The reason why legacy changes when on independent is because what legacy is essentially doing is increasing your sens when you ads in to match what your hip fire sens is. When you’re on independent and ads in it zooms in to what ads on 80 fov is. So what legacy is doing is increasing your sens up to what your hip fire would be on 80 fov rather than to 120 or whatever you’re using. You can test this by putting your fov on 80 independent and you’ll see they match up 1:1 like when you’re on affected 👍
Personal experience: changed to 1.78 because of my screen dimensions (internet told me to divide my resolution). Never felt locked in. Always felt off. A month later I changed it to 1 after watching Faze Nios settings. My sniping and overall aim has never felt so “point and shoot” before. Way more locked in feeling. Will try 1.33 after a month of 1 and will be back. PS: test 1 coefficient Newt, Nio one of the best snipers in the game rocks it. PS PS: I’m new to the mnk scene after a lifetime of playing control. Your videos helped ease this journey so thank you Newt. Stay up my friend.
lowering my FOV to 90 and using relative 1 with inepedentant works well. Iv'e realised you dont really need 120, 90 helps you see eneymies much easier and lets just say im winning way more 1 on 1 battles. so im happy.
ayo a year later, any update on if it really helped overall? pros tend to just use something, if it feels good they keep using it and dont usually do too much research past that in games, thats why theyre pros and not dorks like me on the internet thinking if i find some hidden secret setting to make my aim god tier ill be goated
I’ve messed around with all of these and I find myself most consistent with 0 at affected. If you’re an arm aimer with a low sense I think it’s best cause you can be super precise, kinda has the feel that a lot of the top Warzone streamers have like Sym where they lower their ads settings. If you’re more of a wrist player then then it’s not as great cause you’re probably gonna be behind on tracking targets
Also for example if you used a VLK scope you probably wouldn’t even get nearly as much of a 360 as you did with the red dot. Kinda makes sense though cause if you’re using more of a scope you would want a slower sense to make the minor adjustments
@@callangaffney3123 all i needed to hear thanks guys, gona try 0 i was rocking 1.33 was great then today switched to 1.78 my tracking was a bit better but sisnt try 0 yet
Good info 👍👍👍somehow it doesn't work the same in Warzone 2.0.. the closest to a full turn while ADS in Warzone 2.0 is: if you put it to relative and you ramp up the coeficient to max 5.0
"Is it 1:1" isnt a question. Your ads 360 will be different for every gun and optic because they all zoom to a different fov. Pistols, smgs, and ars all have a different 360 distance no matter what coeffecient you use. You wouldn't want your sniper scope to do a 360 the same distance as your gi mini. The holographic would be different than the gi because it zooms in more. Smg iron sights dont zoom as much as ar irons. Your sensitivty doesnt change when you ads, the 360 distance changes because your fov is tighter. Trying to match the 360 distance scales up the velocity of the reticle, so it feels the same but the cursor actualy moves faster than your hip to try to match the hip 360 of the old fov with the new fov. If you bump your fov way down in the settings and keep your same sens, then doing a hip 360 will feel way slower because you're seeing less of the screen, but your sensitivity is still the same. It works the same way when your fov lowers when aiming. Thats why your sniper scope doesn't "feel" as sensitive as your hip. Using a sniper scope is like dropping your fov suppperrr low 0 coeficcient makes your flicks based on 2d distance from the reticle to the target, and your screen resolution doesn't matter because its basing it off the center of the screen. So if you had a 1x zoom optic and are standing 100 meters back from 2 targets, then it will take say 4 inches for you to flick between each target. If you move up 50 meters, then it would take 2 inches for each flick. So now if you put on a 2x optic and move back to 100m away, it will take 2 inches again. Its as if you physically moved 2 times closer (50 meters away) using a 1x optic. If you moved 200 meters away with the 2x, then it would take 4 inches to flick between them. The same as if you moved 2 times closer with the 1x Using 1.33 or 1.78 scales up the velocity if the cursor to make it "feel" like its closer to your hip, and it feels different for different resolutions. every gun and optic will have a different sensitivity. Using legacy or 0 (theyre the same thing) keeps your sensitivity the same no matter what fov you use (or how much zoom your gun has) or what resolution your monitor is, so i think legacy is the best
This is great bruh this helped me on battlefield too believe it or not. Ive fiddled around with mine for the past few hours and put mine around 50%. Just feels right with my current settings.
For a 1920x1080 monitor your coefficient for 1:1 is 1.78 A 1.33 coefficient is equivalent to a 4:3 monitor's mouse movement on a 1920x1080 monitor. Legacy is a shortcut to the 1:1 regardless of your monitor.
