А война в Украине как раз по причине тамогавков. С территории Украины можно поражать цели в центральной России. Договориться не получилось .Вот и результат.А какая сильнее нет смысла сравнивать.И та и другая убивает а не щекочет.
Если не в курсе, согласно договоренностям между США и РФ ракеты малой и средней дальности (наземного базирования) не могут распологаться в Европе, морского можно, а подходящих морских носителей у Украины нет))) Р.С. ракеты могут появиться не только на Украине но и на Кубе или у Ирана
@@zaczac1934 Согласно договоренности и Украина имела нейтральный статус.Только договоренности все летят в попу. Не так ли? Покажи хоть один договор который не нарушен? Борьба с терроризмом обернулась террором.И покрывается ООН.Не странно ли?
Yeah i dont get where they got this "Russia didnt have Cruise missile before kalibr". They literally had best Anti-Ship cruise missiles in the world P-500 Bazalt(1963) and P-700 Granit(1985). Both having really advanced guidance system where missiles work together to target different ships and only having having to pop op for target scan. Then there are P-270 Moskit,RK-55 and SS-N-3 Shaddock last one being from 1959.
@@fraerok01 Russia is still the Soviet Union, even contrary to the opinion of Putin and our anti-Soviet elite. For a long time the Americans referred to the USSR as "Soviet Russia", now they call it "Modern" Russia.
I wonder, who's going to tell authors of video, that Soviet union had TWO such missiles, from different lineups and design bureaus, since 80s as well? Kh-55 and S-10.
Actually, the 'author' of the video is not even the author. He has just blatantly stolen the info he uses in the video above from an article from Naval Post called 'Which cruise missile is more powerful, Tomahawk or Kalibr?'. He should keep his fingers crossed that the original author doesn't find out about that.
>1:42 Until 2015, it was thought that only the USA and Britain had this capability 1958 The Raduga KSR-2 fitted with a one-megaton nuclear warhead 1962 The Raduga KSR-5 supersonic, fitted with a 350kt nuclear warhead 1962 KSR-11 1961 K-10S supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead 1960 Kh-20 supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead 1960 P-15 Termit 1968 Kh-22 supersonic, fitted with 1Mt thermonuclear warhead 1968 P-70 Ametist 1983 Kh-55 198? Kh-101 1984 P-270 Moskit Legend says it is still thought so to this day.
They are mostly anti ship missiles or land based missiles based on anti ship missies therefore they are not much useful against land based targets....... tomahawk was specially designed to engaged long range land based targets.
@@xfxox See, here you gave example of p 15 missile which is soley used for anti shipping purpose and shore based targets to some extent(by limited land attack, I meant attacking shores only) . For precised deep strikes, you need capabilities like TERCOM which is absent in those missiles.
@@DipakkrSaha I see you are very good in this field of knowledge. Could you tell me the range of the best American cruise missile in 1958? And could you tell me " FOR WTF TERCOME you talked about in 1958 ?!?!?! Or you speak just to have "BLA BLA" comments here ?!?!?!?
Russia has a different usage doctrine from the US so direct comparison are hard to make. However, the Russian approach has proven interesting and cost effective.
В СИРИИ ТАМАГАВК ПОКАЗАЛ СЕБЯ.ДВА ЭКЗЕМПЛЯРА ПОПАЛИ В РОССИЙСКИЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ДЛЯ ЕГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ.ЕГО ПАРАМЕТРОВ .А ВОТ КАЛИБР БЬЁТ С ТОЧНОСТЬЮ ДО МИЛЛИМЕТРА.А ДАЛЬНОСТЬ ЕЁ ПОЛЁТА СОСТАВЛЯЕТ БОЛЕЕ 2000 КМ А НЕ 1500 А ЕЩЁ ОНА СПОСОБНА НЕСТИ ЯДЕРНУЮ БОЕГОЛОВОКУС САМОНАВЕДЕНИЕМ.НИ ОДИН РАДАР НЕ МОЖЕТ ЕЁ ЗАСЕЧЬ ЕЁ МОГУТ ОБНОРУЖИТЬ ЛИШЬ ПРИ ПОДЛЁТЕ К ЦЕЛИ НУ КОНЕЧНО УЖЕ НИЧТО НЕ ПОМОЖЕТ ОТ ЕЁ УДАРА В ТАКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ. КРОМЕ ОНИ МОГУТ РАБОТАТЬ В КОМАНДЕ И ПЕРЕДАВАТЬ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ ДРУГ ДРУГУ ЧЕМ НЕ МОЖЕТ ПОХВАЛИТЬСЯ АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ ТАМАГАВК .ВЫ АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ВСЕГДА ПРИНИЖАЕТЕ РОЛЬ ЧУЖИХ РАЗРАБОТКАХ ТАМАГАВК ЭТО РАКЕТА ПРОШЛОГО СТОЛЕТИЯ А РАКЕТА КАЛИБР ЭТО РАКЕТА НОВОГО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ И НЕ НАДО УТВЕРЖДАТЬ ЧТО ОНИ ОДНОГО ПАРАМЕТРА.ЭТО СОВСЕМ РАЗНЫЕ ПО СВОЕМУ СТРОЕНИЮ .У РОССИИ ЕСТЬ ЕЩЁ ОДНА РАКЕТА НА ЯДЕРНОМ ТОПЛИВЕ ЭТО БУРЯВЕСТНИК. ОНА МОЖЕТ НАХОДИТСЯ НЕСКОЛЬКО СУТОК В НЕБЕ ТО ЕСТЬ УДАРИТЬ ТОГДА КОГДА ЭТОГО НЕ ОЖИДАЕТ ПРОТИВНИК ТАК У РОССИ НЕ ОДИН АРСЕНАЛ А МНОЖЕСТВО.ЧЕГО НЕТ У США И ЕЕ СОЮЗНИКОВ..КСТАТИ ЭТИ РАКЕТЫ МОГУТ ДОЛЕТЕТЬ НАПРИМЕР ДО ЕВРОПЫ ЗА ПЯТЬ МИНУТ ИЗ АКВАТОРИИ ЧЁРНОГО МОРЯ. НУ А ЕСЛИ ОНИ УДАРЯТ КАЛИБРАМИ НАПРИМЕР НА ДАЛЬНЕМ ВОСТОКЕ ПО США ГДЕ РОСТОЯНИЕ ДО США ВСЕГО ЛИШЬ 83 КМ ТО БУДЕТ ДОРОГО СТОИТЬ США .У РОССИИ ВСЁ ЕСТЬ ВСЕ ПРИРОДНЫЕ БОГАТСТВА НУ ПО ТЕРРИТОРИИ ОНА САМАЯ БОЛЬШАЯ ЧАСТЬ ПЛАНЕТЫ .И ЗЕМЛИ СВОЕЙ ХВАТАЕТ ТАК ЗАЧЕМ РОССИИ НА КАКОГО ТО НАПАДАТЬ .ВАС ВСЕХ ЗОМБИРУЮТ МНИМОЙ УГРОЗОЙ ДЛЯ СВОИХ ЦЕЛЕЙ ВАШИ ПРАВИТЕЛИ,ВАШИ ОЛИГАРХИ.И ВАШ НАРОД ВЕРЯТ В ЭТОТ БРЕД.АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ПОСМОТРИТЕ СОВЕТСКИЙ МУЛЬТФИЛЬМ КОТ ЛЕОПОЛЬД. ТАМ ОН ГОВОРИТ ДАВАЙТЕ ЖИТЬ ДРУЖНО В МИРЕ
Only for antiship variant. Also for much shorter range about 150-450km Also the missile tip is different, rounded for cruise missiles variant and sharp cone for antiship variant.
The USSR also had cruise missiles analogous to the tamahawk, which were put into service back in 1984, and they had been developing them since 1975, but their states were asked to remove them from the agreement on medium-range missiles. The name of this missile is S-10 "Granat" (URAV Navy Index: 3K10, according to NATO codification: SS-N-21 "SAMPSON"). The Caliber missiles are not really TAmagavk, this is a family of missiles of various ranges and purposes, including in the anti-ship missile version with a supersonic detachable missile with a warhead, and sea-based cruise missiles of the Granit type (URAV Navy Index: 3M45, according to NATO codifications: SS-N-19 "Shipwreck"), "Volcano" (Navy URAV Index (missiles): 3M70), (Navy URAV Index - 3M55, according to the classification of the US Department of Defense and NATO - SS-N-26 Strobile), May hit also on earthly targets in the depths.
Russia developed many cruise missiles in a span of 5-10 years, Kalibr is just one of them. P-800 Oniks, Indian Brahmos, the deadliest : Zicron and the future P-900 Alfa and Brahmos 2. The Kalibr-M is like a hybrid of zicron and Kalibr since it is also hypersonic nature.
@Chano Leyva Missiles arent really that expensive you know, at most a single one may cost just around 1 million, and even less since its Russian system not a US one.
The kalibr-M is not hypersonic, i dont know where you get this. Its a regular kalibr missile with conformal fuel tanks to extend its range, just like the k-55 with conformal tanks.
@Chano Leyva ahh yes the good old, we keep our stuff secret story. Isnt the US one of the most open countries in regards to weapon development. Yes it is. In fact its less then a month ago when the US reported its hypersonic strike weapon just failed for the third time during testing. Meanwhile its actually Russia and China that keep most of the details about their programs secret.
It's telling that the Americans were adamant that Russian claims of hacking and re-targetting tomahawk cruise missiles in Syria were propaganda then the block V comes out in 2021 with the main upgrade is making them harder to hack.
Yes there is no evidence these hit their targets, and Russia showed off undetonated missiles they took down. Yet this video claims the aging tomahawk has better ew resistance. If that's true than Russian ew is way ahead of us.
@Varangian Guard Yes I remember that ... that was the one where the USA claimed that 20 + tomahawks were used to destroy an unhardened low rise university building. @ $2 million/ea for the missiles + the cost keeping a fleet of ships in the Mediterranean ... I would have done the job for $250K using 2 excavators and I would have left them with a nice clean site ... the superstructure was still standing after the strike. Either Tomahawk missiles are extremely smart and won't damage anything they aren't supposed to ... or they are complete crap ... or one or two tomahawks hit the site and the rest were disabled.
@@jamesricker3997 So the American Patriot air defense system is much superior to the S-400 air defense system. Clear. Thank you friend, I am glad to know that Russian weapons can be compared exclusively only against Somali.
@@jamesricker3997 Вообще наоборот. Это США всегда указывают чуть больше, а русские чуть меньше. Пример Калибр, Кода 30 лет все думали, что его дальность 350 км, итог потвержденных стрельб на 1600
The Russians are very well able to jam Tomahawk missiles. They delivered proof in Syria. The US is not able to jam Kalibr missiles, so jut do the math? Kalibr wins on all fronts.
You can jam Kalibr navigation satellites just as easy as tomahawks, also a lot fewer Kalibr and a whole lot fewer launching platforms for its so do the actual math! Tom>Kal!
What's crazy, is that for less money, our opponents are able to outrange our missiles while able to go as fast or even faster and deliver the same or more payload for cheaper. Just astounding.
