@@ReldrikGeo Sage Kashyapa is the father of both the asuras and the devas, who are born of his two wives Diti and Aditi respectively. This is symbolic of the good and not so good inherent not only in nature and the external world but also within each individual. Asuras are not necessarily evil but they were strong and powerful and hence vain. Devas also known as Suras were more benevolent hence always in strife with Asuras. Asuras always in constant fight with Devas for dominance . Both Being sons of the sage were equally knowledgeable and competent.
@@ReldrikGeoi think he don't about pali praktik. Its language of buddha. So no avidence of Sanskrit before Buddhist era. So pali is oldest language..
@@ReldrikGeo That also means Himachal (from the name of the state) means Ice slopes. Achala = Slopes/Sloped land. Himachal Pradesh are the ice slopes of the Himalaya Mountain range.
Him- standh is not Sankrit word 😂 he just made it probably Google translation ice and mount ( berg ) Sankrit word is himgiri for iceberg And in RigVeda it's vritya ( water obstacles however it's for glacier mostly) it's mythical name Indra destroying the serpent who blocked the water of sapt Sindhu After fall of vritra sapt Sindhu flooded with water ( mythological glaciers fall down and flooding)
43:50. It's the fact. It's the only language which connects all of South Asia. I know Kannada, Telugu, Tamil, Hindi... It's the only language which connects the whole of South Asia. It's influence on South East Asian languages too should be considered.
@@plazmagaming2182The Tamil monarchs used to take up Sanskrit titles like Rajendra, Raja Raja, Sundara, etc. That itself shows that they understood the significance of Sanskrit as a connecting link in the subcontinent.
the origins of Zoroastrians and Hindus is quite frankly the most fascinating piece of ancient history which gives us the insight into two neighboring most ancient civilizations, the start of civilization on planet earth the earliest gathas(zoroastrian holy books) and early rigvada is more like a cultural history book than a holy book the very names of the modern day nations the land of aryas, Iran and Bharat derive from the the ancient holy books
Confusion of tamil being oldest language is created by politicians, tamil is older than classical sanskrit but vedic sanskrit is the oldest if we treat classical and vedic sanskrit as seperate languages
sanskrit language have i nfluence very much spread in south asia and south east asia some city still have sanskrit like even bangkok it shortfied actuaclly very long
18:00 pitch system is very important in sanskrit.... As all mantras have certain pitch to sing..... If mantras are read at certain pitch you can tap into different energy frequencies. You can see videos of vanaras ghat aarti... During that mantra chanting the aarti happens even in storm and nothing happens to fire.
Back with a new word in this video: Himstambh (Ice pillar), is made up of "hima" for snow and "Stambh" for pillar. Now we have 3 words with "snow": Himstambh, Himālaya and Himāchal Pradesh
9:41 Lemme try to explain 😉 I chose (♾️= many)😏 1 ----> one horse 2 ----> two horses ♾️ ----> many horses Hindi; 1 ---> ek ghoda 2 ---> do dhode ♾️ --> anek ghode What did you found (Horse and horses) And (ghoda and ghode) changes for only one and others while its remain same for 2 and many. like (2,3,4 horses and ♾️ horses) same as hindi but not in Sanskrit In Sanskrit; 1 ---> ekah ashva 2 ---> dvou ashyou ♾️ ---> bahavah ashvaah In this it changes for 1,2 and♾️ Please give me feedback you understand or not. To be honest 😜
I like ur reaction videos.. coz u not only watch it.. but also engage in to it… Sanskrit is a very Ancient language.. would probably need 10 videos like this, if just wanna go in to surface level understanding..
