Teodor Currentzis - Mozart's Requiem: 3. Dies Irae
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.ค. 2017
- Full concert here: bit.ly/SalzburgMozartRequiemCurrentzis
Subscribe to our channel for more videos ow.ly/ugONZ
Mozart's Requiem
Anna Prohaska: Soprano
Katharina Magiera: Contralto
Mauro Peter: Tenor
Tareq Nazmi: Bass
musicAeterna Choir
Vitaly Polonsky: Chorus director
MusicAeterna: Orchestra
Teodor Currentzis: Conductor
Concert recorded at Felsenreitschule (Salzburg, Austria), on July 23, 2017 at 19:00
© Unitel, ZDF/3sat, ORF
Follow medici.tv on:
| Facebook : / medicitv
| Twitter : / medicitv
| Instagram : / medici.tv
Dive into the heart of classical music with medici.tv! Get closer than ever to the artists you love and have an unforgettable experience with 150+ live webcasts each year and 2600+ videos.
A rare and exclusive selection of concerts, ballets, operas, documentaries, master classes, behind-the-scenes and interviews! - บันเทิง
The art of playing fast but unhurried.
I literally LOVE this tempo and all those crescendis. I could listen to it for hours
Be aware that you might start staggering somewhere between hours 1 and 2.
This is the best interpretation of this piece i've ever heard.
Впечатление :Ураган , который все сметает с лица земли. Восторг, радость и ужас.Браво,дирижеру. Курентзис и его оркестр великолепен!
What a performance! From the dynamics to the tempo... Brilliant. Maestro Currentzis and the entire ensemble might have just pulled off one of the most expressive Dies Irae(s) out there....
This is the most perfect performance i've heard. Bravo
I could not connect to this tempo, not until I listened to the entire Requiem conducted by TC.
Now I believe that it’s one of the best performances ever captured on film.
My.. God...
i love this version.. Dies Irae !!
Excellent
Me too, I can't stop listening.
better than I could ever imagine
The best version of Dies Irae , breathtaking...
"the limit of understanding" A superb performance!
Now *THAT* is how that movement is supposed to sound!
The concert master is bringing back hair metal
Incredible.
Браво!!! 👏👏👏🙏
sometimes conductors play something waay to slow, other play it too quick. This version of Dies Irae is perfect!
Seriously it re-defines the term perfection!
Amazing! marvelous performance!👍🏻
Was er vollbringt ist vollendende Musik, in all seiner Seele und Kraft
Wow, this is the best version I've heard.
What an otherwordly, marvellous performance!
Inspiring to say the very least!
Epic dynamical performance!
Peeeerfect!! Love this Dies Irae!
ГЕНИАЛЬНО!!!
Incredible !!!
Goosebumps ❤
Currentzis' version 180 bpm. Bernstein's 164 bpm. Karajan's is at "boring" bpm.. Feel free to choose "your" best one depending on the situation. Tempo is relative and objective. If someone was used to listen to music played above 200bpm this version would be "too slow" for him/her. There are no rules in adaptation and experimentation. Bravo to the conductor the wonderful musicians and the sound engineers.
Tempo is objective, but the point is that stunning effect wich appears from this performance not about tempo. From word "at all".
Чудо браво
Wow! Just wow!
hervorragend...!!!
THAT is the character of the piece, I think
It is and will always be 🙂
Großartig!
Einzigartig!
SUPERB
Великолепно!!! Идеально!!! Дирижер - выше понимания!!! Браво всем!!! Можно смотреть бесконечно... Чудо!!!!!!!!!
Oh my gosh! Best performance of this I've ever seen!
So philosophic and sincere, this interpretation ! It Immediattely sent me to Celibidache.s words...music is Something else but nice or wrong, it is the Truth !
Amazing how Curentzis understood that Mozart.s soul is there, the end contain the beggining..
💐 Bravo 💐 01:27 💐
Гениально
Музыкантам- брависсимо! Темп....,не знаю, мог ли быть такой темп во времена Моцарта...
В этом суть современного исполнения. Никто в здравом уме не пытается сыграть точно "как тогда" - это все равно возможно лишь в определенной степени. Вместо этого, многие ауиентисты предлагают играть эту музыку, как написанную сейчас, как живое произведение, а не музейный экспонат
Very interesting interpretation! Really felt rather alive through the tempo and dynamics.
Having said that, I do wonder if I actually like it though!
EPIC!
EPIC!!!!!!!!!
Потрясающе. Браво, Маэстро и MusicAeterna!!
By the way, this orchestra and chorus are from Ural, almost Siberia. In the depths of Russia, not bears live, but such musicians...))
