I would compare this more to Ark, and survival games in general, than Pokemon. The only comparison to Pokemon would be the monster looks but the rest of the game looks dead on like Ark, gameplaywise.
Don't use too much logic. It's especially funny when the game is praised for effort Pokemon games supposedly lack, when they straight up ripped off Pokemon designs. So much for effort, I guess.
@@byronhines8315are you talking about the same series when you go to cook curry and it shows severed kingler limbs sticking out And how you can make sandwiches using beef and pork Gee I wonder where they get it from
The game looks like those fan games where people think adding violence and cussing and whatnot makes it more mature. Seeing those monsters with guns is just cringe inducing.
Only thing that bothers me more than anything about this game and its hype... a lot folks that are into this game, are the same folks who hated folks for playing pokemon still lol.
Monster Taming that is Palworld it's in a genre Pokemon doesn't own a whole Sub Genre it's like Wolfenstein 3D creating the FPS genre they don't own a genre.
pal designs = clear pokemon ripoff, gameplay = survival genre im surprised nintendo has said nothing, the pal designs are ridiculously close to pokemon
Gameplay wise it is a survival/tower defence game, so not at all like a pokemon game(not personally interested in that type of game, so won't personally play the game). The monsters is the area where you could argue that even parts of the models are taking directly from pokemon (often with taking parts from multiple pokemon to make one monster). I like the monsters that are more original (fx the penguin one or the white dragon with fearther/angel wings), but the closer the monster is to existing pokemon (not in the concept behind the monster, but in the model themselves) the more I dislike the monster. It just feel like a waste to not try to distinguish themselves more, but I guess the attention it get from being the "pokemon with guns" might make it worth it for them. Edit: The AI thing mostly come from speculation, since the devs probably/might support nft's and AI art, where the AI art part comes from a game they made containing AI art. But hopefully for the people, who like the game, the game will only improve and at some point come out of early access(at the very least considering that their last game, craftopia, if I remember right, is still in early access, where it maybe never will leave early access, at least that is how people talk about the game.)
The AI thing is fake same with NFT stuff also it is not just a Survival Tower defence game, it has massive boss battles better than any Pokemon game and the depth of what you can do with your Pals is also more in depth. The battle system is the same but just not turn based but the rest is the exact same as Pokemon. I would never call it a waste when they are breaking PC sales records nearly right now and being the most played game on Steam today which only happened last with Baldurs Gate 3.
I feel like I am looking at the likes of Wooloo, Lucario, Meganium, Salamance, Grookey, Donphan, Zebstrika, Electivire, etc in a survival game with guns. Looks really cool honestly.
Have you seen Direhowl? It's straight up Lycanroc Day Form without the rocks and a black and white color scheme. Also Rayhound is like a conglomerate of Lucario (face) and has Raichu's tail and a round plump body.
i wouldn't have issues with it actually, aside from the ai allegations and the fanbase' intentional dragging of Pokemon to gain reactions/interactions.
I see some similarities with some of the pals designs that look very alike to some pokemons we know. Adding it to the fact you throw a ball to capture / tame, a pal, it does look like it's a pokemon fan made game. Personally i don't really care if it does seem like a pokemon meet Ark game. If it looks fun and adds new things i haven't seen much, then i'm down to play it. Valorant is literally a rip off of CSGO and i don't see people cancelling it, in matter of fact, it's a very successful and popular game. So to me the whole drama just seems silly and childish.
exactly, imo the creators clearly use an a.i program to make the pal designs and it based them off pokemon, in this aspect it is a ripoff but clearly the designs and gameplay are different enough that nintendo have refrained from sueing so if they don't care, why should anyone else if the game is good.
