Beautiful Aircraft!! Felicito a todos los técnicos Españoles que ayudaron en el desarrollo de esta aeronave!!! Hermosa aeronave!!! Saludos desde México!!!
Los técnicos españoles NO AYUDARON sino que CREARON el C -295, de hecho, el nombre original es el C-295 CASA, CASA la empresa española que se fusionó y posteriormente dió lugar a Airbus hoy en dia...
An excellent choice for the RCAF to replace the aging Buffalos and the inefficient C-130s with the added bonus of being less reliant upon American defense contractors.
@Damien Robison Apparently, sartech mannequins in full jump gear would hit the tail on their way out during simulated jumps...not good. Vortex generators were added to help change the airflow wrapping under and around the aft ramp door.
@Damien Robison it sounds like we bought this plane without bothering to ask the crew what they actually need to carry out their missions. What was good or bad about the Buffalo? How should we make things better? Oh nvm here's a luxury SUV in the sky for ya, has less range, less power to weight ratio, have fun!
The C-295 is manufactured and assembled in the Airbus Defence and Space facilities in San Pablo Airport, located in Seville, Spain. It is a development of the Spanish-Indonesian transport aircraft CASA/IPTN CN-235, but with a stretched fuselage, 50% more payload capability
I love that cheatline. You don't normally see stuff like that on government/military aircraft anymore. The USCG HC-144 also looks pretty good with its cutter racing stripe.
Beautiful aircraft Airbus. Congratulations for all Spanish, German, French and other Europeans involving this development,surely will be more contracts.
@@uscaritus El avion es español, de motor a alas, igual que el cn235, no fue NADA de europa, puede ser que la empresa CASA, se haya hido con otras empresas europeas pero cuando lo construyeron era 100% español y ahora igual, no es ni de airbus y ni de alemania francia ni de nadie, es español
The Canadian air force are already experienced problems with the aircraft, even before it officially enters service. There is a delay certifying the aircraft due to center of gravity issues as a result of modifications of the S &R version for Canada and problems with S&R paratroopers jumping from the back ramp. It seems when they tested it, paratrooper dummies were hitting the tail. The Canadian air force really wanted the C-27j is a superior aircraft. Far bigger cabin, more powerful engines, has an APU , flies faster and more robust design.
From most angles it is quite a handsome plane and from all viewpoints it is very robust looking. Glad to see our armed forces getting some decent new kit. Hope someone makes a version of this for MSFS 2020!
I mean the RCAF was practically begging for the Spartan as it fit in perfectly with their requirements and offered commonality with the existing fleet of C-130Js. But that doesn't make the C-295 a poor pick, it still is a pretty darn impressive plane.
@@AirShark95 I agree with everything you said. Why the C-295 won over the C27 Spartan is because the C295 has Pratt & Whitney Canada engines and the C27 doesn't. If the govn't picked the C27 then people would be crying that they aren't supporting Canadian companies (P&WC) and with the C295 winning those same people say that the C27 is the better mission capable aircraft and bitch we didn't pick it. Either way it's a no win situation for the govn't. Just glad we have some new iron in this role and will miss the Buff.
Very impressive aircraft . Ireland has two on order , hopefully to be delivered shortly . Along with this aircraft I was sorry to see CANADA go for F35 rather than SAAB GRIPEN .
I was sort of pulling for the C27J because of the commonality with the C130J but this thing will definitely do. Too bad, they didn't procure some armed versions of the 295 would have probably been useful to the army
Fusion is a nice set up for south of the artic circle, we use the same avionics in the Alberta Air Ambulance King Air fleet. I wonder how they will operate north of the Circle with Proline fusion?
Can't believe all the glowing comments.....from what I have heard, it is not popular with the crews that have to use them due to various shortcomings.......
Dehavilland Canada has taken control of building dash8 400s. Viking is building twin otters , now has the manufacturing rights of beaver, otter (twin too), caribou ,buffalo , dash 8 200s n 300s
That's a nice looking plane, great job Airbus! Tho, the fact that the Canadian government has asked this new plane to the europeans shows how Bombardier is not doing good right now. Being from Quebec and in the aviation industry (as a student), it hurts.
Self reliance, as far as a country can be, especially in national defence and security matters, is a huge plus! Although i am not Canadian, never the less, as a New Zealander, i can appreciate your sentiment. And it is not my intention to simply knock this aircraft. It may be the best option for what is wanted. But i certainly know Canada has, or did have a well established aviation design and manufacturing sector. I must look into it more.