I'm here to learn first and foremost so yes I want to engage and share my thoughts. It's a TH-cam video so I also need to be entertaining to an extent and that is also why I try to talk and share my own thoughts. This is a very deep video and I know now I have so much more I need to learn
Don’t you think the theory that the Indo-European language originated in Russia is somewhat half-baked? Recent studies suggest that the Indo-European language originated in western Iran. Genetic studies have discovered a Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers component that spread to the steppe and a similar Iranian Neolithic component (in the Zagros) that spread eastward. This component was found in Bronze Age Anatolia without steppe ancestry. The Yamnaya were roughly 1/3 CHG or Iran_Neolithic. Iran_Neolithic ancestry comprises 40-60% of all modern Indians. Don’t you think Iranian Neolithic farmers migrated toward Russia around 7,000-8,000 years ago, forming the Yamnaya culture? Perhaps these people originated from Mehrgarh or Bhirrana in the Indian subcontinent, as India and Iran were better suited for human settlement 10,000 years ago than Russia, which experienced a cold and temperate climate heavily influenced by the last Ice Age. The cow is significant in Indo-Aryan culture. The Indo-Europeans were central to the domestication of the bull/cow, the invention of the wheeled wagon, dairying practices, and milk consumption. However, the cow was domesticated in the Indus Valley Civilization over 9,000 years ago and in Anatolia separately. If one believes the steppe people domesticated the horse and then entered India, this migration never affected the genetic lineage of Indian cow breeds. Cattle genetics conclusively prove that no admixture of Taurine cattle into India has ever occurred. It seems silly to think that Indo-Aryans came to India without a single cow. If we look at Russia, the Proto-Uralic language formed around the same time as the Indo-European language in relatively close proximity without any connection between them. In the Caucasus region or near the Black Sea, there are unrelated Kartvelian languages that formed around the same time or earlier than Indo-European. Do you think the Burushaski language in northern Pakistan might be related to a pre-Proto-Indo-European language, given that haplogroup R2 is significantly present among the Burusho people? Haplogroup R2 is estimated to have emerged around 15,000 years ago, likely in the Indian subcontinent, while R1 originated in Central Asia and R itself in West and South Asia. It seems likely that the Indo-European language originated in Iran, the Indus Valley, or the BMAC culture.
@@ReldrikGeo What he says is partially true the Yamnaya that lived in Ukraine and southern Russia are a mixture of Caucasian Hunter gathers, Iranian Neolithic from south of the Caucas mountains and almost more than half it is from EHG (eastern european hunter gathers) how lives in russia and siberia. But that does not mean they came out of India more like they came from Iranic sphere surrounding the caucus mountains. The Scythians were considered to be a iranian people with reddish hair that lived in the european steppe. Phenotypically speaking contrary to 20th century fascist pseudoscience the indo-european migrations into northern europe actually made them less blond and blue eyed, the pre indo-european funnel beaker culture was more blond and eyed than current Scandinavian population. The Yamnaya/Proto indo europeans were closest in appearance to slavic people, who have mostly brown hair (before the Norse/Rus/Rurikid migrations during viking age which introduced more light flaxen hair) and might have had skin tone one or two shades darker than modern slavs.
I know right, you don't understand devnagri script, so you kinda missed some connections made. It's like a British guy just understands English well no matter hwo broken it is because he just _recognizes_ based on his memory.
Its sad to say but both Christianity and Islam did the same thing. All the Neolithic Europe cultures, Celtic cultures were destroyed after the introduction of Christianity, while all middle east cultures were destroyed after the introduction of Islam.
Neolithic cultures were destroyed by the incoming indo europeans not christiantiy where tf you get your facts from. Neolithic cultures were long gone by the time christianity was even invented
Vedic Sanskrit was not it's real name, it's called chhando bhasha or arya bhasha, later this arya bhasha transformed into many prakrit languages, then panini made Sanskrit from arya bhasha / chhando bhasha and many prakrit languages. Later when arya bhasha/ chhando bhasha got fazed out by prakrit, Brahmins tried to and succeed in renaming chhando bhasha or arya bhasha as Sanskrit (which was latter formation). So first there were two main languages, arya bhasha and proto-dravidian, then came prakrit and tamil languages, then Sanskrit(litrally means purified) and other later derived languages from prakrits and tamilian languages
@@narutouzumaki2157 bro I'm talking about can we find it from any ancient source, In which it is said that this language is chhando Bhasha or something like that.
@orientalguy9462 vedic language had no name in it's time, later when vedic language turned into prakrit languages the old vedic language remained in the verses or chhandas of vedas, it was called chandobhashha because it was the language of rig vedic verses. Then panini made Sanskrit(literally means purified) from purifying various prakrit and Chandobhasha and organising it into a proper grammatical and logical language. The later Brahmins started calling the vedic language itself as sanskrit(purified)
@@narutouzumaki2157 that's what I want to know whether people used to call that old Vedic language as chhando Bhasha or not from ancient sources? Otherwise it would just be a hypothesis.
