I would like to thank all of you subscribers for cracking the 50,000 subscribers total! In fact it reached that milestone 2 hours before uploading this video! We also went over 8 million views this week as well, so we must be doing something right!
@@Islamisthecultofsin But its entirely a different perspective in Islamic Cult Jesus will come and kill pigs and Break cross Abolish jizya Entirely Muhammad says lord Jesus converted himself to a Muslim What a joke
@@Islamisthecultofsin Yes. But for Islamic Haddith Its entirely different Jesus will kill the jews and Christians and He will have wife and die And rise alive Stupid doctrine
People do Prefer TRUTHS , PROOFS & FACTS . And you Have it All Dr.Jay and AL-FADI ! Thank you Guys! Great work! That is why many subscribers now! Congrats!
Thanks Dr. Jay for these nuggets. Number 14 in the series. More grace Sir to you, Al Fadi, Murad, Hatun, the Pfander family and other brothers and sisters in Christ engaged in apologetics
@@oneone3763 This is not an intellectual debate. It is about the Truth and its absoluteness. It is not about winning debates. What exactly is in Islam that you willing to pledge your eternity for? I pray for you to see your sinful nature and come to the saving grace of Jesus. As for Mohammed, who has led so many people astray, his reward is waiting for him
I'm convinced, Prophet Muhammad according to the books created during the times of Abbasid (Sirah and Hadith) is a mythical-legend figure, created by the Abbasid Chaliphate.
@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated The Science of Hadiths is over 1200 yrs old and been proved over and over, OVER the centuries...the Isnad - chain of narrators to the source have been thoroughly studied by scholars and hundreds of 1000's of hadiths have been scrutinized and graded to be classified... ANY HADITH, any, even Sahih hadiths that have a good Isnad MUST BE ACCORDING TO THE QURAN in order to be accepted.
@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated The people of Mohammad (saw) time and the 4 generations thereafter, the rightly guided, meaning: * the 10 000 companions/disciples of Mohammad (saw), the Sahabas, * the Tabie-een, scholars who were taught by the Sahabas * and the Tabie'een - Tabie'een - those who were taught by the Tabie'een... were ALL Quran only...as they could relate to the life and example of Mohammad (saw) and his practices...but when they died out and Islam started to expand to Non-Arabian lands -that gap of 250 yrs, Muslims like Bukhari, Muslim, Abu-Dawood and many other, made it their life duty to collect EVERYTHING they could find on Mohammad (saw)... These collections of Statements, Testimonies, Reports (meaning of the word hadith) were made by all kinds of people, from Muslims, Jews, Xtians and even from enemies of Islam were classified, numbered and graded by scholars using the Isnad method. THIS METHOD is the best to get to the truth and sources, as each of the narrators in that chain is investigated if they were truthful in everything or otherwise....also different reports (hadiths) on the same topic are compared...it takes a Muslim scholar today 3-4 yrs at University to learn the Science of Hadiths. YES - tons of hadiths are fabricated and some are listed as "Mawḍū' also included in Hadith books and studied - as other information therein is correct but the 'crux' or the vital part is made-up and not true. IN REALITY this amounts to 0,01% of all hadiths as the other 99.99% is accepted by Muslims as it is according to Quranic teaching and Elaborate and compliment the Quran.
Thanks Brother Al Fadi and Dr Jay.Watching your livestreams keeps me on the edge of my chair and I know bombshells of vital information will be dropped.The extent of desperation by the adherents is beyond imagination.Keep up the good work.
@@aaaabraham837 Pfander films had 8 million views, and yes if you have the facts why don't you debunk them .The tag line they are telling lies is old and stale Ya Akhi.Come up with something novel and groundbreaking.Bless your heart.
@@aaaabraham837 Show me evidence.Anybody can say anything.I am a researcher myself but not in religion, and yes I would appreciate if you could show respect and not call me gullible.Is that what your faith teaches you??? Dear brother in humanity.
Pray the true God finds any Muslim watching this video but struggling with family because of generational tradition of faith and culture hindering you from the THE TRUTH
To the honorable Muslim reading this, do you confess today to the Creator of the Universe that.. 1. Adam was made from Clay? 2. That life was breathed into him by the Word-"Be"? 3. Do you confess that Qabil tried to atone for his works with his Labour/his own Works from the field; that was insufficient? 4. Do you confess to The Creator that Habil used an innocent, spotless lamb that God provided to atone for his sin? 5. Is this Qurbani/Udhiyah? 6. Do you admit that all those that got into Nuhs Ark were saved? 7. That those who thought a global flood would be impossible, were not saved? 8. Do you accept that God asked Ibrahim to bind his son? 9. Is that proof that Ibrahim loved his God? 10. Is Isa the "Kalimatullah" as mentioned in Qur'an 3:45 and 4:171? (Translation "Word of God") When you speak, your words are you, they hold all the authority of your body and mind but are completely different medium. The Word of God became flesh in to Jesus Christ, who died on the Cross as the Lamb of God, the Qurbani/Udhiyah/Sacrifice for all mankind. I know what you are going to say, "God can not be a man". But you admit that God can enter creation, as he did when he spoke to Musa as a burning bush. If God can be talking fire, he can become a talking piece of clay. *Checkmate* I have done exactly as Qur'an 5:47 instructs me. I judged Islam to be false.
@@silverltc2729 Jesus is one of the greatest prophets that God created. God has created and gave life to many spiritual teachers and prophets from, Adam , Buddha, Confucius, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad and so on. Many of their words have been altered by the Romans. Greeks, political groups, and others to suit their ambitions.
Interesting point, he had many wives whom he got one daughter if my memory is correct and no son in spite of the tradition telling us he was able to have sex many times each day of his life as a prophet. I remember one Saudi Arabia king got 80 kids from his wives.
AMEN HALLELUJAH GLORY TO GOD GREAT IS YOUR FAITHFULNESS TO ME IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS CHRIST 🙏🙏🙏🙏Each and every day, I do my best to share these awesome and powerful messages without fear and shame to the lost
Your mention of brigands raise a thought. There are aspects of the Koran that would be very useful for a tribe of brigands to believe. A tribe of brigands would need every fighter it could get. All the offers of slave girls and come to think of it 72 virgins on death would be very useful in getting uneducated teenage boys to fight. All the hatred of other religions would further incite them to fight. But they'd take a lot of casualties, fighting all the time. So they'd need the women to produce as many replacements as possible. hence girls would be married at puberty, or to be on the safe side a bit before. but who to? with the young men away fighting and so many dead there wouldn't be enough men to go round. Answer- the women have to share husbands. This can be spun to the teenagers as them getting four wives- which they will if they survive the fighting, and after having spent half their "adult" life as single warriors.
If he is not Muhammad the prophet of Islam than a question should be asked as to who that Saracen prophet actually is, as he is described in the Doctrina Iacobi.
@@oneone3763 There were quite a few letters by Paul, and also some elements of biography in Acts of the Apostles, so there was evidence back in the 1C that could be contested, if it were a fiction. The letters have common characteristics, so the same personality is there to see. Also he teaches certain supernatural aspects of the gospel, that have been witnessed, so he was bringing church revelations out. Whereas "Mohammed" of the Quran is not authenticated - no location, background that people would have been able to check up on, in the 7C. This Doctrina Jacobi that many muslims would like to be about Mohammed, does not fit, such as this self-proclaimed prophet speaking Aramaic and being in the wrong place and not having the same message. Jay is also saying this figure was a bit of a brute, so would you want to accept that as being the warner-messenger of the Quran? As in any theoretical "last prophet" would surely be living by high standards.
@@collybever The book of acts is written by an ananymous author. He tried to make a connection between the letters and gospels and made a figure up based on Josephus. Both Paul and Josephus were Roman citizens. Both Paul and Josephus were Pharisees Both spent time as Roman prisoners. Paul was originally named Saul. Titus Flavius Josephus was formally Joseph ben Matityahu. Paul was a former persecutor of Christians. Josephus had been an enemy of Rome. Paul said that circumcision was not required for Gentile Christians. Josephus maintained that non-Jews did not require circumcision in order to stay among Jews. Paul was 'caught away to the third heaven' Josephus had prophetic dreams. Paul made a defense of Christianity before Agrippa II. Josephus appealed to Agrippa II to attest the truth of what he had written in his history of the Roman/Jewish wars. Both had a friend named Epaphroditus.
There's something I don't understand. Muslims have every right to defend their beliefs on channels like this one, especially if they do it with integrity. What genuinely confuses me is when certain ones completely ignore the actual content of the video and instead begin spamming the comments section with completely unrelated information. Not only does this diminish the credibility of other Muslims by making them look like trolls that lack any legitimate defense of the religion, but it literally inflates engagement with the video, causing the algorithm to spread and promote it even more. Maybe they don't realize they're actually helping to boost the popularity of channels and content they don't agree with, but it's always baffled me. It's the TH-cam equivalent of free advertising.
@Todd Beamer Hmm. That's really interesting. I don't think I've heard any Muslims making that claim, but I guess it's possible. Christianity has different sects with various rules and expectations and I often wonder if the same applies to the followers of Islam. I was thinking that maybe it's cathartic for some of them to be sort of a nuisance to channels like this, or at the very least to cast a shadow of doubt on certain Christian beliefs, but I can't be sure. It just seems incredibly counterproductive. Especially when you factor in monetization, which gives that type of spamming the added benefit of putting money into the pockets of their detractors.
This video doesn't deserve an intellectual response. Two clowns behind their laptop use in every video different criteria. Their criteria is that they set criteria that will always lead to a rejection. Once they will make an objective video of their methodology and criteria we will respond.
@Todd Beamer The more I think on it, your comment makes a lot of sense and fills in a few blanks for me. I've had a lot of Muslims reply to comments I've made on videos like this, but I can hardly think of a single one who addressed their grievances with whatever I said in "an intellectual" manner. They usually just insult or call me a liar and then hurl totally unrelated accusations about Christianity my way and attempt to goad me into defending those instead. Fascinating. It's still not helping the cause of Islam, though. Because in addition to boosting the spread of these videos, the fact that they don't provide a viable argument for what's said here will only ensure that any Muslims harboring doubts about the religion will find zero rebuttals to the tough questions, thereby causing them to have even greater doubts and bringing them one step closer to leaving the faith.
@Todd Beamer There is nothing to learn in these video's. They are low level propaganda video's. Only people with desires like you come to these channels to 'learn'. Muslims use their intellect. That's why we don't believe in the trinity. You don't use your intellect that's why you believe in the trinity.