We do. But it's staying focused on civilian passenger aircrafts. Can't do it all. And Bombardier is busy building LOTS of planes with Airbus. Anyways, we got something nice so...
Casa se fusiono con airbus y el CN295 se fabrica en la misma factoria del A400M en sevilla esta version es la de rescate y salvamento marino en este cado para. Canada
Wheel covers will get fouled n damaged by long grass , snow , mud n slush. Wheel tyre pressure is too high for many soft field ops. Far more suitable , cheaper n homegrown for Viking to make a new batch of dash8 -200s or 300s. Rear loading ramp could be developed if really necessary.
need4speed I’m not a huge fan of Trudeau, but the CF-18 and especially the Snow Birds CT-114s were already aging under Martin and Harper, so why didn’t they replace them?
Leo Gibney Canadians can't blame any and all issues with the CFs on Trudeau I mean he's only been in charge of the country for just over 4 years and he's arguably already done more for the navy than any other pm in a long time.
need4speed The F-35 is the world's most expensive paperweight the initial cost and maintenance prices are ridiculously high, they can't travel as far as F-18s, they only have one engine, they're not as fast or agile as the 4th gen fighters and considering that you guys need at least 90 jets the F-35s would be far too costly. The F-18 Super Hornet or Rafale are the best two choices for Canada. Good luck from south of the border 🇺🇸❤️🇨🇦
This aircraft may have applications in some environments, but Canada is so vast, and its weather conditions so extreme, that the C-130 and the P-3 Orion are better platforms for long range SAR operations in Arctic and sub-Arctic conditions.
The C295 is probably intended for coastal SAR operations as well as SAR operations in non-arctic regions. At least one of these aircraft will likely be stationed at Canadian Forces Base Trenton in southern Ontario. With a range of 5630km, one C295 could cover virtually all of Ontario as well as its Great Lakes shorelines.
Spain is a very mixed country, a lot of people all over the world come to live here and then we mix them together, morrocans, Rumanians,Bulgarians, British, Russians, Ecuadorians, Argentinans to mention only few come to live in Spain
Owing to the large area of coverage this plane has to cover, just what is the range and endurance? Up in the polar region, you are a long way from fuel and landing areas. It looks like a good aircraft with all of the bells and whistles to help in locating people and ships in trouble. My concern is the effective search and rescue range of this aircraft. They mentioned about 8% increase but I do not believe the C295, in any versions, had a very long range to begin with.
We blew enough money on Bombardier, i.e. the execs getting bonuses for endless incompetence, that we moved on and spent the few dollars left more wisely.
The obsession of Canadian politicians of hiring incompetent management has completely destroyed the aeronautical industry in our country, whether is for the benefit of other countries' industries or just plain stupidity is hard to tell. No one in the government has thought of hiring good enough management to bring the industry up without bailouts, which in the end goes to fill the pockets of those who make the bad decisions.
@@Bushy_P C-27J was the right option....and the plane the RCAF wanted. But we have these stupid, useless, corrupt, things called liberals here. Who are known for their hatred of veterans and our military.
@@lanagro jajajajajaja, sorry, hahaha, better the An-225 so you buy 50 and Canada get in bankruptcy. You can complaint about range but the rest is more than enough for SAR. The C-27 has a wider & taller hull useful for transporting big but light stuff, the C-295 has the perfect body for people, small vehicles or even 3 Eurojets..
unbelievable performances of the landing gear!!! where did that come from??? do u mean to say the C295 has a sturdy landing gear??? anyway AIRBUS needs to reinforce the C295's front & rear landing gear & furthermore both the front & rear main (wheeled) landing gears needs to be longer & taller by 26%-30% at the very least, in the interest of better ground clearance & minimizing foreign object damage to the C295's fuselage under belly when operating from unpaved rough air strips!!! the C295 is a good well engineered medium-sized cargo aircraft, way better than the An-26!!!
@@jameson1239 "sort" of a problem he says, cute. You sound like a c295 salesman trying to push that 1.9m dimension as adequate. Tell us, how much of the width of the cabin is that 1.9m? Roughly 1 foot. Now factor in the SAR techs' in the back who have helmets on that add several inches of bulk, and also have to carry hundreds of pounds of equipment now in a hunch position, only to static line out the back and strike the table. Laughably inadequate aircraft.
