Patek Philippe Nautilus vs Nautilus 5712/1A-001 Moonphase vs Annual Calendar 5726/1A-001

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2019
  • Contact tmosso@thewatchbox.com for pricing and availability; Either I have it, or I can get it! Shop this Annual Calendar: bit.ly/2X4f7Pm
    Shop this Moonphase: bit.ly/2KBptPX
    Shop all Patek Philippe watches: bit.ly/2NSwrhl
    The Patek Philippe Nautilus 5712/1A-001 measures 40mm in diameter, 8.7mm thick, and 48.7mm from lug-to-lug. This Patek Philippe Nautilus Moonphase features a blue gradient dial. The Patek Philippe 5712 Nautilus Moonphase encased in stainless steel surrounding a dial with features of power reserve, date, moon phase, hours, minutes, and seconds. This Patek Philippe is water resistant to 60 meters.
    The Patek Philippe Nautilus Annual Calendar 5726/1A-001 features a 40.5mm stainless steel case surrounding a black and grey gradiated dial on a stainless steel bracelet with folding buckle. Functions of the Nautilus Annual Calendar include hours, minutes, seconds, day, date, month, moon phase, annual calendar and 24-hour indicator. The Nautilus 5726 also measures 11.5mm in thickness and 51.3mm from lug-to-lug. This Patek Philippe watch has a water resistance rating of 120 meters.
    For complete details, watch the full Patek Philippe Nautilus review!
    Please subscribe to our channel for the best luxury watch reviews on TH-cam: th-cam.com/users/WatchBoxRevie...
    Visit our website at www.thewatchbox.com for the latest pre-owned luxury watch arrivals and industry-leading value in previously loved luxury timepieces.
  • แนวปฏิบัติและการใช้ชีวิต

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @rodneydanger543
    @rodneydanger543 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Holy crap. It’s hard to fathom just how impressive these Patek’s are until you see them on the wrist. Gorgeous!

  • @AbdulRWatches
    @AbdulRWatches 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Two unobtainable grail watches right now, but the 5712 is my choice from the both.

  • @zetoch
    @zetoch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great idea to compare those two pieces. On paper they look very similar, but in the metal it’s a different story. Excellent job Tim, as always.

  • @scotts1409
    @scotts1409 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I chose the 5726 because of the beautiful symmetry, and the classic Patel annual calendar.

  • @fozzyarb
    @fozzyarb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love both...have both but the white dial version of the 5726. Both are simply amazing! Great review.

  • @robertosanchez4021
    @robertosanchez4021 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm fortunate enough to have both and both are great everyday watches... by far more comfortable than the AP Royal Oak

  • @polo32892
    @polo32892 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have both; but I like the thinness and elegance of the 5712.

  • @alexandresmirnov9153
    @alexandresmirnov9153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video and explanation. My favourite is a 5712. Hope to see pro video like yours. Good good job. Thank you

  • @damachine3
    @damachine3 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3:59 Not just a blue dial with the new 5726/1A-014, but a very cool blue to black gradient dial. It fades to black as you approach the periphery of the dial. VERY cool. I just bought the 5726A-001 (black dial with leather and polymer straps) from my dealer and he's on the case to get me the 5726/1A-014 (I love the blue to black gradient dial and the steel bracelet). Can't go wrong with any of the 5726 pieces--especially if you are getting them at retail price from an AD!

  • @tonya5389
    @tonya5389 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    5712 has the edge 👌

  • @ratdammooo
    @ratdammooo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    5712 for its thinness

  • @iZacq
    @iZacq 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice review 👌🏻
    Are they just Full Steel or are the screws in white gold, like in AP watch
    I like design of Patek Philippe 👍🏻

  • @graemescott470
    @graemescott470 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love them both but I slightly prefer the 5726 . But more sporty but still sophisticated

  • @mlamesq8
    @mlamesq8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The one the AD puts you on the list for is the one to choose.

  • @kevorknourian5442
    @kevorknourian5442 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome show and watch

  • @stevelee8437
    @stevelee8437 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I was just lucky enough to get the 5726. Love it! I didn’t get a choice, but I would have chosen the same anyway. Great reviews! Keep up the good work.

    • @ashkanentesari2254
      @ashkanentesari2254 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Steve Lee nice! Were you able to get it new or preowned?