@Todd Beamer Yes, I'm well aware of the jihad part. That adds up completely. What doesn't is basically what my original comment is about. In their attempt to prevent criticism of Islam from being disseminated, they're achieving the very opposite here, because the algorithm doesn't differentiate between positive or negative engagement. All engagement is good engagement on TH-cam. Oh well. They have every right to do it either way, but thanks for explaining that for me. 🙏🏻
I have worked my way through this series and I have found it to be very interesting. I am not religious - I was not born with that gene - so I do not place any single religion on a pedestal; all are subject to profound criticism from my point of view - though I would like to stress that I try not to be dismissive of people who have faith in a higher power simply because they are people of faith and are therefore in some way intellectually inferior. To me, seeking solace and a sense of belonging seems to be a very human thing to do. It’s what usually comes after that leaves me cold. So I’ve worked my way through these talks and everything I have heard seems to correlate and expand upon points I first encountered when reading Tom Holland’s “In the Shadow of the Sword”. The complete absence of external, independent historical evidence for the existence of Mohammad seems incredible. Particularly when considering that this was taking place in a far more recent period of history when compared to the Old or New Testaments. I understand that different regions progress at different rates, and have different traditions regarding the dissemination of information; but this utter absence of external corroborating evidence is truly unusual. As is the traditional narrative of an origin for which there is no archaeological support, but there are multiple far more likely explanations. It really does set Islam apart. That is not to say that the Old and New Testaments are without fault. It is very hard to find any hard historical facts to support anything in the Old Testament preceding the enslavement of the Jews in Babylon. And the historicity of the New Testament’s version of events almost entirely begins and ends with the execution of Jesus. But Islam’s rejection of rational explanations for which there are credible ancient and modern explanations in favour of less likely and intellectually inconsistent arguments seems to be deeply problematic. When coupled with an iteration of god for whom there is no absolute right or wrong, only the (interpreted) will of god; and a strong tendency to look backwards when challenged, this becomes legitimately concerning. Particularly when followers may be looking back on a past that did not exist. What sort of guidance will that provide? Though I cannot help but think that not matter how reasonably these challenges are articulated, nothing will change when the challenges to orthodoxy come from outsiders. The questions will have to come from within Islam for anything to change. Hopefully for the better of all.
References to Muhammad claiming to hold the keys to paradise can actually be found in Islamic traditions. There is a piece written by Sean W Anthony called "Muḥammad, the Keys to Paradise, and the Doctrina Iacobi: A Late Antique Puzzle". One such tradition goes like this, I copy from Sean W Anthony here, Muhammad says: "I will be the first to exit the grave when they are resurrected; I will be their leader once they arrive; I will address them as they hearken; I will be their mediator when they are imprisoned; and I will bring good-tidings when they are struck dumb with fear. On that day the banner of nobility, the keys to paradise, and the banner of praise shall be in my hands."
@@Arsalan5431 is that Isaiah 14:13? “You said in your heart, “I will ascend to the heavens; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of Mount Zaphon.”
@@Arsalan5431 oh I get it, one must also include the preceding verse “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!”
Look I love your work, but I respectfully disagree. Muhammad was real; he was a prophet; he was the object of this letter, but I think his religion was very different than Islam. I think later Muslims simply built Islam on the foundations of the real Muhammad, who was a heretical Christian (promoting a different Christos to come). Just as the Quran is a later compilation, the traditional Muhammad (the one we know today) was compiled over time until they had invented the "tradition." It's as if someone built a religion around David Koresh decades later. There was a real Koresh, but they'd invent a new one to better fit their needs. That's what they did here. In Christianity, the earliest texts support the basics of Christianity. Here, the earliest texts prove it was a completely different religion that only later became Islam.
@@Billy-Mandalay Sorry I was unclear: I agree w/ their general critique of the standard narrative; I disagree w/ their claims on this particular document. I think the real Muhammad was a heretical Christian brigand who probably conquered/dominated a significant portion of the Arab world; later, Muslims built upon him - and other myths w/ new ones thrown in - to create the standard narrative. So, I think the standard narrative is false, but I think it has more factual basis than they do. He was a self-proclaimed "prophet"; he was a monotheist; he did conquer various things (what & when & how may be unclear), but the prophet of Islam didn't exist - it's more of a "based on a true story" kind of thing. Unlike Christianity, Islam begins w/ one story & gets another decades later. Christian, of course, can trace their basic beliefs back to Christ's resurrection, and there's literally no contrary evidence (no evidence we ever told a different story).
But there were Jewish tribes in Medina. SIN says Mohamed made a pact with them and later destroyed them after a battle, of the trench I think, from memory, And of course being a merchant travelling on his camels he traveled north to Aramaic speaking country and would have learned Aramaic,the lingua Franca if the region for thousands of years. Plus did he not have a Christian monk as a close elder sort of mentor ? He too would have spoken Aramaic, no ? So other arguments seem fine but not the Aramaic one, your thoughts ??? Ps: Aramaic back then should be seen as english today, everyone who learns or travels learns some just to communicate and get by.
@Baji Scipio Darayav Aurelius Julian Venizelos Nalwa You have missed that this series has kept consistent is that Islam post dates 650 CE. No one has found reference to anything Islamic pre 650 CE. That means Islamic teachings were not in existence when this was written.
The claims so far are very audacious. Let's have the end game in your opinion. Give us a time-line of history since 600. What happened on the military, religious and cultural levels?
@@Bei-Abedan We can't assume things right. We have to go by scripture evidence in your methodology. There are no manuscripts of the Talmud before the 9th century. There is no Tanakh before 200 bc. We have to reject all biblical prophets. The oral tradition of islam is million times superior to the oral tradition of judaism.
@@oneone3763 As I always try to remind everyone, I don't have a methodology except Judaism. I am an enemy to the Abbasids and do not trust anything which passed through the hands of anyone who acknowledged the Abbasid Caliphs. This is not a methodology, this is a opposition. But you elevate Abbasid sources while I elevate Jewish sources. Although I do not understand why you don't believe in the prophets. Is there any common ground between us? If not then there is no conversation possible between us. You are correct that a book called the TaNaKh did not exist before 2ndC.AD but my sect is a branch of the Romaniote Jews who use the Septuagint.
@@Bei-Abedan I don't elevate Abbasids sources. I elevate muslim reliable sources which are million times more reliable than the talmud and the Septaguint. There is no common ground between me and you.
@@davidchase1439 i have no problem with that, my problem if Jesus is sitting on the right hand of his father and if Jesus is God that makes two gods sitting beside each other not one god , my question to you where the holy spirit will be sitting ?
@@davidchase1439. listen to what you saying both are Gods when you use the word both you mean 2 thank you just prove my point. but my question was what happened to your holy spirit where he will be sitting according to your fabricated doctrine they should be all the time together, is he on vacation on the most important day which is the day of judgement? now give me one verse in your entire corrupted book that the three are one meaning god the father god the son and god the holy spirit are not three gods but one, if not give me one verse where Jesus said I am god or worship me? do you know the difference between polytheism and monotheism?
Jay Smith Embarrassing mistakes on the bogus history of Dome of the rock 1). First big Mistakes forgetting the Crusader Abdul Malik bin Marwan was the fifth caliph of the Umayyads dynasty. Jay Smit praised him as “the great Arab reformer", because Abdul Malik created Muhammad and Islam out of nothing, totally from thin air .... Hahaha. He created Muhammad by ordering people to write the name Muhammad on the dome of the rock. Once Muhammad was created by Abdul Malik, then suddenly Quran miraculously come into existence complete 114 chapters...hahaha. Abdul Malik then ordered people to write some inscription from Quranic verses he just created on various wals of some of the rock. On the south wall, people wrote these verses In the name of God, the Merciful the Compassionate. There is no god but God. He is One. He has no associate. Unto Him belongeth sovereignity and unto Him belongeth praise. He quickeneth and He giveth death; and He has Power over all things. Muhammad is the servant of God and His Messenger. Note : You can check all inscriptions on dome on the rock on Islamic awareness website. The problem is When creating his bogus Islamic history, Jay Smith Ph.D.seems to forget that, when the Crusaders conquered Jerusalem in 1099, after bloody massacre of jew and Muslims. The crusader then gave the Dome of the Rock to the Augustinians, who turned it into a church named The Templum Domini. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templum_Domini This Church became an important symbol of Jerusalem, depicted on coins minted under the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem. Jay Smith PhD then create a bogus story that Abdul Malik has ordered people to write down some inscriptions on the wall of dome of the rock ambulatory. That inscription includes an explicit rejection of the divinity of Christ, People of the Book, do not go to excess in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary, a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’- stop, that is better for you- God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust. Do you think is it possible the writings against Christianity were left untouched by the crusaders for hundreds of years inside the church Templum Domini, and survive to the preset day?. That's impossible....hahaha. Please read the story of crusader conquest of Jerusalem I don't believe Arab Christians at that time didn't understand the verses that contradicted the divinity of Jesus. Judging from the story of Jewish and Muslim massacre during Jerusalem conquest, it is impossible the writings against Christianity were left untouched inside the church Templum Domini located at the center in area ruled by crusaders. After nearly a hundred years under Crusader rule, on October 2, 1187, Muslim army under Saladin, reconquered Jerusalem. Saladin turned the dome of the rock into a Muslim shrine. Many of the Mameluke, Abbasid and Ottoman sultans who ruled after Saladin, made many changes to the dome of the rock. Therefore, The Dome of the Rock was built by the Umayyad caliph Abdul al-Malik but the famous inscription on the dome ambulatory was made by Abbasid caliph Al-Ma'mun (r. 813-833) during whose reign renovations took place. Al-Mamun name is written along with the inscriptions of famous Qur'anic verses, all written in the Kufic script. The biggest change was made by the 16th-century Ottoman sultan Suleyman the Magnificent, who decorated it with Quranic Inscriptions in Tuluth Arabic Script and Turkish faience tiles. 