@@MrCdrant 1.9 metres is just the height of the cargo bay if it was the full volume I would have said cubic metres or square metres the dimensions of the cargo bay are as follows length 12.96 metres width 2.70 metres height 1.9 metres total cargo bay volume 69.09 cubic metres the buffalo has a total volume of 44.74 cubic metres but it is far taller at 2 metres tall then 1.9 metres tall but again what percentage of SARTechs are over 1.8 metres tall? and there’s the vortex issue which is I believe being worked on don’t really know how there going to fix it though we probably should have bought the C-27j spartan but well this was cheaper so here we are
@@jameson1239 "what percentage of SARTechs are over 1.8 metres tall?" Nearly all of them when they put a helmet on, they add several inches of height. You're also ignoring that that's only the centre of the fuselage, not even accounting for moving around, passing other people. It's a shit aircraft that is going to cause hundreds of people throughout its lifespan to have real neck and back injuries.
Gonna piss off some of you.... CANADA has a rich history of building aircraft from deHavilian to avero to bombardier.. why on hell did they allow scarebus to make a plane that should be unique designed and built for CANADA..
Canada manufacturer of legendary Canuck, Arrow, Caribou, Buffalo, CL215-415, Beaver, Otter, TwinOtter, Dash 6-7-8 and Bombardier CRJs give Airbus a mouthful of moldy bread in 2020 not even able to build a transport plane. Yes it looks good this device but leaves a bitter taste.
Um we could use some jet fighters. Maybe we can convert this thing into a fighter plane. Would be better than the crappy old CF-18 s and second hand junk we bought off the Aussies.
''second hand junk we bought off the Aussies.'' Steady on.....old man......a steal.....''never used in combat....only flown to church on Sundays'''......pristine, new leather smell.....''junk''....you were lucky to get em.......:-)
@@SuperSetright We're lucky to have any planes at all in our piece of garbage air force. It's a joke Canada can't even defend itself. I've been a pilot since 1984 and have come across many ex-forces pilots and aircrew over the years. You don't even want to hear some of the horror stories. The whole irony of buying the Aussie jets is that the were upgraded here in Canada. Those F-18s were flown pretty hard by the Aussie pilots even if they didn't see any combat.
Great video of a great plane. I wish the Canadian FWSAR livery could have been updated with this new aircraft. It's SOO ugly. It's not even good 'retro'!
The livery isn't meant to be pretty. It's designed to help people easily and quickly identify the aircraft and its purpose. If you're lost in the woods or stranded in a boat way out on one of the great lakes or far from shore in the Atlantic or Pacific regions, you're not going to care about the livery of the aircraft that has been sent to rescue you. You'll notice that the rescue aircraft is big, it's yellow and help is on the way.
We still can and do our government just doesn’t buy them look at Viking air based in Victoria they have the rights to build all of DHC and bombardiers old stuff
Shit, we bought 56 of these? WTF. Why didn't we license build these? Or buy the V-22 Osprey instead and build out of the Bell Helicopter plant in Montreal? The Trudeau government is so fucking stupid.
Umm less range a V-22s ferry range is about 4130km the C-295s is 5728km smaller cargo bay V-22 19.57 cubic metres C-295 65cubic metres and at least 20millon dollars more expensive for the base airframe for the ability to do a vertical take off and landing which is redundant because we already have the CH-149
Nice aircraft for groomed runways but, what about the rest of Canada. Did we really have to outsource when we have a perfectly good manufacturing sector... oh sorry, we gave that away to the Airbus people!
I suppose this is PM Trudeaux’s ABA policy (anything but American). The C-130J is 100 mph faster, has twice the range and has a payload that is well over twice that of the C295. The C-130 has a track record of being rugged and reliable and can supply some of the most inhospitable places on the earth. Oh well, I guess you get what you pay for.
Canada already operates the C-130J. It's too large for this mission and can't get into the same strips as the C295 (or for that matter the DHC-5 Buffalo that the C295 replaces)
@@adam_mawz_maas We fly Casa's (USCG), but call it HC-144 Ocean Sentry. I think the version Canada is getting is better than ours. I crewed on HC130H's, we go way out in the ocean for SAR's and other searches. Casa has no where near the range of our C130. We landed our C130 on French Frigate Shoals. th-cam.com/video/kahvPpXWbKI/w-d-xo.html to evac people, never mind landing on an aircraft carrier. I am sure a C295 is more economical to use for some missions, which is why USCG has medium range SAR planes. But if you have to fly 1000+ miles out into the ocean and then conduct your search, you are not flying in a C295. The one in this vid is a really good looking and I am sure highly functional plane for the missions it was designed for. Also, Canada has P3's for long range.
