MAXED Marines BRUTALLY OP!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 210

  • @semamet
    @semamet 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +404

    The blue emoji is holding my family hostage please help 😢😢😢

    • @HPLovecats
      @HPLovecats 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      blue emoji saved mine

    • @TurtleFish823
      @TurtleFish823 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      🥶

    • @rjjustherefr
      @rjjustherefr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@semamet 😂😂

    • @lefthand4943
      @lefthand4943 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Where does he sell you family asking for a friend

    • @bruhbruh-us6gl
      @bruhbruh-us6gl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@HPLovecatsHe saved my marriage (by holding my wife hostage)

  • @lukas54cz71
    @lukas54cz71 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +224

    Mobilisation laws should really change. Civilian Economy should give huge boost to constructing Civilian industries and infrastructure with railways, while rest of mobilisation laws would make you have higher construction bonus for Millitary factories as usual plus the refineries, dockyards, anti air, etc.
    Edit: thanks for the support. Now let us do petition to Paradox lol

    • @37thgungrunts
      @37thgungrunts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      A civilian economy isn't really directed by the government.

    • @oelholm
      @oelholm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@lukas54cz71 nah not really, a civilian economy is directed more against the people. Instead they should change it so that going up in mobilisation lowers your stability

    • @lukas54cz71
      @lukas54cz71 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@oelholm that would fuck up your country, as low stability gives you event of strikes and France for example suffers that already.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      100%! There needs to be some incentive to not mobilise

    • @oelholm
      @oelholm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lukas54cz71 i mean mobilising your economy SHOULD fuck up your country ngl

  • @knpark2025
    @knpark2025 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +128

    If your government is:
    - not in good terms with its neighbors
    - intervening in foreign conflict just for their own technological gains
    - runs a military entirely made up of marines
    Then that's not the Terran Dominion from Stracraft 2, that's Mexico played by FeedBackGaming.

    • @mikeg2638
      @mikeg2638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      awesome reference

  • @KitzuneHideki
    @KitzuneHideki 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Mexico entered World War II in 1942, but before and during Mexico's entry into the war many migrants were part of the gringo army, so, although their peak activity was in the Pacific with the 201st Squadron "Las Aguilas Aztecas", a large part was in contributions and resources and manpower.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      MORE

    • @FairyRat
      @FairyRat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Las Aguilas Aztecas is one hell of a name. What's that in English? Like Aztec Horses?

    • @PIXTONER2.0_Archive
      @PIXTONER2.0_Archive 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FairyRat "The Aztec Eagles"

    • @KitzuneHideki
      @KitzuneHideki 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@FairyRat it means, Eagles Aztecs, a direct reference to the eagle warrios on the aztec empire, and beacause was squad of planes, their planes was the Republic P-47 if im not wrong

  • @liamflynn1120
    @liamflynn1120 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Mexican high command: *watches another convoy sink beneath the waves*
    Mexican high command: I know what we must do.

  • @kingdrake7889
    @kingdrake7889 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    4:56 Soldiers in spanish is actually 'Soldado' (singular) 'Soldados' (Plural), the term 'Soldaderas' was a term to refer to the women soldiers involved in the Mexican revolution

    • @PatroskiXD
      @PatroskiXD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ehrm Ackshually 👆🤓

    • @Hahasele
      @Hahasele 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@PatroskiXDthat English is bad

    • @PatroskiXD
      @PatroskiXD 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Hahasele I know, but still

    • @MrTeddy12397
      @MrTeddy12397 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hoi4 is woke

    • @threatbear
      @threatbear 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And Soldaderas refers to a person who weld metals

  • @aidenbooksmith2351
    @aidenbooksmith2351 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One of the reasons I really love the low editing of your videos is that it teaches me how to deal with focuses. I really appreciate you for that. You're probably the only one who actively explores the focuses. I wish the others would do so, at least when doing a mod showcase

  • @darkhobo
    @darkhobo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The start of this reminds me of an old MP game my buddy and I played back in the day. I was USSR and he was Germany. And we basiclly focused 100% on the spanish covil war. Gave all our equipment. Had like, 10 volunteer divisions each. Which is nuts in itsself. And yeah we made it last until 1940 when he finally decided it was Barbarossa time and we switched focus back to the actual game. But it was still raging in 1940 becauae we gave so much equipment. Im suprised there were any spanairds left

  • @squiggles5640
    @squiggles5640 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    i always made fun of the "railways but no trains" thing but i just realized that it means that you don't have any domestic designs for trains and would need to buy or lisence them...

