accept for the fact that the DOT is actually supporting the concept of self driving cars. www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/technology/self-driving-cars-guidelines.html?_r=0
Honestly tho...my dad is a taxi driver and it's like ruining his life cuz he might have to find a another job soon :/ I hate seeing him stress out about this.
Wipe yo self off man, you ded. "Since 2012, the self-driving cars tested by Google, Delphi and Audi have logged more than a million miles on public roads, and have been involved in 11 accidents. By comparison, researchers say there were 5.7 million police-reported crashes involving all vehicles in the U.S. in 2013. ‹"
and those self-driving cars all had human backup drivers. how many times was an accident prevented because the human driver took control? do you think Google has accurately reported that information?
The point is Uber's incredibly cavalier attitude to everything. They are not a responsible company and are likely to damage the delicate confidence that people may have in driverless technology
Hey Charles I'm Mark with the Fox affiliate in Los Angeles. We will be using this video for our primetime telecast and will not be giving you credit. Thanks for posting this!
Eliza Gilliam company policy. We do not give credit for videos we feature on our prime time broadcast. If he would like us to give him credit then we charge $500 for every 5 seconds we use on air.
longliveBDS pak35 hahaha that water tech sucks! that's why it's not being mass produced in India.. let's face it. America whoops your ass in every way..
Brandon Walker Just for the record... you think teaching homosexuality is acceptable and not killing innocent people is despicable? After all, those are two things the Radical Muslim world definitely does not do.
Jake Smith I think you are the "fuckface". Pause the video at 0:10... do you not see the fucking hands on the wheel? Learn to use your eyes before you speak. Fucking ignorant dumbass
People still have to be at the wheel though.... just because the car is self driving doesn't mean no one is in the driver's seat ready to take over if needed.
Lol, all these people are about to just take the posters word for it and assume the cars not being actively driven by a human while it goes through the light without research.
*****[[Actually, a logical person would be skeptical of things they see before assuming it's true.]] A logical person doesn't have to be skeptical but unbiased towards the likely possibility. [[It doesn't make much sense to assume that something is true due to the lack of evidence against it.]] That is how you deal with evidence. For example a claim stands unless there is a contrary claim. You consider which one of them is more consistent to the given scenario. One does not arbitrarily impose a bias against the possibility for the express chance that it might be true. You impose bias when an indication to the contrary or an inconsistency to the likelihood arises. To impose doubt or bias in an arbitrary manner gives rise to a number of logical fallacies.
*****[[With your logic, a claim that there is a God will always be assumed true because it's something that can't be disproven.]] It is false that you can't prove a negative. You can disprove the claim that there are no lions in Africa. We can prove that there are no Muslims in the U.S. Senate. So you are wrong that my logic would say you cannot disprove God because as I have demonstrated, it is possible to disprove a negative statement. Concerning doubt or bias in evidence * Aristotiles Dictum indicates the same with literary critiques. ". The benefit of the doubt is to be given to the document itself, not assigned by the critic to himself." This means that you cannot disavow a claim by simple bias but that the claim stands until an inconsistency or contradiction can be demonstrated. I can provide further elaboration on this by scholars such as Greenleaf who expand on this principle when dealing with evidence.
***** Actually you are doing the ignoring and calling fluff what you don't like. I was dealing with the same issue and further elaborated and demonstrated my claim. At no point did you refute my claim nor given a logical fallacy by name against any one of my claims. I have addressed the issue at hand. You are the one who brought up fluff then claimed it is my logic and also claimed what I would claim. I directly addressed and even now clarify that it isn't reasonable to arbitrarily be skeptical. You are complicating things because of the possibility that your bias is wrong. Your bias is based on your own perceptions as opposed to direct evidence. This doesn't change even if you restate it again and claim it is false. Deal with the issue at hand.
Brian Mi Actually I was not disputing liability. I am disputing that arbitrary bias is not a reasonable unless there is indication to the contrary. Since I didn't make a claim about worse drivers, I would say you are committing a straw man fallacy. You then proceeded to beat up the very straw man argument that you erected.
AleVids There's already been a few Tesla accidents and one death using auto pilot mode...self driving cars in general are dangerous because the computer can miss things only a human can see regardless of how stupid some drivers are lol
Yeah there's been accidents, and a death because of auto pilot but it's because people are stupid, and don't use it the way it's supposed to be done. Each crash from tesla has been proven to be the drivers fault.