The problem with sanskrit is that many ppl idolize it and many despise it because nature of colonialism and castism that we have lost meaning of appreciating the beauty of each other culture and also the way tribalism has induced within us has made it very difficult to learn about our history. Nowadays everything is controversial and we cannot learn for sake of learning about cultures.
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o Its wrong in the sense ppl will make it as if everything started with sanskrit and false sense of superiority within mass. This will create more tribalism and hate with others.
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o bro im not even Dravidian. This why indians are easy to manipulate because we assume things that others are dravidian , north indian, east indian etc. I just wanna say just appreciate culture dont idolize or become zombie for it. If someone hates your culture you just tell them the truth no need to do whataboutery
Tamil is an older spoken language than Sanskrit. Records of the Tamil language date to the third century BCE and records of the Sanskrit language date to the second century BCE. Tamil is still in everyday use today, but Sanskrit died out around 600 BCE and is used for mainly religious and literature purposes today. Sanskrit is older but it's dead considerd but Tamil is alive not older than Sanskrit but it's the oldest alive language...hope this helps to clear confusion.. both language have words from each other it's connected
Fact correction "vedas are not written or constructed in 500-1500 BCE. " They are much older than that. It preserves astronomical records far back from 70k+ years which are in no way could be known by human in 500-1500BCE. Of course Vedas or any other texts from sanskriti were passed on to generation by verbal means as those were only way it could be preserved. "Books can perish. Take invasion for example. Khilji burned whole library"..... It's just that only available ancient copies of vedas are written in 500-1500 BCE. It's a misconception and very ignorantly foolish of western scholars(are they really? These racist clasists?) To think that vedas are from 1500 BCE
Islam is a conquest, ppl might dislike my take but it is how Islam spread in west Asia, although in Arab nations they needed to, cuz it was all waring tribes and Suads needed to get power
I am a Tamilian and there is NO definitive proof of which is older Tamil or Sanskrit. Both sides should stop trying to claim to be the oldest without substantial proof.. Both are some of the oldest in the world thats enough for now.
Yeah the fact that tamil is 5,000+ yrs old is just fascinating. Has it not changed during the course of time? Anyways I will be learning the language for sure in the future to contribute towards conserving tamil language.
@@perryhandiqueshorts2364 There is NO proof of current Tamil 5000 years ago.. Dont just blabber anything.. What they estimate is proto Dravidian as being possibly 5000 years ago.
Well sanskrit or samskrutham is an Indian language and languages that are Influenced by it are indo-european. Think about it according to puranas migration happened outwards from india not inwards.
It not, it just spoken by indians, also belong to srilanka as well so it not just belong to india, no one proved sanskrit is older than tamizh, either way.
@@suryasuryaks6653people get confuse, vedic sanskrit is older than tamizh but classical sanskrit isn't. The correct sentence many experts say is Tamizh is oldest "living" language. People often neglect the world living and just say oldest language. linguistics definitely say Sanskrit (Vedic) is older than Tamil.❤ Both are great languages of India and they influenced languages in other countries too❤
![Dreamforce AI - Matthew McConaughey, Dr. Jane Goodall DBE, Sadhguru On Purpose & Legacy [FULL TALK]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fUfVW80k9Q0/mqdefault.jpg)
What a great reaction bro! You r one of the rarest ppl in the internet who is genuinely interested in learning our culture Much respect bro
I appreciate that. I definitely want to learn as much as I can and I will try to be respectful when I do so
@@ReldrikGeo Sanskrit is very old language
@@ReldrikGeoCan you react to video on telugu from the same channel
@@ReldrikGeo Sage Kashyapa is the father of both the asuras and the devas, who are born of his two wives Diti and Aditi respectively. This is symbolic of the good and not so good inherent not only in nature and the external world but also within each individual. Asuras are not necessarily evil but they were strong and powerful and hence vain. Devas also known as Suras were more benevolent hence always in strife with Asuras. Asuras always in constant fight with Devas for dominance . Both Being sons of the sage were equally knowledgeable and competent.