![Canada's Next Fixed Wing SAR Air-Frame [FWSAR]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UFldVi0m9Kw/mqdefault.jpg)
![🔴 ฟุตบอลแชมป์กีฬา 7HD แชมเปียน คัพ 2024 [รอบรองชนะเลิศ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zPm8ClLVhoE/mqdefault.jpg)
Beautiful bird we thank you from Canada
I am a fan of 'mission specific' aircraft. Good for Canada.
Beautiful Aircraft!! Felicito a todos los técnicos Españoles que ayudaron en el desarrollo de esta aeronave!!! Hermosa aeronave!!! Saludos desde México!!!
Los técnicos españoles NO AYUDARON sino que CREARON el C -295, de hecho, el nombre original es el C-295 CASA, CASA la empresa española que se fusionó y posteriormente dió lugar a Airbus hoy en dia...
@@tigreblanco7170 si, eso si lo sabía. Creo que tal vez no elegí las palabras correctas para expresarme. De todas maneras, gracias por la información.
@@gabole1 De nada, un saludo.
instablaster.
Tanto ayudaron, que lo crearon ellos. ¡Saludos a nuestros hermanos, que no hijos, mejicanos, desde la Zaragoza de España!
I am India and this a very well built/engineered aircraft.
An excellent choice for the RCAF to replace the aging Buffalos and the inefficient C-130s with the added bonus of being less reliant upon American defense contractors.
To be specific, C-130H's. Not saying you didn't know though just so that others know Canada does operate J models as well.
@Damien Robison We already operate C-130J's.
@Damien Robison For SAR, the 295W is an excellent choice. The Super Hercules would be overkill and wouldn't have the loiter time required.
@Damien Robison Apparently, sartech mannequins in full jump gear would hit the tail on their way out during simulated jumps...not good. Vortex generators were added to help change the airflow wrapping under and around the aft ramp door.
@Damien Robison it sounds like we bought this plane without bothering to ask the crew what they actually need to carry out their missions. What was good or bad about the Buffalo? How should we make things better? Oh nvm here's a luxury SUV in the sky for ya, has less range, less power to weight ratio, have fun!
An impressive acquisition that will last decades.
Just impressive... Thank you for all the impressions about this plane.
Canada takes care of it`s citizens.
The C-295 is manufactured and assembled in the Airbus Defence and Space facilities in San Pablo Airport, located in Seville, Spain.
It is a development of the Spanish-Indonesian transport aircraft CASA/IPTN CN-235, but with a stretched fuselage, 50% more payload capability
C295 for Switzerland!
🇨🇭
For Germany
Great work in Seville!
I love that cheatline. You don't normally see stuff like that on government/military aircraft anymore.
The USCG HC-144 also looks pretty good with its cutter racing stripe.
Beautiful aircraft Airbus.
Congratulations for all Spanish, German, French and other Europeans involving this development,surely will be more contracts.
The plane was manufactured and it is Spanish, not from Europe
@@mtrd9388 The original development yes, but the European companies have merged and it already belongs to Airbus Defense division.
@@mtrd9388 Spain is in Europe
@@uscaritus El avion es español, de motor a alas, igual que el cn235, no fue NADA de europa, puede ser que la empresa CASA, se haya hido con otras empresas europeas pero cuando lo construyeron era 100% español y ahora igual, no es ni de airbus y ni de alemania francia ni de nadie, es español
@@mtrd9388 cn235 and cn295 is cooperation between Spain and Indonesia
Gorgeous aircraft! Love it!
Canada purchased 16 of these birds.
I'm 56, I probably won't live long enough to see these replaced.
The way this country buys military hardware your great,great, great grandchildren might see a replacement but somehow I doubt it!
@@rldukes4 get real
The Canadian air force are already experienced problems with the aircraft, even before it officially enters service. There is a delay certifying the aircraft due to center of gravity issues as a result of modifications of the S &R version for Canada and problems with S&R paratroopers jumping from the back ramp. It seems when they tested it, paratrooper dummies were hitting the tail. The Canadian air force really wanted the C-27j is a superior aircraft. Far bigger cabin, more powerful engines, has an APU , flies faster and more robust design.
Good choice Canada 🇨🇦!
@Damien Robison what do you mean by far from good? Could you please explain the technical reasons. Thanks.
@Damien Robison
Price C-27J 50M$ C-295 30M$
Range 5.900Km 5.700
Number built. 53 160...
Using the C-130J its like using a Humvee for cutting the grass, too big, too expensive and Greater costs per flying hour.
Beautiful! Great job Airbus and suppliers!
Great job. Fantastic aircraft
Another innovative aircraft. This aircraft will help save lives.
