF1 easily knocks Vanguard out of the room, and it's not even close. And I'm being very generous by giving Vanguard those few points
A lot of the missing details are just gameplay choices though. No one wants to be heard from footsteps on random objects lol mw got criticized for the loud footsteps.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 Then lower the footsteps sounds? It's really not that hard, there's no excuse to not include differing footstep noises for different objects when all you have to do is lower the footstep audio to a reasonable amount.
@@venommagnus trust me cod would be worse if it tried to be realistic.
@@kevinsteelflex7371 ??? vanguard tried being unrealistic and its literally worse than ghosts
@@kevinsteelflex7371 yeah but bf1 is still beter with details tho
The attention to detail in bf1 is absolutely insane sometimes. Such a phenomenal game.
I also heard that they had the voices for the soldiers in game lift heavy objects before doing their voices to simulate fatigue.
Kinda like battlefield v more but I respect your opinion.
@@Iamnotaspy. bf v is soooo trash
@@droopy_plays5188 Revive simulator.
Yeah. I'm not sure about anyone else, but the German VAs had to lift weights and do workouts before and during their lines.
@@droopy_plays5188 better than vanguard at least, though it's not a high bar
2016 vs 2021 and battlefield 1 still miles ahead
let that sink in
Its crazy and sad in the same time we should go forwarn not the oppisite way with games
I shoot i forgot thanks for reminding me 🚿🚪
Moder warfare details were waaya better
@@ricksmorty4545 😂😂😂
@@Htchhgjhhchc45 I can't type for shit
I grew up with CoD but damn, they couldn't even come close to a game that is already 5 years old.
Also I remember doing the stealth missions in MW2 on split screen. We were crawling through the snow to evade the Russian soldiers and be really tactical. After killing a lonely enemy you could hear metallic noises of the empty shells getting ejected from our guns. While doing a tactical reload our characters yelled **I'M EMPTY; RELOADING!** or some shit like that, it was so stupid hahahha
Its almost 6 actually
"I hate German shepherd"
but who fucking care about if a game is 6 years old or no? details never get old, only pixels and raw power is what get old, details, animations and research? never got old even when the first xbox came out.
Ikr same
They did it's MW2019
In BF1 if you shoot the enemy's neck or throat there's an animation holding their neck
i do remember actually seeing that
I think black ops 2 had this animation aswell
@Atoms and shocked animation when you get close suddenly in mw3, holding throat is already there in call of duty 4 or world at war if i remember correctly
@Atoms wait. I think it's modern warfare 2 that invented shocked enemy animation first.
@@agamer5944 Cod mw2 has soldier touching there body .
10:22 fun fact! that detail actually makes vanguard less accurate. In both world wars, soldiers weren't trained to save ammo like that
such a thing, if I'm not mistaken, was only developed in the 80s
Neat.
To make it even worse, optical sights were not around in WW2.
@@filipealarza9079 I've seen some on hmg but not on other guns except snipers and m1 grand
@@filipealarza9079 don't forget that optical sights in WWII were still fairly new and was mainly used in aircraft.
Furthermore, if I remember correctly, optical sights were required to run a big battery, almost like a car battery
@filipealarza9079 or WW1. As much as I live BF1, they have optical sights which is bs lol
So basically, Vanguard does some details better, while Battlefield 1 does everything else better.
Bf1 has one of the best atmospheres I've seen in a while
Bf1 also has the best fps game trailer of all time.
Facts+W
@Average Enjoyer 🗿
@soft_dicc and Japan having STG44 💀
Very true
3:15 Sound of the shell dropping changes depends on the environment. For example when you're standing at concrete floor, it will make the sound of shell bouncing off the concrete floor, and in water it'll make a plop sound so it's kinda false.
