Why Puma IFV has no competition.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.ค. 2024
- Attribution for images used at 3:42 and 6:10 :
Boevaya mashina, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Patreon: / redeffect
Blogspot: germanarmor.blogspot.com/2020...
German Puma Infantry Fighting Vehicle is considered by many the best IFV in the world. While some things may be a stretch, there are some things that really make it completely unmatched.
Sources:
www.rheinmetall-defence.com/e...
www.hensoldt.net/products/opt...
www.angelopodesta.com/document...
www.hensoldt.net/products/opt...
www.hensoldt.net/fileadmin/HE... - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
Attribution for images used at 3:42 and 6:10 :
Boevaya mashina, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PERI_Puma.JPG
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Puma_IFV_MUSS.jpg
"There are some things that Puma does better than T-15" - I guess the main advantage here is that, contrary to the T-15, the Puma IFV does actually exist in deployable numbers and is not vaporware.
wonder if that torque value for the T-15 is real. I suspect not.
We should get some into Ukraine and see how good they actually are.
@@ebrim5013 with untrained soldiers basically worthless.
Came to the comments to post this but you beat me to it hahaha
Development of the Puma began many years earlier. So give T-15 some time...
I love how the text to speech software seems to have a German accent lmao
V i d e o e h
Because he literally uses the two most popular german TTS.
That’s cos it’s a popular German TTS
Wait what?
Nope
Red effect : how much sponsorship do you wanna give?
War thunder : YES!
Unlike other TH-camrs, I don't mind the sponsorships, it's relevant, and it helps keep the channel running.
Have you heard of this cool new game called War: Shadow Thunder?
@@MrCantStopTheRobot XD
He makes quality content. Let him profit from his efforts lol
I love warthunder
"The mobility is good enough" - that's an understatement, the Puma was designed to match the speed of the Leopard 2 going full power on rough terrain.
Its supposed to match the torque. Puma is significantly faster.
@@PugilistCactus The Puma's raw speed on on roads is higher, but large tanks like the Leopard 2 are usually faster on rough terrain due to the tracks being bigger. They have more stability and roll easier over the rough stuff. That's why the Puma's mobility is impressive , it's because it can also go over rough stuff as fast as the large tanks.
I read this as mach 2
The puma hits a target in 3 km during driving full speed …….
It has a communication system on board so the driver sees everything that the infantry around him.
This is the most advanced machine in this class.
The newest and best.
ebrc jaguar ? idk it's wheeled but i believe they have the same purpose
@@EreVR-jp8dd The Jaguar is mainly a reconaissance vehicle. They are not in the same class with the Puma.
But yes, the reconnaisance of the Jaguar is also state of the art.
Well Rheinmetalls Lynx is probably as advanced but thats the same company soooo :D
Yes I didn’t know if I should laugh or cry as he said the T-15 would be superior like as the Su-34 is superior to the F-35 right ? 🤣
Well at least the Puma EXISTS and the Bundeswehr got 300 combat ready at any time.
die fanboys immer du hast aber mit beckomen das der bord computer regelmäsig abstürzt und nimand weiß warum? und die maschine minutenlang lamliegt
damn that pronouncation of ´´Schützenpanzer Puma``was relly good
What? He forget to spell the T and E, it wasnt good spelling.
@Bounze wir können das gerne auf Akzent freiem Hochdeutsch klären. Er hat es nicht perfekt ausgesprochen, er nuschelte.
@@kevinpagel2527 Sowohl das e, als auch das t sind bei "Schützenpanzer" stumm.
he almost sounded like hes a german pronouncing it
@@kevinpagel2527 hab ja nicht gesagt das es perfekt war aber es war ganz gut für jemand der kein Deutsch kann
Your chance of being seen at 17 km is low
but never zero
The best part is that horizon line is at most 6.7 km since puma is a tall vehicle. Guaranteed spotting and it can spot helicopters at ranges of 12km.
"Why Puma has no competition"
In its price level that is...