you know how many deaths happen every day because of texting or eating or just not paying attention. At least the computer is always looking at the road
Member berries That's why they save gas & are more "efficient"! Statistically, a human would eventually cause a wreck or harm someone, but #Uber can tell if the potential hazards are there. #FuckTheRedLight? 😂
I see in these comments, people jumping to conclusions, as did the cab driver. This is what happens when you don't research what you are seeing. #1 The vehicles are not "Driverless". They have a human behind the wheel during this testing phase. The driver can take over, and override the set vehicle commands at any time. This means that one possibility is that the "tester" said "screw that" and made the human decision to run the light. #2 While it is illegal to run a red light, if you are traveling at a certain speed, and the light turns while you are approaching the intersection, it is actually more dangerous to stop than it is to run the red light. Remember, the crossing lanes lights do not turn immediately when your light goes red. It takes a couple of seconds to allow someone in this situation the ability to pass through without putting others in danger. If an officer see's this, they usually take care of it on a case by case basis and will give a citation, a warning, or ignore it, again, case by case, and up to the officers discretion. #3 You can't really fault the cab drivers and cab companies to look for, exaggerate, and even ignore commonly known and followed laws to find flaws in their competition. They, are of course in competition. They've been fighting Uber, Lyft, and other services like them for a while now. They won't be updating their cabs any time soon, and will of course feel the need to continue the fight against a competitor who they feel is stealing money from them. #4 While there can be flaws in any programming system, you still need to take other things into account, such as what would human reaction be in the exact same situation. The easiest way to see if there was a malfunction in the vehicles operating system, or if it was overridden, is to look into the logs of the vehicle for this exact time. If there is a true and thorough test happening, then all this should be in the logs. Remember, even though Emergency Vehicles are not automated, they keep logs. At least most modern Police Vehicles do. They have a little "black box" almost like airplanes, that will record speed, if and when the brakes, turn signals, sirens, etc. are being used. This information comes in handy if an officer is ever involved in an accident while in their vehicle. I'm assuming Uber would be using something similar in their vehicles to log this testing, so as of now, I am looking at this with skepticism, and considering this an unconfirmed claim.
yeah just like the telsa driver who was paying attention on the freeway and died. STFU honestly. U have no idea what happened anymore than the person who filmed this shit
You spy on me is probably one of those lamers who drives around all day with his phone right in front of his dash and a big uber sticker on his windshield. Go get a real job u bum or maybe become a legal taxi driver
The cars have sensors that make them stop when self-driving and something obstructs the road. Even if there's no map data at all. It can see in 3 dimensions using multiple sensors and cameras, which is how it knows to stop before hitting cars in front of it too. It looks at the sides and straight too, so this car would know to stop before a contact occurred, barring special circumstances. ...except if the human driver took control. Which may be the reason this car ran the light in the first place. The human driver may have decided to take control and safely (though illegally) chose to run the red light, since it was a pedestrian intersection only, and nobody was close enough on the crosswalk to be at risk (by the driver's estimation). The self-driving cars are usually *very* good at recognizing stoplights, so it would be odd if this actually was ignored while the system was in control.
JJcool How am I an idiot? Uber literally just announced that there was a person driving the vehicle, hence "user-error" so this video is click-bait and fake news.
I agree this video is fucking clickbait,The car didn't Stop at previous Red signal but stopped at next signal so yeah the human driving the car not the machine cuz in this case the car should hit other vehicles.
catindabox 334 Haha, right.. Sadly.. this newer generation wants to be offended all the time.. You can't make a joke anymore without people crying.. Lots of famous stand-ups refuse to perform in front of younger audiences because they get offended by everything.
ramsy51 The software doesn't need to drive perfectly. All it needs to do is drive better than the average human, thus saving more lives overall. Anyone who argues that it must be perfect before we use it has a total disregard for human life. If it is better than humans, then we have a moral obligation to switch over to driverless as quickly as possible.
I am gonna guess this is human error. I am around these cars all the time in Pittsburgh, and never once have I seen them doing anything funky much less run a red light.
No what I believe what he means is that the since the car still has a driver and engineer inside which can take control of the vehicle at anytime, that perhaps it could have been the human driver's fault for running the light.
Heh, this isn't the 80s. The code running on that thing isn't monolithic. You could write code for an AI project primarily with IF statements but you will go crazy before you complete the project.
From what I understand, there IS a driver behind the steering wheel, but the car can be driven by itself (just like a tesla). So you're telling me these drivers just sit there (or even sleep) when I'm riding at the back?
greentealatte No, I don't know how people got this notion that these cars are "self-driving". They aren't fully autonomous, the tech is still in "beta-testing", if you will. It uses basic sensor technology and satellite mapping, yet if driver is asleep or anything goes wrong it's not the techs fault, it's never is since there is literally a warning saying "tech is still in prototype phase, don't rely on it %100, you still need to be aware as the driver"
for the record, you should never sleep behind the wheel of a moving vehicle. I don't care how advanced it is, there will be times that you have to manually override to prevent an accident.