He’s talking about the shells hitting the wall, the shell doesn’t even hit the wall in the Battlefield demonstration but whatever it’s such a small detail nobody would even notice it
@@thicccheese4007 they do hit the walls in battlefield 5 if I'm not wrong
@@Yeahimman32 were talking about bf1 not bf5
@@scarab9515 and I'm talking about bf5 not bf1
@@Yeahimman32 why are you talking about bf5? You didn’t say you were and in this video bf5 is not even mentioned. We were left to assume you were talking about what was in the time stamps you put.
i like how bf1 is booth a destrutive playground(?) and a good fps shooter
Playground you mean sandbox
kinda so so i guess
And cod is neither
Bf1 has British Empire, French Republic, German Empire, Tsarist Russia, USSR, Ottoman Empire, Austro Hungary, Italian Kingdom and USA as playable factions and they all have complete sets of uniforms, voice lines and intros. Cod Vanguard had my team and enemy team and don't even let you play as Axis side. I think it is more than clear who wins
Also don’t forget the British had different uniforms in the turning tides dlc. On achi baba and cape helles they were wearing the gallipoli campaign uniforms with the shorts. Then on the naval maps they gave them the blue Royal Marines uniform. Probably something a majority of people wouldn’t notice or care about but it was nice none the less.
@@connorh6477 Agreed.
8:06 such a funny detail how every headshot we commited, the hat always transform to a helmet only to confirm the headshot
And don't forget the headshot 'pew-ka-ching' sound 😩👌 it's so damn satisfying.
@@ajtheracer95 ahahah maaan bro e quando lo fai con lo scout la soddisfazione è doppia soprattutto col Martini Henri Fanteria
Even EA Games still shock how they did this game. They never could add a milestone after BF1. Still best game ever.
lol
and BF4
No, the best game ever is Super Smash Bros Brawl
@@ewanawanga hahaha. No
@@Eddiee757 Yes.
To be fair it is realistic for soldiers to dump ammo in ww1, and sometimes in ww2.
In cod you play as modern day airsoft players roleplaying Wolfenstine
Yes, your average, freaked out soldier will not bother about saving mags when he's in the middle of a hellhole
@@ikstarven It sounds sarcastic so I'll say this
If enemies are in your trench and you don't want to risk running out of ammo before killing them, you want the fastest reload possible (not saving the mags).
That's my opinion though, and I'm only a teen so my only experience is nothing.
@@ikstarven Just realized now, saving ammo was only developed in the 80s. During WWI and WWII, soldiers rarely saved ammo.
@@person12321Plus in WW1 most weapons either had internal magazines that you could top off with single rounds or clips, or had small magazines where losing a few rounds would be negligible, not including single shot and belt fed/all kinds of weird and wonderful WW1-era weapons
5:27 I understand the sin but another sin that should’ve been for vanguard is the fact that you tactically reload every single weapon in the game as if you’re some special forces member in 2020
@@utkarshshinde1837 how tf is it for "balance"
Vanguard is just a stupid modern warfare clone with worse quality and less detail.
@@utkarshshinde1837 What "balance"
@@danksouls2523 facts+W
@Miami Sushi hyper did the mw2019 reloads, which is why they're soooo magnificent (search hyper on yt, trust me, you'll see why activison hired him)
Three details:
1: You can even hear raindrops falling on the shells if you listen closely
2: You can throw grenades back in bf1
3: And for reloading, look at the m1912 repetierpistole, he saves the bullets left
Also take a look at the peacekeeper, there are different animations for every reload,
Also when you have only one bullet left in a bolt action, it will in some rifles take out the one bullet so he can reload with a stripper clip, whereas he would reload with single bullets if there is more than one bullet
@I hate myself yeah you're right, I really thought it was possible but I also couldn't find it.
@@faasramaekers You must be thinking of BFV. In that game you can really throw it back for a homie
I think it’s funny how years ago, in World at War getting a headshot in multiplayer would take the whole head off.
Ironically, World at War had the best gibing mechanics out of all COD games, the oldest game to implement that.
@@JP-297 lol legs getting blown off buy snipers lol fun times lol
0:15 no bf1 didn’t need this detail. Get too close the soldier is like “you wot m8”
The last Battlefield game that was made with passion & how DICE core members tried their best to win EA's trust on BF1 since using WW1 as the main setting was never implemented much in many shooter games before judging on how limited potential & fun factor it can be.. but long story short, they successfully created this masterpiece.
The trailer of bf1 still gets me hyped to play the game and I have almost 2000 hours
@@danksouls2523 me the same
The battlefield series is like a constant fight between EA and dice over control of its development, if EA wins you get a shitty game that no one likes filled with micro transactions(early BF5 and BF2042) but if DICE wins they get pour their heart and souls into making the best game they can
@@DerpyUniverse I don't know, I think the old devs have mostly left DICE and it's just a shell.