  • @kaiserwilhelm1938
    @kaiserwilhelm1938 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    I can't tell you how many campaigns I have won off the backs of small, fast cav units. Anytime you are fighting the USA or USSR, they do an excellent job grabbing victory points while your main divisions break the enemy.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'm the opposite. Slow and steady wins the race

    • @darkhawkgaming3238
      @darkhawkgaming3238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FeedbackGaming blunt force trama lol

  • @JDothan
    @JDothan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Marines are great, naval XP is so easy if you have a navy

  • @simplymatt6140
    @simplymatt6140 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When you have an army selected, there's a button, 3rd from the left, called Cohesion. Setting your army to Rigid or Balanced cohesion has the best effect when trying to keep the frontline order from spreading out too far. *Won't completely fix the issue* but in my experience, it helps when letting the frontline just go

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've played with it. Loose has too much movement and strict can cause gaps to appear. So 99% of the time I'm using balanced. BTW I've not tested this in agesss

  • @soissantesstuff
    @soissantesstuff 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    blue emoji my beloved

  • @FeHearts
    @FeHearts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Now I am imagining a min-maxed multiplayer Hungary where Admiral Horthy has the best marines the Axis could want.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Hungary with carriers next

    • @acsimark
      @acsimark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hard to get naval xp :D Horthy was a Habsburg moron. Imgine what quality of general could be someone in the navy of the habsburgs? :D no doubt the allied choosed him as he was weak by personality.
      BUT you have to kill him to get the red army focus +5% more manpower so you can increase speical forces, that means comunism and +500 Manpower spirit. So you can make red hussars to spam Horthy Marines :D

  • @YankeeCherokee
    @YankeeCherokee 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love seeeing the process! Helps me feel normal haha.
    Tip for sound proofing: hang bed sheets from the ceiling to eliminate a majority of the echo for cheap!

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've got 2 mattresses behind me

  • @glenmcgillivray4707
    @glenmcgillivray4707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i was gazing at the mountains of Italy and thinking to myself. why isn't he training a crack squad of 8 mountaineers to support his 12 marines, to have terrain supremacy in more places. he literally bought the doctorines for them. he just needs to pull off his horse trick to have an optimised army for most applications. i presume Majors can pay for rangers and desert rats and Paras and snowpatrol but honestly its usually mountains and Rivers that grind armies to a halt. so a mix of the two, with an emphasis on marines for landings is probably ideal.

  • @mrcanadianmoosegaming8052
    @mrcanadianmoosegaming8052 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's weird, that you didn't get a second branch, since its hard coded for other minors to have 2 after Jan 1, 1941 once the military tree is done.

  • @gabrielpereiraalves6069
    @gabrielpereiraalves6069 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    50:57
    Brazilian Veteran: Hey, wait a moment...

  • @NKVD.Officer
    @NKVD.Officer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    MAXED Marines in 1937?

    • @xeanderman6688
      @xeanderman6688 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      MAXED Marine in 1937!

    • @w.d.gaster9745
      @w.d.gaster9745 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      MAXED Marines in 1397?

    • @Pioneer_DE
      @Pioneer_DE 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      MAXED Marines in 1937.

  • @holdensnyder637
    @holdensnyder637 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A spearhead game would be nice to see, with a nation that that has bonuses to building tanks/production capacity to support them so its not total suffering. But once you break the ai, I feel like most people on single player just battle plan anyway.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I could do that. Motorized only?

