You can't "Accept for Deposit and Value". Those are opposing terms. Acceptance for value means you've performed and are operating in honor of the reorganization of the Emergency Banking Act. You have to understand what you're doing by acceptance and why it's being sent back to the corporation. Making it an instrument to be deposited makes it a non-negotiable instrument. What you want is to convey a negotiable instrument back to them, one which they can in turn convey/transfer right title and interest to the Treasury, thereby completing a valuable exchange. It's a good attempt, but you're missing some very key elements here. I recommend keeping up your bill payments until you get remedy going this route.
@@willtuanaki1854 🤦♂️ love it. Thankfully I was keeping up on em. Thank you for your clarification here as well. Your words are helpful for everyone who wants to pay attention! I see the difference now.
Man! I’m excited for you! I haven’t actually done anything yet. There are definitely many creators talking about this. I’ve listened to a lot. I’d like to see the outcome of this BOE. Thank you for sharing. I’ll never forget the statement: If you want to hide something put it in a book.
We're currently suing Synchrony Bank in federal district court for breach of contract over non-acceptance of negotiable instruments tendered for payment on a PayPal credit card. I don't think it really matters that much beyond what's spelled out in the Bill of exchange Act how to indorse a bill. There's nothing else available to pay with.
@@CameronPrickett unless a demand is made ie; "demand for lawful money per 12USC411'', check out lawful money clause, critical [recognized by congress/irs] yet seldom mentioned, would be a loose end that many 'instructing' on these matters online leads one to skepticism on if the multitudes watching are being set up to fail
Only thing I don't agree with that code as it's not what it means nor does it apply to what people think it does. Reading titles matters followed by section and in this case of section it's irrelevant. I'd say people should be more focused on understanding whether or not why we're in a debt wealth society when you read the Federal Reserve Act, Modern Money Mechenics, the entirety of HJR-192 and not the sexy sound bytes you hear on the internet with a paragraph only, and last but not least reading UCC 3, the UNICITRAL Model Law, and understanding GAAP because it's all accounting. Oh and a big thing, 7/10 times they will reject this because they either don't read, refuse to read, or a highly incompetent meaning you have to take them to court by way of administrative process. If that's something you're not ready for doing, stop what you're doing and study more to understand than to bum rush into a situation where you're not ready to stand on what you know.
Are you, yourself, a _Bank_ ? (The specific instructions you read from Cornell Law clearly states in the title of the section, and in the summary, that this section and endorsement is For Banks.) Wouldn't you rather convert it from a _Bearer Security_ (check) to a _Book Entry Security_ (credit) to your account?
@@j.pocket you bring up a great point. If the ens legis is not a bank, then there may be problems here. How do you go about converting such security in that way?
It IS technically legal. Most Law is commercial jurisdiction, US is a corporation which sets up corpses for each "Citizen" born in it's jurisdiction. Ur social security card is insurance on your 'Trust' issued by a bank. Usury is technically illegal 😂 but over the years they finagled work arounds so much that it has become commonplace to just accept what we are told about how money, currency, & promissory notes ACTUALLY work. They have not had to deal with this in decades and will not know what to do. The way I know this is true is because we all learned as children that if u don't have a check IT IS LEGAL to write on a napkin if you write the right things. 🤑
I've sent some others as well, but I've only faced roadblocks from the institutions. I'm learning that it's more about informing the governing body of your state/country that you're no longer a minor and wish to gain guardianship over your person and estate.
@@CameronPricketti just recently learned this as well, in that its more effective to go thru the necessary processes/paperwork to have your Age of Majority placed on the record before sending in restrictive indorsements, even though not doing so could work as well (but likely with some form of arbitrarion or litigation). Does that sound accurate to you too?
@@Overth_inc Very true. I've been continually studying since I made this video, and that part is very important. It's important that you do that through the county in which you were born/your ens legis was registered.
The company didn't mark my account as paid. They have a third party accept the payments by mail. So if I were to obtain remedy on this particular case, I'd have to go through the court, and use the administrative process and contract law to my advantage.
Well this video confirms this guy's completely Goshen us. All the terms he has attempted to use have either countered themselves or gave wrong explanation with wrong remittence performing outline. Ok if settling an account u will credit the same to , transfer principle to xyz company deposit same to minor acct listed within terms expressed in cover page. Must tender to treasury when looking recive lawfull payment whichbis tran a fering of credits to tda registered through living estate or forign grantor trust.. stop playing buddy.. some if us are savvyy in this form of bennifets accommodated through new deal and emgemcy banking act as well as endorsement procedures of a new deal or new kind. Restrictive is when u stated whom thus payable to such as bearer etc.. signing without listing payee via payable to is blank endorsement . Those must tender to to u.s. treasury or fiscal services dept. Xyz still cresit same to .. must direct what the intrest instructed as to. Btw this is not administering estate in completion this is merrily billing statement instruction from acting agent yeah . Get u some folks.