Battlefield 1 will forever be a masterpiece of a game
5:30 you can reload guns in battlefield 1 too but it depends on which gun. Some rifles have this option.
You can also "trip" on those shells in BF1. If you go prone, and try getting up shortly after. You'll hear a *clang* *clang*, and you'll be forced back into prone. If you mash buttons like I do, hitting the jump button you'll recover almost seemlessly. But this is true, with the action I described anywhere, it's more noticable when you are being supressed or actively taking damage.
Thanks. I will try to include it in next battlefield 1 comparison video
You can also trip if you hit the jump button at the wrong time when you're trying to climb a fence or a wall.
BF1 is in a league of it's own, it's legendary!!
i love how a 5 year old game looks miles better than a game that's just come out.
battlefield one was one of my favorite shooters period, such a great game, and years older than vanguard
too bad online is usually dead...
@@gianilardon5728 that isn't true
@@gabrielnunez855 where do you play on pc or ps?
@@gianilardon5728 In pc its good many servers with full players .
@Random steel I always find at least 20 full servers for operations and 30 for conquest
It's impressive how many details I never consciously noticed; but also that every one goes into making the whole experience as high quality as it is in bf1. Even when you don't notice something is there, you know when it's missing.
Just because you see people keep their rifle “shouldered” while reloading doesn’t mean they’re aiming. Aiming and reloading instead of getting cover/concealment is an insanely ludicrous thing to do. As an earlier comment pointed out, BF1 is an older game no doubt, it still somehow pummels vanguard in the ground
Imagine being compared to a 2016 game that is better made than one taken out in 2021.
Vanguard is from 2021 not 2020 .
@@kuriankeralaIndia True, but that makes it worse, graphics don't save the bad thing that is
@@tfox3777 the graphics look worse than bf1 lmao
@@danksouls2523 yes, that makes it even worse xD
True Battlefield 2042 sucks ass
Even more interesting in BF1 is how the light also moves when the lamp is moving
Can u explain how a 5 yr old game looks better, has more things happening and has way larger maps than the last cod release?
Yeah because cod vanguard was really bad and wash trash even their zombie mode is bad
Easy, BF1 was made with love
Vanguard just was made
@R Unlike Battlefield who releases unfinished games every 2-3 years, much better.
@R Sounds like sports games, too. lol Basically a yearly roster update and every few release gets a new mechanic. lol
Battlefield 1 is a passion-project with a soul.
Vanguard, along with many other Call of Duty’s, are disposable shovelware cash grabs.
Short answer: *Battlefield 1 is better*
Correcto
The best
I feel like bf1 was a passion project from dice. So much love was poured into this game. This game was amazing.
DICE stated it actually was. Apparently before BF1 they were very interested in doing a WW1 game but EA didn't think it would sell well. So DICE had to fight EA to allow it
Battlefield 1 is better in everything, change my mind.
@Geovanni Soaresfor battlefield 1, if you have a good pc, wait for discounts, it usually go down to 10$. It's worth the price!
@Geovanni Soares alr
Bf1 hands looks like a plastic toy
Both game amazing
@Geovanni Soares i can play it smoothly on 900p with all low and TAA. (50-60fps)
3:20 COD shells were hitting two different types of material. BF1 they were hitting the wall and floor made from the same ceramic tile. Point remans though there are some differences, good and bad from both sides.
The only levelheaded comment lol
9:25 i think you mean vanguard but what's the point. vanguard might as well be an expansion pack of warzone by this point.
Its more like expansion for mw19 .
Thats what i said when i first saw gameplay, it feels so bad, and unrealistic
5:33 the reload cycle of the battlefield series of games is more accurate to real life because you want to be able to see how you're loading your gun, if you reload the gun like how it is shown in Vanguard you may accidentally put the magazine in wrong, either upside down or backwards
also how easy is to change it while barely movig the sight right
@@AlexMadhi what?
also in Battlefield 1 the soldiers are not experts they are simple men recruited in the ww1 instead in cod they are "experts"
As a completely biased Battlefield fan, especially that BF1 is my favorite one,
i still have to admit that we should not compare CoD and Battlefield too much.
Models, sounds, effects of explosion are fine but we have to remember that CoD is more arcade game
And for much smaller maps the destruction seen in Battlefield could be too much.
