ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024
- The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has used Global SuperTanker Service's Boeing 747-400 for the first time to fight a fire. The SuperTanker is a former Japan Airlines aircraft that's been converted into a retardant-dropping air tanker. Adrienne Moore of CBS station KOVR-TV reports.
Subscribe to the "CBSN" Channel HERE: bit.ly/1Re2MgS
Watch "CBSN" live HERE: cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7
Follow "CBSN" on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/1PO0dkx
Like "CBSN" on Facebook HERE: on. 1o3Deb4
Follow "CBSN" on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1V4qhIu
Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! bit.ly/1OQA29B
---
CBSN is the first digital streaming news network that will allow Internet-connected consumers to watch live, anchored news coverage on their connected TV and other devices. At launch, the network is available 24/7 and makes all of the resources of CBS News available directly on digital platforms with live, anchored coverage 15 hours each weekday. CBSN. Always On.
I see this exact bird taking off over my home at least once a week
$16,000 per hour? How are insurance companies not loving this aircraft? Save a few houses would save millions in claims!
william smith yea true BUT THE LOOOVE when homeowners pay extra for deductible :/
Honestly, 16 an hour is dirt cheap for this thing. It would be less than the cumulative cost of those other planes on multiple trips.
it's totally ineffective...when the wind is blowing 50 + mph they can't fly and you can't stop the fire anyway..it's all a show for politicians to the dumbed down citizenry to make them feel they're being saved. If they built homes out of steel instead of plywood, we'd have no need for Calfire at all. Also the insurance companies benefit from homes burning down because they calculate that risk into their premiums, but when a fire occurs they always declare a state of emergency which liberates state and local funds to cover damages not covered by insurance. Thus the insurance companies can use massive fires to justify high premiums while avoiding paying out settlements knowing the government will pick up the slack.
its not worth it austrailia still burning build bigger liker thunderbird2
@@Sugarsail1 dude, there's so much wrong in your statement AND LOGIC it's astonishing you can breath
We need more of these.
This livery on this 747 Is a beauty
So much BS and red tape around this aircraft if they had 10 of these in service flying 10 hours a day these fires would be put out fast.
nope, the fires would still destroy the place, no amount of aircraft can stop fire when the wind is blowing 60 mph. It's futile. The answer is not suppression or prevention, it's acceptance and preparation. Try building steel frame homes instead of ones out of plywood...that's a start.
@@Sugarsail1 Clearly know nothing about fighting fires, or home construction.
Nex Gamez he is right though. No aircraft can put out huge fires with strong wing
10 at $60K an hour...Hmmm
*Makes sense!*
Um, they contain fire...not put out.
Awesome to see this aircraft being used in California against wildfires right now, August 2020!
Pretty cheap cost, considering that they don't operate on a daily basis.
Considering they still has to maintain it even when they are not using it, to make it always ready they have to do maintenance even when its in ground but still kinda good tho.
Also, with better ability to stop fires, it will save money spent on rebuilding homes, etc...
Karlen Bell they don’t
The Il-76 firefighter is a regular Il-76 transport with two large tubes in the cargo hold. It carries 13.000 gallons of water/retardant. Installing the systems takes an hour and a half. And when it's not needed to fight fires it can go back to normal transport duties "on a daily basis". Talking about cost efficiency.
The one used in Chile (nicknamed there Luchin) is property of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. Not a private corporation looking for profit.
But when they do, they cost a crap load.
17k or 500k+ in damages
Reporter: “have you given it a name”
Guy: “ I call this the worlds largest super soaker”
Deven Looney lots of fun at pool parties
Honest we need more than one. God Bless America.
They don't use the one they have.
Now use an Antanov AN 225.
lol
Damn it, I was thinking of A380 but you beat me by a mile.
It's not about having the biggest plane.
Besides there is literally only one an 225 on earth
use an converted Super Guppy with a pressurized tank.
well in 10 to 20 years they will, that 747 was made in 91 ;þ
It’s doing a great job down here in Lake Elsinore, Corona and on the Holy Fire
They need about ten of those.
Thanks JAL
The cost of flight isn’t what’s expensive, it’s the retardent foam. At a price of $3/gal, this thing drops almost $60,000 in less than 10 seconds, which is why it’s not always used.
'Forest Service refused to allow the tankers to drop on its fires.'
Stealing is illegal because the government doesnt like the competition, even fires.
state and national forests they usually just let burn
They should retrofit all 747 's heading for retirement, like this. The world needs this. Stately ladies,those 747's....
