Shadow banking: still big, still dangerous

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ค. 2010
  • The part of the financial system that lends the most money to Americans remains almost untouched by regulation. It's shadow banking, as Paddy Hirsch explains. #MarketplaceAPM #EconomicExplainers
    Subscribe to our channel!
    / marketplacevideos

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @JJMax
    @JJMax 13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can read and read and read about everything you explain and it all seems complicated and I retain only half of it. You draw a couple stick figures on a white board and explain in plain English and it all seems so clear and simple. Thank you for these videos.

  • @mattdathew2794
    @mattdathew2794 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this guy knows finance very well

  • @davidalen9279
    @davidalen9279 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you are an excellent teacher. thank you kindly sir!

  • @Razor1602
    @Razor1602 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for making these videos I will try to watch more.

  • @MrSupernova111
    @MrSupernova111 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Keep up the good work!

  • @globalfinanceschool
    @globalfinanceschool 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation!

  • @DancehallHitlist
    @DancehallHitlist 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    why do we need deposit insurance to insure ones and zeors in a computer

  • @abhinavitsmebellamy
    @abhinavitsmebellamy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, Sensei!!

  • @riy99
    @riy99 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are Always the best.

  • @lisalph8922
    @lisalph8922 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why did pension funds and other investors buy these packaged MBSs without doing any due diligence on the underlying safety of the loans? I've read that they relied on credit rating agencies like Moody & Poors. If so, why would credit rating agencies give a high rating to such shadow banks without understanding the riskiness of the loans that they were originating?

  • @delatroy
    @delatroy 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Paddy - bailouts solidify and validate future bailouts. Sure it'll help business in the short term, but the moral hazard and debt accumulation required to bail them out far outweighs the benefit.
    If the massive banks were let go, people could still bank the next day. Its happend before. Investors would be pissed off, but this is how its supposed to work. The poorer, ordinary people of the US are forced disproportionally to give a higher % of their income to the richest people in society.

  • @gulllars
    @gulllars 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is riciculous is that the banks (and financial corporations) aren't subject to the same competition regulation as non-financial corporations (tech f.ex.)
    If a bank is so big it will crash the entire financial system of a country if it fails, it can not be allowed to take risks that could crash it. If it does it's dangerous recklessness and incompetence, or undermining national security.

  • @crankshootvlogs5295
    @crankshootvlogs5295 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Mr. How many white board markers do you buy every week?

  • @theslimeylimey
    @theslimeylimey 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, if a converged bank runs into trouble, what's stopping them from transferring bad debt of their uninsured shadow bank arm into their traditional insured(by tax payers) bank and the moving the "good" debt into their shadow bank arm?

  • @Dindinger
    @Dindinger 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very "simple" yet deceptive. Standard banks that we all "know and love" do not lend out the money we put in, rather they lend out 20 times the amount we put in, or more. Which is why they are also very dangerous - he doesn't explain this practice. I wonder why?

  • @niggaflies
    @niggaflies 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because of fractional reserve banking...

  • @erwinbeltran959
    @erwinbeltran959 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Shadow banking + Dark pools + Under the table deals + unregulated activities = the real economy

  • @deathless3518
    @deathless3518 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Countrywide, Coldwell Banking, Nationwide? I didn't even know these were just unregulated banks.

  • @se7ensnakes
    @se7ensnakes 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Look at the problem with Credit, there is 14 trillion dollars in Personal debt but world wide there is only 4 trillion dollars. So how can the banks loan more than there is?

    • @_Junkers
      @_Junkers 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is it a matter of a bank loaning money or accrued interest?

  • @mrblack61
    @mrblack61 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @theDeckisStacked "This would increase the value of money tenfold" ? surly that depends on the amount of money in circulation? If the FRB system was abolished wed have to decide where to start again, then either pin the value to something (gold / ron paul) or (fairly manage the supply as needed / bill)? both options imo are far better than the debt backed nonsense we currently have. oh btw i didnt realise bill had a channel, I will do some research ;)

  • @mouhaxp
    @mouhaxp 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm puzzled...how can lend almost twice as more then our GDP which is 15 trillion @APM Marketplace

  • @DCUPtoejuice
    @DCUPtoejuice 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    too big to fail implies we don't have a choice. we do. we could let them fail and deal with the fallout by restructuring

  • @dishesdealer417
    @dishesdealer417 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @chillercm
    Depositors get the money, but I am talking about Investors. People who OWN the bank either as regular owners for private banks or shareholders of the corporation for public banking companies. Why should they get welfare? Investors are supposed to know they are taking a risk and they would lose, but not anymore, they go whining to the feds & get billions.

  • @niggaflies
    @niggaflies 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also not just Americans are in also rich foreigners

  • @kbc201282
    @kbc201282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Banks don't lend depositor's money. This is not how banking works, re modern money mechanics.

  • @ChefEarthenware
    @ChefEarthenware 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    "I put my money in the Bank every month like a good citizen.." - so if I don't use a Bank then I am a bad citizen?

  • @abc123icuucme
    @abc123icuucme 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @DCUPtoejuice No we don't have a choice and it's not because they are 'too big to fail' it's because they have paid not to fail. Pay your congressman more bribes than them and you can have what you want.

  • @MrSupernova111
    @MrSupernova111 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @BlacksAreBeautiful
    Shadow bank means its not a depository bank. They get their money from investors. To your question, not neccesarily.

  • @fearlv1rattata
    @fearlv1rattata 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This aged very well.

  • @codeknight7
    @codeknight7 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who watching this in 2020.

  • @vinmorin
    @vinmorin 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ChefEarthenware No, you are known as a smart citizen.

  • @se7ensnakes
    @se7ensnakes 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is not correct and it is improper education

    • @Razor1602
      @Razor1602 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please tell why

    • @se7ensnakes
      @se7ensnakes 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Razor1602 @1.10 Paddy explains that commercial banks get their money from depositors and then issue it as credit. The process is actually quite different. The savings are not touched,i.e. there is no decrease in savings as the banks issue a $400,000 loan for example. The Loan then goes into circulation but it eventually gets redeposited as a check in the same bank or another bank. In order for the first bank to balance its books it borrows from the banking system. The Counterfeit Credit Electronic Money is just created ex-niholo. There are many articles on this. Also There are empirical economic models that show that fractional reserve banking is a myth. but in fact. banks are just loaning money out of thing air.

    • @Razor1602
      @Razor1602 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great thanks for the info.

    • @se7ensnakes
      @se7ensnakes 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Razor1602 Dont you want details?

    • @Razor1602
      @Razor1602 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes but I thought that that was all you wanted to say. I figured I would look it up later. But yes some details/links would be great.