@@panfarmld9664 imagine how many years that would take for that to happen that you need this kind of specs just to run twitter (if twitter is still alive during that time)
@@taoretakitsune i have a 2000 euros PC and i built a 2500 euros for my friend. Both are basically superior respect the one in the video. Who use DDR4 in 2023? Seems you need to return to school
@@RealNotallGaming bro what are you smoking? The msrp on the threadripper, mobo, and the gpu are that entire budget. Sure you can go second hand but that doesn’t mean it’s a normal 3000 build. Also plenty of people use ddr4 in 2023. You don’t need the latest. That’s why plenty of people still use the 1060.
RTX A4000 with a threadripper and decked out with noctua fans... that thing is more expensive than my rent for a year. Every part except the windows 11 pro is an extimate of 10,428 american dollars, 1,418,927.53 Japanese yen.
@@T33K3SS3LCH3N but more expensive than the 3070 which it's a bit slower than. Prices went back up recently, a few months ago you could get them used for around $400, now they are more like $7-900
@@xythiera7255if you’re using it for gaming, yeah. If you’re using it for workstation uses, like scientific computation, serious rendering, Linux workloads, things like that, it blows a 4090 out of the water. That monstrosity is not a gaming PC by any means, that is a ‘I spent over $10,000 on this beast, and made my money back in six months,’ MOCHEEN.
@@pepperpig649 VRAM doesn't have that much important when doing some pro work, in that case only computational power matters. That is why AMD is loosing to NVIDIA for professional work even though they provide more VRAM.
@pepperpig649 Workstation work is a different ball game. As such, things are rendering, and calculations are needed more than gaming card. The Gaming card dosnt need to figured things out for the first time or run simulations usually with raw data. Gaming mostly has that figured out by the devs and code, it just needs to follow instructions basicly. There is also other features like data correction and error identification built in. something that'll help keep accurate data flowing and prevent failure the final work project. So as to not lose work or time. Gaming not so much if there is an error not as much insurance and just redo. It's pretty much just built different and optimised different
@@xEndkoNxYeah did some AI stuff with my 2080 Ti and I instantly filled 10 GB of VRAM. GPU was not utilised that much but VRAM goes vraaam. It's also why people are modding old Nvidia and AMD cards with more VRAM like the 2080 Ti with 22 or 44 GB.
Based on them listing the Native Instruments Komplete Audio 1 interface, it's likely that the computer is used for music production. Which would explain the amount of RAM (and hence, why Threadripper was chosen, since you can't use more than 128 GB DDR4 RAM with consumer CPUs) as well as the Optane drive (for additional speed, to supplement the RAM). No idea how the RTX A4000 fits into the picture though.
@@sjorahx5651 Yeah, I'd say it's probably there for either some rendering work or to help with some machine learning or other applications that are calculation intensive
@@sjorahx5651 yeah A400 maybe for blender? but its shit compared to a 4090. but this pc even tho it is expensive is one of the shittiest combos ive seen for a streamer. way overpriced for the wrong components. an I9 14900k and a 4090 would blow this out of the water for 1/4 of the price
When I browse twitter and do a little gaming, I love to use top of the line workstation bruteforce parts. It makes my twitter feed uhhh a lot smoother I guess
Botan: "CPU Threadripper Pro 5995WX. This is actually a CPU that costs about 1.1 million Yen" What the specs actually show: Threadripper Pro 5955WX The "5995WX" has 64 Zen3 cores, and is the most powerful Workstation CPU in existence, with OEMs paying $6500 (before markup) originally, though it's probably a lot less now. The "5955WX" has 16 Zen3 cores and can be found for about $1100 retail. CPU performance is about the same as a Ryzen R9 5950X desktop CPU, which costs about $500, but the 5955WX has far more I/O. It's an easy mistake to make. I would prefer it if the numbering system included the number of cores instead, but there it is.
Funny thing is that gaming rigs barely need any CPU power anyway. I upgraded from a 3060Ti to a 4090 (the current top GPU by a wide margin) for Cyberpunk Overdrive... and was still GPU-bottlenecked at 1440p, while using a mere i5-11600K (a middle class processor from 2 generations ago). GPU at 100% load, CPU at 80%. You may think that Cyberpunk is just an extreme case, but this pattern actually held up with games like TW:WH3 and Satisfactory. The demands on graphics card has increased tremendously over the years, while the processor load hasn't changed much at all. High end processors are only useful for special types of productivity software. I did switch to an i5-13600KF afterwards (the current gen "middle class" model), but even that felt more like a vanity upgrade without much serious reason behind it.
