Thanks Wrangler 👍🏻 For the RTG side, can Warp3D be used? What are your impressions in relation using this over a Mediator or Prometheus setup with a Voodoo or Radeon RTG setup? Any known issues or conflicts with Z3 cards, such as SCSI? Cheers 🍻
No Warp3D on the Z3660... yet! Shanshe is working on something though. Difficult to compare the Z3660 with the Mediator/Prometheus as they have more flexibility via PCI slots but the advantage of the Z3660 is that it is all-in-one. The only conflicts I'm aware of are with add-ons with DMA (eg A3000 SCSI, A4091) but again - watch this space!
Yes. Sellers I know of (there may be others) are Kavanoz on the Z3660 Discord that's linked from Shanshe's github page (right at the bottom): github.com/shanshe/Z3660/tree/main, torsti76 was selling them for those on a1k.org but may have temporarily stopped as I write this, and 8 bit dreams has a sale thread on Amibay.
6 หลายเดือนก่อน
I have a question regarding picasso96, I am using the old 2.0 version, but I noticed there are some new 3.x versions commercially available. Do you know if it's worth paying for this (since in the end we're not running actual Picasso cards but just emulated stuff) ? I'm not sure and the vendor does not clearly make it an obvious answer.
I'm not sure I can answer whether P96 v3+ is worth paying for but it would support the continued development of the software and therefore bug fixes/new features eg multi-monitor support. Picasso96 supports all sorts of gfx cards, not just Picasso cards and v3+ supports some cards not covered by v2. I guess the question really is, is there a good reason not to pay to upgrade?
6 หลายเดือนก่อน
@@wrangleramiga896 that seems to be a reasonable reason to do it of course, but I also would love to see if it's useful on a technical level, especially on a emulated platform :-) thanks
@@liquidmandotcom I have a screen that can't switch between 16:9 / 4:3 automatically... it support both modes, but you have to tell the screen manually if you want it display in 4:3 or in 16:9... so I run my AmigaONE X5000 in 1920x1080 and all is fine and dandy, but if I launch a game, lets say Quake that opens up an 800x600 screen, the monitor will then strech the image to fit the screen, unless I manually tell it to use the 4:3 aspect ratio instead.
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
I don't much much if any about Amigas, but I can read a % ... holy hell the speedup from AHI to MHI is insane!
Wrangler, could you please do an AmiTCP setup for everyone to see please? It's a right royal pain and guidance would be very helpful indeed 😊
I'm building one and putting it in my A3000, that is broken at the moment. It will be an adventure for sure 🙂
What about Doom benchmarks with 68060 @ 100Mhz or soft68K and RTG?
Quake's 21.34 fps is close to Pentium 90. BFG 9060's 17.53 fps is close to Pentium Overdrive 83 Mhz which is below Pentium 75's results
Good stuff!
Thanks!
Thanks Wrangler 👍🏻 For the RTG side, can Warp3D be used? What are your impressions in relation using this over a Mediator or Prometheus setup with a Voodoo or Radeon RTG setup? Any known issues or conflicts with Z3 cards, such as SCSI? Cheers 🍻
No Warp3D on the Z3660... yet! Shanshe is working on something though. Difficult to compare the Z3660 with the Mediator/Prometheus as they have more flexibility via PCI slots but the advantage of the Z3660 is that it is all-in-one. The only conflicts I'm aware of are with add-ons with DMA (eg A3000 SCSI, A4091) but again - watch this space!
90 degrees HDMI also probably works?
In an A4000, yes. In an A3000, no...
Is there any place where you can buy a pre-built Z3660?
Yes. Sellers I know of (there may be others) are Kavanoz on the Z3660 Discord that's linked from Shanshe's github page (right at the bottom): github.com/shanshe/Z3660/tree/main, torsti76 was selling them for those on a1k.org but may have temporarily stopped as I write this, and 8 bit dreams has a sale thread on Amibay.
I have a question regarding picasso96, I am using the old 2.0 version, but I noticed there are some new 3.x versions commercially available. Do you know if it's worth paying for this (since in the end we're not running actual Picasso cards but just emulated stuff) ? I'm not sure and the vendor does not clearly make it an obvious answer.
I'm not sure I can answer whether P96 v3+ is worth paying for but it would support the continued development of the software and therefore bug fixes/new features eg multi-monitor support. Picasso96 supports all sorts of gfx cards, not just Picasso cards and v3+ supports some cards not covered by v2. I guess the question really is, is there a good reason not to pay to upgrade?
@@wrangleramiga896 that seems to be a reasonable reason to do it of course, but I also would love to see if it's useful on a technical level, especially on a emulated platform :-) thanks
what's a bipmap? :-D
Circles should be round, not ovals.
It could be the monitor's scaling or the capture device's behavior
No the pixel aspect ratio is off in the sysprefs screen settings. You would know this if you had yourself an AMIGA 'back in the day'.@@AdamPolkosnik
@@liquidmandotcomRight, because I did
@@liquidmandotcom I have a screen that can't switch between 16:9 / 4:3 automatically... it support both modes, but you have to tell the screen manually if you want it display in 4:3 or in 16:9... so I run my AmigaONE X5000 in 1920x1080 and all is fine and dandy, but if I launch a game, lets say Quake that opens up an 800x600 screen, the monitor will then strech the image to fit the screen, unless I manually tell it to use the 4:3 aspect ratio instead.