@@ReldrikGeoi think he don't about pali praktik. Its language of buddha. So no avidence of Sanskrit before Buddhist era. So pali is oldest language..
18:00 i am from Odisha and the vedic sanskrit felt more fammiliar to me
i think it could be because of chanting of mantras in temples
You can connect him-stambh (हिम-स्तंभ)meaning iceberg/icepillar with Himalayas, where Him means ice and Alaya means Abode
You are right
@@ReldrikGeo That also means Himachal (from the name of the state) means Ice slopes. Achala = Slopes/Sloped land. Himachal Pradesh are the ice slopes of the Himalaya Mountain range.
Him- standh is not Sankrit word 😂 he just made it probably Google translation ice and mount ( berg )
Sankrit word is himgiri for iceberg
And in RigVeda it's vritya ( water obstacles however it's for glacier mostly) it's mythical name
Indra destroying the serpent who blocked the water of sapt Sindhu
After fall of vritra sapt Sindhu flooded with water ( mythological glaciers fall down and flooding)
43:50. It's the fact. It's the only language which connects all of South Asia. I know Kannada, Telugu, Tamil, Hindi... It's the only language which connects the whole of South Asia. It's influence on South East Asian languages too should be considered.
That's pretty amazing
Not bro south indian no use this language you funny
@@TurboGTAHub22 I'm from South India myself. I'm from the region which borders all three states of Tamilnadu, Karnataka and Andhra
It doesn't connect tamil due to efforts of lingusitic purism and just due to the fact that tamil was never sanskrit heavy historically as well
@@plazmagaming2182The Tamil monarchs used to take up Sanskrit titles like Rajendra, Raja Raja, Sundara, etc. That itself shows that they understood the significance of Sanskrit as a connecting link in the subcontinent.
Great reaction
You're very enthusiastic & genuine person..
I appreciate ❤
Thank you! Just trying to be myself
the origins of Zoroastrians and Hindus is quite frankly the most fascinating piece of ancient history which gives us the insight into two neighboring most ancient civilizations, the start of civilization on planet earth
the earliest gathas(zoroastrian holy books) and early rigvada is more like a cultural history book than a holy book
the very names of the modern day nations the land of aryas, Iran and Bharat derive from the the ancient holy books
gatha also means story in hindi, i have heard my hindi teacher say the word gatha many times.
Gatha is a Sanskrit word. @@JodioJoestar-by8sn
Confusion of tamil being oldest language is created by politicians, tamil is older than classical sanskrit but vedic sanskrit is the oldest if we treat classical and vedic sanskrit as seperate languages
sanskrit language have i nfluence very much spread in south asia and south east asia some city still have sanskrit like even bangkok it shortfied actuaclly very long
2:03 that is one of the most badass edit I have seen
It was really good
man i've seen so many people react to indian content but you genuinely seems curious
I really am, I want to learn as much as possible
WOOW,,, got to know somthing New..!!!
Check out 'Survive the Jive' to know the authentic Indo European culture
I'll take a look at the channel
Sanskrit is love.
Pls check out part 2 whenever it will be released 😊
Definitely will, hopefully I'll understand it more when it does come out
35:26 Even I am always doubtful whether Indra is a devta or asura considered his bad qualities 😂
😂😂
18:00 pitch system is very important in sanskrit.... As all mantras have certain pitch to sing..... If mantras are read at certain pitch you can tap into different energy frequencies. You can see videos of vanaras ghat aarti... During that mantra chanting the aarti happens even in storm and nothing happens to fire.
Energies?
Great Reaction!
Thanks
Back with a new word in this video: Himstambh (Ice pillar), is made up of "hima" for snow and "Stambh" for pillar.
Now we have 3 words with "snow": Himstambh, Himālaya and Himāchal Pradesh
9:41 Lemme try to explain 😉
I chose (♾️= many)😏
1 ----> one horse
2 ----> two horses
♾️ ----> many horses
Hindi;
1 ---> ek ghoda
2 ---> do dhode
♾️ --> anek ghode
What did you found
(Horse and horses) And (ghoda and ghode) changes for only one and others while its remain same for 2 and many. like (2,3,4 horses and ♾️ horses) same as hindi but not in Sanskrit
In Sanskrit;
1 ---> ekah ashva
2 ---> dvou ashyou
♾️ ---> bahavah ashvaah
In this it changes for 1,2 and♾️
Please give me feedback you understand or not. To be honest 😜
I like ur reaction videos.. coz u not only watch it.. but also engage in to it…
Sanskrit is a very Ancient language.. would probably need 10 videos like this, if just wanna go in to surface level understanding..