True but it look's sexy right
It's hard to estimate the real price tag on the T15 since it won't be exported any time soon and things in Russia work very differently than in Germany.
Hhutuber since there are only 10 or so they can’t be that cheap
Goran 8.85 million€ without rockets or laser weapon
Hhutuber but I mean the t-14 is 3.7 million let’s say the t-15 is 3 million
We need a video on the modular, budget, export Puma: The Lynx
Wait, there is one of those?
@@Seth9809 in fact there are two: The KF 31 and the KF 41
Ze Box :v
The Lynx is/are totally different from the Puma. The KF31 is actually a heavily modernized Marder.
Der Kernspalter the KF31 was... it was a proof of concept and based on the Marder... the KF41 is it’s own vehicle... both the Lynx and Puma use the MK30 weapon system but the Lynx has a manned turret
Last time I was this early, Constantinople still belonged to the Byzantines
An unexpected but welcome comment
Sultan mehmed II took it when you sleep man. 😆
@@GuderII
What's the matter Turkic Muslims! Don't have your own Country? Nor a nation of your own?
@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 considering that includes all of the nation's back in the age. This is rather hypocritical coming from you.
@@revis0nedrelived830
Constantinople and Byzantine ( Byzantium ) already exist.
*laughs in efficiency*
Laughs in USSR
Laughs in too short on spareparts XD
This newest cornet i last test on tiger will be on atlet because russia will produce atlet instead of tiger, cornet i meantion is on the link and that cornet destroy from 90deegres to and they called it sniper cornet, at last this cornet will be installed on t14armata th-cam.com/video/Q5ynLv2jKq0/w-d-xo.html
German Reich disconnected
@@thebigone9781 oh, yeah, Zvezda
I've been watching their military related videos for quite awhile like drills and training and SU-24s
5:44 that face
That was filmed at my workplace
Hi RedEffect there's one thing I would like to point out: engine torque doesn't matter. I don't blame you for making the mistake that more 'torquey' engine is better: it is popularized by car journalists who tend to know little about how cars work, and car makers advertise this figure fully knowing it's BS. What really determines how fast a vehicle accelerates or how much load it pulls is torque at the output axis: the tyre or drive sprocket. And this torque is engine torque multiplied by gear ratio and final drive ratio minus drivetrain loss. This means an engine with less torque can make up the deficit by using shorter gear ratios, but that also means they need more engine rpm to make up for the higher reduction which they tend to do.
What's unique about Puma's engine is that it's unusually high revving for a military vehicle, in fact it's higher revving than many passenger cars. The design philosophy is to maximize specific power (kW/L) and power density (kW/kg), so the power pack can be more compact, weighs less, and consumes less fuel (fewer friction/heat loss).
Instead the real problem here is not it has less torque than the Armata or any other military vehicle. It's that higher power density designs tend to have more stress and possibly more maintenance. This is the true reason pickup trucks and large SUVs use big 'torquey' V8 engines instead of a small screaming I4; the same applies to military vehicles too. I don't know how reliable Puma's engine is though, since reliability depends on many factors.
Interesting thx man
finaly someone who understand mechanics, also with more torque and unskilled crew there is greater chance of braking transmission. it is cheaper to produce it like this and I think it is safer to use it :D
I mean, it does kinda screw it when climbing an incline. Gonna suck when the engine gives out when going up a steep mountain valley.
@@PugilistCactus Not really, if the transmission is any good. You could go up steep inclines in much heavier vehicles with less powerful engines and less sophisticated transmissions 80 years ago.
@@PugilistCactus not necessarily. The transmission does it's job and the engine has a more flexible RPM range than most vehicles. If you need to climb a steep hil just shift down a gear or two and drive with a higher RPM. The Puma can do this due to its flexibility. Most other vehicles use truck like engines that don't vary a whole lot in their RPM range.
You forgot the most important thing about the puma...
It looks incredibly badass!