  • @bossdefender8037
    @bossdefender8037 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great comparison, Tim! 🙂 But is there any logical reason for Patek to use pins instead of screws?

  • @Stevah00
    @Stevah00 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was so disappointed when my brother told me that the 5726 -014 had a waiting list, of several years. It is not holy but a true grail watch.

  • @andrei2023
    @andrei2023 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My winner is 5712🥇

  • @DavidDatura
    @DavidDatura 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those pre-owned price premiums (a triple P rhyme! 😁) are absolutely crazy! And it’s odd that the lume on one is so much brighter than the other. As for which to choose? That’s so difficult I can’t actually decide. Mind you, if I had the means to purchase the one, I’d likely have the means to purchase the two! Which is what I’d do (another little rhyme).

  • @ayoolaonajide5094
    @ayoolaonajide5094 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am fortunate to have the 5712 and it’s a fantastic watch. The jury is still out for me as I think I prefer the micro rotor . I also have the 5205G with the larger rotor with the same movement as the 5726 and I had problems of misalignment within the window just within 2 years of ownership.

  • @MrLSB4ever
    @MrLSB4ever ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5726 on bracelet best nautilus combo.

  • @tygaz3061
    @tygaz3061 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    so happy just received my 5712/1a with a beautiful blue dial. i ordered it and got it in 3 months... when i got the call i was like holy shit!! anyway.... i coulda gotten the 5711 but i think its to plain... compared to 5726 i like the 12 cause of thin case and light weight.. imho

  • @pete6705
    @pete6705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tough call, but I think I give the edge to 5726

  • @BossHugo84
    @BossHugo84 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    5726 THE MOST PERFECT WATCH EVER MADE TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MC-dh3my
    @MC-dh3my 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice idea to put the two watches one on the other and let them feel the steel

  • @brokebikemtb4448
    @brokebikemtb4448 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As I just purchased the 5726 .......I'll say not even a competition....5726 for the win....higher beat rate ...newer complication annual calendar....edit 110k boys 5726 for the win

  • @danny77670000
    @danny77670000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5726 for me 👍🏻👏🏻

  • @williamstalvey6920
    @williamstalvey6920 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Must be an incredible watch, I am a huge fan of divers watches with a bezel but certainly would love to become more knowledgeable about this fine product.

  • @MARKO2465
    @MARKO2465 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    5726 for me....5712 too much happening on that small dial.

  • @DanteMiami
    @DanteMiami 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer the 5726 (especially with the new blue dial) for the same reasons, though the 5712 would fit me better and has that micro-rotor!

  • @para_bellum_1984
    @para_bellum_1984 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    God I wish I could put that 5726 on my grail list. It is the summary of everything I love about Patek. But then you notice the grey market prices. I don't even want to know the AD wait list for first time Patek customers.

  • @tygaz3061
    @tygaz3061 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    definitely 5712... i think its the best of the nautilus line... even the 5711... yeah i know... 5711 bec of the simplicity and symmetry.... yadda yadda yadda.... BORING...

  • @craig2100
    @craig2100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Simple....buy both

  • @bekind1784
    @bekind1784 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    5726 me...not even close

  • @highnrising
    @highnrising 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The 5726, no contest. It's a great watch.
    The 5712 is missing the hour indicators for 4, 5 and 7 o'clock--due to the two sub-dials. Sorry, that's a design defect. It never should have been made like that.

  • @carljosephbuca2070
    @carljosephbuca2070 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why are the pre-owned more expensive than brand new??

  • @Diirk
    @Diirk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    5712 is too thin, it looks unimpressively flat, just like a jumbo, so I take the 5726

  • @giovannipasa8264
    @giovannipasa8264 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sicuramente 5726.....più armonico, più presente al polso e più moderno....il 5712 acciaio quadrante troppo affollato e troppo leggero (lo preferisco in oro bianco o rosa...)

  • @yuribonalumi8053
    @yuribonalumi8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Non mi piace ne uno ne l' altro. Con quei soldi do l' acconto per una casa porca eva!!😁😄😄👍

  • @SLSAMG
    @SLSAMG 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will never understand the appeal of a posh watch. Incredibly superficial people will delude themselves into calling it "an art".

    • @ChrisBoulas
      @ChrisBoulas 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Explain what's not artistic about it?