actually, I take that back. My technical home university's didactics suck in comparison to another university I visited. It's about the Teachers/Professors. You don't have the same opportunities for projects and self-development. I was wrong
hearing all of them use fancy words throws me back to school times... I never liked over complicated vocab because it doesn't translate the meaning to masses. nice facilities though!
The aim is to create the illusion of superiority. They don't really want you to precisely and clearly understand everything they say which is sad, since that is exactly the point of communication. _"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it."_
Unless your job is to communicate your job to the masses, I dont think it makes that much sense to dumb down words for non professionals to understand.
During this video I kept thinking about high intensity LEDs, which I first saw in MIT’s Technology Today. That was over a decade ago and I kept hearing of all the great things that could be done with them. But if I suggest something as simple as a RGB light strip to light a room, people are really resistant to it. So we package LEDs to look like Thomas Edison’s light bulb and they accept it, but loose all of the benefits, innovation and promise LEDs can bring. Real change is hard.
I see their motivation more as architectural art/cladding (with exception to concrete bit) rather than defining a new way of constructing a building. Very creative design wise.
The software they use can very well also be used for FEM simulations for preliminary structural analysis. There are plugins for Rhino/Grasshopper such as Karamba3D that does this, so they can use their parametric design for more than just cladding and use it for the entire structure.
What about the 3d shapes made with a single 2d plane? It would lower the cost of production : carving, molding vs producing sheets, cutting on the sheet
Hi there! This is Architect Chaula from India. I have a liking for RND in the fields of Design and Construction in Architecture, Sustainable and Vernacular Architecture. Thanks for sharing this video.
This research is fantastic, but don't hold your breath waiting for the construction industry to take it up. Buildings are complex animals, they need wiring, they need plumbing, they need to be sound proof, fire proof, they need to be thermal and solar efficient and they need to abide by all the planing and structural codes. And then - they have to be put together piece by piece, by a human hand. Robots constructing units or blocks fitted together on site may come sooner than later.
gives me an idea for a kind of smart block. standard 8x8x16 size with all of those attributes built into it. set, predetermined, built in channels/conduits that can be stacked or locked into each other forming the h20/power pathways you want. have insulative properties. wouldn't neccesarily be held together with traditional mortar/cement, but maybe tensioned along its long axis'. gonna have to work on that.... thanks for the inspiration.
its sad that 99.9% of clients budgets can't make this kind of wonderful thinking a reality. imagine if every single space and building had as much deep thinking present in the design as what they were describing. We can't all be santiago calatrava levels of over budget ^^;
It is good to design complex curves, which give a wholesome new experience to life, curves definitely moves us (as a non. architectural student would say after seeing this video) but we need to challenge the future how can the space can be regenerate to a whole new space? how can your build environment can change its internal space according to the functional requirements for the inhabits .. living individuals. I think they should add. their actually design philosphy comprising the functional requirements along with these curves bcoz then only it is architecture from art......
I studied building science in the faculty of Architecture (not at MIT). The one thing I could not come to terms with is the philosophical communication. I'd often read sentences over and over again and simply could not grasp the underlying jist. I came to the horrid realizaton that I am more engineer than architect. I may have a love for the beauty of design development but I admit I am incapable in the field.
Design is about the creative skills you can create. It takes practice with innovative thinking to be able to solve problems. Education prepares you to think, before you go to work in real life.
Pretty sure it will be used in real life. They are thinking of ways on how to do things differently. These things they create can be used to explore space, improve stability of buildings, and other stuff. Why are you, though I should probably say you from 2 yrs ago, hating on their innovation and way of improving the "design process of things." Hopefully the you now dont have the same idea from 2 yrs ago
Good for the industry I guess... reusing old mac to run a program only available on windows and using a free version of it is smart. Think twice my friend ;)
hi I am in ivory coast and I would like to do my study at the mit for achitecture. but my question is as follows: it takes how many years to go out to the mit for achitecture and become a professional. here is my question I await your answer impatiently
ok chat GPT, design a building that is both beautiful and functional for the modern world. make it resistant to emp attacks, super volcanos, and political campaign canvassers.
Is it possible to get into one of the top M.Arch programs without previous education or college degree if I show impressive talent or portfolio in every field of design ?
I think my works will be very interesting even to MIT architects. I designed my architectures based on visualization of forces, dimensions, and behaviors. I try not to analyze based on the given objects. I believe my thoughts in architecture can bring a new era.