2). St John of Damascus called Muslims “Saracens” and Mohammed a “false prophet” The biggest earliest critique of Islam is John of Damascus or St. John of Damascus, (Eastern and Western feast day December 4). He was born c. 675, Damascus and died December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. He life during Abdul Malik reign and quite close from the time of prophet death in 632 AD. Jhon of Damascus is a Christian saint who well known as the first Christian polemicist. How it is possible this Christian Saint criticized Islam if Mohammad doesn’t exist. In his book The Fountain of Wisdom, in the second part he wrote Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon) - the last chapter of this part (Chapter 101) deals with the Heresy of the Ishmaelite. He explicitly wrote About Muhammad and Islam, like this a) Agarenes, Ishmaelites and Saracens, There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, [who] was born to Abraham of Agar, and for this reason they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also called Saracens, which is derived from Sarras kenoi, or destitute of Sara, because of what Agar said to the angel: ‘Sara hath sent me away destitute.’ [99] b) called Muhammad was a False Prophet who Life During The Time of Heraclius These used to be idolaters and worshiped the morning star and Aphrodite, whom in their own language they called Khabár, which means great. [100] And so down to the time of Heraclius they were very great idolaters. From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, [101] devised his own heresy. c) He tell very famous story about Muhammad propagated by Christian polemicist As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, to each one of which he set a title. For example, there is the book On Woman, [109] in which he plainly makes legal provision for taking four wives and, if it be possible, a thousand concubines-as many as one can maintain, besides the four wives. He also made it legal to put away whichever wife one might wish, and, should one so wish, to take to oneself another in the same way. Mohammed had a friend named Zeid. This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love. Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said: ‘Oh, by the way, God has commanded me to take your wife.’ The other answered: ‘You are an apostle. Do as God has told you and take my wife.’ Rather-to tell the story over from the beginning-he said to him: ‘God has given me the command that you put away your wife.’ And he put her away. Then several days later: ‘Now,’ he said, ‘God has commanded me to take her.’ Then, after he had taken her and committed adultery with her, he made this law: ‘Let him who will put away his wife. And if, after having put her away, he should return to her, let another marry her. For it is not lawful to take her unless she have been married by another. Furthermore, if a brother puts away his wife, let his brother marry her, should he so wish.’ [110] In the same book he gives such precepts as this: ‘Work the land which God hath given thee and beautify it. And do this, and do it in such a manner” [111]-not to repeat all the obscene things that he did. Sorthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx On Catholics Ensyclopedia you can find a short paragraph on Jhon of Damascus about Islam and Muhammad. The second part, "Concerning Heresy", is little more than a copy of a similar work by Epiphanius, brought up to date by John Damascene. The author indeed expressly disclaims originality except in the chapters devoted to Islamism, Iconoclasm, and Aposchitae. To the list of eighty heresies that constitute the "Panarion" of Epiphanius, he added twenty heresies that had sprung up since his time. In treating of Islamism he vigorously assails the immoral practices of Mohammed and the corrupt teachings inserted in the Koran to legalize the delinquencies of the prophet www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm Conclusion So, St John of Damascus called Muslims “Saracens”, “Ishmaelites” and “Agarenes”, except that the “Saracens” designation might have been used earlier. All those names were pejorative. he also called Muhammad by name five times and he also called Mohammed a false prophet. He vigorously assails the immoral practices of Mohammed and the corrupt teachings inserted in the Koran to legalize the delinquencies of the prophet How could a Christian Saint, who live a few decades after prophet death, vigorously assails Islam and Muhammad, but Muhammad didn’t exist.... ha ha ha. 3). Third fatal mistakes listen to this expert Watch this videos showing Jay Smith panel of dubious expert when working th-cam.com/video/B29OqXQqEds/w-d-xo.html So it is murrad who proposed Muhammad is Yesus... Hahaha. I have advice them, You guys had better check the healthiness of your mind to the nearest dentist or veterinarian .... Hahaha Jay Smith PhD listens to the opinions of this strange dubious expert. That’s why so many mad videos he produced ... hehehe. Jays put a big lie that Muhammad is Jesus and therefore, St. Jhon of Damascus attack this Muhammad who are Jesus himself A Christian Saint attack Jesus ... how stupid So Jay Smith big lies has been perfectly debunked ... hahaha.
I think you are going too fast. The location is not relevant. The description is seen through the eyes of a christian who thinks in terms of the second coming. He can quite easily be projecting his own beliefs onto the reports he has heard which are obviously sketchy. Maybe reports of Mohammeds death had not reached him either. Yes it is plausible that the Arabs were led by an arab christian monotheist. There seems to have been some kind of revelation that was subsequently polluted abd overlaid with vicious trash manufactured as occasion demanded. I think you have not allowed for the jacobi text being filtered through christian eyes. And as for "everyone" being a prophet - that wont do. Who were "mohammed's" rivals - if he had any. You cant just say "everyone"
Test for identify a true christian believer Gospel of Mark 16:17-18 Jesus said, the believers in my name they can cast out devils, and they can speak with new tongues, and they can pick up snakes with their hands and if they drink any deadly poison it will not hurt them at all and if they will place their hands on sick people they will get well. can you imagine, it's possible? is that any christian believer who can do this ? even in Hollywood films they can't produce such a man who can do this things.
@Umar Ali Why are you using that which Christian scholars have pointed out was an addition to the text and is marked by a foot note stating that these verses are NOT found in early Greek manuscripts? If you wish to deal with the information from scripture try Matthew 28.
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Contradictions and errors in the Bible Ezra 2:65 they were 200 singing men and singing women. Nehemiah 7:67 they were 245 singing men and singing women. context is the same but numbers are different. 2 Kings 24:8 Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem 3 months. 2 Chronicles 36:9 Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned 3 months and 10 days in Jerusalem. this two verse is the same but numbers are different. 1 Kings 7:26 he had 2000 baths. 2 Chronicles 4:5 he had 3000 baths. in Solomon's temple how many baths he had ? Leviticus 11:1-6 God said to Moses and Aaron the camel, hyrax, rabbit is chews the cud therefore it is unclean for you. can you imagine that does camel, hyrax, rabbit chews the cud ? is that a market for animals to sell cud?
Hi bro, are you the new kilapah? Come on, don't be shy to acknowledge that there's no proof (scripts or artefacts) about abdul's book from the 7tn century 😴
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
1 Chronicles 16:30 Bible says the world does not move. it's scientific errors in the Bible! Hebrews 1:10-11, Psalms 102:25-26 this verse says the heavens and the earth they will perish Ecclesiastes 1:4, Psalms 78:69 this verse says the earth remains forever. earth will perish or remain forever ? Job 26:11 The pillars of the heavens quake. heavens have got pillars ? Job 9:6, Psalms 75:3 this verse says the earth have got pillars. it's scientific error !!! Genesis 1:29 God says all plants they are food for you! Today science proved that they are many poisonous plants if you eat you will die. how God of the Bible doesn't know that ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Bible says the Sun is walking! Bible clearly says that the Sun is going down and clearly says the Sun is moving! Ecclesiastes 1:5 The Sun also ariseth, and the Sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose. Job 9:7 Which commandeth the Sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars. Deuteronomy 24:15 At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the Sun go down upon it. Judges 9:33 And it shall be, that in the morning, as soon as the Sun is up, thou shalt rise early, and set upon the city.
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Matthew 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli. Look carefully to this two verse, Mathew says Joseph father was Jacob but Luke says Joseph father was Heli. Who is the father of Joseph? or Joseph had two father?
In Jewish literature, grandfather is not used. A father in the line could be grandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfather, etc. Just as Abraham was the father of the people of Israel.
@@forthwithtx5852 Jesus had 4 father ? Matthew 1:1 Jesus Christ is the son of David and the son of Abraham. Luke 3:23 Jesus is a son of Joseph. Mark 1:1 Jesus is the son of God. who is the father of Jesus ? is Jesus only the son of God? Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son. Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God. who is really the son of God ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Muhammad is He who is in mathew Mathew 5 : 11 God blesses you when people moke you, persecute you and lie about you and say all sorts of evil things against you because you are my followers .Be happy about it, Be very glad For a great revard awaits in heaven. And remember the ancient prophets were persecuted in the same way... OK ? That time U all persecuted Jesus now you persecuted Muhammad...
Well you prove that x did not exist at the same time you must prove its alternative that then who was x instead? Because you couldn't prove that y was existed instead, then the argument remained unsolved that who was muhammad then? If there is any doubt that muhammad was not a real name for the founder of islam it is easy to prove that Musailama the false prophet that is shown as sarcastically in the eyes of the world in the islamic history and hadith is the real prophet of islam. The strong reason for this is the shape and the roots of the related words to Musailamah, islam, muslim, salam, taslim.... The following is from wikipedia. "Musaylimah (Arabic: مُسَيْلِمَةُ) short for Musaylimah al-Kadhdhāb (Musaylimah the Arch-Liar) otherwise known as Maslamah ibn Ḥabīb (Arabic: مَسْلَمَةُ بْنُ حَبِيبٍ) d.632, was a preacher of monotheism[1][2][3] from the Banū Ḥanīfah tribe,[4][5] and one of a series of people (including his future wife Sajah) who claimed to be a prophet in 7th-century Arabia. He was a leader during the Wars of Apostasy. He is considered by current Muslims to be a false prophet (Arabic: اَلْكَذَّابُ al-Kadhāb).["
@asd sad you are using a source that allows 'editing' to it's content. I suggest doing a deeper means of source material to quote from like a published book that can not be edited on the fly.
Bible says the earth is flat Matthew 4:8, Luke 4:5 the devil took him Jesus to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. it's possible only if the world is flat but today we know the world is circle you can't see the opposite side of the earth from a mountain. Daniel 4:11 the tree grew up and its top reached the sky and it was visible to the ends of the earth and everyone can see the tree. that tree only possible to see if the earth is flat. You can't see tree from a circle earth !
@@Billy-Mandalay what I'm saying it's from the Bible! it's not my own word! God of the Bible is cursed the female child. Leviticus 12:1-5 God said to Moses a woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son she will be unclean for 7 days Then the woman must wait 33 days to be purified from her bleeding. If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait 66 days to be purified from her bleeding. the daughters and girls they are more filthy and dirty than men? the birth of female is a double pollution? Contradictions and errors in the Bible. Exodus 33:20 God said to Moses you cannot see my face, for no one can see me and live. John 1:18 No one has seen God at any time. Genesis 32:30 Jacob saw God face to face, and his life is preserved. Exodus 33:11 God spoke to Moses face to face Exodus 33:23 God showed His backside to Moses. one place God said no one can't see me but other place He says Jacob and Moses saw face to face to God. Genesis 3:14, Isaiah 65:25 God says the serpent eat dust, and the dust will be the food of serpent. today even a child knows that snake does not eat dust. not a single Zoology book says that serpent eat dust.