Glad you caught this too. I was confused when I read Botan claiming it was a 1.1M yen processor. Also the guy using an Optane SSD is a bit strange as that processor came out around the time Intel stopped producing them... Anyway, this system was definitely built for Enterprise use... Most likely CAD, 3D rendering, video editing, or something that really needs a lot of cores and a beefy video card.
@@T33K3SS3LCH3N CPU load doesn't really mean anything when determining bottlenecks (unless it's at 100%), a game has to be hyper specialized to be able to get a modern 8< core cpu to 100% load. If you look at any decent reviews for cpus you'll see there is indeed a huge difference between them when they show the comparison charts, it's just less of a difference than the steps in gpus (about 100fps difference between bottom and top with the same gpu in the same games @1440p, bottom is still above 100fps).
It's just as easy to write the specs wrong, 5955 vs 5995. Considering the price of the SSD I really do think it's the 5995, but guess we gotta ask the owner to be sure.
The viewer was obviously joking when he said his system was for gaming, OR he was referring to the fact that his monitor is "bought" for gaming rather than production purposes. He has a full production build, he could be doing anything from video rendering, 3d rendering, music production, AI, rent it out as a workstation...
They might have thought "more cost = better" which isn't always true. Or, what I actually think, is that they didn't list everything the PC needs to do. Mainly because it's all top of the line workstation parts, built for function, reliability and compatibility. I mean the case even has those little wheels under it. I bet they do some kind of AI stuff, rendering, research, or something like that for a job.
@@ckmishn3664 Why the fuck get a 16 core Threadripper. According to those specs, you ain't even using half of the PCI lanes so might as well get the consumer grade 16 core from AMD and it's not gonna be any different
The problem is the pc spec she shows is that for half the price for everything she is buying, she would get much better performance out of it for example: AMD Ryzen 7800x3D for gaming would be a big jump in performance (20%+) comparing to threadripper because almost every games still not multicore optimized (atleast no significant margin gain after 8 cores 16 thread) or RTX 4090 for the same price and she will get almost 50% performance gain, and we arent talking abount mini fps and stability gain from ddr 5 ram
That is likely an artist or developers PC, rendering or production/editing gpu/cpu and it listed an audio interface used for recording music. Would be interesting to know what they make or work on because those are some amazing parts.
Systems like this are built for network admins running multiple virtual PC's, heavy encoding, or cpu intensive work. Note how tiny the graphics card is. This is not a gaming pc. It is a workstation.
I was wondering about that the moment I saw the price tag. These days, it's a fairly safe bet that anybody's $10,000 PC is for playing around with or seriously developing neural nets, because you only need a fraction of that for basically everything else and if it's not sensitive, like an AI is rather inherently, you can just rent servers to deal with it.
seems like it is used for computational stuff that is reliant on cpu and ram. For example in minecraft to be able to render a lot of chunks at the same time it is more reliant on ram size&speed and cpu power rather than graphical power.
What i find funny is that she says a 5995WX which is the 64-core chip (which is actually only about $7,400 USD now, or about $8,250 back in May) but on the spec sheet it has the 5955WX listed which is the 16-core chip which is only $1,100, which is why it has 16 in the parenthesis. The rest of the computer is equally interesting, although in particular the SSDs are very, very different from consumer-grade stuff. To put speed of the optane drive in some context, the 970 EVO plus, which is one of the best Gen 3 NVME SSDs, is about 20% slower in game load times, half as fast in tom's hardware 50GB transfer rate test, 6 times slower in PCMark 10, and in synthetic testing, it's about 3 times as slower than the optane drive in Crystaldiskmark with a queue depth of 1. if none of that was helpful, the optane drive is able to maintain a write speed of 6 gigabytes per second for 15 minutes (which is how long tom's hardware benchmark ran for) while the 970 EVO plus started out at 3 Gigabytes per second, but after ~25 seconds it dropped to about 1.5 Gigabytes per second for the remainder of the test.
This isn't really a gaming rig. Its more of a workstation to do CAD stuff. That's why its got a ThreadRipper and an A4000. Its also why none of the part have that obnoxious RGB stuff. They're doing stuff in AutoCAD. the gaming performance from a cost/performance ratio is terrible, but that's not really the point of this kind of rig.