Definition of realm does not state or clarify objectivity. It simply states space in dimension which can be observed through origin. Language barriers are barriers which are constructed with our limited imagination. architecture, linguistics and practicality always conflict in each and another. Incredibism is to understand and differentiate factual behaviours to determine. linguistics conflict practicality, architecture conflict linguistics, practicality conflict architecture. Confliction by the incredibism is a possibility in which observers can analyse the characteristics between matters and variables. If you fully understand and characterise the subject. You can apply it dimensionally. Incredibism is the way to credit beyond our dimension and it is possible through the incredibism method.
None of this was architecture...merely academicians attempting to confuse you by obscured archispeak. Theoretical engineering students is what the discipline has become...remember when architects designed buildings? What’s wrong with bricks and mortar, craftspeople, the hand made, the expression of the human-being, instead of the expression of the machine and industry?
Also I’m afraid the hand made and craftsmen are useless for this calibre of architecture, these are buildings are for either millions of people or a highly scientific nature and the cost and imprecision of the human would be disastrous. Sorry but parts of the world have moved beyond our small scale perspectives as humans x
Highly decorative and technologically complex architecture will eventually come to exist once the pendulum swings back to at the very least some attempt at reclaiming a sort of lost sense of craftsmaship. Complex systems like these haven't had the opportunity to leave where they've been developed, we'll have to wait until theyre widely tested in the real world before we can start to think about decoration and expressions.
Every profession have two kinds of people. One, the people addresses the needs of the public in that field. The other, the people who pushes the field forward doing eccentric and obscure experiments. Both have their own place in life.
Humans have needs that architecture is obliged to fulfil. I honestly see nothing of that here. Maybe MIT Architecture addresses human needs elsewhere, but in this video they seem only to be addressing their own (creative ego) needs. Please tell me more, so that I can have a more complete understanding of the worth of this program.
Please note that these are *experiments* by architects and architecture students. Architects are continuously developing to design buildings that supports people and environments. Also, architecture is quite complicated to explain. Showing a video of their goal of the experiments, rather than their main program, would help a larger audience to understand what the institute is trying to accomplish.
Yeah these are experiments. This seems egotistic because of the context but saving material in architectural production is an environmental issue, many of these experiments were around that concept. Also this is MITechnology so its about the cutting edge of tech. If you are interested in helping people at a more basic, need informed level try UCT South Africa. Many of the programs centre around helping impoverished communities.
George Haussman was very Classic in architecture ,what he mades in Paris is the better in European citys, Modernism style spoils the citys where we living. Are ugly and nobody wants to live in homes like that. Those designers must ask if they works for the people, or if they fit in reality. I have my doubts. Building homes for the peoples ,that got where to living. Its not only theory.
Really cool, but where's the practical application to human needs in everyday life? I just don't see the benefit of designing this way. I have always been of the belief that Need+Idea=Design, whereas in the video is appears that they are applying the reverse. It seems like they're designing from ego, not human needs.
schools are research institutes, they aim to find out that something is possible/might be a good idea, but it's up to an architect/engineer to pick it up and put it into use on an actual production.
Architecture is such a pseudoscience discipline.. it really doesn’t need to be so pseudoscientific.. 🙄🙄🙄 learn urban design and you will understand what the building is supposed to do for the city.. everything else is just some bullshit that someone told you in school.. a lot of architects just propagate bullshit - stuck between the client, the planner and the contractor, architects are often clueless as to what their role is, why things don’t go their way and what they are actually supposed to be doing.. no one needs spaceship buildings, we just need nice, simple buildings that work well, are easy to construct, easy to use, affordable, sustainable and high quality..
Shame most architecture is built in a modern brutalist style with many buildings being demolished demolished only a few decades later as no one wants to live in them, a lot of the time not even the architects themselves.
Honestly... this is more like art that engineering... this is what you would see as contemporary or "avant-garde" art, or what have you guys been smoking over there??😆
That's typical troll agressiveness. I enjoyed the video, i'm just not convinced this is the way architecture should take nowadays. nothing to do with imagination, thanks for that. Chill
Vladimir Jamet who cares if you liked this video editing / music / whatever or not lol... and I’m not even trolling just redirected your argument with your flawless logic towards you. I’m afraid this has everything to do with your lack of imagination, you can’t see the value in experimentation and technological advancements and you want something more concrete and been done a million times before. Sad! What is this “reality” and “ human needs” you’re speaking of anyway? I thought the cavemen have figured that out already, no?