You guna pay for it all??
This should be called “the world biggest fire egstingwisher”
It did last week over Salinas valley they must still be using it for the Dolan fire in big sur
They using 747 to drop that fluid that's insane man . isnt gonna cost you ton ?
They should use this on the Amazon rainforest fire
Lmao and 1-2 months later, Northern California has one of the worst fires in history in Sonoma
The natives knew and still know the best way to handle the fire situation. Watching this is purely for entertainment. This is not even difficult.
California should have atleast have 3 or 5 of these
To be REALLY effective it would need a larger wing, lowering the stall speed and allowing it to fly slower over the fire (which would mean more water dumped on each square foot, effectively drowning the fire completely).
Red Baron oh good, an arm chair expert here.
Too bad they took it out of California service!! It would’ve helped us a lot this last year! We had two fires close to 50,000 acres each in Southern California and that thing would’ve helped a lot!
i wonder if a b 52 could be use as a tanker and i hate to say it it would carry more
Do you guys have a DC-10?
Helicopters can reload in minutes, this giant?
The DC-10 takes 15 minutes. This shouldn't be much different.
Sometimes, when you fight a 30 round AR with a 1000 round LMG, there is a likely chance he 1000 round LMG will win, which means, it can fire 100 rounds without reloading. Whereas the AR can only fire 30, and has to reload every 30 round burst.
This could do 1 run and do more than 20 runs in a helicopter
747 uses pressurized tanks not gravity tanks and should take only 15 minutes.
Not all forest fires are bad that’s why they probably didn’t want it extinguished. Fire is a natural part of the life cycle of the forest and it’s trees. It’s only bad when it gets close to developed areas and structures.
I had to play :12 like multiple times. A genuine mishap.
Texas needs one on standby
When you just saw it in the wallbrige fire ;-;
If this airplane would save lives, property, time, and man power than I say use it.
How many gallons can transport here?
Why would they bother painting it a special livery if they are just testing ir
The Super Tanker has now been gutted out, and sold to another country as a cargo transport. This occurred because of issues with maneuverability, inability to dump its entire load (often returning with too much residual retardant) and turn-around time to reload. SAD.
Somebody can get pretty rich by making a business lease a bunch of these jumbo Jets converted to water tankers and charge people to put up your damn fires
Send this plane to Australia to help fight the bushfires or help the Australia fire department build one similar to this so they can fight the bushfires 19 tons of water sounds good who's the company that build this system? They need to make a few more planeslike this and send them to other countries that had fires in the past in order to help fight forest,bushfires or jungle fire ..
frisco kid help the Australia fire department build a 747 tanker?
frisco kid Australia has to ask for it.
It’s not CalFire’s... It’s owned and operated by a private contractor and is used all over the world.
and bilking taxpayers for leasing it to them to no effect.
This flew over me as I was heading north on 505 today.
Is the plane still based in Colorado or did they move to calf?
Tim Moore the global super tanker aircraft’s home base is in Colorado Springs but it was temporary based in California to hep with the wildfires
Retired now in 2021
16,000 An hour!!! AHHHHHHHH
I think they'd rather use it for the 16000 an hour than replace and rebuild buildings and stuff worth millions.
16k a Time ?
Why not create a fleet of russian BE-200? They can refill in seconds from a nearby lake and they could fly a relay, one after another, stop the fire, before it gets so big.
Dear California Bashers, the FEDERAL Forestry Service has to approve of the use of these planes to fight fires, so don’t blame California if they aren’t used.
They seem like a great idea to me, but I’m not a professional in this area. Here’s one potential problem: 747’s aren’t very maneuverable - especially when flying through smoke close to the ground in hilly areas with crazy air currents. A crash in a populated area would be really, really bad.
Imagine an A380 tanker!
Imagine an a380 tanker that can't takeoff with double decked water tanks.
She flew today
$$$$, how can't 16 thousands dollars, a hour b Justify, when u r talking about Families, homes, live stock. Our Firefighters can only do so much! I would like to C our Military, backing these Firefighters! I still believe. Along the main roads N the Mountains, we need to build fire pumping tanks of some kind. Stations that would have open amount of water, from Large wells. Something, to speed up putting these fires out more quickly. To help fight Fires, N THESE AREARS, IS NOT FAST ENOUGH. NOT PUTTING OUR FIREFIGHTERS down by Know means. We just need to come up with some newer technology
wells atop mtns, in dry country, where it rarely rains??? Esplain again how thats gonna work,,,,
nice i just heard 2 american news agencies report about the same aircraft only with totally different statistics....
should come to the uk and tackle this moor fire
i didnt see how it helped with the woolsey, tubbs or camp fire. all happened after supertanker was invented
There saving lives right now in California, why do governments always think about money over lifes
They should add more big planes, old c130s or globetrotters, the military has plenty in surplus, more planes like this would save so many homes and lives.
