Rice, Kane & Bellingham all went for BIG money, and all of them have more than lived up it…which doesn’t always happen when guys go for a high transfer fee Cole Palmer has been unbelievable for Chelsea though, I can’t imagine where they’d be without him!
Love this guys! Recently commented on one of Joe’s videos saying that I really hope we see some reaction videos at the end of the season to your pre season predictions. Always some of the funniest videos every year and would involve less prep for you guys as well which should be helpful I’m sure! There’s a 1-20, SV predictions and EFD predictions at least and then there’s more videos where ye predicted how successful certain transfers etc would be so would be great to see ye go through some of those again at the end of the season! Keep up the great work, love seeing the 3 of ye doing shoots together 👍🏻
Bring Hamil back… never thought I’d miss him this much. I’ve been watching since 2016 & you all have a place in my heart. I remember Amanda & Kieran as well. I used to drive LONG hours when I was serving in the military & I would play the videos on the road trips. I remember Kieran & his Shalke Show. Now they’re far gone & so is the grew 😢
I personally disagree with Dougie. I think that while value for money is important, for the best clubs in the world signing the best players possible is way more important. If you are a Real Madrid, Man City, etc would you sign a 100m jude bellingham or a 30m Mac Allister? We can easily say that Mac Allister is the "better" signing because his value is more worth it, but for these clubs value of money isn't as important as signing players that can potentially change your season to a league contender to potentially a treble winner. So while yes, value is important, context is important and thus I argue that players like Jude Bellingham and Declan Rice deserve higher spots.
Palmer hasn’t transformed Chelsea for going from 11th to 9th but rice has transformed arsenal for going from 2nd to 2nd. Don’t get me wrong I love both the players but the argument is inconsistent
I understand Dougies rationale. Like if you are rating transfers you have to take the business into account. It’s no slight to the more expensive players but like finding a player who can score you 20 goals or more for anything less than 70 million in today’s market is an absolute steal and is credit to football business and scouting.
I feel I’ve there’s a bit of inconsistency here , you guys probably should have discussed whether you were ranking the best players signed this season. Or the best signings , factoring in value , Kane and Jude were signed for 90mil+ but have been top 5 players this season
@@FootballDaily They definitely ARE a bit much. I can't be the only one who doesn't click on a vid when they see over-the-top facial expressions in a video. ESPECIALLY when they have nothing to do with the title of the video. Been watching for around 6 years btw.
I really miss the constant uploads, have watched this channel for at least 5+ years now irrc. People leaving, going from 2 to 1 channels and now three uploads a week if we are lucky. Therefore my question is, as a community what can we do to help. I love the job you guys do, if I would live there would be submitting my application ASAP. Love to see you three left triumph but would be great to see the channel grow and not stagnate.
Saying Palmer hasn’t transformed Chelsea because they’ve gone from 12th to 9th whilst saying Rice has transformed Arsenal that have gone from 2nd to 2nd and finishing on similar points tally is interesting
There are two ways of doing this list and I think that's where the disagreement comes from. One way is "Would you rather sign Bellingham for €103 million or Openda for €38.5 million?" and I think most teams/people would pick Bellingham for €103 million. The other way is "What is a more impressive signing? Bellingham for €103 million or Openda for €38.5 million?", where I think anyone could see that Bellingham for that price was a great deal, but Leipzig deserve more credit for taking the risk of signing Openda. You also have to decide how much you're going to value this season, compared to the signing as a whole when their careers are all said and done. For this season only, Xhaka for free has been better for Leverkusen than Micky van de Ven has been for Tottenham, but personally I'd rather have Van de Ven for €40 million, because he's going to be one of the best CBs in the world for years to come.
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Some of you lot need to stop being hipsters with your picks. If it's a good signing, it's a good signing. Rice and Kane are clearly good signings and should be on every list. Bellingham has basically secured the league for Real Madrid in the first half of the season, he was amazing in the Super Copa final, amazing in the Champions League. A 20 year old midfielder in his debut season for Real Madrid will never do more than Jude has done. Literally broke some of CR7's goalscoring records. Favourite for the ballon d'or. Worth 3 times the amount they paid. But he's "8th". Just because he's 100 mil, shouldn't make the signing lower rated. That's the signings top clubs need to make. And according to the title, loans shouldn't count. A loan is literally not a signing.