@@Dizzeke He's doing a 360 bruh. Your monitor distance say 1920x1080 is horizontal and vertical left to right up and down not 3d. Makes sense??? No difference in aiming which alot don't explain your mouse movent is horizontal and vertical. How far you move your mouse is the location of the center of your screen it wouldn't change. Thats how muscle memory is built. Hope that helps lol
@Mason Norris 1.78 is just rounded from the reminder of 1.77 1920/1080 . Id recommend 1.78 but if you want 1:1 ratio where your hip fire is the same as ads chose legacy or 0 monitor coieffent
Bro. This is the video everyone needed. I use 1.33 because it just feels like Call of Duty. My brain is used to the aim slowdown. CS:GO isn't 1:1 either. I honestly don't know where the idea came from that 1:1 is ideal, because as your vision focuses further away, your brain is narrowing your field of view more. I don't believe in the whole, using the same sens for every game. For one, the way sensitivity is affected on different weapons is what gives games a unique feel, and is usually tuned to the way the game is played. I match my sensitivity to what I want to be able to do in a game, what ranges I want to be most effective at, the types of angles I need to gain information from, and what my eyes feel comfortable seeing. It feels weird to walk like you do in CS with your camera whizzing around hella fast. And the whole game is funnel points. There is little need to ever cover multiple angles. On the other hand, really low sensitivity feels weird to rocket jump and track players all around you in a massive arena in Quake. I think Call of Duty falls in between all of this. 40-50cm/360 seems to be the sweet spot for the way the game is played. There are plenty of funnel points, cover, lines of sight, but they can be spaced out, and as many angles as you have covered, just as many have you covered. You need to be able to gain info quickly and often, and react quickly to the unexpected and take cover in a pinch. And you run like Usain Bolt on steroids. But, the game is still mostly horizontal, and the time to kill is fast, and there can be significant downtime between gunfights, so consistency and first shot accuracy is important to balance with the movement.
1.33 changes the sens to replicate a 4:3 aspect ratio which will be 1920x1440 and 1.78 will be a 16:9 aspect ratio which will be a 1920x1080 resolution. thats why the horizontal sens its the same for 1.33 and 1.78; because the horizontal resolution in 4:3 and 16:9 is the same. But the VERTICAL sensitivity its different. on 1.78 the vertical and horizontal sens is the same, while in 1.33 the vertical sens is slighlty higher when aiming in
Switched to 2.33 on 21:9 monitor and helped me a LOT in close range fights. Also seems to have helped with tracking at range but it's def going to throw off my snipe flicks for a while. I was at 1.33 forever tho and I kept under shooting snipes sometimes. Who knows I might end up putting it back lol. I should prob figure out what the medium is since I ran 1.33 for so long on 16:9 lol.
@@H7AEE depends what you like. Definitely increases your horizontal sensitivity obviously. I run low sens so it wasn't a huge change. Way more annoying having different sensitivity vertical to horizontal.
I think of the monitor coefficient as like an ads sensitivity slider. I think 1.78 feels too sensitive and sort of floaty and 0 feels too sluggish so I play on 1.
1.33 is the equivalent of playing on 4:3 aspect ratio or 1920x1440 and what is guy doesn't mention at all is coefficient is in relation to your vertical sensitivity. So at 1.33 your vertical sensitivity (up and down) is 25% faster than horizontal. At 1.78 your horizontal speeds up slightly to match your vertical so they're the same. All of this is if you're playing at 1920x1080 16:9.
They should've given you the option to change sensitivities across all different zooms - SMGS, ARs and pistols all have a different FOV and because of it a little different sensitivity on relative, also sights like Holo, 3x, red dot... This is very inconsistent, even though it's not that noticeable. Instead of just having High Zoom and Low Zoom multipliers they should've given the multipliers for every single different zoom in the game, that way you can match correctly all the iron sight zooms, lower zoom optics and higher zoom optics.
Another excellent video. What FOV do you use and do you use independent or affected? I noticed in the video you had it on 120 affected. Do you also use this in multiplayer and cold war? Thank you.
My EDPI is 24,000 lol , my chair ,its hand rest and the table are set up in a way that i would not be able to arm aiming with ease . So m forced to use wrist aiming. Snapping is really easy but tracking can be hard at times due to the high sense. Do you think its worth to change the whole setup of table n chair for me to start practising with arm aiming
Not that it matters now but for future reference it would just be 16 divided by 10. 16:9 is 1.78 since 16 ÷ 9 is 1.77777 ect. That is just for horizontal and vertical movements to be equal. Using the 4:3 equiv of 1.33 leads to a 25% faster vertical speed.
@@RavenousSix haha funny how things work out. In general dont worry about the "correct" values as none of them are exactly right anyway. All they do is make movements either actually one to one or feel like one to one for a specific area of the screen. Tbh the thing that makes most sense is to use 1.78 for the equal horizontal and vertical value. (For you on 16:10 res whatever 1.6) and then just adjust the ads sensitivity slider if you want it faster or slower. Using 1.33 makes no sense unless you want the faster vertical speed and using 0 is essentially just people using an easy to remember/input value for a slower/lower multipliers ads scaling curve. You would probably get very similar ads sensitivity values using 0.7 ads sens with the 1.78 16:9 ratio coefficient. If you have any questions after youve played around with stuff i will do my best to answer.