    • @DuplexWeevil337
      @DuplexWeevil337 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@FeedbackGaming mabey use mech too, like use mech as a tank force instead and moterisdd for infantry?

    • @bruhbruh-us6gl
      @bruhbruh-us6gl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FeedbackGamingAnything-on-Wheels only

    • @acsimark
      @acsimark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DuplexWeevil337 mech is the best as it has decent speed and no terrain speed debuff, has little armor breaktrough , hardness for tactics and piercing , best to support with med max ground attack cas. (problem is supply but you can drop be transport plains.

  • @crazysarge9765
    @crazysarge9765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    help the blue emoji has a gun to my head!

  • @TheSuperappelflap
    @TheSuperappelflap หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think one of the best uses for the energy overcharge vs terran is to get a fast templar archive. If you see a raven push coming you can warp in 1 high templar and boost it, so you can feedback all the ravens with it immediately, and then engage defensively with the colossus instead of them being walking paperweights.

  • @linuxares
    @linuxares 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Hatred for the Danes? Is Dave secretly a Swede?

  • @TheArklyte
    @TheArklyte 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I guess the gameplan for smallest minor nations is still the same - max out research bonuses and special forces division for their faction?

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If it works, it works

  • @Jansay34
    @Jansay34 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like that you're using battleplan for every video but I guess it'd be nice to see micro in a video for a change. Would be a nice opportunity to show some tank designs too

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'll do a micro video next just for you

  • @Maeda-c5t
    @Maeda-c5t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Maybe transforming small divisions into big cavalrys not given equipment is much better.

  • @512TheWolf512
    @512TheWolf512 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    American wrong pronunciation of aluminium is due to print media 150 years ago demanding payment per character printed, therefore aluminium was among the words that were butchered by greed.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Scary if true. CBA to google

    • @lonurad1259
      @lonurad1259 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      from doing research into it a few years ago, I was under the understanding it was because the guy who named it called in aluminium, then for literally no reason whatsoever changed to to aluminum, no one agreed with it so it went back to aluminium again but the US decided not to fix it for reasons I also don't understand. The "per character printed" thing seems to be a bit of a scapegoat these days

    • @nercksrule
      @nercksrule 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lonurad1259
      He originally wanted to call it alumium, but that word wasn't distinct enough from elements like gallium, so he added a couple letters.

  • @Yacovo
    @Yacovo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great decision to sacrifice guns to the naval xp gods. Thanks for the video.

  • @Fioww
    @Fioww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    edit: I'm wrong, read his reply
    edit 2: nevermind that, I was talking about training troops which was actually blocked due to lack of fielded manpower (as it says in the tooltip when he's recruiting, special forces cap doesn't hit the limit yet he can't train any more, also also looking at you, 201 horses in training 👿). small gripe, but yeah
    53:59 Dave knows so much that he knows reading in hoi4 is illegal 🙏 (you couldn't train more marines because the horses hadn't gotten the manpower in them yet)

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's based on the proportion of battalions fielded. It has nothing to do with manpower

    • @Fioww
      @Fioww 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FeedbackGaming my bad! I got confused by this a while ago and thought this was the case but seeing your vid a bit later on after understanding this misunderstanding kinda clears up my confirmation bias from earlier. oops, apologies.

  • @steyn1775
    @steyn1775 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I swear that soon there will be a mod that will convert all soldier units into the blue emoji guy

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      SOON

    • @steyn1775
      @steyn1775 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FeedbackGaming oh no

  • @HeroesNights
    @HeroesNights 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You can also go with political loyalty to boost your stability and make your coastal defense ship the pride of the fleet to help with war support

  • @sjoerdbode45
    @sjoerdbode45 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Instead of getting trains for stability, I buy a few via the new system...if there are sellers ofc.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Expensive BUT viable!

  • @theorixlux
    @theorixlux 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The blue emoji is the last living male white rhino...