Dougie's logic of value for money is bs. Bellingham has close to 30g/a, is going to be a league winner, is in a ucl and might win that also win that. Rice similarly has made arsenal better defensively and attacking wise and they are rn again in a title run with 4 games left. He pciked Kane at 9 also which is stupid given he has done everything possible on an individual level and might still win the ucl. And like Joe and McCubbin reasoned, a bigger price tag is more expectations and more downside of being labelled a flop than somebody being signed for 20-30M and them performing, coz expectations are not that high to begin with
Bellingham being world class and unbelievable because of his goal contributions, does that mean Frank Lampard was ahead of time or was he taken for granted?
Admire Dougie’s spirit behind value for money, but players get wages so nobody is really free Bellingham has won golden boy and will get a podium finish for the Ballon d’Or the following year? It’s got to be him
How is Macalister only 9th!!! He's been absolutely amazing and instrumental to Liverpool. Only Kane and Bellingham have been better signings this season. Rice is close
When you buy Harry Kane for that much money at his age you can't have a season without trophies which is highly possible so it's absolutely not 100% a great signing
I’m sorry but it just always seems like Dougie is arguing for a different prompt than everyone else. Makes for a very frustrating watch, in what feels like every time he’s on the screen.
Dougie makes the most ridiculous over the top comments and then moans when he gets clipped. Like when he said that Brighton can win Serie A. There's no way he just called Thuram being up there with Pogba and Pirlo after one season. Is he even better than Cambiasso as a free agent or Klose?
I get so bored of talking about how much a player was bought for. It makes no difference whether that player should perform at a high level or not. Its not the player's fault that one club values a player 100 mil and another club pays that. We seem to throw all logical thinking out the window immediately if they are expensive. The money paid for a player has ZERO impact on how that player should perform. We expect a player like mudryk to come in from the Ukrainian league and hit the ground running in the prem just because he was expensive. Instead of actually looking at a player who cost a lot but saying well, he is actually only 20,21 years old playing in a country hes not used to at a level hes not used to? The money should never come into consideration when talking about how good players are.
Gyorkares is the next Darwin. Plays with his head down and only uses power to beat the keeper. “Chaotic” on the ball too, like a wind back car with one stuck wheel. The only thing worse than his projected ability is when he performs crap in England there will “expected” excuses, “so much more than goals”.
so according to Dougie's logic: you shouldn't really be praised for free transfer because they aren't risky. also according to him: If you spend 100 mil on worldbreakers like Rice, Kane or Jude, these signings can't be best of the year cause why are you paying the market value for extremely good players?!? (cringe) I guess good signings are when you buy nonames from mid table teams for around 30 mil and they play slightly above expectations. thank God Joe and Michael where here to save the vid
transfer fee is a hughe factor, to say otherwise you can just have a list of the best players and not consider money spent. money spent is the number one correlation of success in football. paying 100m for a player is insane and you should expect amazing thngs. Rice, Kane and Bellinham have maybe performed above expectations, but not in terms of transfer fee in my opinion.
Of course you should take the fee into consideration. my problem is that aparently you can't be signing of the season if the club paid 100 mil for you. or at least top 3. I'd still put grimaldo as no1, but damn the standard is high for jude. he went for exactly the price that any club would've bought him for. and while last summer it seemed exagerated to pay 100 mil, the dude won la liga almost by himself with all the goals in the first half of the season. Dougie mentioned the risk factor involved in his rating and then he goes and puts the safest transfer of the window on no1
@@seemyskill5543 Did you watch the legs against Bayern? The guy was shambolic. Directly responsible for 3 goals conceded, he doesn't have a progressive pass in his body. He's just an expensive Gareth Barry
You desperately try to force in some great value for money signinings in there and you argue with complete bogus like risk taken. We already know the outcome of risks taken for every signing. Why do you make episode about best signings when you have need to show in some players that are just plain worse than others you overlook? Just make episode about best budget signings or something. Lately you just make episodes when you desperately try to show off your knowledge and nonsensical criteria while making choices.
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Dougie always takes the assignment in a lot more literal sense than anyone, love it, always an interesting list
Dougie’s trim looking absolutely fire 🔥 this weekend
A fresh shave! 🪒
(Dougie)
@@FootballDaily yeah a good look
Rice, Kane & Bellingham all went for BIG money, and all of them have more than lived up it…which doesn’t always happen when guys go for a high transfer fee
Cole Palmer has been unbelievable for Chelsea though, I can’t imagine where they’d be without him!
Love this guys! Recently commented on one of Joe’s videos saying that I really hope we see some reaction videos at the end of the season to your pre season predictions. Always some of the funniest videos every year and would involve less prep for you guys as well which should be helpful I’m sure! There’s a 1-20, SV predictions and EFD predictions at least and then there’s more videos where ye predicted how successful certain transfers etc would be so would be great to see ye go through some of those again at the end of the season!