From most angles it is quite a handsome plane and from all viewpoints it is very robust looking. Glad to see our armed forces getting some decent new kit. Hope someone makes a version of this for MSFS 2020!
@Damien Robison That's pretty bad. Why did they buy it?
@@stephenjones8928 You have no idea what you are talking about.
I never claimed to. @@techdefined9420
Canada got this procurement right!
Hahaha no the federal government can never get it right.
I mean the RCAF was practically begging for the Spartan as it fit in perfectly with their requirements and offered commonality with the existing fleet of C-130Js. But that doesn't make the C-295 a poor pick, it still is a pretty darn impressive plane.
@@AirShark95 I agree with everything you said. Why the C-295 won over the C27 Spartan is because the C295 has Pratt & Whitney Canada engines and the C27 doesn't. If the govn't picked the C27 then people would be crying that they aren't supporting Canadian companies (P&WC) and with the C295 winning those same people say that the C27 is the better mission capable aircraft and bitch we didn't pick it. Either way it's a no win situation for the govn't. Just glad we have some new iron in this role and will miss the Buff.
all I can say is that it's better than the fighter program or the CH148 program...
@@rcl998 Lol we actually got something this time!
F***ing gorgeous!
Very impressive aircraft . Ireland has two on order , hopefully to be delivered shortly . Along with this aircraft I was sorry to see CANADA go for F35 rather than SAAB GRIPEN .
Beautiful plane.
Bangladesh Navy needs this very badly for further search and rescue. 🇧🇩
Yeah awesome. A SAR aircraft for use from austere locations with no APU. Good purchase DND.
Enfin......vraiment un très bon choix!!!!
I was sort of pulling for the C27J because of the commonality with the C130J but this thing will definitely do. Too bad, they didn't procure some armed versions of the 295 would have probably been useful to the army
The C295 Flyfisher.
Because of all the lovely streams and rivers in Canada and the fact it looks like its wearing hip waders.
@Damien Robison just be funny or is it a lemon?
Fusion is a nice set up for south of the artic circle, we use the same avionics in the Alberta Air Ambulance King Air fleet. I wonder how they will operate north of the Circle with Proline fusion?
nice that Canada choose the Spanish CASA for this tasks.
Hoping for Airbus to pitch an ASW/MPA C295 to the Philippine Air Force
Yeah. Stunning!
Kickass mods on this beautiful bird! 👍👍
@Airbus Any update on Indian C295W deal?
Nice 👍🏼.
Malaysian SAR should look forward to this aircraft.
buy from Indonesia la
To say the acquisition and rollout has been problematic would be an understatement. Oh, and watch your head.
Wooow this plane look amazing!
Can't believe all the glowing comments.....from what I have heard, it is not popular with the crews that have to use them due to various shortcomings.......
And yet it’s still not operational
Brilliant
Excellently done airbus
The Canadian Government kept this acquisition quiet......but, it is an impressive aircraft. To bad Canada does not build aircraft anymore.
Now all we need are impressive people in our military.
they do build aircraft in canada
Canada builds Airbus A220, Bombardier business jets and also DHC-6-400 Twin Otters.
@@Republic3D 👆 exactly
Dehavilland Canada has taken control of building dash8 400s. Viking is building twin otters , now has the manufacturing rights of beaver, otter (twin too), caribou ,buffalo , dash 8 200s n 300s
Excellent salesman! I´ll take two please!
Great airplane for SAR!
That's a nice looking plane, great job Airbus!
Tho, the fact that the Canadian government has asked this new plane to the europeans shows how Bombardier is not doing good right now. Being from Quebec and in the aviation industry (as a student), it hurts.
Self reliance, as far as a country can be, especially in national defence and security matters, is a huge plus! Although i am not Canadian, never the less, as a New Zealander, i can appreciate your sentiment. And it is not my intention to simply knock this aircraft. It may be the best option for what is wanted. But i certainly know Canada has, or did have a well established aviation design and manufacturing sector. I must look into it more.
We do. But it's staying focused on civilian passenger aircrafts. Can't do it all. And Bombardier is busy building LOTS of planes with Airbus. Anyways, we got something nice so...
Looks like a nice plane
She's beautiful
Hermoso avión.
Primero que me toca ver de ala alta con windglets.
Casa se fusiono con airbus y el CN295 se fabrica en la misma factoria del A400M en sevilla esta version es la de rescate y salvamento marino en este cado para. Canada
💪
How much does it cost.
