According to the narration, the period of H re-ionisation started 400 million years after the big bang and lasted till 100 billion years after the big bang. WHAT?
Actually I'd say, it turns out he MIGHT be right. Who knows what "new findings" are coming next? Like when he said, "Blah blah blah, & this gives rise to three scenarios." I hate to nitpick, but I'm gonna, just because of the way he pronounces "quasars"... anyway the "blah blah blah, & this gives rise to three scenarios" is RIDICULOUS. The only way to make it accurate is to say, "yada yada, & this gives rise to MILLIONS of different scenarios, all wildly improbable, w/ the odds against us having figured it out...or against us EVER figuring it out for sure... being literally astronomical." Then they should say, "In this video we will discuss three out of the millions of possible scenarios, remembering that the odds truly are millions to one that we're anywhere close to correct on this issue, but it's fun as a thought exercise if nothing else." At least it'd be the honest thing to say...
Or maybe the telescope has reached its limit? 🤔 Scientists try every day to calculate the age of the universe, where it begins and perhaps when it ends, but with each new theory it seems clear to me that it is infinite.
![Journey to the Andromeda Galaxy [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-ybiXR2WCFQ/mqdefault.jpg)
According to the narration, the period of H re-ionisation started 400 million years after the big bang and lasted till 100 billion years after the big bang. WHAT?
I like Zwicky. Everybody thought he was a crazy old man. He turns out to be right.
Actually I'd say, it turns out he MIGHT be right. Who knows what "new findings" are coming next? Like when he said, "Blah blah blah, & this gives rise to three scenarios." I hate to nitpick, but I'm gonna, just because of the way he pronounces "quasars"... anyway the "blah blah blah, & this gives rise to three scenarios" is RIDICULOUS. The only way to make it accurate is to say, "yada yada, & this gives rise to MILLIONS of different scenarios, all wildly improbable, w/ the odds against us having figured it out...or against us EVER figuring it out for sure... being literally astronomical."
Then they should say, "In this video we will discuss three out of the millions of possible scenarios, remembering that the odds truly are millions to one that we're anywhere close to correct on this issue, but it's fun as a thought exercise if nothing else." At least it'd be the honest thing to say...
The telescope already proved the big bang is a localized event with the 14,000,000,000 ly mark event horizon
Why can’t we do a 360 with the James Webb telescope and up and down?
On the basis of what has been presented here, astronomy becomes a speculative science, and maybe it has been until now, but no one told us that...
Wrong again. "Universe could be twice as old as previously thought?" It could be 50 or 100 times older. Who knows?
It’s infinite and ageless
Thanks!
Hilarious that scientists still think they can understand. We all live in a simulation- just ask anyone Who has had an NDE near death experience…
I’ve been writing about this before the telescope was even up. It’s nice being proven right
I was thinking, I bet there are going to be non-scientists that believe this crap, and here you are!
This is the MIT cover-up of Infiniti
The clue is in the term, "Observable" Universe.
Or maybe the telescope has reached its limit? 🤔
Scientists try every day to calculate the age of the universe, where it begins and perhaps when it ends, but with each new theory it seems clear to me that it is infinite.
if a constant i variable is not a constant any more is it 🤣🤣
Only God and Christ know the age of the universe , for they are the ones who made it,.