Keep up the great work, love seeing the 3 of ye doing shoots together 👍🏻
Joe adds a lot of personality here, his reactions are great! 😂 Just laughs at Dougie and Mikey when he doesn’t agree with them
Great content, good to see you actually having debate and different viewpoints. Love this, thanks so much ❤
Bring Hamil back… never thought I’d miss him this much. I’ve been watching since 2016 & you all have a place in my heart. I remember Amanda & Kieran as well. I used to drive LONG hours when I was serving in the military & I would play the videos on the road trips. I remember Kieran & his Shalke Show. Now they’re far gone & so is the grew 😢
Camp Arifjan and Coleman, Tompkins watching them
One of my fave Sunday vibes in a while, your passion really comes through in this episode
Have to agree with Dougie's approach here. At least he's the most consistent with the approach.
I personally disagree with Dougie. I think that while value for money is important, for the best clubs in the world signing the best players possible is way more important. If you are a Real Madrid, Man City, etc would you sign a 100m jude bellingham or a 30m Mac Allister? We can easily say that Mac Allister is the "better" signing because his value is more worth it, but for these clubs value of money isn't as important as signing players that can potentially change your season to a league contender to potentially a treble winner. So while yes, value is important, context is important and thus I argue that players like Jude Bellingham and Declan Rice deserve higher spots.
I find myself agreeing more with Dougie than with Joe. Joe overrates English players to no limit
😂😮
(Dougie)
I love the work you all do, one of the best podcasts by far. 35 goals for Harry Kane so far but he just makes the top 5!
Sunday is perfect Now ❤❤❤
Palmer hasn’t transformed Chelsea for going from 11th to 9th but rice has transformed arsenal for going from 2nd to 2nd. Don’t get me wrong I love both the players but the argument is inconsistent
joe's reactions. amazing
Video title is "Best Signings" not "Best Players who Signed"😂 Dougie's approach is correct. @me
I understand Dougies rationale. Like if you are rating transfers you have to take the business into account. It’s no slight to the more expensive players but like finding a player who can score you 20 goals or more for anything less than 70 million in today’s market is an absolute steal and is credit to football business and scouting.
Dougie is really knowledgeable
I feel I’ve there’s a bit of inconsistency here , you guys probably should have discussed whether you were ranking the best players signed this season.
Or the best signings , factoring in value , Kane and Jude were signed for 90mil+ but have been top 5 players this season
Dougie hating on Liverpool, nah couldn’t be 👀
Haha did I?! It’s a strange narrative because they are one of my favourite Prem sides
(Dougie)
I don't often say this but Joe's 100% right how could you say that a potential ballon d'or winner is NOT in your top 10 best transfers
you guys must have a blast taking the thumbnail photos lmao
Hahaha we do! Think sometimes they are a bit much
(Dougie)
@@FootballDaily They definitely ARE a bit much. I can't be the only one who doesn't click on a vid when they see over-the-top facial expressions in a video. ESPECIALLY when they have nothing to do with the title of the video. Been watching for around 6 years btw.
@@SteveAustin-zv1nn you clicked this one?
I really miss the constant uploads, have watched this channel for at least 5+ years now irrc. People leaving, going from 2 to 1 channels and now three uploads a week if we are lucky.
Therefore my question is, as a community what can we do to help. I love the job you guys do, if I would live there would be submitting my application ASAP. Love to see you three left triumph but would be great to see the channel grow and not stagnate.
it's so funny that the english "heated" debate would be the most polite conversation here in Italy 😂😂
Saying Palmer hasn’t transformed Chelsea because they’ve gone from 12th to 9th whilst saying Rice has transformed Arsenal that have gone from 2nd to 2nd and finishing on similar points tally is interesting
There are two ways of doing this list and I think that's where the disagreement comes from.
One way is "Would you rather sign Bellingham for €103 million or Openda for €38.5 million?" and I think most teams/people would pick Bellingham for €103 million.
The other way is "What is a more impressive signing? Bellingham for €103 million or Openda for €38.5 million?", where I think anyone could see that Bellingham for that price was a great deal, but Leipzig deserve more credit for taking the risk of signing Openda.
You also have to decide how much you're going to value this season, compared to the signing as a whole when their careers are all said and done. For this season only, Xhaka for free has been better for Leverkusen than Micky van de Ven has been for Tottenham, but personally I'd rather have Van de Ven for €40 million, because he's going to be one of the best CBs in the world for years to come.
I love how Joe progressively got frustrated 😠 by Dougie. 😅😂
If Palmer is doing all this just so Chelsea are in 10th for majority of the season, why isn’t Ross Barkley not even getting a shout ?