CoD always was a smaller scale game. explosion crater in middle of a map could change a lot in CoD
but in BF it's almost no difference in such huge maps
The destruction has much more of an impact than you say it does in BF1. It can COMPLETELY change how the game is played. Like on Sinai Desert, the very beginning is absolute hell to cross. As the match goes on, more craters are made, and you can use those as cover. St Quentin scar can change quickly too. The town is nearly leveled pretty quick, and it brings more open sightlines. Though, on some maps like Ballroom Blitz, minus destroying the roofing and camping up there have little change. Mainly the ones with one massive structure. Minus Empire's Edge and Fao Fortress, because those forts can be destroyed by the Dreadnought's cannons
@@wildwyatxbox "...the destruction seen in Battlefield could be too much."
i know :3
sometimes i do a hole with my assault to later go there as a recon or support
destruction in BF1 and V gives the player a lot of freedom and strategic opportunities
i just wanted to say that for battlefield it works but in Co on small maps it would mes up the map, CoD is more arcade and maps should be well crafted and always without change
BF1 was so good even EA can't improve over it yet, hope that next bf being developed by the same guys of BF1
@@venommusic2310 now they r replaced by sjw politicians i guess 🤦🏻
If I'm not mistaken, they made a new studio.
Bf is dead
Most of the developing team from bf1 either moved away from EA or retired.
Most of them already left the studio so that's not possible and also EA wants battlefield to be like fortnite so it can attract little kids and make tons in microtransactions so a war focused battlefield will never happen again instead you'll get soldier flossing and dancing emotes
I never noticed these details but they make me appreciate battlefield 1 so much more
2:06 in bf1, shells come immediately with a powder charge, which is why they explode, and in the vanguard are simple blanks without a powder charge. Even if these are land mines, the bullet will not penetrate a thick layer of metal and will not detonate the projectile. So I didn't notice any mistakes here. Or maybe the developer is lazy just)
I was playing BFV the other day when a FlakPanzer was shooting at a friendly tank at an angle. I had never realized this, but half of the rounds would bounce off the tank, but the impressive part is that they would then explode mid air after bouncing off of the tank, that's some crazy cool ballistics and certainly looked sick. I'll never not be impressed by Battlefield games (2042 exempt)
0:43
"Why is this guy throwing dynamite into his smoke grenades? We're going to lose the match."
HOLY CRAP! I've never seeing that cartilage detail before!
i thought Red Dead Redemption.2 started this thing first lol, now i love BF1 even moar
I have been playing bf1 for years at this point and haven’t noticed like 80% of these things
actually we don't need extra details in online shooter game because It causes distraction
Incorrect, we don’t need extra details in *competitive* shooters such as csgo, but details are acceptable and preferred in regular shooters
@@sanjithd3343 respectfully disagree
@@sanjithd3343 in my personal opinion I think gameplay matters the most because even if the game does not look that good it can still be very fun (minecraft is a good example of this)
But I still feel like details are important but not more important than gameplay. But can still be amazing. Including shooters
@@sanjithd3343 I think CS:GO can afford to give extra details like in 1.6 but not too much that it will ruin some maps
Ive always found CoD games to be very static and lifeless when it comes to the maps. Weak physics/no physics at all, no destruction, poor effects and details etc...
This video proves my point once again.
I remember when the ww2 veterans would come to the school and tell us about when they stormed the beaches of Normandy with m1 garands with a drum mag, yellow ring sight, and M1928 compensator
It’s honestly sad to see a game from 2022 be wrecked by a game from 2016. I still play BF1 to this day and it’s still fun. Vanguard is already dead while BF1 is still goin strong.
The last good battlefield game and I still play it to this day. It warms my heart still seeing full lobbies ❤
3:44 is the most scripted looking swing I have ever seen.
You'll counter me with "you missed the joke"
They should've add more joints to the chandelier with that much of detail
5:37 is not true for all guns in BF1, for example use the Ross Mk III infantry and you can ADS and reload at the same time. So this fact is not true at all
5:30 In fact, no one do this in ww1 and ww2, it's only use in modern day for tactical reload
Its almost impossible to do
I have to say that this video is good but in 3:14 you took a c96 version which ejects the spent cardriges upwards. This is therefore not ideal for your point.