You can beat wild Pals to a snooze with a baseball bat while your Pal becomes a flamethrower or starts leaning into its AK 😂 There's some whacky mechanics that are probably going to have us all in stitches. Pokemon has it's own really well developed IV system that is versatile enough for it to have existed in red, go, violet, and such. Pokemon cannot really pivot to a whacky violent iteration as a 2 pillar game; competitive and for kids first
I think people missed the point on what pokemon games are gear for. Game free just needs to add more content within the story. All the pixel pokemon games had a lot of content that got me immerse in the lore. The 3d pokemon games need to capture that feeling again.
Ppl mad at Palworld are just upset that a new ip that runs better than Pokémon games is doing good. They don’t care about whether the company actually or used AI or not. And the allegations are baseless too, other than a few models that are similar so I understand that. Regardless. Pokémon/Nintendo fans are cringe.
The issue is the flow of the game is slow and without a proper tutorial it might turn people off but once you get thru the slow phase of the game than you can truly appreciate what the game has to offer
not sure how you can compare the multiplayer (let alone say pokemon is better) when pvp hasn't even been implemented yet. Competitive isn't even something most players engage with, the casual audience is mostly here for the co-op which i dont really see in pokemon games.
It is definitely very interesting to be sure, I will watch its journey quietly with great interest. I have been greatly enjoying the game on my laptop via Steam. I left a comment before but thought I’d leave another.
It will be a pokemon killer because it is very similar to it and it doesnt look or run like absolute trash. The last pokemon game was such an embarrasment in my opinion. Really hope the Switch 2 is a lot more powerful so there arent any excuses.
I don't know what "amazing things" you're talking about, but just because game Y does one thing doesn't mean game X has to do the same. Game franchises are allowed to be their own thing.
*Take 3D models of all Pokemon.* *Run them through AI software that can randomize/mix and match body parts and colors and size.* *Use new software to create "original hand-drawn" characters from the AI generated ones.* *Create game.* *Technically the software/game now does not contain any AI code so all good.*
Design wise is a ripoff, heck, there are scenes that are the same as promotional material of scarlet and violet, at least animations seems new and not copied like what genshin impact did when it copies a lot of stuff from zelda botw, it did evolve from that though but still XD. Anyways, even with been a ripoff I'm glad people can show gamefreak you can have good animations and graphics and also tons of other stuff.
@@JJFT235They are billionaries dude... if you have time issues, you get more people to save on the time constraints... They just don't care, animations are a mess, that is lack of ability not just time...
@@soragrandaif you look at their staff credits they have a lot of people working on the recent games. And hiring people takes time and you gotta acclimate them into your work culture. The money isn’t necessarily going to Game Freak, it’s going to other places like Creatures Inc., Nintendo, TPC, etc. plus they earn more revenue through merch.
@JJFT235 Subcontractors do tiny stuff, not big things, they credit them but is gamefreak staff that handles key stuff, which is what fails. Also, the stuff about "the money goes" is a lie, one that people have been repeating for years and is a mess dude. Creatures Inc, Nintendo and Gamefreak are all CO-OWNERS of the IP, in Japan if you co-own an IP you receive a part of the revenue it provides, in equity btw, they create The Pokemon Company to handle the profit margin they decided which we don't know exactly how much but is not the majority since the 3 companies handle the big decisions within The pokemon company, current top head of TPC is ex top head of Gamefreak. Seriously, dude, stop lying.
Well it's also on PC and not on a console stuck on 720p and wasn't rushed unlike Nintendo did with forcing Gamefreak to come out with Scarlet and Violet.
Game freak not nintendo, Nintendo didn't rush the product, the Pokemon company and Game freaks stupid mentality of rleeasing a game every 3 years and rush said game is on them. NOT Nintendo, wish people learn and do research as Nintendo just publish the games and don't make the game.@@CoffeeSteve7224
@@NuiYabuko my guy it's like obvious. I mean seriously. Literally they came out with BD/SP and Legends Arceus in the same year. And Scarlet and Violet was rushed. If it wasn't it wouldn't have had as many issues as it had.