Always liked Barkley since his early days. Shame his career wasn't bigger.
Cos he’s not leading the scoring charts?
"Mysterious point about value," Joe! 😂
The Holy Trinity is back to make my Sunday!!
10 Sommer
9 Thuram
8 Kane
7 Rice
6 Gyokeres
5 Palmer
4 Dovbyk
3 Bellingham
2 Guirassy
1 Grimaldo
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
I’m with Dougy regarding the definition of signing
Dougie is that one guy that wants to be different 😂
Some of you lot need to stop being hipsters with your picks. If it's a good signing, it's a good signing. Rice and Kane are clearly good signings and should be on every list. Bellingham has basically secured the league for Real Madrid in the first half of the season, he was amazing in the Super Copa final, amazing in the Champions League. A 20 year old midfielder in his debut season for Real Madrid will never do more than Jude has done. Literally broke some of CR7's goalscoring records. Favourite for the ballon d'or. Worth 3 times the amount they paid. But he's "8th". Just because he's 100 mil, shouldn't make the signing lower rated. That's the signings top clubs need to make.
And according to the title, loans shouldn't count. A loan is literally not a signing.
Yann Sommer 🇨🇭 (1)
Raffaele Di Gennaro 🇮🇹 (12)
Emil Audero 🇮🇹 (77)
Stefan de Vrij 🇳🇱 (6)
Francesco Acerbi 🇮🇹 (15)
Benjamin Pavard 🇫🇷 (28)
Yann-Aurel Bisseck 🇩🇪 (31)
Federico DiMarco 🇮🇹 (32)
Matteo Darmian 🇮🇹 (36)
Alessandro Bastoni 🇮🇹 (95)
Denzel Dumfries 🇳🇱 (2)
Stefano Sensi 🇮🇹 (5)
Juan Cuadrado 🇨🇴 (7)
Davy Klaassen 🇳🇱 (14)
Davide Frattesi 🇮🇹 (16)
Tajon Trevor Buchanan 🇨🇦 (17)
Hakan Çalhanoglu 🇹🇷 (20)
Kristjan Asllani 🇦🇱 (21)
Henrikh Mkhitaryan 🇦🇲 (22)
Nicolò Barella 🇮🇹 (23)
Carlos Augusto Zopolato Neves 🇧🇷 (30)
Marko Arnautović 🇦🇹 (8)
Marcus Thuram 🇫🇷 (9)
[C] Lautaro Martínez 🇦🇷 (10)
Alexis Sánchez 🇨🇱 (70)
Kane not making the list seems crazy
The only right answer is Palmer 🥶
The guy in the middle 😂
Allegris Juventus from 2015- 18 >>>>>
Dougie's logic of value for money is bs. Bellingham has close to 30g/a, is going to be a league winner, is in a ucl and might win that also win that. Rice similarly has made arsenal better defensively and attacking wise and they are rn again in a title run with 4 games left. He pciked Kane at 9 also which is stupid given he has done everything possible on an individual level and might still win the ucl.
And like Joe and McCubbin reasoned, a bigger price tag is more expectations and more downside of being labelled a flop than somebody being signed for 20-30M and them performing, coz expectations are not that high to begin with
Bellingham being world class and unbelievable because of his goal contributions, does that mean Frank Lampard was ahead of time or was he taken for granted?
Lampard wasn't taken for granted, widely regarded alongside Gerrard and Scholes and being the 3 best English midfielders in the last 30 years
Admire Dougie’s spirit behind value for money, but players get wages so nobody is really free
Bellingham has won golden boy and will get a podium finish for the Ballon d’Or the following year? It’s got to be him
McCubs trying to defend no Harry Kane is just ridiculous😂
Dougie completely ignoring the huge commissions and wages Inter paid for Marcus Thuram
How is Macalister only 9th!!! He's been absolutely amazing and instrumental to Liverpool. Only Kane and Bellingham have been better signings this season. Rice is close
Kane not even on It😮. This is the worst list you guys have ever made
I was screaming for Chelsea to sign Grimaldo for 5 years. No one ever listened😂
Using the excuse Chelsea have gone from 12th to 9th that Cole hasn’t transformed Chelsea is dumber. When Arsenal have gone from 2nd to 2nd
some shocking takes here boys
When you buy Harry Kane for that much money at his age you can't have a season without trophies which is highly possible so it's absolutely not 100% a great signing
I’m sorry but it just always seems like Dougie is arguing for a different prompt than everyone else. Makes for a very frustrating watch, in what feels like every time he’s on the screen.
HEATED: My bowel movements after my chicken vindaloo last night.