Honestly most armoured vehicles are looking more and more the same as time goes on. Convergent evolution
@@BeKindToBirds form follows function after all
Hah- NO! It doesn't look "badass"! xD On the contrary - its hull looks fat and overweight with a horrid cartoonish grid on the turret instead of a normal cannon mantlet...
So sorry but Puma is one of the most visually repellent one, out of modern IFVs...
And not to mention that it's so overcomplicated flawed that it - can't be even certified for active service...
"6 gears in reverse"
French army "WE'LL BUY 1000!"
HAHAHAHAHHAHA
XD
I mean hey, at least you can still shoot in reverse.
So we can roll you over 2 times, 1 in forward an 1 in reverse !
XD
If this thing comes at me, I would literally PUMA pants.
*sigh. ಠ_ಠ
Take my like and get out
Booo lame joke
Bruh
@@werecatpodguski let me guess, dog fail compilations are more your thang, right?
mentions anything german
JETZT IST DEIN KOMMENTARBEREICH
UNSERE KOMMENTARBEREICH
DEUTSCHLAND
No black painted broomsticks for machine gun?
Des is doch Kommunismus is des!
Ich wünsch ich wäre ein Huhn,
ich hätt nicht viel zu tun,
ich leg am Tag ein Ei
und Sonntags auch mal zwei!
This comment is ridicules! We germans don‘t have humor
2:35 wow! I always wondered how some auto cannons can be "duel feed" and swap between different cartridges on the fly, so it's an open bolt.
I've learned something new today 😁
So did I!
The Bradley Cannons use an entirely different system but are also dual belt feed
open bolt systems make maintenance and cleaning a lot easier as well, as long as you have a proper safety... that's a big problem for open bolt designs, like many german MGs, as the MG3, you have no real safety, as you can't lock the bolt when it's not opened, but an open bolt is the fire ready position
also generally open bolt systems aren't as precise as closed bolt systems but thats for machineguns rather than auto cannons since these are able to reliably fight threats at 3000 meters
@@jolioding_2253 the higher mass of the receiver in the autocannon negates most of the accuracy issues of the open bolt design
The industry would love to sell hard and soft kill protection systems for the german Leopard 2 tanks, but you know... budget.
The Leo. 2 could get the thropy APS. It´s already in the making.
@@Tankliker yeah they are curently testing it, the same APS as one the Merkava.
The budged of the german military is more than adequate. Look where it stands in the world, relative to soldiers fielded. We could accomplish so much if we downsized bureaucracy and stopped throwing the money out the window, having corruption scandals and having shitty ministers of defense back to back for decades.
@Apple Tek Support What you mean is a warmongering budget. There is a distinct difference. All three of these nations cripple their civil progress for excessive military spending. Look at how much money Germoney spends for each active soldier, then compare it to countries within a margin of reason, like France, the UK etc. Lack of funding is not our problem.
Wobbegong its warmongering if you are the top spender.
Germany’s position as the shield of europe means it SHOULD invest more for the security of the EU
ARJUNK tank commander: Why am i hearing music over the comms?
*Puma antitank missile hits Arjunk MBT*
*COFFIN DANCE MUSIC INTENSIFIES*
Good joke. 😄😄😄
*AND THE MISSILE ONLY SCRATCH HIS SPACE ARMOR*
@@FRFFW nope it hits from above.
Arjunk is going back to the scrap yard from which it came haha!
@@91plm hahahahahahah
@@91plm if arjunk was in war thunder i could pen it with my panther A lol
the firstt time i ever watched red effect, when he said fire control system i thought it meant when the engines caught on fire and it needs to be extinguished. im dumb
To be honest if I didn't know better I'd have assumed the same thing.
We all have been there man
Well that's not really that much of a stretch tbf! And we are only human at the end of the day
@@anotherrandomtexan25 you may be human but I'm not. I atleast now the names of my internal component groups.
@@Tankliker I have a rival I see...
Damn M8, your pronunciation of "Schützenpanzer" was flawless. Gute Arbeit!