The first time I knew the cost of Tomahawk missile was during the US mission in Libya (vs Moamer Gaddafi). 1 million usd per missile, there goes my dads tax 😭😭😭
Russians and Chinese working on the development and production of weapons are likely paid 10 times less than Americans. Also the sector is owned by the government so they don't use private corporations to make astronomical profits at the expense of tax payers.
@@starchild692 oh yeah I read it once that weapon factories like "United Aircraft Corporation" (the merging body of Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Tupolev, etc) is owned by the government. I think that explains why Russian price on developing-producing the cruise missiles is cheaper compared to US
Crazy how those military installations fire back still. Even if that were the case, the Russians will figure out where the phrase "why are the threes speaking Vietnamese" comes from. Now they speak Ukrainian with Javelins and NLAWs.
Как то очень скромно автор умолчал о залпе по Сирии сотней топоров из которых семьдесят не долетели до цели. Многие упали по непонятным причинам. Это об устойчивости ракеты к воздействию РЭБ. К тому же Калибр развивает скорость до 2.5 маха. А топор дозвуковой. Сравнение: XXI век и XX.
@@Hugo_Stiglitz_1 А какие данные тебе нужны? Известно, что долетает с Каспийского моря до Средиземного, а с Черного до Львова. Номенклатуры экспортных ракет(в урезанном по ТТХ характеристикам) в открытом доступе. Википедия может помочь. Более десяти вариантов.
rosjanie zakłócili tor lotu rakiet Tomahawk w syrii tak że w nic nie trafiły a amerykanie wystrzelili ponad 70 pocisków, są one obecnie uważane za przestarzałe i są modernizowane na zakłócenia elektromagnetyczne generowane przez rosjan
I don't the remember where I read the article but is more or less as follows: During Dessert Storm the first 200 cruise missiles were declared "obsolete" and the loss expected was 50%, only two crashed, other two were shoot down by AAA. Effective rate of 98%. Even the military officials were "frozen" with the result.
And when the Russia Defense Minister declared that they had shot down 71 of the 105 cruise missiles fired by Trump, France and UK it was found that almost all missiles found their target. (once crashed a launch) That was confirmed by craters from satellite imagery. They also claimed they jammed the rest. Nothing the Russians say about their weapons is accurate. Tomahawk is affordable and reliable. The Mk II version has 1350nmi range (about 2400km). If The USN wanted to it could increase range so it could continue using the same missile from the same launch cells simply by fitting a modern Turbofan engine. similar to the Mk II. It seems the USN has other ideas.
@@Tattlebot US weapons are tried and tested and they take years to develop because the testing process is so complex. And when the weapons are in service they work. You say you would not stake your life on them well they took out the Syria base that launched chemical attacks.
@@bighands69 that's not true. For example, HARM has a dismal record against second and third rate adversaries in Serbia and Iraq. Harpoon, HARM, and Tomahawk are just too slow. The probability of interception by a serious adversary like Russia or China is very high. The US tries to create a Tom Clancy perception of their military capability while in real life, many systems are not fit for purpose.
Убойный аргумент; "не знаем ТТХ "Калибров", поэтому "Томагавки" лучше". Только вот факты говорят обратное. Особенно про высокую точность и не восприимчивость к помехам. И про "засекреченность" результатов массового применения калибров в Сирии ложь. Только из утюгов и домофонов не транслировали кадры поражения целей и результат был превосходный; все долетели и попали в цель
Так называемый "калибр" это та же старая Советская ракета С-10 "Гранат" .,,чего же здесь неизвестного ??? Или ты думаешь что в нищей отсталой Раше где даже телевизор с телефоном не в состоянии собрать, за 30 лет вставания с колен что то новое изобрели ??? Совковая ракета С-10 ... плавным движением языка русских "изобретателей" вдруг стала "кОлибром"🤣 а Совковая С-300 стал С-400 и 500, Т-72 обозвали в Т-90 а ракету ОТРК "Искандер " вдруг стали обзывать и Цирконом и даже Кинжалом, и не важно что их у Рашки нет ни в ВВС ни на ржавом флоте.Понты у голодных и нищих русских, это самое важное.
🤣🤣 все что рашка предоставила .,,это один и тот же кадр, как некое мини - корыто из Каспийского болота, выпускает ракету ....ни о каких 24 ракетах нет информации а так же КУДА и как они угодили, и был ли вообще пуск !?? Пуск 59 ТОМОГАВКОВ ты и сейчас найдёшь.....особенно по кадрам разбомбленой базы "Швйрат" ... а Рашка куда пульнула ??? По ПРОПАГАНДЕ Раши ??!🤣🤣🤣
По данным спутниковой разведки Израиля, уничтожены 44 цели, в 10 из них по несколько прпаданий. А в Рашке чтоб завуалиррвать свой позор ,стали тявкать и скулить ... "Акела промахнуося,Акела промахнулся" ..., потом в Рашке выдумали новую сказку..,из 59 ТОМОГАВКОВ 36 Рашка "сбила" и даже угрожали предоставить " штабе из сбитый ТОМОГАВК"....потом пропаганда поняв что облажались (ПВО Раши молчали как мыши под веником) выдумали новую сказку ...,де все ТОМОГАВКИ Рашка отвела от целей неким старым допотопным РЭБ,но почему то этот РЭБ ещё ни разу не спас самолёты и вертолеты Рашки в Сирии ....а их Раша потеряла в Сирии аж 16 единиц !! Но самое смешное ,что Рашка не показывала своему быдло народу кадры ...от того что осталось от базы Шайрат, но мы то их видели, поэтому и всегда смеёмся над жалким потугами голодной России.
@@НиколайКичигин-б7о Ага,поэтому 7 год а Сирии нет,есть лишь Анклавы контролируемые США, Турцией,Израилем и Ираном- Асадом, у которых Раша на подхвате.И чего же там у Раши "всё получилось" ??? Удержать мёртвого Асада у власти !?? Поэтому ваш карлик Путин все время бегал к нашей Меркель и клянчил деньги на Сирию....читай Асада !? Не смеши Ваня ,я знаю что русские глупы на генном уровне,поэтому русские живут в Германии по 17 лет,а язык выучить не в силах,но от русских есть и польза в Германии,моют наши общественные туалеты на Аутохоф Германии.Хоть на это вы годны ,к тому же зарплата русского санитара мойщика туалетов в Германии ...от 1.400 евро в месяц ( вашими деревянными рублями ,где то 120 .000 руб? ) такие зарплаты у руских лишь на крайнем севере в нефтегазовой отрасли)🤣👍 а ты продолжай меня веселить русскими сказками.Так чо там у Раши в Сирии получилось то ??? Самый нефтегазовой регион Сирии в руках США и Курдов, а именно Раша сама ничего не контролирует,лишь на подхваие у Ирана и их марионетки Асада.
I hadn't watched the video, gonna watch later. But if we are not being biased then I believe everyone who has knowledge know that generally Russia has more powerful missiles.
Kaliber is faster and with longer ranges , both are accurate with targets , this point is not a problem for huge super powers , both have advaced navigation systems .
@@jamesricker3997 wasn’t it the standard in military? All country never releases real figures(usually more than 50% boost compared to announced figures)
@@jamesricker3997 during 2017 attacks in Syria, Syrian sam systems managed to shot down 90% of tomahawks missiles fired, and we are talking about old soviet sam systems. Modern russian built sam systems can easily defeats any tomahaks attack. Like the us patriot sam systems the tomahawk is a faillure.
@@mcbmcb5163 Yep, the US military tech is growing older with each passing day. Russia and China are already ahead of them in most of the cases. Compared with what the US has, Chinese destroyers are superior, Both the Chinese and Russian missiles are better, Russian tanks are better and the advantage the US had with its 5th gen aircraft is quickly eroding. Especially considering F-35, aka the 'Flying Coffin', constant failures.
@@mcbmcb5163 that's Russian propaganda lol, unless that 90% can be independently verified, the 2017 attacks was a success. Anyways the Tomahawk is a subsonic missile, shooting it down is pretty easy regardless
@snsproduc probably you were watching anti-air missle launches, targeted to intercept the cruise missiles and failed hitting randomly ground targets. that's a common case this war
Russia has advanced significantly and much further than the United States in the field of electronic warfare. Do you really think that the Caliber cruise missile does not have excellent EW defense and countermeasure capabilities? You are naive..
Totally agree with you..I don't compare Kalibr to tomahawk..tomahawk can be easily destroyed by air defense systems while it is cruising due to the subsonic speed..Kalibr has mach 3 speed in other words hypersonic speed and it is not easy to be destroyed while it is cruising...
How "Russia has advanced significantly and much further than the United States in the field of electronic warfare" prove it! American processor technology is at least 20 years ahead of Russia and that is only the commercially available technology.
@@napobg6842 результат превосходства рассийских средств РЭБ это количество не попавших в цель томагавков в Сирии . практически все мимо за редким исключением.
First of all....France also has cruise missile . It's the MdCN, the naval version of Scalp missile. Second....Russia use the GLOSNAS system.Not the GPS.
@@Stephano.MBravo1 I guess I didn't make a proper distinction between the two...both are used for global position and navigation but produced by different countries. Glonase and gps are the same thing. A Toyota and a Nissan are the same thing... both are vehicles made by different companies.
@@timookello3822 so me and you we are the same thing? Just born from different moms in different countries but still we are clones....!???? Are u listening to yourself?🤣🤣🤣🤣
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The events in Ukraine have shown that the Caliber has a very powerful jamming system on board, there is a video. in which two missiles of the Ukrainian S-300 system fly past the Caliber missile, ignoring it. Of course, Ukraine has old S-300 systems, but the oldest S-300 is more perfect than the newest Patriot complex
@Zamhoidn Landshut These are Ukrainian artillery, tanks and armored vehicles that are preparing to "defend Ukraine from Russian aggression." Although, they are placed in cities right in the middle of residential buildings, so any retaliatory strike will lead to the mass death of civilian Ukrainians, but who cares? The outstanding democratic leader Zelensky does not care at all about this, so the terrible evil tyrant Putin will have to think about it.
We need to give Ukraine the Patriot missile defense system and then no more Kalibr missiles would make it to Ukrainian targets- like hospitals and schools……
En el ataque a shairat quedo muy claro que el tomahawk por mas que lo modernicen es obsoleto a sistemas de interferencias e interceptacion. Por otro lado su historial de fallos a causado muchas disculpas por su capacidad de atacar blancos civiles como hospitales y centros de cruz roja.
Tomahawk have high failure rate . in 2001 when USA fire them on Afghanistan the were flying over pakistan where about Dozen fall inside pakistan and which pakistan reverse engineered and made Babur cruise missile from it , which have range of about 800 km
"Невероятную" точность томагавка видел весь мир в Сирии, когда половина ракет улетело вообще в неизвестном направлении, а остальные взорвали пару ненужных сараев. Охренненая точность.
@@YaMomsOyster Why should he make math, the whole world, and the whole scientific community is using the metric system, that is, in fact, logical, not yards, feet, inches, pounds...
Are those same Tomahawk missiles that was fired in Syria? What was the effectiveness against old Soviet air defense? 26%... Kalibr wins in many aspects.
LOL, yeah that's what the Russia's state controlled "RT network" told you. The satellite images release by the US prove that is a LIE! The missiles all hit their targets.
@@_Coffee4Closers You mean those satellite images which show a couple of craters on an airstrip of an airport, which were reportedly done by 100+ missiles?