The soundtrack of the year 2022
wow.
cool!
¿Dónde puedo encontrar el concierto completo?
How can one not applaud after this? Modern concert etiquette is inhuman.
I agree
Agreed
They applaud at the end of the requiem.
Disagreed. You need to let the music sink in.
Bruh but have you ever been to a travis scott concert. Its fucking littttt
🌹 О, БОЖЕ !!! КАК ПРЕКРАСНО !!!
Μπράβο στην ορχηστρα κ στην χορωδία!
The dynamics were Great! A feat! It was very hard to keep this very fast rythm between the voices, the high Presto, around 170, so they lost the tempo a little. To me, my mind and my soul to feel the energy of apocalypse experimented and felt the tempo is better when is a little Presto between 144-150.This little Presto is like little by little scratching the clouds to go to the sky.
Shut up
This version is soooooo quick 😔
Αααααααα!!!!
위에 이곡 번스타인하고 비교 해서 들었는데요 팀파니가 돋보이네요 곡 전체적으로 번스타인보다 쿠란츠 지휘가 더 돋보임
특이한 해석이군요 ㅎ 재밌네요
This and Harnoncourt's 2004 version of Dies Irae are very much alike.
First!!!
I N C R E D I B L E -- 💯
Jeeeeesus! This is the version for the current Doomsday Clock time.
this version is very fast!! :0
요즘은 녹화 장비가 좋아저서 그런건지 아니면 나만 그렇게 느끼는건지 잘 몰겠는데 번스타인보다 더 잘하는거 같음 종종 유튜브 열면 이거 듣는데.............
This is best!
Wt...this performance, i don't believe...brabo!!!
난 종종 모자르트 베르디의 레퀴엠을 듣지만 지금 지휘자가 젤 잘한다는 생각을 한다 단 난 음악에 문외한이다 그렇치만 귀는 고급이다
I wnat to buy the bluray of this concert, im in mexico, how can i do it???
Plus vite que Art.Toscanini.
It feels like its in 2?
alla breve
Wow! This is how Rimsky-Korsakov's Flight of the Bumble Bee would sound, if, according to the plot, the poor insect were relentlessly chased by a hungry titmouse.
De la musique TGV
Les agonisants n'ont plus le temps de rendre l'âme
Sic transit
If you know anyone who thinks classical music is all prissy men in powdered wigs, send them to listen to this.
God is here
Warum läßt er die letzten Silben nicht singen?
Second!!!
It is interesting to see: In the past everything tended to be romanticized, playing everything with a beautiful sound and rather slow. When great names (thet had influence) like Harnoncourt started to explore historic informed performance a completly new ideal of sound was created, in my opinion fitting better to the character intended by the composer. Now we arrived at a different situation: While the historical informed sound is kept, Mr. Currentzis chooses himself the freedom to completly change the dynamic and part of the articulation intended in Mozarts score (in my opinion this is not (!) a problem of tempo). He is doing something completly different while pretending to be historically correct - kind of a weird situation and in my opinion unsatisfying.
AndyHjo understood..... But anyway, any attempt to do something different is good.😎🍷
A valid thought! My perspective is that he must not claim this as entirely historical in some regards, because it indeed is not, and secondly, that it needn't be historically informed in all regards to be a meaningful addition to a pantheon of great Requiem interpretations. I personally love this take on the Requiem-not in spite of the occasional deviation from historical norms, but actually because of them. The inventiveness shines a new light on structures within the music that are meaningful to discover more deeply in this way. All in perspective with the understanding that composer's purest intent, or custom, is a separate ideal to pursue for other, very valid reasons.
For someone to "pretend" to be historically correct they have to "claim" to be historically correct. Has Currentzis ever done this? I think it has more to do with creating an effect that would today be similar to what an audience may have heard or experienced then. He is not so far off from Renee Jakobs and Concert Köln. The amazing thing about a genius like Mozart is that his music just as amazing with Karajan as it is with Currentzis.
Your majesty, the difference is that you are writing " a knowing it all" / useless review from your cave somewhere, while he is conducting in the best concert halls in the world, with his amazing orchestra, recoded numerous acclaimed CD's and Videos...so just shut up!
Auidible text= di esi ,. e si , di esi ,. e si , di esie etc
¿where can we see and listen the full concert now?
There is a dvd so check it out!
@@BetonBrutContemporary In the channel?
@@knoewon4310 no...you can look up so you can find some copies on sale
Too fast! You go too fast! Salieri to mozart in amadeus.
Lolol underrated comment. Love it
Do the wiedergabegeschwindigkeit auf 0,50
Lol
Офигеть он их выдрессировал.