@@N1TRO I setup the 1.6 co-efficient and it feels so beast now, really improved my stats. I'm always top 1-3 on team and with this change I'm like top 1 always.
I think using a 1 monitor coefficient is best. Your brain builds muscle memory mostly based on the distance and not the rotational angle, so if you want to keep things consistent 1 is the best bc it will be the same mouse movement to move from one side of the screen to the other for both ads and hipfire
It's really weird that legacy doesn't always give you a 1:1 sensitivity. I thought what legacy does was for every pixel your mouse moved, it would always rotate your character by some same angle. In that sense, it really shouldn't be affected by the FOV at all.
Legacy (or relative @ 0) is what the older CODs used and is focal length scaling, that is technically the correct way to scale. If you want 1:1 across all zoom levels use 1.78 MDC if you’re on 16:9 aspect ratio.
It should be same, because they both uses same game engine. Though, I find sometimes that it's not even and it really messes me up. Same goes with Vanguard game, they should be same but it doesn't feel like it.
Hello, if anyone plays pubg on pc I'm trying to get the same type of sensitivity that modern warfare gives us; relative at 1.78. I have universal sensitivity for all scopes enabled in pubg settings, so every scope from 1-15x scopes should be the same but it's way to slow for me, is there some type of converter?
If you keep the default value of 1.33 YOUR HORIZONTAL SENS IS SLOWER THAN YOUR VERTICAL SENS Defaulting on 1.33 means your horizontal sens is not matching your vertical sens if you use 1920x1080 res Aspect Ratio in regards to Monitor Distance Coefficient value 4:3 = 1.33 16:9 (1920x1080) = 1.777778 21:9 (2560x1080) = 2.33 Divide your monitors width ÷ height to get the proper coefficient , (1920 ÷ 1080 = 1.77777777778) Hope this helps!!
This is true but the way monitor coefficient 1.78 works is it calculates from the edge of your screen not the middle so this is why i say 0 is the best
Well it’s all relative (pun intended) for a lot of people that play FPS shooters and been around on pc for a years will be familiar with relative at 0 which legacy was supposed to be but it ended up broken as it doesn’t scale with fov like relative at 0 does , it’s as if ur sensitivity was on 80 fov, why do you think when you change ur field of view ur sensitivity feels different even though it’s the same 360 distance, it all comes down to focal length a scaling ,when you make a video like this you should really look up the science of it, understand the concept of how it all works, so if u want same 360 distance yeh go ahead use legacy at affected but that doesn’t mean that it will work for all of you, a lot of people think they want same 360 or what they call 1 to 1 sensitivity but what they’re really looking for is the same feel which 1.33 or 1.78 can provide and a lot of people are ok with that but if your the type of person to struggle using legacy because it doesn’t feel natural which I know for a lot of you it doesn’t, u may say u want it but what u want is to be comfortable with ur send and decide what works best for you by experementing I’ve done extensive research and extreme testing on Relatvie and legacy and how ur fov affects the scaling and I switch between them to whatever I feel like using , not saying you should keep switching but find what is natural and feels good to you , only way to get good
Hey Troll...I mean Don of Gambinos, every other video out there explains the concept and the math (which you ironically call science) behind it, but they do not show such a practical application. This is exactly what most people are looking for. We need to see what it looks like, which is why this video is perfect. We care as much about the “science” behind this concept as we do about your pretentious, deigning comment - which is not at all. Also, you should learn how to use periods...or any punctuation at all correctly. I’m sure there’s a science book out there on proper grammar you could read.
dependes on what you call 1 to 1. legacy gives you the same cm/360 but relative gives you the same focal length which is the same distance the crosshair moves on the monitor per mouse movement
I was thinking it's better to use legacy so for kovaaks my practice would translate over. Ur basically saying it doesnt matter if I use relative or legacy if I'm using kovaaks to practice in?
@@ManuCapone_ mouse control translate over anyways, I use relative because I feel like monitor distance is more important but don't overthink it. You can get used to sensitivities very fast. If u want the same cm/360 and monitor distance the fov for AR low zoom effective on 120 fov is 97 and smg 110. If you ask me, just use relative.
@@orrlicht3718 so you use relative at 1.33 and then AR zoom affected at 97 and SMG 110? I’m using 2560x1440 monitor. Just trying to figure out how to have zoom feel same as hipfire for everything
@@zmachine1690 I use sens randomiser in kovaak haha. I don't believe in long term muscle memory, I think its more abt mouse control so I use slow sens to develop large angle movements and high for smoothness and acc. There must be a video abt it, and there are FOV sens calculators that make sens feel the same in different fovs
1920 / 1080 = 1.777778. 800 / 600 = 1.33333 It’s all about the resolution u play. (+ sens on top. ) But all those values are found by dividing screen resolutions.