The best transfer for me is Grimaldo on a free transfer.
dougie and mikeys lists are shocking
“Without a major title” brother Joe Man U might not even play in Europe next season at all and is below Chelsea let’s not forget..
Dougie makes the most ridiculous over the top comments and then moans when he gets clipped. Like when he said that Brighton can win Serie A. There's no way he just called Thuram being up there with Pogba and Pirlo after one season. Is he even better than Cambiasso as a free agent or Klose?
Tbg Bellingham has been a bit milder on the second half of the season
Talk about English bias 😅 Dougie has the only sensible list here
League Cup is major trophy Joe always has been but whatever you say
I get so bored of talking about how much a player was bought for. It makes no difference whether that player should perform at a high level or not. Its not the player's fault that one club values a player 100 mil and another club pays that. We seem to throw all logical thinking out the window immediately if they are expensive. The money paid for a player has ZERO impact on how that player should perform. We expect a player like mudryk to come in from the Ukrainian league and hit the ground running in the prem just because he was expensive. Instead of actually looking at a player who cost a lot but saying well, he is actually only 20,21 years old playing in a country hes not used to at a level hes not used to? The money should never come into consideration when talking about how good players are.
I remember you all saying Bellingham was the least talented of him musiala and Pedri lol
Do you film in Sky Central?
Yes Sir!
(Dougie)
Dougie try’s way too hard to be a hipster lol. Rice not on the list is mad
I'm going to be an insufferable football hipster for an hour and there's none of your sound logic is going to change my mind.....
look at how many goals and assist rodrygo and vini have compared to bellingham ?? what you guys even saying
Dougie focused too much on the fee
Duggie makes this so hard to watch man
a rare complete miss from McCubs
Gyorkares is the next Darwin. Plays with his head down and only uses power to beat the keeper. “Chaotic” on the ball too, like a wind back car with one stuck wheel.
The only thing worse than his projected ability is when he performs crap in England there will “expected” excuses, “so much more than goals”.
In what World is Bellingham is No.1
Every point Mikey makes takes a minimum 3-4 minutes, dunno how yous let him ramble for so long every video
He does stutter a lot.
jude at 8 should be consider a crime
Dougie 😂
so according to Dougie's logic: you shouldn't really be praised for free transfer because they aren't risky. also according to him: If you spend 100 mil on worldbreakers like Rice, Kane or Jude, these signings can't be best of the year cause why are you paying the market value for extremely good players?!? (cringe) I guess good signings are when you buy nonames from mid table teams for around 30 mil and they play slightly above expectations. thank God Joe and Michael where here to save the vid
transfer fee is a hughe factor, to say otherwise you can just have a list of the best players and not consider money spent. money spent is the number one correlation of success in football. paying 100m for a player is insane and you should expect amazing thngs. Rice, Kane and Bellinham have maybe performed above expectations, but not in terms of transfer fee in my opinion.
He’s useless
Of course you should take the fee into consideration. my problem is that aparently you can't be signing of the season if the club paid 100 mil for you. or at least top 3. I'd still put grimaldo as no1, but damn the standard is high for jude. he went for exactly the price that any club would've bought him for. and while last summer it seemed exagerated to pay 100 mil, the dude won la liga almost by himself with all the goals in the first half of the season. Dougie mentioned the risk factor involved in his rating and then he goes and puts the safest transfer of the window on no1
Partey showed Rice up in one game. Rice literally has nothing to do in that Arsenal side. His passing is average, he plays like a rugby player
Dougie you’re clueless
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Rice is the reason arsenal got knocked out of the CL and mccubbin has him in 4th, shocking
How is he the reason
@@seemyskill5543 Did you watch the legs against Bayern? The guy was shambolic. Directly responsible for 3 goals conceded, he doesn't have a progressive pass in his body. He's just an expensive Gareth Barry
Yuh
Dougie's approach to this was terrible
You desperately try to force in some great value for money signinings in there and you argue with complete bogus like risk taken. We already know the outcome of risks taken for every signing. Why do you make episode about best signings when you have need to show in some players that are just plain worse than others you overlook? Just make episode about best budget signings or something. Lately you just make episodes when you desperately try to show off your knowledge and nonsensical criteria while making choices.
Great day watching spurs fans go into melt down 😂😂😂😂😂 cry more
Jesus, Declan Rice is getting so so so so overrated
First
Dougies list is terrible
Didn't realise this video was 'the best value for money'
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Joe what did you ask the barber when you got an haircut. I want this exact same haircut but don’t know how to explain it. Please I beg of you let me know
Think it's called a really short mullet. Probs be easier for your barber if u just take a screenshot