Не так все однозначно. И не такя уж и старая ПВО Сирии была в тот момент. Сами ракеты важны в ПВО, но основа это радар, а в небе над Сирией был тогда А-50. Такие машины очень хорошо с неба видят цели и отлично наводят ракеты. Да и да и новейшие Российские electronic warfare systems "Красуха" там были. Часть объектов всетаки были поражены, у Сирии ракет просто не хватило на всех. Но в целом США в Сирии имели дело с старыми ракетами ПВО и новейшими радарами РФ.
Isn't the Kalibr cruise missile supersonic at the terminal phase while the tomahawk is sub-sonic? Isn't this a distinct advantage? So how is it not possible to make a complete comparison?
Нет калибр полностью дозвуковая ракета.... Но в ролике не сказано о том что калибр может, некоторых модификаций может ставить помехи вражеским РЛС. Плюс калибр летит намного ниже томагавка...
Both missiles capabilities almost identical, ranges gap can be easily fix together with other technical differences. What makes kalibr better was the production cost per missiles.
I guess US 763 billion dollars of military spending beats Russian 62 billion every time and any small differences in capability pale when you buy 1000's more of a slightly inferior missile, if indeed it even is. US GDP 21 Trillion Russia 1.4, smaller than Italy. Also top 20 tech companies in the world the majority are US. So any advances the the Kaliber may have will be quickly surpassed
@@gyasiansa3358 Are you sure. Is the Tomahawk totally fire n forget? Any data two way system can be intercepted. Whether you can break through its firewalls and alter the data and base programming is a different thing.
You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets. Also bunch of them were landed by Russian, at which point it never detnanated and was taken apart
@@TA-op3vn "You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets"! No need for me to elaborate on anything. When you are the one telling the lie you obviously know what am I talking about
@@laknidubandara Obviously because it is one thing when he and people like him just talk and a whole other thing to prove it. Like there were video in the very same day in the morning showing the amount of damage. There are satellite images confirming the hits.
US aircraft and missiles have star trackers that can locate them to within 180m day or night and through cloud. That's how a trident would locate itself should the GPS satellite system be destroyed. Once over land a tomahawk can user its radar for terrain counter mapping and a camera for digital scene correlation. The accuracy won't be effected at all if GPS was lost.
Kalibr is supersonic rocket 1,2-3M, Tomahawk is subsonic 0,98M. Kalibr is protected from electromagnetic distortions, Tomahawk is not, witch is very important because Russians have very powerful jamming devises.
Ukrainians shoot down about half of all missiles shot at them, including Kalibr missiles. If Ukrainians had better anti-missile defenses, they'd probably shoot down all of them.
@@a0flj0 Although I am completely behind Ukraine in this bloody and unjustified war of destruction and aggression by Russia, I must say that this is nonsense. Ukraine, in my opinion, has launched a maximum of 5-20% of the missiles. Israel, for example, has one of the best defense systems in the world with the Irondome and also only manages just over half, but more than 80% of the missiles fired at cities. In such a large country as Ukraine with e.g. the Patriot PAC-3 system, maybe 40-50% would be possible. For important targets or cities like Kiev with good protection, maybe even more, close to 80%.
Нам преподаватель рассказывал, как он в 70-ые делал систему распознавания ландшафта по спутниковым снимкам, которая использовалась для запусков крылатых ракет.
Yup... I came here to educate myself on what it is that I was watching. A lot of Russian equipment is outdated........ but from the videos I just watched on the Kalibr I would say this weapon is pretty good. Go watch. It was low, crazy fast, and looked like it hit its target to me.
The video doesn't contain accurate information, none can beat Russia when it comes to weapon technology. Tomahawk is subsonic and kalibr is a supersonic missile, the video uploader chose to ignore. There is no comparison b/w Tomahawk and kalibr, comparing Subsonic and Supersonic missile.
And who said tomahhawks works? Only against third world nations without air defenses like Lybia and IRAQ. Kalibers are modern cruise missiles from 2012 , while Tomahacks are from the 80s.. Both have satatelite navigation , and both have ECM capabilies. there are different versions. Tomahwaks are subsonic.. While KALIBRS have super sonic version of them , 3x times faster than tomahawks. And Tomahawks range is about 1,200km while Kalibrs range is 2,600km. Is battle proven in the syrian war and now ukraine war ,have been able to hit with precision the most defended airspace in all europe and with more electronic warfare hostile environment. Kalibrs are combat proven way more than Tomahawks in Modern wars. Tomawaks is old tech ,and they not stealthy , and very easy to intercept.. look for Syrian cruise missiles strike by Trump.. about 95% of them intercepted /jammed or missed its target. Israel don't use them anymore. They have no choice to use tomawaks because they have a large inventory of them and need to be used. until they develop something new.
@@technoartfest8708 very true. America needs fifth generation cruise missiles with range and speed. In this area it lags not just the Russians, but also the Chinese , Europeans and Israelis. Even India outclasses America with it's brahmos. I just don't understand why America doesn't team up with Israel to produce world class missiles. Perhaps it's too proud. Israel just came out with the ice breaker. If America has any intelligence, it will try to get the technology of this missile before China does.
@@learnerm3120 Probably ,One of the big problems ,aside of Budget and cost , is the fact that US navy have about 50 to 60 arleigh burke class destroyers , that only compatible with Tomahawks. and also the fact that most of NATO ,their warships also use them and also because of the big inventory of tomawaks they have in storage. So building a new cruise missile means , they will also need to build a new destroyer class ,that can equip them. So is very expensive for US and NATO to switch to other cruise missiles ,without having warships that can use them.
@@technoartfest8708 It is an issue but not one that is insurmountable. For one , warships are not the only means of delivery. Secondly , warships can and do have different vertical launch systems. At least the Chinese design their new warships to be able to deliver missiles with different sizes. Third , holding yourself back because you have a bunch of 40 year old missiles you don't want to throw away could be a sign you are not ready for prime time.
@@technoartfest8708 Tomahawked have been continuously upgraded since introduced. Those Block Number and Mod numbers means something. Old usually means reliable and cheap.
Вопрос поставлен не корректно. Главное, что точнее и менее подвержено внешним воздействиям. У Томогавка помехоустойчивость почти нулевая. А стреляют они в версии с обычным БЧ исключительно по данным GPS. Если ракета три раза не получает трек-отметку, она самоликвидируется, т.к. по алгоритму считается, что управление потеряно. Постановка помех сигналу навигации делает их практически бесполезными. Что наглядно показал массовый залп КР по Сирии, когда более полусотни Томогавков вспахали пустыню или упали в море. А ведь там работало только локальная система РЭБ, с небольшой зоной покрытия. Так что все это годится только в стрельбе по банановым республикам с отсталой ПВО и РЭБ. Калибр в этом плане куда более помехоустойчив, да и отставание США в области РЭБ стало почти критическим, лет 20-25 минимум. Они эту тему как то прошляпили в свое время. К тому же у нас не делается упора на работу КР по защищенным объектам, прикрытым ПВО - и Томогавк, и Калибр довольно простая мало скоростная цель. Для серьезной работы есть семейство ракет серии Х, которые ПВО США перехватить вообще не в состоянии даже технически.
@@four-dimensionalperson российские ракеты серии Х никогда не поставлялись на экспорт. Это новейшие изделия, по которым даже точные ТТХ не озвучены. Иран стрелял ракетами собственной разработки, и кроме буквенного индекса, ничего общего они не имеют. Это изделие базируется еще на советской разработке 70-х годов. Да и иранцы те еще "стрелки". Если бы наш бомбардировщик отстрелял этими ракетами по американским кораблям, они бы гарантированно были уничтожены. "Иджис" на их крейсерах и эсминцах не в состоянии отработать по таким целям, а бортовые РЭБ там слишком устаревшие, что бы повлиять на ситуацию.
@@gerkon3289 какие "новейшие" , вся Х серия разработана ещё во времена совка , всё всем давно известно и на экспорт поставлялись и Ирану и в Сирии и Ираку и в Китай и в Индию п
@@four-dimensionalperson да вы че) давно Х-101 поставляется на экспорт?) и работы над ней начались уже после Союза, в 1995. А фактически изделие поставлено на вооружение в 21 веке. Вы наверное путаете с Х-55/65. Та штука да, довольно старая. И шумеры в свое время продали часть своего запаса, в т.ч в Иран. А по 101 изделию вы никакой инфы не найдете, кроме глупостей в Википедии и откровений диванных экспертов на топвар). Там и дальности другие, и алгоритмы наведения, и помехоустойчивость, и заметность.
once fire is doesn’t need to looting around as it only stay in the air within 15-30 mins…so kaliber is longer range and pack more punch and cheaper to build. yes maybe true that tomahawk has been in more combat that because usa been in so many war and invade so many country and not let them sort out their own civil internal affair but all kaliber missile hit all there target with greater distances when it first appear without failing which mean is have seen more upgrade now also.
@@oleof635 lmfao keep up that russian bullshit propaganda. First of the Kaliber has never been tested as an anti-ship missile where as the Tomahawk has, 2 the Kaliber has been proven to be very weak against radar jamming which makes it very vulnerable and 3 considering that the kaliber is supposed to be a hypersonic style missile, for it make any course corrections it would literally have to slow down to subsonic thrust which then makes it vulnerable to anti-missile batteries. By the way if I am not mistaken the Moskva is supposed to carry the naval version of the Kaliber as an anti missile, anti-ship missile system and yet the Moskva was sunk by a 15 year old Ukrainian built subsonic missile system called the Neptune. Yea keep up your bullshit you'll soon realize how worthless the Russian military is. Right now the only serious threat Russia has against any country are their Nuclear missiles.
just such a thing, similar to a tomahawk, flew into the Pentagon on September 11 - there was no plane, the engines remain from the plane - they are made of titanium and will not burn out so easily - and it’s interesting - until September 11, 2001, America had a surplus budget - and after 11 September - only a deficit budget .. already 22 years old - think about this "coincidence"
Kalibr doesn't have a data link says it all to me. I am still looking for a comparison between Russian smartphone and iPhone but Russia didn't publish any data so I assume that Russian phone is superior.
@@aleksmiller1579 опускают только щирых и их недострану. А на военные объекты РФ не тож то бы нападать, А даже посмотреть в их сторону боятся ваши сутенёры.
Пуск был произведён 64 ракетами. 5 штук не вышли из шахт установки. 28 штук "зацепили" радиус Борисоглебска в Хмеймим и "лягли", 8 потерялись, 23 долетели до района цели, 20 не смогли найти цель и 13 из них самоликвидировались, а 7 упали вне района цели выработав топливо, цель смогли найти 3. Одна повредила разобранный на запчасти самолёт-донор, вторая попала в поле, третья повредила столовую. Никто не пострадал, ВПП, ДП и приводные радары не повреждены - аэродром продолжил работу в штатном режиме. Но 4,7% попаданий - это уже достижение! Хоть вообще попали примерно куда целились! (плюс минус пару километров... ;-) )
Im glad you mentioned the Merrill. I was on that ship during that time. I was a sonar operator and watched the launch - and many others - on cctv in the CIC. They didn't work well in the beginning. The jet wouldn't light, etc. This has brought back memories for me. I got old, but I was there..right there.