this video is completely wrong,since it ignores what coeff does. ,the reticle moves with different speed near the center of the screen or the edge of the screen depending the values.sure the overall mouse distance travel for a 360 is specific ,but the sense is different while near the center of a screen or the edge,that is why 0 is for tracking(sense is scaled closer to hip while near the reticle),1.33 for close flicks(sense is scaled a little further than the reticle to match hip) and 1.78 for long flicks because it basically lets you have higher sense near the reticle but is decreased when near the edge of the screen. in fewer words....coeff isnt for same 360 but for analog matching hip/ads at certain distances from the center of the screen. cool vid but wrong and pointless
Just lmao 1.33 is the equivalent of playing on 4:3 aspect ratio 1920x1440, 1.78 is 16:9 1920x1080 and what is guy doesn't mention at all is coefficient is in relation to your vertical sensitivity. So at 1.33 your vertical sensitivity (up and down) is 25% faster than horizontal. At 1.78 your horizontal speeds up slightly to match your vertical so they're the same. All of this is if you're playing at 1920x1080 16:9.
I’ve seen every video on this subject and yours was the only one that stopped me from searching for more. Good job.
Yes i second this thanks man great effort and good explanation
I would agree with that, this guy is the only one who knows what the difference between relative and legacy! Wasted so much time searching
Agreed
entiendo poco ingles, pero estoy deacuerdo
I know a lot of people have been waiting for this. I like how you listen to the fans dawg.
Next will be bocw 😁
This changed my whole gameplay going legacy and affected. I’m actually good now haha
You just stopped all the mess i've been through, thanks
I messed a little bit with the ads multipier and now i have it on 0.9 and it helps alot. Great video man
Best explanation ive seen for this topic! Good job man. 💯
Thank you!
The reason why legacy changes when on independent is because what legacy is essentially doing is increasing your sens when you ads in to match what your hip fire sens is. When you’re on independent and ads in it zooms in to what ads on 80 fov is. So what legacy is doing is increasing your sens up to what your hip fire would be on 80 fov rather than to 120 or whatever you’re using. You can test this by putting your fov on 80 independent and you’ll see they match up 1:1 like when you’re on affected 👍
true, which is why is best to use affected if you are using higher than 80FOV.
Personal experience: changed to 1.78 because of my screen dimensions (internet told me to divide my resolution). Never felt locked in. Always felt off. A month later I changed it to 1 after watching Faze Nios settings. My sniping and overall aim has never felt so “point and shoot” before. Way more locked in feeling. Will try 1.33 after a month of 1 and will be back. PS: test 1 coefficient Newt, Nio one of the best snipers in the game rocks it. PS PS: I’m new to the mnk scene after a lifetime of playing control. Your videos helped ease this journey so thank you Newt. Stay up my friend.
lowering my FOV to 90 and using relative 1 with inepedentant works well. Iv'e realised you dont really need 120, 90 helps you see eneymies much easier and lets just say im winning way more 1 on 1 battles. so im happy.
@@TrumpWinner till u face a sweat close range and u cant see him
Faze Nio - Cheating in Warzone - ESP walls and Radar & Aimbot
th-cam.com/video/cBJSr1rHEUI/w-d-xo.html
ayo a year later, any update on if it really helped overall? pros tend to just use something, if it feels good they keep using it and dont usually do too much research past that in games, thats why theyre pros and not dorks like me on the internet thinking if i find some hidden secret setting to make my aim god tier ill be goated
@@Dizzeke Use what you find comfortable, only thing I learned lmao
I’ve messed around with all of these and I find myself most consistent with 0 at affected. If you’re an arm aimer with a low sense I think it’s best cause you can be super precise, kinda has the feel that a lot of the top Warzone streamers have like Sym where they lower their ads settings. If you’re more of a wrist player then then it’s not as great cause you’re probably gonna be behind on tracking targets
Also for example if you used a VLK scope you probably wouldn’t even get nearly as much of a 360 as you did with the red dot. Kinda makes sense though cause if you’re using more of a scope you would want a slower sense to make the minor adjustments
@@Sports4me7 do u play relative or legacy
@@devonted relative
Couldn't agree more, relative at 0 Co Efficient is great for arm aim, has the ability to be super precise and it feels great !