+Roi Goes to Hollywood In the future people won't "own" cars. All vehicles will be shared as you need a ride. No need for great big parking lots anywhere as the cars keep rolling 24/7 from one need to the next. All re-fueling/service is done by "the company" {state?} and you get billed {if at all} once a month. It does mean that there will only really need to be ONE design. {After all, one-size fits all. Right?}
Hi Charles, I'm Dr. Travis Stork with the The Doctors in Los Angeles. I am typing to let you know we will be discussing the new uber self-driving car and also be featuring this clip in an upcoming episode of The Doctors. We will not be giving you any credit whatsoever. Thanks for posting this video!
that's grand and all but here in the south no body uses cross walks and nobody gives a fuck if you run a red light unless a cop is all out of ideas and bored with just sitting in the car.
Reddit Gold™ user here with a /r/STEM degree. Based on my periodic browsing of /r/engineering, I can confirm that the car ran a red traffic signal. Please be patient while I have my best /r/memeengineers work on figuring out the bug. Thanks! Yours, Justin Memer
Hi Charles. I'm with RT America, an international news outlet. We were wondering if we could use your video on our platforms with credit to you. Thank you!
The better way to credit the cab industry is not by discrediting Uber. It's by competing on merit. Give your riders clean, comfortable, well-maintained cars. Drivers that are friendly, well-dressed and have good hygiene. Methods of hailing a ride, and paying for the ride that are quick and easy. Means for getting help should any problem arise, and the willingness to solve those problems. Is this too much to ask?
Uber doesn't have a permit to use completely driverless cars. There was a human driving this car that ran the light and this car isn't even part of their pilot where the driver let's the car take over. This is nothing but a smear job by some bitter cab company. This is probably the first light the cabbie stopped at all day.
Hi Charles. Nick from Australian news site nine.com.au here. Is it okay if we run this video on our platforms? We'll make sure to attribute you. Thanks.
Uber is telling me this isn't a driverless vehicle, dude. It's a mapping vehicle that has a driver. The time-stamp on the video says November 28. Driverless vehicles weren't even on the road yet.
I don't see the problem here. The car was only imitating a real taxi driver...
That is very true...
Huzufu LMAO true as fuck bro, especially in big cities.
accept for the fact that the DOT is actually supporting the concept of self driving cars. www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/technology/self-driving-cars-guidelines.html?_r=0
Matteo C fool ass this is youtube not farmersonly.com foh wit yo thirsty ass
Hahaha, never expected this to get so many likes!
That guy walking missed a chance at bucket loads of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
as soon as I see a driver less car I'm getting hit
right on, bro.
+Sugar.Starch massive lawsuit
he might 10 grand but is it worth his legs or the pain if the crash
+DIY BRO 10 grand ? lmao more like a couple hundred Uber is a multi million dollar corporation
Cop: "Sir, show me you licen-, God Damn it! not again!!"
Global Critic. lol, 10/10 Imdb Comedy
Global Critic Rotten Tomatoes: 100%
Underrated comment
Uber should be ashamed of itself. Valuing money over lives. DISGUSTING. Never taking Uber again.
Synth voice: Uber need pee really bad, late for work... (computer generated sobbing)...
Wonder how confused a cop would be if he tried to pull it over and give it a ticket 😂
TheDax714 self driving uber car leads police on high speed chase!
lol I would like to see that XD
There is an operator in the car so not that hard to do.
Did you just assume this hypothetical cops gender?!?!?!
Crimson_Tango triggered
A salty taxi driver filmed this...
YES haha
TITA & MEEKIE the robots rr takin r juubbbbs!!!🤖🤖🤖
Honestly tho...my dad is a taxi driver and it's like ruining his life cuz he might have to find a another job soon :/ I hate seeing him stress out about this.
To show the truth behind the hype, obviously.
Mildly discomforted planeaviators Cant he just become an uber driver?
Uber mistake.
Diesel Review this deserves more likes
I see what you did there :)
stolen
I'm pretty sure the AI is still better than 75% of drivers in the U.S.
Wipe yo self off man, you ded. "Since 2012, the self-driving cars tested by Google, Delphi and Audi have logged more than a million miles on public roads, and have been involved in 11 accidents. By comparison, researchers say there were 5.7 million police-reported crashes involving all vehicles in the U.S. in 2013. ‹"
TheHydraKing And twice as good as all Russian drivers
Fernando N This. They don't understand the technology and they base everything they know about artificial intelligence off of movies.
and those self-driving cars all had human backup drivers. how many times was an accident prevented because the human driver took control? do you think Google has accurately reported that information?
Wipe yo self off man, you ded. Someone cut in front of me and I had to hit the brakes so hard that my car went into neutral
1 car made 1 mistake, think of the billions of mistakes humans have made while driving (for anyone who thinks self driving cars are dangerous)
The point is Uber's incredibly cavalier attitude to everything. They are not a responsible company and are likely to damage the delicate confidence that people may have in driverless technology
BE sure to download LYFT and use promo code TEXSTATE for TEN FREE RIDES!!!
kinda sucks to get millions of people out of jobs don't you think? you say one problem but i see millions of people out of work
Gifford Oppatumis still
It's not that they change lanes too fast. The problem is as humans we are too slow in comparison.
