Love watching your approaches into Paro I get some great references for my Msfs flight sim. Still have to use medium autobrake so my use of energy is not right yet.😊😊
Though I have to ask by where are you exactly aiming to stop? If with low brakes you are almost at the end of the runway, that is fine as that is standard procedure.
@@ZK-APA tried again with low autobrake and it was fine. I think I was pitching the nose up for the flare to much before and floating along the runway to far 😊
because you are not a professional pilot and most likely just a kid! and only fly PC games, these pros are dealing with REAL people and lives. AND by the way, while MSFS is great eye candy, the AC do not reflect or act like real AC.Thats where X-Plane shines! MSFS,HEY Its a game but a fun game for kids is all it is! LMFAO
Nice approach and video. I can't tell from the video if it's displaying the FMS "green doughnut" computed from the CF to the runway (and if you'd even be looking for that to assist you in the vertical profile). You earn your wages.
Its an RNP approach, but instead of ending at the runway threshold, it ends much before, from where is then flown as a visual approach (IE an RNP approach ending with a visual segment)
@@ZK-APA Yes, I know the RNP approaches with visual segment, but that's not what I see in this case. I saw many videos and compared with flight radar 24 and from what I see the pilots fly SUBSU, after TAKTI, after VOR of PARO (PRO) and then fly visual until landing. Currently (December 2022) there is no approach chart (IAC) that starts with TAKTI. Analyzing the charts, the procedures for both runways start via PR888 or PR777 and do not go through the VOR. Are procedure RNP 0.3 miles of maximum deviation! From what I understand the pilots are still using old charts or are not doing RNP as published. Compare recent flights on Flight Radar 24. Hugs.
@@rotaero Have a look at the official AIP charts of paro here www.doat.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/AD2_1-Aerodromes-VQPR.pdf PS Jeppeson is used as standard for pilots, but it is derived from the AIP chart ie the AIP chart is the official chart, from which jeppeson makes their charts. Hence AIP information supersedes jeppeson information if there is a difference.
We use Cloud Break Procedures using the VOR DME but never the RNP. You can access the above mentioned chart here. www.tropicairvirtual.com/company/twoballs/Carte/VQPR_CHARTS.pdf Hope it helps.
@@FlyingDragonPilot Hello sir, the chart you linked is pubblished in 1999 and only for CAT A & B aircraft, how is it allowed and possible for DrukAir to fly this old procedure, and why are the RNP AR procedures as you said, not in use? Thank you
Medium brakes here are not always required, especially considering the aircraft has to reach the end of the runway to initiate the backtrack. If medium brakes are used in such a situation, chances are you'll stop early, but then you'll have to then taxi ahead to the end of the runway, which adds an extra step.
It's absolutely not dangerous. Only Druk Air lands there with pilots with special trained skills. Standard procedures. Routine. Everything but not dangerous.
Now...that's a landing ! I'm impressed !
Ur fine
lt was beings very exciting landing to Paro, with DC10 & MD11 & Boeing 747-8
Very, very skilled pilots right there.
He makes it look so easy!
Best video I’ve ever seen!!!!
Thank you.
Fantastic pilot - as if it was a totally normal thing to land there!
Привет экипажу 👋👋 вид конечно шикарный. Ребята, хороших полётов 👍👍
Love watching your approaches into Paro I get some great references for my Msfs flight sim. Still have to use medium autobrake so my use of energy is not right yet.😊😊
Thank you. All the best!
i will try this landing to 😁
Though I have to ask by where are you exactly aiming to stop? If with low brakes you are almost at the end of the runway, that is fine as that is standard procedure.
@@ZK-APA tried again with low autobrake and it was fine. I think I was pitching the nose up for the flare to much before and floating along the runway to far 😊
@@christopheratkinson1690 I've noticed MSFS is very sensitive with pitching unless you've configured it.
The low final turn was interesting to watch.
Is the final turn much higher in rough conditions?
Wow! I flew this approach often in msfs2020, but never ended that good! Very nice :=)
because you are not a professional pilot and most likely just a kid! and only fly PC games, these pros are dealing with REAL people and lives. AND by the way, while MSFS is great eye candy, the AC do not reflect or act like real AC.Thats where X-Plane shines!
MSFS,HEY Its a game but a fun game for kids is all it is! LMFAO
@@lt4324 why angry?
@@lt4324 angry over a comment lmao
Reminds me of the approach to Innsbruck.
The good ones make it look easy
super landing 🤩😉👍
Captain is on top of his game.
Its in Bhutan where we can differentiate Pilots from Airplane Drivers. Cheero to the cockpit crew.