@@callangaffney3123 all i needed to hear thanks guys, gona try 0 i was rocking 1.33 was great then today switched to 1.78 my tracking was a bit better but sisnt try 0 yet
Good info 👍👍👍somehow it doesn't work the same in Warzone 2.0.. the closest to a full turn while ADS in Warzone 2.0 is: if you put it to relative and you ramp up the coeficient to max 5.0
"Is it 1:1" isnt a question. Your ads 360 will be different for every gun and optic because they all zoom to a different fov. Pistols, smgs, and ars all have a different 360 distance no matter what coeffecient you use. You wouldn't want your sniper scope to do a 360 the same distance as your gi mini. The holographic would be different than the gi because it zooms in more. Smg iron sights dont zoom as much as ar irons. Your sensitivty doesnt change when you ads, the 360 distance changes because your fov is tighter. Trying to match the 360 distance scales up the velocity of the reticle, so it feels the same but the cursor actualy moves faster than your hip to try to match the hip 360 of the old fov with the new fov. If you bump your fov way down in the settings and keep your same sens, then doing a hip 360 will feel way slower because you're seeing less of the screen, but your sensitivity is still the same. It works the same way when your fov lowers when aiming. Thats why your sniper scope doesn't "feel" as sensitive as your hip. Using a sniper scope is like dropping your fov suppperrr low
0 coeficcient makes your flicks based on 2d distance from the reticle to the target, and your screen resolution doesn't matter because its basing it off the center of the screen. So if you had a 1x zoom optic and are standing 100 meters back from 2 targets, then it will take say 4 inches for you to flick between each target. If you move up 50 meters, then it would take 2 inches for each flick. So now if you put on a 2x optic and move back to 100m away, it will take 2 inches again. Its as if you physically moved 2 times closer (50 meters away) using a 1x optic. If you moved 200 meters away with the 2x, then it would take 4 inches to flick between them. The same as if you moved 2 times closer with the 1x
Using 1.33 or 1.78 scales up the velocity if the cursor to make it "feel" like its closer to your hip, and it feels different for different resolutions. every gun and optic will have a different sensitivity. Using legacy or 0 (theyre the same thing) keeps your sensitivity the same no matter what fov you use (or how much zoom your gun has) or what resolution your monitor is, so i think legacy is the best
Great post.
Actually legacy is weird as you can see at 1:20. I'd just set it on relative 0% to make sure it's fine
Legacy is broken but if it feels good to you by all means but doesn’t work for everyone
@@BramContracting i actualy use 0 coefficient, but they feel the same to me
@@kalebward4029 what fov do you play at
This is the most helpful youtube comment I've ever read. Congratulations on breaking out of the cesspool.
This is great bruh this helped me on battlefield too believe it or not. Ive fiddled around with mine for the past few hours and put mine around 50%. Just feels right with my current settings.
I play in 1.51 not enough videos explaining what it means but works for me
Explain bro
Cheers for the help bro much love from New Zealand 🇳🇿
Such a damn good video think you for this im now gonna be playing on legacy affected.
For a 1920x1080 monitor your coefficient for 1:1 is 1.78
A 1.33 coefficient is equivalent to a 4:3 monitor's mouse movement on a 1920x1080 monitor.
Legacy is a shortcut to the 1:1 regardless of your monitor.
he just did a whole video demonstrating that the coefficient at 1.78 isnt 1:1
@@Dizzeke He's doing a 360 bruh. Your monitor distance say 1920x1080 is horizontal and vertical left to right up and down not 3d. Makes sense???
No difference in aiming which alot don't explain your mouse movent is horizontal and vertical. How far you move your mouse is the location of the center of your screen it wouldn't change. Thats how muscle memory is built. Hope that helps lol
@Mason Norris 1.78 is just rounded from the reminder of 1.77 1920/1080 . Id recommend 1.78 but if you want 1:1 ratio where your hip fire is the same as ads chose legacy or 0 monitor coieffent
@Mason Norris monitor coieffent only effects ADS aiming it slows it down. if you play on high sensitivity I wouldn't recommend a 1:1 hip fire ratio
What are you using to simulate the mouse 360 movement? Did you just record a macro on your mouse software?
Most detailed video I’ve seen. I prefer 1.33 and I shred with it nice and thanks :)
Thanks for explaining this it helps, subbed
Bro. This is the video everyone needed. I use 1.33 because it just feels like Call of Duty. My brain is used to the aim slowdown. CS:GO isn't 1:1 either. I honestly don't know where the idea came from that 1:1 is ideal, because as your vision focuses further away, your brain is narrowing your field of view more. I don't believe in the whole, using the same sens for every game. For one, the way sensitivity is affected on different weapons is what gives games a unique feel, and is usually tuned to the way the game is played. I match my sensitivity to what I want to be able to do in a game, what ranges I want to be most effective at, the types of angles I need to gain information from, and what my eyes feel comfortable seeing. It feels weird to walk like you do in CS with your camera whizzing around hella fast. And the whole game is funnel points. There is little need to ever cover multiple angles. On the other hand, really low sensitivity feels weird to rocket jump and track players all around you in a massive arena in Quake. I think Call of Duty falls in between all of this. 40-50cm/360 seems to be the sweet spot for the way the game is played. There are plenty of funnel points, cover, lines of sight, but they can be spaced out, and as many angles as you have covered, just as many have you covered. You need to be able to gain info quickly and often, and react quickly to the unexpected and take cover in a pinch. And you run like Usain Bolt on steroids. But, the game is still mostly horizontal, and the time to kill is fast, and there can be significant downtime between gunfights, so consistency and first shot accuracy is important to balance with the movement.