  • @Spitze.YT-_-
    @Spitze.YT-_- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    500 base soft attack Mountaineers.
    140 breakthrough and 580 defense plus 96 hard attack and 41 anti air attack.
    11 Mountaineers 2 rocket arty 1 anti tank 1 anti air
    Engineer company
    Rangers
    Field hospital
    Support artillery
    Support rocket artillery
    Maxed superior firepower doctrine right right
    Maxed mountaineer doctrine right right right
    These stats are the stats you would have with everything researched too but it would still be really high without fully researching the tree.
    You also have a super high amount of terrain bonuses and like 45% higher attack on mountains specifically.
    Because of the country bonuses (Bulgaria specifically rn) like military staff and the mountaineer and marine special forces attack buffs I can very easily get over 1000 soft attack often.
    This would be easier to do earlier and would probably work better on japan because of the way bigger industry and army xp you get from the china war.
    Because of the anti tank and anti air hard attack the division can push pretty much any AI tank division and obviously with the soft attack it can push any inf.
    For multiplayer the change so it would be better against tanks would be 11 mountaineers (the same) 4 anti tank 1 rocket arty 1 anti air.
    The soft attack is still really high but the hard attack should make it able to push player made tanks (maybe idk I don't play multiplayer)
    I just wanted to share this cus I thought it was good idk if anyone could use it.
    BTW I said japan specifically cus you would have some time to build up some of these mountaineers while your preparing for war with the allies and they would be really useful in India plus if you switched the mountaineers out with marines you could invade pretty much anywhere with naval supremacy.

  • @acsimark
    @acsimark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Marines are special for supply grace, you want to max it with grand battle plan and air force spec.force grace.
    Expeditionary Task Forces 24 h
    Strategic Air Lift Corps 24 h
    Tip of the Spear 24 h & -10 consuption or planning bonus (or Pocket Defense 48h -20 consuption or manpower)
    Invader 240 h
    Technicaly, you can achive 300h easly which is almost 2 weeks of pure pushing before start to consume.
    Easy push bewteen supply hubs. (Thats the new "out of supply")
    Blowtorch and Corkscrew makes you able to overstack arty on marines without severly fall back on organisation.
    Also as long it is considered a marine divison, the arty extra supply consumption starts after 2 weeks of fighting ;)
    (If you go with rangers the arty dmg is even stronger)
    So go superior fire power, marines+rangers and invader you get 14 days of pushing.
    THATS SUPER MARINE

  • @thejogi95
    @thejogi95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dave, did you though about using rocket artillery for those small templates? I guess the amount of soft attack for small effort you need to take is worth a long way.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      TBH I forget they even exist. For a free support slow its always work it for the extra soft attack

  • @agridley1116
    @agridley1116 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you do loads of separate naval invasion orders like it is a paratroop order, you can plan really fast bc the time doesn’t stack. If there is an issue then pls tell me but if not then you can probably stack it with invader and break the game.

  • @scubandym1941
    @scubandym1941 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video, I thought it was a perfect balance of an exploit video and every single click video.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly! Why not boths?

  • @tasoslotet271
    @tasoslotet271 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    did you check in the market if support equipment was visible?
    make a video of how to exploit the war score to the maximum with the less effort if possible.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It got nerfed by 99.9%. Just not viable anymore

  • @alexchamberlain9317
    @alexchamberlain9317 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your marine divison makes me cry. it's got no bite add more artillery.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The special forces bonuses are proportional based on how much of the division is special forces. My division will get 100% of the special forces bonus. If I add artillery I'll be reducing those bonuses at the cost of extra supply. It's not worth the trade-off. This is the MOST cost effective

    • @alexchamberlain9317
      @alexchamberlain9317 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @DaveFeedBackGaming Fair enough, it looked rough though would adding better support companies like flame tanks etc work better? It just look like you were having a rough time going though italy.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah flame tanks would be a great improvement

  • @zarinth
    @zarinth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most country couldn't make train back then, they had to be imported.