And lockdowns based on fraud have serious consequences. Fraud committed by governments and CEOs of most organisations. Look into it. Your SIGNATURE creates the money. The trust was put in place for this reason
You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen. That’s oxymoron. A citizen is a slave. A sovereign is not. We are sovereign at birth but the certificate turned us into bonded ‘stock’
the government system is a fraud. it states in their own regulation from 1933 that there is no money and thats the remdy instead themselves commiting treason
Whats up Cam, So how did it turn out? Ive had success with the a4v / r4d (restricted endorsement "for deposit only") i wnt and ordered rubber stamps in order to make it more professional and only then did it start to work its magic.
You can't "Accept for Deposit and Value". Those are opposing terms. Acceptance for value means you've performed and are operating in honor of the reorganization of the Emergency Banking Act. You have to understand what you're doing by acceptance and why it's being sent back to the corporation. Making it an instrument to be deposited makes it a non-negotiable instrument. What you want is to convey a negotiable instrument back to them, one which they can in turn convey/transfer right title and interest to the Treasury, thereby completing a valuable exchange. It's a good attempt, but you're missing some very key elements here. I recommend keeping up your bill payments until you get remedy going this route.
@@willtuanaki1854 🤦♂️ love it. Thankfully I was keeping up on em. Thank you for your clarification here as well. Your words are helpful for everyone who wants to pay attention! I see the difference now.
Read to the end, and it will tell you how to endorse a coupon to the Treasury, not Fedral Reserve Bank.
Follow the instructions exactly.
There is more you need to do when you send this stuff out but thank you for showing your legal standing and research.
Great demonstration! A lot of information in 3min. That's Great. Much-needed & appreciated.🎉🎉😊
@@secretary.of.estatechief-c6220 thank you!!
Man! I’m excited for you! I haven’t actually done anything yet. There are definitely many creators talking about this. I’ve listened to a lot. I’d like to see the outcome of this BOE. Thank you for sharing. I’ll never forget the statement: If you want to hide something put it in a book.
Thanks for the content sir .God speed to you . Any word as some process are up hill and take forever
Nice channel, show them first what freedom looks like, then demonstrate in real life how to get there.
We're currently suing Synchrony Bank in federal district court for breach of contract over non-acceptance of negotiable instruments tendered for payment on a PayPal credit card.
I don't think it really matters that much beyond what's spelled out in the Bill of exchange Act how to indorse a bill. There's nothing else available to pay with.
ive also recently and successfully completed a cancellation of debt or debt discharge with a 1099a, 1099c, and form 1096.
When they "discharge the debt", they will send you a 1099C, and it will be counted as an income that is taxable
, correct?
@@mrDADtheSecond I do believe you’re correct.
@@CameronPrickett unless a demand is made ie; "demand for lawful money per 12USC411'', check out lawful money clause, critical [recognized by congress/irs] yet seldom mentioned, would be a loose end that many 'instructing' on these matters online leads one to skepticism on if the multitudes watching are being set up to fail
It clearly states that in cfr 328.6, the endorsement you should write.
328.5 + 328.6 (like indiana jones and the one sided burned hand medallion... must use both to be correct.)
Only thing I don't agree with that code as it's not what it means nor does it apply to what people think it does. Reading titles matters followed by section and in this case of section it's irrelevant. I'd say people should be more focused on understanding whether or not why we're in a debt wealth society when you read the Federal Reserve Act, Modern Money Mechenics, the entirety of HJR-192 and not the sexy sound bytes you hear on the internet with a paragraph only, and last but not least reading UCC 3, the UNICITRAL Model Law, and understanding GAAP because it's all accounting. Oh and a big thing, 7/10 times they will reject this because they either don't read, refuse to read, or a highly incompetent meaning you have to take them to court by way of administrative process. If that's something you're not ready for doing, stop what you're doing and study more to understand than to bum rush into a situation where you're not ready to stand on what you know.
Are you, yourself, a _Bank_ ? (The specific instructions you read from Cornell Law clearly states in the title of the section, and in the summary, that this section and endorsement is For Banks.)
Wouldn't you rather convert it from a _Bearer Security_ (check) to a _Book Entry Security_ (credit) to your account?