1.33 changes the sens to replicate a 4:3 aspect ratio which will be 1920x1440 and 1.78 will be a 16:9 aspect ratio which will be a 1920x1080 resolution. thats why the horizontal sens its the same for 1.33 and 1.78; because the horizontal resolution in 4:3 and 16:9 is the same. But the VERTICAL sensitivity its different. on 1.78 the vertical and horizontal sens is the same, while in 1.33 the vertical sens is slighlty higher when aiming in
Switched to 2.33 on 21:9 monitor and helped me a LOT in close range fights. Also seems to have helped with tracking at range but it's def going to throw off my snipe flicks for a while. I was at 1.33 forever tho and I kept under shooting snipes sometimes. Who knows I might end up putting it back lol. I should prob figure out what the medium is since I ran 1.33 for so long on 16:9 lol.
Holy... bro I tried it and its insane 😶😶
@@H7AEE depends what you like. Definitely increases your horizontal sensitivity obviously. I run low sens so it wasn't a huge change. Way more annoying having different sensitivity vertical to horizontal.
Yup it helps so much
what mouse sensitivity and dpi youre using for ultrawide monitor? can you also share your ingame mouse settings i have the same monitor as you
I think of the monitor coefficient as like an ads sensitivity slider. I think 1.78 feels too sensitive and sort of floaty and 0 feels too sluggish so I play on 1.
1.33 is the equivalent of playing on 4:3 aspect ratio or 1920x1440 and what is guy doesn't mention at all is coefficient is in relation to your vertical sensitivity.
So at 1.33 your vertical sensitivity (up and down) is 25% faster than horizontal. At 1.78 your horizontal speeds up slightly to match your vertical so they're the same. All of this is if you're playing at 1920x1080 16:9.
@@Serefth did u test it?
@@Serefth Is "Legacy" the same vertical as horizontal speed?
hey great video man! very well explained . I subbed
How do you do the spin without moving the mouse
Through the program
@@TheDryerNewt is there a download for it?
@@nosleep8412 you figure it out?
@@connorcalderone no
think he used this www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
best video on the topic in whole TH-cam hands down
Legend, Thanks for this explanation video, the best out there! TRUE EXAMPLES TRUE DATA! thank you!
Thanks for the vid. It helped me so much.
What are you using to do that 360
Thanks so much for this brother, Legacy and affected for me, I was wondering why my aim felt so off.
With what key do you turn the camera so it turns 360 degrees? I am very interested in knowing
key to rotate 360 degrees in a game
check out this link www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
it's the same program he used in the video
How do you create that thing with alt+backspace to rotate a constant value ?
Software
what monitor have you been using
well fricken done, thank you!!
What name Program for 360
Thanks for this. Would you do a test using something like a sniper with a much higher zoom?
Waittttt alt backspace???? What hot key section do I assign this ???
They should've given you the option to change sensitivities across all different zooms - SMGS, ARs and pistols all have a different FOV and because of it a little different sensitivity on relative, also sights like Holo, 3x, red dot... This is very inconsistent, even though it's not that noticeable. Instead of just having High Zoom and Low Zoom multipliers they should've given the multipliers for every single different zoom in the game, that way you can match correctly all the iron sight zooms, lower zoom optics and higher zoom optics.
They did it 👍🏻
How you can do 360 on keyboards ???
you figure it out?
Kovaaks sensitivity matcher www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
Another excellent video. What FOV do you use and do you use independent or affected? I noticed in the video you had it on 120 affected. Do you also use this in multiplayer and cold war? Thank you.
This is the best explanation I've seen by the way. Do you use legacy or relative?
I use 1.78 and effected fov at 120 😁
@@tinktwiceman ?
Best video on the subject
What about for like a 42inch TV?
what apps for using that alt + backspace for 360 ?
How you setup the 360 on Deadspace ?
How do u do alt-backspace? Not working for me.
How tf do u do that atl backspace mine dosnt do that
I've been looking this, actual evidence. But for me legacy feels "floaty" as relative feels more precise. So I guess I'm not getting what I wanted.
This helps alot ✌
If I use legacy in default ads sens affected no matter what my is I will get 1:1 ?
My EDPI is 24,000 lol , my chair ,its hand rest and the table are set up in a way that i would not be able to arm aiming with ease . So m forced to use wrist aiming. Snapping is really easy but tracking can be hard at times due to the high sense. Do you think its worth to change the whole setup of table n chair for me to start practising with arm aiming
how do you perform a 360 for the test?
Yoh download the program and look at the binds they have in the folder and do a 360
@@TheDryerNewt what program though, Lol?
@@curtisaknopp Have you figured out the program?
@@connorcalderone no, sorry, I have not.
@@curtisaknopp i dont understand why he wont tell us man :|
WTF was that alt backspace 360 bro?
Saludos!
¿Cuál es el "coeficiente de distancia de monitor" de juegos como PUBG en los que no se puede configurar ese valor?
Is this only for modern warfare or warzone too. (Legacy).
Thanks bro!
Can u do this for Cold War or is it the same
Wait…alt + backspace??
How will this thing work on 32:9?
1:1 sensitivity independent 120 FOV?
Super helpful. Thanks dude
This is a good one. Thanks.
Amazing video
Can I use these settings for 4K monitor 27 inch ?
Nice I appreciate the explanation. Going to legacy, because I'm on 16:10 and can't even figure out my coefficient anyway.