@@user-yk1cw8im4h Well i guess you need to go to an architecture school and study sociology before having any more wrong interpretation of my words. Have a nice day. And thanks again for my "lack of imagination", as if u knew me.
Vladimir Jamet No, there is already a well established field of study called sociology. You go to architecture schools in order to study that? Well, that’s even more sad because you have learned the wrong stuff in the wrong department. Well for your last comment of me as if know you... you also talked MIT being sad and far away from your reality as if you have studied there!? (My day is good btw, no need for your fakeness)
We could not think of a better way to keep unwanted men out of women's spaces, so we made them wear frills that they could activate to scare men away. Fuck if you're going that far, might as well make it electrocute them too. Architecture really just is used as a stand-in for engineering of any kind in this video, eh?
I don't know why but it feels like a documentary and parody video at the same time 😂
How I'd wish I took architecture in MIT, if only I had the means in that time. I feel so jealous of the people who do have this opportunity
You could have the same spirit no matter where you are. You can do these projects at any university if you're dedicated enough
Mu granddaughter is eleven. She is always talking about how amazing mit is and how she wants to go here. Now I see why
@@michaels.9224 as if an eleven year old could grasp what MIT is like lol
@@kognitiveresonanz3562 inspireing
actually, I take that back. My technical home university's didactics suck in comparison to another university I visited. It's about the Teachers/Professors. You don't have the same opportunities for projects and self-development. I was wrong
La recherche, c’ est passionnant. C’est magique. On peut changer tout.
I don't know why, but I really like the way the video was cut. So chilly and enjoyable. Kind of flow-like experience watching it.
Yeah, because it is advertising, expensive like a Rolex
I’m a film student in New Mexico but i have an amazing appreciation for architecture
hearing all of them use fancy words throws me back to school times... I never liked over complicated vocab because it doesn't translate the meaning to masses. nice facilities though!
The aim is to create the illusion of superiority. They don't really want you to precisely and clearly understand everything they say which is sad, since that is exactly the point of communication.
_"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it."_
@@aaaaaa2206
i think the problem is people not understanding technical concepts.
They are not there to hold your hand or even teach you what they do.
Unless your job is to communicate your job to the masses, I dont think it makes that much sense to dumb down words for non professionals to understand.
...Watching this makes me happy!
These projects don’t do anything to make the world a better place.
Mega interesting, I wish more people had access to information and technology to do this more commonly, because it looks fascinating and fun
MIT curriculum is free online. Though there is the lack of equipment and materials that help in the learning process.
During this video I kept thinking about high intensity LEDs, which I first saw in MIT’s Technology Today. That was over a decade ago and I kept hearing of all the great things that could be done with them.
But if I suggest something as simple as a RGB light strip to light a room, people are really resistant to it. So we package LEDs to look like Thomas Edison’s light bulb and they accept it, but loose all of the benefits, innovation and promise LEDs can bring. Real change is hard.
i wish my university did more research for undergrads and allowed us to get more hands on experience
I see their motivation more as architectural art/cladding (with exception to concrete bit) rather than defining a new way of constructing a building. Very creative design wise.
correct
The software they use can very well also be used for FEM simulations for preliminary structural analysis. There are plugins for Rhino/Grasshopper such as Karamba3D that does this, so they can use their parametric design for more than just cladding and use it for the entire structure.
What about the 3d shapes made with a single 2d plane? It would lower the cost of production : carving, molding vs producing sheets, cutting on the sheet
Hi there! This is Architect Chaula from India. I have a liking for RND in the fields of Design and Construction in Architecture, Sustainable and Vernacular Architecture. Thanks for sharing this video.
My son’s dream school. He wants to be a architect one day.
hello, is he did that. im architect student 🥰
someday, i believe i will go there...
This research is fantastic, but don't hold your breath waiting for the construction industry to take it up. Buildings are complex animals, they need wiring, they need plumbing, they need to be sound proof, fire proof, they need to be thermal and solar efficient and they need to abide by all the planing and structural codes. And then - they have to be put together piece by piece, by a human hand. Robots constructing units or blocks fitted together on site may come sooner than later.
Michael Flynn 👍
gives me an idea for a kind of smart block. standard 8x8x16 size with all of those attributes built into it. set, predetermined, built in channels/conduits that can be stacked or locked into each other forming the h20/power pathways you want. have insulative properties. wouldn't neccesarily be held together with traditional mortar/cement, but maybe tensioned along its long axis'. gonna have to work on that.... thanks for the inspiration.