Don't let Will Smith see this...
Lmaoo
or even worse, jaden smith
I don't get it
LOL!!
Randy Marsh watch irobot
Hey Charles I'm Mark with the Fox affiliate in Los Angeles. We will be using this video for our primetime telecast and will not be giving you credit. Thanks for posting this!
DrGodfather14 Haaaa got eem. Get them views.
Credit Luxor Cab San Francisco
Charles Rotter sorry Charles, we will not be giving credit.
DrGodfather14 so why are you telling him?
Eliza Gilliam company policy. We do not give credit for videos we feature on our prime time broadcast. If he would like us to give him credit then we charge $500 for every 5 seconds we use on air.
I imagine this was a female AI.
Not funny
Laura Sanchez Actually it's very funny
Laura Sanchez TRIGGERED
Laura Sanchez it's not funny, it's hilarious.
StrikePlaysGames It's not
When a Tesla Model 3 says "nobody's home"......
xDDD
AMA it's a Volvo. Are you blind?
***** So? Ever heard of interracial relationships?
AMA right
***** Humans are more prone to failure and emotional distress. An automated computer will follow orders without failure.
This is trending right next to a video advertising it.
Shredder For me a Lyft ad appeared...
Shredder by design. TH-cam is Satan worshippy like that
Shredder lol this one is right on top of the self uber ad on trending
lol
Needs to Trend with a Video of Trump Banning all Driverless Cars that Steal Jobs.
Hi Charles, I wanna show this to my mom, can I credit you when I tell her about it?
Plebeian+ lol
LOOOOOOOOOOL
that made ma laugh
LMAO So true!
Plebeian+ I lol'ed so hard
omg that's funny. made my day. ty
Looks like the fossil fuel industry is scared of the new car technology coming out.
longliveBDS pak35 hahaha that water tech sucks! that's why it's not being mass produced in India.. let's face it. America whoops your ass in every way..
Brandon Walker Just for the record... you think teaching homosexuality is acceptable and not killing innocent people is despicable? After all, those are two things the Radical Muslim world definitely does not do.
What's that got to do with anything lmao
I can't believe people are stupid enough to believe the car was actually auto drive... someone was in there ffs
Pizza delivery? XD
prepaid pizza
But then again, a person didn't drive a Tesla into a truck ;)
To be in a auto driving uber, you still must be in the drivers seat but dont have to drive.
Jake Smith I think you are the "fuckface". Pause the video at 0:10... do you not see the fucking hands on the wheel? Learn to use your eyes before you speak. Fucking ignorant dumbass
fucking lag man
weezyheezy ping was too high
weezyheezy Yeah, Corner Stores aren't really wi-fi producers, are they?
It's gonna freak me out when I'm at a light, look at the car to the right and see no one driving
Shredding Stuff lol but its gunna run it
hell ya
samsies
lol
People still have to be at the wheel though.... just because the car is self driving doesn't mean no one is in the driver's seat ready to take over if needed.
How do you know someone wasn't driving it manually? Lol.
Rob because of the top roof is for the driverless car in ubers new video
'cos they would have stopped....probably
Yes, but driver-less cars still have the option of being driven by a person...Humans run red lights all the time. There is no proof here.
Jagster104 all driverless cars can be manually driven
But then they wouldn't be driverless, you've just created a Catch-22 situation Zachary!
I wonder how these cars will behave in the snow or ice roads.
Or a heavy downpour or fog. I assume they will not stop when a rock falls from above, like a human would (Hwy 1).
I can already picture them slidding down the road and hitting someone....
zomski101 people drive like retards on snow too though. Just search winter car crashes and you'll get a million.
zomski101 4 cones won't be enough
Jerrad Grinstead we aren't causing any accidents here...
Hi Charles. Can we use your video in our newscast and online with proper credit to you? And what part of SF was this video taken?
that's pretty obviously SFMoma. The iconic building even says SFMoma on it.
How much are you offering? Don't take anything under $50 Charles.
Credit Luxor Cab San Francisco
GET OFF MY INTERNET ASJFHSDUHBRSWEHFUIWAZNDENOS; REREEEWEUYEWEEEKE
Thanks
its good uber pays the fine and i reach my destination fast 👌
Unless you get hit
Then look both ways when you cross the street.
scribble does Uber have a funeral expense fund?
ZeeshanFoxTM you will reach your destination at the speed limit
You could say " Freeze All Motor Functions" to solve the problem lol
Abdul Gh Nice reference lol
have you ever questioned the nature of your reality?
Doesn't look like anything to me
Where is the center of the maze?
Who's paying that red light ticket tho? 😂😂😂
"Well, technically... no one ran the light."