I feel like when you see someone with a plain looking PC it's either going to be a $300~$400 toaster or an enterprise level $10,000+ workstation loaded to the gills. There is no in-between.
I think they have the wrong fan ratio. More intake than exhaust so that there's positive air pressure in the case. Otherwise you get dust sucked in through every gap.
The pc is most definitely used for rendering, editing and probably server hosting. All of the components are heavy duty stuff meant for specific purposes
That is actually a 5955WX; not the more expensive one. Actually it's the cheapest of the threadrippers, used when you want only more PCIe lanes (but not more cores).
I like how the comments here are full of discussion about the pc spec in this vid and have suggestion on what could be better or not. Kinda amusing just read through all of those infos
for Threadrippers the pins are in the motherboard's socket same as Intel's, just a fun-fact as I would have a stroke if I were to damage one of those expensive motherboards anyway
Botan not only knows these seem to be industry/professional rather than gaming components, but describes each one. I wonder if she already knew or decided to do her homework. Either way, kudos.
It’s hard to notice until you take a good look but that case is also massive. Could probably fit two ATX boards in there side by size. I think the scaling is what makes it look unimpressive at first but the A4000 is also a single slot GPU so it doesn’t dwarf everything like a 4090
My dad works for a government agency and he's given a benefit stipend to procure a laptop for work. I told him jokingly that he should get an ROG Strix Scar 18. Lo and behold he got it for free from his office. And he uses it for Zoom, WhatsApp Desktop and Chrome. Meanwhile I look at him with envy while using my MSI GF63 lol.
With high capacities you usually lose tons of stability with each increase in speed, which is why sometimes you even have to downclock to upgrade capacity. In that regard, 3200 MHz at CL22 (Crucial server RAM specs, which I assume he's using) is reasonably fast.
I'll be the first to admit that I fully stand behind Optane boot drives. I bought a 1tb boot drive for about 400 bucks and it really is smooth, however none of those other part are any good outside of AI, rendering, maybe CAD, etc. It doesn't even game or do general productivity as well as a 3000 dollar consumer system with a 4090 and 8-16 cores lol.
That's a pretty swanky workstation. These prices of course are pretty standard in the server space, and if you need to spend even more money, there's always a bigger Epyc available.
im a bit perplexed by the fact that he uses this for gaming and twitter... probably better value in the normal gaming GPUs if you don't actually need a workstation card lmao
My man built a whole industrial workstation and said it was for gaming and twitter
Same case for those who bought high-end phones just to update their Insta/Tik Tok and nothing else.
100tabs of twitters and 10 ffxiv on the background.
@@Gegarace gotta pay big money to AFK in Limsa
"humble brag"
My man be gaming while rendering for that Dune : Part Two battle scene
"I need a computer for some small things like twitter."
Prebuild team: I got you fam.
Man forgot to mention that he just wants to open Twitter, not run Twitter
"A computer for some small things like twitter."
Now i'm scared~~
@@panfarmld9664 imagine how many years that would take for that to happen that you need this kind of specs just to run twitter (if twitter is still alive during that time)
Plot Twist: That PC is not for using twitter. It's for running Twitter.
its just a normal 3000 dollars PC .... 🤷😂
@@RealNotallGaming >3k usd pc
this boy knows nothing about pcs
@@taoretakitsune i have a 2000 euros PC and i built a 2500 euros for my friend. Both are basically superior respect the one in the video.
Who use DDR4 in 2023?
Seems you need to return to school
@@RealNotallGaming bro what are you smoking? The msrp on the threadripper, mobo, and the gpu are that entire budget. Sure you can go second hand but that doesn’t mean it’s a normal 3000 build. Also plenty of people use ddr4 in 2023. You don’t need the latest. That’s why plenty of people still use the 1060.
@@Handleoriginal12 the CPU, new is 1300 USD and the GPU (that is for data center not gaming....) Is like 900 USD
....
Its a normal fuckin PC 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Botan sure knows her stuff.
the owner of this PC: it doesn't have to be fancy looking
it just has to be powerful
The pc is so built I think he can use it to predict the future wth
RTX A4000 with a threadripper and decked out with noctua fans... that thing is more expensive than my rent for a year.
Every part except the windows 11 pro is an extimate of 10,428 american dollars, 1,418,927.53 Japanese yen.