Sweet
is there anywhere I can buy the shirt the presenter is wearing? Canadian Airbus pilot here would LOVE to get my hands on that shirt.
Yes, straight away from Airbus: www.airbus-shop.com/en/men/806-executive-airbus-polo-shirt.html
@@marneus I'm looking for the one the presenter is wearing... With the RCAF roundel
What's the SINGLE ENGINE PERFORMANCE ??
India is going to buy 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
It means it is funtastic 😎😎😎😎😎
Do you know its range ? (Way back included)
Is that race car yellow with pink stripes just axing.
Looks great- too bad its been delayed for 'unforeseeable' circumstances...
Nice plane! We build nose at Warsovia. Pozdrowienia z Polski :)
Does this replace the buffalo? Im not familiar with Canadian AF fleet
yes Buffaloes are very old
Wheel covers will get fouled n damaged by long grass , snow , mud n slush. Wheel tyre pressure is too high for many soft field ops.
Far more suitable , cheaper n homegrown for Viking to make a new batch of dash8 -200s or 300s. Rear loading ramp could be developed if really necessary.
Don’t think this is supposed to land on improvised airfields or fields like the Buffalo could
Is that a yoke in an airbus?
now all we need is some new fighters damnit!
Leo Gibney Your classic Hornets are still awesome and very capable aircraft. You guys can probably still get another 5-10 years out of them.
need4speed I’m not a huge fan of Trudeau, but the CF-18 and especially the Snow Birds CT-114s were already aging under Martin and Harper, so why didn’t they replace them?
Leo Gibney Canadians can't blame any and all issues with the CFs on Trudeau I mean he's only been in charge of the country for just over 4 years and he's arguably already done more for the navy than any other pm in a long time.
Why is it that the Yanks will no sell Super Hornets to Canada. The F-18 "design" is solid.
need4speed The F-35 is the world's most expensive paperweight the initial cost and maintenance prices are ridiculously high, they can't travel as far as F-18s, they only have one engine, they're not as fast or agile as the 4th gen fighters and considering that you guys need at least 90 jets the F-35s would be far too costly.
The F-18 Super Hornet or Rafale are the best two choices for Canada.
Good luck from south of the border 🇺🇸❤️🇨🇦
This aircraft may have applications in some environments, but Canada is so vast, and its weather conditions so extreme, that the C-130 and the P-3 Orion are better platforms for long range SAR operations in Arctic and sub-Arctic conditions.
The C295 is probably intended for coastal SAR operations as well as SAR operations in non-arctic regions. At least one of these aircraft will likely be stationed at Canadian Forces Base Trenton in southern Ontario. With a range of 5630km, one C295 could cover virtually all of Ontario as well as its Great Lakes shorelines.
India is buyjng 56 of these . Very nice 😀
Hopefully noisy interior traditional in Casa's has been fixed..it fillls very low ... What about landing on ice strips...? No comments?
they are canadian. they are almost born on the ice. im sure they know how.
Congradulations to Airdus and Canada
Too bad it doesn't land on water. That could have been the modern day Catalina. Still a great looking aircraft
That’s sort of a thing already the CL-415 and 515 though there not used for SAR in Canada at least
I want one.
U fixed it! 😂
😉
not sure this aircraft will reach mission conclusion...time will tell
We'll get back to ya when they're found fit for service. As delivered there's just a few "minor" flaws. 🤦♂️
It's late eh! Get it in gear Airbus! Don't be a Hoser eh! Kingfishers Missing in Action MIA so far!
Same with N295 PTDI?
Yes . C295 is developing from CN235 ( Cassa Spain and PT. DI Indonesia )🇪🇸🇮🇩
@@jualrumahdanrumahdijual Cassa Nurtanio
How did that Spanish dude end up with a last name like Degenhardt
Spain is a very mixed country, a lot of people all over the world come to live here and then we mix them together, morrocans, Rumanians,Bulgarians, British, Russians, Ecuadorians, Argentinans to mention only few come to live in Spain
Spain has had famous people born in Spain with surnames like O'Donell, Kinderland...
Are these for sale
Roger Rarebit yes then I shall put one in my garage
Comrade Murderer, just 30M$ for the cheapest transport version.
Not a single word oon the powerplant?
P&W I would think.
Bangladesh Army Has one
another one on Order.
Owing to the large area of coverage this plane has to cover, just what is the range and endurance? Up in the polar region, you are a long way from fuel and landing areas. It looks like a good aircraft with all of the bells and whistles to help in locating people and ships in trouble. My concern is the effective search and rescue range of this aircraft. They mentioned about 8% increase but I do not believe the C295, in any versions, had a very long range to begin with.