@@UmarAli-ff2fx anything to say that applies to the information presented in this video? Your using prepackaged Polemics that many (if not a vast majority) have see before. It is very very boring. Have you ever read one whole chapter of any verse you have referenced?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
@@gilbertjones9157 Bible is the book of Devil! shameful things in the Bible! Isaiah 20:2-3 God command to the prophet Isaiah to walk naked for 3 years. how God command such a shameful thing and how Isaiah walk in front of his mother, daughters, sisters and other people naked. Ezekiel 4:12 God is telling to his prophet to eat barley cakes and bake it with dung that coming out of man in their sight. Malachi 2:3 dung on your faces, shit on your faces. in the book of God, God is talking! Jeremiah 20:7 Bible says, God is deceiver. Can you imagine that, does God deceive somebody ? Revelation 13:1-2 the beast with 7 heads. have you seen such animal ? Leviticus 11:20-21 (KJV) among abomination the fowls with 4 legs is abomination for you. But in (NIV) and other modern Bibles says "all flying insects" not fowl. But you know such a fowl and such a insect does not exist in the world, it can be only Dragon 🤣😆🤣 All insects have got 6 legs not 4 !
Matthew 5:17-20 Jesus says Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Why you Christian people are not following the Bible? Why you are not doing the commandments of God ? Bible says eating pork is prohibited, forbidden! Leviticus 11:7-8, Deuteronomy 14:8 the flesh of pork is unclean, don't eat flesh of swine, it's unclean for you. We muslims we don't eat pork but you christians eating pork. Bible says Alcohol is forbidden! Ephesians 5:18, Proverbs 20:1 And be not drunk with wine. We muslims we don't drink alcohol but you christians drinking. Christians must be circumcised! Genesis 17:9-12 God said unto Abraham, every man child among you must be circumcised. Genesis 17:14 And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant. Leviticus 12:1-3 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean. And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. Luke 2:21 even Jesus was circumcised. We muslims are circumcised but you christians are not. Bible says that the woman must cover her head, like the muslim woman wearing hijab! 1 Corinthians 11:5-6 the woman must cover her head, but if she does not cover her head, she must shaved her head. Now tell me who is more christian and who is following Jesus ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
wine in the Bible is 100% alcohol. Genesis 19:30-36 read this verse, you will see wine in the Bible is 100% alcohol ! Genesis 9:21-23 When he drank some of its wine, he became drunk and lay naked inside his tent. Proverbs 31:6-7 God says give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts. Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more. this devilish advice given by God in the Bible!!! John 2:1-11 first miracle what Jesus is done He turned water into wine, therefore all Christian people is alcoholic and drunken !
@@_John_P that river of wine in Jannah! not in this world! Have you seen a river of wine in the world? That river of wine is not alchohol like wine in the Bible!
Jesus is not God! He is prophet of God, like other prophets. Jesus never said that he is God!!! John 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me. God can do everything, but Jesus said I can't do nothing. how he can be God ? Jesus doesn't have his own power ! Matthew 28:18 Jesus said All power is given unto me. given by who ? John 14:28 Jesus said my Father is greater than I. John 10:29 Jesus says My Father is greater than all. if Jesus was God, then He must say that He is greater not Father. Matthew 19:16-17 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. a man who does not accept to call him good, how He can say to you to call him God? this verse says Jesus is a man and he didn't do any miracle. Acts 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know: Luke 2:21 Jesus was circumcised. can you imagine that, God was circumcised? someone take the penis of God and he is circumcised God. this man Melchisedec is greater than Jesus. Hebrews 7:3 Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, He is without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life. you christians says that Jesus had father and mother and he had the beginning which he born from Mary and he had end which he died on the cross. but this man Melchisedec doesn't have father and mother and neither beginning of day not end of life. now tell me who is greater ? Mark 11:12 Jesus was hungry. can you imagine hangry God ? John 11:35 Jesus wept. can you imagine God is crying like a baby.😭😭😭 does it fit to God ? a man who need for something he will cry not God but God does not need for anything because He had all power to do. Jesus is came only for the jews not for the Americans not for the Europeans but only for the jews house of Israel. Matthew 15:24 Jesus says I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Jesus had 4 father ? Matthew 1:1 Jesus Christ is the son of David and the son of Abraham. Luke 3:23 Jesus is a son of Joseph. Mark 1:1 Jesus is the son of God. who is the father of Jesus ? is Jesus only the son of God? Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son. Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God. who is really the son of God ?
Their are so many different Bible in the world and their are not the same!!! King James Version has 66 books but in Catholic Version has 73 books Trinity is not in modern Bibles!!! 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. This verse you can find only in King James Version and Catholic Version but in all modern Bibles this verse was deleted from the Bible, New International Version, Revised Standard Version and all modern Bibles does not have this verse!!! Why they deleted this verse? Because your scholars says, Christian scholars says this verse is fabrication and fake, therefore the Christian scholars they thrown out this verse from all modern Bibles, All modern Bibles does not have this verse. You christians chanting the thing which is fake and fabrication!!! John 3:16 this verse says Jesus is only begotten Son of God. this verse "begotten" you can find only in King James Version and Catholic Version but in All modern Bibles does not have this word "begotten" New International Version, Revised Standard Version and all modern Bibles says that "only son of God" not "begotten" Why they thrown this word? Because your scholars says, Christian scholars says this word "begotten" is fabrication and fake. Therefore in all modern Bibles does not have this word. is Jesus only the son of God? Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son. Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God. who is really the son of God ?
Stay on the subject. This video is about Muhammad and this has nothing to do with Christianity. Defend your religion. It needs defending as it seems to be phony.
@Umar Ali I have told you previously that Polemics does not work here. We have seen all of this before and we are not moved. Your expenditure of effort has no effect. Let's see how many different recensions of the Qurans published in Arabic are there? Which one of Hafs seven recensions was the 1924 Cairo addition?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
.... يا نصراني انت تعبد أرباب كثيرة متعددة منفصلة مختلفة متفرقة وغير متحدة فما السبب.. NASRANY You worship 3 different Gods not one God not equal not United.. Separated.. Why you worship them.. Enough one God not 3...
He was God in three persons, however they are all God. Also, why does the Quran claim Yeshua to be a prophet when He taught nothing that is advocated by Islam. If Yeshua was not the Son of God, then He was certainly not a prophet of Islam. When did He command his disciples to kill anyone for rejecting the Gospel? When did He say anything about going to Mecca ( which did not even exist during His time) and praying to a Kaaba?
@ب برىء You need to take a course in comparative religion to have an understanding of the theology of Christianity. It is correct that the word Trinity is not found in scripture. Even Hinduism has the idea of God Head but they defiantly believe these are separate deities. Christianity only builds on the Jewish concepts of complexity of God's interaction with Humanity; Creator, Word and Breath. We all know that Judaism is monotheistic but they have at a minimum a Dualistic concept of God. My understanding of this was a reaction to the development of Christianity and not a continuation of their understanding prior to the 1st century CE. This was a reaction to what Jesus pointed out from their own scriptural commentaries.
@@aaaabraham837 Educate yourself. Stop using prepackaged Polemics. You are cherry picking out of context and it is a total Fail. This verse is part of a parable, dolt. Read the whole chapter Luke 19. If you respond to this reply I will fry you up like sausage with peppers, mushrooms and spice it will be tasty but for you an antacid will be necessary. PS. Jesus may have said this but it was not His enemies but the enemies of the King of the parable known as the Parable of Talents.
I would like to thank all of you subscribers for cracking the 50,000 subscribers total! In fact it reached that milestone 2 hours before uploading this video! We also went over 8 million views this week as well, so we must be doing something right!
Peace and Blessing of Yeshua be with you Jay Brother ♥️
Couldn't "the Christ to come" be in reference to Jesus coming back on Islam's Day of Judgment to judge everyone?
@@Islamisthecultofsin
But its entirely a different perspective in Islamic Cult
Jesus will come and kill pigs and
Break cross
Abolish jizya
Entirely
Muhammad says lord Jesus converted himself to a Muslim
What a joke
@@RoarT19 I know it's different but it is still Jesus returning.
@@Islamisthecultofsin
Yes.
But for Islamic Haddith
Its entirely different
Jesus will kill the jews and Christians and
He will have wife and die
And rise alive
Stupid doctrine
People do Prefer TRUTHS , PROOFS & FACTS . And you Have it All Dr.Jay and AL-FADI ! Thank you Guys! Great work! That is why many subscribers now! Congrats!
Thanks Dr. Jay for these nuggets. Number 14 in the series. More grace Sir to you, Al Fadi, Murad, Hatun, the Pfander family and other brothers and sisters in Christ engaged in apologetics
WOW you put the words together nicely that I can only say thank you and a big like for you.
Are you Christian?
I became muslim thanks to Jay and Fadi. I used their methodology for Paul.
@@oneone3763 I feel sorry for you
@@oneone3763 This is not an intellectual debate. It is about the Truth and its absoluteness. It is not about winning debates. What exactly is in Islam that you willing to pledge your eternity for? I pray for you to see your sinful nature and come to the saving grace of Jesus. As for Mohammed, who has led so many people astray, his reward is waiting for him
@@oneone3763 Did they ever talked about Paul??? If yes would love to see the video please.
I'm convinced, Prophet Muhammad according to the books created during the times of Abbasid (Sirah and Hadith) is a mythical-legend figure, created by the Abbasid Chaliphate.
I'm convinced that Jesus was Malay...ha ha ha
@@aaaabraham837 That is an inane statement made out of frustrated spite.
@@boobsruntube6541
NO - That instatement is made in response to the other INSANE STATEMENT that Mohammad (saw) is a mythical-legend figure...
@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated
The Science of Hadiths
is over 1200 yrs old and been proved over and over, OVER the centuries...the Isnad - chain of narrators to the source have been thoroughly studied by scholars and hundreds of 1000's of hadiths have been scrutinized and graded to be classified...
ANY HADITH, any, even Sahih hadiths that have a good Isnad MUST BE ACCORDING TO THE QURAN in order to be accepted.
@EveryIsnaad IsFabricated
The people of Mohammad (saw) time and the 4 generations thereafter,
the rightly guided, meaning:
* the 10 000 companions/disciples of Mohammad (saw), the Sahabas,
* the Tabie-een, scholars who were taught by the Sahabas
* and the Tabie'een - Tabie'een - those who were taught by the Tabie'een...
were ALL Quran only...as they could relate to the life and example of Mohammad (saw) and his practices...but when they died out and Islam started to expand to Non-Arabian lands -that gap of 250 yrs, Muslims like Bukhari, Muslim, Abu-Dawood and many other, made it their life duty to collect EVERYTHING they could find on Mohammad (saw)...
These collections of Statements, Testimonies, Reports (meaning of the word hadith) were made by all kinds of people, from Muslims, Jews, Xtians and even from enemies of Islam were classified, numbered and graded by scholars using the Isnad method.