I'm here to learn first and foremost so yes I want to engage and share my thoughts. It's a TH-cam video so I also need to be entertaining to an extent and that is also why I try to talk and share my own thoughts.
This is a very deep video and I know now I have so much more I need to learn
Chill Vibes
Don’t you think the theory that the Indo-European language originated in Russia is somewhat half-baked? Recent studies suggest that the Indo-European language originated in western Iran. Genetic studies have discovered a Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers component that spread to the steppe and a similar Iranian Neolithic component (in the Zagros) that spread eastward. This component was found in Bronze Age Anatolia without steppe ancestry.
The Yamnaya were roughly 1/3 CHG or Iran_Neolithic. Iran_Neolithic ancestry comprises 40-60% of all modern Indians. Don’t you think Iranian Neolithic farmers migrated toward Russia around 7,000-8,000 years ago, forming the Yamnaya culture? Perhaps these people originated from Mehrgarh or Bhirrana in the Indian subcontinent, as India and Iran were better suited for human settlement 10,000 years ago than Russia, which experienced a cold and temperate climate heavily influenced by the last Ice Age.
The cow is significant in Indo-Aryan culture. The Indo-Europeans were central to the domestication of the bull/cow, the invention of the wheeled wagon, dairying practices, and milk consumption. However, the cow was domesticated in the Indus Valley Civilization over 9,000 years ago and in Anatolia separately. If one believes the steppe people domesticated the horse and then entered India, this migration never affected the genetic lineage of Indian cow breeds. Cattle genetics conclusively prove that no admixture of Taurine cattle into India has ever occurred. It seems silly to think that Indo-Aryans came to India without a single cow.
If we look at Russia, the Proto-Uralic language formed around the same time as the Indo-European language in relatively close proximity without any connection between them. In the Caucasus region or near the Black Sea, there are unrelated Kartvelian languages that formed around the same time or earlier than Indo-European.
Do you think the Burushaski language in northern Pakistan might be related to a pre-Proto-Indo-European language, given that haplogroup R2 is significantly present among the Burusho people? Haplogroup R2 is estimated to have emerged around 15,000 years ago, likely in the Indian subcontinent, while R1 originated in Central Asia and R itself in West and South Asia. It seems likely that the Indo-European language originated in Iran, the Indus Valley, or the BMAC culture.
I think all languages stem from the middle east
@@ReldrikGeo What he says is partially true the Yamnaya that lived in Ukraine and southern Russia are a mixture of Caucasian Hunter gathers, Iranian Neolithic from south of the Caucas mountains and almost more than half it is from EHG (eastern european hunter gathers) how lives in russia and siberia. But that does not mean they came out of India more like they came from Iranic sphere surrounding the caucus mountains. The Scythians were considered to be a iranian people with reddish hair that lived in the european steppe. Phenotypically speaking contrary to 20th century fascist pseudoscience the indo-european migrations into northern europe actually made them less blond and blue eyed, the pre indo-european funnel beaker culture was more blond and eyed than current Scandinavian population. The Yamnaya/Proto indo europeans were closest in appearance to slavic people, who have mostly brown hair (before the Norse/Rus/Rurikid migrations during viking age which introduced more light flaxen hair) and might have had skin tone one or two shades darker than modern slavs.
@@clovebeans713one people travel from africa to middle to iran to india
Europian mother language is sanskrit illuminati Jews Brahmin language
I know right, you don't understand devnagri script, so you kinda missed some connections made. It's like a British guy just understands English well no matter hwo broken it is because he just _recognizes_ based on his memory.
Hey bro swatika is from the origin of sanatan,means eternal symbol...others might copied it from us😅😅😅
Tamil❤❤❤
Sanskrit❤
Its sad to say but both Christianity and Islam did the same thing. All the Neolithic Europe cultures, Celtic cultures were destroyed after the introduction of Christianity, while all middle east cultures were destroyed after the introduction of Islam.