C295 has 5630 km range ... probably on ferry, much less loaded for bear.
When a country spends millions of dollars buying new equipment they normally check if the product can deliver the expected performance.
@Damien Robison what would have been a better choice? There can't be many that would fit the range requirements.
@@almerindaromeira8352 yes but this is Canada where logic and government purchasing don’t usually go hand in hand
So why can't we build our own aircraft
We blew enough money on Bombardier, i.e. the execs getting bonuses for endless incompetence, that we moved on and spent the few dollars left more wisely.
The obsession of Canadian politicians of hiring incompetent management has completely destroyed the aeronautical industry in our country, whether is for the benefit of other countries' industries or just plain stupidity is hard to tell. No one in the government has thought of hiring good enough management to bring the industry up without bailouts, which in the end goes to fill the pockets of those who make the bad decisions.
They made if faster & smarter for Canada. Translation: Other countries got slower, dumber junk.
@Damien Robison In your opinion, what would have been a better option for Canadian SAR?
@@Bushy_P C-27J
@@Bushy_P C-27J was the right option....and the plane the RCAF wanted. But we have these stupid, useless, corrupt, things called liberals here. Who are known for their hatred of veterans and our military.
@@lanagro jajajajajaja, sorry, hahaha, better the An-225 so you buy 50 and Canada get in bankruptcy.
You can complaint about range but the rest is more than enough for SAR. The C-27 has a wider & taller hull useful for transporting big but light stuff, the C-295 has the perfect body for people, small vehicles or even 3 Eurojets..
Price C27 50M$ C-295 30M$
Range 5.900Km 5.700
Number built. 53 160...
unbelievable performances of the landing gear!!! where did that come from??? do u mean to say the C295 has a sturdy landing gear??? anyway AIRBUS needs to reinforce the C295's front & rear landing gear & furthermore both the front & rear main (wheeled) landing gears needs to be longer & taller by 26%-30% at the very least, in the interest of better ground clearance & minimizing foreign object damage to the C295's fuselage under belly when operating from unpaved rough air strips!!! the C295 is a good well engineered medium-sized cargo aircraft, way better than the An-26!!!
It's ok, no one needed to be able to stand up in it or parachute out safely...
Rear bay height is 1.9m which is taller then 99% of the global population however the vortex issue is sort of a problem
@@jameson1239 "sort" of a problem he says, cute.
You sound like a c295 salesman trying to push that 1.9m dimension as adequate. Tell us, how much of the width of the cabin is that 1.9m? Roughly 1 foot. Now factor in the SAR techs' in the back who have helmets on that add several inches of bulk, and also have to carry hundreds of pounds of equipment now in a hunch position, only to static line out the back and strike the table.
Laughably inadequate aircraft.
@@MrCdrant 1.9 metres is just the height of the cargo bay if it was the full volume I would have said cubic metres or square metres the dimensions of the cargo bay are as follows length 12.96 metres width 2.70 metres height 1.9 metres total cargo bay volume 69.09 cubic metres the buffalo has a total volume of 44.74 cubic metres but it is far taller at 2 metres tall then 1.9 metres tall but again what percentage of SARTechs are over 1.8 metres tall? and there’s the vortex issue which is I believe being worked on don’t really know how there going to fix it though we probably should have bought the C-27j spartan but well this was cheaper so here we are
@@jameson1239 "what percentage of SARTechs are over 1.8 metres tall?"
Nearly all of them when they put a helmet on, they add several inches of height. You're also ignoring that that's only the centre of the fuselage, not even accounting for moving around, passing other people. It's a shit aircraft that is going to cause hundreds of people throughout its lifespan to have real neck and back injuries.
@@MrCdrant
So they stand all the time?
Wake up.
What no Flight Engineer.
Compro 500 unidades para a força aéria brasileira e o projeto e a tecnologia para o Brasil
Gonna piss off some of you.... CANADA has a rich history of building aircraft from deHavilian to avero to bombardier.. why on hell did they allow scarebus to make a plane that should be unique designed and built for CANADA..
CS program.......now A220. Did you really need to ask that question? ;)
Because the conservatives have been aggressively and enthusiastically dismantling our aerospace sector since 1958
Apperently it was offered a modernized CC-115
Canada manufacturer of legendary Canuck, Arrow, Caribou, Buffalo, CL215-415, Beaver, Otter, TwinOtter, Dash 6-7-8 and Bombardier CRJs give Airbus a mouthful of moldy bread in 2020 not even able to build a transport plane.