THIS METHOD
is the best to get to the truth and sources, as each of the narrators in that chain is investigated if they were truthful in everything or otherwise....also different reports (hadiths) on the same topic are compared...it takes a Muslim scholar today 3-4 yrs at University to learn the Science of Hadiths.
YES - tons of hadiths are fabricated and some are listed as "Mawḍū' also included in Hadith books and studied - as other information therein is correct but the 'crux' or the vital part is made-up and not true.
IN REALITY
this amounts to 0,01% of all hadiths as the other 99.99% is accepted by Muslims as it is according to Quranic teaching and Elaborate and compliment the Quran.
And this series should be on national tv across the globe..great work CIRA 🙏👏🏼
Thanks Jay nd Alfadi for the information God Bless U, Come on Home Brothers and sisters.
Thanks Brother Al Fadi and Dr Jay.Watching your livestreams keeps me on the edge of my chair and I know bombshells of vital information will be dropped.The extent of desperation by the adherents is beyond imagination.Keep up the good work.
STOP believing these liars and Deceivers..are you that gullible?
@@aaaabraham837 Pfander films had 8 million views, and yes if you have the facts why don't you debunk them .The tag line they are telling lies is old and stale Ya Akhi.Come up with something novel and groundbreaking.Bless your heart.
@@julietabraham476
They WERE DEBUNKED many times over and over...WITH PROOF, yet they REPEAT these allegations for NEW GULLIBLE XTIANS ...like you?
@@aaaabraham837 Show me evidence.Anybody can say anything.I am a researcher myself but not in religion, and yes I would appreciate if you could show respect and not call me gullible.Is that what your faith teaches you??? Dear brother in humanity.
@@julietabraham476 Seconded!
great report by 2 legends
Never put a man before the Truth!
Nuff Said!
Pray the true God finds any Muslim watching this video but struggling with family because of generational tradition of faith and culture hindering you from the THE TRUTH
To the honorable Muslim reading this, do you confess today to the Creator of the Universe that..
1. Adam was made from Clay?
2. That life was breathed into him by the Word-"Be"?
3. Do you confess that Qabil tried to atone for his works with his Labour/his own Works from the field; that was insufficient?
4. Do you confess to The Creator that Habil used an innocent, spotless lamb that God provided to atone for his sin?
5. Is this Qurbani/Udhiyah?
6. Do you admit that all those that got into Nuhs Ark were saved?
7. That those who thought a global flood would be impossible, were not saved?
8. Do you accept that God asked Ibrahim to bind his son?
9. Is that proof that Ibrahim loved his God?
10. Is Isa the "Kalimatullah" as mentioned in Qur'an 3:45 and 4:171? (Translation "Word of God")
When you speak, your words are you, they hold all the authority of your body and mind but are completely different medium. The Word of God became flesh in to Jesus Christ, who died on the Cross as the Lamb of God, the Qurbani/Udhiyah/Sacrifice for all mankind.
I know what you are going to say, "God can not be a man". But you admit that God can enter creation, as he did when he spoke to Musa as a burning bush. If God can be talking fire, he can become a talking piece of clay. *Checkmate*
I have done exactly as Qur'an 5:47 instructs me. I judged Islam to be false.
@@silverltc2729 Jesus is one of the greatest prophets that God created.
God has created and gave life to many spiritual teachers and prophets from, Adam , Buddha, Confucius, Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad and so on.
Many of their words have been altered by the Romans. Greeks, political groups, and others to suit their ambitions.
Praise God for giving you both the great knowledge to find out what the truth is of their prophet Muhammad
God bless brothers 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I was just wondering, with that many wives, where were the children?
Interesting point, he had many wives whom he got one daughter if my memory is correct and no son in spite of the tradition telling us he was able to have sex many times each day of his life as a prophet. I remember one Saudi Arabia king got 80 kids from his wives.
@@didierfavre2356 ah, a daughter. What happened to her?
@@alvinhugh I forgot.
I might even be wrong and he had no children. I do not wish to search for it but I migth be mistaking her with his young young young wife Aicha.
@@didierfavre2356 but ye, you would expect him to have more kids. Very odd.
Congratulations Jay
50k subscribers ♥️♥️
after all those years of lying, he just got 50k if was showing how to fry an egg he must had more subscribers, i feel sorry for Christianity
Another prophet in the area and era with a sword and one who claimed he held the keys to heaven was Musaylimah Al-Kaddhab.
Great Info!
AMEN HALLELUJAH GLORY TO GOD GREAT IS YOUR FAITHFULNESS TO ME IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS CHRIST 🙏🙏🙏🙏Each and every day, I do my best to share these awesome and powerful messages without fear and shame to the lost
Don't forget to add #1-12 to this playlist. Only #13 & #14 are on it now. Thanks! Praying for you and this ministry.
On these polemical views: what do the academics say?
Your mention of brigands raise a thought.
There are aspects of the Koran that would be very useful for a tribe of brigands to believe.
A tribe of brigands would need every fighter it could get. All the offers of slave girls and come to think of it 72 virgins on death would be very useful in getting uneducated teenage boys to fight. All the hatred of other religions would further incite them to fight. But they'd take a lot of casualties, fighting all the time. So they'd need the women to produce as many replacements as possible. hence girls would be married at puberty, or to be on the safe side a bit before. but who to? with the young men away fighting and so many dead there wouldn't be enough men to go round. Answer- the women have to share husbands. This can be spun to the teenagers as them getting four wives- which they will if they survive the fighting, and after having spent half their "adult" life as single warriors.
If he is not Muhammad the prophet of Islam than a question should be asked as to who that Saracen prophet actually is, as he is described in the Doctrina Iacobi.
Those times were just like in India nowadays where you find spiritual leaders everywhere.
@Yuser PAH what proof do you present that this was the messenger from this document?
God bless Dr. Jay and Al Fadi. May God’s blessing keep you both safe. We need your teachings.
As they can't find anything about allah or mohamed in the Bible, they just have to look somewhere else.
The very definition of "an endless search"...
Paul didn't exist.
@@oneone3763 There were quite a few letters by Paul, and also some elements of biography in Acts of the Apostles, so there was evidence back in the 1C that could be contested, if it were a fiction. The letters have common characteristics, so the same personality is there to see. Also he teaches certain supernatural aspects of the gospel, that have been witnessed, so he was bringing church revelations out.
Whereas "Mohammed" of the Quran is not authenticated - no location, background that people would have been able to check up on, in the 7C. This Doctrina Jacobi that many muslims would like to be about Mohammed, does not fit, such as this self-proclaimed prophet speaking Aramaic and being in the wrong place and not having the same message. Jay is also saying this figure was a bit of a brute, so would you want to accept that as being the warner-messenger of the Quran? As in any theoretical "last prophet" would surely be living by high standards.
@@collybever
The book of acts is written by an ananymous author. He tried to make a connection between the letters and gospels and made a figure up based on Josephus.
Both Paul and Josephus were Roman citizens.
Both Paul and Josephus were Pharisees
Both spent time as Roman prisoners.
Paul was originally named Saul.
Titus Flavius Josephus was formally Joseph ben Matityahu.
Paul was a former persecutor of Christians.
Josephus had been an enemy of Rome.
Paul said that circumcision was not required for Gentile Christians.
Josephus maintained that non-Jews did not require circumcision in order to stay among Jews.
Paul was 'caught away to the third heaven'
Josephus had prophetic dreams.
Paul made a defense of Christianity before Agrippa II.
Josephus appealed to Agrippa II to attest the truth of what he had written in his history of the Roman/Jewish wars.
Both had a friend named Epaphroditus.
@@oneone3763 not relevant lol
5.30 did I just hear that right ?
Yea go on Dr Jay 9.52!
There's something I don't understand. Muslims have every right to defend their beliefs on channels like this one, especially if they do it with integrity.
What genuinely confuses me is when certain ones completely ignore the actual content of the video and instead begin spamming the comments section with completely unrelated information.
Not only does this diminish the credibility of other Muslims by making them look like trolls that lack any legitimate defense of the religion, but it literally inflates engagement with the video, causing the algorithm to spread and promote it even more.
Maybe they don't realize they're actually helping to boost the popularity of channels and content they don't agree with, but it's always baffled me.
It's the TH-cam equivalent of free advertising.
@Todd Beamer Hmm. That's really interesting. I don't think I've heard any Muslims making that claim, but I guess it's possible. Christianity has different sects with various rules and expectations and I often wonder if the same applies to the followers of Islam.
I was thinking that maybe it's cathartic for some of them to be sort of a nuisance to channels like this, or at the very least to cast a shadow of doubt on certain Christian beliefs, but I can't be sure. It just seems incredibly counterproductive. Especially when you factor in monetization, which gives that type of spamming the added benefit of putting money into the pockets of their detractors.
This video doesn't deserve an intellectual response.
Two clowns behind their laptop use in every video different criteria.
Their criteria is that they set criteria that will always lead to a rejection.
Once they will make an objective video of their methodology and criteria we will respond.
@Todd Beamer The more I think on it, your comment makes a lot of sense and fills in a few blanks for me. I've had a lot of Muslims reply to comments I've made on videos like this, but I can hardly think of a single one who addressed their grievances with whatever I said in "an intellectual" manner. They usually just insult or call me a liar and then hurl totally unrelated accusations about Christianity my way and attempt to goad me into defending those instead. Fascinating.
It's still not helping the cause of Islam, though. Because in addition to boosting the spread of these videos, the fact that they don't provide a viable argument for what's said here will only ensure that any Muslims harboring doubts about the religion will find zero rebuttals to the tough questions, thereby causing them to have even greater doubts and bringing them one step closer to leaving the faith.
@Todd Beamer
There is nothing to learn in these video's. They are low level propaganda video's.
Only people with desires like you come to these channels to 'learn'.
Muslims use their intellect. That's why we don't believe in the trinity.
You don't use your intellect that's why you believe in the trinity.
@Todd Beamer Yes, I'm well aware of the jihad part. That adds up completely. What doesn't is basically what my original comment is about. In their attempt to prevent criticism of Islam from being disseminated, they're achieving the very opposite here, because the algorithm doesn't differentiate between positive or negative engagement. All engagement is good engagement on TH-cam.
Oh well. They have every right to do it either way, but thanks for explaining that for me. 🙏🏻
👍
If the origins of Islam are much further north (as many of your videos suggest), surely the Aramaic question disappears?
🙏👍👌✝️💐
I have worked my way through this series and I have found it to be very interesting. I am not religious - I was not born with that gene - so I do not place any single religion on a pedestal; all are subject to profound criticism from my point of view - though I would like to stress that I try not to be dismissive of people who have faith in a higher power simply because they are people of faith and are therefore in some way intellectually inferior. To me, seeking solace and a sense of belonging seems to be a very human thing to do. It’s what usually comes after that leaves me cold.