Perfect App and Ldg... Naise
Nice work capt
Outstanding job
This is amazing 👏 🙌
As always a soft landing in VQPR. Perfect 👏
Slick as a whistle.
great ! Good job ! 😍
Mejor imposible. Bravo
Wow he made it look really easy
NICELY DONE
Masterpiece !!!!
Wowwww.
Miss calculation and it's a long way back for go around... Very impressive
Nice approach and video. I can't tell from the video if it's displaying the FMS "green doughnut" computed from the CF to the runway (and if you'd even be looking for that to assist you in the vertical profile). You earn your wages.
there are no VOR charts to land on PARO I wonder, is this approach visual? Are RNAV RNP procedures not used in 2022?
Its an RNP approach, but instead of ending at the runway threshold, it ends much before, from where is then flown as a visual approach (IE an RNP approach ending with a visual segment)
@@ZK-APA
Yes, I know the RNP approaches with visual segment, but that's not what I see in this case. I saw many videos and compared with flight radar 24 and from what I see the pilots fly SUBSU, after TAKTI, after VOR of PARO (PRO) and then fly visual until landing. Currently (December 2022) there is no approach chart (IAC) that starts with TAKTI. Analyzing the charts, the procedures for both runways start via PR888 or PR777 and do not go through the VOR. Are procedure RNP 0.3 miles of maximum deviation! From what I understand the pilots are still using old charts or are not doing RNP as published. Compare recent flights on Flight Radar 24. Hugs.
@@rotaero Did you refer to jeppeson charts or the AIP charts?
@@ZK-APA Jeppesen, world standard.
@@rotaero Have a look at the official AIP charts of paro here
www.doat.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/AD2_1-Aerodromes-VQPR.pdf
PS Jeppeson is used as standard for pilots, but it is derived from the AIP chart ie the AIP chart is the official chart, from which jeppeson makes their charts. Hence AIP information supersedes jeppeson information if there is a difference.
Is it the airport that's dangerous, or is it the approach?
On point 👍
It is unfortunate that the 360 degree turn, which is one of the biggest attractions, has been deleted.
You hear the 200 above call out and he’s nowhere near being aligned with the runway. That’s simply amazing.
brutal 💪
Bravo.
Аwesome!
Bravo
帕罗机场为什么非要从北边降落，从南边进场没有这么大难度。
Genios
in ms fs my turbo prop always hit the trees
Dear sir may I know in what circumstances would the Bhutanese pilots use the RNAV(RNP) cloud-break procedures? Or not used at all?
We use Cloud Break Procedures using the VOR DME but never the RNP.
You can access the above mentioned chart here.
www.tropicairvirtual.com/company/twoballs/Carte/VQPR_CHARTS.pdf
Hope it helps.
Thank you very much sir, so it is quite interesting for the reason of developing the RNP procedures in Bhutan AIP
@@FlyingDragonPilot Hello sir, the chart you linked is pubblished in 1999 and only for CAT A & B aircraft, how is it allowed and possible for DrukAir to fly this old procedure, and why are the RNP AR procedures as you said, not in use? Thank you
🙏👌
damm cap you rock
I imagine the people seeing the airplane below 200 ft lending
A very interesting approach and landing. Why would they build an airport in such a mountainous area?
Because there is not anything better option in that radius, this was the only option.
at 1:36 co-pilot was praying xD
Compétence
這是真的？還是假的？還有那兩個是小孩嗎？
But not as dangerous as in the msfs2020 ahaha. I always crash the aircraft, no way to do a smooth and perfect landing as the real you did. Congrats!!!
Most Dangerous Airport on the globe, selects min Autobrake like a boss 😎
Medium brakes here are not always required, especially considering the aircraft has to reach the end of the runway to initiate the backtrack.
If medium brakes are used in such a situation, chances are you'll stop early, but then you'll have to then taxi ahead to the end of the runway, which adds an extra step.
Isn’t it Lukla?
Jeez
The thumbnail look like Sam chui lol
Oh nvm is real
What a ridiculous place to build an airport!!?
Welcome to the Himalayas.
In Himalayas there is not a lot of option. :D
no foqa..not difficult
Охренеть.
Most dangerous ? No trafic, alone in the circuit, some turns here and there, a little high elevation maybe. Like a Disney cartoon : That's all folks !
doesn't look that bad
It's absolutely not dangerous. Only Druk Air lands there with pilots with special trained skills. Standard procedures. Routine. Everything but not dangerous.
Everything on TH-cam is the most dangerous!!! Ahahahhahahahahah!!!! Greetings TRE A321NEO. This video is for kids