The most powerful is the missile that successfully delivers the warhead straight to the target. The loitering and damage assessment ability of Tomahawk is somehow puzzling. Any cruise missile looks heavy and has tiny wings - it must have a huge turning radius, many miles across, how can it successfully loiter and strike on command?
I don't know. I thought the same as you, plus the fact that it is rocket powered, so how can it carry enough fuel to hang around an area? I am confused. Cheers
Well there's a story somewhere in internet that tomahawk is being jam by Russia when the US Navy fire it in Syria.... This video is misleading a bit in my opinion 🤔🙃
Lol, russia air defense system are junk it cant hit a shit when israeli destroy the Syrian russian made AA defense battery equipped with their new pantsir and s300 and you think people wil believe russian propaganda Get your facts right
@@Slycarlo get your facts straight those were old air defense battery systems when Russia deployed there latest air defense, there prime minister went to Moscow to meet Putin about deconflicting channels
Russia has already developed such systems and uses them in its armmii. The United States is 15-20 years behind in this regard. By the time the US reaches such technologies, Russia will have made a new technological breakthrough
@@Aleks_N77 Yup just like in Ukraine they burned through all there drones and are using off the shelf components to make up for it. except not (no real time telemetry etc.)
Still the fastest missile is the U.S. Minuteman III, which reaches hyper sonic speeds of Mach 28.2 (28,200kph). Comparing the Tomahawk, a missile from the 80s, with the Kalibr which just saw the light in 2012. Not a real good comparison.
Well, if it's just the range, that is a drawback of Tomahawk - boosting that shouldn't be a problem! Upgrading everything else (which is already better than the other hardware around, including Kalibr, would be way harder! Hell, frankly I'd love the tech from a Tomahawk (no, I don't mean the explosive warhead, I mean the datalink, camera, computer and nav-system!) to play around with :D
The Mk II nuclear version has a 1350nmi range just by virtue of the 290lb W80 nuclear warhead versus that standard 1000lb warhead. The Williams F107-WR-402 700 lbf (3.1 kN) engine is quite old now and could likely be improved by 20%-30% in fuel burn. If the 1000lb warhead of the 899nmi range Mk V were replaced by a 500lb harpoon warhead and 500lbs extra fuel carried we would see 1.25 hours extra full speed cruise so about 500nmi extra so about 1400nmi range (2600km) or 1600 miles. With a new engine maybe should get to 2000 miles. The long range versions of Kalibr achieve their extra range by being much heavier than Tomahawk. So we can get 50% more range by going for a 500lb warhead, 20% more range by a new modern jet engine and 70% if both or implemented.
Well, on April 14 2018, 70% of Missiles launched at Syria were intercepted or safely landed as one Tomahawk. As for Kalibr, you can ask your Proxy Army how effective it is.
@@mufasaf128 The Zircon missile reaches a speed of 11,200 km / h and carries a nuclear payload and cannot be detected by any air radar or anti-ground defense shield such as the Deveselul shield in Romania.
The tomahawk missile tasting in Panama conflict in Central America, this missile in the beginning has so much trouble when fired they fell in residential areas killing many civilians , the US government payments to silence this incident and thus not disappoint your military industrial complex.
"«Калибр» Эта девятиметровая крылатая ракета взлетела на высоту до 900 километров" 900 км высоты это высота полета спутника!!! Высота пуска (для ракеты 3М-14АЭ): 500 - 11000 метров или 0,5-11 километров!!! Дизлайк!
Amarica may be slightly better in airplane manufacturing but when comes to mesile, specifically crouse mesile, Amarica is nowhere near to Russia. Actually Amarican was westing time in publicity and making money from it but russian make more real stuff with relatively low cost and resources, which is now making knockout kick for Americans. Sorry, but I just said truth. Because truth is truth.
Я не специалист, но могу сказать что у любой ракеты есть модернизационный потенциал. Томагавк конечно староват, но и платформ для запуска калибров не так много... Так что пока говорить о превосходительстве рано.
US$195,000 What can a Black Hornet drone do? th-cam.com/video/9IkaP6XMNZw/w-d-xo.html
А война в Украине как раз по причине тамогавков. С территории Украины можно поражать цели в центральной России. Договориться не получилось .Вот и результат.А какая сильнее нет смысла сравнивать.И та и другая убивает а не щекочет.
@@ЕвгенийКурдынко Ты кретин.
Если не в курсе, согласно договоренностям между США и РФ ракеты малой и средней дальности (наземного базирования) не могут распологаться в Европе, морского можно, а подходящих морских носителей у Украины нет))) Р.С. ракеты могут появиться не только на Украине но и на Кубе или у Ирана
@@zaczac1934 Согласно договоренности и Украина имела нейтральный статус.Только договоренности все летят в попу. Не так ли? Покажи хоть один договор который не нарушен? Борьба с терроризмом обернулась террором.И покрывается ООН.Не странно ли?
Калибры уже летают на Украине каждый день, а Томагавки ржавеют в США🤣🤣🤣
One correction. Kalibr doesn’t use GPS for navigation, it uses Glonass. It’s a stupid idea for RU military to use GPS.
Right 😉
Yes because the United States can turn it off they own most of the GPS satellites in the world
@@jacoblongbrake8230 no, its because gps jamming is common play these days.
@@Diggles666 ooh ookay..
He meant GNSS (Global Nation Satellite Systems).
Actually, Russia has always had cruise missiles since cold war.
Yeah i dont get where they got this "Russia didnt have Cruise missile before kalibr". They literally had best Anti-Ship cruise missiles in the world P-500 Bazalt(1963) and P-700 Granit(1985). Both having really advanced guidance system where missiles work together to target different ships and only having having to pop op for target scan.
Then there are P-270 Moskit,RK-55 and SS-N-3 Shaddock last one being from 1959.
USSR developed it, modern Russia is still relying on soviet technology
@@fraerok01 Russia is still the Soviet Union, even contrary to the opinion of Putin and our anti-Soviet elite. For a long time the Americans referred to the USSR as "Soviet Russia", now they call it "Modern" Russia.
Russia doesn't go around the world bombing countries...that's why most haven't seen their capabilities.
@@Sarfanger target scan by its active seeker??
I wonder, who's going to tell authors of video, that Soviet union had TWO such missiles, from different lineups and design bureaus, since 80s as well? Kh-55 and S-10.
That's what I thought too.
Actually, the 'author' of the video is not even the author. He has just blatantly stolen the info he uses in the video above from an article from Naval Post called 'Which cruise missile is more powerful, Tomahawk or Kalibr?'. He should keep his fingers crossed that the original author doesn't find out about that.
Hes a pro American propagandist.
Piotr
Did anyone told you, Russian rusted tank's the keep burning in Ukraine like pile of wood's
They were not that good so no point boasting about them.
>1:42 Until 2015, it was thought that only the USA and Britain had this capability
1958 The Raduga KSR-2 fitted with a one-megaton nuclear warhead
1962 The Raduga KSR-5 supersonic, fitted with a 350kt nuclear warhead
1962 KSR-11
1961 K-10S supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead
1960 Kh-20 supersonic, fitted with nuclear warhead
1960 P-15 Termit
1968 Kh-22 supersonic, fitted with 1Mt thermonuclear warhead
1968 P-70 Ametist
1983 Kh-55
198? Kh-101
1984 P-270 Moskit
Legend says it is still thought so to this day.
They are mostly anti ship missiles or land based missiles based on anti ship missies therefore they are not much useful against land based targets....... tomahawk was specially designed to engaged long range land based targets.
@@DipakkrSaha "Mostly" is quite not the same as "no at all".
@@xfxox See, here you gave example of p 15 missile which is soley used for anti shipping purpose and shore based targets to some extent(by limited land attack, I meant attacking shores only) . For precised deep strikes, you need capabilities like TERCOM which is absent in those missiles.
@@xfxox I like this.
@@DipakkrSaha I see you are very good in this field of knowledge. Could you tell me the range of the best American cruise missile in 1958? And could you tell me " FOR WTF TERCOME you talked about in 1958 ?!?!?!
Or you speak just to have "BLA BLA" comments here ?!?!?!?
Russia has a different usage doctrine from the US so direct comparison are hard to make. However, the Russian approach has proven interesting and cost effective.
В СИРИИ ТАМАГАВК ПОКАЗАЛ СЕБЯ.ДВА ЭКЗЕМПЛЯРА ПОПАЛИ В РОССИЙСКИЙ НАУЧНЫЙ ЦЕНТР ДЛЯ ЕГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ.ЕГО ПАРАМЕТРОВ .А ВОТ КАЛИБР БЬЁТ С ТОЧНОСТЬЮ ДО МИЛЛИМЕТРА.А ДАЛЬНОСТЬ ЕЁ ПОЛЁТА СОСТАВЛЯЕТ БОЛЕЕ 2000 КМ А НЕ 1500 А ЕЩЁ ОНА СПОСОБНА НЕСТИ ЯДЕРНУЮ БОЕГОЛОВОКУС САМОНАВЕДЕНИЕМ.НИ ОДИН РАДАР НЕ МОЖЕТ ЕЁ ЗАСЕЧЬ ЕЁ МОГУТ ОБНОРУЖИТЬ ЛИШЬ ПРИ ПОДЛЁТЕ К ЦЕЛИ НУ КОНЕЧНО УЖЕ НИЧТО НЕ ПОМОЖЕТ ОТ ЕЁ УДАРА В ТАКИХ УСЛОВИЯХ. КРОМЕ ОНИ МОГУТ РАБОТАТЬ В КОМАНДЕ И ПЕРЕДАВАТЬ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ ДРУГ ДРУГУ ЧЕМ НЕ МОЖЕТ ПОХВАЛИТЬСЯ АМЕРИКАНСКИЙ ТАМАГАВК .ВЫ АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ВСЕГДА ПРИНИЖАЕТЕ РОЛЬ ЧУЖИХ РАЗРАБОТКАХ ТАМАГАВК ЭТО РАКЕТА ПРОШЛОГО СТОЛЕТИЯ А РАКЕТА КАЛИБР ЭТО РАКЕТА НОВОГО ПОКОЛЕНИЕ И НЕ НАДО УТВЕРЖДАТЬ ЧТО ОНИ ОДНОГО ПАРАМЕТРА.ЭТО СОВСЕМ РАЗНЫЕ ПО СВОЕМУ СТРОЕНИЮ .У РОССИИ ЕСТЬ ЕЩЁ ОДНА РАКЕТА НА ЯДЕРНОМ ТОПЛИВЕ ЭТО БУРЯВЕСТНИК. ОНА МОЖЕТ НАХОДИТСЯ НЕСКОЛЬКО СУТОК В НЕБЕ ТО ЕСТЬ УДАРИТЬ ТОГДА КОГДА ЭТОГО НЕ ОЖИДАЕТ ПРОТИВНИК ТАК У РОССИ НЕ ОДИН АРСЕНАЛ А МНОЖЕСТВО.ЧЕГО НЕТ У США И ЕЕ СОЮЗНИКОВ..КСТАТИ ЭТИ РАКЕТЫ МОГУТ ДОЛЕТЕТЬ НАПРИМЕР ДО ЕВРОПЫ ЗА ПЯТЬ МИНУТ ИЗ АКВАТОРИИ ЧЁРНОГО МОРЯ. НУ А ЕСЛИ ОНИ УДАРЯТ КАЛИБРАМИ НАПРИМЕР НА ДАЛЬНЕМ ВОСТОКЕ ПО США ГДЕ РОСТОЯНИЕ ДО США ВСЕГО ЛИШЬ 83 КМ ТО БУДЕТ ДОРОГО СТОИТЬ США .У РОССИИ ВСЁ ЕСТЬ ВСЕ ПРИРОДНЫЕ БОГАТСТВА НУ ПО ТЕРРИТОРИИ ОНА САМАЯ БОЛЬШАЯ ЧАСТЬ ПЛАНЕТЫ .И ЗЕМЛИ СВОЕЙ ХВАТАЕТ ТАК ЗАЧЕМ РОССИИ НА КАКОГО ТО НАПАДАТЬ .ВАС ВСЕХ ЗОМБИРУЮТ МНИМОЙ УГРОЗОЙ ДЛЯ СВОИХ ЦЕЛЕЙ ВАШИ ПРАВИТЕЛИ,ВАШИ ОЛИГАРХИ.И ВАШ НАРОД ВЕРЯТ В ЭТОТ БРЕД.АМЕРИКАНЦЫ ПОСМОТРИТЕ СОВЕТСКИЙ МУЛЬТФИЛЬМ КОТ ЛЕОПОЛЬД. ТАМ ОН ГОВОРИТ ДАВАЙТЕ ЖИТЬ ДРУЖНО В МИРЕ
@@АлександрЛебедев-в3о Красава....👍
@@АлександрЛебедев-в3о Молодчик! 👍⭐
It hasn't proven shit!