So I’ve worked my way through these talks and everything I have heard seems to correlate and expand upon points I first encountered when reading Tom Holland’s “In the Shadow of the Sword”. The complete absence of external, independent historical evidence for the existence of Mohammad seems incredible. Particularly when considering that this was taking place in a far more recent period of history when compared to the Old or New Testaments. I understand that different regions progress at different rates, and have different traditions regarding the dissemination of information; but this utter absence of external corroborating evidence is truly unusual. As is the traditional narrative of an origin for which there is no archaeological support, but there are multiple far more likely explanations. It really does set Islam apart.
That is not to say that the Old and New Testaments are without fault. It is very hard to find any hard historical facts to support anything in the Old Testament preceding the enslavement of the Jews in Babylon. And the historicity of the New Testament’s version of events almost entirely begins and ends with the execution of Jesus. But Islam’s rejection of rational explanations for which there are credible ancient and modern explanations in favour of less likely and intellectually inconsistent arguments seems to be deeply problematic. When coupled with an iteration of god for whom there is no absolute right or wrong, only the (interpreted) will of god; and a strong tendency to look backwards when challenged, this becomes legitimately concerning. Particularly when followers may be looking back on a past that did not exist. What sort of guidance will that provide?
Though I cannot help but think that not matter how reasonably these challenges are articulated, nothing will change when the challenges to orthodoxy come from outsiders. The questions will have to come from within Islam for anything to change. Hopefully for the better of all.
Frangment of the Arab conquest ???
References to Muhammad claiming to hold the keys to paradise can actually be found in Islamic traditions. There is a piece written by Sean W Anthony called "Muḥammad, the Keys to Paradise, and the Doctrina Iacobi: A Late Antique Puzzle".
One such tradition goes like this, I copy from Sean W Anthony here, Muhammad says: "I will be the first to exit the grave when they are resurrected; I will be their leader once they arrive; I will address them as they hearken; I will be their mediator when they are imprisoned; and I will bring good-tidings when they are struck dumb with fear. On that day the banner of nobility, the keys to paradise, and the banner of praise shall be in my hands."
Clearly and strangly resembles a particular biblical verse
...I will ascend to the mountain of the most high...I will .... yours truly..Satan
@@Arsalan5431 is that Isaiah 14:13? “You said in your heart, “I will ascend to the heavens; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly, on the utmost heights of Mount Zaphon.”
@@Arsalan5431 oh I get it, one must also include the preceding verse “How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!”
@@patatje6974 yes thats correct
@@patatje6974 the son of the morning star...can be translated to oh Hilel ibn sahar....crescent moon
That is what I refer to what is this guy name that said that?
Prophets Daniyal, Irmiya, Yahya, Zakariya, Al-Yasa, Iliyas, Ya'qub, Isha'ya, and Syam. All prove that the name of God is Yahweh/YHWH.
Hm. Who ever said that islam would have ended unless for the sword, who this guy?
Look I love your work, but I respectfully disagree. Muhammad was real; he was a prophet; he was the object of this letter, but I think his religion was very different than Islam. I think later Muslims simply built Islam on the foundations of the real Muhammad, who was a heretical Christian (promoting a different Christos to come). Just as the Quran is a later compilation, the traditional Muhammad (the one we know today) was compiled over time until they had invented the "tradition."
It's as if someone built a religion around David Koresh decades later. There was a real Koresh, but they'd invent a new one to better fit their needs. That's what they did here.
In Christianity, the earliest texts support the basics of Christianity.
Here, the earliest texts prove it was a completely different religion that only later became Islam.
It is the standard narrative about him that is being questioned here.
@@Billy-Mandalay Sorry I was unclear: I agree w/ their general critique of the standard narrative; I disagree w/ their claims on this particular document. I think the real Muhammad was a heretical Christian brigand who probably conquered/dominated a significant portion of the Arab world; later, Muslims built upon him - and other myths w/ new ones thrown in - to create the standard narrative. So, I think the standard narrative is false, but I think it has more factual basis than they do.
He was a self-proclaimed "prophet"; he was a monotheist; he did conquer various things (what & when & how may be unclear), but the prophet of Islam didn't exist - it's more of a "based on a true story" kind of thing.
Unlike Christianity, Islam begins w/ one story & gets another decades later. Christian, of course, can trace their basic beliefs back to Christ's resurrection, and there's literally no contrary evidence (no evidence we ever told a different story).
But there were Jewish tribes in Medina. SIN says Mohamed made a pact with them and later destroyed them after a battle, of the trench I think, from memory, And of course being a merchant travelling on his camels he traveled north to Aramaic speaking country and would have learned Aramaic,the lingua Franca if the region for thousands of years. Plus did he not have a Christian monk as a close elder sort of mentor ? He too would have spoken Aramaic, no ? So other arguments seem fine but not the Aramaic one, your thoughts ??? Ps: Aramaic back then should be seen as english today, everyone who learns or travels learns some just to communicate and get by.
Who stopped the the ending of the islam religion?
Uh but Muslims do believe Jesus is coming again?
whats the music at the end the only thing is that it mentions the saracens so it is possible they got some islamic teachings wrong
@Baji Scipio Darayav Aurelius Julian Venizelos Nalwa You have missed that this series has kept consistent is that Islam post dates 650 CE. No one has found reference to anything Islamic pre 650 CE. That means Islamic teachings were not in existence when this was written.
The claims so far are very audacious. Let's have the end game in your opinion. Give us a time-line of history since 600. What happened on the military, religious and cultural levels?
who's this christian cleric Sebas of 670 ad?
@mysotiras 8 thanks
The Doctrina Iacobi refers to a Jew among the saracens, not to a saracen.
There is no Talmud before the 9th century in it's current form. What do you mean by Jew?
Moses didn't exist according to your 'methodology'.
@@oneone3763 هُودًا
@@Bei-Abedan
We can't assume things right.
We have to go by scripture evidence in your methodology.
There are no manuscripts of the Talmud before the 9th century.
There is no Tanakh before 200 bc.
We have to reject all biblical prophets.
The oral tradition of islam is million times superior to the oral tradition of judaism.
@@oneone3763 As I always try to remind everyone, I don't have a methodology except Judaism. I am an enemy to the Abbasids and do not trust anything which passed through the hands of anyone who acknowledged the Abbasid Caliphs.
This is not a methodology, this is a opposition.
But you elevate Abbasid sources while I elevate Jewish sources. Although I do not understand why you don't believe in the prophets.
Is there any common ground between us? If not then there is no conversation possible between us.
You are correct that a book called the TaNaKh did not exist before 2ndC.AD but my sect is a branch of the Romaniote Jews who use the Septuagint.
@@Bei-Abedan
I don't elevate Abbasids sources. I elevate muslim reliable sources which are million times more reliable than the talmud and the Septaguint.
There is no common ground between me and you.
If this was Muhammed Muslims would have to accept he held to the second coming and that Jesus was His Lord!
but your god is dead and if god was dead who gonna resurrect him for the second coming?
@@mardukh5136 Resurrected seated with the Father Lord over Muhammed
@@davidchase1439 i have no problem with that, my problem if Jesus is sitting on the right hand of his father and if Jesus is God that makes two gods sitting beside each other not one god , my question to you where the holy spirit will be sitting ?
@@mardukh5136 no both are God yet One God
@@davidchase1439. listen to what you saying both are Gods when you use the word both you mean 2 thank you just prove my point. but my question was what happened to your holy spirit where he will be sitting according to your fabricated doctrine they should be all the time together, is he on vacation on the most important day which is the day of judgement?
now give me one verse in your entire corrupted book that the three are one meaning god the father god the son and god the holy spirit are not three gods but one, if not give me one verse where Jesus said I am god or worship me?
do you know the difference between polytheism and monotheism?
Jay Smith Embarrassing mistakes on the bogus history of Dome of the rock
1). First big Mistakes forgetting the Crusader
Abdul Malik bin Marwan was the fifth caliph of the Umayyads dynasty. Jay Smit praised him as “the great Arab reformer", because Abdul Malik created Muhammad and Islam out of nothing, totally from thin air .... Hahaha.
He created Muhammad by ordering people to write the name Muhammad on the dome of the rock. Once Muhammad was created by Abdul Malik, then suddenly Quran miraculously come into existence complete 114 chapters...hahaha.
Abdul Malik then ordered people to write some inscription from Quranic verses he just created on various wals of some of the rock. On the south wall, people wrote these verses
In the name of God, the Merciful the Compassionate. There is no god but God. He is One. He has no associate. Unto Him belongeth sovereignity and unto Him belongeth praise. He quickeneth and He giveth death; and He has Power over all things. Muhammad is the servant of God and His Messenger.
Note : You can check all inscriptions on dome on the rock on Islamic awareness website.
The problem is
When creating his bogus Islamic history, Jay Smith Ph.D.seems to forget that, when the Crusaders conquered Jerusalem in 1099, after bloody massacre of jew and Muslims. The crusader then gave the Dome of the Rock to the Augustinians, who turned it into a church named The Templum Domini.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templum_Domini
This Church became an important symbol of Jerusalem, depicted on coins minted under the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem.
Jay Smith PhD then create a bogus story that Abdul Malik has ordered people to write down some inscriptions on the wall of dome of the rock ambulatory. That inscription includes an explicit rejection of the divinity of Christ,
People of the Book, do not go to excess in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary, a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’- stop, that is better for you- God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust.
Do you think is it possible the writings against Christianity were left untouched by the crusaders for hundreds of years inside the church Templum Domini, and survive to the preset day?. That's impossible....hahaha. Please read the story of crusader conquest of Jerusalem
I don't believe Arab Christians at that time didn't understand the verses that contradicted the divinity of Jesus. Judging from the story of Jewish and Muslim massacre during Jerusalem conquest, it is impossible the writings against Christianity were left untouched inside the church Templum Domini located at the center in area ruled by crusaders.
After nearly a hundred years under Crusader rule, on October 2, 1187, Muslim army under Saladin, reconquered Jerusalem. Saladin turned the dome of the rock into a Muslim shrine.
Many of the Mameluke, Abbasid and Ottoman sultans who ruled after Saladin, made many changes to the dome of the rock.
Therefore, The Dome of the Rock was built by the Umayyad caliph Abdul al-Malik but the famous inscription on the dome ambulatory was made by Abbasid caliph Al-Ma'mun (r. 813-833) during whose reign renovations took place. Al-Mamun name is written along with the inscriptions of famous Qur'anic verses, all written in the Kufic script.