The whole thing about parametric architecture is more and more parameters will be added as it evolves , which includes building services too
its sad that 99.9% of clients budgets can't make this kind of wonderful thinking a reality. imagine if every single space and building had as much deep thinking present in the design as what they were describing. We can't all be santiago calatrava levels of over budget ^^;
Its even sadder that apparently the best that most architects can do in budget is a box with windows (or a window in the shape of a box)
TH-cam is India’s MIT
I wanna get into this school
It is good to design complex curves, which give a wholesome new experience to life, curves definitely moves us (as a non. architectural student would say after seeing this video) but we need to challenge the future how can the space can be regenerate to a whole new space? how can your build environment can change its internal space according to the functional requirements for the inhabits .. living individuals.
I think they should add. their actually design philosphy comprising the functional requirements along with these curves bcoz then only it is architecture from art......
Beautiful work team. Love it all
2:13 Boston Architectural College across the river has an excellent program for those who can't avail themselves of attending MIT.
0:25 Sketchup, on Windows XP, on a MacBook? MIT?
Think different
It's Rhino not Sketchup
This is excitingly cooool 😭✨❤️
You see architecture is basically learning one of everything
Hubris everywhere
I would have made a great architect. I taught Frank Lloyd Picasso everything she knew. Now who ARE you people and where is my horse?
exude their prowess
I studied building science in the faculty of Architecture (not at MIT). The one thing I could not come to terms with is the philosophical communication. I'd often read sentences over and over again and simply could not grasp the underlying jist. I came to the horrid realizaton that I am more engineer than architect. I may have a love for the beauty of design development but I admit I am incapable in the field.
Thanks ❤
Some of this just looks like mechanical engineering
It's how to overthink a design process of a thing, that won't be used in real life.
Must also make sure to describe it with pretentious language
Design is about the creative skills you can create. It takes practice with innovative thinking to be able to solve problems. Education prepares you to think, before you go to work in real life.
Pretty sure it will be used in real life. They are thinking of ways on how to do things differently. These things they create can be used to explore space, improve stability of buildings, and other stuff. Why are you, though I should probably say you from 2 yrs ago, hating on their innovation and way of improving the "design process of things." Hopefully the you now dont have the same idea from 2 yrs ago
Design error in the music track.: too loud until the title; too loud again, at counter 7:04.
Engineers: Am I a joke to u?
Kk great love architecture
Hope america fixes it's problem with car centric cities.
until now, am still searching for the title of the INTRO Song =(! It's bee 8 years
Most of the content here looked an awful lot like industrial design but what do I know, I studied neither.
It looks innovative and creative, however the cost and constructivility it is out the reach of the masses
Me dieron buenas ideas para las prácticas de mis alumnos, muchas gracias
lamentable saberlo, pobres alumnos
Nothing Nobody no la bardees tampoco hermano, no sabes el contenido de su materia o la concepción de su clase, mi opinión dale.
No es para menos, definir el camino de una clase por un simple video de youtube, eres muy amable y considerado, pero no gracias.
Teresa Urquizo 👍
Frei Otto type, you should collaborate with Munich ;)
Otro level 💯
You make the future happen ! That’s incredible.
Алта Крикун 🔥
how can u guys only uploaded the video on 720p, u guys an MIT 😂 kidding, great video btw
MIT is full of real geniuses......
Decided not to apply purely based on 0:26
well done
Good for the industry I guess... reusing old mac to run a program only available on windows and using a free version of it is smart. Think twice my friend ;)
I love this video!!!
Great video
amazing
3:50 covid in a nutshel
虽然身在中国的建筑TOP院校，但相比MIT我们似乎还是缺少了一点创新……
What do you mean by innovation?
I fell like this cool stuff makes a lot of engineer’s mad haha
where are the buildings then?
MITArchitektur oder OHNEArchitektur
hi I am in ivory coast and I would like to do my study at the mit for achitecture. but my question is as follows: it takes how many years to go out to the mit for achitecture and become a professional. here is my question I await your answer impatiently
Bro ,they are not gonna answer here for more research you should google the details 🙏
ok chat GPT, design a building that is both beautiful and functional for the modern world. make it resistant to emp attacks, super volcanos, and political campaign canvassers.
Can someone please tell abt getting into MIT for architectural masters ...
Like extracurriculars and the exams....