Россия мощь......
The russian weapon can do a supersonic sprint in the terminal phase; useful vs ships,etc
Also the YJ 18
Nope - only one variant.
It's basically attaching an extra booster, I bet similar modifications can be made without having to develop entire new missile.
@@abdiganiaden not possible for tomahawk. Vls is too small
Only for antiship variant. Also for much shorter range about 150-450km
Also the missile tip is different, rounded for cruise missiles variant and sharp cone for antiship variant.
The USSR also had cruise missiles analogous to the tamahawk, which were put into service back in 1984, and they had been developing them since 1975, but their states were asked to remove them from the agreement on medium-range missiles. The name of this missile is S-10 "Granat" (URAV Navy Index: 3K10, according to NATO codification: SS-N-21 "SAMPSON").
The Caliber missiles are not really TAmagavk, this is a family of missiles of various ranges and purposes, including in the anti-ship missile version with a supersonic detachable missile with a warhead, and sea-based cruise missiles of the Granit type (URAV Navy Index: 3M45, according to NATO codifications: SS-N-19 "Shipwreck"), "Volcano" (Navy URAV Index (missiles): 3M70), (Navy URAV Index - 3M55, according to the classification of the US Department of Defense and NATO - SS-N-26 Strobile), May hit also on earthly targets in the depths.
And METIORITE - 1
Ты ещё чертежи скинь
Russia developed many cruise missiles in a span of 5-10 years, Kalibr is just one of them. P-800 Oniks, Indian Brahmos, the deadliest : Zicron and the future P-900 Alfa and Brahmos 2.
The Kalibr-M is like a hybrid of zicron and Kalibr since it is also hypersonic nature.
I didn't get why talk about obsolete tech? Doesn't US have something more advanced such as Russian Avangard or Sarmat?
@Chano Leyva Missiles arent really that expensive you know, at most a single one may cost just around 1 million, and even less since its Russian system not a US one.
The kalibr-M is not hypersonic, i dont know where you get this.
Its a regular kalibr missile with conformal fuel tanks to extend its range, just like the k-55 with conformal tanks.
@Chano Leyva ahh yes the good old, we keep our stuff secret story.
Isnt the US one of the most open countries in regards to weapon development. Yes it is. In fact its less then a month ago when the US reported its hypersonic strike weapon just failed for the third time during testing.
Meanwhile its actually Russia and China that keep most of the details about their programs secret.
@@LodewijkVrije Russia is also open about their development, don't we know the performance of Su-57? Yes we do, while u are correct with China.
It's telling that the Americans were adamant that Russian claims of hacking and re-targetting tomahawk cruise missiles in Syria were propaganda then the block V comes out in 2021 with the main upgrade is making them harder to hack.
lmao, source on that please xD
Whichever has better tech to evade missiles defense and EW countermeasures will win.
Yes there is no evidence these hit their targets, and Russia showed off undetonated missiles they took down. Yet this video claims the aging tomahawk has better ew resistance. If that's true than Russian ew is way ahead of us.
@Varangian Guard Yes I remember that ... that was the one where the USA claimed that 20 + tomahawks were used to destroy an unhardened low rise university building.
@ $2 million/ea for the missiles + the cost keeping a fleet of ships in the Mediterranean ... I would have done the job for $250K using 2 excavators and I would have left them with a nice clean site ... the superstructure was still standing after the strike.
Either Tomahawk missiles are extremely smart and won't damage anything they aren't supposed to ... or they are complete crap ... or one or two tomahawks hit the site and the rest were disabled.
@@evo3s75 rt sputnik and tucker carlson
To the question: “what is better in terms of price and quality”? - My accountant always asks: "Chief, are we selling or buying?"
Пожалуй сделаю скриншот
Zirkon is in mass production, that changed the whole game.
Thank you comrad Taylor.
It's interesting that the United States always understates the performance of its weapons while the Russians overstate the performance of theirs
@@jamesricker3997 Lol not really. Counterpoint: A10 Warthog. Everybody's favorite but look just a little deeper. . .
@@jamesricker3997 So the American Patriot air defense system is much superior to the S-400 air defense system. Clear. Thank you friend, I am glad to know that Russian weapons can be compared exclusively only against Somali.
@@jamesricker3997 Вообще наоборот. Это США всегда указывают чуть больше, а русские чуть меньше. Пример Калибр, Кода 30 лет все думали, что его дальность 350 км, итог потвержденных стрельб на 1600
The Russians are very well able to jam Tomahawk missiles. They delivered proof in Syria. The US is not able to jam Kalibr missiles, so jut do the math? Kalibr wins on all fronts.
Out of 180 cruise missiles more than half still made it to their target in Syria… pucker factor and the USA can afford it
Where will you be if there's a war?
They can now send Tomahawks back by manipulate internal gps.
You can jam Kalibr navigation satellites just as easy as tomahawks, also a lot fewer Kalibr and a whole lot fewer launching platforms for its so do the actual math! Tom>Kal!
It's okay the United States has laser weapon platforms that can destroy the missiles they just put them on their C-130 they're f-22s A-10 and F-35
What's crazy, is that for less money, our opponents are able to outrange our missiles while able to go as fast or even faster and deliver the same or more payload for cheaper. Just astounding.
porque es un negocio de exprimir los tributos públicos....
The first time I knew the cost of Tomahawk missile was during the US mission in Libya (vs Moamer Gaddafi). 1 million usd per missile, there goes my dads tax 😭😭😭
Russians and Chinese working on the development and production of weapons are likely paid 10 times less than Americans. Also the sector is owned by the government so they don't use private corporations to make astronomical profits at the expense of tax payers.
@@starchild692 oh yeah I read it once that weapon factories like "United Aircraft Corporation" (the merging body of Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Tupolev, etc) is owned by the government. I think that explains why Russian price on developing-producing the cruise missiles is cheaper compared to US
In Yugoslavia we shut down more then 500 tomahawk missiles
The accuracy of the CALIBR is very good. All Ukrainian military installations were destroyed on the first day of the invasion.
🤣 Yeah thats why theyre still getting owned
@@theoverseer3527 yeah, in your dreams
@@kskuroku putin is the most stupid leader in Russia History
Crazy how those military installations fire back still. Even if that were the case, the Russians will figure out where the phrase "why are the threes speaking Vietnamese" comes from. Now they speak Ukrainian with Javelins and NLAWs.
@@duyvn9 I'm glad to listen an opinion of the smartest expert in this field
Как то очень скромно автор умолчал о залпе по Сирии сотней топоров из которых семьдесят не долетели до цели. Многие упали по непонятным причинам. Это об устойчивости ракеты к воздействию РЭБ.
К тому же Калибр развивает скорость до 2.5 маха.
А топор дозвуковой.
Сравнение:
XXI век и XX.
Больше телевизор смотри
@@Hugo_Stiglitz_1
Алекс! У тебя есть другие данные?
Если нет, то сопи в две дырки)
@@ЮрийКим-ф6х о запуске калибров вообще нет данных. По твоей логике этих запусков вообще небыло?
@@Hugo_Stiglitz_1
А какие данные тебе нужны?
Известно, что долетает с Каспийского моря до Средиземного, а с Черного до Львова.
Номенклатуры экспортных ракет(в урезанном по ТТХ характеристикам) в открытом доступе. Википедия может помочь. Более десяти вариантов.
2.5 маха - это Брамос, а не калибр 3м14. Калибр почти равен томагавку, но имеет большую дальность
rosjanie zakłócili tor lotu rakiet Tomahawk w syrii tak że w nic nie trafiły a amerykanie wystrzelili ponad 70 pocisków, są one obecnie uważane za przestarzałe i są modernizowane na zakłócenia elektromagnetyczne generowane przez rosjan
Elektromagnetische Technik sind die Russen den Amerikaner Jahrzehnte voraus.
I don't the remember where I read the article but is more or less as follows: During Dessert Storm the first 200 cruise missiles were declared "obsolete" and the loss expected was 50%, only two crashed, other two were shoot down by AAA. Effective rate of 98%. Even the military officials were "frozen" with the result.
And when the Russia Defense Minister declared that they had shot down 71 of the 105 cruise missiles fired by Trump, France and UK it was found that almost all missiles found their target. (once crashed a launch) That was confirmed by craters from satellite imagery. They also claimed they jammed the rest. Nothing the Russians say about their weapons is accurate. Tomahawk is affordable and reliable. The Mk II version has 1350nmi range (about 2400km). If The USN wanted to it could increase range so it could continue using the same missile from the same launch cells simply by fitting a modern Turbofan engine. similar to the Mk II. It seems the USN has other ideas.
@@williamzk9083 I wouldn't stake my life on what the West says about foreign weapons should I be stationed in an airfield.
@@Tattlebot
US weapons are tried and tested and they take years to develop because the testing process is so complex. And when the weapons are in service they work.
You say you would not stake your life on them well they took out the Syria base that launched chemical attacks.
@@bighands69 that's not true. For example, HARM has a dismal record against second and third rate adversaries in Serbia and Iraq. Harpoon, HARM, and Tomahawk are just too slow. The probability of interception by a serious adversary like Russia or China is very high. The US tries to create a Tom Clancy perception of their military capability while in real life, many systems are not fit for purpose.
@@bighands69that's absolutely not true....many American weapons are unreliable or hard to maintain.