7:15 in real combat the units deployed by a puma would carry Anti-tank weapons and adapt their loadout to the situation (offense, defense etc. A.e. in defense the team also has one engineer to erect barricades) keeping them versatile.
So these aren't German soldier it looks like American
What I miss in the video is that the puma isn't there to be used against tanks but to support the soldiers against light armour vehicles and personnel the units deployed by the puma have good enough anto tank weapons to destroy tanks
Me, a soldier who just wants to know what some guy on youtube has to say about our Puma: *clicks on video*
Video: *plays German National Anthem*
Me: *suddenly stands at attention saluting*
Grüße von der Eloka
@@PhilipFry. Grüße aus Bonn nach Frankenberg. Ich hoffe, dass Ihr zeitnah die neuen Unterkünfte beziehen könnt.
@Denis No.
@Denis a MBT has a completely different structure than an APC, just because you take the turret out you have still the engine in the back and all that
@Denis This is mainly because the Puma has more technology in it than the Leopard. The ATGM modules for example, and the laser sensors, and keeping compatibility with all of that means you have to keep all the systems in. Of course you could just take away the turret of a tank and reduce its armor, put the engine at the front and make an APC out of it. This is essentially what the M113 is. But the M113 does not have all the features that the Puma has. No real scouting ability, no ATGM, no 30mm gun, no protection system, no composite armor.
Update, the Puma is in War Thunder now.
And it's quite OP
where?
@@944Tomcat In the game War Thunder.
2:50 Forgotten Weapons :D
I knew it looked like Ian's hands
Do one on the cv90!
the premium rank 6 one
@@m1a1abrams3 OR! The real one?!?! 😅
Things the Puma can do better than the T-15: drive, being deployed, not being basically a paper tank, being more than a inventory statistic/meintion in the arsenal. And many more, but no need to beat a dead horse...
the main thing Puma does better than T-15 - it exists.
Make a video of the Swedish CV90 (STRF90)
`Fun Fact` The 6 reverse gears are added, bc we want to sell the tank to other NATO members. This includes France
Next could be cv 90
Love your videos. You should make a video about the CV90 Platform, especially with the upcoming MKIV overhaul.
the weazel is also quite nice as you can stuf 2 of em in a helicopter and paradrop them are fast and can even be used in the dessert because of it's relative low weight.
also has a lot of optional upgrades as antitank systems and mortars.
This was really comprehensive and informative with tecnical data that make sense. The narrater speak in such a way that one can follow exactly what is meant to say. No warm patato in the mouth accent and the video clip shows exactly what is under discussion. No B.S and rethoric nonsense. Very professional. Thanx so much.
5:44 Puma gun laughs at camera (smiley face). :D
Finally! After this, you'll be making videos about other IFVs as well! 😁
@RedEffect as a result of this great video, the comment section is now property of the BRD (federal republic germany). We thank a lot😂
Amazing audio. It makes all the people requesting footage speak with the same voice. That's like one of those space age translators you see on the late night infomercials. Amazing by any standard.
Served 4 years in the bundeswehr Panzergrenadierbataillon 112 and let me tell you, the Puma sounds great on paper and all the official info germany releases but its something completely different in reality. Puma came 5 years later than planed, served when we got the first in the bataillon, at the end of my service we had 40 of which only 3 were combatready the production got rushed and they were full of bugs and errors, at some point we had one tank that could drive but not use the turret and an other puma that could use the turret but wasnt able to drive we joked about just changing those parts and having at least one working tank. The designers also made a huge flaw because they had to designt the tank after the criteria that pregnant female soldiers should be able to drive (i shit you not) the tank had oversize which made transportation a very diffucult task beeing overseized the tank route had to be planed very careful and escorted by police or the MPs, its also partly electric which means we had huge portable chargers and had to plug them in, in my opinion a downside overall the tank wasnt very popular and in my 4 years of service i barely saw them in action
Funfact: Soldier Hauptgefreiter at 09:40 is from the 4 Kompanie 33. Panzerbataillon
Gott schütze Deutschland, denn wir können es nicht
@@komradearti9935 Ah Ja, der Spiegel. Unsere Elite des Qualitätsjournalismus, die auch das G36 madig gemacht haben.
