This was very interesting to watch! I’d love to hear your thoughts on this, If an architect designs a full curtain wall system with led lights embedded in the glass, allowing different images to be displayed on the facade, would that also be considered kinetic architecture? Or does a part of the building have to physically move to be considered kinetic?
Good question. There is already a building that exists similar to what you are saying. Check out 'Rye Lights' by Ryerson in downtown Toronto. As long as the building facade gives an illusion of movement, it is considered a form of 'kinetic architecture' as far as I know.
Great video as always. I knew that to an extent humanity was dabbling in type 4- on the micro dimensional scale, but i wasnt aware it could be done to buildings. Honestly i dont know where we are on the micro scale. We havent really fully mastered type 3- but we dabble in type 4-. Perhaps when quantum computing really picks up steam we could dabble beyond type 4-
Beyond type 4-? Maybe one day...but how bout we master the technology we already possess before delving into ever smaller and dualistically larger projects.
@@spencervance8484 I completely agree with you there! We should master what we have first before dividing our attention with other things and completely mess up on everything lol
@@CriticallySelected when you say master are you talking about mastery to the point of say a shovel? In which case absolutely anyone knows how to use. Or are you talking about to the level of say how to farm? In which case a relatively small group knows how but produce enough that they benefit everyone with their excess
@@spencervance8484 Well, the shovel analogy would be super useful if we could get to that level. But even the farming analogy would be extremely good! Because if we think about it, even today, the general public cannot do many specific tasks, for example, make a cell phone from scratch. But we all do have cell phones and there is no shortage even though only a handful people probably know about the inner workings and specifications!
If you enjoy content like this, do leave a LIKE, SHARE, and SUBSCRIBE to our channel!
As always, we appreciate all your love and support! ❤️😇🙏
You will have the 1k soon !
Cool! Thanks for opening my imagination to kinetic architecture.
Keep up the great work @criticallyselected 🙌🏻👌🏼
Glad you are enjoying the content! 😊
Great video 👍🥇
Glad you like it! 😊
Awesome video guys! I can always click with architecture. Waiting for future architecture videos
More on the way! 😇
1 K subscribers!!! Hurray!!
Great architecture video 👍
Glad you like it! 😇
This was very interesting to watch! I’d love to hear your thoughts on this, If an architect designs a full curtain wall system with led lights embedded in the glass, allowing different images to be displayed on the facade, would that also be considered kinetic architecture? Or does a part of the building have to physically move to be considered kinetic?
Good question. There is already a building that exists similar to what you are saying. Check out 'Rye Lights' by Ryerson in downtown Toronto. As long as the building facade gives an illusion of movement, it is considered a form of 'kinetic architecture' as far as I know.
@@CriticallySelected You know *EVERYTHING*
@@abyssano78 You are too kind! 😇🙏
That is *_MAGNIFIC_* Oh and you should do a discord server
Great idea, in the near future, we sure will! 😊
@@CriticallySelected cool ! I will be here, you can count on me !
My preferate is the bank with bamboo-like things btw, and your ?
@@abyssano78 I love that one! Its just so gold and shiny lol
@@CriticallySelected yeah! That's the thing it reflect what is a bank lmao
Great video as always. I knew that to an extent humanity was dabbling in type 4- on the micro dimensional scale, but i wasnt aware it could be done to buildings.
Honestly i dont know where we are on the micro scale. We havent really fully mastered type 3- but we dabble in type 4-. Perhaps when quantum computing really picks up steam we could dabble beyond type 4-
Absolutely! Quantum computers will definitely put us beyond type 4- I feel.
Beyond type 4-? Maybe one day...but how bout we master the technology we already possess before delving into ever smaller and dualistically larger projects.
@@spencervance8484 I completely agree with you there! We should master what we have first before dividing our attention with other things and completely mess up on everything lol
@@CriticallySelected when you say master are you talking about mastery to the point of say a shovel? In which case absolutely anyone knows how to use. Or are you talking about to the level of say how to farm? In which case a relatively small group knows how but produce enough that they benefit everyone with their excess
@@spencervance8484 Well, the shovel analogy would be super useful if we could get to that level. But even the farming analogy would be extremely good! Because if we think about it, even today, the general public cannot do many specific tasks, for example, make a cell phone from scratch. But we all do have cell phones and there is no shortage even though only a handful people probably know about the inner workings and specifications!