Убойный аргумент; "не знаем ТТХ "Калибров", поэтому "Томагавки" лучше". Только вот факты говорят обратное. Особенно про высокую точность и не восприимчивость к помехам. И про "засекреченность" результатов массового применения калибров в Сирии ложь. Только из утюгов и домофонов не транслировали кадры поражения целей и результат был превосходный; все долетели и попали в цель
Так называемый "калибр" это та же старая Советская ракета С-10 "Гранат" .,,чего же здесь неизвестного ??? Или ты думаешь что в нищей отсталой Раше где даже телевизор с телефоном не в состоянии собрать, за 30 лет вставания с колен что то новое изобрели ??? Совковая ракета С-10 ... плавным движением языка русских "изобретателей" вдруг стала "кОлибром"🤣 а Совковая С-300 стал С-400 и 500, Т-72 обозвали в Т-90 а ракету ОТРК "Искандер " вдруг стали обзывать и Цирконом и даже Кинжалом, и не важно что их у Рашки нет ни в ВВС ни на ржавом флоте.Понты у голодных и нищих русских, это самое важное.
🤣🤣 все что рашка предоставила .,,это один и тот же кадр, как некое мини - корыто из Каспийского болота, выпускает ракету ....ни о каких 24 ракетах нет информации а так же КУДА и как они угодили, и был ли вообще пуск !?? Пуск 59 ТОМОГАВКОВ ты и сейчас найдёшь.....особенно по кадрам разбомбленой базы "Швйрат" ... а Рашка куда пульнула ??? По ПРОПАГАНДЕ Раши ??!🤣🤣🤣
По данным спутниковой разведки Израиля, уничтожены 44 цели, в 10 из них по несколько прпаданий. А в Рашке чтоб завуалиррвать свой позор ,стали тявкать и скулить ... "Акела промахнуося,Акела промахнулся" ..., потом в Рашке выдумали новую сказку..,из 59 ТОМОГАВКОВ 36 Рашка "сбила" и даже угрожали предоставить " штабе из сбитый ТОМОГАВК"....потом пропаганда поняв что облажались (ПВО Раши молчали как мыши под веником) выдумали новую сказку ...,де все ТОМОГАВКИ Рашка отвела от целей неким старым допотопным РЭБ,но почему то этот РЭБ ещё ни разу не спас самолёты и вертолеты Рашки в Сирии ....а их Раша потеряла в Сирии аж 16 единиц !! Но самое смешное ,что Рашка не показывала своему быдло народу кадры ...от того что осталось от базы Шайрат, но мы то их видели, поэтому и всегда смеёмся над жалким потугами голодной России.
@@aleksmiller1579твои высеры ярчайшее подтверждение тому, что у МО получилось
@@НиколайКичигин-б7о Ага,поэтому 7 год а Сирии нет,есть лишь Анклавы контролируемые США, Турцией,Израилем и Ираном- Асадом, у которых Раша на подхвате.И чего же там у Раши "всё получилось" ??? Удержать мёртвого Асада у власти !?? Поэтому ваш карлик Путин все время бегал к нашей Меркель и клянчил деньги на Сирию....читай Асада !? Не смеши Ваня ,я знаю что русские глупы на генном уровне,поэтому русские живут в Германии по 17 лет,а язык выучить не в силах,но от русских есть и польза в Германии,моют наши общественные туалеты на Аутохоф Германии.Хоть на это вы годны ,к тому же зарплата русского санитара мойщика туалетов в Германии ...от 1.400 евро в месяц ( вашими деревянными рублями ,где то 120 .000 руб? ) такие зарплаты у руских лишь на крайнем севере в нефтегазовой отрасли)🤣👍 а ты продолжай меня веселить русскими сказками.Так чо там у Раши в Сирии получилось то ??? Самый нефтегазовой регион Сирии в руках США и Курдов, а именно Раша сама ничего не контролирует,лишь на подхваие у Ирана и их марионетки Асада.
I hope advantages and capabilities of both missiles on real targets will not be tested in next months.
I fuckin hope they do...m
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Caribbean crisis 2.0: See you soon boys 😉
nah! Russia doesn't want war only the US wants war.
@@0farmerjohn0 Yep
I hadn't watched the video, gonna watch later. But if we are not being biased then I believe everyone who has knowledge know that generally Russia has more powerful missiles.
Kaliber is faster and with longer ranges , both are accurate with targets , this point is not a problem for huge super powers , both have advaced navigation systems .
The real range the tomahawk is greater than the official figures
United States never releases accurate numbers for its active weapon systems
@@jamesricker3997 wasn’t it the standard in military? All country never releases real figures(usually more than 50% boost compared to announced figures)
@@jamesricker3997 during 2017 attacks in Syria, Syrian sam systems managed to shot down 90% of tomahawks missiles fired, and we are talking about old soviet sam systems. Modern russian built sam systems can easily defeats any tomahaks attack. Like the us patriot sam systems the tomahawk is a faillure.
@@mcbmcb5163 Yep, the US military tech is growing older with each passing day. Russia and China are already ahead of them in most of the cases. Compared with what the US has, Chinese destroyers are superior, Both the Chinese and Russian missiles are better, Russian tanks are better and the advantage the US had with its 5th gen aircraft is quickly eroding. Especially considering F-35, aka the 'Flying Coffin', constant failures.
@@mcbmcb5163 that's Russian propaganda lol, unless that 90% can be independently verified, the 2017 attacks was a success. Anyways the Tomahawk is a subsonic missile, shooting it down is pretty easy regardless
In Syria:
Tomahawk: 109 pieces for 3 targets = not 100% efficient.
Kalibr: 24 pieces for 12 targets = 100% efficient.
@snsproduc lol it happened once and it was air defence missiles not cruise missiles 🤦♂️🤦♂️
@snsproduc that video was uploaded weeks earlier than the one you saw on TH-cam. And it was uploaded by Ukrainians.
@snsproduc probably you were watching anti-air missle launches, targeted to intercept the cruise missiles and failed hitting randomly ground targets. that's a common case this war
Russia has advanced significantly and much further than the United States in the field of electronic warfare. Do you really think that the Caliber cruise missile does not have excellent EW defense and countermeasure capabilities? You are naive..
Пусть считают!
Totally agree with you..I don't compare Kalibr to tomahawk..tomahawk can be easily destroyed by air defense systems while it is cruising due to the subsonic speed..Kalibr has mach 3 speed in other words hypersonic speed and it is not easy to be destroyed while it is cruising...
How "Russia has advanced significantly and much further than the United States in the field of electronic warfare" prove it! American processor technology is at least 20 years ahead of Russia and that is only the commercially available technology.
@@napobg6842 результат превосходства рассийских средств РЭБ это количество не попавших в цель томагавков в Сирии . практически все мимо за редким исключением.
Whatt 🤣🤣
First of all....France also has cruise missile . It's the MdCN, the naval version of Scalp missile.
Second....Russia use the GLOSNAS system.Not the GPS.
They also forget about Soviet S-10
GLONASS and GPS are basically the same but names
@@timookello3822 no they are totally independent to each other
@@Stephano.MBravo1 I guess I didn't make a proper distinction between the two...both are used for global position and navigation but produced by different countries.
Glonase and gps are the same thing.
A Toyota and a Nissan are the same thing... both are vehicles made by different companies.
@@timookello3822 so me and you we are the same thing? Just born from different moms in different countries but still we are clones....!???? Are u listening to yourself?🤣🤣🤣🤣
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
?
In essence, it finishes where it started 😂
you madlad xD
Nice one mAh dude
wtf
Now you can see how Kalibr works in real videos
or rather their pathetic performance
@@napobg6842 pathetic? They f*cking blew up military bases like nothing bro .
@@napobg6842 по тебе прилетит будешь сам жалкий
@@CJ-52 You know I'm not gonna even bother translating your comment.
@@napobg6842 Google translate 🤣
The events in Ukraine have shown that the Caliber has a very powerful jamming system on board, there is a video. in which two missiles of the Ukrainian S-300 system fly past the Caliber missile, ignoring it. Of course, Ukraine has old S-300 systems, but the oldest S-300 is more perfect than the newest Patriot complex
Supersonic terminal of Kaliber is a big difference
You should ask ukrainians about Kalibr accuracy. This people have answer for all question asked ever.
Kalibr destroyed 100% military targets in Ukraine , this missle is really unstoppable
Kacap?
@Zamhoidn Landshut
These are Ukrainian artillery, tanks and armored vehicles that are preparing to "defend Ukraine from Russian aggression." Although, they are placed in cities right in the middle of residential buildings, so any retaliatory strike will lead to the mass death of civilian Ukrainians, but who cares? The outstanding democratic leader Zelensky does not care at all about this, so the terrible evil tyrant Putin will have to think about it.
Uraaaaaaa🇮🇩🇷🇺🇮🇩🇷🇺🇮🇩🇷🇺🇮🇩🇷🇺
We need to give Ukraine the Patriot missile defense system and then no more Kalibr missiles would make it to Ukrainian targets- like hospitals and schools……
@@sporty22011 Patriot missile defense system sucks
Well, when you bombed half of the world, you definitely see your missiles in combat operations.
There's no arguing, the Kalibr missile is better in everything.
Kalibr is definitely better at hitting apartment blocks but nothing else
@@napobg6842 Copium
En el ataque a shairat quedo muy claro que el tomahawk por mas que lo modernicen es obsoleto a sistemas de interferencias e interceptacion. Por otro lado su historial de fallos a causado muchas disculpas por su capacidad de atacar blancos civiles como hospitales y centros de cruz roja.
Lo viste en rt
Si, lo viste en RT (Russian TV) 😆
@@maurysevilla3825 Solo las mentiras occidentales son las ciertas? no hay mas ciego que aquel que no quiere ver
Entonces se puede decir que nada es cierto
@@maurysevilla3825 siga viendo películas de hollywood donde EEUU siempre gana y tiene la mejor tecnología
Kalibr has proven itself when it come down to accuracy and speed
Tomahawk have high failure rate . in 2001 when USA fire them on Afghanistan the were flying over pakistan where about Dozen fall inside pakistan and which pakistan reverse engineered and made Babur cruise missile from it , which have range of about 800 km
Not sure about that but It has gone through 4 revisions form block 1 it is much more resilient now
"Невероятную" точность томагавка видел весь мир в Сирии, когда половина ракет улетело вообще в неизвестном направлении, а остальные взорвали пару ненужных сараев. Охренненая точность.
Ну это же Омерика. У них и промах , не промах, а так работаем по площадям.
C названием ошиблись ... половина каклибров даже до Сирии не долетела :)
@@AB-se4hl скоро вы на себе убедитесь в точности калибров
@@AB-se4hl это ты про тамагавки которые в Сирии при трампе выпустили а мы их заглушили и более менее рабочие в москву на освоение увезли
@@магазинпродуктов ну вам то с магазина 100% виднее
Что теперь скажешь на счёт точности калибра ?
Не точнее Нептуна 👌
@@Sailren серьезно?
Tomahawks were not that effective in Iran. Half lost the other made minor damage. But the cost of that operation was huge
Iraq, not Iran.
@@timookello3822 ash-shayrat Siria to be eactly 😁
Well since we never used any in Iran I will say you made that up.
I just ordered 5 kalibr and 3 tomahawk from Amazon to compare, ill be back.
Can you please compare stuff using the same unit of measures eater miles or kilometers
Do math buddy. 1.6 kilometres to the mile
@@YaMomsOyster Why should he make math, the whole world, and the whole scientific community is using the metric system, that is, in fact, logical, not yards, feet, inches, pounds...
@@YaMomsOyster есть ещё морская миля 1,8 км, по этой причине просят использовать метрическую систему. Это позволяет избежать проблем.