@@CoffeeSteve7224 BDSP and PLA didn't come out in the same year, they also have separate teams, so the same devs obviously weren't working on both games at the same time. When everything like the anime series etc. is set in stone, then they can't reasonably delay things without losing a whole lot of money, that doesn't mean that anyone from Nintendo or GF forces them. So much for obvious.
Pokémon sucks because of dexit? As if you actually catching 1000 Pokémon and then never using them anyway. No the game sucks because the devs get barely any development time have bad graphics, framerate and overall tech even for a switch game etc.
@obba40 idid catch em all and routinely bred new ones and shinies but what kind of bs argument is this I need to use every mon to justify a national dex? Lmao
Palworld is a pc version of Pokemon. + Palworld allows you to build bases and factories, climb everything and use ((GUNS)), while Pokemon is just about catching pokemon over and over with no guns and no building. we wanded pokemon with guns for years, but nintendo never lisens what people want.
If they can be more original with their monster designs and not rip existing models and recoloring them slash redesigning them and call it their own. Then yeah Palworld can be great-, the designs are way to similar to the Pokemon models, so maybe if they can change them a bit more then be no problem. Let's face it thuogh, ANY and EVERY one is going to find controversey over anything that is popular or getting traction.
I went on Twitch to see what the Palworld views were, and they were at over 280k. Even when a new Pokémon game is released, the most views I've ever seen is at about 50k. Pokémon is a great brand, but it's being mishandled. It's like they have no idea who their fan base is now.
there is a lot of fixing a quality of life improves that need to be made. its weird they're charging 30USD for this Alpha Beta test. i had 10 crashes so far. the frst five were quick succession after i just loaded up the game. the next 5 were after long hours of playing straight. but so far no cashes after that.
Seems like an interesting idea and I kind of dig the artstyle which is definitely leaning into Fortnite territory but the grindy nature of the game is a big turnoff for me personally. I am glad to hear that the game is seemingly selling well as competition is definitely the thing that Pokemon needs THE MOST which will hopefully push them to do better in the future (although honestly I think Pokemon's biggest issue is their release cadence not giving them more dev time for their games).
I would compare this more to Ark, and survival games in general, than Pokemon. The only comparison to Pokemon would be the monster looks but the rest of the game looks dead on like Ark, gameplaywise.
Using this game as an excuse to hate on Pokemon is very toxic there’s no need for it just enjoy it quietly and peacefully they can coexist
Don't use too much logic.
It's especially funny when the game is praised for effort Pokemon games supposedly lack, when they straight up ripped off Pokemon designs. So much for effort, I guess.
@@NuiYabukoig
The fact you can craft a meat cleaver to kill your pals for meat shows this isnt a Pokémon game
You can also capture people as well
but in pokemon they eat pokemon they just don't show or focus on that even Oak mentioned it
@@banzaicroc9227And butcher them!
@banzaicroc9227 didn't know, wow, that's even more messed up
@@byronhines8315are you talking about the same series when you go to cook curry and it shows severed kingler limbs sticking out
And how you can make sandwiches using beef and pork
Gee I wonder where they get it from
Seems weird to see Pokemon like animals getting hit in the head with a club😂
These palworld creatures are frauds 😭 you'll never catch a Scyther for example, getting beaten by a human with a club or gun
in pokemon they showed a maicarp being chopped up and eaten so it isnt so far fetch
The game looks like those fan games where people think adding violence and cussing and whatnot makes it more mature. Seeing those monsters with guns is just cringe inducing.
Game Freak is not about to make pokemon into a M rated game or another ark survival
Only thing that bothers me more than anything about this game and its hype... a lot folks that are into this game, are the same folks who hated folks for playing pokemon still lol.
Lol. They gonna be big mad when the next pokemon game come out.
Monster Taming that is Palworld it's in a genre Pokemon doesn't own a whole Sub Genre it's like Wolfenstein 3D creating the FPS genre they don't own a genre.
You can say Mario kart, and smash brothers also have this type of thing happening more than once occasionally
Yes basically Mario Kart founded the Mascot Racer Genre and Platform Fighter Genre was founded by Smash Bros.
