FINALLY, This has actually made my day. I watched 8.04, 8.05 and can complete it with 8.06. I now have plans for the weekend! Thank you Dr. Zweibach and thank you MIT!
I was one minute into the video and I immediately knew that this guy knows what he is talking about and is a good lecturer. After having seen more of him, I can say I wasn*t wrong and thanks for sharing these nice lectures!
This course is an incredible gift. Thank you, MIT. You are truly generous. Thank you, Barton Zwiebach. You are a master teacher, brilliant, and rare indeed. Thank you, TH-cam/Google. These are not only not evil, but actually, positively good.
He's amazing, i wish someone told me MIT uploaded their lectures while i started my BSc in Physics back in 2016. I used to search for quantum mechanics lectures and TH-cam would never suggest me this. Then last year a friend of mine showed me the path to Quantum enlightenment with 8.04 and i haven't been the same.
No idea what he is saying but I love his presentation. I know for sure that he is giving an excellent explanation to those who understand what he is saying.
In short: You have a solution to a simple system, but now you want to solve a more complex system that you either don't know how to solve, or the method of solution is too complicated for you to be able to do that. So what you do? You add an extra term that you believe is a good guess of what the more complex system might do, and you add this extra term with a "tweak" (the lambda), so that you could start with your simple solution and gradually "tweak in" this extra term to see how it changes the solution and whether it meets the requirements of the solution that you're looking for. You tweak it back and forth until you find the best match (e.g. the lowest energy state, which is usually what nature would choose as well as the best solution), and you have a working model for your complex system.
30mins ago I was watching my Sagittarius star sign reading, then I watched the top 10 foods to eat in London, I've watched a poker vlogger in Vegas....and now I'm here. I think I've stumbled into matter way above my station. He might as well be speaking Japanese, I don't understand any of it....but I wish I did.
I can speak fluent Japanese and I can also understand this. All you need is to motivate yourself and remember what your goal is. What are you trying to achieve from learning perturbation theory? For me, it crosses into my interests of mathematics, linguistics and computer science. If you want to learn Japanese at some point, I have advice for that as well.
Durp Durper alright, since you can make it simple, is there any way to fit all the theory given in this particular lecture in one simple life example which would be explicit enough for a non-academic person. I mean it would be easy to follow if a lecturer would show how this theory can be applied to a real life problem, either from technology or business field.
You need to have a certain level of physics understanding before watching these videos. SHOs are the most basic example of a Hamiltonian. I'd suggest watching some lower level physics stuff first. Maybe watch a series over classical mechanics first.
Sir it's my humble request to make videos on the course of relativistic quantum mechanics..... your lecture is awesome sir..just awesome .....its my request to mit.... it'll help a lot
Question for the part discussed at 17:06 , should the index k not start with k=0, so k element of [0,1,.....( ? I just got confused here, because the comparison of the Energies starts for k=0: E(0,0)
Here is what we have for Quantum Mechanic courses on MIT OpenCourseWare: ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=science&subcat=physics&spec=quantummechanics We hope some of these are of interest. :)
just to high civilization and independent is 2 different issue. civilization link to the rule and order. if on rule and order. we need international police can enforce the rule . to protect the weak . independent link to lawless on bully mindset.
One dimension in the spectral state Means eigenvalues follow a general para meter?Thanks but getting first view wrong interpretati o ns Thank u so much for the constructive lessons
Alllow me to ask u Please when always be On (0) means: where can we find independence? Is there such When comparing? Could u Please guide me maybe a previous lesson or books to reach a better understanding mainly in Hamilton's-oscillations-eigeinvalues function? Thanks!!