Are those same Tomahawk missiles that was fired in Syria? What was the effectiveness against old Soviet air defense? 26%... Kalibr wins in many aspects.
LOL, yeah that's what the Russia's state controlled "RT network" told you. The satellite images release by the US prove that is a LIE! The missiles all hit their targets.
@@_Coffee4Closers satellite images from 🇺🇸...are those same satellites what told us about Iraqis Weapons of Mass Destruction? 😆 🤣
@@_Coffee4Closers You mean those satellite images which show a couple of craters on an airstrip of an airport, which were reportedly done by 100+ missiles?
@@_Coffee4Closers Сирия несколько почти неповрежденных показала томагавк
Не так все однозначно. И не такя уж и старая ПВО Сирии была в тот момент. Сами ракеты важны в ПВО, но основа это радар, а в небе над Сирией был тогда А-50. Такие машины очень хорошо с неба видят цели и отлично наводят ракеты. Да и да и новейшие Российские electronic warfare systems "Красуха" там были. Часть объектов всетаки были поражены, у Сирии ракет просто не хватило на всех.
Но в целом США в Сирии имели дело с старыми ракетами ПВО и новейшими радарами РФ.
Isn't the Kalibr cruise missile supersonic at the terminal phase while the tomahawk is sub-sonic? Isn't this a distinct advantage? So how is it not possible to make a complete comparison?
Yes it is and this video is based on a bias.
Нет калибр полностью дозвуковая ракета.... Но в ролике не сказано о том что калибр может, некоторых модификаций может ставить помехи вражеским РЛС. Плюс калибр летит намного ниже томагавка...
Shahed 136 joined the game
Both missiles capabilities almost identical, ranges gap can be easily fix together with other technical differences. What makes kalibr better was the production cost per missiles.
production cost is one thing but western countries generally are much richer and can buy more with lower % of their GDP
@@hphp31416 nuclear fusion will balance everyone.
tomahawk is outdated, kalibr is already upgraded to double it's range
I guess US 763 billion dollars of military spending beats Russian 62 billion every time and any small differences in capability pale when you buy 1000's more of a slightly inferior missile, if indeed it even is.
US GDP 21 Trillion Russia 1.4, smaller than Italy. Also top 20 tech companies in the world the majority are US. So any advances the the Kaliber may have will be quickly surpassed
"almost identical" is "Kalibr is x2.5 faster and/or have triple the range". Oh, Yes, and cost lesser. UMMERRYKA FACK YEH!
Russian missile does not have a racist name.
Lol
@@willl7780лошадь опять в Ютубе сидит😂😂😂😂😂
Thanks for the awesome uploads!
Our pleasure!
A Siria dispararon 111 misiles incluyendo más de 80 tomahawk, más de 80 fueron derribados y el resto explotaron perdidos en el fin de mundo!
Imagine if Tomahawk datalink being hijacked during mid-flight and then send them back to the shooter.
That's impossible 👎
How you gonna jam something that uses terrain to navigate? put a mountain in its way?
@@gyasiansa3358 Are you sure. Is the Tomahawk totally fire n forget? Any data two way system can be intercepted. Whether you can break through its firewalls and alter the data and base programming is a different thing.
You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets. Also bunch of them were landed by Russian, at which point it never detnanated and was taken apart
Why are so many people repeating this lie?
@@napobg6842 Can you elaborate on what specifically are you talking about?
@@TA-op3vn "You forgot to mention when US fired at Syrian airport, most of the tomahawks never made to its targets"! No need for me to elaborate on anything. When you are the one telling the lie you obviously know what am I talking about
@@napobg6842 the fact that he didn't respond is a clear sign of his guilt.
@@laknidubandara Obviously because it is one thing when he and people like him just talk and a whole other thing to prove it. Like there were video in the very same day in the morning showing the amount of damage. There are satellite images confirming the hits.
Correction:
Tomahawks arent dependent on GPS entirely.
They would refernce the terrain data with downloaded sattelite terrain data, to gauge position.
US aircraft and missiles have star trackers that can locate them to within 180m day or night and through cloud. That's how a trident would locate itself should the GPS satellite system be destroyed. Once over land a tomahawk can user its radar for terrain counter mapping and a camera for digital scene correlation. The accuracy won't be effected at all if GPS was lost.
Kalibr is supersonic rocket 1,2-3M, Tomahawk is subsonic 0,98M. Kalibr is protected from electromagnetic distortions, Tomahawk is not, witch is very important because Russians have very powerful jamming devises.
And yet the Russians aren’t able to destroy a single tomahawk missile in Syria with their S-400 xD
Ukrainians shoot down about half of all missiles shot at them, including Kalibr missiles. If Ukrainians had better anti-missile defenses, they'd probably shoot down all of them.
@@a0flj0 Although I am completely behind Ukraine in this bloody and unjustified war of destruction and aggression by Russia, I must say that this is nonsense. Ukraine, in my opinion, has launched a maximum of 5-20% of the missiles. Israel, for example, has one of the best defense systems in the world with the Irondome and also only manages just over half, but more than 80% of the missiles fired at cities. In such a large country as Ukraine with e.g. the Patriot PAC-3 system, maybe 40-50% would be possible. For important targets or cities like Kiev with good protection, maybe even more, close to 80%.
@@a0flj0 But this does not change the fact that Russian missiles are mostly dirty, especially because of the reliability of just 30-50%.
Нам преподаватель рассказывал, как он в 70-ые делал систему распознавания ландшафта по спутниковым снимкам, которая использовалась для запусков крылатых ракет.
Интиресно
Пока противник строит планы , мы меняем ландшафт местности в ручную …
Why do you keep randomly switching between miles and kilometers? Pick one and stick with it, or always give both.
Тамагавк медленная ракета на мем протяжении боевого полета. Колибр перед ударом набирает скорость несколько скоростей звука.
Kalibr is a successor of Kh-55/555.
Russian response is always cheaper and effective compared to US ones
Aha say that to the Russian in Ukraine. They ddidn't know that their missiles were effective
@@napobg6842 oh yeah that's why they have shot down around 100 Ukrainian planes
@@umeshchittirai Evidence?
@@napobg6842 his ass
Russia just shot them at Ukraine.
Yup... I came here to educate myself on what it is that I was watching. A lot of Russian equipment is outdated........ but from the videos I just watched on the Kalibr I would say this weapon is pretty good. Go watch. It was low, crazy fast, and looked like it hit its target to me.
Kalibr 🔥🔥
The video doesn't contain accurate information, none can beat Russia when it comes to weapon technology. Tomahawk is subsonic and kalibr is a supersonic missile, the video uploader chose to ignore. There is no comparison b/w Tomahawk and kalibr, comparing Subsonic and Supersonic missile.
Seems like there is a lot of room to electronically jam a tomahawk
This was actually very well prepared. It has given me new respect for the tomahawk. Sometimes it's better to stick to what works even if it's old.
And who said tomahhawks works? Only against third world nations without air defenses like Lybia and IRAQ. Kalibers are modern cruise missiles from 2012 , while Tomahacks are from the 80s..
Both have satatelite navigation , and both have ECM capabilies. there are different versions. Tomahwaks are subsonic.. While KALIBRS have super sonic version of them , 3x times faster than tomahawks. And Tomahawks range is about 1,200km while Kalibrs range is 2,600km. Is battle proven in the syrian war and now ukraine war ,have been able to hit with precision the most defended airspace in all europe and with more electronic warfare hostile environment. Kalibrs are combat proven way more than Tomahawks in Modern wars. Tomawaks is old tech ,and they not stealthy , and very easy to intercept.. look for Syrian cruise missiles strike by Trump.. about 95% of them intercepted /jammed or missed its target. Israel don't use them anymore. They have no choice to use tomawaks because they have a large inventory of them and need to be used. until they develop something new.
@@technoartfest8708 very true. America needs fifth generation cruise missiles with range and speed. In this area it lags not just the Russians, but also the Chinese , Europeans and Israelis. Even India outclasses America with it's brahmos. I just don't understand why America doesn't team up with Israel to produce world class missiles. Perhaps it's too proud. Israel just came out with the ice breaker. If America has any intelligence, it will try to get the technology of this missile before China does.
@@learnerm3120 Probably ,One of the big problems ,aside of Budget and cost , is the fact that US navy have about 50 to 60 arleigh burke class destroyers , that only compatible with Tomahawks. and also the fact that most of NATO ,their warships also use them and also because of the big inventory of tomawaks they have in storage. So building a new cruise missile means , they will also need to build a new destroyer class ,that can equip them. So is very expensive for US and NATO to switch to other cruise missiles ,without having warships that can use them.
@@technoartfest8708 It is an issue but not one that is insurmountable. For one , warships are not the only means of delivery. Secondly , warships can and do have different vertical launch systems. At least the Chinese design their new warships to be able to deliver missiles with different sizes. Third , holding yourself back because you have a bunch of 40 year old missiles you don't want to throw away could be a sign you are not ready for prime time.
@@technoartfest8708 Tomahawked have been continuously upgraded since introduced. Those Block Number and Mod numbers means something. Old usually means reliable and cheap.
Вопрос поставлен не корректно. Главное, что точнее и менее подвержено внешним воздействиям.
У Томогавка помехоустойчивость почти нулевая. А стреляют они в версии с обычным БЧ исключительно по данным GPS. Если ракета три раза не получает трек-отметку, она самоликвидируется, т.к. по алгоритму считается, что управление потеряно.
Постановка помех сигналу навигации делает их практически бесполезными. Что наглядно показал массовый залп КР по Сирии, когда более полусотни Томогавков вспахали пустыню или упали в море. А ведь там работало только локальная система РЭБ, с небольшой зоной покрытия.
Так что все это годится только в стрельбе по банановым республикам с отсталой ПВО и РЭБ.
Калибр в этом плане куда более помехоустойчив, да и отставание США в области РЭБ стало почти критическим, лет 20-25 минимум. Они эту тему как то прошляпили в свое время.
К тому же у нас не делается упора на работу КР по защищенным объектам, прикрытым ПВО - и Томогавк, и Калибр довольно простая мало скоростная цель. Для серьезной работы есть семейство ракет серии Х, которые ПВО США перехватить вообще не в состоянии даже технически.
По корабликам США иранцы пуляли ракетами серии Х , несколько сбили несколько погасили помехами и ушли под воду.
@@four-dimensionalperson российские ракеты серии Х никогда не поставлялись на экспорт. Это новейшие изделия, по которым даже точные ТТХ не озвучены. Иран стрелял ракетами собственной разработки, и кроме буквенного индекса, ничего общего они не имеют. Это изделие базируется еще на советской разработке 70-х годов. Да и иранцы те еще "стрелки".
Если бы наш бомбардировщик отстрелял этими ракетами по американским кораблям, они бы гарантированно были уничтожены. "Иджис" на их крейсерах и эсминцах не в состоянии отработать по таким целям, а бортовые РЭБ там слишком устаревшие, что бы повлиять на ситуацию.
@@gerkon3289 какие "новейшие" , вся Х серия разработана ещё во времена совка , всё всем давно известно и на экспорт поставлялись и Ирану и в Сирии и Ираку и в Китай и в Индию п
@@four-dimensionalperson да вы че) давно Х-101 поставляется на экспорт?) и работы над ней начались уже после Союза, в 1995. А фактически изделие поставлено на вооружение в 21 веке. Вы наверное путаете с Х-55/65. Та штука да, довольно старая. И шумеры в свое время продали часть своего запаса, в т.ч в Иран.
