Hi all, thanks for watching! The full lecture series of Hard-Boiled synthesis can be found here: th-cam.com/play/PLMDcoG6cxhI0JRfmuv3AwT9Sy0FQNMqCL.html
hi, can't thank u enough for such a great series of lectures. I was trying to learn meta analysis for a long time, but all I got was theory theory and theory. This is the first time I really feel like," I Can Do It". Thanks a million.
Thanks a million Prof. for explaining "stat tings" in a comprehendible way. You have done a great job. Kindly deliver lectures on stats for ecologists.
I am working on a meta-analysis and around half of my studies don't present any variance metric, especially the old ones, that is why I was thinking of using the log ratio. Also, considering that I am comparing outcomes from a very specific experiment, so I don't have data from regressions. Do you think in this case is appropriate to use log ratio? I don't want to lose all that data. Thanks
You should try the best you can to extract variances, there are many acrobatics to get these, in google, search for effect size conversions, and there are many resources available. Also, you will need the variances even for the log response ratio, since it is used to estimate its variance -- which are essential for meta-analysis (e.g., act as weights)
Hi all, thanks for watching!
The full lecture series of Hard-Boiled synthesis can be found here:
th-cam.com/play/PLMDcoG6cxhI0JRfmuv3AwT9Sy0FQNMqCL.html
Have watched all the series and am so grateful to you, am in the field of medicine but the same applies to all fields.
hi, can't thank u enough for such a great series of lectures. I was trying to learn meta analysis for a long time, but all I got was theory theory and theory. This is the first time I really feel like," I Can Do It". Thanks a million.
Thanks! And you can do it! :-)
Thanks a million Prof. for explaining "stat tings" in a comprehendible way. You have done a great job. Kindly deliver lectures on stats for ecologists.
this is so great!
Thanks! Pen & paper does the trick!
I am working on a meta-analysis and around half of my studies don't present any variance metric, especially the old ones, that is why I was thinking of using the log ratio. Also, considering that I am comparing outcomes from a very specific experiment, so I don't have data from regressions. Do you think in this case is appropriate to use log ratio? I don't want to lose all that data. Thanks
You should try the best you can to extract variances, there are many acrobatics to get these, in google, search for effect size conversions, and there are many resources available. Also, you will need the variances even for the log response ratio, since it is used to estimate its variance -- which are essential for meta-analysis (e.g., act as weights)
Keep going sir you are doing great work ♥️
I will try my best