  • @wouterberk6651
    @wouterberk6651 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is a bug with the embargoes. You as Mexico can cancel the embargoes by just clicking end embargo. Mexico is embargoes the USA and the UK😅

  • @dylanchampion9948
    @dylanchampion9948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    did i just see that bittersteel is a patron of yours damn

  • @BlazingCyclone1337
    @BlazingCyclone1337 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    love these micro vids

  • @jan0s
    @jan0s 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thats crazy

  • @Vittorosa
    @Vittorosa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Again that fcin blue guy.. get away, let me enjoy the video

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      BLUE RAGE FUELS HIM MORE

  • @thomasalanine9801
    @thomasalanine9801 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I saw the blue emoji and I HAD to click like and subscribe. Chad

  • @MarioMorela
    @MarioMorela 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hehe fast skill - and Pro playing 🎖️

  • @jeremyglass4283
    @jeremyglass4283 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    who else is pissed that he didnt go to war economy/total mob once he joined the war?

  • @jonidymeti5396
    @jonidymeti5396 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Blue Emoji
    🥶
    Is watching you

  • @maxthetube8466
    @maxthetube8466 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    58:31 *sad bo noises*

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Denmark's first mistake was surrendering

  • @darthteej1
    @darthteej1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    >says skirmisher "probing attack" is useless

  • @earthenergyhex
    @earthenergyhex หลายเดือนก่อน

    Italy and Mexico look the same to me, I am color blind and struggle with the colors throughout this game.

  • @RellMayers
    @RellMayers 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait, is this same exploit for Mexico that was done thousands of times already

  • @darthteej1
    @darthteej1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gee I wish I could gain navy XP as any other nation by losing convoys.

  • @peste1463
    @peste1463 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why did you not train a bunch of 2 width horses and switched them into the chonky horses?

  • @lordedokka
    @lordedokka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The video is very good, it clears my doubts, how do you get the marshal organizer skill? Do I have to use the generals' or marshal's combat plan?

  • @Torantes
    @Torantes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    41:25 wait WHAT?!

  • @Freezefort
    @Freezefort 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    mexican food is just sick with cheese on it.

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Cheese lovers aren't complaining

  • @emiragrbay4857
    @emiragrbay4857 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love the blue emoji 😍

  • @earthenergyhex
    @earthenergyhex หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks!

  • @rahmi.2934
    @rahmi.2934 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    🥶🥶 blue emoji stronkk

  • @mmd2335
    @mmd2335 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i once played a game where Spain literally won the war and Italy lost to eutophia i was like bro wtf😢
    in historical enabled

  • @cmdrme3se3ks43
    @cmdrme3se3ks43 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Blue emoji stole the thumbnail. Can't have shit in hoi 4.

  • @Amalek666
    @Amalek666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not Sure If field Marschall traits affect when used as general + WHy havent you upgraded marines 2 and 3?

  • @sweepy9860
    @sweepy9860 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    nice clickbait you maxed marines in 1938 but the title says 1937😡😡😡

  • @user-os2yp6ph2z
    @user-os2yp6ph2z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    WHY IS THE BLUE EMOJI LOOKING AT ME LIKE THAT