That could actually be helpful if we could sort the TH-cam by the number of views, from LEAST views to most. Then all videos appreciated by smart people would be on the top of that list :J
This guy is really first-rate, but I've got a slightly different question. What I want to know is, What does it cost us that we don't have an intellectual bridge over the very tiny but ver-ree deep chasm between the areas of industry where the quantum view is useful and the rest of real life where we live in billiard ball physics at voltages between about one and the latest in high-tension transmission lines?* As theories go, the Standard Model is pretty good. It gives us replicable numbers out to twenty significant digits or so, and it lets us mix the chemicals and what-not in ways that make an advanced industrial economy tick over nicely, thank you very much. So it has some problems? Like e.g. a total 100% inability to explain Bell's Inequality and a 99.44% likelihood of drifting off into mindless blither when anybody tries? So what? That's my question. Where is it costing us spondulix that we can't explain the two-slit-experiment? Where there's money on the line is where we'll find the intellectual band-aids to get us through the next generation of our view of physical reality. __________________ * There is a good fix for this supposed chasm, using the explanation that quantum reality is everywhere, it's everywhere, all the way up. I.I.Rabi famously calculated the likelihood of a normal masonry brick levitating a foot (a measure of length used in the United States, Liberia and Saudi Arabia) in the air in any given second. For an encore, he did the Heisenberg uncertainties relevant to trying to drive a ten-foot truck through a nine-foot gap. Both calculations come up with numbers like once in ten to the Q times the age of the universe, with Q being, uh, rather large numbers. The excellent Jim El-Khalili, who is well overdue to become Sir James, has some good lectures, e.g. th-cam.com/video/wwgQVZju1ZM/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=TheRoyalInstitution, on a parallel theme, that we see quantum effects at human scales in biology. (Google him: I think he might be in the running to be the Carl Sagan of the present generation of public science.) Neither of these life-rafts of sanity, however, comes with an answer to the intellectual challenge of Bell and those pesky interference patterns.
the topic should on the civilization. this link to rule and order set by the world leader. every country need to adhere the rule based policy. it is nothing on independent state issue. this prevent a military strong country. invade small country. UN is a civilization organisation we cannot stay alone. like nothing happen to us. we need to care for each other. having the same mindset on understanding live in this civilization. if nonindependent(selfish), the military strong country will invade the weaker country. like rusia invade ukrine. or china invade some big country draw the new desk line in asia. to invade a small country resources. this will bring us back to soviet era. big fish eat small fish.no more justice . this make ppl live in slavery life. this is not the way for civilization. just to highlight civilization and independent is 2 different issues. civilisation link to rule and order. independent link to self fish behaviour.we are living in same world. any thing happen will affect our survival. no country can alone.
Countries invading other countries is actually more likely to happen when people undertake a hive mindset like the one you're postulating, because then they become more prone to be manipulated by their leaders to do awful things when convinced by them that it's "for the greater good" (which is usually just their leader's and his close comrades' good, at the cost of both the citizens as well as those they help invading). This likelihood becomes smaller when people are able to think independently of each other and exchange their ideas freely, and when countries can work independently of each other, because then if some country is doing stupid things, it deteriorates, and other countries see that it's stupid and learn their lesson on someone else's mistake instead of on their own's. And the country that is doing bad has a lot of other countries to look up to if they want to fix their own issues. It's like a free market of ideas, and a free market of solutions for how a country should be run in order to prosper. Merging countries into bigger countries usually makes things worse in the same way monopolies ruin the market. It might seem to work better in the beginning, but soon enough everything starts to go south, and that's why all the greatest empires from the past have fallen. They were too big and monolithic to support their own weight. We observe the same phenomenon in biology: cells don't grow endlessly, because their needs grow proportionally to their volume (that is, as x³), but their ability to transfer nutrients in and waste material out through the surface of their membrane is only proportional to the surface of that membrane (that is, as x²). So as their surface area grows to balance the volume, it begins to fold and ultimately it must split into two to keep the balance. The same principle applies to countries and their boundaries.
FINALLY, This has actually made my day. I watched 8.04, 8.05 and can complete it with 8.06. I now have plans for the weekend! Thank you Dr. Zweibach and thank you MIT!
Hi, there are two versions of 8.04. which one you have watched??
i have been waiting for this for years
me too!
Is your profile pic Schrödinger?
@@jaykay2218 It depends on wether you're observing it or not
I guess it's kinda randomly asking but does anyone know of a good site to watch newly released tv shows online?