@Ricardo Milos das ist schon passiert. heißt Lynx, ist die Export Version. Basiert auf dem Original Design. Größter Nachteil gegenüber dem Puma, Sicherheit für Schwangere kann nicht garantiert werden und die Anleitung ist nicht gegendert.
@@nox5555 das nennst du einen Nachteil? x)
The Armata was an idea that was tossed from the drawing board across the room and hit the rim of the waste basket .....
Would be interesting to hear about the CV9040/30 There are aa few in europe at this time. Specially its winter capabilety.
THANK YOU.. PLEASE CONTINUE.. YOU DO GREAT WORK
Just a little addition concerning the pumas protection. In its combat configuration passive armor at the front, the sides and the turret provides protection against 30mm. In the back there is still armor against 14,5mm. Additionally there is 360° RPG protection (CLARA-ERA at the front and sides and cage armor at the back) and roof protection against artillery bomblets.
intro killed me lmao
RIP
i ve to disagree with the torque comparison, horse power is horse power. the Puma has an high rpm engine which allows it to use a different gearing.
Bro you have made me look smart in front of my friends and for that I am very thankful
Great modern footage! Very informative. 😊 Thanks
Some of the footage is only about half a year old or so. I actually was there when the camerateam filmed
Before this video the only thing I really knew about the Puma was that it's absolutely OP in War Thunder.
The Problem with T14/15 is that they are so expensive in production, hence why they are only build in small numbers
Nah, they are Russian made. Most likely overcrowded with problems, even the PUMA still has, and tons more. The Russians are currently not able to surpass any western powers regarding military technology. That should not sound racist in any way, but it is an dictatorship/"communism". Everyone is corrupt and the production highly depends on bribe money and persons in charge. Complicated, highly advanced technology is nothing Russia knows something about or can produce on a greater scale, simply put. That is the main reason they still use realiable but totally outdated T-72s, T-80s (even as BVM) and T-90s. Their MBTs are as heavy as German specialised IFV (the PUMA is much more than "only" an IFV).
In Ukraine, you see the full problem of Russian military: Not enough planning and bribe money. Catastrophic planning, basically no logistic making thousands of armored vehicles heavy road blocks and a troop morale that cannot even be strengthened by Russian generals - of which they have lost almost a fifth total.
Believe me or not, Russia or more likely Putin, has totally overrated its own military.
And breaks down during Parades....
well so is the puma, isn't it the most expensive tank of the world?
@@mr_bischof1406 the Puma is about 17 Mio Euros, i doubt the T15 is much more expensive...
@@laschagga8886why openly bullshit like that ?
Excellent video. Thanks
Nice, although I think that the Lynx has more potential thanks to its modular approach, so it depends on how much the customer is willing to expend.
This IFV video series should go on. I would love to see about the BMP-3, the swedish CV-90 and Bradley.
Actually, the T-15 beats the Puma with it's ATGM system, where both Commander & gunner can fire two missiles at the same time and slightly with front hull protection. The amount of tourque is rather trivial as long as it fits into the combined arms role. Which is the case with the newer Leopard 2 models, as the MBTs got heavier all along. When the Puma was developed/designed, this was a "must have requirement" for the engineers from the beginning.
Edit: I think the video was a little bit too quiet this time, I had to increase volume pretty hard.
I think the Puma wins actually as.....its in service.
The dual fire ATGM's of the T-15 is an awesome system but if the missile can't see the target or gets jammed (due to MUSS) it wont help too much. But I guess it is not much different for the T-15 since it has an APS so both will have trouble hitting each other with ATGM's.
@@FireLord459 This is no F&F?