Win 11 Pro is about 5 dollars. So 10,433 dollars.
Funny thing: The A4000 is currently actually much cheaper than an RTX4090
@@T33K3SS3LCH3N but more expensive than the 3070 which it's a bit slower than. Prices went back up recently, a few months ago you could get them used for around $400, now they are more like $7-900
@@T33K3SS3LCH3N But its always way way worse then a 4090
@@xythiera7255if you’re using it for gaming, yeah. If you’re using it for workstation uses, like scientific computation, serious rendering, Linux workloads, things like that, it blows a 4090 out of the water. That monstrosity is not a gaming PC by any means, that is a ‘I spent over $10,000 on this beast, and made my money back in six months,’ MOCHEEN.
Probably 3D VFX Artist or something (with that CPU and GPU combination).
Or probably that PC is used for animation studio like Ufotable or Madhouse.
Not really with that amount of money why not get a rtx 3090 instead with more vram?
@@pepperpig649 the rtx don't have some compatibilities for software like IA training or machine learning.
@@pepperpig649 VRAM doesn't have that much important when doing some pro work, in that case only computational power matters. That is why AMD is loosing to NVIDIA for professional work even though they provide more VRAM.
@pepperpig649 Workstation work is a different ball game. As such, things are rendering, and calculations are needed more than gaming card.
The Gaming card dosnt need to figured things out for the first time or run simulations usually with raw data. Gaming mostly has that figured out by the devs and code, it just needs to follow instructions basicly.
There is also other features like data correction and error identification built in. something that'll help keep accurate data flowing and prevent failure the final work project. So as to not lose work or time.
Gaming not so much if there is an error not as much insurance and just redo.
It's pretty much just built different and optimised different
@@xEndkoNxYeah did some AI stuff with my 2080 Ti and I instantly filled 10 GB of VRAM. GPU was not utilised that much but VRAM goes vraaam. It's also why people are modding old Nvidia and AMD cards with more VRAM like the 2080 Ti with 22 or 44 GB.
Based on them listing the Native Instruments Komplete Audio 1 interface, it's likely that the computer is used for music production. Which would explain the amount of RAM (and hence, why Threadripper was chosen, since you can't use more than 128 GB DDR4 RAM with consumer CPUs) as well as the Optane drive (for additional speed, to supplement the RAM). No idea how the RTX A4000 fits into the picture though.
the RTX is there for the gaming part... nothing more nothing less... ohh and probably for the twitter part too
@@justsomehaatonpassingby4488 Dude nobody buys an A4000 for gaming. RTX just means it is capable of ray tracing.
@@sjorahx5651 Yeah, I'd say it's probably there for either some rendering work or to help with some machine learning or other applications that are calculation intensive
@@sjorahx5651 yeah A400 maybe for blender? but its shit compared to a 4090. but this pc even tho it is expensive is one of the shittiest combos ive seen for a streamer. way overpriced for the wrong components. an I9 14900k and a 4090 would blow this out of the water for 1/4 of the price
but it comes down to gaming? or Workstation like development
When I browse twitter and do a little gaming, I love to use top of the line workstation bruteforce parts. It makes my twitter feed uhhh a lot smoother I guess
Botan: "CPU Threadripper Pro 5995WX. This is actually a CPU that costs about 1.1 million Yen"
What the specs actually show: Threadripper Pro 5955WX
The "5995WX" has 64 Zen3 cores, and is the most powerful Workstation CPU in existence, with OEMs paying $6500 (before markup) originally, though it's probably a lot less now.
The "5955WX" has 16 Zen3 cores and can be found for about $1100 retail. CPU performance is about the same as a Ryzen R9 5950X desktop CPU, which costs about $500, but the 5955WX has far more I/O.
It's an easy mistake to make. I would prefer it if the numbering system included the number of cores instead, but there it is.
Funny thing is that gaming rigs barely need any CPU power anyway.
I upgraded from a 3060Ti to a 4090 (the current top GPU by a wide margin) for Cyberpunk Overdrive... and was still GPU-bottlenecked at 1440p, while using a mere i5-11600K (a middle class processor from 2 generations ago). GPU at 100% load, CPU at 80%.
You may think that Cyberpunk is just an extreme case, but this pattern actually held up with games like TW:WH3 and Satisfactory. The demands on graphics card has increased tremendously over the years, while the processor load hasn't changed much at all. High end processors are only useful for special types of productivity software.