Neolithic cultures were destroyed by the incoming indo europeans not christiantiy where tf you get your facts from. Neolithic cultures were long gone by the time christianity was even invented
Yup, a lot of pagan religions were wiped out and lost to time
@@ReldrikGeoyeh even celtic languaged only in survival who how many celtics language extinct whos knows
as buddha said attachment will only bring suffering.
@@JodioJoestar-by8snSame guy who left his wife, aged parents and new born and ran away in midnight from responsibilities?
Vedic Sanskrit was not it's real name, it's called chhando bhasha or arya bhasha, later this arya bhasha transformed into many prakrit languages, then panini made Sanskrit from arya bhasha / chhando bhasha and many prakrit languages. Later when arya bhasha/ chhando bhasha got fazed out by prakrit, Brahmins tried to and succeed in renaming chhando bhasha or arya bhasha as Sanskrit (which was latter formation).
So first there were two main languages, arya bhasha and proto-dravidian, then came prakrit and tamil languages, then Sanskrit(litrally means purified) and other later derived languages from prakrits and tamilian languages
Is there any source of what you're saying, or is it just a hypothesis?
From source I mean is there a record that it was called chhando Bhasha?
@orientalguy9462 Sanskrit dictionary
[«previous (C) next»] - Chandobhasha in Sanskrit glossary
Source: Cologne Digital Sanskrit Dictionaries: Monier-Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary
1) Chandobhāṣā (छन्दोभाषा):-[=chando-bhāṣā] [from chando > chad] f. ([gana] ṛg-ayanādi) the language of the Veda, [Taittirīya-prātiśākhya; Caraṇa-vyūha (DevīP.])
2) Chāndobhāṣa (छान्दोभाष):-[from chāndasa] mfn. [from] chando-bhāṣā [gana] ṛg-ayanādi.
@@narutouzumaki2157 bro I'm talking about can we find it from any ancient source, In which it is said that this language is chhando Bhasha or something like that.
@orientalguy9462 vedic language had no name in it's time, later when vedic language turned into prakrit languages the old vedic language remained in the verses or chhandas of vedas, it was called chandobhashha because it was the language of rig vedic verses. Then panini made Sanskrit(literally means purified) from purifying various prakrit and Chandobhasha and organising it into a proper grammatical and logical language. The later Brahmins started calling the vedic language itself as sanskrit(purified)
@@narutouzumaki2157 that's what I want to know whether people used to call that old Vedic language as chhando Bhasha or not from ancient sources? Otherwise it would just be a hypothesis.
Perfected language
Nice vedio
what this video called history of swastika by project shivoham its too good
I have watched it. The video flagged my channel as hate speech for half the year and I couldn't do anything about it to fix it.
@ReldrikGeo ohh wait i did watch you reacting to it, totally forgot....hehe keep up the good work love for you n your family🩷
Don't worry it's high for you because you're not familiar with hindi,sanskrit etc ....
But some parts of this video are high for many of us too.😅
Oh really? Well hopefully I will be able to understand it next year lol
Samskrutham.
The problem with sanskrit is that many ppl idolize it and many despise it because nature of colonialism and castism that we have lost meaning of appreciating the beauty of each other culture and also the way tribalism has induced within us has made it very difficult to learn about our history. Nowadays everything is controversial and we cannot learn for sake of learning about cultures.
I'm not seeing anything wrong with idolising sanskrit thou..
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o Its wrong in the sense ppl will make it as if everything started with sanskrit and false sense of superiority within mass. This will create more tribalism and hate with others.
Sanskrit does seem important to many languages and cultures though so I think it's okay to appreciate it for this fact alone
@@saurabhnikam6300 still better than dravidian nationalism..
My opinion so don get mad
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o bro im not even Dravidian. This why indians are easy to manipulate because we assume things that others are dravidian , north indian, east indian etc. I just wanna say just appreciate culture dont idolize or become zombie for it. If someone hates your culture you just tell them the truth no need to do whataboutery
Tamil is an older spoken language than Sanskrit. Records of the Tamil language date to the third century BCE and records of the Sanskrit language date to the second century BCE. Tamil is still in everyday use today, but Sanskrit died out around 600 BCE and is used for mainly religious and literature purposes today.