@@synthilein Maybe I'm wrong but with F&F do you mean Fire and Forget? If so I don't see the point you're making.
Love the BMP series.
Awesome video. Can you please do a video on Sweden's Combat Vehicle 90 some time? It looks so sexy.
Many thanks. Very informative.
Over all a good video but i have to mention that you mixed two different variants. Mostly you spoke about the serial puma for the german army with a vehiclecount of (when all are ready) 340. But sometimes you talked and showed specs from the upgraded version called vjtf. When you talked about the great camera coverage you showed a picture of the camerapositions from the vjtf. I build the Puma and some of the footage was filmed at my workplace
Could you do a video about Swedish tanks and IFVs?
have you heard about the german scout vehicle Fennek? that's an amazing one as well
How about the old Luchs...
@@johnny5wd567 the friend of my mother lived to complain about its gun and how useless it became after grand scale usage of thermal camera systems.
Oooh... video on the boxer, maybe? :)
Many countries are using it, some in special configurations
It looks very very similar to the Namer APC, which is now being upgraded with the Puma's autocanon
I love the intro music: "Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser, ...."
i think he wanted to use the german national anthem. They use the same melody
Deutschland, Deutschland über alles
Du bist ja höchstwahrscheinlich ein Östereicher. Wie würdest du Großdeutschland finden?
@@julian281198 that's Germanic bully humour, you anglo.
Vehicles like the T14-15 need to be considered technology demonstrators / prototypes and not combat vehicles, because they're not in production and AFAIK not deployed to combat units.
Yes we see in Ukraine... They are just Show models for Putin... But the Puma is real
I just love the comedically tiny barrel inside of the giant outer barrel cage or whatever you want to call it. Also this thing is the goat in War Thunder, absolutly love it.
Excellent video. Would you be able to look into VCC 80 Dardo or South African Badger IFV? There's so little on TH-cam for either of these vehicles.
Bruh, can't wait till they add it on their tech tree.
Do the CV-90 IFV next please
Surely with the CV90-120 model
@@jungfer27 The CV90-120 isn't used by anyone and it isn't an IFV
I really like your videos! Can you please talk about the Italian B1 Centauro tank destroyer in the future?
0:46 smoke ring LOL
5:49 look at that smiling face
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit!
Great unbiased analysis!
so last year I saw an autocanon on a truck on the way to a test, didn't recognize it but this is it, it was the PUMA's autocanon, apperently they want to upgrade our APCs to IFVs with this.
Do a vid about the Swedish CV90! 😁
Now do a video on the Cv90 variants
Germany sure love naming their tanks/ifv with big cats.
Maus tho...
Now the Puma is gonna come to WT
Why puma IFV has no competition
*Forgets about the OP Arjun and its trick shot capabilities and how the Arjun multi purpose tank crew have to go through extensive World of tanks training and Call of Duty no scope championships in Search and destroy on MW2 and not MW3 because they dont like that one*
EDIT: I forgive you this time Red lol jk good video as always
can you please stop saying trash about arjun
God mate your going to get a lot of nationalist Indians who can’t take a joke commenting
Rudra Pratap it is a bad tank
@@MrTangolizard i cant take a joke anymore because i am hearing it from months
@@MrTangolizard by just watching a biased video you can't tell everything about a tank
The T-15 isn't the best IFV because it is WAY to heavy and large, plus I'm willing to guess they cost a lot compared to most other IFVs. The T-15 is as big/heavy as some modern MBTs. So now crossing bridges and transporting the T-15 is going to be a a huge issue when compared to other IFVs.
It also doesn't exist so that is a big -
One of your only videos that I TOTALLY agree with...
Except for the Nammer, and the Brand new Wheel version (of the Nammer called the Eitan).
Israel’s own version comes standard with an unmanned 30mm turret and the trophy anti Anti-Tank Missile System built right into the turret from the start.
