Zen can't understand Richard's answer when richard answered his question about 9th term abortions, and so he kept asking it. Zen also can't understand the difference between being recognised as a citizen by the state and being recognised as a human by the state.
Richard bringing up conquest and history won him the debate. Human rights don't exist without an order of people to enforce such things. People like Zen who are passionate about these rights should prioritize preserving the West rather than the rights themselves as the West is the only civilization who has recognized these rights into their legal systems. He should've stressed harder the eugenic outlook that no abortion/birth control would increase the third world mindset/population and lead us to a non liberal society that truly wont care about "human rights".
They’re looking for an identity and latch onto the trend of the week. In truth though the real religion that calls out to the mystery meat man is Islam
Avoiding questions by simply saying they're preposterous without elaborating is not a good look for Richard. The thing I've noticed when he debates is that he can yap a lot, and can explain his position carefully, but he struggles when engaging with other person's arguments. I don't think Richard won this one.
He tried to elaborate multiple times but the mouth breather couldn’t understand. People with low IQ require a very rigid black/white, good/evil, on/off, 0/1 worldview. They might be robots but not even the cool kind, more like a toaster with only two settings.
![PURPEECH - นี่ฉันเองคนที่... (It's me) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NuhHd0hOOg8/mqdefault.jpg)
RS saying "Chad woohoo human rights bro!" Killed me ahaha 😂
lol Richard I’m sorry you had to talk to this guy :,(
I’m trying to comment on Zen Shapiro, but TH-cam guidelines keep reminding me that I’m being unacceptably rude
I’ve never felt for Spencer so much. This guy sucks
Zen can't understand Richard's answer when richard answered his question about 9th term abortions, and so he kept asking it.
Zen also can't understand the difference between being recognised as a citizen by the state and being recognised as a human by the state.
Spencer won
It’s hard to imagine Richard and Zen are speaking at the same speed setting
Richard bringing up conquest and history won him the debate. Human rights don't exist without an order of people to enforce such things. People like Zen who are passionate about these rights should prioritize preserving the West rather than the rights themselves as the West is the only civilization who has recognized these rights into their legal systems. He should've stressed harder the eugenic outlook that no abortion/birth control would increase the third world mindset/population and lead us to a non liberal society that truly wont care about "human rights".
Why are so many orthobros mystery meat?
Modern Christianity ignores the racial question.
They’re looking for an identity and latch onto the trend of the week. In truth though the real religion that calls out to the mystery meat man is Islam
brooo youre coping
brooooooo
Stop coping bro
yooooooooo LFG ☦️
Avoiding questions by simply saying they're preposterous without elaborating is not a good look for Richard. The thing I've noticed when he debates is that he can yap a lot, and can explain his position carefully, but he struggles when engaging with other person's arguments. I don't think Richard won this one.
He tried to elaborate multiple times but the mouth breather couldn’t understand. People with low IQ require a very rigid black/white, good/evil, on/off, 0/1 worldview.
They might be robots but not even the cool kind, more like a toaster with only two settings.
This reminds of of the Dave Smith vs Andrew Wilson debate. If you can't get past the underlying philosophy, then you have lost.
forget how to read immediately
I’m going to have to call this one a draw.
No.. Total Richard W
Could’ve avoided a Richard W if Zen wasn’t such an unlikable sperg
Richard L