Yeah, it's not a rip off because of that, it's a rip off because they have shamelessly copied Pokemon designs and passed it off as their own!
problem with that is pokemon didn't create the genre either hell it was a "ripoff" of another game
@DragonMasterKeel
Basically Shin Megami Tensei predates Pokemon therefore it is the father of the Genre.
pal designs = clear pokemon ripoff, gameplay = survival genre
im surprised nintendo has said nothing, the pal designs are ridiculously close to pokemon
They aren't Pokemon they're "pals" they can't take legal action
hate how it a ripoff of pokemon on monsters design instead of making an original one and that would 've been better
Gonna cry ?
@@kolz4ever1980 I guess you are with how salty you are.
Im sorry but this game is better than any 3D Pokemon game and its sad...
As a hardcore Pokémon fan this game is 20 years ahead of any Pokémon game and it’s sad they need to step up there game
Legend of arceus was a breath of fresh air. Hope they make another legends game.
No Pal was harmed or abuse during the making of this video.
Gameplay wise it is a survival/tower defence game, so not at all like a pokemon game(not personally interested in that type of game, so won't personally play the game). The monsters is the area where you could argue that even parts of the models are taking directly from pokemon (often with taking parts from multiple pokemon to make one monster). I like the monsters that are more original (fx the penguin one or the white dragon with fearther/angel wings), but the closer the monster is to existing pokemon (not in the concept behind the monster, but in the model themselves) the more I dislike the monster. It just feel like a waste to not try to distinguish themselves more, but I guess the attention it get from being the "pokemon with guns" might make it worth it for them.
Edit:
The AI thing mostly come from speculation, since the devs probably/might support nft's and AI art, where the AI art part comes from a game they made containing AI art.
But hopefully for the people, who like the game, the game will only improve and at some point come out of early access(at the very least considering that their last game, craftopia, if I remember right, is still in early access, where it maybe never will leave early access, at least that is how people talk about the game.)
The AI thing is fake same with NFT stuff also it is not just a Survival Tower defence game, it has massive boss battles better than any Pokemon game and the depth of what you can do with your Pals is also more in depth. The battle system is the same but just not turn based but the rest is the exact same as Pokemon. I would never call it a waste when they are breaking PC sales records nearly right now and being the most played game on Steam today which only happened last with Baldurs Gate 3.
@@TheEregos It's not "exact same as Pokemon".
I think your comment is fair bc you are simply uninformed. If you play the game you'd realize it. Nothing about it tower defense
Game feels more like ark
A game like this is good for healthy competition. You better believe Gamefreak is gonna go all out with the next Pokémon title to Switch 2.
I feel like I am looking at the likes of Wooloo, Lucario, Meganium, Salamance, Grookey, Donphan, Zebstrika, Electivire, etc in a survival game with guns. Looks really cool honestly.
Have you seen Direhowl? It's straight up Lycanroc Day Form without the rocks and a black and white color scheme.
Also Rayhound is like a conglomerate of Lucario (face) and has Raichu's tail and a round plump body.
i wouldn't have issues with it actually, aside from the ai allegations and the fanbase' intentional dragging of Pokemon to gain reactions/interactions.
I mean Pokémon has been a terrible franchise for the last 3 main line titles so I don’t blame them
I see some similarities with some of the pals designs that look very alike to some pokemons we know. Adding it to the fact you throw a ball to capture / tame, a pal, it does look like it's a pokemon fan made game. Personally i don't really care if it does seem like a pokemon meet Ark game. If it looks fun and adds new things i haven't seen much, then i'm down to play it.
Valorant is literally a rip off of CSGO and i don't see people cancelling it, in matter of fact, it's a very successful and popular game. So to me the whole drama just seems silly and childish.
exactly, imo the creators clearly use an a.i program to make the pal designs and it based them off pokemon, in this aspect it is a ripoff but clearly the designs and gameplay are different enough that nintendo have refrained from sueing so if they don't care, why should anyone else if the game is good.