THAT'S ALL WELL AND GOOD BUT THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IN THE REAL WORLD IS 'MONEY AND BUDGET'
Glad they use Rhino, not Sketchup.
sabiq rusydi which one is better ?
WHY WHATS WRONG WITH SKETCH UP
@@princesstikka8007 both are great
Is it possible to get into one of the top M.Arch programs without previous education or college degree if I show impressive talent or portfolio in every field of design ?
whats the intro song?
I was asking this same question for years now. Did you find the answer to this? =)
I think my works will be very interesting even to MIT architects. I designed my architectures based on visualization of forces, dimensions, and behaviors. I try not to analyze based on the given objects. I believe my thoughts in architecture can bring a new era.
Is the visualization of forces a literal spatial representation of force fields/directions? How specifically are you visualizing those ideas?
@@stephenzhuang2743 through dimensional theories. incredibism is part of it.
Definition of realm does not state or clarify objectivity. It simply states space in dimension which can be observed through origin. Language barriers are barriers which are constructed with our limited imagination. architecture, linguistics and practicality always conflict in each and another. Incredibism is to understand and differentiate factual behaviours to determine. linguistics conflict practicality, architecture conflict linguistics, practicality conflict architecture. Confliction by the incredibism is a possibility in which observers can analyse the characteristics between matters and variables. If you fully understand and characterise the subject. You can apply it dimensionally. Incredibism is the way to credit beyond our dimension and it is possible through the incredibism method.
nice video
Does this solve real world problems……………
Are there books produced about this research?
Jesus Christ & Erguna coming soon, thank you Jesus
MIT ... where you can run Windows XP on a MacBook Pro in 2015
MIT where reusing old mac to run a program only available on windows and using a free legal version of it...
MIT where money is not a problem, the Bugatti Veyron of architecture... or how to kill 1 fly with an atomic bomb...
Because mac os is shit
gosh, the intro was so hard to listen to
either speak louder or lower the music volume
🙏
None of this was architecture...merely academicians attempting to confuse you by obscured archispeak. Theoretical engineering students is what the discipline has become...remember when architects designed buildings? What’s wrong with bricks and mortar, craftspeople, the hand made, the expression of the human-being, instead of the expression of the machine and industry?
I think you may just be stupid if you can’t understand this
Also I’m afraid the hand made and craftsmen are useless for this calibre of architecture, these are buildings are for either millions of people or a highly scientific nature and the cost and imprecision of the human would be disastrous. Sorry but parts of the world have moved beyond our small scale perspectives as humans x
Highly decorative and technologically complex architecture will eventually come to exist once the pendulum swings back to at the very least some attempt at reclaiming a sort of lost sense of craftsmaship. Complex systems like these haven't had the opportunity to leave where they've been developed, we'll have to wait until theyre widely tested in the real world before we can start to think about decoration and expressions.
@@charliehill8068 What is evolving past human ability? Human vanity projects or human needs?
Every profession have two kinds of people. One, the people addresses the needs of the public in that field. The other, the people who pushes the field forward doing eccentric and obscure experiments. Both have their own place in life.
MIT Architecture
How one can get into MIT Architecture?
u cant
visit their website , contact their consultant and ready to get into heavy student loans
Kraftsman Sheng okkk..... thanks for replying !!!!
Through the door
Be a master of Grasshopper, Python and C# in addition to the creative side, I doubt they won't admit you.
Humans have needs that architecture is obliged to fulfil. I honestly see nothing of that here. Maybe MIT Architecture addresses human needs elsewhere, but in this video they seem only to be addressing their own (creative ego) needs. Please tell me more, so that I can have a more complete understanding of the worth of this program.
é isto.
you have engineers for that purpose. Also architects; but actually, this is not only art if thats what you mean
ALL DEPENDS ... ART OR EGO ...
Please note that these are *experiments* by architects and architecture students.
Architects are continuously developing to design buildings that supports people and environments.
Also, architecture is quite complicated to explain.
Showing a video of their goal of the experiments, rather than their main program, would help a larger audience to understand what the institute is trying to accomplish.
Yeah these are experiments. This seems egotistic because of the context but saving material in architectural production is an environmental issue, many of these experiments were around that concept.
Also this is MITechnology so its about the cutting edge of tech. If you are interested in helping people at a more basic, need informed level try UCT South Africa. Many of the programs centre around helping impoverished communities.