Yes it looks good this device but leaves a bitter taste.
CSeries, the best narrowbody aircraft ever built, is now owned by Airbus too.
Um we could use some jet fighters. Maybe we can convert this thing into a fighter plane. Would be better than the crappy old CF-18 s and second hand junk we bought off the Aussies.
''second hand junk we bought off the Aussies.''
Steady on.....old man......a steal.....''never used in combat....only flown to church on Sundays'''......pristine, new leather smell.....''junk''....you were lucky to get em.......:-)
@@SuperSetright We're lucky to have any planes at all in our piece of garbage air force. It's a joke Canada can't even defend itself. I've been a pilot since 1984 and have come across many ex-forces pilots and aircrew over the years. You don't even want to hear some of the horror stories. The whole irony of buying the Aussie jets is that the were upgraded here in Canada. Those F-18s were flown pretty hard by the Aussie pilots even if they didn't see any combat.
Poned subtitulos en español
ตัวทดสอบบินจากแคนาดามาเมืองไทยเลยเหรอมันจะต้องไม่แวะจอดที่ไหน
Thank the gods they didn't go to Boeing!
Mantap indo bisa bikin pesawat
Compro 500 unidades para a força aéria brasileira
Mirip CN235 Indonesia buatan alm. BJ. Habibie
Betul
Sama-sama kita dari Indonesia
buatnya bareng casa dulunya, karena casa merupakan salah satu konsorsium airbus, skrng mereka jadi bagian dari aibus
Great video of a great plane. I wish the Canadian FWSAR livery could have been updated with this new aircraft. It's SOO ugly. It's not even good 'retro'!
The livery isn't meant to be pretty. It's designed to help people easily and quickly identify the aircraft and its purpose. If you're lost in the woods or stranded in a boat way out on one of the great lakes or far from shore in the Atlantic or Pacific regions, you're not going to care about the livery of the aircraft that has been sent to rescue you. You'll notice that the rescue aircraft is big, it's yellow and help is on the way.
You are telling me that we can't build our own planes.we built the arrow for God's sake don't tell me that we can't
nope most of Canada's engineers and our infrastructure has been eroded since 1959
We still can and do our government just doesn’t buy them look at Viking air based in Victoria they have the rights to build all of DHC and bombardiers old stuff
Close to one million man hours to tweak an existing plane? Sounds like a load of man hours from other projects were shifted to this one.
Boeing spent that on the Max. Man hours on a computer add up. Even if you are checking emails from the wife.
Shit, we bought 56 of these? WTF. Why didn't we license build these? Or buy the V-22 Osprey instead and build out of the Bell Helicopter plant in Montreal? The Trudeau government is so fucking stupid.
Umm less range a V-22s ferry range is about 4130km the C-295s is 5728km smaller cargo bay V-22 19.57 cubic metres C-295 65cubic metres and at least 20millon dollars more expensive for the base airframe for the ability to do a vertical take off and landing which is redundant because we already have the CH-149
Nice aircraft for groomed runways but, what about the rest of Canada. Did we really have to outsource when we have a perfectly good manufacturing sector... oh sorry, we gave that away to the Airbus people!
ATR on steriods
I suppose this is PM Trudeaux’s ABA policy (anything but American). The C-130J is 100 mph faster, has twice the range and has a payload that is well over twice that of the C295. The C-130 has a track record of being rugged and reliable and can supply some of the most inhospitable places on the earth. Oh well, I guess you get what you pay for.
Canada already operates the C-130J. It's too large for this mission and can't get into the same strips as the C295 (or for that matter the DHC-5 Buffalo that the C295 replaces)
@@adam_mawz_maas We fly Casa's (USCG), but call it HC-144 Ocean Sentry. I think the version Canada is getting is better than ours. I crewed on HC130H's, we go way out in the ocean for SAR's and other searches. Casa has no where near the range of our C130. We landed our C130 on French Frigate Shoals. th-cam.com/video/kahvPpXWbKI/w-d-xo.html to evac people, never mind landing on an aircraft carrier. I am sure a C295 is more economical to use for some missions, which is why USCG has medium range SAR planes. But if you have to fly 1000+ miles out into the ocean and then conduct your search, you are not flying in a C295. The one in this vid is a really good looking and I am sure highly functional plane for the missions it was designed for. Also, Canada has P3's for long range.
mawzthefinn ;
We do use the C-130 even for SAR
We just bought 18 c130j s ,what planet are you from???
Sorry,,indo can't do it