Выдрессировал? Теодор сказал в каком-то интервью, что ему не нравится тыкать дирижерской палочкой.. Нет, он не собирается дрессировать, он любит людей, тем более, - своих музыкантов, объясняя и показывая, - его собственное мнение по поводу интерпретации, тем самым, - зажигая их.., и они просто, идут за ним...
The tempo is wrong. There is no 2/2, just 4/4
But the execution time is more higher than the normal composition. Tempo isn't wrong, your ears are. It's a f*cking Day of Wrath, not a stroll along the sea.
Tempo is completely fine. Music was in general played a bit faster in Mozarts time than in our time. Our percepcion of Allegro and Adagio etc has changed.
I wonder how a conductor and his full ensemble did not realize such a bold mistake?
You wrong, Allegro from Mozart's period is a little bit slower, and same for all the fast tempi
And the slow tempi of that period was a little bit fastest than today, Mozart's Andante is more animated than an Tchaikovsky's Andante, so be careful with that subject.
Currentzis have made his choices when he decide to take this tempo for the Dies Irae, I think it's ok, every (honest and passionate) artist can give their personal version of the Requiem.
Non è leggermente troppo veloce?
Isn't it supposed to be forceful and therefore fast?
Slow down the video in the settings 😂
Not quite my tempo
While the musicianship is superb, I find it difficult to get behind this performance in this context. Dynamics, expression, and tempo seem a little inappropriate for this Baroque-inspired piece from the classical era.
😖😖😖
난 지금 지휘자의 모자르트 리퀴엠 들을때만 하느님이 있다고 믿오 ㅎㅎㅎ
그렇다면 당신이 믿는 하느님은 세상을 멸망시키기 위해서 존재하는 거지요. DIES IRAE의 가사를 상기해보면 말이지요.
@@sohyungwooahnshin3118 I think his referring that the music is so beautiful that now he believes in God.
quanto vuol fare il fighetto..
Sorry but I didn't like this version ... Very speed for me.
Interessante ma alla fin fine ne esce una porcata
anche la tua faccia, ma mica per questo ce ne lamentiamo.
How can filth be interesting?
Juan Carlos Londoño maybe decadence and madness
Taci cretino
esatto,grandissima porcata,diciamo interpretazione escrementizia
Этот пипираст перестал кривлятся руками и музыканты сами заиграли как надо, хм.
Could slow it down a bit you know. You ain’t playing flight of bumblebee
Sounds less like Mozart and more like a film soundtrack, to me.
Wow I definitely agree
Correct, quite sacrilegious.
@@LexWinchesterr Why though...
The sound is the typical modern hard cold sound. Has nothing to do with Mozart.
It's literally Mozart's piece. Just because it was *slightly* faster doesn't mean it loses anything from its original quality.
@@Geoffrey6_ i don't speak about tempi. Do you know what I mean when I speak about "sound"?
Sinful Mozart. At such a pace the whole requiem will probably be completed in 10 minutes by this conductor
No, and even if so, would that be a bad thing?
I like the fact that more than 2 centuries after Mozart's death, there's still some part for imagination, or inventivity. Altought I'm not a big fan of this interpretation.
When you’re trying to rush the end of the world
Trop d'effets, trop frénétique, trop de trop.
気をてらった演奏を聴かせれば注目を浴びるとでも思っているのか？実に聴いていられない酷い演奏だ。モーツァルトもビックリ。
WHAT DO YOU MEAN???? IT WAS AMAZING!!!
Whether THESE dynamics nor THIS tempo is given in the score. Sorry, but fully failed.
Lets see you do better?
@@schidius Thanks, but I did in Budapest half a year ago.
That’s amazing man, but every conductor has their different interpretation of a piece,and you don’t necessarily need to agree with it.Mad props to you for conducting it though!
Music is interpreted in many ways from different point of views. The real question is ¿Did you enjoy the piece as a listener?
@@knoewon4310 No, I didn't.
One of the worst version that I`ve heard. Out of tempo, the dinamics all bad. Please don't try to modify the original score,
Can you do it better your majesty? This is one of the best rendition of the requiem ( I have about 15 recordings of this piece) ...so please go and make yourself some tacos or whatever instead of commenting nonsense...
Do you have a 15 different recording for this masterpiece?, and you don't recognize the good vs. bad versions?, well, do you need some tacos in order you brai start to work, beacuse now is out.
You see, little men are often insecure and intimidated from/by art, music, literature that propel forward- toward something new...
End of discussion.
Yair Gil if you feel that, dont worry, maybe some one day you understand real music. Good look.
Okay, can you deliver to us some "proper" version, please?
Awful
Unfortunately no
Mozart for meth addicts.