3:16
In Battlefield 1, the sound of bullet casings falling to the ground varies depending on the terrain.
But
There is no sound hitting the wall.
8:59
I can't remember what the Vanguard campaign was like.
But in World War 2 campaign
If you hit the head
There were details in which the character's hat or helmet was blown off.
Details and systems such as the reloading motion of Vanguard's guns are not suitable for World War II. It's from Warzone's system.
For example, the act of loading two magazines in one hand or holding a pistol with both hands
(it is correct to hold a pistol with one hand in WWI or WWII) is close to modern warfare rather than WWII.
Details and systems such as the reloading motion of Vanguard's guns are not suitable for World War II. It's from Warzone's system.
Great video likes always keep up the amazing work I love watching your content.
6:35 in real life, it is actually a terrible idea to throw back grenades as they tend to have short fuses so realisticly, bf1 technically won there.
If a grenade lands at my feet and I have nowhere to hide I'm sure as hell gonna try throwing it back. If the fuze is so short I can't, it means it's too short for me to take cover too.
Battlefield 1 voice actors, before recording, would do physically grueling activities to make their voice acting seem more real
10:21 You could've said BF1 mostly has guns that don't save ammo but some guns do like the LMG's that Cycle Ammo back onto the open drum and even the MLE pistol has them save the Ammo.
as a battlefield player I love the detail in vanguard where the player puts the gun away when you come too close that's so amazing
i'm play bf1 since 2016 but bf1 is completely broken shooter but cod shooter still playable after years like bo2 or mw3
@@stitchd1698 yeah it's so broken:( many metas but don't uninstall the game raging at it it costs money
@@stitchd1698 Its is not broken at all, i have never encountered a glitch if battle field 1
@@Paratzu im not talking about glitches i mean shooter and gameplay is broken but sound and atmosphere is fire
@@stitchd1698 Its not really that broken. I had allot of fun with it. Although its subjective. Spawning can be annoying but thankfully you choose where to spawn.
6:45 you can throw back a grenade in BF1, in ps4 you use the square button. The effect is like the grenade gets kicked away from you
this also works on xbox
Exactly
And yet 2042 is a downgrade in everything.
in BF1, when alot of players are grouped up and and heading in a direction, they start to battlecry
There are many FPS games that I played, but BF1 is the game that I played the most, EVER. I still play it almost everyday.
COD, on the other hand, for me, the last one that I really liked was Modern Warfare. The other CODs that I like are COD2 and WaW. But none are like BF1.
battlefield 1 has so much detail that they detailed a nose and ears
I love how BF1 is more detailed than a ‘brand new top notch game’
Battlefield One is fucking legendary. Dice will never make a game like that again. Once in a lifetime type of game.
كنصيحة
• عند الوضوء كن شاباً وتوضأ بنشاط.
• عند الصلاة كن عجوزاً وصلي بهدوء.
• وعند الدعاء كن طفلاً لحوحاً يبكي ويترجى
So at 1:27 are we going to completely ignore the call of duty ghost patch on the battlefield character❓❓
Blowing craters in the ground is the funnest thing to do in Battlefield
For me it's the battle crys. They give me goosebumps sometimes. (Most likely because I'm new player only 5 days since it was on sale $8. Best $8 I've ever spent in years!!!
4:23 damn, when you break it, it sounds like you killed a character in Lego
I like that battlefield 1 manages to keep this level of detail while still being fun to play, it manages to stay somewhat accurate even though it's not sandstorm or post scriptum.
Fun fact: Proning in BF1 changes the dispersion direction of the smoke
2 years later! Nobody remembers call of duty and everybody still playing bf1
Debo decir que gracias a que la vegetación con movimiento dinámico en el mapa con el cuerpo de los jugadores muchas veces me a dado ideas de donde se encuentra escondido el campero, realmente muchos de los detalles son increíbles y siempre es de agradecer que los programadores consideran agregarlos al juego final por que le da calidad de vida al juego
bf1 es mucho mejor que bf2042
@@Habibi618 BFH es más BF que 2042
11:06
You can see the frustration in the chat when hes asking his friend to aim
one big thing that bf1 has (not entirely sure on vanguard or maybe it is not even applicable as a comparison if the equivalent docent exist in vanguard:
in bf1 clip size matters, if you reload a bolt action rifle that has say 5 bullets shot, the soldier will use a speed loader to load 5 bullets immediately
if only like 3 bullets are used, the soldier will open the bolt, and load three individual shells in instead.