Sanskrit is older but it's dead considerd but Tamil is alive not older than Sanskrit but it's the oldest alive language...hope this helps to clear confusion.. both language have words from each other it's connected
Both are our old language proud on both of languages 🕉️♥️
No way.
Tamil is contemporary to classical Sanskrit but VEDIC SANSKRIT is much older than Tamil.
50:37 (,I guess you will see)
Just letting you know that I liked it 😁
Oh good, thank you
sir in the video your reacting is showing dislike count how
I have an extension that shows it, you can download it on desktop
Fact correction "vedas are not written or constructed in 500-1500 BCE. " They are much older than that. It preserves astronomical records far back from 70k+ years which are in no way could be known by human in 500-1500BCE. Of course Vedas or any other texts from sanskriti were passed on to generation by verbal means as those were only way it could be preserved. "Books can perish. Take invasion for example. Khilji burned whole library"..... It's just that only available ancient copies of vedas are written in 500-1500 BCE. It's a misconception and very ignorantly foolish of western scholars(are they really? These racist clasists?) To think that vedas are from 1500 BCE
One more comment for algorithm
Thank you
Islam is a conquest, ppl might dislike my take but it is how Islam spread in west Asia, although in Arab nations they needed to, cuz it was all waring tribes and Suads needed to get power
Well yeah, it's written in the abrahamic religion texts to spread their religion as much as possible
please react on the downfall of bengal in your playlist
Reaction on Dr Ankit Shah's de-dollaristaion you'll know about why western civilization facing such problems in your last videos ....
Bro sanatan dharma means etranal religion
Thank you
@ReldrikGeo if you want to know about Sanatan Dharma I will recommend you some of vedioes
Hey can you also please react to the Telugu video as well.
Can you react to video on telugu from the same channel
Sure, I believe it's in my list
Vedas r more than 50000 yrs old..
There r astronomical descriptions given in Vedas which takes back to more than 50000 yrs old
Yeah I believe it. I believe a lot of our history is shrouded or lost to records
Hindu says earth is flat
Isn't that just to represent our dimensional plane? Also I thought I read many things showing Hinduism talks about the earth being round
please belive it, until see it your own eys
You want me to believe the earth is flat until I see otherwise with my own eyes?
Old Sanskrit text said Earth is round. Arya bhat also said earth is round in 5 th century. भूगोल... means ..Round shape of Earth ❤❤❤
naruto is fiction based on hinduism
It's based on Shintoism but it does draw from other things like Hinduism and Buddhism
First 🥇🐻
Nice
I am a Tamilian and there is NO definitive proof of which is older Tamil or Sanskrit. Both sides should stop trying to claim to be the oldest without substantial proof.. Both are some of the oldest in the world thats enough for now.
Yeah the fact that tamil is 5,000+ yrs old is just fascinating. Has it not changed during the course of time? Anyways I will be learning the language for sure in the future to contribute towards conserving tamil language.
Tamil is child baby of Malayalam
@@perryhandiqueshorts2364 There is NO proof of current Tamil 5000 years ago.. Dont just blabber anything.. What they estimate is proto Dravidian as being possibly 5000 years ago.
@@SandeepYadav-gx3nj its literally the reverse fool
Finally a rational Tamilian
Tamil is the oldest language
Yeah it's the oldest living language now isn't it? It's one of the main reasons I want to learn it
Well sanskrit or samskrutham is an Indian language and languages that are Influenced by it are indo-european. Think about it according to puranas migration happened outwards from india not inwards.
You are referring to the out of india theory...Another hindu nationalist i see...
Tamil is second oldest after Sanskrit..
Funfact- tamil also is a Indian language
It not, it just spoken by indians, also belong to srilanka as well so it not just belong to india, no one proved sanskrit is older than tamizh, either way.
@@suryasuryaks6653people get confuse, vedic sanskrit is older than tamizh but classical sanskrit isn't. The correct sentence many experts say is Tamizh is oldest "living" language. People often neglect the world living and just say oldest language. linguistics definitely say Sanskrit (Vedic) is older than Tamil.❤
Both are great languages of India and they influenced languages in other countries too❤
abe pahle vedio dekh le phir reaction kar lena
That's not how I do things