  • @ivanwilly0115
    @ivanwilly0115 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mexican participation in the WW2 Electric booogaloo was more present in the civil sector rather than in the military. Many mexican males when to the US by a program called Programa Bracero. The point of that progam was a control of migration to the US and safeguard the integrity and health of the mexican workers. It wasnt the best, have important flaws, but it was better than the ilegal migration. Thats because the mexican goverment could call the US goverment about abuse and the dangers that workers were exposed to. Those workers usually are called Braceros and they were men who worked in the fields. I'm not that sure if they when to the factories too. The militar participation of Mexico went to the pacific, but quite late in the war. The Mexican Expeditionary Force was only an airwing, all the staff was mexican and they flew in CAS support in the majestic P-47-D30-RA. They performance was excelent and they gain fame because how perfom the CAS mission, with very low altitude and making a lot of strafing. There is a book writted by an mexican officer about them, it was an observer of the war.
    You actually made an almost full historical Mexico in this playthrough. Exile Calles was a move made by the president Cardenas because he knew if Calles still in the mexican politic he never could have real power. Calles already have 4 puppet presidents, or in years from 1924 until 1934 and the period was called Maximato, because he got the motto: Jefe Maximo of Revolution. It was a good move for the progress of Mexico because the caudillos still have a lot of power with their own prived armies. About the Cristiada, it was a move fueled by the fear of catolics and the fear who was Calles. Calles have an anti-church sentiment and some catolics belive that he would ban the church and make it ilegal. But was a rural movement, like the revolution, and the mexican church didnt support this movement, the cristeros have priest and fathers but they were look more like renegades. They got crush because nobody want to help them and even some common folk got scared of them. The last big caudillo, or general, of the cristeros was General Cedillo, who tried to kill president Lazaro Cardenas but fail and got arrested and killed. With the spanish civil war again you hit on the target, Cardenas help the left spanish and send ships for get out refugues, man, women and little timmys. Trosky seek refuge in Memexico because the funny red mustache man wanted out of this live and he was granted to live with Diego Rivera, and muralist, and his wife Frida Calo, some people say Frida cheat Diego with Trosky but that marriege was toxic like a nuclear reactor. Latter was killed by a soviet spy. There wasnt a boliviane alliance but a bonus is a bonus. And lastly with the economy, Cardenas was more red than a blue. Privatiation and capitalism was a no no, he create support for the rural people, who mas a majority in those times, took land of privated plantations for give it to the peasant and give rural schools. What happen next was the peasants didnt knew how manage the land and they didnt want to do it, soo the majority want to sell them but the goverment dindt want to that, but they make enough pression so a reform was made it and now could be sell it and not only inherit it. And the rural schools give education to childrens, that was cool. With the petrol thing was historical. The end.

  • @Domagoj_playz
    @Domagoj_playz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All hail the blue emoji

  • @nicky42742
    @nicky42742 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dave! Dont you get more special forces from Tip of the Spear?

  • @jasonlin4491
    @jasonlin4491 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i thought infantry general in high command could also buff special forces?

  • @bremnersghost948
    @bremnersghost948 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would Amphibious Tanks & Mech make these Mexican Marines even more OP or would that stretch the Mexican Industry & Research too far?

  • @twistedmavfox
    @twistedmavfox 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just realised this is an hour long video after 30 minutes of watching it over the course of 6 hours huh oops

  • @leandroconti4435
    @leandroconti4435 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It should be considered a crime playing México and not going communist or full catolic

  • @jeremygalandiaz8224
    @jeremygalandiaz8224 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    soldaderas means female welders

  • @Zarvonn
    @Zarvonn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "I prefer quality over quantity" 15:02 but you chose mass assault?

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If you ignore the LARP doctrines are just stats.

    • @Zarvonn
      @Zarvonn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@FeedbackGaming true, but In hoi4 I usually define quality by using the best equipment to lose the least amount of manpower

    • @acsimark
      @acsimark 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zarvonn it increase the maximum special force in these case.

  • @huntURenemies
    @huntURenemies 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey, can you do a video about naval and use marines? Pls

    • @huntURenemies
      @huntURenemies 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or mainly focus on naval

  • @naturalbornpatriot6369
    @naturalbornpatriot6369 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How did you get a 1934 start date? R56 compatible?

  • @SOUVLAKOS
    @SOUVLAKOS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro uses a blank thumbnail with a blue emoji and calls it a day

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Minimal is the new meta

    • @SOUVLAKOS
      @SOUVLAKOS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@FeedbackGaming blue emoji is the new meta i guess

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      TRU

  • @pemm
    @pemm 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    those emojis

  • @TheArklyte
    @TheArklyte 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Dave, when a graph claims that USSR had more casualties then China, you pick any other graph😅 No, we didn't lose anywhere close to 40+ millions chinese did.