James Burgess Uber would.
I would think the person behind the wheel.
The operator is responsible for what their machines do, whether they were directly in control or not.
Lol, all these people are about to just take the posters word for it and assume the cars not being actively driven by a human while it goes through the light without research.
Usually, that is how it stands unless some indication to the contrary arises. No reason to arbitrarily assume it is fake with no indication at all.
*****[[Actually, a logical person would be skeptical of things they see before assuming it's true.]] A logical person doesn't have to be skeptical but unbiased towards the likely possibility.
[[It doesn't make much sense to assume that something is true due to the lack of evidence against it.]] That is how you deal with evidence. For example a claim stands unless there is a contrary claim. You consider which one of them is more consistent to the given scenario. One does not arbitrarily impose a bias against the possibility for the express chance that it might be true. You impose bias when an indication to the contrary or an inconsistency to the likelihood arises. To impose doubt or bias in an arbitrary manner gives rise to a number of logical fallacies.
*****[[With your logic, a claim that there is a God will always be assumed true because it's something that can't be disproven.]] It is false that you can't prove a negative. You can disprove the claim that there are no lions in Africa. We can prove that there are no Muslims in the U.S. Senate. So you are wrong that my logic would say you cannot disprove God because as I have demonstrated, it is possible to disprove a negative statement.
Concerning doubt or bias in evidence * Aristotiles Dictum indicates the same with literary critiques. ". The benefit of the doubt is to be given to the document itself, not assigned by the critic to himself." This means that you cannot disavow a claim by simple bias but that the claim stands until an inconsistency or contradiction can be demonstrated. I can provide further elaboration on this by scholars such as Greenleaf who expand on this principle when dealing with evidence.
*****
Actually you are doing the ignoring and calling fluff what you don't like. I was dealing with the same issue and further elaborated and demonstrated my claim. At no point did you refute my claim nor given a logical fallacy by name against any one of my claims. I have addressed the issue at hand. You are the one who brought up fluff then claimed it is my logic and also claimed what I would claim.
I directly addressed and even now clarify that it isn't reasonable to arbitrarily be skeptical. You are complicating things because of the possibility that your bias is wrong. Your bias is based on your own perceptions as opposed to direct evidence. This doesn't change even if you restate it again and claim it is false. Deal with the issue at hand.
Brian Mi
Actually I was not disputing liability. I am disputing that arbitrary bias is not a reasonable unless there is indication to the contrary. Since I didn't make a claim about worse drivers, I would say you are committing a straw man fallacy. You then proceeded to beat up the very straw man argument that you erected.
Since when is there driverless Uber cars? I wouldn't trust any other autonomous car other than tesla and Google to be on the road
AleVids There's already been a few Tesla accidents and one death using auto pilot mode...self driving cars in general are dangerous because the computer can miss things only a human can see regardless of how stupid some drivers are lol
Yeah there's been accidents, and a death because of auto pilot but it's because people are stupid, and don't use it the way it's supposed to be done.
Each crash from tesla has been proven to be the drivers fault.
AleVids I wouldn't trust ANY self driving car and if one was ever responsible for my accident they'd be getting sued out the ass
ReaIDeaI1 say that again, I hope one of those cars hit me one day.
you know how many deaths happen every day because of texting or eating or just not paying attention. At least the computer is always looking at the road
Uber: what is my purpose?
Rick: you run red lights.
Member berries Uber: Oh my gosh
Uber: What if there is a cop next to me?
He can't give you a ticket so who cares....oh and um... 100 points if you hit a person
......
Member berries
That's why they save gas
& are more "efficient"!
Statistically, a human
would eventually cause
a wreck or harm someone,
but #Uber can tell if the
potential hazards are there.
#FuckTheRedLight? 😂
Member berries My name is Rick Harrison, and this is my pawn shop!
"Welcome to the club, pal"
The future is here and it still doesn't work as advertised
How do you know that it wasn't being driven manually?
Zeno Blues says the person that doesn't even know what JAVA is
It's being tested you idiot. Only Google, Tesla and Mercedes make good self driving software. Uber ain't there yet.
Zeno Blues The car works fine. It was being manually operated
I'm just making light of the situation personally I feel people get so excited for the next big they forget it always has problems at first
I see in these comments, people jumping to conclusions, as did the cab driver. This is what happens when you don't research what you are seeing.
#1 The vehicles are not "Driverless". They have a human behind the wheel during this testing phase. The driver can take over, and override the set vehicle commands at any time. This means that one possibility is that the "tester" said "screw that" and made the human decision to run the light.
#2 While it is illegal to run a red light, if you are traveling at a certain speed, and the light turns while you are approaching the intersection, it is actually more dangerous to stop than it is to run the red light. Remember, the crossing lanes lights do not turn immediately when your light goes red. It takes a couple of seconds to allow someone in this situation the ability to pass through without putting others in danger. If an officer see's this, they usually take care of it on a case by case basis and will give a citation, a warning, or ignore it, again, case by case, and up to the officers discretion.