The biggest change was made by the 16th-century Ottoman sultan Suleyman the Magnificent, who decorated it with Quranic Inscriptions in Tuluth Arabic Script and Turkish faience tiles.
2). St John of Damascus called Muslims “Saracens” and Mohammed a “false prophet”
The biggest earliest critique of Islam is John of Damascus or St. John of Damascus, (Eastern and Western feast day December 4). He was born c. 675, Damascus and died December 4, 749, near Jerusalem. He life during Abdul Malik reign and quite close from the time of prophet death in 632 AD.
Jhon of Damascus is a Christian saint who well known as the first Christian polemicist. How it is possible this Christian Saint criticized Islam if Mohammad doesn’t exist.
In his book The Fountain of Wisdom, in the second part he wrote Concerning Heresy (Perì eréseon) - the last chapter of this part (Chapter 101) deals with the Heresy of the Ishmaelite. He explicitly wrote About Muhammad and Islam, like this
a) Agarenes, Ishmaelites and Saracens,
There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, [who] was born to Abraham of Agar, and for this reason they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites. They are also called Saracens, which is derived from Sarras kenoi, or destitute of Sara, because of what Agar said to the angel: ‘Sara hath sent me away destitute.’ [99]
b) called Muhammad was a False Prophet who
Life During The Time of Heraclius
These used to be idolaters and worshiped the morning star and Aphrodite, whom in their own language they called Khabár, which means great. [100] And so down to the time of Heraclius they were very great idolaters. From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, [101] devised his own heresy.
c) He tell very famous story about Muhammad propagated by Christian polemicist
As has been related, this Mohammed wrote many ridiculous books, to each one of which he set a title. For example, there is the book On Woman, [109] in which he plainly makes legal provision for taking four wives and, if it be possible, a thousand concubines-as many as one can maintain, besides the four wives. He also made it legal to put away whichever wife one might wish, and, should one so wish, to take to oneself another in the same way.
Mohammed had a friend named Zeid. This man had a beautiful wife with whom Mohammed fell in love. Once, when they were sitting together, Mohammed said: ‘Oh, by the way, God has commanded me to take your wife.’ The other answered: ‘You are an apostle. Do as God has told you and take my wife.’ Rather-to tell the story over from the beginning-he said to him: ‘God has given me the command that you put away your wife.’ And he put her away. Then several days later: ‘Now,’ he said, ‘God has commanded me to take her.’ Then, after he had taken her and committed adultery with her, he made this law: ‘Let him who will put away his wife. And if, after having put her away, he should return to her, let another marry her. For it is not lawful to take her unless she have been married by another. Furthermore, if a brother puts away his wife, let his brother marry her, should he so wish.’ [110] In the same book he gives such precepts as this: ‘Work the land which God hath given thee and beautify it. And do this, and do it in such a manner” [111]-not to repeat all the obscene things that he did.
Sorthodoxinfo.com/general/stjohn_islam.aspx
On Catholics Ensyclopedia you can find a short paragraph on Jhon of Damascus about Islam and Muhammad.
The second part, "Concerning Heresy", is little more than a copy of a similar work by Epiphanius, brought up to date by John Damascene. The author indeed expressly disclaims originality except in the chapters devoted to Islamism, Iconoclasm, and Aposchitae. To the list of eighty heresies that constitute the "Panarion" of Epiphanius, he added twenty heresies that had sprung up since his time. In treating of Islamism he vigorously assails the immoral practices of Mohammed and the corrupt teachings inserted in the Koran to legalize the delinquencies of the prophet
www.newadvent.org/cathen/08459b.htm
Conclusion
So, St John of Damascus called Muslims “Saracens”, “Ishmaelites” and “Agarenes”, except that the “Saracens” designation might have been used earlier. All those names were pejorative. he also called Muhammad by name five times and he also called Mohammed a false prophet. He vigorously assails the immoral practices of Mohammed and the corrupt teachings inserted in the Koran to legalize the delinquencies of the prophet
How could a Christian Saint, who live a few decades after prophet death, vigorously assails Islam and Muhammad, but Muhammad didn’t exist.... ha ha ha.
3). Third fatal mistakes listen to this expert
Watch this videos showing Jay Smith panel of dubious expert when working
th-cam.com/video/B29OqXQqEds/w-d-xo.html
So it is murrad who proposed Muhammad is Yesus... Hahaha.
I have advice them, You guys had better check the healthiness of your mind to the nearest dentist or veterinarian .... Hahaha
Jay Smith PhD listens to the opinions of this strange dubious expert. That’s why so many mad videos he produced ... hehehe.
Jays put a big lie that Muhammad is Jesus and therefore, St. Jhon of Damascus attack this Muhammad who are Jesus himself
A Christian Saint attack Jesus ... how stupid
So Jay Smith big lies has been perfectly debunked ... hahaha.
I think you are going too fast. The location is not relevant. The description is seen through the eyes of a christian who thinks in terms of the second coming. He can quite easily be projecting his own beliefs onto the reports he has heard which are obviously sketchy. Maybe reports of Mohammeds death had not reached him either. Yes it is plausible that the Arabs were led by an arab christian monotheist. There seems to have been some kind of revelation that was subsequently polluted abd overlaid with vicious trash manufactured as occasion demanded. I think you have not allowed for the jacobi text being filtered through christian eyes. And as for "everyone" being a prophet - that wont do. Who were "mohammed's" rivals - if he had any. You cant just say "everyone"
It could be a reference to Ilyas ibn Qabisa.
Test for identify a true christian believer
Gospel of Mark 16:17-18 Jesus said, the believers in my name they can cast out devils, and they can speak with new tongues, and they can pick up snakes with their hands and if they drink any deadly poison it will not hurt them at all and if they will place their hands on sick people they will get well.
can you imagine, it's possible? is that any christian believer who can do this ?
even in Hollywood films they can't produce such a man who can do this things.
Umar, you are shooting blanks if all you do is cut paste everytime you come here.
@@Billy-Mandalay
Muhammad also shot blanks with regard to his sex life...
@Umar Ali Why are you using that which Christian scholars have pointed out was an addition to the text and is marked by a foot note stating that these verses are NOT found in early Greek manuscripts? If you wish to deal with the information from scripture try Matthew 28.
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
You wrote wrong history......traditions....According to doctrina jacobi he was a brutal
Contradictions and errors in the Bible
Ezra 2:65 they were 200 singing men and singing women.
Nehemiah 7:67 they were 245 singing men and singing women.
context is the same but numbers are different.
2 Kings 24:8 Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem 3 months.
2 Chronicles 36:9 Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he began to reign, and he reigned 3 months and 10 days in Jerusalem.
this two verse is the same but numbers are different.
1 Kings 7:26 he had 2000 baths.
2 Chronicles 4:5 he had 3000 baths.
in Solomon's temple how many baths he had ?
Leviticus 11:1-6 God said to Moses and Aaron the camel, hyrax, rabbit is chews the cud therefore it is unclean for you.
can you imagine that does camel, hyrax, rabbit chews the cud ?
is that a market for animals to sell cud?
Hi bro, are you the new kilapah?
Come on, don't be shy to acknowledge that there's no proof (scripts or artefacts) about abdul's book from the 7tn century 😴
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
1 Chronicles 16:30 Bible says the world does not move.
it's scientific errors in the Bible!
Hebrews 1:10-11, Psalms 102:25-26 this verse says the heavens and the earth they will perish
Ecclesiastes 1:4, Psalms 78:69 this verse says the earth remains forever.
earth will perish or remain forever ?
Job 26:11 The pillars of the heavens quake.
heavens have got pillars ?
Job 9:6, Psalms 75:3 this verse says the earth have got pillars.
it's scientific error !!!
Genesis 1:29 God says all plants they are food for you!
Today science proved that they are many poisonous plants if you eat you will die.
how God of the Bible doesn't know that ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Bible says the Sun is walking! Bible clearly says that the Sun is going down and clearly says the Sun is moving!
Ecclesiastes 1:5
The Sun also ariseth, and the Sun goeth down, and hasteth to his place where he arose.
Job 9:7
Which commandeth the Sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.
Deuteronomy 24:15
At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the Sun go down upon it.
Judges 9:33
And it shall be, that in the morning, as soon as the Sun is up, thou shalt rise early, and set upon the city.
@Umar Ali all passages you have sighted do NOT use the word walking.
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
@@gilbertjones9157 what does mean "Sun goeth down" ?
If you don't know go ask English man what does it means!
@@UmarAli-ff2fx Being both Irish and British and understanding KJV use of English, Sundown. There is no other use of the words - IN ENGLISH.
@@gilbertjones9157 "sundown, sun goeth down, sun go down upon" All of this has a same meaning sun is going!
Matthew 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
Luke 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
Look carefully to this two verse, Mathew says Joseph father was Jacob but Luke says Joseph father was Heli.
Who is the father of Joseph? or Joseph had two father?
In Jewish literature, grandfather is not used. A father in the line could be grandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfather, etc. Just as Abraham was the father of the people of Israel.
@@forthwithtx5852
Jesus had 4 father ?
Matthew 1:1 Jesus Christ is the son of David and the son of Abraham.
Luke 3:23 Jesus is a son of Joseph.
Mark 1:1 Jesus is the son of God.
who is the father of Jesus ?
is Jesus only the son of God?
Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons
Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son
Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son.
Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God.
who is really the son of God ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
Muhammad is He who is in mathew Mathew 5 : 11 God blesses you when people moke you, persecute you and lie about you and say all sorts of evil things against you because you are my followers .Be happy about it, Be very glad For a great revard awaits in heaven. And remember the ancient prophets were persecuted in the same way... OK ? That time U all persecuted Jesus now you persecuted Muhammad...
Anitha Raj...Full of shit
Well you prove that x did not exist at the same time you must prove its alternative that then who was x instead? Because you couldn't prove that y was existed instead, then the argument remained unsolved that who was muhammad then?
If there is any doubt that muhammad was not a real name for the founder of islam it is easy to prove that Musailama the false prophet that is shown as sarcastically in the eyes of the world in the islamic history and hadith is the real prophet of islam.
The strong reason for this is the shape and the roots of the related words to Musailamah, islam, muslim, salam, taslim....
The following is from wikipedia.
"Musaylimah (Arabic: مُسَيْلِمَةُ) short for Musaylimah al-Kadhdhāb (Musaylimah the Arch-Liar) otherwise known as Maslamah ibn Ḥabīb (Arabic: مَسْلَمَةُ بْنُ حَبِيبٍ) d.632, was a preacher of monotheism[1][2][3] from the Banū Ḥanīfah tribe,[4][5] and one of a series of people (including his future wife Sajah) who claimed to be a prophet in 7th-century Arabia. He was a leader during the Wars of Apostasy. He is considered by current Muslims to be a false prophet (Arabic: اَلْكَذَّابُ al-Kadhāb).["
You are contradicting your own 'methodology'.
