President Reagan's Address to Canadian Parliament on April 6, 1987
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ต.ค. 2017
- Full Title: Trip to Canada. President Reagan's Address to a Joint Session of Parliament in Ottawa on April 6, 1987
Creator(s): President (1981-1989 : Reagan). White House Television Office. 1/20/1981-1/20/1989 (Most Recent)
Series: Video Recordings, 1/20/1981 - 1/20/1989
Collection: Records of the White House Television Office (WHTV) (Reagan Administration), 1/20/1981 - 1/20/1989
Transcript: www.reaganlibrary.gov/researc...
Production Date: 4/6/1987
Access Restriction(s):Unrestricted
Use Restriction(s):Unrestricted
Contact(s): Ronald Reagan Library (LP-RR), 40 Presidential Drive, Simi Valley, CA 93065-0600
Phone: 800-410-8354, Fax: 805-577-4074, Email: reagan.library@nara.gov
National Archives Identifier:77443160
catalog.archives.gov/id/77443160
Canadians and Americans united
Today in the year 2020 we desperately need such men.,
Xin tu gia thanh pho trang mua bay lam chim bay moi canh nuoc mat xua ta tu dung khoc chi em thoi buon chi em doi trai ngang nen minh lo duyen tinh duong xua anh di chuyen xua cho anh cho em de mot nguoi vui cuoi troi
I guess Im kind of randomly asking but does anybody know a good website to watch new tv shows online ?
@Rodrigo Van I would suggest FlixZone. Just google for it :)
@Alfredo Johnathan Definitely, been using flixzone for since april myself =)
@Alfredo Johnathan thanks, signed up and it seems like a nice service :) I really appreciate it !
April 6th, 1987. My 21st birthday. I remember this speech. A huge dispute going on in Canada over NAFTA.
What a classy man, Ronald Reagan.
A far cry from Donald Trump. And I am historically a Democrat.
The best ever Canadian Prime Minister.. Not to be seen again ... Times when Canada was on top because of him ...
Today USA need such presidents
Gross.
I remember seeing this speech as a young adult that's when I knew the Americans will always in the end make sure Canada is always free regardless of which Trudeau is in charge.
The Trudeau’s weren’t/aren’t dictators.
Don’t buy into the conspiracy crap…
@@Nephalem2002 didn’t age well
@@therealpvc2541 It did
@@Nephalem2002 hahaha I guess you love fascism
@@mozymandias1441 Imagine thinking something is Facism because your were slighty inconvenienced by a problem you chose not to solve. Fuckin’ morons..
Boy, some of the responders here are nuts.........He broke the Soviet Union's back, along with Pope John Paul II. So there, NDP lover.
Compare Reagan to the Orange Turd we have the the Oval Office..
That was done by Gorbachev not Reagan.
President Reagan would be appalled at what happened to his Country
Reagan, Mulroney, and Thatcher. Leaders that we desperately need today. Governments that were able to debate and develop bills that were fair to both sides of the aisle.
The Next Step and Brooklyn Nine Nine Series is gonna Love THIS😍
Toi ca khong hay toi dan nghe cung do nhung tien vo nhieu va that nhieu
Stirs up memories for sure, what stood out at me he restored confidence in the USA primarily and the rest of the world which was the mistake of the Vietnam war, I suppose that is plain language and maybe leaning a little one way a little bit but the region is my home away from home my retirement home. One cannot fathom that it even happened. RIP.🤠👍
Former prime minister John Turner was in favour of free trade with the U.S. too. He just didn't agree with the free trade deal being proposed by then prime minister Brian Mulroney. Reagan sought trade agreements with Japan at the same time. But not fair trade among equals. He insisted that Honda subsidize Harley Davidson to modernize or impose tariffs. He didn't think the American motorcycle company could compete on its merits against a foreign competitor.
A wonderful time.
lol - they skipped over Mulroney...
Who's the dude who looks like Mackenzie King in the background?
John Fraser, Speaker of the House of Commons (1985-93), and MP for Vancouver South from 1972-93.
😍🇺🇸🇨🇦😍
I love you mr. President......
Ed el Sensodyne.
I hope he came in through Mirabel Airport....
Don’t worry Ottawa has an international airport! Nothing to envy Mirabel one…
He was indeed a brilliant speaker
I don’t believe he looked at his papers once
He was an actor.
The year is now 2021, "Second verse, same as the first", That name Churchill once more, 12k veiws, and only 142K likes, this "WOKE" amusement park is closed, "reap the whirlwind" folks!
3 tarekanum amusnatsrek!
Hบลิวทำคุณโกหกอีกแล้วหนูเสียใจมาก
👴👴🙇🙇
Thank you 😆💕✨
アルメニア花言葉
🌊海
共感、思いやり
When Reagans visted Canada did they eat poutine?
He wouldn't eat it. It has 'poo' in it.
Of course Canada wasn't necessarily a nation built by refugees early on. Canada was largely United Empire Loyalists and our domestic political confederation was created in reaction to the U.S. and its sense of manifest destiny. We said no way! We didn't join. We remained loyal.
The UEL WERE refugees.
@@DrLeroyArch By what standard?
Trump is a better president than Reagans?
Mini Me lol
Dont make me to laugh
He’s better than any conservative but he’s inherently flawed as a politician.
They're both TRASH.
@@Nephalem2002😢😂😮😮😢
He speaks as someone who doesn't understand any of the history he is referencing.
Heckle him! DO it Svend! YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reagan was heckled during this speech by Canada's NDP and that footage is conveniently deleted from this video. They were upset, like most of the world was, over his Star Wars initiative. Reagan was a confused old man who didn't understand the economy, military policy and pretty much everything else during his time in office. He was a great communicator and expert glad-hander who was more about style than substance. His trickle down economic theories have been proven wrong and are responsible for the gap that exists today between the rich and the poor.
walter, those policies were intended to perpetuate inequality - they didn't fail, they created exactly the disaster they were intended to create.
you picked the median income metric because you're trying to hide the decline in average real incomes. the thing about you people is that you're dishonest, and i'm currently really just not interested in debating the point.
average _real_ incomes have *not* been rising. but, i actually don't believe in taxes. or property rights. or currency, at all, for that matter.
it is well known that real incomes have been stagnant since the 1970s in the united states. while i am certain that your data is dishonest, and i am capable of demonstrating as much, i'm not currently interested in doing so. maybe, i'll put it in my itinerary between demonstrating the existence of gravity and showing that water is wet.
i mean, you're the liar here scorpio, so you tell me - are you presenting average household data instead of average wage data to gloss over the decrease in real wages by ignoring the rise of two-income families? is that the tactic, here? we can figure it out if we look at it closely enough, together.