I did switch to an i5-13600KF afterwards (the current gen "middle class" model), but even that felt more like a vanity upgrade without much serious reason behind it.
Glad you caught this too. I was confused when I read Botan claiming it was a 1.1M yen processor. Also the guy using an Optane SSD is a bit strange as that processor came out around the time Intel stopped producing them... Anyway, this system was definitely built for Enterprise use... Most likely CAD, 3D rendering, video editing, or something that really needs a lot of cores and a beefy video card.
@@T33K3SS3LCH3N CPU load doesn't really mean anything when determining bottlenecks (unless it's at 100%), a game has to be hyper specialized to be able to get a modern 8< core cpu to 100% load. If you look at any decent reviews for cpus you'll see there is indeed a huge difference between them when they show the comparison charts, it's just less of a difference than the steps in gpus (about 100fps difference between bottom and top with the same gpu in the same games @1440p, bottom is still above 100fps).
@@BilboSwagginsTheThird Hell, the fancier cpus can sometimes do worse than oldest ones if the games aren’t optimized correctly to utilize the cores
It's just as easy to write the specs wrong, 5955 vs 5995. Considering the price of the SSD I really do think it's the 5995, but guess we gotta ask the owner to be sure.
The viewer was obviously joking when he said his system was for gaming, OR he was referring to the fact that his monitor is "bought" for gaming rather than production purposes.
He has a full production build, he could be doing anything from video rendering, 3d rendering, music production, AI, rent it out as a workstation...
My man either got scammed or just a mad lad
I think it's the latter!
Nah, that's definitely a work machine. Maybe an animator or someone who works with professional video and audio.
Probably both
That would be a great Blender render rig.
Dude is running our simulation on that PC.
They might have thought "more cost = better" which isn't always true.
Or, what I actually think, is that they didn't list everything the PC needs to do. Mainly because it's all top of the line workstation parts, built for function, reliability and compatibility. I mean the case even has those little wheels under it. I bet they do some kind of AI stuff, rendering, research, or something like that for a job.
Actually she's mistaken on what CPU the guy has. It's listed as "5955WX", which has 16 cores, but she read it as "5995WX", which has 64 cores.
@@ckmishn3664 Why the fuck get a 16 core Threadripper. According to those specs, you ain't even using half of the PCI lanes so might as well get the consumer grade 16 core from AMD and it's not gonna be any different
Yeah, the most expensive CPU isn't actually great for most games
But man, still wild to see something renders that fast
The problem is the pc spec she shows is that for half the price for everything she is buying, she would get much better performance out of it
for example: AMD Ryzen 7800x3D for gaming would be a big jump in performance (20%+) comparing to threadripper because almost every games still not multicore optimized (atleast no significant margin gain after 8 cores 16 thread) or RTX 4090 for the same price and she will get almost 50% performance gain, and we arent talking abount mini fps and stability gain from ddr 5 ram
@@crazypeanatz I don't think whoever owns it built it for gaming. That's clearly a workstation.
The 5955wx "only" costs around $1k-$1,5k, i think botan mistook it for a 5995wx
I think it's more likely Botan mistyped it as a 5955 instead of 5995.
@@kebb0 no, a 5995 is 64 core while that CPU includes that fact that it's 16 core. at least I assume that's what (16 koa) means
in japanese she says 5995 so it's wrong in the english text
so you didnt consider translator mistake by mistyping number
WHO THE FUCK WAS NAMING THESE THINGS
That monster can run multiple AI locally at once
That is likely an artist or developers PC, rendering or production/editing gpu/cpu and it listed an audio interface used for recording music. Would be interesting to know what they make or work on because those are some amazing parts.
I would think either major game studio or animation studio employee
It would be a good compiler machine.
The first thing that popped to my mind was.... C++ or Rust?
@@pohjoisenvanhus I mean, they're both LLVM.
Systems like this are built for network admins running multiple virtual PC's, heavy encoding, or cpu intensive work. Note how tiny the graphics card is. This is not a gaming pc. It is a workstation.
didnt know botan was a techie like, i love her more now 😭
All that computing power, but doesn't even buy 140's
Person: I use this for Mi-
Autocorrect: Minecraft
Person: Mine Sweeper
You don't get it, it's so he can run twitter even when X servers are down.