@Damien Mack try Flixzone. You can find it by googling :)
Prof. Zweibach is the best prof I've never had
I was one minute into the video and I immediately knew that this guy knows what he is talking about and is a good lecturer. After having seen more of him, I can say I wasn*t wrong and thanks for sharing these nice lectures!
This course is an incredible gift.
Thank you, MIT. You are truly generous.
Thank you, Barton Zwiebach. You are a master teacher, brilliant, and rare indeed.
Thank you, TH-cam/Google. These are not only not evil, but actually, positively good.
Gracias por representarnos tan bien profesor! Saludos de un peruano terminando su maestría en Alemania
He's amazing, i wish someone told me MIT uploaded their lectures while i started my BSc in Physics back in 2016. I used to search for quantum mechanics lectures and TH-cam would never suggest me this. Then last year a friend of mine showed me the path to Quantum enlightenment with 8.04 and i haven't been the same.
I guess I'm lucky as I'll be starting my BSc this year.
@@physicalanish i am starting my btech this year but still learning this
evey secound of this vidio is more valuable than gold to me .thank you mit
brilliant brilliant lecture. Thanks Dr. Zwiebach and MIT for making this available for free!
I learned so much from Dr. Zwiebach, he is an amazing lecturer!!
Dr. Zwiebach just published his textbook "Mastering Quantum Mechanics". It covers the material in 8.04,8.05,and 8.06. The book is worth the price.
now i can finally tell my friends that I'm doing some MIT courses :)
I am Indian. Sir, your teaching Method is unique than other
I am an MS Physics student and I now know what I will be watching this summer. Thank you for this lecture, the professor is a wonderful lecturer.
what an excellent professor!! Greatness..even the introduction, the discussion, the ending ..superb!...so satisfactory
Happy Valentine's to you too!!!!
No idea what he is saying but I love his presentation. I know for sure that he is giving an excellent explanation to those who understand what he is saying.
Yes, i can confirm he is giving an excellent explanation
In short: You have a solution to a simple system, but now you want to solve a more complex system that you either don't know how to solve, or the method of solution is too complicated for you to be able to do that. So what you do? You add an extra term that you believe is a good guess of what the more complex system might do, and you add this extra term with a "tweak" (the lambda), so that you could start with your simple solution and gradually "tweak in" this extra term to see how it changes the solution and whether it meets the requirements of the solution that you're looking for. You tweak it back and forth until you find the best match (e.g. the lowest energy state, which is usually what nature would choose as well as the best solution), and you have a working model for your complex system.
30mins ago I was watching my Sagittarius star sign reading, then I watched the top 10 foods to eat in London, I've watched a poker vlogger in Vegas....and now I'm here. I think I've stumbled into matter way above my station. He might as well be speaking Japanese, I don't understand any of it....but I wish I did.
Well, you could but it's a lot of work.
I can speak fluent Japanese and I can also understand this. All you need is to motivate yourself and remember what your goal is. What are you trying to achieve from learning perturbation theory? For me, it crosses into my interests of mathematics, linguistics and computer science. If you want to learn Japanese at some point, I have advice for that as well.
What advice can you give about learning Japanese? I am very passionate about learning new languages, have a nice day :)
putting the video in 1.25 speed really improve the pace of the presentation.
Thanks 😀
Never thought of doing that, thank you so much
After watching even just this first lecture, Quantum Physics III(!) at MIT is exactly as difficult as I imagined it would be.
oh, FINALLY, I need it for my exam in 2 weeks. Zwiebach is a great Professor
When did I understand a harmonic oscillator?
When your alarm clock went ring a ding ding.
Durp Durper alright, since you can make it simple, is there any way to fit all the theory given in this particular lecture in one simple life example which would be explicit enough for a non-academic person.
I mean it would be easy to follow if a lecturer would show how this theory can be applied to a real life problem, either from technology or business field.
Yeah, you chicken dance until you get real good at it.. or collapse, or something, or something else. Let's find out shall we.
You need to have a certain level of physics understanding before watching these videos. SHOs are the most basic example of a Hamiltonian. I'd suggest watching some lower level physics stuff first. Maybe watch a series over classical mechanics first.
@@JohnFerrier Thanks!