    • @KunalGarshan
      @KunalGarshan 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TheArklyte during ww2 not the sino jappanese war

    • @TheArklyte
      @TheArklyte 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@KunalGarshan Second Sino-Japanese War IS part of WWII. You can't count those casualties separately

    • @KaotikBOOO
      @KaotikBOOO หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheArklyte you can, depending on when you consider ww2 to have begun. Some consider it's 1936 with the invasion of ethiopia, some 1937 with the sino Japanese war, some 1939 with Germany's invasion of Poland,... Depending where you live and how your country took part of it. WW2 is more an umbrella word that englobe other more local conflicts that you can put in or out.
      You can see it like Korean war and Vietnam War, you rarely count the losses together despite both being considered part of the same conflict : cold war

  • @adamsaputrama5934
    @adamsaputrama5934 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vic3 when?

  • @oliwierbroda2575
    @oliwierbroda2575 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dave once again forgetting about women in the workforce decision.

  • @feather9557
    @feather9557 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1 minute gang

  • @The_Calcium_King
    @The_Calcium_King 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *I* don't necessarily *ha* te the blue emoji, it is *ve* ry nice. No *gu* y or girl should questio *n* it. *To* the max, *my head* says it is alright. *I* think we *need* to *help* Feedback to use it more.

  • @user-chumbuck3t
    @user-chumbuck3t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For some reason you sound like dantdm but less ecstatic

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Did you just compare me to a minecrafter....

  • @gareginnzhdehhimself
    @gareginnzhdehhimself 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Soldadera is a woman soldier

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      WOMEN in computer games?

  • @mykole.
    @mykole. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    something you can do is train horses with only a single horse in a division, and then change them to a full combat width horse division, thus making you able to train more horses at once

    • @mykole.
      @mykole. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      oh you literally say this 1 min after i wrote this lmao

  • @antoniotexo4083
    @antoniotexo4083 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The falangist path isn't working since 2022 and paradox haven't fixed it, this is only possible with the "communist" option

  • @John-li6sk
    @John-li6sk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ur a good girl

  • @dylanchampion9948
    @dylanchampion9948 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BRING BACK ALL THE CLICKS well mostly all the clicks

  • @mrjones1496
    @mrjones1496 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Day 3 of asking feedback to play the millennium dawn mod.

  • @alleythetoaster8401
    @alleythetoaster8401 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am like 90% sure Soldateras are Female Soldiers. Cuz unlike english, Spanish has gender forms for nouns. Like a normal language. Damn english, get on with it.

  • @pootis.145
    @pootis.145 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Change your pfp to the blue emoji

  • @dogosrobert69
    @dogosrobert69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doing subtitles word for word feels very TikToklike. There's a video analyzing SovietWomble's subtitles, it's really good(both the video and his subtitles): th-cam.com/video/0ZjEYTBJO7g/w-d-xo.html
    Great vid btw as always FBG!

  • @Floris_VI
    @Floris_VI 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why in the world would you go dispersed playing as mexico😂
    Also what is the point of using cav to bloat your army size when it tskes the same amount of manpower as infantry but is 25% more expensive
    And i cant find what in this video makes mexico's marines better than any other maxed marines which arent very hard to get as the usa or britan

    • @FeedbackGaming
      @FeedbackGaming  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mexico can be big. You have to believe!

  • @Onalot
    @Onalot 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you're interested in something, Check out getting 1941 adv light tank chassis in 1939 as Argentina. ;-) you're welcome a simple thanks to Onalot for the idea is all that's neccessary.

  • @TheVoodooMaker
    @TheVoodooMaker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    British English is true English anyway so what's that all about lol ? ALUMINIUM IT IS? OLD CHAPS

  • @Ihavpickle
    @Ihavpickle 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im brutally op, i just dont show it😈😈😈

  • @adaw2d3222
    @adaw2d3222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🔵