This looks like what I imagined a dedicated AI developer (especially LLMs) pc looks like with all those setups
I was wondering about that the moment I saw the price tag. These days, it's a fairly safe bet that anybody's $10,000 PC is for playing around with or seriously developing neural nets, because you only need a fraction of that for basically everything else and if it's not sensitive, like an AI is rather inherently, you can just rent servers to deal with it.
@Crowe Engineering and simulation PCs for CAD and analysis are pretty beefy like that.
seems like it is used for computational stuff that is reliant on cpu and ram. For example in minecraft to be able to render a lot of chunks at the same time it is more reliant on ram size&speed and cpu power rather than graphical power.
Those SSDs are no joke either. Those are all workstation/server grade SSDs.
Bro can run the whole twitter…
What i find funny is that she says a 5995WX which is the 64-core chip (which is actually only about $7,400 USD now, or about $8,250 back in May)
but on the spec sheet it has the 5955WX listed which is the 16-core chip which is only $1,100, which is why it has 16 in the parenthesis.
The rest of the computer is equally interesting, although in particular the SSDs are very, very different from consumer-grade stuff.
To put speed of the optane drive in some context, the 970 EVO plus, which is one of the best Gen 3 NVME SSDs, is about 20% slower in game load times, half as fast in tom's hardware 50GB transfer rate test, 6 times slower in PCMark 10, and in synthetic testing, it's about 3 times as slower than the optane drive in Crystaldiskmark with a queue depth of 1.
if none of that was helpful, the optane drive is able to maintain a write speed of 6 gigabytes per second for 15 minutes (which is how long tom's hardware benchmark ran for)
while the 970 EVO plus started out at 3 Gigabytes per second, but after ~25 seconds it dropped to about 1.5 Gigabytes per second for the remainder of the test.
I can tell that this person is a big fan of Noctua. No pun intended.
Oh, it's rare for Botan to pon and think it's the $7000 5995wx, when the specs show the $1300 5955wx. XD
Miko's machine was right after all.
Dudes pc can see the future
Dude forgot to plug in the optical drive.
ah yes
That PC once Polka said " *B E E F P C* "
This isn't really a gaming rig. Its more of a workstation to do CAD stuff. That's why its got a ThreadRipper and an A4000. Its also why none of the part have that obnoxious RGB stuff. They're doing stuff in AutoCAD. the gaming performance from a cost/performance ratio is terrible, but that's not really the point of this kind of rig.
That's why RGB enthusiats are just don't understand the beauty of non-shiny but loaded with highend gears PC.
The PC Store: "building a server station are we?"
The Dude: "nah just some gaming and twitter"
that's a server type sytem unit like his using A4000 gpu
An absolute rendering work beast
I feel like when you see someone with a plain looking PC it's either going to be a $300~$400 toaster or an enterprise level $10,000+ workstation loaded to the gills.
There is no in-between.
Wtf it's not a gaming pc it's a full on workstation for multithreaded and vram intensive applications, does that helps in vtubing in some way?
There is no way he is running a Threadripper air cooled with this tiny ass slim cooler!
I think they have the wrong fan ratio. More intake than exhaust so that there's positive air pressure in the case. Otherwise you get dust sucked in through every gap.
Yeah, genuinely confuse how air intake and out take work
This monster has 7 freaking fans.
The pc is most definitely used for rendering, editing and probably server hosting. All of the components are heavy duty stuff meant for specific purposes
That is actually a 5955WX; not the more expensive one. Actually it's the cheapest of the threadrippers, used when you want only more PCIe lanes (but not more cores).
How many fans do you want
Shishiro: Yes
It's not her pc
this person : i want a pc that let me browse twitter faster than my father left me
Bro's pc can show tweets before before they're sent
*Sees title "$10000 CPU"
Me: ....... Threadripper *clicks
I like how the comments here are full of discussion about the pc spec in this vid and have suggestion on what could be better or not. Kinda amusing just read through all of those infos
I think I would literally have a stroke and die if I ever got a CPU like that, and damaged either a pin or static shock it to render it useless.
for Threadrippers the pins are in the motherboard's socket same as Intel's, just a fun-fact as I would have a stroke if I were to damage one of those expensive motherboards anyway
My little gal has just turned 7 this year because I made it when the 1060 came out and it still runs everything just fine.
That CPU Fan is mounted the wrong way.... Literally blocked by the PCI card... Spends so much money but has no clue what he;s doing.