Where did you read about Musailama?
@asd sad you are using a source that allows 'editing' to it's content. I suggest doing a deeper means of source material to quote from like a published book that can not be edited on the fly.
Bible says the earth is flat
Matthew 4:8, Luke 4:5 the devil took him Jesus to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.
it's possible only if the world is flat but today we know the world is circle you can't see the opposite side of the earth from a mountain.
Daniel 4:11 the tree grew up and its top reached the sky and it was visible to the ends of the earth and everyone can see the tree.
that tree only possible to see if the earth is flat. You can't see tree from a circle earth !
You upvote your own cut paste , don't you. 😄
@@Billy-Mandalay what I'm saying it's from the Bible! it's not my own word!
God of the Bible is cursed the female child.
Leviticus 12:1-5 God said to Moses a woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son she will be unclean for 7 days
Then the woman must wait 33 days to be purified from her bleeding.
If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait 66 days to be purified from her bleeding.
the daughters and girls they are more filthy and dirty than men?
the birth of female is a double pollution?
Contradictions and errors in the Bible.
Exodus 33:20 God said to Moses you cannot see my face, for no one can see me and live.
John 1:18 No one has seen God at any time.
Genesis 32:30 Jacob saw God face to face, and his life is preserved.
Exodus 33:11 God spoke to Moses face to face
Exodus 33:23 God showed His backside to Moses.
one place God said no one can't see me but other place He says Jacob and Moses saw face to face to God.
Genesis 3:14, Isaiah 65:25 God says the serpent eat dust, and the dust will be the food of serpent.
today even a child knows that snake does not eat dust.
not a single Zoology book says that serpent eat dust.
@@UmarAli-ff2fx anything to say that applies to the information presented in this video? Your using prepackaged Polemics that many (if not a vast majority) have see before. It is very very boring. Have you ever read one whole chapter of any verse you have referenced?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
@@gilbertjones9157 Bible is the book of Devil!
shameful things in the Bible!
Isaiah 20:2-3 God command to the prophet Isaiah to walk naked for 3 years.
how God command such a shameful thing and how Isaiah walk in front of his mother, daughters, sisters and other people naked.
Ezekiel 4:12 God is telling to his prophet to eat barley cakes and bake it with dung that coming out of man in their sight.
Malachi 2:3 dung on your faces, shit on your faces.
in the book of God, God is talking!
Jeremiah 20:7 Bible says, God is deceiver.
Can you imagine that, does God deceive somebody ?
Revelation 13:1-2 the beast with 7 heads.
have you seen such animal ?
Leviticus 11:20-21 (KJV) among abomination the fowls with 4 legs is abomination for you.
But in (NIV) and other modern Bibles says "all flying insects" not fowl.
But you know such a fowl and such a insect does not exist in the world, it can be only Dragon 🤣😆🤣
All insects have got 6 legs not 4 !
Matthew 5:17-20 Jesus says Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Why you Christian people are not following the Bible? Why you are not doing the commandments of God ?
Bible says eating pork is prohibited, forbidden!
Leviticus 11:7-8, Deuteronomy 14:8 the flesh of pork is unclean, don't eat flesh of swine, it's unclean for you.
We muslims we don't eat pork but you christians eating pork.
Bible says Alcohol is forbidden!
Ephesians 5:18, Proverbs 20:1 And be not drunk with wine.
We muslims we don't drink alcohol but you christians drinking.
Christians must be circumcised!
Genesis 17:9-12 God said unto Abraham, every man child among you must be circumcised.
Genesis 17:14 And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
Leviticus 12:1-3 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a woman have conceived seed, and born a man child: then she shall be unclean seven days; according to the days of the separation for her infirmity shall she be unclean.
And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.
Luke 2:21 even Jesus was circumcised.
We muslims are circumcised but you christians are not.
Bible says that the woman must cover her head, like the muslim woman wearing hijab!
1 Corinthians 11:5-6 the woman must cover her head, but if she does not cover her head, she must shaved her head.
Now tell me who is more christian and who is following Jesus ?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
wine in the Bible is 100% alcohol.
Genesis 19:30-36 read this verse, you will see wine in the Bible is 100% alcohol !
Genesis 9:21-23 When he drank some of its wine, he became drunk and lay naked inside his tent.
Proverbs 31:6-7 God says give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts.
Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more.
this devilish advice given by God in the Bible!!!
John 2:1-11 first miracle what Jesus is done He turned water into wine, therefore all Christian people is alcoholic and drunken !
Jannah has a river of wine in it.
@@_John_P that river of wine in Jannah! not in this world!
Have you seen a river of wine in the world?
That river of wine is not alchohol like wine in the Bible!
@@UmarAli-ff2fx How do you know? Have you tasted it?
@@_John_P our Prophet says that wine in Jannah is without alcohol! its mention in Saheeh Hadiths Bukhari and Muslim!
@@UmarAli-ff2fx What's the point of wine without alcohol?
Jesus is not God! He is prophet of God, like other prophets.
Jesus never said that he is God!!!
John 5:30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.
God can do everything, but Jesus said I can't do nothing. how he can be God ?
Jesus doesn't have his own power !
Matthew 28:18 Jesus said All power is given unto me.
given by who ?
John 14:28 Jesus said my Father is greater than I.
John 10:29 Jesus says My Father is greater than all.
if Jesus was God, then He must say that He is greater not Father.
Matthew 19:16-17 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
a man who does not accept to call him good, how He can say to you to call him God?
this verse says Jesus is a man and he didn't do any miracle.
Acts 2:22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:
Luke 2:21 Jesus was circumcised.
can you imagine that, God was circumcised? someone take the penis of God and he is circumcised God.
this man Melchisedec is greater than Jesus.
Hebrews 7:3 Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, He is without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life.
you christians says that Jesus had father and mother and he had the beginning which he born from Mary and he had end which he died on the cross.
but this man Melchisedec doesn't have father and mother and neither beginning of day not end of life.
now tell me who is greater ?
Mark 11:12 Jesus was hungry.
can you imagine hangry God ?
John 11:35 Jesus wept.
can you imagine God is crying like a baby.😭😭😭 does it fit to God ?
a man who need for something he will cry not God but God does not need for anything because He had all power to do.
Jesus is came only for the jews not for the Americans not for the Europeans but only for the jews house of Israel.
Matthew 15:24 Jesus says I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jesus had 4 father ?
Matthew 1:1 Jesus Christ is the son of David and the son of Abraham.
Luke 3:23 Jesus is a son of Joseph.
Mark 1:1 Jesus is the son of God.
who is the father of Jesus ?
is Jesus only the son of God?
Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons
Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son
Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son.
Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God.
who is really the son of God ?
Their are so many different Bible in the world and their are not the same!!!
King James Version has 66 books but in Catholic Version has 73 books
Trinity is not in modern Bibles!!!
1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
This verse you can find only in King James Version and Catholic Version but in all modern Bibles this verse was deleted from the Bible, New International Version, Revised Standard Version and all modern Bibles does not have this verse!!!
Why they deleted this verse? Because your scholars says, Christian scholars says this verse is fabrication and fake, therefore the Christian scholars they thrown out this verse from all modern Bibles, All modern Bibles does not have this verse.
You christians chanting the thing which is fake and fabrication!!!
John 3:16 this verse says Jesus is only begotten Son of God.
this verse "begotten" you can find only in King James Version and Catholic Version but in All modern Bibles does not have this word "begotten"
New International Version, Revised Standard Version and all modern Bibles says that "only son of God" not "begotten"
Why they thrown this word? Because your scholars says, Christian scholars says this word "begotten" is fabrication and fake.
Therefore in all modern Bibles does not have this word.
is Jesus only the son of God?
Genesis 6:2-4 this verse says God had many sons
Exodus 4:22 God says, Israel is my firstborn son
Jeremiah 31:9 God says, Ephraim is my firstborn son.
Luke 3:38 Adam is the son of God.
who is really the son of God ?
Umar Ali is very desperate. Thats why he posts 10 offtopic posts under this video.
Stay on the subject. This video is about Muhammad and this has nothing to do with Christianity. Defend your religion. It needs defending as it seems to be phony.
@Umar Ali I have told you previously that Polemics does not work here. We have seen all of this before and we are not moved. Your expenditure of effort has no effect. Let's see how many different recensions of the Qurans published in Arabic are there? Which one of Hafs seven recensions was the 1924 Cairo addition?
ALERT: This video has sent trigger waves through abdools, breeching their systems and resulting in indiscriminate spewing of scrambled daawah script!!!!!!!!!
.... يا نصراني انت تعبد أرباب كثيرة متعددة منفصلة مختلفة متفرقة وغير متحدة فما السبب..
NASRANY
You worship 3 different Gods not one God not equal not United.. Separated.. Why you worship them.. Enough one God not 3...
He was God in three persons, however they are all God. Also, why does the Quran claim Yeshua to be a prophet when He taught nothing that is advocated by Islam. If Yeshua was not the Son of God, then He was certainly not a prophet of Islam. When did He command his disciples to kill anyone for rejecting the Gospel? When did He say anything about going to Mecca ( which did not even exist during His time) and praying to a Kaaba?
@@larrymonte515
Educate yourself
Jesus said to bring his enemy to him and kill them infront of him (Luke 19:27)
@ب برىء You need to take a course in comparative religion to have an understanding of the theology of Christianity. It is correct that the word Trinity is not found in scripture. Even Hinduism has the idea of God Head but they defiantly believe these are separate deities. Christianity only builds on the Jewish concepts of complexity of God's interaction with Humanity; Creator, Word and Breath. We all know that Judaism is monotheistic but they have at a minimum a Dualistic concept of God. My understanding of this was a reaction to the development of Christianity and not a continuation of their understanding prior to the 1st century CE. This was a reaction to what Jesus pointed out from their own scriptural commentaries.
@Eli Sheets meaning what?
@@aaaabraham837 Educate yourself. Stop using prepackaged Polemics. You are cherry picking out of context and it is a total Fail. This verse is part of a parable, dolt. Read the whole chapter Luke 19. If you respond to this reply I will fry you up like sausage with peppers, mushrooms and spice it will be tasty but for you an antacid will be necessary. PS. Jesus may have said this but it was not His enemies but the enemies of the King of the parable known as the Parable of Talents.