There’s a problem with the sight you have on the weapon in vanguard. Those sights did exist but only for aircraft because there’s a light in there reflecting off of some glass, and the guns in Ww2 were assigned to you and you needed to give them back after your use of it.
8:30 falling helmet on headshots.. even very old Call Of Duty 2 have that animation~ shame on vanguard
That detail on the wall boucing shells on Vanguard is pretty cool but insufficient to beat those BF1 and BFV (yes BFV is insane in terms of details, wee bit less for immersion unfortunately...)
Bf1 still better
3:11 Hold on a second. In BF1, if you shot over a wood floor, the dropping sound it's tottaly different from the regular one. You're not seeing all the ditails mate
In BF1 you take less damage from explosives the closer you are to the ground. Also there’s a form of stop, drop, and roll in BF1 if you just lay down while on fire to stop the burning effect.
Laying down to avoid grenades is a real life thing that soldiers do because grenades explode upward. It's something that most games don't seem to do.
Battlefield 1 is far superior. A shame 2042 was a poor release.
Did you know that vanguard actually won the worst game of the year medal. Who'd a thought that a cod game could be that bad 😤.
did you know that medal of yours don't even exist xD
@@yyahc1973 yeah I know I was joking, but if there was a "worst game of the year medal" vanguard would get it 8 times in a row 😂.
@@Anthony20084 2042 exists
@@kevinsteelflex7371 at least 2042 is something new and interesting and fun and seeing your comments on other vids your clearly just blind hating the game, 2042 may suck for sure but it isn’t a bland dlc for a previous game
Vanguard's a slap in the face to actual history
The only thing they got right in this game was that WW2 happened
@Moa Moa except that they did
@Moa Moa A bad background with cursed guns
@Moa Moa Cursed guns still
@Moa Moa still cursed guns and trash story
I see no one talking about Easter eggs so I will. Battlefield 1 had some cool ass Easter eggs!! There were unique weapons and skins to unlock, as well as dog tags! God the amount of detail given to them was incredible. I can’t even remember a single mw2019 or Cold War Easter egg. Or vanguard
BF1 & 5 are amazing with so much attentiontodetail. They dopped the ball massively with 2042...
Call of Duty Vanguard is one of the worst Cod games... What do you expect? Battlefield 1 is obviously better!
BF1 was ahead of it's time when it came out. Pure brilliance
Battlefield=🥵💪
COD= 🏳️🌈🤡
Minecraft 🐀 🐭 🌈
@@papadewoody2490 COD= 🌈🤡🌈
@@Niddez minecraft 🌈 🐀 🐭 🤡 🌈
At 8:00 green on the Sherman is just absolutely cursed like I have seen real Sherman’s and they are dark green
I'm kinda glad Battlefield 1 doens't reload while aiming. Youd miss out on the gorgeous reloads.
BF1: Best EA game ever made…
Change My Mind
I won't because your opinion is actually good
mw 2005
@@maxart4488
it was easy to find the best game made by EA
@Atoms i would agree with that if you are telling the best battlefield series game
Bruh you're like 14, you probably haven't played many games published by EA that came before BF1 lmao
The ammo thing is realistic for the time. COD Vanguard has soldiers reloading like they're super tactical special forces when, in reality, they were just kids with very little training.
7:30 a mimir
Ok idk why people think aiming with one eye closed is a good small detail… it’s a wrong detail.
Marksman always shoot with both eyes open because closing one eye really limits your field of vision and eliminates half of your peripheral vision.
And when you’re in an active Warzone you don’t want to be shooting half blind.
I hate it when games do that, too
But its easyer to aim with one eye closed and the soldiers in ww1 were very poorly trained.
@@Dimi.._._ easier to aim… but otherwise ineffective by comparison. Limiting your vision in a Warzone is the least pragmatic decision to make my guy. And soldier don’t do that anyway.
Fucking impossible to aim with both eyes open, well maybe it is because im not a army sniper.
@@Omega14343 but in a game where the characters you play as are supposedly in the military… both eyes being open make much more sense.
Starting to pick up what I’m putting down lad?
Bf1 is a hell of a game. Definetly one of my favorites