This game is fun, pokemon stans are over reacting about the designs being “stolen,” when they should be worrying about that day one patch
The designs are outright shameless.
Edit: Also nice whataboutism.
Kinda good ngl
Im a poke fan. But love this game.
Pokemon Red, White and Blue
You can beat wild Pals to a snooze with a baseball bat while your Pal becomes a flamethrower or starts leaning into its AK 😂
There's some whacky mechanics that are probably going to have us all in stitches.
Pokemon has it's own really well developed IV system that is versatile enough for it to have existed in red, go, violet, and such. Pokemon cannot really pivot to a whacky violent iteration as a 2 pillar game; competitive and for kids first
I think people missed the point on what pokemon games are gear for. Game free just needs to add more content within the story. All the pixel pokemon games had a lot of content that got me immerse in the lore. The 3d pokemon games need to capture that feeling again.
It's a Satire. Catching people in Pokeballs cracked me up 🤣🤣
More impressive then scarlet and violet busted game
Legends arceus had some crafting elements
Ppl mad at Palworld are just upset that a new ip that runs better than Pokémon games is doing good. They don’t care about whether the company actually or used AI or not. And the allegations are baseless too, other than a few models that are similar so I understand that. Regardless. Pokémon/Nintendo fans are cringe.
Too much crafting and it crashes a lot
Pals, also known as pokemon allies
If anything Game Freak should take notes from this game.
Nah.
@@NuiYabuko Yah
In terms of graphics and overall performance yes. but some other aspects no
@@ghostofhallownest5300 I play it on Steam it ain’t mid. It’s quite fun.
I think this game is something special. Hopefully a game like this will cause Game Freak to wake up and do better, but I have my doubts.
Do better than what exactly?
@@NuiYabuko Get creative. Bigger World that Runs because even this Poorly optimized game runs better than Pokemon on Switch.
@@silverhawkscape2677I hope you know they fixed their last game.
@@6gredlite907no they didn’t actually lol the game still runs like trash
The issue is the flow of the game is slow and without a proper tutorial it might turn people off but once you get thru the slow phase of the game than you can truly appreciate what the game has to offer
For it got so good once I got over that part
It is definitely very interesting to be sure, I will watch its journey quietly with great interest.
not sure how you can compare the multiplayer (let alone say pokemon is better) when pvp hasn't even been implemented yet. Competitive isn't even something most players engage with, the casual audience is mostly here for the co-op which i dont really see in pokemon games.
It is definitely very interesting to be sure, I will watch its journey quietly with great interest. I have been greatly enjoying the game on my laptop via Steam. I left a comment before but thought I’d leave another.
It will be a pokemon killer because it is very similar to it and it doesnt look or run like absolute trash. The last pokemon game was such an embarrasment in my opinion. Really hope the Switch 2 is a lot more powerful so there arent any excuses.
Pokemon rips off other anime gimmicks for years now, so what if someone created a similar game to mock them
Definitely will be buying this!
It's a fun game I'm having a blast on it I even have my first shiny fire kitty
I killed my first shiny by accident but it was only a Chikipi
@@Blueissuperior oh dang sure more will show up at some point
Do these creatures evolve?
@@sovereignblastoise6767Yes
fire kitty??? do you mean the foxes?
2:01 GOTY Right there.
Pokémon has been out for 27 years and hasn't implemented any of these amazing things, they suck as a company tbh lol
That’s the sad thing
I don't know what "amazing things" you're talking about, but just because game Y does one thing doesn't mean game X has to do the same. Game franchises are allowed to be their own thing.
@@NuiYabuko yup just like I can have my own opinion on them.
@NuiYabuko only thing I know that gamefreak drop the ball on is not keeping mega evolutions.