Sir it's my humble request to make videos on the course of relativistic quantum mechanics..... your lecture is awesome sir..just awesome .....its my request to mit.... it'll help a lot
OMG, I AM GONNA LOCK MYSELF UP FOR THIS!!!!
III Playlist Length: 29 hours 49 mins
Please please, release a course on quantum information! Then everything will be perfect!
there are a lot of those in edx
This made my day
Love from India 🇮🇳
wow, great Quantum mechanics 3. Thankyou MIT. Thanks Barton Zwiebach
He's from my country, it's an honor
Question for the part discussed at 17:06 , should the index k not start with k=0, so k element of [0,1,.....( ?
I just got confused here, because the comparison of the Energies starts for k=0: E(0,0)
waiting for relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory
Welp. This is exactly what I needed see'ing that Im in quantum II this semester :)
I love you MIT
Thank you Dr. Zweibach
Just the time I needed to infinity frequency harmonics
Zwiebach coming back!!!
Can I learn QED after this course or are there any more prerequisites?
If you know special relativity and a bit of tensor analysis, you're good to go. I would also recommend going through relativistic QM.
Love this professor.
Next QFT courses by mit please
Here is what we have for Quantum Mechanic courses on MIT OpenCourseWare: ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=science&subcat=physics&spec=quantummechanics We hope some of these are of interest. :)
Please tell me in mit is there any courses on classical field theory ?
You are superb sir..
I applied to the institute. They'll publish the decisions in 2 hours, and I'm watching this to send positive thoughts to universe :D
@@MustafaBerkeGureltol oh man feel sorry for u. Where are u now tho?
@@re7alia7or I got into UMass Amherst Computer Science major.
@@MustafaBerkeGureltol oh that's great! Good luck with your studies!
@@re7alia7or Thanks! You can follow this channel for the updates with my computer game project.
@@MustafaBerkeGureltol That's funny, I applied to MIT last year too and got rejected. Also at UMass! (Boston)
just to high civilization and independent is 2 different issue. civilization link to the rule and order. if on rule and order. we need international police can enforce the rule . to protect the weak . independent link to lawless on bully mindset.
Great lecture
I am in grade 7 and understood
Lovely, Thank you kindly.
One dimension in the spectral state
Means eigenvalues follow a general para meter?Thanks but getting first view wrong interpretati o ns
Thank u so much for the constructive lessons
Alllow me to ask u Please when always be On (0) means: where can we find independence? Is there such When comparing? Could u Please guide me maybe a previous lesson or books to reach a better understanding mainly in Hamilton's-oscillations-eigeinvalues function?
Thanks!!
Any undergraduate classical mechanics book. Maybe the Mary Boas mathematical methods book can help
@@JohnFerrier Thanks for your answer
Go MIT!
the most priceless videos have the lowest amount of views.... how ironic!
That could actually be helpful if we could sort the TH-cam by the number of views, from LEAST views to most. Then all videos appreciated by smart people would be on the top of that list :J
thats pure gold
@4:20 where the math starts.
@15:38. NDPT
People who disliked better to meet psychologist....
you save my life.
super clear Thank you
if we face the trouble . we hope someone can hlep us.
Curves that has energy
This guy is really first-rate, but I've got a slightly different question. What I want to know is, What does it cost us that we don't have an intellectual bridge over the very tiny but ver-ree deep chasm between the areas of industry where the quantum view is useful and the rest of real life where we live in billiard ball physics at voltages between about one and the latest in high-tension transmission lines?*
As theories go, the Standard Model is pretty good. It gives us replicable numbers out to twenty significant digits or so, and it lets us mix the chemicals and what-not in ways that make an advanced industrial economy tick over nicely, thank you very much. So it has some problems? Like e.g. a total 100% inability to explain Bell's Inequality and a 99.44% likelihood of drifting off into mindless blither when anybody tries? So what?
That's my question. Where is it costing us spondulix that we can't explain the two-slit-experiment? Where there's money on the line is where we'll find the intellectual band-aids to get us through the next generation of our view of physical reality.