#3 You can't really fault the cab drivers and cab companies to look for, exaggerate, and even ignore commonly known and followed laws to find flaws in their competition. They, are of course in competition. They've been fighting Uber, Lyft, and other services like them for a while now. They won't be updating their cabs any time soon, and will of course feel the need to continue the fight against a competitor who they feel is stealing money from them.
#4 While there can be flaws in any programming system, you still need to take other things into account, such as what would human reaction be in the exact same situation. The easiest way to see if there was a malfunction in the vehicles operating system, or if it was overridden, is to look into the logs of the vehicle for this exact time. If there is a true and thorough test happening, then all this should be in the logs. Remember, even though Emergency Vehicles are not automated, they keep logs. At least most modern Police Vehicles do. They have a little "black box" almost like airplanes, that will record speed, if and when the brakes, turn signals, sirens, etc. are being used. This information comes in handy if an officer is ever involved in an accident while in their vehicle.
I'm assuming Uber would be using something similar in their vehicles to log this testing, so as of now, I am looking at this with skepticism, and considering this an unconfirmed claim.
yeah just like the telsa driver who was paying attention on the freeway and died. STFU honestly. U have no idea what happened anymore than the person who filmed this shit
You Spy On Me nigga a cop would never give a warning for running a red wtf
You Spy On Me and this comment was sponsored by Uber😂
You spy on me is probably one of those lamers who drives around all day with his phone right in front of his dash and a big uber sticker on his windshield. Go get a real job u bum or maybe become a legal taxi driver
Number 2 is not relevant in this case. He was driving super slow, and I don't think he was driving any faster before the light with this slow traffic
More shocking than the traffic infraction is the video not being in at least 720p and 16:9 aspect ratio. It's 2016, for Fuck's sake.
Dean Fuller maybe its taken from a dashcam that only supports up to 480p?
JustAGuy well obviously.
Ashwin Gautam I'm 47.
What would be the point of having a HD dash cam anyway, you realize that a days worth of driving probably takes up a lot of memory.
Majority Hippo Most have continuous loop. You only really need the past 20 minutes or so anyway, in the event of accident or other claim.
That man was lucky, looks like the pedestrian stop isn't on their database.
The cars have sensors that make them stop when self-driving and something obstructs the road. Even if there's no map data at all. It can see in 3 dimensions using multiple sensors and cameras, which is how it knows to stop before hitting cars in front of it too. It looks at the sides and straight too, so this car would know to stop before a contact occurred, barring special circumstances.
...except if the human driver took control. Which may be the reason this car ran the light in the first place. The human driver may have decided to take control and safely (though illegally) chose to run the red light, since it was a pedestrian intersection only, and nobody was close enough on the crosswalk to be at risk (by the driver's estimation). The self-driving cars are usually *very* good at recognizing stoplights, so it would be odd if this actually was ignored while the system was in control.
You assume that just because it had the hardware on top of it that it is an Uber and you assumed that it was driving by itself. You'd be wrong.
Macario Patrick you're an idiot
JJcool How am I an idiot? Uber literally just announced that there was a person driving the vehicle, hence "user-error" so this video is click-bait and fake news.
Macario Patrick Uber Would do anything to save their company
***** Thank you
I agree this video is fucking clickbait,The car didn't Stop at previous Red signal but stopped at next signal so yeah the human driving the car not the machine cuz in this case the car should hit other vehicles.
Still a better driver than the _____. (Gotta keep it "PC" for the millenials)
Top10Archive stfu
I think you mean special snowflakes... and no I doubt whatever you were going to say is that bad and you shouldn't give a shit what they think.
Top10Archive ...what?
The Totally Creative And Generic TH-cam name Andddd looks like we found our first millennial.
catindabox 334 Haha, right.. Sadly.. this newer generation wants to be offended all the time.. You can't make a joke anymore without people crying.. Lots of famous stand-ups refuse to perform in front of younger audiences because they get offended by everything.
I like how this is trending right above a video promoting it.
It is the 1st model of course there are going to be issues
PhineasAndFerbPinky but that's unacceptable. if someone gets killed, who takes the responsibility?
PhineasAndFerbPinky that's a really dangerous issue
Except its not the first model.
The Company that made the car
That is why they have people test it first
I believe that cars should take a driving test before they just throw it on the road.
Erick Rod they are tested
DMV behind the wheel?
All self-driving cars are rigorously tested before they get on the road
Except Uber decided they would start this service without bothering to get a permit. They have now been ordered to stop
Old Uncle Silas
Oops. How embarrassing
come the fuck on a 35 second ad. the video is literally shorter
Orion Durdaller get TH-cam red then bro
Jrizzle Productshizzle
Or get Adblock.