*Take 3D models of all Pokemon.*
*Run them through AI software that can randomize/mix and match body parts and colors and size.*
*Use new software to create "original hand-drawn" characters from the AI generated ones.*
*Create game.*
*Technically the software/game now does not contain any AI code so all good.*
*)take all real life being and mythical creatures
Design wise is a ripoff, heck, there are scenes that are the same as promotional material of scarlet and violet, at least animations seems new and not copied like what genshin impact did when it copies a lot of stuff from zelda botw, it did evolve from that though but still XD.
Anyways, even with been a ripoff I'm glad people can show gamefreak you can have good animations and graphics and also tons of other stuff.
I’m sure Game Freak would want all of that if they had more time.
@@JJFT235They are billionaries dude... if you have time issues, you get more people to save on the time constraints...
They just don't care, animations are a mess, that is lack of ability not just time...
@@soragrandaif you look at their staff credits they have a lot of people working on the recent games. And hiring people takes time and you gotta acclimate them into your work culture. The money isn’t necessarily going to Game Freak, it’s going to other places like Creatures Inc., Nintendo, TPC, etc. plus they earn more revenue through merch.
@JJFT235 Subcontractors do tiny stuff, not big things, they credit them but is gamefreak staff that handles key stuff, which is what fails.
Also, the stuff about "the money goes" is a lie, one that people have been repeating for years and is a mess dude.
Creatures Inc, Nintendo and Gamefreak are all CO-OWNERS of the IP, in Japan if you co-own an IP you receive a part of the revenue it provides, in equity btw, they create The Pokemon Company to handle the profit margin they decided which we don't know exactly how much but is not the majority since the 3 companies handle the big decisions within The pokemon company, current top head of TPC is ex top head of Gamefreak.
Seriously, dude, stop lying.
@@soragrandaI think we’re actually agreeing on the revenue part. Game Freak doesn’t get all of the revenue that’s where I’m getting at.
The creature designs are a blatant ripoff. That being said, it would be nice to see Pokemon with this level of graphics fidelity.
This game is fun. Period. I have never played Pokemon.
Both the blasphemous audacity and outrageous memetastic fun 😅😆🤣
Even designs are ripoff lol.
This game embarrasses Pokémon 😂. Lets be honest. It looks,runs,and is a hundred times bigger 😂
Well it's also on PC and not on a console stuck on 720p and wasn't rushed unlike Nintendo did with forcing Gamefreak to come out with Scarlet and Violet.
Game freak not nintendo, Nintendo didn't rush the product, the Pokemon company and Game freaks stupid mentality of rleeasing a game every 3 years and rush said game is on them. NOT Nintendo, wish people learn and do research as Nintendo just publish the games and don't make the game.@@CoffeeSteve7224
@@CoffeeSteve7224 Are you part of the dev team or how do you know their inner workings?
@@NuiYabuko my guy it's like obvious. I mean seriously. Literally they came out with BD/SP and Legends Arceus in the same year. And Scarlet and Violet was rushed. If it wasn't it wouldn't have had as many issues as it had.
@@CoffeeSteve7224 BDSP and PLA didn't come out in the same year, they also have separate teams, so the same devs obviously weren't working on both games at the same time. When everything like the anime series etc. is set in stone, then they can't reasonably delay things without losing a whole lot of money, that doesn't mean that anyone from Nintendo or GF forces them. So much for obvious.
I mean pokemon sucks now thanks to dexit
Pokémon sucks because of dexit? As if you actually catching 1000 Pokémon and then never using them anyway. No the game sucks because the devs get barely any development time have bad graphics, framerate and overall tech even for a switch game etc.
@obba40 idid catch em all and routinely bred new ones and shinies but what kind of bs argument is this I need to use every mon to justify a national dex? Lmao
Scarlet and Violet did the same thing. You cannot bring every single Pokemon in that game.
@SoraFan23 the 3ds could... no problem. Why on a much more powerful console were they not able to do so? Oh right, they're lazy
@@Joseph928100 Thats when it was doable when it was 600-700 mons. Now its not doable at 1k. You cant design 1k in 3 or 4 years worth of time.