George Haussman was very Classic in architecture ,what he mades in Paris is the better in European citys, Modernism style spoils the citys where we living. Are ugly and nobody wants to live in homes like that. Those designers must ask if they works for the people, or if they fit in reality. I have my doubts. Building homes for the peoples ,that got where to living. Its not only theory.
Meko bhi krni Baat.. 🙂
Razer mouse 0:17
MIT architecture is still in 19th century
Asif Shamsudeen of the 3rd millennium
camilo daraghma ..onju podappa..mandhabudhi
@@asifshamsudeen5736 Are you an architect?
What was the program they were working in?
Владимр Личков rhinoceros and its plugin grasshopper
what is the software at 3:17?
SOLIDWORKS
@@8p8c50 thankyou for the answer
What is this material you use at 6:23 ?
papper
plastic, when you photocopy a book for example, the cover of the photocopy is that material, flexible and translucent.
VALD à 7:01
Really cool, but where's the practical application to human needs in everyday life? I just don't see the benefit of designing this way. I have always been of the belief that Need+Idea=Design, whereas in the video is appears that they are applying the reverse. It seems like they're designing from ego, not human needs.
schools are research institutes, they aim to find out that something is possible/might be a good idea, but it's up to an architect/engineer to pick it up and put it into use on an actual production.
7:20.
6:31
* ENGINEERS WALKS IN * HAHA NO.
yeah sure how the hell university still fund these guys?
Architecture is such a pseudoscience discipline.. it really doesn’t need to be so pseudoscientific.. 🙄🙄🙄 learn urban design and you will understand what the building is supposed to do for the city.. everything else is just some bullshit that someone told you in school.. a lot of architects just propagate bullshit - stuck between the client, the planner and the contractor, architects are often clueless as to what their role is, why things don’t go their way and what they are actually supposed to be doing.. no one needs spaceship buildings, we just need nice, simple buildings that work well, are easy to construct, easy to use, affordable, sustainable and high quality..
PENN state has better architecture programs
6666
Shame most architecture is built in a modern brutalist style with many buildings being demolished demolished only a few decades later as no one wants to live in them, a lot of the time not even the architects themselves.
tf is wrong with the music? MIT music dept where are you?
Honestly... this is more like art that engineering... this is what you would see as contemporary or "avant-garde" art, or what have you guys been smoking over there??😆
Eh, Georgia Tech looks better
I live in BOSTON and I must say that MIT is the ugliest university I have ever seen.
Incredibly disconnected from Human needs. Far away from an architecture made for humans. Far away from reality. Sad
That’s typical of what a human with a total lack of imagination says, sad.
That's typical troll agressiveness. I enjoyed the video, i'm just not convinced this is the way architecture should take nowadays. nothing to do with imagination, thanks for that. Chill
Vladimir Jamet who cares if you liked this video editing / music / whatever or not lol... and I’m not even trolling just redirected your argument with your flawless logic towards you. I’m afraid this has everything to do with your lack of imagination, you can’t see the value in experimentation and technological advancements and you want something more concrete and been done a million times before. Sad! What is this “reality” and “ human needs” you’re speaking of anyway? I thought the cavemen have figured that out already, no?
@@user-yk1cw8im4h Well i guess you need to go to an architecture school and study sociology before having any more wrong interpretation of my words. Have a nice day. And thanks again for my "lack of imagination", as if u knew me.
Vladimir Jamet No, there is already a well established field of study called sociology. You go to architecture schools in order to study that? Well, that’s even more sad because you have learned the wrong stuff in the wrong department. Well for your last comment of me as if know you... you also talked MIT being sad and far away from your reality as if you have studied there!? (My day is good btw, no need for your fakeness)
Defensible dress
We could not think of a better way to keep unwanted men out of women's spaces, so we made them wear frills that they could activate to scare men away.
Fuck if you're going that far, might as well make it electrocute them too.
Architecture really just is used as a stand-in for engineering of any kind in this video, eh?
MIT is boring ... I didn’t see a single building in that video
All of the pretentious & sculptural bullshit aside, how does this help anyone? Please enlighten me.
MIT seems to be super gender biased ... none of the female speakers face shown ... all focus on male team members !!!!
I couldn't help noticing this either.
nishantthakurji nah, I think you're just one of those people trying to make something to whine about out of nothing.
VladimirDaGreat he is gay because he wants to see more woman talk? 🤔
Pan Werv no, he's gay because he is whining about something so petty
Overshitting a lot
why?
agree haha