Need adblock on mobile, guys. Not everyone slouches on their desktop all day.
+Jrizzle Productshizzle Only idiots that have money to waste buy TH-cam red.
Not having money to waste is a much greater indicator of one being an idiot.
Maybe its so Aware, that it doesnt need silly traffic lights
Interesting point
Lol valid point XD That plus it knows it can't get a ticket XD
Why are people disliking lol, it's not the uploaders fault
It has transcended human laws and now drives more efficiently. :P
Everyones complaining about this but humans run red lights all the fucking time
7homPsoN the whole point of it though is to create the perfect self driving tech.
7homPsoN and this is another example of that cause a human was driving it
ramsy51 The software doesn't need to drive perfectly. All it needs to do is drive better than the average human, thus saving more lives overall. Anyone who argues that it must be perfect before we use it has a total disregard for human life. If it is better than humans, then we have a moral obligation to switch over to driverless as quickly as possible.
humans do it on purpose... computer didnt know a red light is in front of it whats to say it wont drive off a cliff....
chevy the computer wasn't driving that car a human was
Just like a real SF driver!
Uber says it was humans driving and not the car. The drivers have been suspended.
Finally AI learned how to act like real drivers in Jew York
really? what is your problem?
this is in SF troll
"San Francisco, your self-driving Uber is arriving now!"....... Now I know why they disabled the comments lmao!
I am gonna guess this is human error. I am around these cars all the time in Pittsburgh, and never once have I seen them doing anything funky much less run a red light.
Maybe. Its a pedestrian redlight so there is no real intersection. Here is the exact location in SF. goo.gl/maps/zY2UfiiAGDw
Oh shit DoctaM3!!!!
drew138 so you mean like the car was programmed to continue to drive thru here because it's not a registered Intersection?
No what I believe what he means is that the since the car still has a driver and engineer inside which can take control of the vehicle at anytime, that perhaps it could have been the human driver's fault for running the light.
xmods4Reel No, he was talking to drew138 and he understood completely...
It's just become street-smart and realize everyone else is running the red light too...
Ha! This is now higher than the Self-Driving Uber Ad in the trending section.
Terrible timing, it was probably the operators fault, too.
Watch It Melt automated car, there is no operator, just a engineer.
ya... he had plenty of time to override it and make it stop.
It's one more "IF" statement in the code :)
TheRadiastral if{{light}={red}}, {stop}
+DmacAttack if(no_pedestrians()) run_red_light();
Heh, this isn't the 80s. The code running on that thing isn't monolithic. You could write code for an AI project primarily with IF statements but you will go crazy before you complete the project.
TheRadiastral well maybe its Python:
if pedestrian == 0:
run_red_light ()
else:
stop ()
Nicolas Tsagarides no it wouldn't be that hard
theres someone in there..
any name people can be behind the wheel in a "driverless" car
Technically we don't know if this was the computer driving or the human driver taking over to run the light and save himself time.
Patrick B But we do know that driver has been suspended by Uber. So either he is a scape goat or he ran the red light.
Patrick B at 0:09 you can see a man in the car
TheCatLord The driver can actually take control and that is what Uber is claiming that occurred. That's why they suspended him.
From what I understand, there IS a driver behind the steering wheel, but the car can be driven by itself (just like a tesla).
So you're telling me these drivers just sit there (or even sleep) when I'm riding at the back?
greentealatte No, I don't know how people got this notion that these cars are "self-driving". They aren't fully autonomous, the tech is still in "beta-testing", if you will. It uses basic sensor technology and satellite mapping, yet if driver is asleep or anything goes wrong it's not the techs fault, it's never is since there is literally a warning saying "tech is still in prototype phase, don't rely on it %100, you still need to be aware as the driver"
for the record, you should never sleep behind the wheel of a moving vehicle. I don't care how advanced it is, there will be times that you have to manually override to prevent an accident.
A cab company is behind this video... a grain a salt
Why are people so ok with making fun of people who don't want our jobs being taken by robots?
+Roi Goes to Hollywood In the future people won't "own" cars. All vehicles will be shared as you need a ride. No need for great big parking lots anywhere as the cars keep rolling 24/7 from one need to the next. All re-fueling/service is done by "the company" {state?} and you get billed {if at all} once a month. It does mean that there will only really need to be ONE design. {After all, one-size fits all. Right?}
Hi Charles, I'm Dr. Travis Stork with the The Doctors in Los Angeles. I am typing to let you know we will be discussing the new uber self-driving car and also be featuring this clip in an upcoming episode of The Doctors. We will not be giving you any credit whatsoever. Thanks for posting this video!
Finally, A Self-driving car after my own heart...
*I can make it, there's no red light camera*
No proof there wasn't a human driving it
that's grand and all but here in the south no body uses cross walks and nobody gives a fuck if you run a red light unless a cop is all out of ideas and bored with just sitting in the car.