分かる人には、MB見た瞬間にヤバいPCなのは伝わる。
Now THIS is a pc that can run Minecraft at 60 fps
He might not even need to download any more RAM.
the GPU is meant for commercial. SO this person must be some kind of developer
Bro is owning a whole damn data center with that thing 😭
Homies got a threadripper but has it aircooled. Based honestly
Threadrippers are huge, so you don't need as big of a cooler as you'd expect
Botan not only knows these seem to be industry/professional rather than gaming components, but describes each one. I wonder if she already knew or decided to do her homework. Either way, kudos.
Ah, so that's the sort of PC Jari used to write Time II...
Bro, if i had a CPU that cost $10,000, it better tell me the god damn future. 💀
It’s hard to notice until you take a good look but that case is also massive. Could probably fit two ATX boards in there side by size. I think the scaling is what makes it look unimpressive at first but the A4000 is also a single slot GPU so it doesn’t dwarf everything like a 4090
I tnink she just throw in the box all most expensive components without looking
Beef PC, but disguised as a Poltato PC.
This looks like a rendering/encoding workstation.
Bro got NASA PC, to play kerbal space program
This aint no ordinary pc my god
That cpu cooler is either gonna pull hot air from the gpu or blow hot air onto the gpu
Botan should have like Vesper's PC roasting or something
my dude build a rendering workstation and told people he used it for twitter lmao
I didn't even know there existed 2.5 SSD drive that used Pci Express 4.0 as connection interface, though M.2 was the only way to get PCI Express SSD.
> Has a Threadripper in his PC
> Cannot afford normal 120mm intake fans, setting up 80/90mm instead.
My dad works for a government agency and he's given a benefit stipend to procure a laptop for work. I told him jokingly that he should get an ROG Strix Scar 18. Lo and behold he got it for free from his office. And he uses it for Zoom, WhatsApp Desktop and Chrome.
Meanwhile I look at him with envy while using my MSI GF63 lol.
It's like those billionaires that just wear plain clothes on the steets
thats not a beef PC thats a fking Mammoth.
So... It's a workstation instead of your average PC.
I didn't know Linus also watches JP vtubers
that pc is probably used for back end processing or maybe a server
I hope his workstation is covered with a lid and not glass. Because it looks absolutely tasteless. The cable management is also sloppy.
Ay yo,I thought it was 10,000 yen at first
Now that truly is a gigachad PC
Bro built a nuclear reactor and just uses it for Twitter and games.
b r u v
Imagine using this pc for after effects and premiere.... every project will be fininshed in 15 minutes complete with luts etc...
and... uses 3200mhz RAM.
very nice, i feel like this guy is trolling.
At this kind of work case the speed is not important, it's all about quanitity.
With high capacities you usually lose tons of stability with each increase in speed, which is why sometimes you even have to downclock to upgrade capacity. In that regard, 3200 MHz at CL22 (Crucial server RAM specs, which I assume he's using) is reasonably fast.
This is the spec for CFD or FEA. They are a different world...
I'll be the first to admit that I fully stand behind Optane boot drives. I bought a 1tb boot drive for about 400 bucks and it really is smooth, however none of those other part are any good outside of AI, rendering, maybe CAD, etc. It doesn't even game or do general productivity as well as a 3000 dollar consumer system with a 4090 and 8-16 cores lol.
wow, a workstation just for twitter.
I can't even afford that cooling fan..😂😂😂
that Threadripper is 12k Euro where i live i saw wrong its the 16GB version of the ThreadRipper still cost about 4080ti where i live
scrolling twitter with 256gb ram is wild
Thats a Workstation for CAD, Simulations, or maybe fancy designer.
Im banking on engineer. Man. I want that A4000.
At that point should've just gone for an epyc lmao
looks like render station for 3d apps
i wonder what this guy is doing with that build, a thread ripper and a RTX A400 seems like an overkill for just games.
Probably something along the lines of rendering or music or something since the threadripper and a4000 aren't great for gaming.
When I see "Threadripper".... Dangit 😢
PC definition of sleeper build.
why the hell is a nuctua cooler being pointed at the power supply?
That's a pretty swanky workstation. These prices of course are pretty standard in the server space, and if you need to spend even more money, there's always a bigger Epyc available.
im a bit perplexed by the fact that he uses this for gaming and twitter... probably better value in the normal gaming GPUs if you don't actually need a workstation card lmao