Not that it matters now but for future reference it would just be 16 divided by 10. 16:9 is 1.78 since 16 ÷ 9 is 1.77777 ect. That is just for horizontal and vertical movements to be equal. Using the 4:3 equiv of 1.33 leads to a 25% faster vertical speed.
@@N1TRO Man what are the chances. I was looking into figuring this out just now and you come in 7 months later with the clutch response, LMAO. Thanks.
@@RavenousSix haha funny how things work out. In general dont worry about the "correct" values as none of them are exactly right anyway. All they do is make movements either actually one to one or feel like one to one for a specific area of the screen. Tbh the thing that makes most sense is to use 1.78 for the equal horizontal and vertical value. (For you on 16:10 res whatever 1.6) and then just adjust the ads sensitivity slider if you want it faster or slower. Using 1.33 makes no sense unless you want the faster vertical speed and using 0 is essentially just people using an easy to remember/input value for a slower/lower multipliers ads scaling curve. You would probably get very similar ads sensitivity values using 0.7 ads sens with the 1.78 16:9 ratio coefficient.
If you have any questions after youve played around with stuff i will do my best to answer.
@@N1TRO I setup the 1.6 co-efficient and it feels so beast now, really improved my stats. I'm always top 1-3 on team and with this change I'm like top 1 always.
@@RavenousSix glad to hear
How can you make the perfect 360 degree? It is a program? Thanks
Macro
How do u do that 360°?
you figure it out?
He used Kovaaks sensitivity matcher in the video www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
interesting.. cool video topic,
I think using a 1 monitor coefficient is best. Your brain builds muscle memory mostly based on the distance and not the rotational angle, so if you want to keep things consistent 1 is the best bc it will be the same mouse movement to move from one side of the screen to the other for both ads and hipfire
No, you coefficient should be based on your aspect ratio
bro if I play on 2k, what should I use to get it closer to 1:1
WHAT IS YOUR INGAME SENS?
It's really weird that legacy doesn't always give you a 1:1 sensitivity. I thought what legacy does was for every pixel your mouse moved, it would always rotate your character by some same angle. In that sense, it really shouldn't be affected by the FOV at all.
Legacy (or relative @ 0) is what the older CODs used and is focal length scaling, that is technically the correct way to scale. If you want 1:1 across all zoom levels use 1.78 MDC if you’re on 16:9 aspect ratio.
Affected and legacy is the best i'm wrong ?
Your right
How are you turning around like that? Can this be used to setup a perfect 180?
Perfect 360 and its the program
TheDryerNewt what program ?
@@Mazen-zr1xw he used the Kovaak sensitivty matcher www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
what is your sensitivity matcher called or give me the link pls
It's called Kovaaks sensitivity matcher www.kovaak.com/sensitivity-matcher/
how to do 360 with keys?
this thing that makes you 360 could make you 360 no scope. hopefully im wrong cus this could be a kind of cheat
If you managed to 360 no scope while doing this you are a god, you have press alt and z i believe while doing trying to aim would be ridiciculous
@@MikeyBoomB0tz very true
Great video bro. So I'm assuming if you use kovaaks and you want kovaaks to be 1 to 1 with warzone, it's best to use legacy? With affected fov
Yes and thanks brutha
@@TheDryerNewt np bro. and if u look at the description it shows for legacy in warzone, its completely wrong lol. they need to fix it
Bro what is the best DPI for warzone 2. Thanks for the great video
hey newt what ur creator code?
Dont have one 😪😭
If I play 50.00 in game sense on MW can someone tell me what the conversion would be to Cold War sense? I play 800 DPI as well.
It should be same, because they both uses same game engine. Though, I find sometimes that it's not even and it really messes me up. Same goes with Vanguard game, they should be same but it doesn't feel like it.
🔥
I'm running 1440p what should I use? But I'm asking this a minute into the video, I'm gonna watch it all, I'll probably get my answer
1440p is the same ratio of 16:9 as 1080p, so it works the same.
Hello, if anyone plays pubg on pc I'm trying to get the same type of sensitivity that modern warfare gives us; relative at 1.78. I have universal sensitivity for all scopes enabled in pubg settings, so every scope from 1-15x scopes should be the same but it's way to slow for me, is there some type of converter?
Thanks so much. Can't wait to clap and not tell any of my friends how I became godly overnight
If you keep the default value of 1.33 YOUR HORIZONTAL SENS IS SLOWER THAN YOUR VERTICAL SENS
Defaulting on 1.33 means your horizontal sens is not matching your vertical sens if you use 1920x1080 res
Aspect Ratio in regards to Monitor Distance Coefficient value
4:3 = 1.33
16:9 (1920x1080) = 1.777778
21:9 (2560x1080) = 2.33
Divide your monitors width ÷ height to get the proper coefficient , (1920 ÷ 1080 = 1.77777777778)
Hope this helps!!