Palworld is a pc version of Pokemon. + Palworld allows you to build bases and factories, climb everything and use ((GUNS)), while Pokemon is just about catching pokemon over and over with no guns and no building. we wanded pokemon with guns for years, but nintendo never lisens what people want.
Game is fun. Modders need to go crazy ASAP
Of those monsters are AI generated I’m excited for a No Man Sky type game where each planet has much more variety of life!
Its Wayy more than that
This is nothing but a pokemon fornite game lol. Pokénite
Pokemon/monster hunder rise look alike🤔
Who knew if you just threw in pocket monsters in with a survival game you would get something this good?
Crazy. I was just watching another video on Palworld. I hope it gets ported cause I dont have a pc i have a mac and I dont have an xbox
Buy xbox Series or if not xbox one to play
palworld is actually very fun
If they can be more original with their monster designs and not rip existing models and recoloring them slash redesigning them and call it their own. Then yeah Palworld can be great-, the designs are way to similar to the Pokemon models, so maybe if they can change them a bit more then be no problem.
Let's face it thuogh, ANY and EVERY one is going to find controversey over anything that is popular or getting traction.
I had more fun with palworld in one day than I had with Pokemon since gen 5.
I went on Twitch to see what the Palworld views were, and they were at over 280k. Even when a new Pokémon game is released, the most views I've ever seen is at about 50k. Pokémon is a great brand, but it's being mishandled. It's like they have no idea who their fan base is now.
They need to update it fix up npc n pals geting stuck 😂
They need to add NPCs and small towns cities and this will be A+ right now it's a B+ for effort
there is a lot of fixing a quality of life improves that need to be made. its weird they're charging 30USD for this Alpha Beta test. i had 10 crashes so far. the frst five were quick succession after i just loaded up the game. the next 5 were after long hours of playing straight. but so far no cashes after that.
@@matthewjuarbe5826 I had a save data glitch I thought the game removed my save lol but yeah hopefully they fix it keep enjoying
Something more for sure, it is better than any Pokemon game released in the last 15 years and that is not cap.
As a hardcore Pokemon fan I agree they do things that Pokemon should be doing it's not that polished but it's a good game tho with humungous potential
Now that all cap. The pixel pokemon games were very addicting.
Seems like an interesting idea and I kind of dig the artstyle which is definitely leaning into Fortnite territory but the grindy nature of the game is a big turnoff for me personally. I am glad to hear that the game is seemingly selling well as competition is definitely the thing that Pokemon needs THE MOST which will hopefully push them to do better in the future (although honestly I think Pokemon's biggest issue is their release cadence not giving them more dev time for their games).
You can kill the grind with exp speed and other changes you can make to your world.
Who in the world should care if they used AI? Is the game good? That’s the only question that matters.
Boomers that wasted their lives sitting at a table doing something that now can be done in mere moments. ;)
@@kolz4ever1980 Imagine championing that.
@@NuiYabuko keep crying boomer. :) It's not gonna stop the future of ai. So keep imagining
They havent used ai.
@kolz4ever1980 AI are being used for a lot worse than gaming, and you're hyping it up. It seems you don't know better.
FIGHT BACK Gamefreak! 😭
hi OJ
At least I can stomach to play this unlike that other one
If you like pokemon you’ll like this game forget the bias it’s a good game
It's awesome
Haha crappy pokemon company and the guys pay 70$ 😂
They look a Lot like a Pokemon.. and get to beat them or blast caps in them :D lol
For a second I thought this was like a Rom Hack of Pokemon Legends Arceus. Just looking at the style reminds me so much of it.
Xbox should buy palworld to have something that can be used to put against Pokémon
Bro fr well I'm sure they partnering with them but this could be something huge hell its already huge but they can make a show out of it ect...
Stop hyping up every Monster Taming Game as that it is unhealthy for the Developers.🤦♂️
This is just monster hunter