__________________
* There is a good fix for this supposed chasm, using the explanation that quantum reality is everywhere, it's everywhere, all the way up.
I.I.Rabi famously calculated the likelihood of a normal masonry brick levitating a foot (a measure of length used in the United States, Liberia and Saudi Arabia) in the air in any given second. For an encore, he did the Heisenberg uncertainties relevant to trying to drive a ten-foot truck through a nine-foot gap. Both calculations come up with numbers like once in ten to the Q times the age of the universe, with Q being, uh, rather large numbers.
The excellent Jim El-Khalili, who is well overdue to become Sir James, has some good lectures, e.g. th-cam.com/video/wwgQVZju1ZM/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=TheRoyalInstitution, on a parallel theme, that we see quantum effects at human scales in biology. (Google him: I think he might be in the running to be the Carl Sagan of the present generation of public science.)
Neither of these life-rafts of sanity, however, comes with an answer to the intellectual challenge of Bell and those pesky interference patterns.
God damn this guy is amazing
Does anyone know what happens next?
TH-cam playlist: th-cam.com/play/PLUl4u3cNGP60Zcz8LnCDFI8RPqRhJbb4L.html
View the course materials: ocw.mit.edu/8-06S18
Best wishes on your studies!
So we find energy we have all Quantum computing
ANY BODE HAVE LECTURE ABOUT PERTERBUTION IN CLASSICAL MECHANICS GOLDSTEIN
merci
Mathematicians surely have a different understanding of degeneracy ^^
@C Malb maybe stop smoking for a while
@C Malb 1 year ago. like i remember xd
the topic should on the civilization. this link to rule and order set by the world leader. every country need to adhere the rule based policy. it is nothing on independent state issue. this prevent a military strong country. invade small country. UN is a civilization organisation we cannot stay alone. like nothing happen to us. we need to care for each other. having the same mindset on understanding live in this civilization. if nonindependent(selfish), the military strong country will invade the weaker country. like rusia invade ukrine. or china invade some big country draw the new desk line in asia. to invade a small country resources. this will bring us back to soviet era. big fish eat small fish.no more justice . this make ppl live in slavery life. this is not the way for civilization. just to highlight civilization and independent is 2 different issues. civilisation link to rule and order. independent link to self fish behaviour.we are living in same world. any thing happen will affect our survival. no country can alone.
Countries invading other countries is actually more likely to happen when people undertake a hive mindset like the one you're postulating, because then they become more prone to be manipulated by their leaders to do awful things when convinced by them that it's "for the greater good" (which is usually just their leader's and his close comrades' good, at the cost of both the citizens as well as those they help invading). This likelihood becomes smaller when people are able to think independently of each other and exchange their ideas freely, and when countries can work independently of each other, because then if some country is doing stupid things, it deteriorates, and other countries see that it's stupid and learn their lesson on someone else's mistake instead of on their own's. And the country that is doing bad has a lot of other countries to look up to if they want to fix their own issues. It's like a free market of ideas, and a free market of solutions for how a country should be run in order to prosper. Merging countries into bigger countries usually makes things worse in the same way monopolies ruin the market. It might seem to work better in the beginning, but soon enough everything starts to go south, and that's why all the greatest empires from the past have fallen. They were too big and monolithic to support their own weight. We observe the same phenomenon in biology: cells don't grow endlessly, because their needs grow proportionally to their volume (that is, as x³), but their ability to transfer nutrients in and waste material out through the surface of their membrane is only proportional to the surface of that membrane (that is, as x²). So as their surface area grows to balance the volume, it begins to fold and ultimately it must split into two to keep the balance. The same principle applies to countries and their boundaries.
-10 pts to whatever physicist missed the opportunity to call "sophisticated degenerate perturbation theory" as "very degenerate perturbation theory"
19:40
1:39
do students record this secretly?
Yes, and they smuggle it on mules :J
Lovely
hi
Why do they still use chalk in 2019?
@@peterjack2323 I agree!
Because it's cheap and it works.
ami porate chai
bruh i dont understand this for shit. i just played the video cuz its boring so i can fall asleep
Did it work?
❤
❤❤❤👍
cool