А по 101 изделию вы никакой инфы не найдете, кроме глупостей в Википедии и откровений диванных экспертов на топвар). Там и дальности другие, и алгоритмы наведения, и помехоустойчивость, и заметность.
@@gerkon3289 ну про х-101 это правильно , только она и в Россию она стоит на вооружение так же как Армата и Су-57 (только на бумаге )
once fire is doesn’t need to looting around as it only stay in the air within 15-30 mins…so kaliber is longer range and pack more punch and cheaper to build.
yes maybe true that tomahawk has been in more combat that because usa been in so many war and invade so many country and not let them sort out their own civil internal affair but all kaliber missile hit all there target with greater distances when it first appear without failing which mean is have seen more upgrade now also.
Also because of its on the fly reprogramming capabilities the Tomahawk is a very capable anti-ship missile
kaliber can work as anti ship missile two can change directions very fast with maneuvers to evade interception
@@oleof635 lmfao keep up that russian bullshit propaganda. First of the Kaliber has never been tested as an anti-ship missile where as the Tomahawk has, 2 the Kaliber has been proven to be very weak against radar jamming which makes it very vulnerable and 3 considering that the kaliber is supposed to be a hypersonic style missile, for it make any course corrections it would literally have to slow down to subsonic thrust which then makes it vulnerable to anti-missile batteries. By the way if I am not mistaken the Moskva is supposed to carry the naval version of the Kaliber as an anti missile, anti-ship missile system and yet the Moskva was sunk by a 15 year old Ukrainian built subsonic missile system called the Neptune. Yea keep up your bullshit you'll soon realize how worthless the Russian military is. Right now the only serious threat Russia has against any country are their Nuclear missiles.
kalibr is way way way better
kalibr if for the terrorist.
@@karedacompany3782 yes exactly, terrorists can expect kalibr cruise missiles to deliver retribution👍🤣
Russia is always the best 🇷🇺😘❤️
Not really same as US
Funny 😅
Russia has Kalibr since 1994 in operational service,, not 2015.
just such a thing, similar to a tomahawk, flew into the Pentagon on September 11 - there was no plane, the engines remain from the plane - they are made of titanium and will not burn out so easily - and it’s interesting - until September 11, 2001, America had a surplus budget - and after 11 September - only a deficit budget .. already 22 years old - think about this "coincidence"
Kalibr doesn't have a data link says it all to me. I am still looking for a comparison between Russian smartphone and iPhone but Russia didn't publish any data so I assume that Russian phone is superior.
At least we know that Russians always go faster than US, Tomahawk is still subsonic after 40 years of existence ...
Из 59 ракет Томохавг выпущенных с корабля Порт, в район долетело 23 ракеты, а в цель всего 3,ТРИ ракеты, всего три ракеты😂😂😂
Кстати капитан эсминца которая опустила Рашку и её С 400 а так же разхерячила базу ВВС Асада ...ЖЕНЩИНА !!! 🤣✌✌
@@aleksmiller1579 опускают только щирых и их недострану. А на военные объекты РФ не тож то бы нападать, А даже посмотреть в их сторону боятся ваши сутенёры.
Пуск был произведён 64 ракетами. 5 штук не вышли из шахт установки. 28 штук "зацепили" радиус Борисоглебска в Хмеймим и "лягли", 8 потерялись, 23 долетели до района цели, 20 не смогли найти цель и 13 из них самоликвидировались, а 7 упали вне района цели выработав топливо, цель смогли найти 3. Одна повредила разобранный на запчасти самолёт-донор, вторая попала в поле, третья повредила столовую. Никто не пострадал, ВПП, ДП и приводные радары не повреждены - аэродром продолжил работу в штатном режиме.
Но 4,7% попаданий - это уже достижение! Хоть вообще попали примерно куда целились! (плюс минус пару километров... ;-) )
@@aleksmiller1579 Миша, ты по-русски заговорил!
@@aleksmiller1579 Эсминца было два. А на два эсминца даже у озвученной тобой "женщины" _седалища не хватит_ ©х/ф Формула любви. ;-)
Im glad you mentioned the Merrill. I was on that ship during that time. I was a sonar operator and watched the launch - and many others - on cctv in the CIC. They didn't work well in the beginning. The jet wouldn't light, etc. This has brought back memories for me. I got old, but I was there..right there.
The most powerful is the missile that successfully delivers the warhead straight to the target.
The loitering and damage assessment ability of Tomahawk is somehow puzzling. Any cruise missile looks heavy and has tiny wings - it must have a huge turning radius, many miles across, how can it successfully loiter and strike on command?
Yes
I don't know. I thought the same as you, plus the fact that it is rocket powered, so how can it carry enough fuel to hang around an area? I am confused. Cheers
Apparently you never saw a Yakhont launch....
@@РУСЛАН-ь3у I don't understand what you said...
Dont let it puzzle you. It didnt' loiter very well in Syria when most of them didn't reach their targets...they are still loitering to this day.
- The caliber is better at every possible point.
Why did the author assume that the Caliber is susceptible to jamming , no rocket , unlike Tomahawks , was silenced in this way
Well there's a story somewhere in internet that tomahawk is being jam by Russia when the US Navy fire it in Syria.... This video is misleading a bit in my opinion 🤔🙃
Lol, russia air defense system are junk it cant hit a shit when israeli destroy the Syrian russian made AA defense battery equipped with their new pantsir and s300 and you think people wil believe russian propaganda Get your facts right
@@Slycarlo get your facts straight those were old air defense battery systems when Russia deployed there latest air defense, there prime minister went to Moscow to meet Putin about deconflicting channels
They are pre programmed
@@Slycarlo Russia's air defense system is excellent, and you are biased and myopic.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 only th s400 and pantsir are good
Tomahawk is an old system really. An amazing system by even todays standards, but we need to developers a new system that has hypersonic velocity.
Нельзя научить черепаху бегать со скоростью гепарда! для большой скорости нужен гепард! или кто то другой быстрый!
@@АлександрШершнев-ы9ы I cannot understand?
Russia has already developed such systems and uses them in its armmii. The United States is 15-20 years behind in this regard. By the time the US reaches such technologies, Russia will have made a new technological breakthrough
lol, kalibr is designed in 198
@@Aleks_N77 Yup just like in Ukraine they burned through all there drones and are using off the shelf components to make up for it. except not (no real time telemetry etc.)
Still the fastest missile is the U.S. Minuteman III, which reaches hyper sonic speeds of Mach 28.2 (28,200kph).
Comparing the Tomahawk, a missile from the 80s, with the Kalibr which just saw the light in 2012. Not a real good comparison.
Right now, Russia fired Kalibr rockets at my city from a small rocket ship "Buyan"
unsuccessfully
Ага) Передай тоже самое дому офицеров)
@@knightentertainment1200 ?
Я говорю про конкретно данный момент, а не про неэффективность "Калибров" в целом. :)
Well, if it's just the range, that is a drawback of Tomahawk - boosting that shouldn't be a problem! Upgrading everything else (which is already better than the other hardware around, including Kalibr, would be way harder! Hell, frankly I'd love the tech from a Tomahawk (no, I don't mean the explosive warhead, I mean the datalink, camera, computer and nav-system!) to play around with :D
The Mk II nuclear version has a 1350nmi range just by virtue of the 290lb W80 nuclear warhead versus that standard 1000lb warhead. The Williams F107-WR-402 700 lbf (3.1 kN) engine is quite old now and could likely be improved by 20%-30% in fuel burn. If the 1000lb warhead of the 899nmi range Mk V were replaced by a 500lb harpoon warhead and 500lbs extra fuel carried we would see 1.25 hours extra full speed cruise so about 500nmi extra so about 1400nmi range (2600km) or 1600 miles. With a new engine maybe should get to 2000 miles. The long range versions of Kalibr achieve their extra range by being much heavier than Tomahawk. So we can get 50% more range by going for a 500lb warhead, 20% more range by a new modern jet engine and 70% if both or implemented.
Well, on April 14 2018, 70% of Missiles launched at Syria were intercepted or safely landed as one Tomahawk.
As for Kalibr, you can ask your Proxy Army how effective it is.
Lol 😂
And you can ask Putler and his proxy Russian troll army of yours, how effective US multiple rocket launchers are!
Kalibr >>> Tomahawk Look at the % of past failures.
US is best at propaganda in the world, no one disputes this.
The average hit % of a Tomohawk missile is %82, whilst the Kalibr is %63. Average Russian nazi
IF a Kalibr is launched then a 3m22 zircon can be launched from the same firing tube
Zircon is the best 😁🇷🇺
Kalibr isn't that "bad" either ... it works fine on nazi ukr weaponry depots !😁😆
@@mufasaf128 The Zircon missile reaches a speed of 11,200 km / h and carries a nuclear payload and cannot be detected by any air radar or anti-ground defense shield such as the Deveselul shield in Romania.
@@ioanfeher9232 True. nearly perfect !
The tomahawk missile tasting in Panama conflict in Central America, this missile in the beginning has so much trouble when fired they fell in residential areas killing many civilians , the US government payments to silence this incident and thus not disappoint your military industrial complex.
"«Калибр» Эта девятиметровая крылатая ракета взлетела на высоту до 900 километров"
900 км высоты это высота полета спутника!!! Высота пуска (для ракеты 3М-14АЭ): 500 - 11000 метров или 0,5-11 километров!!! Дизлайк!
U can ask ukraine about KALIBR they know everything since it hits them on daily basis and lose over 200 people in a strike xD
Ukraine with no air defense lol
Whats so funny about murdering civilians?
evidence of loosing 200 people in a strike?
Kalibr is impressive, consider the much smaller Military budget of Russia compare to Nato
Kalibr missiles have worked wonders against DAESH positions in Syria.
With correct precision.
Amarica may be slightly better in airplane manufacturing but when comes to mesile, specifically crouse mesile, Amarica is nowhere near to Russia.
Actually Amarican was westing time in publicity and making money from it but russian make more real stuff with relatively low cost and resources, which is now making knockout kick for Americans.
Sorry, but I just said truth. Because truth is truth.
I wonder if Russia will ever export them to other countries....
They do, under the export moniker club
Don't insult the Kalibr by comparing it with the Tomahawk
Can you please also make comparisons of brahmos vs tomohawk and others..
Commonly russia is master of all versions of missile.
No one can compete with Russia in Rocket Technologies. This is a fact. They just sometimes don’t have enough money to realize their projects. 😀
The first thing the Russians do is destroy the GPS satellites, after which the tomahawk will become a useless blank.
You should rewatch the video
Yeah today Russia is using kalibr
Kalibr all day
If Kalibr so great, why does it rarely hit real military targets? Seems overly hyped.
Like what ? A tank?
Я не специалист, но могу сказать что у любой ракеты есть модернизационный потенциал.
Томагавк конечно староват, но и платформ для запуска калибров не так много...
Так что пока говорить о превосходительстве рано.
Калибр также не молодой, они почти одногодки с томагавками. Платформ калибров мы не знаем, но точно не намного меньше..