This is true but the way monitor coefficient 1.78 works is it calculates from the edge of your screen not the middle so this is why i say 0 is the best
@@TheDryerNewt interesting. With that in mind i just may have to try 0 and affected
Well it’s all relative (pun intended) for a lot of people that play FPS shooters and been around on pc for a years will be familiar with relative at 0 which legacy was supposed to be but it ended up broken as it doesn’t scale with fov like relative at 0 does , it’s as if ur sensitivity was on 80 fov, why do you think when you change ur field of view ur sensitivity feels different even though it’s the same 360 distance, it all comes down to focal length a scaling ,when you make a video like this you should really look up the science of it, understand the concept of how it all works, so if u want same 360 distance yeh go ahead use legacy at affected but that doesn’t mean that it will work for all of you, a lot of people think they want same 360 or what they call 1 to 1 sensitivity but what they’re really looking for is the same feel which 1.33 or 1.78 can provide and a lot of people are ok with that but if your the type of person to struggle using legacy because it doesn’t feel natural which I know for a lot of you it doesn’t, u may say u want it but what u want is to be comfortable with ur send and decide what works best for you by experementing I’ve done extensive research and extreme testing on Relatvie and legacy and how ur fov affects the scaling and I switch between them to whatever I feel like using , not saying you should keep switching but find what is natural and feels good to you , only way to get good
Hey Troll...I mean Don of Gambinos, every other video out there explains the concept and the math (which you ironically call science) behind it, but they do not show such a practical application. This is exactly what most people are looking for. We need to see what it looks like, which is why this video is perfect. We care as much about the “science” behind this concept as we do about your pretentious, deigning comment - which is not at all. Also, you should learn how to use periods...or any punctuation at all correctly. I’m sure there’s a science book out there on proper grammar you could read.
why didnt he do diffrent zooms , weird
dependes on what you call 1 to 1. legacy gives you the same cm/360 but relative gives you the same focal length which is the same distance the crosshair moves on the monitor per mouse movement
I was thinking it's better to use legacy so for kovaaks my practice would translate over. Ur basically saying it doesnt matter if I use relative or legacy if I'm using kovaaks to practice in?
@@ManuCapone_ mouse control translate over anyways, I use relative because I feel like monitor distance is more important but don't overthink it. You can get used to sensitivities very fast. If u want the same cm/360 and monitor distance the fov for AR low zoom effective on 120 fov is 97 and smg 110. If you ask me, just use relative.
The Focal length Scaling GODS approve this message
@@orrlicht3718 so you use relative at 1.33 and then AR zoom affected at 97 and SMG 110? I’m using 2560x1440 monitor. Just trying to figure out how to have zoom feel same as hipfire for everything
@@zmachine1690 I use sens randomiser in kovaak haha. I don't believe in long term muscle memory, I think its more abt mouse control so I use slow sens to develop large angle movements and high for smoothness and acc. There must be a video abt it, and there are FOV sens calculators that make sens feel the same in different fovs
Legacy e la migliore?
I like zero because my brain is used to the old way mw2 and cod4 used to calculate it, now I use it on every game
Yk that program that does the 360
Good video
Bro uhhh.. Isn't the point for this higher zoom scopes and sights. A regular red dot will of course have 1:1
I'll sacrifice the asd fov for 1:1 by playing on legacy :)
Legacy is the same as 0 coeficcient
@@kalebward4029 it is unless you play on 120 fov. Otherwise its slower
Sawing this if i can be better in Cod mobile
So I'm gonna assume legacy on console kbm is the move
@TheDryerNewt what monitor coefficient would I need to make the 360 on independent the same as my hipfire?
None of them if I were u I’d put to 1.78 and then adjust ads till the distance matches the hip but it’s gonna feel very weird bl
Thats legacy
legacy
instant is the better transitioning
1920 / 1080 = 1.777778.
800 / 600 = 1.33333
It’s all about the resolution u play. (+ sens on top. ) But all those values are found by dividing screen resolutions.
🤯
Resolution or Aspect Ratio?
this video is completely wrong,since it ignores what coeff does. ,the reticle moves with different speed near the center of the screen or the edge of the screen depending the values.sure the overall mouse distance travel for a 360 is specific ,but the sense is different while near the center of a screen or the edge,that is why 0 is for tracking(sense is scaled closer to hip while near the reticle),1.33 for close flicks(sense is scaled a little further than the reticle to match hip) and 1.78 for long flicks because it basically lets you have higher sense near the reticle but is decreased when near the edge of the screen. in fewer words....coeff isnt for same 360 but for analog matching hip/ads at certain distances from the center of the screen. cool vid but wrong and pointless
Just lmao
1.33 is the equivalent of playing on 4:3 aspect ratio 1920x1440, 1.78 is 16:9 1920x1080 and what is guy doesn't mention at all is coefficient is in relation to your vertical sensitivity.
So at 1.33 your vertical sensitivity (up and down) is 25% faster than horizontal. At 1.78 your horizontal speeds up slightly to match your vertical so they're the same. All of this is if you're playing at 1920x1080 16:9.
whats best for sniping/quick scopes ?