@@j.pocket you bring up a great point. If the ens legis is not a bank, then there may be problems here. How do you go about converting such security in that way?
Get your private individual bankers ein now you're a bank
Be your own bank!
@@atxlumberjakeyou don’t need none of that lol just stamp,indorse and send
@@auditingamerikkka1627 have you had a successful sign endorse send? I did it for my truck but have not received any remedy.
Has anyone actually firsthand seen this work?
It IS technically legal. Most Law is commercial jurisdiction, US is a corporation which sets up corpses for each "Citizen" born in it's jurisdiction. Ur social security card is insurance on your 'Trust' issued by a bank. Usury is technically illegal 😂 but over the years they finagled work arounds so much that it has become commonplace to just accept what we are told about how money, currency, & promissory notes ACTUALLY work. They have not had to deal with this in decades and will not know what to do.
The way I know this is true is because we all learned as children that if u don't have a check IT IS LEGAL to write on a napkin if you write the right things. 🤑
Yes, multiple times in various ways.
supposed to send to the Treasury i think
Did it go through? I've sent several coupons that are quite similar to yours and haven't been accepted yet.
I've sent some others as well, but I've only faced roadblocks from the institutions. I'm learning that it's more about informing the governing body of your state/country that you're no longer a minor and wish to gain guardianship over your person and estate.
@@CameronPricketti just recently learned this as well, in that its more effective to go thru the necessary processes/paperwork to have your Age of Majority placed on the record before sending in restrictive indorsements, even though not doing so could work as well (but likely with some form of arbitrarion or litigation). Does that sound accurate to you too?
@@Overth_inc Very true. I've been continually studying since I made this video, and that part is very important. It's important that you do that through the county in which you were born/your ens legis was registered.
The company didn't mark my account as paid. They have a third party accept the payments by mail. So if I were to obtain remedy on this particular case, I'd have to go through the court, and use the administrative process and contract law to my advantage.
Hopefully you don't have to that for every acct. Did you formally accept the agreement ?
🤦 Well, he did spell Endorsement with an "I", so....
That is the way it is supposed to be… with an I and not with an E
Well this video confirms this guy's completely Goshen us. All the terms he has attempted to use have either countered themselves or gave wrong explanation with wrong remittence performing outline. Ok if settling an account u will credit the same to , transfer principle to xyz company deposit same to minor acct listed within terms expressed in cover page. Must tender to treasury when looking recive lawfull payment whichbis tran a fering of credits to tda registered through living estate or forign grantor trust.. stop playing buddy.. some if us are savvyy in this form of bennifets accommodated through new deal and emgemcy banking act as well as endorsement procedures of a new deal or new kind. Restrictive is when u stated whom thus payable to such as bearer etc.. signing without listing payee via payable to is blank endorsement . Those must tender to to u.s. treasury or fiscal services dept. Xyz still cresit same to .. must direct what the intrest instructed as to. Btw this is not administering estate in completion this is merrily billing statement instruction from acting agent yeah . Get u some folks.
@@thrillbillyjp1 thanks for the clarification! Just trying to sort it all out!
Does not work. Will not work.
Can you validate that in a public policy for me?
I just turned one in to capital one
Has anybody had luck with capital yet?
I heard they’re difficult to get through
@@Gabe_realm Nice! I don’t use CapitalOne, but from what I’ve heard, they either send you to collections or cancel your credit line/card.
😂😂😂😂😂
This is that soverign citizen stupidity. This is not realistic and you are being lied to, trying to cash one of these " real checks" is a felony
And lockdowns based on fraud have serious consequences. Fraud committed by governments and CEOs of most organisations. Look into it. Your SIGNATURE creates the money. The trust was put in place for this reason
You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen. That’s oxymoron. A citizen is a slave. A sovereign is not. We are sovereign at birth but the certificate turned us into bonded ‘stock’
The entire UCC is bunk...is that what you're saying? XD
Do you understand that this is fraud?
Supply the proof...
It’s fraud to the fools wearing the “obey” hat that has been falsely indoctrinated at birth. “They” do it twice while you are committed to the lie!
its ok muggle.
the government system is a fraud. it states in their own regulation from 1933 that there is no money and thats the remdy instead themselves commiting treason
lmfaoooooo
Whats up Cam, So how did it turn out? Ive had success with the a4v / r4d (restricted endorsement "for deposit only") i wnt and ordered rubber stamps in order to make it more professional and only then did it start to work its magic.
What did your rubber stamp say?