I do get that they are insanely expensive. but I feel like in the long run it'd even out between needing to buy these things and needing to pay for a shitload of firefighters on the ground from numerous counties
Rythblaqk they use them. It was a C-130 that crashed in Australia recently.
Isn’t 16000 less than Air Force one, like this really shows our priorities doesn’t it
Plane that drops water vs a flying nuke-resistant command base... which one do you think would be more expensive?? And yeah, the priorities are in line. You have the ENTIRE COUNTRY (minus those who are unable to contribute to society) paying for one plane vs possible a state paying for another plane... it makes sense.
You win for the dumbest comment
It costs $1 million to launch that 747 plane
Do it in the carr fire
"Super Soaker" ! He He He !
Woah
$16,000 per hour? And they are saying that is expensive?????????!? Let's see the cost of a typical home in California running at $600K-2000K, and these houses burning to ground in minutes, and they are keeping this equipment from flying? What planet are these people from? Now that they have a tool to stop fires, they don't want to use it????
im gonna bring this to the next water gun war
No need for this on the Carr fire as it burns historic locations like Lewiston?????????
This is just straight up overkill...
*The American Way!*
Japanese aircraft dropping bombs, water bombs.
Super tanker in Amazonia naw.
Did she just say “Retarted tanker” XD LAMO
"Special needs" tanker ;)
No she said "Retardant-dropping air tanker" smh -_-
there too small aircraft manufactures need to be designing better planes to put out fire fast obviously they have no idea austrailia still burning they need thunderbird2 too put out fires
Its doing great right now in the mountains looking over Lake Elsinore Aug. 2018! God bless you pilots! :)
ITS A REALLY BEAUTIFUL WHITE AND RED JETLINER :) SURE LOVE THE JUMBO JETS FOR GOOD USE
Just use the Boeing 747 Dreamliner bigger
We need to start building homes out of concrete, not twigs!! It’s a way to survive these End Times.
As a taxpayer it's worth it
lmao they are talking about money yet spend all that money on police militarization
Can we stop meddling in other countries military affairs and start spending more money at home ? Can you imagine what would America be like if we spent half of our military budget here at home ??????
Isn’t “retardant” ableism?
Not in this context
Breaking news, plane to busy dropping chemtrails. To help with fire.
This is the world we live in, especially in California where chemtrails are sprayed daily.
Right because they use fire fighting planes to dump aluminum and barium
Talking about Global Warming, Where science can make it Rain! LOL, to stop Fires from getting out of Hand!
Did they say "dont drop the water on the fire" duh! Water plain cant help put out FIRE stupid!. Conspiracy
At even stall speed, no - it would still be flying too fast to be effective with straight water. If there were some way to make the wing larger however and let it fly slower it would stand a better change of dousing it.
It's not alone enough to fight fires....the Russian BE 200 is what California needs right now
Why not let them use it? Is it cheating if you use this? Will it cut so many jobs from firefighters? hmmm...something sounds suspicious
These tankers help create a fire break line but they do not put out fires. The bodies on the ground in harms way are the ones making the difference.
For all of the amount of kids that you don't know any airplane or firefighter and how to measurement of a water tanks and how many you need to be wasting how much had to be with you again and had to be with you again and again and again if you want to listen to it very carefully then be like a come up with your own ideas and do not cheat of anyone else because if you cheat that means you're liar so if you want to design of a different aircraft tank it is your choice like I said so many put a type of aircraft is a prototype to come out because I have to be safety safety safety safety prototype come out testing second safety third and then the fourth one will be approved this new aircraft that's it you don't have to cheat you know you just have to understand
Was that supposed to be a comment or a carnival ride?
GABEOWENS
Its should be used its the B.S .that does not allow it to be used !@ if it saves one life ! .but they will give free money away to illegal immigrants!!
nice money going down the pooper
ya us big money they can make white house into an international zoo too
tool we need my foot
gay
I take it that you are an Airbus fan.
Who u are