But it’s that 35m monster that I love!!! 5mm doesn’t sound like a lot, but it increases the projectile’s weight from about 300-320 grams to ~550 grams. With a barrel that’s 90 or 95 calibers long!!!! [That’s 3.325 meters]
It also has a 76mm Grenade launcher in the back for protection against soft targets at close range
You should do the CV90 next
The Puma with it's latest configuration and armor setup is still significantly lighter than the T-15 in it's base setup. It doesn't require that much power. It's also an easier overall build, which is less prone to issues, and weighing cost, efficiency and production, on the long run the Puma is a far more profitable long term investment than the T-15.
The T-15 isn't even a thing, honestly i don't understand how RedEffect could ever believe that it was a serious program. The entire armata program has been clearly dead since at least 2018-2019. I mean they didn't have enough money to upgrade the T-90 to T-90M and stated that it was unnecessary to upgrade the T-90 because the T-72B3M was good enough
Nice video. I would consider KF 41 Lynx or Merkava IFV to be in the same class when fitted with appropriate turrets.
You mean namer?
Could you if possible to make a video on the cv90? But in a way in how it is best for the country's that use it, like why merkava is best or closest to best for the isrealy militairy...
Come on Gaijin. Add the upgraded Puma to WT along with the BMPT 72 Terminator
Stridsvagn 103 when?
There is literally a dragrace between an abrams, Bradley, Fuchs and a puma. 🥇Fuchs🥈Puma🥉Abrams and Last the Bradley
5:39 I like the little smiley face they put on that
so we are just not gonna mention any of the CV 90 variant IFVs?
If you dont hit the PUMA first when you see it youre basically screwed.
Hey could you do like top 20 best tanks in the world cause you are the only channel which uses real information and not just emotions when talking about tanks
Think you could do a video on the variants of the Leopard 2 in current service over the world? Such as the ones in service in Europe, Turkey and Southeast Asia. Some of these variants seem to have their own domestic upgrades, and it might be interesting to shed some light on them!
Germany did it again ,another wonderfully designed wat machine.
And it's beautiful ,that is a plus and it never hurts ,right? Respect from France ,our German allies really know how to make great peaces of equipment ,they always knew and always will , that's in their blood i guess 🇲🇫🇩🇪✊
Great video as always ,keep going like that it's perfect.
@@arvedludwig3584yes , I hope so .and let's hope the SCAF is a success as well .
@@valegendre
well you can always buy some pumas or leopards from us to keep your stock up until you got some working modern tanks yourself.
@@uteriel282 the Leclerc MBT is not the best but not the worst either ,it have been upgraded and is pretty capable so I'm good thank you .plus I don't have any room left in my garage ,I couldn't fit a leopard if I wanted to lol.
- Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder
Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.
Do one on chinese ifvs. Idk jackshit about those things and their capabilities
Please do a video on t72 m4 cz👍
Look lisaent me pls i naed to talk you smafing pls gat my namber phon you whatn yes ore no we took in video chat i have latt of informishen abut tank leopard 2
0549477942
If you want, I would like to ask what you think of the b2 centauro of the italian army
Puma is a nice IFV... 5min driving, system crash , 2min reboot, 5min driving....This thing doesn't work at all. Almost all are broken, spare parts are not available. And those that still drive only work for a few minutes. Then you have to pull the fuses for a reboot.
PUMA!!!! Ausgesheischnet!!! Prima! Sehr gut! Danke!
CV-90 FTW
I think the swedish Cv90 can Compete with the puma! :D
it would outcompete the puma. the puma has many many technical problems is not really any combat ready. I know people who served on these.
Germany tested the CV90 in 2002. It was rejected because of insufficient mine protection, bad weight-protection ratio and low growth potential. They went on developing the Puma afterwards.
@@jonny2954 and the development was a total desaster
@@scheisseaufpasswort I disagree. While the continuously changing and from the start very demanding requirements indeed delayed the program and increased its cost the end result is the safest IFV in service. There were some far worse AFV development processes that ended in nothing.
can you do a video on the french jaguar or its prototype the AMX-10 t40 please