A Lyft ad came up before I watched this vid 😂😂😂
These cars are not 100% driverless FYI, someone is in the front seat
Well that person sure has some balls, if it runs a red light next to a cop car....
Expl0re Life but the cop did nothing about it lol
Matt Fab But he's not a mind reader so I'm sure he didn't know he wouldn't gotten stopped...
LMAO right after uber's commercial
I was so confused for 10 mins, because I thought the video would be from the ubers perspective
the fuck I care for, I run a red every other week, don't worry about the cars worry about me
First rationalization of self aware A.I. : "Fuck it!"
Let me guess, it got smart enough to wonder why it's taking orders.
that's a thug life Uber
Not really surprised when based off the driving skill of a GTA NPC.......
Self-driving car at stop light: "It doesn't look like anything to me."
It's learning...
oiTzBiGJo yea it takes time
Reddit Gold™ user here with a /r/STEM degree. Based on my periodic browsing of /r/engineering, I can confirm that the car ran a red traffic signal. Please be patient while I have my best /r/memeengineers work on figuring out the bug. Thanks!
Yours,
Justin Memer
Idk what's funnier, the video or the fact I got an Uber ad served to join their driving team
PC is not a perfect race, but still a master
Hi Charles. I'm with RT America, an international news outlet. We were wondering if we could use your video on our platforms with credit to you. Thank you!
Credit Luxor Cab San Francisco
The better way to credit the cab industry is not by discrediting Uber. It's by competing on merit. Give your riders clean, comfortable, well-maintained cars. Drivers that are friendly, well-dressed and have good hygiene. Methods of hailing a ride, and paying for the ride that are quick and easy. Means for getting help should any problem arise, and the willingness to solve those problems. Is this too much to ask?
Uber haven't got any "methods for getting help" Uber droid unless you count email As for the other slurs standard Uber droid speak.
F RT. Don't give them anything.
FUCK RT they're Kremlin propaganda
The only thing I got out of this video is I guess Volvo makes nice cars now.
They learn fast. Even computers don't want to wait.
Uber doesn't have a permit to use completely driverless cars. There was a human driving this car that ran the light and this car isn't even part of their pilot where the driver let's the car take over. This is nothing but a smear job by some bitter cab company. This is probably the first light the cabbie stopped at all day.
It didn't run it, there is a delay in between cycles.
This is just another case of a cab company trying to screw over uber. This could be edited (fake).
I love it's trending description "The car was operated by a human driver"
it was human error it had adriver in it
The folly of blaming human error is well established in safety critical systems
Hahahaja the machine probably learned that from others.
I was playing Game of War, but this one ass keeps kicking my player
Brad Asbury Is it 72dnegel?
And that's why there's a Lyft ad next to the video.
when siri says "im home alone" lmao
I had to make this joke lol
Hi Charles. Nick from Australian news site nine.com.au here. Is it okay if we run this video on our platforms? We'll make sure to attribute you. Thanks.
Tell Karl to do something fun tomorrow lad
news media should stick to news.
stop stealing viral videos and pretending your infotainment isn't cancerous bullshit
Credit Luxor Cab San Francisco
I hate how journalism these days is just someone sitting on their laptop looking for someone else' video online and putting it on their news network.
Uber is telling me this isn't a driverless vehicle, dude. It's a mapping vehicle that has a driver. The time-stamp on the video says November 28. Driverless vehicles weren't even on the road yet.
is there any proof that this car was in self-driving mode?
RI Patriot it's not even a driver-less vehicle. It's a mapping vehicle. Those have drivers.
I like how Uber is advertising it on TH-cam, but they disable the comments and like lmao
sees "San Francisco, you self driving Uber is here"
keeps scrolling
"self driving Uber runs red light"
nice
Rise of the Machines.
bait click at its finest
Dondii Mosley no, the uber car was one next to the car that is recording, it's a silver gray vehicle and runs the light when it is at a full red
bruce shuler yeah but self-driving tho?
Acura .Ignite yes, pause the video and look on the top and sides of the car it is one of the cars they were making the adds about
So it's just like a real person.
it was probably optimised to focus on safety over law.
"Time is money", the Jewish Volvo said to itself.
I wonder how long until one of them accidentally hits someone?
I heart Lyoko Already happened lol he walked right in front of the cars way thinking it was going to stop.
Looks like those self driving Ubers still need a bit of work
I don't see the big deal. It's only mimicking what humans do
Hi Charles. Can we use your video in our newscast and online with proper credit to you? KTVU-TV
Credit Luxor Cab San Francisco
greggrin no
BE sure to download LYFT and use promo code TEXSTATE for TEN FREE RIDES!!!
Hi Charles my name is laton can I steal your video and give you no credit?
Thank you for using Johnny Cab!!
Must be a Sailor Moon Ford Fusion